Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clarithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

In vitro and in vivo influence of adjunct clarithromycin on the treatment of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Recent in vitro and in vivo data have substantiated the beneficial effects of macrolides/ azalides for use against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While macrolides/azalides are not very potent in vitro antimicrobial agents against this pathogen, they appear to have an adjunctive role by either altering the course of infection owing to their inhibition of biofilm production or modulation of the host anti-inflammatory response, or both. To determine the in vitro and in vivo effects of clarithromycin as adjunctive therapy with ceftazidime against a mucoidproducing strain of P. aeruginosa, we performed a standard time-kill experiment and a pneumonia model in mice, respectively. Time-kill studies were performed over a 24 h period with varying concentrations of clarithromycin and ceftazidime alone or in combination. Synergic activity was noted with the use of 0.5 x MIC of ceftazidime combined with either 0.5 or 2 x MIC of clarithromycin. Neutropenic mice were infected with 10(8) cfu of mucoid P. aeruginosa intranasally to produce pneumonia and subsequently treated with oral clarithromycin (100 mg/kg) and/or sc ceftazidime (1500 mg/kg) as monotherapy or in combination. The addition of 5 days of clarithromycin to the ceftazidime regimen significantly improved survival as compared with the beta-lactam alone (48% versus 32%, P = 0.04). While a statistically significant difference was not detected with the addition of 3 days of clarithromycin therapy, a trend towards improved survival was noted with this regimen (38% versus 32%). These data demonstrate the adjunctive potential of clarithromycin when administered in combination with an antipseudomonal agent for the treatment of mucoid-producing Pseudomonas in acute respiratory infection.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

In vitro susceptibilities of Rickettsia and Bartonella spp. to 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin as determined by immunofluorescent antibody analysis of infected vero cell monolayers.

The in vitro susceptibilities of Rickettsia akari, Rickettsia conorii, Rickettsia prowazekii, Rickettsia rickettsii, Bartonella elizabethae, Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana to different concentrations of clarithromycin, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin (the primary metabolite of clarithromycin) and tetracycline in Vero cell cultures, were determined by enumeration of immunofluorescently-stained bacilli. The extent of antibiotic-induced inhibition of foci was recorded for each dilution of antibiotic and compared with an antibiotic-negative control. Based upon MIC data, clarithromycin alone is highly active against all three Bartonella spp., R. akari and R. prowazekii, while 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin is active against R. conorii, R. prowazekii and R. rickettsii. Further testing is warranted in animal models and human clinical trials, to examine the activity of both clarithromycin and its primary metabolite and to define further the role of clarithromycin in therapy, particularly of infections caused by obligate intracellular bacteria such as Rickettsia and Bartonella spp.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Five day clarithromycin modified release versus 10 day penicillin V for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: A multicentre, comparative, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin modified release (MR) versus penicillin V for pharyngitis due to group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS). METHODS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients (12-40 years) with acute pharyngotonsillitis and a positive Streptococcus A antigen immunoassay test were randomized to receive clarithromycin MR 500 mg od for 5 days or penicillin 590 mg tds for 10 days. Patients were clinically evaluated and a throat swab for culture obtained before treatment, after treatment (day 8 or 13 depending on the treatment arm) and at the follow-up visit (day 30). The main criterion for efficacy was the bacteriological cure rate after treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients were considered for the intent-to-treat analysis. After treatment, clinical cure rates were 88.1% in the clarithromycin group and 92.4% in the penicillin group, and eradication rates were 82.8% and 83.6%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments. Three hundred and three (87%) patients had a positive culture before treatment, among which 29 (9.7%) were found to be clarithromycin resistant. Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were clinically and bacteriologically evaluable for per protocol analysis. After treatment, clinical cure rates were 95.2% in the clarithromycin group and 97.3% in the penicillin group, and eradication rates were 94.4% and 92%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was shown. Adverse events occurred in 46 patients of the clarithromycin group and 31 of the penicillin group (with no statistical difference). Most of them were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin MR administered once daily for 5 days is as safe and effective as penicillin V administered three times a day for 10 days in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Clarithromycin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-8 production by human monocytes through AP-1 and NF-kappa B transcription factors.

