Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colorectal Cancer”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Review of the role of CPT-11 in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries, and although the treatment of advanced CRC has progressed substantially, the improvements in response rates have not always been translated into a significant survival benefit. Until recently, the standard therapy for advanced CRC was a variety of biomodulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimens. 5-FU was used as first- or second-line therapy, and a different 5-FU regimen was used second line if first-line 5-FU therapy failed. Typically, the survival times for these patients were short and their quality of life poor. In recent years, a variety of new agents have emerged that have demonstrated activity in the treatment of advanced CRC. Of these, irinotecan (CPT-11) and oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA) have yielded the most promising results. However, only CPT-11 combined with either bolus or high-dose infusional 5-FU/FA, in randomized phase III studies, has demonstrated an increased response rate and median time to progression, producing a significant and clinically relevant survival advantage. In 2 randomized phase III studies, oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA demonstrated a clear increase in response rate over 5-FU/FA alone but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage. CPT-11 was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2000 for the first-line treatment of advanced CRC in combination with 5-FU/FA.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Integration of multi-omics data uncovers novel germline susceptibility candidates in early-onset colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in individuals under 50 years of age, yet the underlying genetic predisposition remains largely unexplained, particularly in mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient cases. This study aimed to identify novel hereditary CRC susceptibility genes by integrating germline and tumour whole-exome sequencing (WES) with transcriptomic profiling across a cohort of early-onset CRC (EOCRC) patients. Tumours were categorised using Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) classification and analysed for mutational signature and burden. We used a novel 'All vs One' multi-omic integration approach to identify loss-of-function rare germline variants with concordant gene expression alterations in tumour tissue. Five candidate genes (ADCY4, NOXO1, CDHR2, ARHGAP10, EEF2K) were prioritised based on this approach and potential biological relevance in CRC. These findings highlight the molecular heterogeneity of EOCRC and demonstrate the utility of multi-omic approaches in refining germline variant interpretation. Integrating tumour transcriptomics enhances gene discovery efforts and supports a more comprehensive understanding of CRC heritability in younger individuals.

Humans↗

Genetic and epigenetic changes in primary metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops as multistep process, which involves genetic and epigenetic alterations. K-Ras, p53 and B-Raf mutations and RASSF1A, E-Cadherin and p16INK4A promoter methylation were investigated in 202 CRCs with and without lymph node and/or liver metastasis, to assess whether gene abnormalities are related to a metastogenic phenotype. K-Ras, B-Raf and p53 mutations were detected in 27, 3 and 32% of the cases, with K-Ras mutations significantly associated with metastatic tumour (P=0.019). RASSF1A, E-Cadherin and p16INK4A methylation was documented in 20, 44 and 33% of the cases with p16INK4A significantly associated with metastatic tumours (P=0.001). Overall, out of 202 tumours, 34 (17%) did not show any molecular change, 125 (62%) had one or two and 43 (21%) three or more. Primary but yet metastatic CRCs were prevalent in the latter group (P=0.023) where the most frequent combination was one genetic (K-Ras in particular) and two epigenetic alterations. In conclusion, this analysis provided to detect some molecular differences between primary metastatic and nonmetastatic CRCs, with K-Ras and p16INK4A statistically altered in metastatic tumours; particular gene combinations, such as coincidental K-Ras mutation with two methylated genes are associated to a metastogenic phenotype.

Aged↗

[Prevention of colorectal cancer].

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Argentina. The cumulative lifetime risk of developing CRC for both men and women is 4-6%. Despite advances in the management of this disease, the 5-year survival rate is about 60% because only 35% of patients are diagnosed when the disease is localized. Risk factors for CRC include age, diet and life style factors, personal or family history of adenomas or CRC and personal history of inflammatory bowel disease. Scientific evidence shows that primary and secondary prevention, through screening programs, permit to reduce incidence and mortality significantly. Chemopreventive agents, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, folate, and calcium, have been shown to have some preventive effect. Physical inactivity and excess body weight are consistent risk factors for CRC. Tobacco exposure, diet high in red meat and low in vegetables and alcohol consumption, probably in combination with a diet low in folate, appear to increase risk. The dietary fiber and risk of CRC has been studied but the results are still inconclusive. Screening for CRC is cost-effective compared with no screening, but a single optimal strategy cannot be determined from the currently available data. The advantages and disadvantages or limitations of screening modalities for CRC are analyzed. The literature and clinical practice guidelines are reviewed, with an emphasis on advances and evolving screening methods and recommendations for patients with average, moderate and high-risk CRC.

Argentina↗

[Etiology of colorectal cancer].

