Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach.

PURPOSE: A variety of surgical procedures have been developed to treat rectal prolapse, but there is still no consensus on the operation of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse during an 11-year period in our department. METHODS: All patients treated for complete rectal prolapse during an 11-year period, from 1985 to 1995, in a single university hospital were included. Of the 123 patients, 22 were men, and the mean age was 59 (range, 15-88) years. The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively, and a questionnaire on bowel symptoms before and after surgery was sent to all 95 living patients. RESULTS: The majority of the procedures (91 percent) were performed by abdominal approach, and the most frequently used open technique was posterior rectopexy with mesh (78 percent). Of the incontinent patients, 35 (63 percent), all those less than 40 years of age and 64 percent of those 40 years or older, were continent postoperatively (P = 0.0001) after a median follow-up of five (range, 1-72) months. According to the questionnaire, after a median follow-up of 85 (range, 16-144) months, only 38 percent of the incontinent patients in the mesh or suture group, 78 percent of patients less than 40 years of age (n = 18), and 52 percent of those 40 years or older (n = 47) claimed to be continent postoperatively. The proportion of patients with constipation was greater after the operation than preoperatively (P = 0.02) and more patients used medication for constipation after than before the operation (P = 0.0001). The overall complication rate was 15 percent, and the mortality rate was 1 percent (1/123). In the mesh or suture group there were 6 (6 percent) recurrent complete prolapses and 11 (12 percent) mucous prolapses. CONCLUSION: Posterior rectopexy with mesh gave good results in our hands. Older age and longer follow-up seem to have a negative effect on the functional outcome of the operation and on the recurrence rate.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Colopexy as a treatment for rectal prolapse in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 14 cases.

Colopexy was evaluated as a treatment for recurrent rectal prolapse in eight dogs and six cats. Cases included in the study were from two institutions; the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine and the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine. Two different colopexy techniques were used: A simple suture technique was used in two cats and four dogs (University of Pennsylvania), and an incisional technique was used in four cats and four dogs (University of Tennessee). Rectal prolapse had not recurred in any of the 14 animals at the time of follow-up. Incisional dehiscence occurred in two animals and in one instance may have been related to the colopexy procedure. Infection at the colopexy site, secondary to suture penetration of the colonic lumen, is a potential complication of this procedure. Colopexy, using either surgical technique described here, was effective in preventing recurrent rectal prolapse.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Treatment with a combined cystopexy-colopexy for dysuria and rectal prolapse after bilateral perineal herniorrhaphy in a dog.

A 9-year-old castrated male Yorkshire Terrier was evaluated for dysuria and rectal prolapse 2 weeks after bilateral perineal herniorrhaphy. Dysuria was secondary to caudal displacement of the bladder, rather than retroflexion of the bladder. Dysuria and rectal prolapse were associated with disruption of supporting ligaments of the urinary bladder and colon, which may have been caused by tenesmus. Combined cystopexy and colopexy were used successfully to treat the dysuria and rectal prolapse.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence following surgery for rectal prolapse repair: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: A proportion of patients have fecal incontinence secondary to a full-thickness rectal prolapse that fails to resolve following prolapse repair. This multicenter, prospective study assessed the use of sacral nerve stimulation for this indication. METHODS: Patients had to have more than or equal to four days with fecal incontinence per 21-day period more than one year after surgery. They had to have failed conservative treatment and have an intact external anal sphincter. RESULTS: Four female patients aged 42, 54, 68, and 65 years met the inclusion criteria. Three of the four patients had had more than one operation for recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse before sacral nerve stimulation, one of whom had undergone a further operation for recurrence following stimulation. One patient had undergone one operation for prolapse repair. The preoperative duration of symptoms was ten, eight, three, and nine years, respectively. Although patients had an intact external anal sphincter, one patient had a fragmented internal anal sphincter. The frequency of fecal incontinent episodes changed from 11, 24.7, 5, and 8 per week at baseline to 0, 1.5, 5.5, and 1 per week at latest follow-up. Ability to defer defecation was also improved in two of three patients who had this documented. Fecal incontinence-specific quality of life assessment showed an improvement in all four domains. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation should be considered for patients with ongoing fecal incontinence following full-thickness rectal prolapse repair if they prove resistant to conservative treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Triple suspension rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