Erythromycin and other macrolides are effective for the treatment of chronic inflammatory airway diseases such as diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB) and chronic sinusitis. The effect of macrolides in DPB is suggested to be anti-inflammatory rather than antibacterial. We investigated the effects of clarithromycin on interleukin-8 (IL-8) production using human peripheral monocytes and the human monocytic leukaemia cell line, THP-1. Bacterial extracts from Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Helicobacter pylori, as well as E. coli-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS), induced IL-8 production. Clarithromycin suppressed this production in a dose-dependent manner in both monocytes and THP-1 cells (49.3-75.0% inhibition at 10 mg/L). A luciferase reporter gene assay with plasmids containing a serially deleted IL-8 promoter fragment showed that both the activator protein-1 (AP-1) and/or the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kapp aB) binding sequences were responsible for the LPS and clarithromycin responsiveness of the IL-8 promoter. Consistently, in an electromobility shift assay, LPS increased the specific binding of both AP-1 and NF-kappaB, whereas clarithromycin suppressed it. Moreover, LPS and clarithromycin regulated three other promoters that have either the NF-kappa B or the AP-1 binding sequences: two synthetic (pAP-1-Luc and pNF-kappa B-Luc) and one naturally occurring (ELAM-Luc). Our results indicate that clarithromycin modified inflammation by sup-pressing IL-8 production and that clarithromycin may affect the expression of other genes through AP-1 and NF-kappa B. In addition to treatment of airway diseases, the anti-inflammatory effect of macrolides may be beneficial for the treatment of other inflammatory diseases such as chronic gastritis caused by H. pylori.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1993

Comparative safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and cefadroxil suspensions in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin structure infections in children.

A prospective, randomized, single (investigator) blind multicenter study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and cefadroxil oral suspensions in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin structure infections in children. Male and female patients ages 6 months to 12 years were enrolled at 24 study centers in the United States. Patients had signs and symptoms consistent with mild to moderate skin or skin structure infections judged suitable for oral antimicrobial therapy. Clarithromycin oral suspension was given to 118 children in a dose of 7.5 mg/kg (maximum of 500 mg) twice daily; cefadroxil oral suspension was given to 113 children in a dose of 15 mg/kg (maximum of 1000 mg) twice daily. Among clinically evaluable patients clinical success rates (cure plus improvement) were 96% (71 of 74) for clarithromycin and 98% (83 of 85) for cefadroxil (P = 0.664). Bacteriologic cure rates in evaluable clarithromycin and cefadroxil patients were 96% (72 of 75) and 99% (89 of 90), respectively (P = 0.331). Pathogen eradication rates based on 204 evaluable pathogens were 97% in the clarithromycin group and 99% in the cefadroxil group (P = 0.326). Adverse events were mild or moderate and were reported in 25% of clarithromycin and 35% of cefadroxil patients (P = 0.085). In both groups adverse events involved primarily the digestive tract. No significant laboratory changes were noted. Clarithromycin oral suspension appears to be a safe and effective alternative to cefadroxil for the treatment of pediatric skin and skin structure infections.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media.

Clarithromycin is a new macrolide antibiotic that is active in vitro against a variety of organisms that are responsible for acute otitis media in children. The parent compound is metabolized to microbiologically active 14-hydroxy clarithromycin, which is especially active against Haemophilus influenzae. The safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and amoxicillin suspensions were compared in the treatment of acute otitis media in children 1 to 12 years of age inclusive. This was a Phase III, single blind (investigator-blind), randomized, multicenter clinical trial. Clarithromycin oral suspension was given in a dose of 7.5 mg/kg (maximum, 500 mg) twice daily, and amoxicillin suspension in a dose of 20 mg/kg (maximum, 750 mg) was given twice daily for 7 to 10 days in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical evaluations were performed pretreatment, within 48 hours posttreatment and 10 to 14 days posttreatment. Myringotomy was performed in every child to obtain a microbiologic sample pretreatment and at subsequent visits as clinically indicated. A total of 79 children were enrolled, 39 in the clarithromycin and 40 in the amoxicillin treatment group. Thirty-two children were excluded from the efficacy analysis for various reasons. Clinical success (cure and improvement) rates at 0 to 4 days posttreatment were 93% for clarithromycin and 90% for amoxicillin (P > 0.999). Altogether 17 children (10 receiving clarithromycin, 7 receiving amoxicillin) experienced some adverse event, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common complaint. No clinically significant differences in laboratory tests were found between the groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Clarithromycin and cefaclor suspensions in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

