Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cystoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Cystoscopic impression versus histologic diagnosis in bladder tumors. Do they coincide?].

OBJECTIVE: How quality control in a university hospital and immediatly after to resents publications; we planed to evaluation of the correlation of cystoscopy impression with the histologic diagnosis after of transurethral resection (TUR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To give more truthfulness to the study, we requested to all department member's, that to base in your experience to describe the endoscopic characteristic of the next bladder tumors groups: superficial and low-grade GI-II Ta, superficial and high-grade GIII Ta and high grade and/or T1-< T2. In a total of 172 patients, we evaluated the initial cystoscopy impression and we to compared it with histologic diagnosis after to TUR. RESULTS: In 172 tumors the cystoscopy classifed in 69 cases how superficial and low grade GI-II Ta-T1, 40 how superficial and high grade and 55 how high grade and/or invasive tumors GIII T1-< T2. When, we compared it with the histologic diagnosis, the cystoscopy to coincided in 46 de 69 cases (66.6%) (PNS) with the group of low-grade GI-II Ta-T1 in 13 of 40 (32.5%) (P < 0.005) with the group of superficial high grade GIII Ta and 45 of 51 (88.2%) (PNS) with the group of GIII T1 and/or invasive tumors. In 15 of 172 the endoscopic description its not conclusive. And finally in 12 cases the histologic diagnosis were normal. CONCLUSIONS: In order of this results, we to consider that in a university hospital is essential the histologic diagnosis before any therapeutic decision, because the initial cystoscopy impression have a low correlation with the histologic diagnosis. We are disagreement with recent publication that propose the outpatient cystoscopy with fulguration to base only to the cystoscopy impression.

Cystoscopy↗
PubMed1999

Outpatient flexible cystoscope-assisted insertion of ureteric catheters and ureteric stents.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of inserting ureteric catheters (before retrograde ureterography) and JJ ureteric stents (both traditionally performed under general anaesthesia on inpatients) using local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting and with no patient selection bias, thus providing procedures to ease the demand on inpatient lists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients presenting with an appropriate clinical indication for either of the procedures underwent insertion during a scheduled flexible cystoscopy session in the outpatient department; information was collected on a standard proforma. Antibiotic prophylaxis and a nonsteroidal analgesic were administered 30 min before the procedure. RESULTS: To date, 20 patients (seven men, age range 32-74 years, and 13 women, age range 23-86 years) have undergone one of the two procedures. Fourteen patients had attempted retrograde catheter insertion, with success in 12, and six other patients underwent attempted JJ ureteric stent insertion, with success in five. The three failures were caused by an inability to see the relevant ureteric orifice. The mean duration of each procedure was 11 min; 14 of the 17 patients who had a successful procedure had no significant pain or discomfort, while the remaining three experienced significant pain and discomfort. There were no infective complications. CONCLUSION: These two procedures are suitable for the outpatient/day-case situation, and are well tolerated and accepted by most patients.

Adult↗