Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Certification”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

The changing pool of international medical graduates seeking certification training in US graduate medical education programs.

International medical graduates (IMGs) consistently represent approximately one fourth of both the physician workforce and the graduate medical education (GME) population of the United States. To enter into accredited US GME programs, IMGs must be certified by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG). Changes in the number and characteristics of those seeking certification directly affect the GME population and the future physician workforce in the United States. In July 1998, in response to concerns that IMGs might be lacking in basic clinical skills (eg, history taking, physical examinations, communicating with patients in spoken English), the ECFMG initiated a requirement that IMGs pass a clinical skills assessment (CSA) to achieve ECFMG certification. In this study we examined the pool of IMGs seeking certification, using databases reporting on all individuals beginning the certification process from 1995 through 2001. For this period, we found that the number of IMG candidates taking the Step 1 examination decreased by 45.5% (36,983 vs 16,828), and the number of IMGs registered to take Step 2 decreased by 38.1% (31 751 vs 12 122). The number of ECFMG certificates issued annually decreased, from a range of 9000 to 12,000 (1995-1998) to fewer than 6000 (1999-2001). Although the number of IMGs annually seeking and receiving certification has decreased, the quality of the applicants appears to have improved and the number of IMGs certified annually continues to adequately fill GME positions not taken by US medical graduates.

Certification↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A longitudinal description of patterns of certification in internal medicine and the subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE: To document the timings, frequencies, and outcomes of attempts at certification in internal medicine and the internal medicine subspecialties in the years following residency training for two cohorts of residents. DESIGN: Residents who had completed residency training and had been admitted to an American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certifying examination in 1982 or 1983 were tracked through the ABIM database for five years. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,568 residents were studied. Of the cohort, 79% were men, 21% were women, 79% were graduates of U.S./Canadian medical schools (USMGs), and 21% were graduates of foreign medical schools (FMGs). MAIN RESULTS: Ultimately, 85% of the residents achieved certification in internal medicine. Cumulative pass rates were 87% for men, 81% for women, 92% for USMGs, and 60% for FMGs; rates increased minimally after the second attempt. Most (87%) residents first attempted the internal medicine examination in the year in which training had been completed. Delaying the first examination was associated with lower pass rates. Half of the candidates who had passed the internal medicine examination attempted subspecialty certification. Over all nine subspecialty examinations, the two-cycle cumulative pass rate was 87%. Higher percentages of FMGs than of any other subgroup attempted subspecialty certification. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed description extends the body of knowledge about certification in internal medicine and the nine internal medicine subspecialties. Questions are raised, such as why some candidates delay the first internal medicine examination and why some residents never seek certification. Future research could explore these issues as well as explanations for the observed differences in pass rates.

Certification↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Factors that predict performance on the national certification examination for nurse-midwives.

The ACNM Certification Council is responsible for determining that the national certification examination in nurse-midwifery is not biased toward any protected group. Educational programs of nurse-midwifery have an interest in knowing that their admissions criteria and educational design have validity. Policy makers have an interest in both of these issues. Nine demographic and preadmission factors were investigated to identify their ability to predict performance on the nurse-midwifery national certification examination. This retrospective analysis included 1,046 candidates who took any one of five criterion-referenced, modified essay forms of the examination between January 1988 and April 1994. Multiple-regression analysis revealed that five factors explained 16.2% of the variance in certification examination performance. These factors included age (as age increased, scores decreased slightly), ethnicity (white and Hispanic candidates received higher scores compared with other groups), years of nursing practice prior to nurse-midwifery education (a slight positive influence for each additional year), highest educational degree obtained (those whose highest degree was the baccalaureate performed slightly better than candidates with no degree and candidates with graduate degrees), and academic level of the nurse-midwifery education program (certificate, master's, and doctoral level candidates all performed better than candidates from precertification programs; certificate candidates performed slightly better than master's candidates). However, even though these variables contributed to a statistically significant model, the actual degree of predicted difference in scores was of little practical significance. Variables that were not predictive of performance included marital status, U.S. versus foreign education either in nursing or in midwifery, and academic level of the registered nursing educational program [corrected].