Colorectal cancer affect the 15% of general population in developed countries. Cancer is a multistep process in which multiple genetic alterations must usually occur in several years. The premalignant step consists of one or multiple aberrant crypts due to hyperproliferation of cells and its shift from the deep third of the crypt to its surface. It has been suggested that abnormality in the APC gene is responsible for this. Furthermore, there exists DNA hypometilation, activation of the gene K-ras and ornithine decarboxylase activity. There is also a loss of MCC gene, that seems to interact with the APC gene. Entire alterations described make possible the Class I adenoma formation. This adenoma, needs the loss of the DCC gene (late stage in the carcinogenesis process), to become a Class II adenoma. The following alteration is deleted and mutation of the p53 gene. There is also an activation of the c-myc oncogene. These two genes are important mechanisms for the conversion of a benign adenoma to a malignant one, adenoma with in situ carcinoma or Class III adenoma. This type of adenoma becomes carcinoma and metastatic stage, throughout inactivation of several tumor suppressor genes. Besides the hereditary APC alteration and other acquired genetic changes as described above there are other associated genetics, antigenics, and enzymes that have an important role in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Several carcinogenic factors have been described which also contribute in the adenoma and carcinoma formation: ulcerative colitis, acromegaly, familial history of colonic neoplasia, certain professions, smoking and drinking, consumption of red or processed meat, etc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenoma↗

Role of epoxide hydrolase, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, cytochrome P450 2E1 or alcohol dehydrogenase genotypes in susceptibility to colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer in Western countries. CRC has been associated with genetic and lifestyle factors. Individual susceptibility to CRC may be due partly to variations in detoxification capacity in the gastrointestinal tract. Genetic polymorphisms in detoxification enzymes may result in variations in detoxification activities, which subsequently might influence the levels of toxic/carcinogenic compounds, and this may influence the risk for CRC. Therefore, we determined whether polymorphisms in the genes coding for microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH3) predispose to the development of CRC. DNA samples were obtained from 371 patients with sporadic CRC and 415 healthy controls. Patients and controls were all of Caucasian origin. All genetic polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction, eventually followed by restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism analyses, except for the EPHX1 codon 113 polymorphism, which was genotyped by an allele-specific discrimination assay. Calculation of crude Odds Ratios (ORs) revealed an increased risk for CRC associated with variant NQO1 (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0) and CYP2E1 intron 6 genotypes (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8). However, after adjustment for age and gender, logistic regression analyses only showed a statistically significant risk for CRC associated with variant NQO1 genotypes (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.03-2.4). No associations were found between CRC and the other polymorphic genes as mentioned above. In conclusion, these data suggest that the presence of variant NQO1 genotypes, with expected reduced enzyme activities might enhance susceptibility to CRC.

Adult↗

Glutathione S-transferase T1 polymorphisms are associated with outcome in colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of mortality accounting for approximately 10% of all deaths from malignancy in the western world. Polymorphism in the glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 gene has been associated with CRC risk in some but not all studies. In this study, we examined associations between GSTT1 genotypes and CRC risk, and prognosis in 361 cases and 881 unrelated controls. GSTT1 null was associated with a small but significant increase in risk (P = 0.0006, odds ratio (OR) = 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-2.24). GSTT1 null was also associated with a significantly younger age at diagnosis (mean 65.2 years) compared with GSTT1 A (mean 67.6 years, P = 0.031). There were no significant associations between GSTT1 genotypes and clinical factors (e.g. Dukes stage, differentiation and tumour node metastasis classification) in the total case group. However, following stratification by age (<70 versus > or =70 years at diagnosis), in the patients diagnosed <70 years of age, GSTT1 null was more common in Dukes grade A/B tumours (P = 0.046), stage T1/T2 tumours (P = 0.053) and those with a pushing margin (P = 0.066). We also identified associations between GSTT1 null and increased prevalence of host lymphocyte response, particularly in the younger patients (P = 0.036). Furthermore, GSTT1 null was associated with improved survival in younger patients (P = 0.017, hazards ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.31-0.89) but poorer survival in older patients (P = 0.017, HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.12-3.20). We proposed a model based on the dual functionality of GSTT1 to explain these contrasting results. We suggest that the null genotype is associated with improved immune response in younger patients, but poorer detoxification in older patients. These findings may also provide an explanation for the contrasting finding of other studies on the role of this gene in CRC.

Aged↗

Symposium on colorectal cancer. 1. Pathology of colorectal cancer.

