SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RADIOGRAPHY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Trends in the use of CT and radiography in the evaluation of facial trauma, 1992-2002: implications for current costs.

OBJECTIVE: CT has replaced conventional radiography of the face in many trauma centers. Concern exists that increased costs are associated with increased use of CT. Our goal was to compare the amount of CT and radiography performed for facial trauma at a level 1 trauma center in 1992 and in 2002 and to determine hospital costs for the imaging of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The changes in volume and types of facial imaging examinations were determined comparing 1992 and 2002. Hospital costs of different imaging examinations were determined for 2002. Current costs of imaging facial trauma were compared with what 2002 costs would have been if the practice pattern in 1992 had continued. RESULTS: In 1992, 890 patients were evaluated for facial trauma. Six hundred seventy-one had only radiography, 153 only CT of the face, and 66 both CT and radiography. In 2002, 828 patients were evaluated. Five hundred eighty-four patients had only CT of the face; 228, only radiography; and 16, both CT and radiography. The number of facial imaging examinations per patient in 1992 and 2002 was 1.23 and 1.03, respectively. The 2002 hospital cost of a facial CT examination was $121 and of a facial radiography series was $154. Using CT instead of radiography for evaluating facial injury resulted in an overall cost savings of 22% per patient in 2002. CONCLUSION: The availability of CT has not resulted in increased use of facial imaging. The increased use of CT from 1992 to 2002 results in decreased current costs for the hospital.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Reduction in retake rates and radiation dosage through computed radiography.

The availability of computed radiography has opened the possibility of using reduced dosage for radiographs in clinical settings and reducing the retake rate. A prospective controlled study was carried out over a period of four months comparing conventional X-rays and computed radiography. The aim was to assess if computed radiography at 50% normal dosage would result in films of adequate quality and a reduced retake rate compared to conventional radiography. The number and reason for retakes in each group were recorded. Film quality comparison using only chest X-rays (CXR) in one of three positions; erect posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) sitting and supine was done by a panel of radiologists. A total of 6373 conventional and 4127 digital films were analysed. The overall retake rate was lower in the computed radiography group (4.6 vs 8.2% P < 0.001) as was the retake rate due to exposure factors (0.6% vs 3.2% P < 0.01). There was a higher proportion of optimal films in the computed radiography group for erect PA and sitting AP CXR (71% vs 61% P = 0.0015 and 64% vs 9% P = 0.0009 respectively) but no difference for supine films. Computed radiography resulted in a reduced retake rate due to exposure factors leading to a reduction in the overall retake rate. Despite 50% dosage reduction, films were of better or equal quality when compared to conventional radiography.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.

CONTEXT: The Ottawa Knee Rule is a previously validated clinical decision rule that was developed to allow physicians to be more selective and efficient in their use of plain radiography for patients with acute knee injuries. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on clinical practice of implementing the Ottawa Knee Rule. DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial with before-after and concurrent controls. SETTING: Emergency departments of 2 teaching and 2 community hospitals. PATIENTS: All 3907 consecutive eligible adults seen with acute knee injuries during two 12-month periods before and after the intervention. INTERVENTION: During the after period in the 2 intervention hospitals, the Ottawa Knee Rule was taught to all house staff and attending physicians who were encouraged to order knee radiography according to the rule. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral for knee radiography, accuracy and reliability of the rule, mean time in emergency department, and mean charges. RESULTS: There was a relative reduction of 26.4% in the proportion of patients referred for knee radiography in the intervention group (77.6% vs 57.1 %; P<.001), but a relative reduction of only 1.3% in the control group (76.9% vs 75.9%; P=.60). These changes over time were significant when the intervention and control groups were compared (P<.001). The rule was found to have a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.0) for detecting 58 knee fractures. The K coefficient for interpretation of the rule was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.0). Compared with nonfracture patients who underwent radiography during the after-intervention period, those discharged without radiography spent less time in the emergency department (85.7 minutes vs 118.8 minutes) and incurred lower estimated total medical charges for physician visits and radiography (US $80 vs US $183). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule led to a decrease in use of knee radiography without patient dissatisfaction or missed fractures and was associated with reduced waiting times and costs. Widespread use of the rule could lead to important health care savings without jeopardizing patient care.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1996

Imaging of bone tumors: evaluation of direct magnification radiography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potentials of magnification radiography as compared with conventional radiography in diagnosing bone tumors. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients with primary bone tumors and tumorlike lesions underwent radiography with both conventional (non-magnified) and magnification (five-fold) techniques. All radiographs were analyzed by four radiologists and the findings correlated with the histopathology findings. The microfocal X-ray unit used for magnification radiography had a focal spot size of 20-130 microns. Digital luminescence radiography was employed with magnification, while normal film-screen systems were used with conventional radiography. RESULTS: The diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions as well as the individual tumor diagnosis were determined with higher accuracy using magnification compared with conventional radiography (88% vs 75% and 71% vs 52%, p < 0.01). Margins of destruction, periosteal reactions and matrix patterns were evaluated with higher certainty by all of the radiologists (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Magnification radiography may improve the evaluation and diagnosis of bone tumors.

