Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CONTRACEPTIVES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed1977

Mortality among oral-contraceptive users. Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.

In a large prospective study carried out in the United Kingdom, the death-rate from diseases of the circulatory system in women who had used oral contraceptives was five times that of controls who had never used them; and the death-rate in those who had taken the pill continuously for 5 years or more was ten times that of the controls. The excess deaths in oral-contraceptive users were due to a wide range of vascular conditions. The total mortality-rate in women who had ever used the pill was increased by 40%, and this was due to an increase in deaths from circulatory diseases of 1 per 5000 ever-users per year. The excess was substantially greater than the death-rate from complications of pregnancy in the controls, and was double the death-rate from accidents. The excess mortality-rate increased with age, cigarette smoking, and duration of oral contraceptive use.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The impact of postpartum redundant use of contraception on contraceptive failure rates.

Redundant use of contraception occurs when periods of contraceptive use overlap with periods of reduced fecundity, and will downwardly bias estimates of contraceptive failure rates. This paper investigates this bias using calendar data from the Demographic and Health Surveys. The paper presents unadjusted and adjusted 12-month failure rates for each of nine countries. The impact of redundant use on failure rates is generally modest. It tends to be greater in Indonesia, however, where both the incidence and the duration of overlap are relatively large.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Ovarian function with the contraceptive vaginal ring or an oral contraceptive: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The effects on ovarian function of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) were compared. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was performed in 40 healthy female volunteers, who were randomized by a computer-generated list after stratification for the ovulation day in a pretreatment cycle. They received two cycles of NuvaRing (21 subjects) or a COC (30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel, 19 subjects). NuvaRing was started on cycle day 5, COC on cycle day 1. Follicular diameter, endometrial thickness and FSH, LH, 17beta-estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were determined. RESULTS: The median maximum follicular diameter (maxFD) was < or =11 mm during treatment. In the first treatment cycle the maxFD was lower in the COC than in the NuvaRing group, due to the different starting procedures. MaxFD were not different in the second treatment cycle. In both groups, E2 and progesterone levels remained low during treatment. Ovulations did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, ovarian activity was adequately suppressed. Due to the different starting procedures, lower ovarian activity was observed in the COC group in the first treatment cycle. In the second cycle, ovarian suppression was comparable with NuvaRing and COC treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Oral contraceptives and rheumatoid arthritis: new data from the Royal College of General Practitioners' oral contraception study.

From data available at April 1987 it was found that the standardised risk ratio for rheumatoid arthritis between current users of oral contraceptives and never users was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.15); the ratio between former users and never users was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.22). Important secular trends have occurred within our study population. The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis among former and never users has declined over the past two decades. Current users have not experienced this temporal trend, and the ratio between current and never users has, therefore, approached unity. These secular changes may explain why some studies have found that oral contraceptives have a protective effect, while others have been unable to show such an effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol in 9 women who received a low-dose oral contraceptive over a treatment period of 3 months and, after a wash-out phase, a single oral administration of the same contraceptive formulation.

The pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinylestradiol (EE2) were determined in 9 healthy women (age 23 to 42 years), during a treatment period of three months with a low-dose oral contraceptive, containing 0.15 mg LNG together with 0.03 mg EE2 (Microgynon). After a wash-out period of 3 months, 8 of these women received a single administration of the same formulation. The results showed that there was an increase in serum trough levels of LNG, reaching steady-state in the second half of each treatment cycle. The LNG levels achieved were about 3 to 4 times higher than anticipated on the basis of single dose administration. At the end of treatment cycles one and three, the terminal half-life of LNG was in the range of 24-26 h, while a mean value of 20 h was observed following single dose administration. An EE2-induced increase in the SHBG concentration of about 50% as compared to pretreatment values was observed during a treatment cycle. Pretreatment values were reached following the drug-free interval of 7 days between two cycles. After single dose administration, the free fraction of LNG was 1.3 +/- 0.2% and the fractions bound to SHBG and albumin were 64.1 +/- 4.2% and 34.6 +/- 4.0%, respectively. Serum protein binding of LNG did not change during chronic treatment. An about 50% reduction in total and unbound clearance of LNG was observed during chronic treatment, as compared to single dose administration. Increased SHBG binding capacity and a reduced hepatic metabolic capacity were discussed as possible causes of accumulating LNG concentrations in the serum. On the last day of treatment cycles one and three, the AUC(0-24h) values of EE2 were 728 +/- 314 and 778 +/- 318 pg x ml-1 x h, respectively, and were in keeping with data reported from others.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

An investigation on the influence of steroidal contraceptives on milk lipid and fatty acids in Hungary and Thailand. WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on oral contraceptives.