Most colorectal cancers arise from pre-existing adenomas (the adenoma-carcinoma sequence). The histology, cytology and malignant potential of the adenoma group of tumours are described. From a study of the life history of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in cases of both familial polyposis and isolated adenoma it would appear that most colorectal cancers evolve over a long period. The adenoma is important as a marker for increased risk of colorectal cancer, in clinical practice and in epidemiologic studies. Local excision for carefully selected early colorectal cancers is justified on the basis of the results of a long-term prospective study.

Adenoma↗

Prognostic factors and survival of patients aged less than 45 years with colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancers in 92 patients aged 45 years and under presenting over a 20-year period (1970-1990) were studied. A delay of more than 4 months in presentation was seen in 27 per cent of patients. All underwent surgery, 14 per cent emergency and 86 per cent elective, and follow-up was available for 91 patients. Overall, 14 per cent of patients had Dukes A tumours, 32 per cent Dukes B, 36 per cent Dukes C and 18 per cent Dukes 'D'. Local recurrence occurred in eight (9 per cent) of the 92 patients and overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 61 and 59 per cent. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for local recurrence to be mucinous carcinoma (relative effect 4.9) and the presence of intramural vascular invasion by tumour (relative effect 9.4). For overall survival, independent risk factors were involvement of the regional lymph nodes by tumour (relative effect 2.0), extramural invasion by tumour cells (relative effect 3.0), tumour size (relative effect 1.8) and the presence of metastatic disease at initial diagnosis (relative effect 3.7).

Adolescent↗

Screening of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a cancer in a disappointing location. However, its location clearly has an advantage that could theoretically permit efficient secondary prevention: the preceding of the cancer by a benign lesion, ie, the adenoma. Complete colonoscopy and its substitute, the double-contrast barium enema, and their specific limitations, must be reserved for high-risk patients: hereditary cancers and ulcerative colitis. For all the others, ie, adults of 45 years of age and with standard risks, the proposal is either to select the patients to be colonoscoped through occult blood testing of the stools or to perform a fiber sigmoidoscopy or a combination of both. Although imperfect, both methods allow the detection of polyps and cancers at a presymptomatic stage, when they are either benign or malignant, but localized and with a better prognosis. However, the absolute proof of the benefits of this strategy of screening would be the demonstration by controlled studies of a prolonged survival rate or a decrease in morbidity. Until now, this proof is not fully available.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a preventable disease. We currently have the means to substantially decrease the incidence and mortality from this disease; we simply need to implement primary and secondary prevention measures. I encourage patients to eat a diet low in meat and high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber. I also encourage patients to avoid obesity and engage in a regular exercise program. I routinely screen persons at average risk using fecal occult blood tests or flexible sigmoidoscopy after the age of 50 years. Those at higher risk by virtue of family history, a personal history of ulcerative colitis, or previous adenoma should have colonoscopy performed using a schedule tailored to their risk profile.

Journal Article↗

How good is screening for colorectal cancer?

Colorectal cancer is potentially preventable. Use of fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and a combination of air-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy has proved to be a safe, relatively inexpensive approach to detecting colon cancer in its early stages, decreasing morbidity and increasing survival. Future work in secondary prevention of colon cancer should be aimed at standardized trials of fecal occult blood agents, thus optimizing the yield of localized lesions and decreasing the cost so that mass screening becomes possible. Major efforts should be aimed at educating physicians and the public alike. Primary prevention will deserve greater emphasis when specific risk factors pathogenetic of colon cancer are discovered.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Current perspectives on immunotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer immunotherapy is currently under investigation as a potential adjuvant treatment. There are a number of approaches that come under this heading. Active nonspecific immunotherapy aims to stimulate the immune system as a whole, without targeting any individual tumor-associated antigen (TAA), while adoptive immunotherapy takes either tumor-infiltrating or peripheral blood lymphocytes and stimulates them with cytokine prior to reinfusion back into the patient. Monoclonal antibodies are designed to target specific TAA and cause tumor cell death by apoptosis, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or complement. The most diverse approach, however, involves attempting to stimulate the immune system to target cancer cells and is known as active specific immunotherapy. This includes peptide vaccines, anti-idiotypic antibodies, mucin, DNA/RNA (polynucleotide-mediated immunization) and heat shock protein-based vaccines, as well as viral vectors.

Journal Article↗

Metabolic epidemiology of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer, one of the "diseases of western civilisation", is a multistage process in which the first stage is the formation of a benign adenoma, followed by adenoma growth, increasing severity of epithelial dysplasia, and finally carcinoma. Adenoma formation is caused by environmental factors, probably acting primarily on a genetically predisposed fraction of the population. Adenoma growth is probably caused by a bacterial metabolite of the bile acids, the concentration of which is increased by dietary fat or meat and decreased by fibre. This probably acts in concert with hormonal factors. Similar factors are probably responsible for the increasing severity of epithelial dysplasia.