Bone Neoplasms↗

PubMed2004

Endoscopy versus radiography for the diagnosis of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

The aim of the study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopy and the diagnostic value of clinical criteria for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS). The hospital records of 117 consecutive patients who had symptoms compatible with ABRS and who underwent sinus radiography and flexible nasendoscopy were retrieved. A positive diagnosis was entertained when radiography demonstrated air fluid level, complete opacification or at least 6 mm mucosal thickening and/or endoscopy revealed purulent material within the drainage area of the sinuses. Using a modified version of the Hui and Walter procedure, the sensitivity and specificity of nasendoscopy was calculated against sinus radiography, a standard reference test, with known estimated sensitivity (76%) and specificity (79%). The findings show that 40 patients (34%) had positive endoscopy and radiography. Twenty patients (17%) had positive endoscopy and negative radiography, and vice versa in 15 (13%). In 42 patients (36%) both modalities were negative. Endoscopy yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 0.55-1.00) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 0.33-1.00). Although estimates seem better than those of radiography, the confidence intervals are quite wide and no firm conclusion is drawn. Neither single nor combination of symptoms, concurrent with two major and one minor factor advocated by the AAO-HNS Task Force on Rhinosinusitis, were associated with a positive diagnosis of ABRS. The data suggest that endoscopy is no less effective than radiography in predicting ABRS, also that clinical criteria are of rather limited diagnostic value, and thus should be supported by other diagnostic tests. Endoscopy is recommended as a first line diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of ABRS in routine ENT practice. If the outcome is negative, radiography may follow.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of accuracy of three-dimensional spiral computed tomography, standard radiography, and direct measurements in evaluating facial fracture healing in a rat model.

Complex maxillofacial fractures demand a detailed understanding of the three-dimensional (3D) pattern of injury. Evaluation of the outcome of the facial fracture repair additionally requires optimal demonstration of fracture gap, bony union, fibrous callus or incorporation of fracture ends, presence of incomplete fusion, or pseudoarthrosis. Although 3D computed tomography (CT) is reliably used for the diagnosis of complex facial fractures, its value in facial fracture healing is unknown. An experimental study was conducted to determine the accuracy of 3D spiral CT scans in evaluating facial fracture healing during the early and late postoperative periods. In 10 adult Wistar Albino rats, a standardized bone defect (3 mm) was created within the mid portion of each zygomatic arch (n = 20). At 10 and 20 weeks postfracture, gap distance displayed by 3D CT and plane radiography (posteroanterior) were measured. At 20 weeks postfracture, intraoperative measurement was also performed. A comparison between 3D CT, radiography, and intraoperative findings was performed. At 10 weeks postfracture, the fracture sites displayed larger bone defects in imaging with 3D CT than with plane radiography. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean defect size imaged by 3D CT was 0.91 +/- 0.82 mm (standard deviation) and by plane radiography was 0.42 +/- 0.16 mm. At 20 weeks postfracture, the mean defect size imaged by 3D CT was 0.56 +/- 0.64 mm, and by plane radiography was 0.38 +/- 0.22 mm. The difference between groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The defect size imaged by both plane radiography and 3D CT was significantly less than the measurement obtained from the intraoperative assessment (P < 0.05). It was concluded that 3D CT has limited benefit in the detection of newly formed bone at week 10 and in the detection of fibrous callus, which can eventually give rise to the bony tissue. Plane radiography is more valid during the early postoperative period (week 10), because it can detect the fibrous callus and newly formed bone more precisely. Gap distance between fracture ends could be determined by 3D CT accurately at week 20, although there was a tendency, which was not statistically significant, to overestimate the amount of bone defect measured by 3D CT when compared with that of plane radiography.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital selenium detector (Thoravision) with that of analog film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography in skeletal radiography for the detection of fissures and lesions in porcine bones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred bones taken from domestic pigs (50 ribs and 50 femurs) were divided into two equal groups. Fissures and bone lesions were created in 50 bones and 50 served as controls. The bones were examined using film-screen systems, digital luminescence radiography, and digital selenium radiography at various doses. Digital selenium radiography exposure values were adapted to the image geometry differing from the reference methods with a detector focus distance of 2.15 m. Four radiologists independently evaluated image quality and detectability of fissures and lesions on a five-point scale of confidence. Statistical evaluation was based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Fissures and bone lesions were detected most reliably using the mammography film-screen system, but the difference in the results of the analog and digital reference images did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Compared with analog film-screen systems, the lower spatial resolution of the digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography systems does not affect detectability of fissures and bone lesions in porcine bone. Selenium is effective in skeletal radiography for detecting fissures and bone lesions. With digital selenium and digital luminescence radiography, the surface dose can be cut to half that required for 200-speed film-screen systems without losing any diagnostically relevant information.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level.