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Reliability of death certificate diagnoses.

Consistency between death certificates and clinical records from 5 general hospitals in Kuwait was studied for 470 deaths with the following underlying or associated causes: hypertensive (HYP), ischaemic heart diseases (IHD), cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Direct causes were not considered since they are of little interest analytically. Only deaths with definite or most probable ascertainment were included. One cardiologist, who was provided with the WHO criteria and relevant documents on death certification, independently reviewed the records. To test the reviewer's bias and the reliability of his judgement, an adjudication process was effected by having one senior cardiologist re-review a random subsample of 140 records. The two reviewers showed good agreement. Specific diagnoses criteria for deciding the underlying cause of death in multiple morbid conditions by the reviewer were followed. Due to possible reviewer bias, we aimed at measuring the difference between initial certifiers and the reviewer rather than measuring the diagnostic accuracy of initial certifiers in reference to the reviewer. The agreement index kappa showed poor agreement between original and revised certificates. The original certificates under-estimated CVD as an underlying cause of death by 69.2%, DM by 60%, IHD by 33.5% and HYP by 31.8% in our sample. Associated causes were also consistently under-estimated by initial certifiers as compared with the reviewer. This bias calls for basing mortality statistics in Kuwait on hospital death committees' reports rather than on initial certifier death certificates, use of multiple-causes of death instead of one underlying cause and adequate training of the medical profession on the value and process of death certification.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Neonatal mortality in France: usefulness of a neonatal death certificate].

UNLABELLED: A neonatal death certificate was introduced in France in 1997. It provides detailed data on the causes of death and the characteristics of newborn, birth and parents. Our aim was to describe the new results of this certificate. METHOD: All deaths in 1999 in the first 27 days of life were included (N=2036). Certificates were analysed using the usual process, especially following the International Classification of Diseases. RESULTS: The neonatal death certificate was used for 87% of deaths. The proportion of documented items was 96% for gestational age and birthweight, 87% for maternal age and parity and 70% for maternal occupation. Almost three quarters of the deaths occurred in the first 6 days (36.9% in the first 24 hours and 35.1% between one and six days). 30.5% of the died infants were born before 27 weeks of gestation and 36.5% between 27 and 36 weeks. A shift in medical care was observed at 26 weeks, with an increase in caesarean sections before labour and newborn referrals. In all, 63.3% of neonatal deaths were due to perinatal conditions, and 27.9% to congenital anomalies. The proportion of deaths explained by congenital anomalies was higher for longer gestational age: 14% of deaths between 25 and 28 weeks of gestation vs 38 to 43% between 33 and 42 weeks. CONCLUSION: The neonatal death certificate was well accepted; however the data on detailed causes of death and parent's characteristics were insufficient. Analysis of the circumstances and the causes of death is facilitated with the neonatal death certificate and it will be developped in the future.

Cause of Death↗
PubMed2005

An international comparison study indicated physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certificate affected reported national diabetes mortality.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Physicians may find it confusing to decide whether to report diagnoses in part I or part II of the death certificate. The aim of this study was to contrast differences in diabetes mortality through a comparison of physicians' habits in reporting diabetes in part I of death certification among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden. METHODS: A cross-sectional, intercountry comparison study. We calculated the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate and the proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was selected as underlying cause of death. RESULTS: We found that half of the differences in reported diabetes mortality among Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden were due to differences in reporting deaths with mention of diabetes anywhere on the certificate, and half due to differences in proportion of deaths with mention of diabetes in which diabetes was reported in part I of the death certificate. CONCLUSION: Differences in the reporting of diabetes in part I of the death certificate among physicians in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden was one of the factors that affected differing reported diabetes mortality in Taiwan, Australia, and Sweden.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Simulation of alternatives for the Dutch Johne's disease certification-and-monitoring program.