The safety and efficacy of a new oral suspension formulation of clarithromycin were evaluated in this multicenter, Phase III, single blind, comparative trial in 379 children ages 6 months to 12 years with signs or symptoms of acute otitis media. Children were randomized to receive a 10-day course of clarithromycin oral suspension (7.5 mg/kg; maximum, 500 mg) or cefaclor oral suspension (20 mg/kg; maximum, 500 mg) twice daily. Specific clinical response criteria were developed based on pretreatment signs and symptoms and results of tympanometry. Of the 379 enrolled patients 281 (74%) were evaluable (clarithromycin, 150; cefaclor, 131). There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Fifty percent of the patients had 2 to 4 episodes of otitis media (including the current episode) in the past 12 months; 63% of the patients had an infection of moderate severity. Clarithromycin and cefaclor suspensions were similarly effective for the treatment of acute otitis media. Clinical success (cure, cure with effusion or improvement) was achieved in 86% of clarithromycin-treated patients and 90% of cefaclor-treated patients. The majority of bacterial isolates for which susceptibility results were available were fully or moderately susceptible to the study drugs (96% clarithromycin, 92% cefaclor). Both drugs were well-tolerated; adverse events considered probably study drug-related were reported by 30 (15%) of clarithromycin recipients and 31 (17%) of cefaclor recipients. There were no significant differences between the groups in the numbers of patients reporting events that were thought to be related to study medication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Prevalence and rapid identification of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates in children.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are generally time-consuming and not a routine in many hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains in children, to identify those isolates via rapid methodology and to examine the severity of gastritis caused by the antibiotic-resistant H. pylori isolates. METHODS: Enrolled were 245 children investigated for H. pylori infection by endoscopic examination. The gastric antral specimens were subjected to DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) with primers specific to the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene. Conventional bacterial cultures were performed simultaneously as the diagnostic standard. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of clarithromycin and metronidazole were determined by E test. This was used as a standard to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the above PCR-RFLP assay. The specimens were processed for histologic examination and evaluated by the updated Sydney system. RESULTS: H. pylori was isolated in 67 of the 245 children; 12 (18%) of them were clarithromycin-resistant and 6 (9%) were metronidazole-resistant. No difference in histologic examinations was noted between the antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible strains. We performed PCR-RFLP with all 12 clarithromycin-resistant isolates: 10 had a 23S ribosomal RNA A2144G point mutation; 1 had a mixture of an A2143G point mutant and susceptible strains; and 1 had neither of the 2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori isolates in Taiwanese children is 18%. PCR-RFLP had a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (100%) for the clarithromycin resistance gene mutation determination. The dominant mutation is A2144G. PCR-RFLP provides a rapid and accurate approach to detect clarithromycin-resistant strains within 24 h.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

A randomized prospective comparison of clarithromycin versus amoxycillin in combination with omeprazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