Panoramic, bitewing and periapical radiography and probing for measurement of the marginal bone level were compared. Altogether 237 sites of 23 patients were examined. Radiographs were taken with a splint containing steel balls to allow calculation of the enlargement of the radiographs. Probing was done before and during flap surgery using the same splint. The open bone measurement represented the true value. All radiographs were assessed by 5 observers. The mean enlargement of panoramic radiography was 27% in the upper and 26% in the lower arch. For bitewing and periapical radiography, it was 8% in the upper and 4-5% in the lower arch. All methods underestimated the bone loss. Probing bone level before surgery was most accurate, deviating at most 5% from the true value. Periapical radiography was more accurate than panoramic and bitewing radiography (p less than 0.001). Panoramic radiography presented a slightly lower mean accuracy than bitewing radiography (p less than 0.05). The underestimation of the bone loss ranged from 13 to 32% in orthopantomograms, 11-23% in bitewing and 9-20% in periapical radiographs. The interobserver variation of the radiographic methods was substantial.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the number of radiographs taken in general dental practices equipped with digital radiography vs conventional film-based radiography and to determine the reasons for any difference in numbers. METHODS: In a mail survey, 473 questionnaires were sent to Dutch General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) using digital radiography and 105 questionnaires were sent to GDPs using film. The questionnaire concerned the number of intraoral radiographs taken in the dental practice, as well as possible reasons to take more or fewer radiographs after conversion to digital radiography. RESULTS: The response rate was 73%. Users of a phosphor plate system on average take 42.8 radiographs per week and solid-state system users take 48.4 radiographs, whereas film users take on average only 32.5 radiographs per week. The need for more certainty about the planned or ongoing treatment as well as better diagnostics were the most important reasons for taking more radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that GDPs using a system for digital radiography are more inclined to take radiographs than dentists taking conventional radiographs. Although digital intraoral radiography requires 50-80% less radiation per exposure than film, it is likely that the effective dose reduction after converting from conventional to digital radiography is less than 25% owing to the greater numbers of radiographs taken.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1991

Multimodal radiography: a new imaging technique and system for oral diagnosis.

The multimodal radiography system is based on the combined use of narrow-beam radiography and spiral tomography in one set of equipment. The essentials of a system are a multifunction unit, preprogrammed imaging procedures for various dentomaxillofacial objects and a co-ordinate system for object location. Four years of clinical experience have shown that multimodal radiography is effective for depicting dentomaxillofacial structures for diagnostic purposes. The detailed narrow beam imaging mode of multimodal radiography has also been compared with intraoral radiography as regards their abilities to reveal periodontal and periapical lesions. Preliminary results indicate that detailed narrow beam radiography is more accurate than intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of periodontal and periapical pathology.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed1991

Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.

