Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Prednisone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone in a case of hypothyroidism: effect of replacement therapy.

We found this particular case during the course of a clinical trial designed to assess the pharmacokinetics of oral prednisone in normal and diseased children. The plasma concentrations of prednisone, its main metabolite prednisolone, and endogenous cortisol were measured by HPLC at selected times during 8-h periods starting at 7:30 a.m. One 9.9-year-old administered prednisone 0.5mg/kg p.o. was found to be hypothyroid (TSH: 351microIU/mL; fT4: <2pg/mL; fT3: <1pg/mL); four age-matched normal boys (aged 6.6+/-4.9 years) served as a control group. In comparison with the controls, the hypothyroid boy showed a marked increase in the total AUC of prednisone (3360microg h/L versus 215+/-83microg h/L) and prednisolone (4040microg h/L versus 724+/-77microg h/L), and an altered pattern of endogenous cortisol, which is known to be impaired in hypothyroid subjects. After 6 months of thyroxine replacement therapy (75microg/day), the AUCs of prednisone and prednisolone returned to normal values (prednisone: 248microg h/L; prednisolone: 528microg h/L), as did the pattern of circadian cortisol secretion. In conclusion, our data indicate that the pharmacokinetics of prednisone and prednisolone can be profoundly altered by hypothyroidism, and subsequently restored by thyroxine replacement therapy.

Child↗
PubMed1999

Preservation of growth hormone secretion in response to growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 during prednisone therapy.

Children who require long-term glucocorticoid treatment often demonstrate poor growth. Growth hormone (GH) secretion is decreased during glucocorticoid treatment, and this decrease may be due to a relative excess of the hypothalamic hormone somatostatin (SRIF). GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) is a GH secretagogue that acts via multiple mechanisms at multiple sites. One of its proposed mechanisms is the ability to bypass SRIF blockade of GH secretion. We measured the ability of GHRP-2 to release GH before and during prednisone therapy (20 mg orally three times daily for 4 days). The degree of preservation of GH secretion and the pattern of GH release in response to GHRP-2 were compared with those observed in response to arginine, a known SRIF inhibitor. GH release in response to GHRP-2 and arginine was measured in the same eight subjects before and during prednisone therapy. Before prednisone, peak GH levels in response to arginine and GHRP-2 were 8.8 +/- 2.8 and 80.8 +/- 21.2 microg/L. During prednisone therapy, the peak GH level in response to arginine and to GHRP-2 was 20.1 +/- 8.3 and 71.3 +/- 18.4 microg/L, respectively. The difference in peak values before and after prednisone was not significant. The time to the peak GH level during prednisone therapy occurred sooner for both arginine and GHRP-2. The pattern of GH release to arginine and to GHRP-2 was not identical, and the mean area under the curve for GH release to GHRP-2 decreased significantly with steroid treatment (P = .04), suggesting that GHRP-2 acts by mechanisms additional to the removal of SRIF inhibition. GHRP-2 elicited a 10-fold greater GH response than arginine at baseline, and the GH response was threefold greater versus arginine even in the face of prednisone therapy. GH release occurred earlier for both arginine and GHRP-2 during steroid treatment. We propose that this may suggest an increased storage phenomenon due to the blockade of GH secretion by glucocorticoids and then a sudden release with SRIF inhibition. If GHRP-2 can indeed counteract the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on GH secretion, then a new form of therapy may be available to support growth in children who must receive long-term steroid treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Outpatient management of acute urticaria: the role of prednisone.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a 4-day "burst" course of prednisone added to standard treatment with H1 antihistamines for the management of acute urticaria in outpatients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. SETTING: Emergency department of an urban tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with urticarial rash of no more than 24 hours' duration, regardless of cause. Patients were excluded if they manifested wheezing, stridor, or angioedema or if they had taken antihistamines or glucocorticoids within 5 days of arrival at the ED. Patients also were excluded if there was a history of diabetes or active peptic ulcer disease. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were asked to evaluate the severity of pruritus ("itch score") on a 10-cm visual analog scale. Patients were then given diphenhydramine, 50 mg intramuscularly, and discharged home on a regimen of hydroxyzine, 25 mg orally, every 4 to 8 hours for pruritus, plus either prednisone, 20 mg, or placebo orally every 12 hours for 4 days. Patients' conditions were reassessed clinically, with itch score calculated again 2 days later, and again at 5 days by telephone. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled; 24 received prednisone and 19 received placebo. The two groups had similar itch scores at enrollment (prednisone, 8.1 +/- 1.7; placebo, 7.4 +/- 2.1, P = .25 [ANOVA]), but at 2- and 5-day follow-up the prednisone group had significantly lower itch scores (1.3 +/- 1.3 and .0 +/- .0 versus 4.4 +/- 2.2 and 1.6 +/- 1.0, respectively; P < .0001 [ANCOVA] at each interval) and greater clinical improvement in rash. Response did not correlate with age, sex, or identification of an allergen. No adverse effects were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: The addition of a prednisone burst improves the symptomatic and clinical response of acute urticaria to antihistamines. Patients' conditions improved more quickly and more completely when prednisone was administered, without any apparent adverse effects.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