Twenty-eight patients with complete rectal prolapse were treated by a three-level triple suspension abdominal rectopexy with no recurrence and with improvement of rectal function. Rectal suspension was effected by three steel wire slings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Clinical results of abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Abdominal Marlex-mesh rectopexy was used for surgical treatment of rectal prolapse in 54 consecutive patients. Anal incontinence was observed in 43 patients (80%) before surgical treatment. The degree of anal incontinence was more severe in women as compared with men. Operative treatment corrected the pathologic anatomy effectively as only one recurrent prolapse developed. At the follow-up examination three patients had symptomless anal mucosal prolapse during maximal straining. 75% of the incontinent patients regained continence for faeces and the rest had some improvement in continence. Seventeen patients (31%) had postoperative constipation, that required lactulose treatment. In conclusion, abdominal Marlex-mesh rectopexy can be recommended as safe and effective treatment for rectal prolapse, despite some patients developing constipation and some remaining incontinent.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Postanal repair and intersphincteric Ivalon sponge rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age: 74 years) with complete rectal prolapse, fifteen of whom were incontinent of solid stool, have been treated by postanal repair and intersphincteric Ivalon sponge rectopexy. There was no operative mortality, or serious morbidity. There was one recurrence of complete prolapse which occurred 14 days after operation. The other 23 patients have been followed for up to 4 years. All patients who were incontinent of solid stool pre-operatively have been rendered continent. This type of operation may be the treatment of choice in the elderly, where an abdominal procedure is considered unwise and in cases of rectal prolapse associated with faecal incontinence.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Rectal prolapse. Surgical techniques.

The varied operative procedures available for the treatment of rectal prolapse can be confusing. Most of the maneuvers are relatively esoteric and can be performed successfully only by the few surgeons who have developed the specialized techniques. It is recommended, therefore, that the surgeon who is less experienced with rectal prolapse adopt one of the standard operations. A rectopexy or suspension procedure without resection can be performed safely with good results, low morbidity, and a low mortality rate. Anterior resection with or without sacral fixation, an operation familiar to most surgeons, also offers an excellent cure rate. The Thiersch-type approach should probably be reserved for those patients who cannot tolerate laparotomy. The material chosen should be one of the commercially available synthetic products; wire should not be used. The Silastic-impregnated Dacron prosthesis for this operation has some potential benefit, especially for the incontinent patient. Results of further studies are awaited.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2001

Extracorporal resection of the rectum in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse using a circular stapling device.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND AND PATIENTS: The technique of the extracorporal resection of the rectum using a circular stapler in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse is described on the basis of 31 successfully applied operations at the Surgical Unit in Düsseldorf-Gerresheim. RESULTS: The easy-to-perform operation does not require general anaesthesia, the incidence of peri-operative complications (5/31) and lethality (1/31) is acceptable and post-operative recovery is fast due to less physiologic insult as compared to transabdominal procedures. The recurrence rates (0/22) stand the comparison with transabdominal procedures. The operation can be re-performed in the case of a recurrent prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our good results show that the perineal rectosigmoidostomy using a circular stapler is a safe and efficient means of controlling rectal prolapse. Many advantages in comparison with transabdominal procedures make it an attractive option for many patients suffering from rectal prolapse.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1998

Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.