To identify optimal method(s) for certification and subsequent monitoring of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)-unsuspected herds, certification-and-monitoring schemes were studied using a stochastic simulation model ("JohneSSim"). JohneSSim simulated the within-herd transmission and economic aspects of Map in closed Dutch dairy herds. The model was validated with field observations on Map-unsuspected herds. The current Dutch certification-and-monitoring schemes were compared with 11 alternative schemes in which individual and pooled fecal culture, ELISA, Johnin-intradermal test and gamma-IFN ELISA were used, varying the test frequency, tested age group and number of tested animals. On reaching the 'Map-free' status with the standard certification scheme, 11% of the simulated herds were not truly Map-free. Therefore, the designation 'Map-free' should be changed into, for instance, 'low-risk Map'. In the most-attractive alternative certification scheme, the 'Map-free' status was reached after four herd examinations (at 2-year intervals) consisting of serial testing of all cattle > or = 2 years of age with a pooled fecal culture and individual fecal culture of positive pools. This scheme resulted in lower total and annual discounted costs and a lower animal-level prevalence at reaching the 'Map-free' status compared to the standard scheme, assuming that there was no new introduction of the infection. Schemes to monitor the 'Map-free' status were compared, assuming that this status was reached with the standard certification scheme. In comparison to the standard monitoring scheme, none of the alternative monitoring schemes resulted in both a lower animal-level prevalence of undetected pre-existing Map infections in closed herds, and lower median annual discounted costs. Results of the model were very sensitive to the assumed sensitivity of the fecal culture test and to management measures that prevent within-herd transmission of Map. If these preventive measures were taken, the probability of undetected Map infections in closed 'Map-free' herds was decreased substantially.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMed1992

Attitudes toward certification. A pilot study.

The CNOR certification is a voluntary commitment that individual perioperative nurses make after considering financial, professional, and personal issues. The results of this survey indicate that CNOR certification is sought to fulfill personal and professional goals. A vital component in the delivery of quality perioperative patient care is the individual nurse. This is true whether or not the perioperative nurse is certified. One question is the value of the CNOR process in the validation of nurses for the delivery of perioperative patient care. It is easy to assume that if knowledge is present, the knowledge will be applied. Assumptions, however, can be misleading. These findings suggest that several nursing traits interact to promote quality perioperative patient care delivery, and CNOR certification is only one of those traits. Claims of CNOR outcomes should be based on documented support rather than assumption and speculation. Further investigation on a much larger and more inclusive scale is needed before suggesting specific changes to the present certification process. This project substantiates the process and the feasibility of conducting future studies. Using a modification of this survey tool in future studies would provide support to the reliability of these findings. This investigation shows that CNOR certification is an important topic to perioperative nursing. With current NCB:PNI proposals and other national considerations, CNOR certification will continue to be an important issue.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Validation of death certificate diagnosis of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death.

The validity of death certificate diagnosis of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death (OOH-SCD) was studied among 108,676 30- to 74-year-old residents in 5 Minnesota communities using 6-year mortality data (1985 to 1990). Among 4,244 total deaths, location of death was listed on the certificate as out of hospital in 2,035 cases. Of those, 911 were judged not to have OOH-SCD because they had actually been admitted to the hospital or were noncardiovascular deaths. Among the remaining 1,124, 254 were diagnosed as OOH-SCD using a thorough, physician-based procedure that used clinical records, autopsy reports, and an informant (next-of-kin) interview. We used only death certificate information to define OOH-SCD simply and inexpensively as ICD-9 code 427.5 (cardiac arrest) plus location of death listed as out-of-hospital. Compared with the physician diagnosis, sensitivity was only 24%, whereas specificity was 85%. When the definition of OOH-SCD was expanded to include ICD codes 410-414 (acute myocardial infarction and chronic coronary artery disease), sensitivity improved to 87%, whereas specificity became 66%. However, even with this higher sensitivity and specificity, only 27% of the cases labeled OOH-SCD by death certificate agreed with the physician diagnosis. Death certificate diagnosis of OOH-SCD included many erroneous cases, and may not have been suitable for study of etiologic factors, such as cardiac dysrhythmias. Death certificate diagnosis may be useful to assess population time trends in OOH-SCD, provided that misclassification (false-positive rate) remains constant over time.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The institutional design of forest certification standards initiatives and its influence on the role of science: the case of forest genetic resources.