High dose weekly oral prednisone improves strength in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Daily prednisone improves strength in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, but side effects are almost universal. We used a different dosing regimen of prednisone to determine if benefit to boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy might be maintained with fewer side effects. Twice weekly oral prednisone was given each Friday and Saturday (5mg/kg/dose). This total dose is twice as high as the daily low dosage prednisone regimen (0.75 mg/kg/day). Twenty boys (8.0+/-1.2 years) were treated. Historical control groups included 18 untreated boys (6.1+/-1.6 years) and four boys (7.3+/-0.6 years) treated with daily prednisone. Strength (using a hand-held manometer and grip meter) and timed functional testing were measured. There was an improvement in upper extremity strength for 95% of boys (n=20) at 6 months using quantitative strength testing. Improvement in lower extremity strength occurred in all boys with antigravity quadriceps strength (17/17). The improvement (P=0.001 for proximal upper extremities; P=0.002 for grip; and P<0.0001 for proximal lower extremities) was significant compared to untreated boys. Sixteen boys were treated continuously for more than 12 months (22+/-1.5 months). Of these, 15 remained significantly stronger than prior to treatment and 8/16 showed additional gains in strength after six months of treatment. Six boys were on the weekly prednisolone 2 years or longer without interruption. All six had upper and lower extremity strength at follow-up that was as good or better than at baseline. Functional testing improved in boys less than 8 years without contractures. Three boys without antigravity quadriceps strength at the start of treatment lost the ability to walk unassisted within 6 months. Eight other boys lost the ability to ambulate unassisted between 12 and 24 months of treatment. In each, progressive contractures developed. Linear growth was maintained in all boys on weekly treatment. Obesity rates did not differ from untreated boys. Twice weekly prednisone improved strength over 6-12 months in the majority of boys, but did not slow contracture development. Sustained benefit beyond 12 months is possible with fewer side effects compared to daily prednisone.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1982

Prednisone and prednisolone bioavailability in renal transplant patients.

Prednisone and prednisolone are drugs with the potential for therapeutic inequivalence due to bioavailability problems. The objective of our study was to compare the systemic bioavailability of prednisolone from oral prednisone and prednisolone. Nine kidney transplant patients receiving prednisone (12.5 to 22.5 mg per day) were administered, in a randomized fashion, the same dose of oral prednisone (Deltasone), oral prednisolone (Delta-cortef) and intravenous prednisolone (Hydeltrasol). Prednisolone and prednisone levels were measured using a specific high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay. Since prednisolone exhibits dose-dependent pharmacokinetics because of nonlinear plasma protein binding, bioavailability from oral prednisone and oral prednisolone, compared to the intravenous dose, was 84.5 +/- 17.8% and 95.5 +/- 17.6% using unbound drug concentrations. These differences were not statistically significant. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two oral formulations in peak prednisolone levels, time of peak levels or half-life using either total or unbound drug concentrations. The results from our study indicate that both of the oral preparations tested provide similar bioavailability of active prednisolone and the conversion of prednisone to prednisolone occurs rapidly.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Randomized, double-blind six-month trial of prednisone in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy.

We performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled six-month trial of prednisone in 103 boys with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (age, 5 to 15 years). The patients were assigned to one of three regimens: prednisone, 0.75 mg per kilogram of body weight per day (n = 33); prednisone, 1.5 mg per kilogram per day (n = 34); or placebo (n = 36). The groups were initially comparable in all measures of muscle function. Both prednisone groups had significant improvement of similar degree in the summary scores of muscle strength and function. Improvement began as early as one month and peaked by three months. At six months the high-dose prednisone group, as compared with the placebo group, had improvement in the time needed to rise from a supine to a standing position (3.4 vs. 6.2 seconds), to walk 9 m (7.0 vs. 9.7 seconds), and to climb four stairs (4.0 vs. 7.1 seconds), in lifting a weight (2.1 vs. 1.2 kg), and in forced vital capacity (1.7 vs. 1.5 liters) (P less than 0.001 for all comparisons). There was an increase in urinary creatinine excretion (261 vs. 190 mg per 24 hours), which suggested an increase in total muscle mass. However, the prednisone-treated patients who had required long-leg braces (n = 5) or wheelchairs (n = 11) continued to require them. The most frequent side effects were weight gain, cushingoid appearance, and excessive hair growth. We conclude from this six-month study that prednisone improves the strength and function of patients with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. However, further research is required to identify the mechanisms responsible for these improvements and to determine whether prolonged treatment with corticosteroids may be warranted despite their side effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Outpatient oral prednisone after emergency treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we studied the effectiveness of prednisone in reducing the risk of relapse after outpatient exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We enrolled 147 patients who were being discharged from the emergency department after an exacerbation of COPD and randomly assigned them to 10 days of treatment with 40 mg of oral prednisone once daily or identical-appearing placebo. All patients received oral antibiotics for 10 days, plus inhaled bronchodilators. The primary end point was relapse, defined as an unscheduled visit to a physician's office or a return to the emergency department because of worsening dyspnea, within 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: The overall rate of relapse at 30 days was lower in the prednisone group than in the placebo group (27 percent vs. 43 percent, P=0.05), and the time to relapse was prolonged in those taking prednisone (P=0.04). After 10 days of therapy, patients in the prednisone group had greater improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second than did patients in the placebo group (mean [+/-SD] increase from base line, 34+/-42 percent vs. 15+/-31 percent; P=0.007). Patients in the prednisone group also had significant improvements in dyspnea, as measured by the transitional dyspnea index (P=0.04) and by the dyspnea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Index Questionnaire (P=0.02), but not in health-related quality of life (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment with oral prednisone offers a small advantage over placebo in treating patients who are discharged from the emergency department with an exacerbation of COPD.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy palliates pain without extending survival in men with progressive androgen-independent prostate cancer. We compared docetaxel plus estramustine with mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic, hormone-independent prostate cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 770 men to one of two treatments, each given in 21-day cycles: 280 mg of estramustine three times daily on days 1 through 5, 60 mg of docetaxel per square meter of body-surface area on day 2, and 60 mg of dexamethasone in three divided doses before docetaxel, or 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter on day 1 plus 5 mg of prednisone twice daily. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, objective response rates, and post-treatment declines of at least 50 percent in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. RESULTS: Of 674 eligible patients, 338 were assigned to receive docetaxel and estramustine and 336 to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the median overall survival was longer in the group given docetaxel and estramustine than in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (17.5 months vs. 15.6 months, P=0.02 by the log-rank test), and the corresponding hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.97). The median time to progression was 6.3 months in the group given docetaxel and estramustine and 3.2 months in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (P<0.001 by the log-rank test). PSA declines of at least 50 percent occurred in 50 percent and 27 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001), and objective tumor responses were observed in 17 percent and 11 percent of patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, respectively (P=0.30). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic fevers (P=0.01), nausea and vomiting (P<0.001), and cardiovascular events (P=0.001) were more common among patients receiving docetaxel and estramustine than among those receiving mitoxantrone and prednisone. Pain relief was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in median survival of nearly two months with docetaxel and estramustine, as compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone, provides support for this approach in men with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Effects of prednisone on the cellular responses and release of cytokines and mediators after segmental allergen challenge of asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Systemic glucocorticoids are a major therapy for the management of allergic inflammation and asthma; however, information about their effects in vivo are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to examine the effects of prednisone on inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and cellular responses in the model of segmental allergen challenge (SAC) of allergic asthmatic subjects. METHODS: The effects of a 3-day pretreatment with oral prednisone (30 mg twice daily) on the physiologic and inflammatory responses to SAC were studied in 10 allergic asthmatic subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol. RESULTS: Prednisone improved baseline FEV(1) by 10% and modestly inhibited the SAC-induced fall in FEV(1) at 30 minutes and at 6 to 8 hours. Five minutes after challenge, levels of histamine, PGD(2), 9alpha,11beta-PGF(2), and thromboxane B(2) increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (median increase, 5- to 14-fold); prednisone did not inhibit these responses. Prednisone inhibited (median decrease, 66%-97%) the total influx of inflammatory cells, specifically eosinophils, basophils, and some subsets of T lymphocytes (CD4, CD45RA, and CD45RO cells) assessed 19 hours after SAC, but it did not inhibit the influx of neutrophils. Increases in soluble E-selectin, kinins, and albumin were also inhibited by the glucocorticoid (median decrease, 36%-74%). Prednisone treatment inhibited the appearance of mRNA, protein, or both for T(H)2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5), as well as for IL-2 and transforming growth factor alpha, but did not inhibit increases of immunoreactive GM-CSF in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. CONCLUSION: These studies indicate that prednisone suppresses multiple components of allergic airway inflammation, including cell recruitment, adhesion molecule expression or release, airway permeability, and production of cytokines potentially involved in airway immunity or remodeling.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