A double-blind clinical trial to examine the effects of oral and long-acting injectable contraceptive steroids on milk lipid and its fatty acid content has been done in Szeged, Hungary, and Khon-Kaen, Thailand. In Szeged, a combined and a progestin-only pill did not significantly alter total milk lipid. In Khon-Kaen, treatment with the combined pill was followed by a significant increase in the proportion of milk lipid. In the group treated with the long-acting injectable contraceptive, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), the milk lipid decreased significantly in the first six weeks in comparison with the control group and the individual pretreatment values. A similar but weaker effect was noticed with the progestin-only pill in Khon-Kaen. Few consistently significant differences were found in the shorter chain fatty acids (myristic, lauric and palmitic acids) during treatment. The percentage proportions were increased during the combined pill treatment in Szeged and Khon-Kaen, and reduced in DMPA and progestin-only treatment in Khon-Kaen milks. The possibility that these reflected a response to a milk volume decrease in the combined pill treatment and a reduction in milk lipid synthesis in association with DMPA and the progestin-only pill is discussed. In Khon-Kaen, linoleic acid (which is not synthesized in the body) was increased by comparison with the controls, as a percentage proportion of the fatty acids in the progestin-only and DMPA groups. Calculation of the amounts of linoleic acid per litre of milk revealed that there had been a significant decrease of linoleic, eicosadienoic, dihommo-gamma-linolenic, arachidonic, docosatetraenoic acids in the w6 family and alpha-linolenic acid in the w3 family in the first two post-treatment visits (3 and 4). This reduction in essential fatty acid output follows the reduction in milk volume. In Khon-Kaen, the combined pill group showed a significant decrease compared with the controls, in the proportions of dihommo-gamma-linolenic acid. The difference in response of the mothers in Khon-Kaen and Szeged is discussed in relation to their different nutritional backgrounds.

Contraceptive Agents↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial.

This open-label, randomized, Phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of and compliance with NuvaRing, a combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 microg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 microg of etonogestrel daily, with those of and with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 microg of levonorgestrel (LNG) and 30 microg of EE. Subjects received NuvaRing or a COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-/pill-free period). A total of 1030 subjects (NuvaRing, n=512; COC, n=518) was randomized and started treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for the NuvaRing group and 71.2% for the COC group. Five in-treatment pregnancies occurred in each group, giving Pearl indices of 1.23 for NuvaRing and 1.19 for the COC. Compliance with both treatments was excellent and both were well tolerated. In conclusion, NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability with a COC containing 150 microg of LNG and 30 microg of EE and does not require daily dosing.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

[Definitive contraception and contraceptive responsibility (on the psychic situation in voluntary sterilization in men and women--results of psychologic-psychiatric research) (author's transl)].

Definitive contraception or voluntary sterilization in men and women has become more and more common as a final and permanent contraceptive measure. This family planning method combines all advantages of contraceptives under the psychological prerequisites: independent and free decision, clear motivation regarding the renouncement of reproduction, agreement between the partners, balanced partnership and personality, detailed advice before the operation. These prognostic criteria are derived from the author's evaluation of 73 psychologico-psychiatric series of catamneses of the past five decades in international literature.

Female↗
PubMed1997

The use of oral contraceptives and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in young women. Results from the Transnational Study on Oral Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women.

The objective of this study was to assess the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the use of new and old combination oral contraceptives (OC). A matched case-control study in 16 centers in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Austria, and Switzerland explored the association of current use of combination OC with the occurrence of MI. Our subjects were 182 women aged 16-44 years with MI; the controls were 635 women without MI (at least one hospital control and one community control per case) matched for 5-year age group and region. The main outcome measures were odds ratios comparing current use of a specific group of OC against current use of other groups or against no current use. The adjusted overall odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence intervals) for MI for second generation OC versus no current use was 2.35 (1.42 to 3.89) and 0.82 (0.29 to 2.31) for third generation OC (low dose ethinyl estradiol, gestodene, and desogestrel). A direct comparison of third generation users with second generation users yielded an OR of 0.28 (0.09 to 0.86). In subgroup analyses, the odds ratio for the UK alone was 1.25 (0.36 to 4.29), while for continental Europe it was 0.10 (0.02 to 0.48). For hospital controls, the risk estimated was 0.98 (0.22 to 4.44), and 0.18 (0.04 to 0.65) for community controls. The independent risk of MI among current smokers adjusted for OC use was 7.21 (4.58 to 11.36). Among users of third generation OC, the OR for current smokers was 3.75 (0.65 to 21.74) and among users of second generation it was 9.50 (2.93 to 30.96). A comparison of OC use in the UK for the time before and after regulatory action was taken in October 1995 shows that the likelihood of a control (last control accrued June 1996) being treated with second generation OC is seven times higher after 1 November 1995 than it was before. Third generation OC are the first to be associated with no excess risk of MI. A significantly lower risk of MI is found when comparing use of third generation OC with use of second generation OC. There seems to be an impressive amelioration of risk among smokers using newer OC. An impact of regulatory action in the UK was found in the OC use spectrum of controls.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