In the 1990s a wide array of non-governmental certification initiatives emerged as a way to promote the sustainable management of resources in sectors such as fisheries and forestry. In this paper, we examine two related questions about these initiatives: how does the institutional design of certification initiatives affect the way science is used in the development of certification standards and in whose interest is science employed? Using the empirical case of forest certification and the specific standards various initiatives have created to address the management of forest genetic resources, we show how structural aspects of decision-making processes affects the standards adopted and the rationalization for their appropriateness. Two basic models of decision-making-stakeholder participation and technical expertise-are discussed in relation to three certification initiatives active in North America-the Canadian Standards Association, the Sustainable Forestry Initiative and the Forest Stewardship Council. By examining the standards these initiatives set for the management of forest genetic resources, we illustrate how two dimensions of science-uncertainty and the logic of cause and effect-are used to rationalize cautious and rigid versus flexible and discretionary standards for the management of forest genetic resources. Our findings indicate that the design or structure of certification decision-making processes, and their embedded balance of authority, mediate the form of standards initiatives will justify on the basis of science.

Certification↗
PubMed2003

Cause-of-death query in validation of death certification by expert panel; effects on mortality statistics in Finland, 1995.

The correctness of selection, coding and registration of underlying cause-of-death is important for the quality of mortality statistics. One measure to improve quality is the query to the certifier for verification of the underlying cause-of-death. In Finland, 3478 death certificates, 7.1% of total 49074 certifications in 1995, were considered questionable by statisticians. The expert panel at Statistics Finland was able to resolve 2813 (80.9%) of them. However, 665 (19.1%) certificates needed to be further queried from the certifier. Of these, 318 (47.8%) were re-assigned to another ICD-9 category or to the applicable three-digit category within the main category of heart and vascular diseases, resulting in changes from a 17.00-fold increase in rheumatic heart diseases (ICD-9 codes 390-398) to a decrease of about one-half (0.45-fold change) in unspecified neoplasms (codes 235-239). However, a statistically significant impact on national mortality statistics was not observed in any of applied ICD categories. Among all questionable death certificates, most prone to query of the certifier, and with a statistical significance of P<0.05, were those with no cause-of-death specified, those stating underlying cause-of-death as non-specified neoplasms (with a observed/expected ratio, O/E, of 1.69), and heart and vascular diseases (1.45), with its subcategories of ischaemic heart diseases (1.33) and other heart diseases (2.92). Death certificate validation, by expert panel consultations and query to the certifiers, and the importance of estimation of the validity of cause-of-death information on death certificates are strongly pointed out in a continuous strive for correct and reliable mortality statistics.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Validation of birth certificate data in New York State.

Vital statistics birth certificate data are an important source of information for researchers, policy makers, and state officials to evaluate the quality of care delivered to pregnant women. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of data elements being reported by the hospitals on the birth certificate record when compared to the medical record. This study used a random sample of birth certificates from two upstate and two downstate counties, in New York State, comprising a total of 100 records per county. The review assessed data elements from seven major categories: prenatal care, maternal medical risk factors, risk factors related to pregnancy, lifestyle risk factors, method of delivery, complications of labor and delivery, and infant information. Sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value assessed level of agreement between the birth certificate and the medical record. Overall, the birth certificate data reflected high specificity, because most conditions are rare. The sensitivity of the data was more varied, ranging from 0 to 100%, reflecting that if a rare condition was present it often was not documented on the birth certificate. Many of the data elements are reported accurately. However, caution should be used for data elements that are poorly reported.