New role for an old friend: prednisone is a disease-modifying agent in early rheumatoid arthritis.

There has been a renewed interest in the use of low doses of prednisone in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. This is because it has been conclusively shown that low doses of prednisone retard bone damage, and physicians use prednisone because it helps control tender and swollen joints. Two studies appeared in 2002, one by van Everdingen et al. and one by Landewe et al. demonstrating the reduction of bone damage in early RA with the use of prednisone. Van Everdingen used 10 mg/day of prednisone and Landewe used an initial high dose of 60 mg/day of prednisone for a week, tapering off by 6 months. The bone sparing effect was still evident at 5 years. Low doses of prednisone are well tolerated, with documented side effects including weight gain, ecchymosis, and osteopenia.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2002

Mood changes during prednisone bursts in outpatients with asthma.

Corticosteroids, such as prednisone and dexamethasone, are frequently prescribed medications sometimes associated with severe systemic side effects. Currently there are limited data regarding the psychiatric side effects of these medications, although mood changes and even psychoses have been reported. This study was designed to quantify psychiatric changes during brief courses of prednisone in patients with asthma. Outpatients with asthma (N = 32) receiving bursts of prednisone (>40 mg/day) were evaluated before, during, and after corticosteroid therapy by use of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Young Mania Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the Internal State Scale. A Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders was also conducted to examine past psychiatric history. Highly significant increases in the Young Mania Scale and Activation subscale of the Internal State Scale (both measures of mania) were observed with no increase in depression measures during the first 3 to 7 days of prednisone therapy. Mood changes were not correlated with improvement in airway obstruction, suggesting that mood elevations may not be in response to improvement in asthma symptoms. Subjects with past or current symptoms of depression had a significant decrease in depressive symptoms during prednisone therapy compared with those without depression. Some patients with posttraumatic stress disorder reported increases in depression and memories of the traumatic event during prednisone therapy. In summary, statistically significant changes in mood were observed even during brief courses of corticosteroids at modest dosages. The symptoms were primarily manic, not depressive. Persons with depression did not become more depressed during prednisone therapy, and, in fact, some showed improvement.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Simultaneous determination of plasma prednisolone, prednisone, and cortisol levels by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Recipients of organ transplants remain particularly dependent on prednisolone as part of their maintenance immunosuppression. Despite this, the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone have never been fully characterized in these patients, and consequently dosing remains empirical. Accurate monitoring of prednisolone, its primary metabolite prednisone, and endogenous cortisol suppression in such patients may provide a means of improving the clinical outcome by adjusting for variability in prednisolone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Measurement of endogenous cortisol may provide an independent marker of prednisolone pharmacodynamics. A simple isocratic reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography procedure, using betamethasone as an internal standard, was developed to quantify plasma prednisolone, prednisone, and cortisol simultaneously. The steroids were extracted from 0.5 mL plasma with 3 mL (1:1 v/v) ethyl acetate/tert-methyl butyl ether and 0.1 mL phosphoric acid, washed in 0.1 mol/L NaOH before a final drying step and reconstitution in mobile phase for injection. Separation was achieved using a Supelcosil LC-18-DB, 150 x 4.6-mm, 5-microm particle size, reverse-phase column attached to a Newguard 15 x 3-mm, RP8 guard column maintained at 25 degreesC, with ultraviolet detector set at 254 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 16% isopropanol in water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, set at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The assay was linear up to 1,002 microg/L for prednisolone, 982 microg/L for prednisone, and 545 microg/L for cortisol. Mean intra-assay and interassay imprecision levels were 6.0% and 7.2%, respectively, for prednisolone, 5.8% and 7.2% for prednisone, and 5.6% and 7.9% for cortisol. Intra-assay inaccuracy was <7% of nominal values for prednisolone, prednisone, and cortisol. The lower limit of quantification was 7 microg/L for prednisolone and prednisone and 10 microg/L for cortisol. Corticosteroid recoveries were 73%, 74%, and 90% for prednisolone, prednisone, and cortisol, respectively. The authors describe a robust, inexpensive, and simple method suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring or pharmacokinetic studies of prednisolone; it may also be used to measure the suppression of endogenous cortisol production.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2004