BACKGROUND: Side effects of oral contraceptive pills (OCs) discourage adherence to and continuation of OC regimens. Strategies to decrease adverse effects led to the introduction of the triphasic OC in the 1980s. Whether triphasic OCs have higher accidental pregnancy rates than monophasic pills is unknown. Nor is it known if triphasic pills give better cycle control and fewer side effects than the monophasic pills. OBJECTIVES: To compare triphasic OCs with monophasic OCs in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation due to side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the computerized databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS and CENTRAL. Additionally, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted researchers and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the U.S. to identify other trials not found in our search. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any triphasic OC with any monophasic pill used to prevent pregnancy. Interventions had to include at least three treatment cycles. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed the studies found in the literature searches for possible inclusion and for their methodological quality. We contacted the authors of all included studies and of possibly randomized trials for supplemental information about the methods and outcomes studied. We entered the data into RevMan 4.2 and calculated odds ratios for the outcome measures of efficacy, breakthrough bleeding, spotting, withdrawal bleeding and discontinuation. MAIN RESULTS: Of 21 trials included, 18 examined contraceptive effectiveness: the triphasic and monophasic preparations did not differ significantly. Several trials reported favorable bleeding patterns, i.e. less spotting, breakthrough bleeding or amenorrhea, in triphasic versus monophasic OC users. However, meta-analysis was generally not possible due to differences in measuring and reporting the cycle disturbance data as well as differences in progestogen type and hormone dosages. No significant differences were found in the numbers of women who discontinued due to medical reasons, cycle disturbances, intermenstrual bleeding or adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence is insufficient to determine whether triphasic OCs differ from monophasic OCs in effectiveness, bleeding patterns or discontinuation rates. Therefore, we recommend monophasic pills as a first choice for women starting OC use. Large, high-quality RCTs that compare triphasic and monophasic OCs with identical progestogens are needed to determine whether triphasic pills differ from monophasic OCs. Future studies should follow the WHO recommendations on recording menstrual bleeding patterns and the CONSORT reporting guidelines.

Contraception↗
PubMed2004

Progestogens in combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

BACKGROUND: The progestogen component of oral contraceptives (OC) has undergone changes since it was first recognised that their chemical structures could influence the spectrum of minor adverse and beneficial effects. The major determinants of OCs are effectiveness, cycle control and common side effects. The rationale of this review is to provide a systematic comparison of OCs containing the progestogens currently in use worldwide. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to compare currently available low-dose OCs containing ethinyl estradiol and different progestogens in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, cycle control, side effects and continuation rates. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases have been searched systematically. Relevant pharmaceutical companies and the authors of articles included in this review have been contacted for clarification. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials reporting clinical outcomes were considered for inclusion. We excluded studies comparing mono- with multiphasic pills, and crossover trials with trials in which the difference in total content of ethinyl estradiol between preparations exceeded 105 micro g. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality and validity of studies were assessed based on the above-mentioned inclusion criteria. Both application of inclusion criteria and data extraction were performed independently by the reviewers. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two trials have been included in this review, thus generating 14 comparisons. Eighteen trials were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies and in only 5 cases had a blind trial been attempted. Most comparisons between different interventions included 1-3 trials. There was less discontinuation with second- compared to first-generation progestogens (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.91). Cycle control appears to be better when using second- compared to first-generation progestogens for both mono- (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.91) and triphasic (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.85) preparations.Contraceptive effectiveness, spotting, breakthrough bleeding and the absence of withdrawal bleeding was similar when using GSD compared to LNG, although there was less intermenstrual bleeding in the GSD group (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.91). Drospirenone (DRSP) appeared to be similar to DSG. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on data from one trial, compared to pills containing LNG, those containing GSD may be associated with less intermenstrual bleeding although they show similar patterns of spotting, breakthrough bleeding and the absence of withdrawal bleeds. GSD is also comparable to DSG. Regarding acceptability, all the indices show that third- and second-generation progestogens are preferred over first-generation preparations. Future research should focus on independently conducted, well-designed randomised trials that compare third- and second-generation progestogens in particular.

