Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RESORCINOL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

Resorcinol congeners of dopamine derived from benzocycloheptene and indan.

Series of N-alkylated derivatives of 2-amino-4,6-dihydroxyindan 3 and 6-amino-1,3-dihydroxybenzocycloheptene 2 were prepared for pharmacological testing as congeners of 2-amino-5,7-dihydroxytetralin, which elicits dopaminergic effects in a variety of assays. All of the subject compounds demonstrated a lower order of dopamine-like activity than the tetralin derivatives. Some of the subject compounds showed weak interactions with alpha 1- and beta 1-adrenoceptors, but the major determinant of activity seemed to be the nature of the N-alkyl substituent rather than ring size.

Animals↗

Solid-state supramolecular structures of resorcinol-arylboronic acid compounds.

[structure: see text] An X-ray crystallographic study of unique hydrogen-bonded supramolecular solid-state networks comprised of a tetraarylboronic acid resorcinarene is described. When 1 is recrystallized from 9:1 MeOH:EtOH, partial esterification takes place to give compound 2, the corresponding half methyl ester, which forms an infinite two-dimensional array. Each molecule participates in 12 hydrogen bonds with other macrocycles. These hydrogen bonds are both B-OH- - - OH (phenolic) and OH (phenolic)- - -OH (phenolic).

Boronic Acids↗

In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of synthetic olivetol- or resorcinol-derived cannabinoid receptor ligands.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We have previously reported the development of CB-25 and CB-52, two ligands of CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. We assessed here their functional activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effect of the two compounds on forskolin-induced cAMP formation in intact cells or GTP-gamma-S binding to cell membranes, and their action on nociception in vivo was determined. KEY RESULTS: CB-25 enhanced forskolin-induced cAMP formation in N18TG2 cells (EC50 approximately 20 nM, max. stimulation = 48%), behaving as an inverse CB1 agonist, but it stimulated GTP-gamma-S binding to mouse brain membranes, behaving as a partial CB1 agonist (EC50 =100 nM, max. stimulation = 48%). At human CB1 receptors, CB-25 inhibited cAMP formation in hCB1-CHO cells (EC50 = 1600 nM, max. inhibition = 68% of CP-55,940 effect). CB-52 inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP formation by N18TG2 cells (IC50 = 450 nM, max. inhibition = 40%) and hCB1-CHO cells (EC50 = 2600 nM, max. inhibition = 62% of CP-55,940 effect), and stimulated GTP-gamma-S binding to mouse brain membranes (EC50 = 11 nM, max. stimulation approximately 16%). Both CB-25 and CB-52 showed no activity in all assays of CB2-coupled functional activity and antagonized CP55940-induced stimulation of GTP-gamma-S binding to hCB2-CHO cell membranes. In vivo, both compounds, administered i.p., produced dose-dependent nociception in the plantar test carried out in healthy rats, and antagonised the anti-nociceptive effect of i.p. WIN55,212-2. In the formalin test in mice, however, the compounds counteracted both phases of formalin-induced nociception. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CB-25 and CB-52 behave in vitro mostly as CB1 partial agonists and CB2 neutral antagonists, whereas their activity in vivo might depend on the tonic activity of cannabinoid receptors.

Action Potentials↗