Birth Certificates↗
PubMed2002

Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon's training, certification, and experience.

Background. We examined patient outcomes for colon resection to determine if they varied according to surgeon-specific factors including: (1) American Board of Surgery (ABS) certification, (2) colorectal surgery subspecialty certification, (3) site of residency training (university-based vs nonuniversity-based), and (4) years of experience since ABS certification. Methods. We performed a retrospective study of 15,427 admissions of northern Illinois residents who underwent segmental colon resection as their primary operation from 1994 to 1997 at 76 nonfederal Illinois hospitals. There were 514 surgeons. Main outcome measures were inpatient mortality, complications, and hospital length of stay. Regression analyses with mixed effects were used to assess the significance of surgeon-specific variables as a predictor of outcomes after risk adjustment for patient age, gender, emergency admission, surgeon volume, hospital site, colon pathology, and comorbid illnesses. Results. ABS-certification was associated with reduced mortality and morbidity. Increasing years of experience was associated with reduced mortality. Colorectal surgery certification and site of residency training did not significantly affect outcomes. Conclusion. We were able to link patient outcomes with surgeon's training. Certification was an important determinant of patient outcomes for colon resection. Increasing surgeon experience also had a favorable effect on outcomes, suggesting a continued learning curve subsequent to residency. (Surgery 2002;132:663-72).

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Board certification in clinical neuropsychology: a response to Rohling et al.

Board certification is intended to protect the public by identifying practitioners that have met minimum standards for education and training in their specialty or discipline. For varied reasons, clinical neuropsychology, like professional psychology as a whole, has struggled to achieve levels of board certification comparable to the medical profession. Rohling, Lees-Haley, Langhinrichsen-Rohling, & Williamson (2003) have recently published a critique of the board certification process in clinical neuropsychology as it is conducted by American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN), arguing that one reason for this failure is the overly restrictive nature of the process. In their paper, Rohling et al. provide a signal detection analysis that makes several assumptions about the process and conclude with recommendations for improving the process to better identify "competent" neuropsychologists in practice. While we agree in principle with many of their recommendations, and ABCN had, in fact, implemented several prior to publication of their article, the article contains many faulty assumptions and logical inconsistencies that we believe are harmful to constructive review of the certification process. In this article, we provide a critical review of their analysis and present new and additional data that demonstrate the procedure is not overly restrictive. A primary consideration is the low incidence of seeking board certification among professionals who identify themselves as neuropsychologists (i.e., a low application rate), rather than an overly restrictive process. We describe steps taken to improve the process and conclude that there are numerous areas of agreement with Rohling et al., including the need for ongoing review and continued improvement in the board certification process in all psychological specialties.

Certification↗
PubMed1997

Death certification in treated cases of presenile Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia in Scotland.

INTRODUCTION: although death certification data are commonly used in dementia epidemiology, their reliability has been questioned. METHODS: death certificates were available from the Registrar General for Scotland for all patients with Alzheimer's disease/presenile dementia (AD PSD) or vascular dementia (VaD) who had died in Scotland up until 31 December 1994. Primary (immediate and underlying) and contributory causes of death were noted as well as place of death. Occupations of male patients were obtained from death certificates or from case notes and classified according to the Standard Occupational Classification. Bronchopneumonia was considered a non-specific cause of death and specific causes of death were classified as: cardiac disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, neoplasms, other vascular diseases and other diseases. Place of death was recorded as psychiatric hospital, district general hospital, nursing home or private residence. RESULTS: death certificates of 398 people who had been treated for AD PSD and 348 who had been treated for VaD were identified. Bronchopneumonia was the most common immediate cause of death in the AD PSD group (70.9%) but less so for the VaD group (51.7%). For both groups place of death was associated with significant differences in pneumonia being reported as the immediate cause of death as well as specific underlying and contributory causes of death. Dementia was recorded for 90.5% of AD PSD patients but for only 49.7% of the VaD group. CONCLUSIONS: Scottish death certificate data significantly underestimate the prevalence of presenile VaD. Changes in patterns of institutional care may affect dementia rates estimated from death certificate data.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Attitudes of Ohio hospital pharmacy directors toward national voluntary pharmacy technician certification.