AIM: To compare H. pylori eradication rates using omeprazole in conjunction with either amoxycillin or clarithromycin. BACKGROUND: Omeprazole with amoxycillin is the most widely used dual therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori. A recent open study suggested a high eradication rate combining omeprazole with the newer macrolide, clarithromycin. METHODS: A randomized prospective trial in 54 patients was conducted to compare 2 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg once daily and either amoxycillin 500 mg three times daily or clarithromycin 500 mg three times daily. H. pylori eradication was assessed using the 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: Eradication was achieved in 18/26 (69.2%) of subjects treated with omeprazole and amoxycillin and 18/25 (72.0%) of those treated with omeprazole and clarithromycin (P = N.S.). Minor side effects, most commonly altered taste, were reported by 16% of patients and were more frequent in those randomized to clarithromycin (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These regimens are similarly effective. However, clarithromycin is more expensive, associated with a greater frequency of side effects and, unlike amoxycillin, resistance by H. pylori has been reported. This suggests that clarithromycin may be a useful alternative when there is penicillin allergy or previous treatment failure, but it should not replace amoxycillin as first choice in omeprazole-based dual therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention of recurrence of duodenal ulcer: a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre trial of omeprazole with or without clarithromycin.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication is currently recommended for all patients with duodenal ulcer disease, but consensus on the best treatment is lacking. METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multi-centre study. Patients received omeprazole 40 mg daily for 28 days and either clarithromycin 500 mg t.d.s. or placebo t.d.s. for the first 14 days. Patients underwent endoscopy before starting treatment, at 2 weeks, immediately after stopping treatment if unhealed at 2 weeks, and at 1, 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment, or at the recurrence of symptoms. Eradication of H. pylori, duodenal ulcer healing and ulcer recurrence were measured. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-four patients were recruited and randomized to omeprazole plus clarithromycin (n = 74) or to omeprazole plus placebo (n = 80). One month after treatment, H. pylori was eradicated in 57 of 69 (83%; 95% CI: 72-91%) patients receiving omeprazole plus clarithromycin, compared with 1 of 75 (1%; 95% CI: 0-7%) receiving omeprazole alone (P < 0.001). In patients receiving omeprazole plus clarithromycin the ulcer healed at 2 weeks in 83% (95% CI: 71-91%) and at 4 weeks in 100% (95% CI: 95-100%), compared with 77% (95% CI: 66-86%) and 97% (95% CI: 91-100%) in those given omeprazole plus placebo (N.S.). Ulcers recurred at 12 months in 6% (95% CI: 1-16%) of patients given omeprazole plus clarithromycin, compared with 76% (95% CI: 63-86%) of patients given omeprazole plus placebo (P < 0.001). The incidence of side-effects was similar in both treatment groups (38% with clarithromycin dual therapy and 29% with omeprazole plus placebo; P = 0.304). Ninety per cent of patients took at least 90% of their prescribed medication. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole plus clarithromycin dual therapy eradicated H. pylori in 83% of patients with duodenal ulcer and significantly decreased 12-month recurrence from 76% to 6%.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Low dose of clarithromycin in triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: one or two weeks?

The aims of this pilot study were: (i) to compare the efficacy of low-dose clarithromycin (250 mg twice daily) for 1 or 2 weeks; and (ii) to evaluate possible therapeutic advantages in associating the low-dose clarithromycin with an anti-secretory agent or tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate (De Nol; Yamanouchi Pharm, Corugate Milano, Italy). A prospective, randomized, open trial was carried out on consecutive outpatients with dyspeptic symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection. We enrolled 129 patients in one of the following schedules: (A) De Nol 120 mg q.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks; (B) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks; or (C) omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.i.d. for 1 week. Results were evaluated by Per Protocol (PP) and Intention-To-Treat analysis (ITT). Eradication rate was 100% after treatment A, 92.6% after treatment B and 86.5% after treatment C by PP and 83.3, 75.7, and 68.1%, respectively by ITT. Side effects were reported by 16 subjects: 26.6% in group A; 9.1% in group B; and 7.5% in group C; in two cases side effects led to the withdrawal of the treatment. In conclusion, 500 mg clarithromycin per day in association with omeprazole and metronidazole, for 1 week gave comparable results to the same schedule for a 2 week period. The use of clarithromycin with bismuth and metronidazole produced a therapeutic gain compared with both of the anti-secretory schedules, although this was not statistically significant.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Susceptibilities to clarithromycin, amoxycillin and metronidazole of Helicobacter pylori isolates from the antrum and corpus in Tokyo, Japan, 1995-2001.

The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibilities to clarithromycin, amoxycillin and metronidazole of Helicobacter pylori isolates from the antrum and corpus of Japanese patients examined during the period 1995-2001. There was an increase, from 6.2% in 1995 to 22.1% in 2000-2001, in the proportion of patients infected with clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori. Of patients infected with clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori, 39.1% were infected with both clarithromycin-susceptible and -resistant H. pylori. Furthermore, the MIC90 of clarithromycin for H. pylori rose from < 1 mg/L in 1995-1998 to 8 mg/L in 1999. In contrast, the MIC90s of amoxycillin and metronidazole were < or = 0.125 and 4 mg/L, respectively, throughout the study period. The results showed that, while most H. pylori isolates were susceptible to amoxycillin and metronidazole, resistance to clarithromycin among H. pylori isolates increased markedly in Japan during 1995-2001. The results also indicated a need to test the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates from more than two samples obtained from two different sites in the stomach of a single patient in order to diagnose the presence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori correctly.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

One week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: does high-dose clarithromycin confer additional benefit?