Contraception↗
PubMed2004

Emergency contraception: why can't you give it away? Qualitative findings from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception.

The Lothian Emergency Contraception Project (LECP)--a primary care-based intervention to offer advance supplies of emergency contraception (EC) to women aged 16-29 was not associated with a reduction in abortion rates. We undertook case studies, utilizing qualitative and quantitative methods, to evaluate the intervention. In this article we present findings from qualitative interviews with 44 primary care professionals working at case study sites and 22 women who had received advance supplies to explain this failure. Professionals reported that women rarely asked for advance supplies of EC and they were reluctant to offer supplies to women because of concerns about contradictory sexual health messages implied by the offer, a perceived association of EC use with chaotic behavior by women, views about the sort of women suitable for advance supplies and practical difficulties making the offer. Women were reluctant to ask for advance supplies because of misgivings about the appropriateness of offering advance supplies to everybody and concerns about being judged by health professionals as morally inadequate. If advance provision of EC is to be successful in reducing abortion rates, professionals must address their concerns about EC and develop imaginative ways of encouraging women most at risk of unwanted pregnancy to take supplies home.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Bone mineral density in women aged 40-49 years using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enanthate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Most studies show that depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has a negative effect on bone mass. There are conflicting reports with respect to recovery of bone mass with long-term use of DMPA. No information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in older women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study. One-hundred twenty-seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Bone mineral density was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry. There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p=.26) with and without adjustment for age. Although a small decrease in BMD was noted in the age range of 40-49 years, this was not statistically significant (p=.7). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p or=25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH <25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p=.006). This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects BMD in this population.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism with oral contraceptives containing norgestimate or desogestrel compared with oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel.

CONTEXT: Previous studies have reported that users of the "third-generation" oral contraceptives (OCs) containing the progestins gestodene and desogestrel have about twice the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to users of older OCs containing levonorgestrel. Estimates of the risk for VTE among users of norgestimate-containing OCs compared to other OCs, however, are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to obtain quantitative information on the risk of nonfatal VTE in women using OCs containing either norgestimate or desogestrel in comparison with women taking OCs containing levonorgestrel. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Based on information from PharMetrics, a United States-based company that collects and records information on claims paid by managed care plans, we used a nested case-control study design to estimate relative risks of nonfatal VTE among 15- to 39-year-old current users of OCs containing norgestimate with 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol (EE), desogestrel with 30 microg of EE or levonorgestrel with 30 microg of EE, both monophasic and triphasic preparations, during the period January 2000 to March 2005. Cases were women with a well-documented VTE of uncertain origin that was diagnosed in current users of a study drug. Up to four controls were closely matched to each case by age and calendar time, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression comparing the risk of VTE among users of the three contraceptives. We also estimated and compared the incidence rates for all three OCs. RESULTS: Based on 281 newly diagnosed idiopathic cases of VTE and 1055 controls, we found that the adjusted ORs for nonfatal VTE comparing norgestimate- or desogestrel-containing OC users to users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs were 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8-1.6] and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.4), respectively. The incidence rates of VTE were 30.6 (95% CI, 25.5-36.5), 53.5 (95% CI, 42.9-66.0) and 27.1 (95% CI, 21.1-34.3) per 100,000 woman-years for users of norgestimate-, desogestrel- and levonorgestrel-containing OCs, respectively. The incidence rate ratios for norgestimate-containing OCs compared to levonorgestrel-containing OCs and desogestrel-containing OCs compared to levonorgestrel-containing OCs were 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.5) and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of nonfatal VTE among users of desogestrel-containing OCs is significantly elevated compared to that of levonorgestrel-containing OCs. The risk of VTE in users of norgestimate-containing OCs was closely similar to that of users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Comparative study of the effects of two once-a-month injectable contraceptives (Cyclofem and Mesigyna) and one oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum 1/35) on coagulation and fibrinolysis.