In utero prednisone exposure affects genital development.

PURPOSE: The etiology of the worldwide incidence of hypospadias remains unexplained. Data from the Center for Disease Control suggest that maternal asthma exposure may be a risk factor. The development of the mouse and human urethra shows significant similarities, such as fusion of 2 epithelial edges, closure of a midline epithelial seam and subsequent cellular remodeling, to justify the use of the mouse as an experimental animal model. Prednisone may act as a weak androgen directly or alternatively lowering testosterone by hypothalamic suppression of gonadotropins. We describe the effects of prednisone on urethral formation in the mouse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model comprised 10, 20 and 20 timed pregnant C57/6 mice exposed to 1,000, 200 and 100 mg/kg prednisone, respectively, on gestational days 12 through 18. The morphology of the genital tubercles of both sexes were examined on gestational day 19 using histological techniques and 3-dimensional computer reconstruction. Specific attention was focused on the developing urethral seam. RESULTS: Microscopic serial analysis confirmed the presence of an arrest in seam formation in approximately 25% of male fetuses given supraphysiological doses of prednisone (1,000 mg/kg). In contrast, acceleration of urethral fold fusion and a longer urethral tube were observed in those males treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg prednisone. The female fetuses treated with the same dosages of prednisone did not show any change at the level of the urethral seam area or in the remainder of the genital tubercles. CONCLUSIONS: Supraphysiological doses of prednisone treatment has an inhibitory effect on urethral fold fusion leading to hypospadias whereas low doses accentuate urethra formation in male mouse fetuses. In mice lower doses do not cause hypospadias in the males or affect urethral formation in females.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Bone mineral density in Crohn's disease: a longitudinal study of budesonide, prednisone, and nonsteroid therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids may contribute to the bone loss associated with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the effect on bone mineral density (BMD) of treatment with budesonide, a steroid with low systemic activity, and compared the outcome with prednisone and nonsteroid therapy in patients with CD. METHODS: Prospective annual BMDs of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were measured for 2 yr in 138 patients with quiescent CD treated with mean daily doses of 8.5 mg of budesonide (n = 48), 10.5 mg of prednisone (n = 45), or nonsteroid drugs (n = 45). RESULTS: Between baseline and 1 yr, the mean LS BMD decreased 2.36% in the budesonide group (p < 0.001), 0.61% in the prednisone group (ns), and 0.09% in the nonsteroid group (ns). The difference between budesonide and nonsteroid groups was significant (p = 0.003). In the 2nd yr, LS BMD did not change in the three groups. After 2 yr, FN BMD decreased 2.94% in the budesonide group (p < 0.01), 0.36% in the prednisone group (ns), and 1.05% in the nonsteroid group (ns); the differences among groups were not significant. The proportion of patients with bone loss of >2% per annum at the LS and FN was higher in the budesonide group than in the nonsteroid group (p < 0.001) and prednisone group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CD receiving maintenance treatment for 2 yr with prednisone show little change in BMD, whereas treatment with budesonide may be associated with LS and FN bone loss. Budesonide does not confer an advantage over low-dose prednisone for the preservation of BMD.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed2005

Prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression-a 5-year experience.