The radiation dosage for the Orthopantomograph model OP5 was measured using two different sizes of collimators. The concordance between and accuracy of panoramic radiography and periapical and bitewing radiography was examined regarding assessment of the marginal bone level. The measurability of panoramic and periapical and bitewing radiographs was compared, as was the image quality of panoramic radiographs from one selected sample and two random samples. The energy imparted was 0.4-0.8 mJ for one panoramic radiograph. The use of the narrow collimator reduced the dosage by about one-third. The concordance between panoramic and intraoral radiography was high. In some anatomical regions, the concordance was as high as the intraobserver agreement for one and the same technique. The concordance was lower in sites with severe bone loss, however. Sounding was very accurate for the measurement of the marginal bone loss. Of the radiographic techniques, periapical radiography was most accurate. The observer performance for linear measurements of bone loss varied substantially and systematically among five observers. The measurability in the upper arch was the same in panoramic and periapical radiography. In the lower arch, the measurability of periapical radiography was better. The image quality of panoramic radiography influenced the measurability. The image quality of panoramic radiographs from random samples was inferior to that of the selected sample. It was concluded that, for the assessment of the marginal bone level, the panoramic radiograph should be the radiographic examination of choice, if increased image quality is achieved.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The ability to make an early, accurate diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has become increasingly important with the availability of new, expensive, and targeted therapies. However, plain radiography, the traditional method of detecting the characteristic bone erosions and an important adjunct in establishing a diagnosis of RA, is known to be insensitive. This study compared sonography, a modern imaging technique, with conventional radiography for the detection of erosions in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of patients with RA. METHODS: One hundred RA patients (including 40 with early disease) underwent posteroanterior radiography and sonography of the MCP joints of the dominant hand. Twenty asymptomatic control subjects also underwent sonography. Erosion sites were recorded and subsequently compared using each modality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on the second MCP joint in 25 patients with early RA to confirm the pathologic specificity of sonographic erosions. Intraobserver reliability of sonography readings was assessed using video recordings of 55 MCP joint scans of RA patients, and interobserver reliability was assessed by comparing 160 MCP joint scans performed sequentially by 2 independent observers. RESULTS: Sonography detected 127 definite erosions in 56 of 100 RA patients, compared with radiographic detection of 32 erosions (26 [81%] of which coincided with sonographic erosions) in 17 of 100 patients (P < 0.0001). In early disease, sonography detected 6.5-fold more erosions than did radiography, in 7.5-fold the number of patients. In late disease, these differences were 3.4-fold and 2.7-fold, respectively. On MRI, all sonographic erosions not visible on radiography (n = 12) corresponded by site to MRI abnormalities. The Cohen-kappa values for intra- and interobserver reliability of sonography were 0.75 and 0.76, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sonography is a reliable technique that detects more erosions than radiography, especially in early RA. Sonographic erosions not seen on radiography corresponded to MRI bone abnormalities. This technology has potential in the management of patients with early RA/inflammatory arthritis and is likely to have major implications for the future practice of rheumatology.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow and patient satisfaction.

Compared to traditional film radiography, digital radiography is believed to improve workflow and patient throughput. Digital radiography permits the technologist to immediately view the quality of the film directly at the modality. Additional workflow improvements, therefore, should be achieved with the integration of the radiology information system (RIS). To learn more about this proposed efficacy, a study was performed at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (Cleveland, OH) comparing timings in three groups: traditional film radiography; digital radiography; and digital radiography with RIS integration. Our data validated a timesaving of digital radiography over traditional or standard films and an even greater timesaving in a digital radiography/RIS environment.

Efficiency↗

PubMed2005

Sonography as an alternative to radiography for nasogastric feeding tube location.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bedside sonographic confirmation of weighted-tip nasogastric feeding tube position, by comparison to radiography. DESIGN AND SETTING: Single-center, double-blind prospective study in a 14-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU) in a 780-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-three ICU patients undergoing nasogastric tube insertion for enteral feeding. INTERVENTIONS: The tip of the nasogastric tube was located both by sonography and standard radiography. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The accuracy and procedure times of sonography and radiography for nasogastric tube tip location were compared during 35 procedures in 33 patients. The nasogastric tube tip was visualized by sonography in 34 of 35 procedures (sensitivity 97%) and by radiography in all procedures. The median length of the entire procedure was 24 min and 180 min with sonography and radiography, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside sonography performed by nonradiologists is a sensitive method for confirming the position of weighted-tip feeding nasogastric feeding tubes. It is more rapid than conventional radiography and can easily be taught to ICU physicians. Conventional radiography could be reserved for cases in which sonography is inconclusive.

Double-Blind Method↗

PubMed2006

Whole-body MRI of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: comparison with radiography and bone scintigraphy.

BACKGROUND: In Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) evaluation of the extent of disease is one of the major predictors of patient outcome. Historically this is undertaken using plain radiography and bone scintigraphy. Recently, whole-body (WB) MRI has been reported to be useful in detecting skeletal and extraskeletal metastases in both adults and children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of WB MRI in patients with LCH in comparison with plain radiography and bone scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In nine children (1-7 years of age; mean 3.3 years) who had a pathological diagnosis of LCH and had either plain radiography or bone scintigraphy for comparison, 43 WB MR examinations were performed. Skeletal and extraskeletal lesions of the disease on WB MRI were compared with those on plain radiography and bone scintigraphy. RESULTS: LCH showed unifocal single-system involvement in one patient, multifocal single-system involvement in three, and multifocal multisystem disease in five. WB MRI identified additional skeletal lesions in three (38%) of eight patients, compared with plain radiography, and in two (25%) of eight, compared with bone scintigraphy. WB MRI detected extraskeletal lesions of the disease in five (56%) of the nine patients exclusively, except for one patient whose lung lesions were also detected on plain radiography. In two patients, treatment was changed according to WB MRI findings. CONCLUSION: WB MRI is a useful initial and follow-up diagnostic method to assess the extent of LCH because WB MRI not only identifies more skeletal lesions of the disease than do plain radiography and bone scintigraphy, but also detects extraskeletal lesions of the disease.