Adenoma↗

[Therapy of recurrent colorectal cancers].

Colorectal cancers treated for cure by operative means show tumour recurrences and metastases in about 20% of the patients. Of these colon or rectal cancers 75 and 90% respectively can be only operated for palliation. These patients have a better prognosis than those operated primarily for palliation. 25% of the cases especially with suture line recurrences can be operated upon radically enough and exhibit a total five year survival rate of 50%.

Colectomy↗

A search for germline APC mutations in early onset colorectal cancer or familial colorectal cancer with normal DNA mismatch repair.

Twenty percent of colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise in people who have a family history of CRC in at least one other relative. Although a fraction of these CRCs are explained by two well-described autosomal dominant syndromes-5% by hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and 1% by familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)-the cause of the remaining 14% of familial aggregates of CRC is unknown. Many cases of HNPCC are due to germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, leading to the tumor phenotype of microsatellite instability (MSI), and most cases of FAP are caused by germline APC mutations. To date, non-FAP familial CRC aggregates have not been evaluated for germline APC mutations. In this study, we examined the involvement of germline APC mutations in 79 individuals with CRC who had early-age onset of their cancer (age < 50 years) and/or a family history of CRC. Cases with FAP or HNPCC due to defective mismatch repair were excluded from the study. Using conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and the protein truncation test as the screening methods, no functionally significant germline mutations were detected for any of the cases. An apparently silent polymorphism resulting in a 1-bp alteration of A --> G (proline --> proline) in exon 4 was observed. Additionally, four intervening sequence (IVS) alterations were detected: IVS2-53t-->c in 3 cases; IVS4-17ins T in 3 cases; IVS5+32t-->c in 16 cases; and IVS5+33g-->a in 1 case. All appeared to be polymorphisms present in similar proportions in an average-risk population. We conclude that germline APC mutations do not account for familial MSS (stable microsatellite) CRC associated with few synchronous polyps.

Adult↗

Inverse effects of mucin on survival of matched hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To compare survival and histologic features of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; Lynch syndrome) cases to well-matched sporadic colon cancers from the same patient population. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Between January 1995 and March 2002, a total of 5,138 consecutive patients underwent resection of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma in a single institution. According to the Amsterdam criteria, 56 HNPCC patients were matched to 147 sporadic colorectal cancer (SCRC) with no family history of cancer and with the same gender, tumor location, and age within 3 years. Immunohistochemical analyses were done for MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, and MUC5AC. RESULTS: The HNPCC group had a marginally significantly better long-term outcome than the SCRC group (P = 0.058). The trend disappeared after adjustment by tumor-node-metastasis stage in a Cox model (P = 0.774). We noted a difference of >50% in the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of HNPCC- and SCRC-mucinous groups (92% versus 31%, P = 0.0003). Interaction between mucin and HNPCC and its effects on survival were further confirmed by comparing the Cox models with and without interaction terms (hazard ratio, 0.1; P = 0.034 with adjusting stage). Patients with tumors showing dual expression of mucin and MUC1, which appeared in 11% of those with HNPCC and 50% of those with SCRC, had a lower 5-year cancer-specific survival rate than patients without (30% versus 60%; P = 0.004 by log-rank test; P = 0.039 with adjustment for tumor-node-metastasis stage). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mucin has an inverse effect on survival in patients with HNPCC and SCRC, which might be partly explained by a lower prevalence of MUC1 expression in the mucinous HNPCC group than in the SCRC groups.

Aged↗

The macrophage migration inhibition (MIF) assay as a marker of colorectal cancer. Studies in patients with colorectal cancer, noncolonic neoplasms, and conditions predisposing to colorectal cancer.

A specific macrophage migration inhibition assay, using patient lymphocytes incubated with a human colonic cancer extract, was studied in 92 patients with proven colorectal cancer and in 134 other individuals (20 normal controls, 80 patients with various nonmalignant gastrointestinal diseases, and 34 patients with extracolonic malignancies). A positive response was obtained in 78 of 92 colorectal cancer patients, but in none of the 20 normal controls. A positive response occurred in four of 34 patients with extracolonic malignancies and in approximately half of patients with colonic adenomas and in one third of patients with ulcerative colitis. The significance of positive results in these patients (with diseases considered premalignant) is unclear, and is being studied further. In patients with previous resection of colorectal cancers, positive responses were frequent during the first year following resection, and rare thereafter. The results suggest that this method may be useful as a clinical marker for colorectal cancer, and warrants further technical refinement and study of specific patient populations.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