Concern persists that prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients will be associated with an increase in late allograft dysfunction and graft loss. We herein report 5-year follow-up of a trial of prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression. From October 1, 1999, through January 31, 2005, at our center, 589 kidney transplant recipients were treated with a protocol incorporating discontinuation of their prednisone on postoperative day 6. At 5 years, actuarial patient survival was 91%; graft survival, 84%; death-censored graft survival, 92%; acute rejection-free graft survival, 84% and chronic rejection-free graft survival, 87%. The mean serum creatinine level (+/-SD) at 1 year was 1.6 +/- 0.6; at 5 years, 1.7 +/- 0.8. In all, 86% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain prednisone-free as of April 30, 2005. As compared with historical controls, recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had a significantly lower rate of a number of complications, including cataracts (p < 0.001), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), avascular necrosis (p = 0.001), and fractures (p = 0.004). We conclude that prednisone-related side effects can be minimized in a protocol incorporating prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression. Five-year graft outcome remains good.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cyclophosphamide exerts no beneficial effect over prednisone alone in the initial treatment of acute immune-mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Cyclophosphamide is commonly used with prednisone in the initial treatment of severe idiopathic immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in dogs because retrospective reports suggest its benefit. This randomized controlled prospective clinicaltrial evaluated whether combined cyclophosphamide and prednisone therapy is more efficacious than prednisone therapy alone in the initial treatment of IMHA. Eighteen dogs with acute, severe idiopathic IMHA were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. The P group received prednisone therapy alone (1-2 mg/kg PO q12h), and the PC group received prednisone (1-2 mg/kg PO q12h) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2 PO q24h for 4 consecutive days a week) for 4 weeks. The mortality rate in the P group was 20% (2 of 10), and in the PC group, the mortality rate was 38% (3 of 8). There was no difference in sequential CBC evaluations between the 2 groups. However, whereas dogs in the P group showed increases in reticulocyte count, reticulocytosis was suppressed in dogs in the PC group during the 1st week of therapy. Spherocytosis resolved more quickly in the P group (day 21) than in the PC group (day 28), but the time taken to achieve a negative Coombs' test result was comparable between groups. No difference was observed in the volume of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) given per transfusion between treatment groups, but more dogs in the PC group required a 2nd transfusion. The results of this limited study suggest that cyclophosphamide plus prednisone has no benefit over prednisone alone in the initial treatment of acute, severe idiopathic IMHA indogs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1980

Impaired conversion of prednisone to prednisolone in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Fourteen patients with liver cirrhosis received oral prednisone or prednisolone (0.3 mg per kg) randomised on two consecutive days. Serum prednisone and prednisolone were measured over the following four hours. Mean serum prednisolone concentration after oral prednisone decreased with impaired liver function estimated by galactose elimination capacity (r = 0.64, P less than 0.03). Mean serum prednisolone concentration after oral prednisone in the seven patients with severely impaired liver function was only 53% (P less than 0.05) of that observed in the seven patients with slightly impaired liver function. Conversely, mean serum prednisone concentration after oral prednisone in the patients with severely impaired liver function was 74% higher (P = 0.05) than in patients with slightly impaired liver function. Mean serum prednisolone after oral prednisolone was independent of liver function. As only prednisolone exerts glucocorticoid activity, our results indicate that prednisolone should be preferred to prednisone in the treatment of patients with impaired liver function.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

A randomised clinical trial comparing prednisone and azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Results of the second interim analysis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group.

From January 1983 to October 1990, 41 patients with generalised myasthenia gravis were randomly given either prednisone or azathioprine. The main goal was to record the time to the occurrence of the first episode of deterioration. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, 21 patients showed deterioration, 12 in the prednisone group and nine in the azathioprine group (p = 0.40). No difference was observed between the two groups in muscular score and functional grade, assessed at the end of each treatment year, or in tolerance. Treatment failure occurred in 17 patients, 12 in the prednisone group and five in the azathioprine group (p = 0.02); even after adjustment for imbalances in prognostic features, the failure rate remained 2.8 times higher in the prednisone group than in the azathioprine group (p = 0.5). In the patients in whom treatment failed, symptoms were initially more severe than in the others, but the combination of prednisone and azathioprine resulted in clinical improvement, consisting of remission or only minor deficits in half of the patients after two years of treatment. These findings indicate that azathioprine increases treatment response compared with prednisone, although no difference in the duration of improvement was demonstrated. Nevertheless, it appears that the most severe forms of the disease, often resistant to prednisone or azathioprine alone, could benefit from the combination of both drugs.

Adult↗