A randomized controlled multicenter study was undertaken to monitor the effects on hemostasis of two once-a-month injectable contraceptive preparations, Mesigyna (50 mg norethisterone enanthate and 5 mg estradiol valerate) and Cyclofem (25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg estradiol cypionate) in comparison with a well-known oral contraceptive (OC) Ortho-Novum 1/35 (norethisterone 1 mg and ethinyl estradiol 35 microg). A total of 378 volunteers from four centers (Bangkok, Hangzhou, Santiago and Singapore) were monitored. Blood sampling took place in one pretreatment cycle, the third and ninth injection intervals and one posttreatment cycle. In each of the three treatment groups, a rise in hemoglobin, and increases in platelet count and in prothrombin time were observed. With treatment there was a significant increase in activated partial thromboplastin time among Mesigyna users, no change among Cyclofem users and a significant decrease among OC users. OC use led to increases in plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, factor X, plasminogen, protein C and decreases in plasma levels of t-PAI and antithrombin. Use of combined injectables induced no change (Cyclofem) or decreases (Mesigyna) in plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, factor X and antithrombin. Use of both combined injectables led to decreases in protein C, slight decreases in plasminogen and increases in plasminogen and fibrinogen. Overall, the injectable preparations may be more beneficial than the oral preparation in not enhancing a hypercoagulable state because of the reduced synthesis of fibrinogen, factors VII and X; however, decreases in antithrombin and protein C, which are potent coagulation inhibitors, may raise some concern. Whether these changes can lead to modifications in the risk of arterial or venous disease can only be ascertained by conducting epidemiological studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer--further findings from the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study.

In 1983, we reported results from the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study regarding the association between oral contraceptives (OCs) and cervical neoplasia, after a 10 year follow-up of a cohort of 17,000 women. Further findings from this study are reported here after an additional 12 years of follow-up. A nested case--control design was used in which cases were all women diagnosed under 45 years of age with invasive carcinoma (n = 33), carcinoma in situ (n = 121) or dysplasia (n = 159). Controls were randomly selected from among cohort members and matched to cases on exact year of birth and clinic attended at recruitment to study. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with various aspects of OC use relative to never users adjusted for social class, smoking, age at first birth and ever use of diaphragm or condom. Ever users of OCs had a slightly elevated OR for all types of cervical neoplasia combined (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.00-1.96). Odds ratios were highest for invasive carcinoma (OR = 4.44, 95% CI 1.04-31.6), intermediate for carcinoma in situ (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.00-3.00) and lowest for dysplasia (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.66). The elevated risk associated with OC use appeared to be largely confined to current or recent (last use in the past 2 years) long-term users of OCs. Among current or recent users, ORs for all types of cervical neoplasia combined were 3.34 (95% CI 1.96-5.67) for 49-72 months of use, 1.69 (95% CI 0.97-2.95) for 73-96 months and 2.04 (95% CI 1.34-3.11) for 97 or more months. These results suggest a possible effect of OC use on later stages of cervical carcinogenesis, although residual confounding due to sexual factors or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection cannot be ruled out.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Impact of early postpartum administration of progestin-only hormonal contraceptives compared with nonhormonal contraceptives on short-term breast-feeding patterns.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the impact on breast-feeding patterns of early postpartum initiation of progestin-only birth control methods compared with nonhormonal methods. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized trial was performed comparing progestin-only contraceptive methods administered before hospital discharge with nonhormonal methods on breast-feeding continuation rates, exclusive breast-feeding, and supplementation at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after delivery. RESULTS: Three hundred nineteen women provided complete data until hospital discharge. The hormonal group had higher risk factors for not breast-feeding, but there was no difference among any of the subgroups in breast-feeding continuation rates except at week 4. Supplementation or perception of insufficient milk production did not differ between groups. By week 6, 23.5% of women discontinued breast-feeding, and 64.5% of those breast-feeding were supplementing. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there is no detectable adverse impact on breast-feeding attributable to progestin-only contraceptive methods initiated within the first 3 days post partum.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMed2004

Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This trial was conducted to compare cycle control with vaginal ring a combined contraceptive vaginal ring, and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) delivering 30 mug ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 mug levonorgestrel. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, multi-centre, Phase III study involved adult women from 11 countries. Subjects were treated with either vaginal ring or a COC for 13 cycles (12 months). RESULTS: A total of 1030 subjects (vaginal ring, n=512; COC, n=518) comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for vaginal ring and 71.2% for the COC group. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding and spotting over cycles 2-13, the primary efficacy parameter, was lower with vaginal ring (range 2.0-6.4%) than the COC (range 3.5-12.6%), and for cycles 2 and 9 the lower incidence with vaginal ring was confirmed as statistically significant (P=0.003 and P=0.002 respectively). The incidence of intended bleeding was significantly higher over all cycles with vaginal ring (58.8-72.8%) than with the COC (43.4-57.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Cycle control with vaginal ring was excellent and superior to that of a COC containing 30 mug EE.

Adult↗