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin, a new acid stable macrolide antibiotic with proven efficacy against Helicobacter pylori, has been widely incorporated into eradication regimens but its optimal dosage schedule remains controversial. The standard dose of clarithromycin is 250 mg twice daily. METHODS: In a prospective study designed to evaluate the helicobactericidal efficacy, patient acceptability, and ulcer healing efficacy of a triple therapy regimen incorporating high dose clarithromycin, 100 consecutive patients with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily in combination with metronidazole 400 mg twice daily and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for seven days. H. pylori status was assessed before and at least 4 weeks after therapy by rapid urease test and histology. Adverse events and compliance were assessed by direct questioning. RESULTS: Only two patients failed to attend for repeat endoscopy, leaving 98 evaluable patients. Of these, 94 were H. pylori-negative after therapy, giving an intention-to-treat eradication rate of 94% (95% confidence interval, 89%-99%). The ulcer healing rate was 92% (86%-98%), and ulcer healing was significantly associated with H. pylori eradication (p < 0.01). Adverse events were reported by 33% of patients of which nausea was the commonest (14%). Noncompliance with therapy was significantly associated with H. pylori treatment failure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Seven day triple therapy incorporating high dose clarithromycin effectively eradicates H. pylori and heals ulcers, but it is disadvantaged by a relatively high rate of adverse events. In view of these findings and the fact that no direct comparison to date has shown increased efficacy from high dose clarithromycin, we would recommend continued use of low dose clarithromycin when combined with omeprazole and a nitroimidazole.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Autobacteriographic studies of clarithromycin and erythromycin in mice.

The antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin was compared with that of erythromycin in experimentally infected mice by whole-body autobacteriography. In mice with systemic staphylococcal infections, the number of vital microbes in the body was relatively low in the early period after oral administration of erythromycin, but increased thereafter to the levels found in nonmedicated control mice. On the other hand, with clarithromycin treatment, a significantly smaller number of microbes was evident throughout the body. The microbes were scarcely seen in the parenchyma of any organs during the examination period. This potent antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin compared with that of erythromycin was further demonstrated in mice with respiratory infections. On the other hand, to examine the distribution properties of both antibiotics in the whole body, an autoradiographic study was carried out with [N-methyl-14C]clarithromycin and [N-methyl-14C]erythromycin. Both labeled antibiotics were distributed widely throughout the body after oral administration in both uninfected control mice and mice with systemic infections. However, the radioactivity was more marked and persistent for [14C]clarithromycin than it was for [14C]erythromycin, particularly in the lungs. The observations described above indicate the superior in vivo antimicrobial activity of clarithromycin compared with that of erythromycin and suggest that the superiority of clarithromycin is largely attributed to its favorable distribution properties. The advantages of whole-body autobacteriography, coupled with whole-body autoradiography, are discussed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Activities of clarithromycin, sulfisoxazole, and rifabutin against Mycobacterium avium complex multiplication within human macrophages.

The activities of clarithromycin, sulfisoxazole, and rifabutin against three virulent strains of Mycobacterium avium complex isolated from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome were evaluated in a model of intracellular infection. Human monocyte-derived macrophages were infected at day 6 of culture with M. avium complex. Intracellular bacteria were counted 60 min after inoculation. Extra- and intracellular bacteria were counted at days 4 and 7 after inoculation. The concentrations used were 4 micrograms of clarithromycin per ml (MICs for the three strains, 4, 4, and 4 micrograms/ml), 50 micrograms of sulfisoxazole per ml (MICs, 50, 25, and 25 micrograms/ml), and 0.5 micrograms of rifabutin per ml (MICs, 2, 0.5, and 0.5 micrograms/ml). Compared with controls, clarithromycin and rifabutin slowed the intracellular replication of the three strains (at day 7 after inoculation, P was less than 0.01 for the first strain and less than 0.001 for the two others). Sulfisoxazole was ineffective against the three strains. Clarithromycin was as effective as rifabutin. Clarithromycin plus rifabutin was as effective as each single agent. Clarithromycin plus sulfisoxazole was as effective as clarithromycin alone.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1992

Activities of four macrolides, including clarithromycin, against Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium chelonae, and M. chelonae-like organisms.