AIMS: A study is made of the alterations in anorectal physiology among rectal prolapse patients, evaluating the differences between fecal continent and incontinent individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with complete rectal prolapse were divided into two groups: Group A (8 continent individuals) and Group B (10 incontinent women), while 22 healthy women were used as controls (Group C). Clinical exploration and perineal level measurements were performed, along with anorectal manometry, electrophysiology, and anorectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. RESULTS: The main antecedents of the continent subjects were excess straining efforts, while the incontinent women presented excess straining and complex deliveries. Pathological perineal descent was a frequent finding in both groups, with a hypotonic anal canal at rest (p < 0.001 vs controls) and at voluntary squeezing (p < 0.001 vs controls). In turn, the incontinent patients exhibited a significantly lower anal canal pressure at rest than the continent women (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups A and C in terms of pudendal motor latency, though latency was significantly longer in Group B than in the controls (p < 0.01). Moreover, pudendal neuropathy was more common, severe and often bilateral in Group B. There were no differences in rectal sensation to distention or in terms of the volumes required to relax the internal anal sphincter. In turn, both prolapse groups exhibited diminished anal canal and rectal sensitivity to electrical stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal prolapse exhibit a hypotonic anal canal at rest, regardless of whether they are continent to feces or not. Continent patients have less pudendal neuropathy and therefore less pressure alterations at voluntary sphincter squeeze than incontinent individuals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse. METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken. The case group consisted of a consecutive series of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse between February 1993 and June 2000. The control group underwent open prolapse repair between October 1987 and January 2000. RESULTS: There were 53 patients in each group. The groups were matched according to operation type, gender, and age. Median operative time was longer in the case group than in the control group (resection rectopexy 210 vs. 117 minutes, rectopexy 127.5 vs. 72 minutes, respectively). Median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the case group than in the control group (resection rectopexy 5 vs. 7 days, rectopexy 4.5 vs. 7 days, respectively). Median intraoperative bleeding was minor in the case group (resection rectopexy 35 vs. 300 ml, rectopexy 15 vs. 100 ml, respectively). Mortality (0 vs. 4 percent), complications (23 vs. 30 percent), late complications (4 vs. 13 percent), and the rate of recurrent prolapse (6 vs. 13 percent) did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse is technically feasible and can be performed with mortality and morbidity rates comparable to those of the conventional technique. The main advantages of the laparoscopic approach appear to be a shorter hospital stay and lessened intraoperative blood loss. Recurrence rate is not increased in the short term.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Herniation of the small intestine through an incised rectal prolapse. Case report.

Spontaneous rupture of protruding rectal wall with evisceration is a rare complication of rectal prolapse. We hereby present the case of a woman with a large prolapse of the rectum into which small intestine descended and strangulated. The evisceration became clear after incision of the prolapse taken for a large anal haematoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh for rectal prolapse and incontinence.

Seventeen selected patients (mean age, 74 years)--14 with rectal prolapse and 3 with persisting anal incontinence after previous operations--underwent high anal encirclement with polypropylene mesh. There was no operative mortality. Prolapse recurred in 2 (15 percent) of the 13 patients followed up for 6 months or more (mean, 3.5 years). Three (27 percent) of the 11 patients with associated anal incontinence improved functionally, as did the three operated on for persisting incontinence, but only one patient regained normal continence. No breakage, cutting out, or infection related to the mesh was observed. Because of the risk of fecal impaction encountered in three of our patients, the procedure is not advocated for severely constipated patients. Despite the somewhat disappointing results regarding restoration of continence, we find this method useful in patients with rectal prolapse who are unfit for more extensive surgery, in controlling the prolapse to an acceptable degree.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Transanal mucosal sleeve resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse in children.

This is a report of a simple transanal operation performed on six patients (age range, 19 months to 18 years), who underwent unsuccessful nonoperative management of complete rectal prolapse for at least 1 month (range, 1 month to 13 years). All patients had normal sweat chloride levels, normal chest radiographs, and normal barium enemas. None of the patients were neurologically compromised. At the time of surgery, all but one patient had occurrence of reducible prolapse with minor straining or with every bowel movement. No severe mucosal ulcerations were present. Surgical therapy consisted of the transanal mucosal sleeve resection described herein. In this series, there were no anastomotic leaks, no clinically evident strictures and no recurrence of prolapse in 1.5- to 19-year follow-up. Surgical therapy for rectal prolapse in infants and children is rarely necessary. Various complicated or ineffective operations for the treatment of this condition have been recommended in the past. This technique offers a simple, safe, and effective method of treating complete, medically intractable rectal prolapse in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse.