Child↗

PubMed2000

Role of specimen radiography in patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

BACKGROUND: Specimen radiography is an important part of breast conservation surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to determine whether mastectomy specimen radiography could help in obtaining negative resection margins in patients with DCIS undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: Of 95 patients treated at our institution with SSM and IBR for DCIS, 35 had specimen radiography. The mastectomy specimen was first examined grossly and then inked, serially sectioned, and sent for radiographic assessment. Tissue slices containing calcifications were identified for pathologic evaluation. Additional tissue was excised if tumor was found near the inked margins or if calcifications were found near the radiographic margins. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients who had specimen radiography, the radiographic margins were free of calcifications in 30 patients (86%); of these patients, the margins on the final histologic examination were free of tumor in 27 and within 1 mm in 3. The other five patients (14%) had calcifications close to the radiographic margin; four underwent an intraoperative re-excision, but the margin for one of those four patients was still positive on final histologic examination. Margins were found to be negative by both mastectomy specimen radiography and histology in 77% of the patients. Of the 95 patients with DCIS, three patients (3%), none of whom had specimen radiography, developed local recurrences. One of these was successfully re-treated, one died as a result of synchronous distant metastases, and one was lost to follow-up. At a median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 93 patients (98%) were alive and free of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative radiography of mastectomy specimens may be useful for assessing margin status and for identifying the location of microcalcifications within tissue slices.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Do we really need plain and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies in the ED?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 3 imaging techniques-plain radiography, soft-tissue radiography, and ultrasonography-in detecting nonradiopaque foreign bodies in soft tissue. METHODS: In this randomized, blinded, and descriptive in vitro study, 40 chicken thighs with 2 types of nonradiopaque foreign bodies (wood and rubber) and 40 chicken thighs as part of a control group were evaluated to detect soft-tissue foreign bodies with plain radiography, soft-tissue radiography, and high-frequency ultrasonography. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive predictive and negative predictive values of plain radiography for both nonradiopaque foreign bodies were 5%, 90%, 33%, and 48%, respectively; those of soft-tissue radiography for both nonradiopaque foreign bodies were 5%, 90%, 33%, and 48%, respectively; and those of ultrasonography for both nonradiopaque foreign bodies were 90%, 80%, 81%, and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental model, the results show that high-frequency ultrasonography is superior to plain and soft-tissue radiographies and that the latter 2 techniques are similarly poor at detecting nonradiopaque foreign bodies.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and potential impact of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography, when applied in Canadian emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: The Canadian C-Spine Rule derivation study was a prospective cohort study conducted in 10 Canadian EDs that recruited alert and stable adult trauma patients. Physicians completed a 20-item data form for each patient and performed interobserver assessments when feasible. The prospective assessments included the 5 individual NEXUS criteria but not an explicit interpretation of the overall need for radiography according to the criteria. Patients underwent plain radiography, flexion-extension views, and computed tomography at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients who did not have radiography were followed up with a structured outcome assessment by telephone to determine clinically important cervical spine injury, a previously validated outcome measurement. Analyses included sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI), kappa coefficient, and potential radiography rates. RESULTS: Among 8,924 patients, 151 (1.7%) patients had an important cervical spine injury. The combined NEXUS criteria identified important cervical spine injury with a sensitivity of 92.7% (95% CI 87% to 96%) and a specificity of 37.8% (95% CI 37% to 39%). Application of the NEXUS criteria would have potentially reduced cervical spine radiography rates by 6.1% from the actual rate of 68.9% to 62.8%. Of 11 patients with important injuries not identified, 2 were treated with internal fixation and 3 with a halo. CONCLUSION: This retrospective validation found the NEXUS low-risk criteria to be less sensitive than previously reported. The NEXUS low-risk criteria should be further explicitly and prospectively evaluated for accuracy and reliability before widespread clinical use outside of the United States.

Adolescent↗