Susceptibilities to erythromycin by broth microdilution were compared with those to the newer macrolide clarithromycin for 223 isolates of rapidly growing mycobacteria belonging to seven taxonomic groups. Seventy-nine random isolates were also tested against azithromycin and roxithromycin. The MIC of clarithromycin for 90% of strains tested (MIC90) was 0.25 microgram/ml for isolates of Mycobacterium chelonae subsp. chelonae and 0.5 microgram/ml for M. chelonae subsp. abscessus, with 100% of strains inhibited by less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml. Clarithromycin was 10 to 50 times more active than erythromycin and four- to eightfold more active than the other newer macrolides against M. chelonae. MICs of clarithromycin frequently increased with prolonged incubation with isolates of M. chelonae subsp. abscessus but not M. chelonae subsp. chelonae. MICs of clarithromycin were much higher for M. fortuitum bv. fortuitum (MIC50, 2.0 microgram/ml; MIC90, greater than 8.0 microgram/ml). The three newer macrolides had comparable activity against M. fortuitum bv. peregrinum (MIC90s of 0.5 to 2.0 microgram/ml compared with erythromycin MIC90s of greater than 8.0 microgram/ml). Overall, clarithromycin was the most active agent, inhibiting all isolates of M. chelonae subsp. chelonae, M. chelonae subsp. abscessus, M. fortuitum bv. peregrinum, and the M. chelonae-like organisms and 35% of M. fortuitum bv. fortuitum at less than or equal to 1 microgram/ml. Clinical trials of the newer macrolides, especially clarithromycin, against these environmental mycobacterial species appear to be warranted.

Azithromycin↗
PubMed1993

Clarithromycin therapy of experimental Treponema pallidum infections in hamsters.

Clarithromycin was shown to be effective therapy for Treponema pallidum infections in hamsters. Clarithromycin therapy was effective when initiated either 1 or 8 days after infection. The delay in initiation of therapy allowed an active infection to develop. The treponemal burden in lymph tissue of treated hamsters was eradicated, as determined by dark-field microscopy and by inoculation of lymph material into susceptible hamsters. Treatments with clarithromycin and the 14-hydroxy metabolite of clarithromycin were equally effective. Therapy with clarithromycin and penicillin was not antagonistic and did not appear to be synergistic when the two drugs were given concurrently. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of clarithromycin in hamsters showed that the doses which produced effective therapy yielded concentrations in serum similar to those routinely achieved in human sera. These findings demonstrate that clarithromycin is effective in treating active or incubating syphilis in the hamster model and could be useful in treating humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of antimicrobial activities of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin against three strains of Haemophilus influenzae by using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate the in vivo pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin in order to generate time-kill curves for three clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae (isolates 2019, 91-183, and 1746). Representative concentrations in serum or lung tissue and the pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and the 14-hydroxy metabolite, separately and in combination, were simulated for the time-kill studies. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was used as a control drug. The simulation of typical concentrations of the macrolides in serum in time-kill studies resulted in magnitudes of bacterial killing that were less than (for strains 2019 and 91-183, MICs = 4 mg/liter for clarithromycin and 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin) or equal to (for strain 1746, MIC = 1 mg/liter for clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin) those observed in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid studies. When typical concentrations in lung tissue were simulated, total log decreases in bacterial counts were greater than those achieved with typical concentrations in serum and, in the case of strain 1746, exceeded the magnitude observed with the control drug. In each case, the time to 3-log-unit killing was longer for the macrolides than for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Time-kill curve analyses demonstrated the presence of synergy (defined as a 2-log-unit decrease in the CFU per milliliter between the combination and the most active constituent at any time point) for the combination of clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin at simulated concentrations in serum for one strain of H. influenzae (isolate 91-183). Synergism is likely bacterial strain specific, and the presence of synergy may be dependent on the antibiotic concentrations that are tested. Evaluation of the kill curve kinetics in terms of bactericidal rate for the various starting concentrations of clarithromycin did not result in a clear demonstration of either concentration-dependent or concentration-independent bactericidal activity.

Amoxicillin↗