Ohio pharmacy directors' attitudes about national voluntary pharmacy technician certification were surveyed. In May 1996 a questionnaire was mailed to all 224 hospitals in Ohio. The questionnaire contained 29 attitudinal statements constructed as forecasts of the effects of certification; pharmacy directors were asked to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a 7-point Likert scale. The response rate was 61.4% (137 questionnaires returned). Respondents indicated modest agreement with 21 of 27 attitudinal statements and therefore had a generally positive view of certification. For example, they agreed that certification will improve technicians' knowledge, image, confidence, skills, and job satisfaction. They disagreed that certification will allow technicians to function independently, result in the replacement of pharmacist positions with technicians, or eliminate the need for on-the-job training of technicians. There were significant differences in scores between directors working at hospitals employing certified technicians and directors working at hospitals not employing certified technicians for only three statements. Overall, Ohio hospital pharmacy directors had positive attitudes about pharmacy technician certification.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Completeness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking using birth certificates and confidential questionnaires: variations by maternal attributes and infant birth weight. PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Birth certificate data frequently are used to monitor the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy. The authors used a two-sample capture-recapture method to estimate the completeness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking on birth certificates and on confidential questionnaires in six US states. Completeness of ascertainment was also examined according to maternal attributes and infant birth weight. The samples included white women who delivered a live infant between 1993 and 1995 in one of six states (Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Maine, South Carolina, or West Virginia) and who responded to a questionnaire mailed to them 2-6 months postpartum as part of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. State-specific sample sizes ranged from 2,647 to 4,795. The completeness of ascertainment ranged from 70.6% to 82.0% using birth certificates and from 86.2% to 90.3% using confidential questionnaires. In all six states, the birth certificates' completeness of ascertainment varied by maternal education and infant birth weight, and the questionnaires' completeness varied by maternal age. Both birth certificates and questionnaires underestimated the true extent of smoking during pregnancy among these white women. Differential reporting by birth weights recorded on birth certificates would result in an overestimated association between low birth weight and prenatal smoking.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Accuracy of death certificate diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic stroke. The Minnesota Heart Survey.

The validity of death certificate diagnosis of stroke and its type as the underlying cause of death was investigated in a sample of in-hospital deaths of possible stroke cases from the Minnesota Heart Survey. The 228 in-hospital deaths in 1970 and the 180 deaths in 1980 had a stroke diagnosis either on hospital discharge records or as the underlying cause of death on the death certificate. Relative to a standardized physician diagnosis, positive predictive values for the death certificate diagnosis in 1970 were 96% for all types of stroke, 59% for intracranial hemorrhage, and 87% for nonhemorrhagic stroke. The respective values in 1980 were 100%, 82%, and 97%. An increase in positive predictive values, particularly for intracranial hemorrhage between 1970 and 1980, was attributed to the increased use of computerized tomography. Sensitivity for the death certificate diagnosis in 1970 was 63% for all types of stroke, 66% for intracranial hemorrhage, and 45% for nonhemorrhagic stroke. The respective sensitivities in 1980 were 70%, 76%, and 58%. The lower sensitivity for nonhemorrhagic stroke as compared with hemorrhagic stroke was due in part to 1) frequent reporting of nonhemorrhagic stroke as a contributing cause of death rather than the underlying cause of death and 2) time from stroke onset to death. Specificity among these possible strokes was high in both years. The low sensitivity of death certificate diagnosis of stroke may reduce estimated relative risks in epidemiologic studies. Nevertheless, since the advent of widespread use of computerized tomography, a death certificate diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage versus nonhemorrhagic stroke appears to be sufficiently accurate for use in epidemiologic studies of stroke etiology.

Adult↗