We reviewed the long-term functional results of colon resection and suture rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in 47 patients followed for more than 3 yr (mean 65 months). Thirty-three patients underwent sigmoidectomy, eight patients underwent subtotal colectomy, and four patients underwent sigmoidectomy with subsequent subtotal colectomy. Three patients (6.3%) developed recurrent full-thickness prolapse, and four patients (8.5%) developed rectal mucosal prolapse. Twenty patients presented with constipation, 10 (50%) of whom improved after surgery. Constipation improved in seven (70%) patients who underwent subtotal colectomy. Twenty-one patients presented with incontinence, eight (38%) of whom improved. Continence worsened in six patients, and four patients developed significant diarrhea. These complications did not correlate with the extent of bowel resection. Three patients required subsequent stomas. Colon resection and rectopexy provides long-term control of rectal prolapse with an acceptable recurrence rate. Subtotal colon resection is frequently helpful in patients with associated constipation. However, colon resection of any magnitude entails a small risk of chronic diarrhea and/or diminished continence.

Colectomy↗
PubMed2000

[Radiologic investigation of external rectal prolapse. Assessment in 48 patients with defecography, seven of them also with dynamic CT of the pelvis].

PURPOSE: To report our personal experience in 48 patients with external rectal prolapse examined with defecography, evaluating radiological signs and the indications for surgical treatment. We also report the results of 7 patients with severe prolapse submitted to dynamic CT of pelvis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The findings relative to 48 patients suffering from external prolapse, 27 women and 21 men, (mean age 58 years), were retrospectively reviewed. In our study protocol the patient is made to sit on a defecographic commode with the pelvis in lateral projection and radiographic images are acquired at rest, on contraction and on evacuation. Dynamic CT of pelvis with axial and coronal scans of the pelvic floor was carried out in 7 patients with severe prolapses. Twenty-six of 48 patients underwent rectopexy. RESULTS: The main symptoms were anorectal and perineal weight sensation (93%), perineal disturbance in the sitting position (91%) and anorectal pain extended to sacral area (83%). Manometry, which was performed in 36 cases, showed a rectoanal inhibitory reflex evokable at high volumes of air, especially in incontinent subjects. Defecography demonstrated external rectal prolapse in all cases; rectal intussusception in 32, mucosal prolapse in 30, abnormal widening of the anorectal angle in 24 (16 of them were incontinent), rectocele in 22 and perineal descent syndrome in 16 cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: External rectal prolapse is sometimes a dynamic progression of a rectal intussusception. In anorectal intussusceptions, the invaginatum involves the anal canal, thus causing the external prolapse. Defecography clearly shows the continuation of invagination out of the anus, with the formation of prolapse. Dynamic CT proved accurate in detecting the rectum morphology, but added no further information to defecography, except for the diastasis of anosphincterial muscles. Therefore, we conclude that defecography is the method of choice, though complementary to other instrumental techniques such as manometry, electromyography and endoscopy, in the diagnostic workup of these patients. Moreover, it can recognize other alterations, such as incontinence and rectocele, which can be submitted to surgical correction with rectopexy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Colonic motility is abnormal before surgery for rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal rectopexy remains the operation of choice for patients with rectal prolapse. Recurrence rates are low but the functional results are poor. Hindgut motility was measured before abdominal rectopexy to determine whether an underlying neuropathy might explain these poor results. METHODS: Seven women of mean(s.d.) age 56(10) years had a multilumen catheter inserted in the colon before abdominal rectopexy. Colonic intraluminal pressure was recorded for a mean(s.d.) of 19(3) h; the number of peaks over 5 and 50 mmHg, motility and high-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) were measured before and after a meal and compared with the findings in five controls. RESULTS: Patients had high numbers of contractions greater than 5 mmHg and high motility before meals. Controls responded to meals by increasing motility, unlike patients. HAPCs were seen in one patient but in all controls. CONCLUSION: These data show that patients with rectal prolapse have a hindgut motility abnormality before abdominal rectopexy, similar to that observed in spinal cord injury. This may explain the poor functional results after surgery, offering a rationale for colonic resection.

Adult↗