SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PRESSURE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Is the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices underestimated at increasing blood pressure levels?

BACKGROUND: In validation studies reporting on the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices (ambulatory and non-ambulatory systems), it is frequently stated that the accuracy of blood pressure devices seems to decrease at increasing blood pressure levels. This has been shown for several ambulatory devices in the past. Whether more recently validated devices are less accurate at increasing blood pressure levels is unknown, however. OBJECTIVES: We therefore retrospectively searched the literature for studies performed between 1993 and 2003, reporting on the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices over different blood pressure levels. When needed, additional information from the authors was requested. METHODS: In total, 30 studies were selected. Of these, the studies reporting on the accuracy of 14 different ambulatory and nine different non-ambulatory devices were useful. For both ambulatory and non-ambulatory devices, accuracy appeared to decrease at increasing blood pressure levels. This was particularly shown for systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: We speculate whether this finding is due to the oscillometric method of blood pressure measurement. Another explanation may exist, however. Blood pressure variability increases with higher blood pressure. Further, the British Hypertension Society protocol 1993 uses sequential measurements. This may be the reason that, owing to the increased blood pressure variability, the accuracy of most devices tends to decrease at higher blood pressure levels. Consequently, the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices may be underestimated at higher blood pressure levels. CONCLUSION: Currently used automated blood pressure measurement devices seem to be less accurate at increasing blood pressure levels. It is important to be aware of this phenomenon when treating hypertensive patients. The reported decrease in accuracy, however, may well be explained by the increasing blood pressure variability at increasing blood pressure and the use of sequential measurements. If this is the case, then the accuracy of these devices is perhaps underestimated.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed2006

Assessment of blood pressure control in hypertensive stroke survivors: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the sensitivity of office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings in evaluating the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment and identified factors related to inadequate blood pressure control among hypertensive stroke survivors. METHODS: Office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measurements were performed at 120+/-30 days after ictus in 187 first-ever consecutive hypertensive stroke survivors who were receiving blood pressure-lowering medications according to international guidelines. Handicap was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. Blood pressure was regarded as controlled if office and daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were <140/90 and <135/85 mmHg, respectively. Patients were subclassified according to the degree of their nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall [(mean daytime values-mean night-time values)100/mean daytime values] as dippers (>or=10%), nondippers (>or=0% and <10%) and reverse dippers (<0%). RESULTS: Effective blood pressure control was documented in significantly (P<0.001) fewer patients using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (32.1%) than those using office recordings (43.3%), whereas in 16% of the study population a masked lack of per-treatment blood pressure control (elevated ambulatory blood pressure in the presence of normal office blood pressure levels) was identified. The distribution of dipping patterns differed significantly (P=0.01) between controlled hypertensive individuals (normal office and ambulatory measurements) and patients with isolated ambulatory hypertension (dippers: 31.3 vs. 10.0%; nondippers:56.9 vs. 53.3%; reverse dippers: 11.8 vs. 36.7%). Logistic regression analysis revealed diabetes mellitus and functional independency (modified Rankin Scale score<2) as independent predictors of inadequate blood pressure control. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring detects a substantial number of treated hypertensive stroke survivors with a masked lack of per-treatment blood pressure control, who present a higher prevalence of abnormal circadian blood pressure patterns (reverse dipping). Diabetes mellitus and poststroke functional independency are the main factors contributing to inadequate blood pressure control.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Pulmonary capillary pressure in horses undergoing alteration of pleural pressure by imposition of various upper airway resistive loads.

We hypothesized that changes in pleural pressure induced by resistive breathing would affect transmural pulmonary artery, pulmonary capillary, and pulmonary wedge pressures. Seven horses were assigned to exercise with each of 4 upper respiratory resistive loads in random order at intervals of at least 2 days: 1) control--no added resistive loads; 2) inspiratory resistive load (Iobst)--left laryngeal hemiplegia; 3) expiratory resistive load (Eobst)--one-way valve in the right nostril; and 4) combined inspiratory and expiratory resistive loads (CIEobst)--left nostril occlusion. On each occasion, the horses performed an incremental exercise protocol consisting of exercise episodes of 3 min duration at 75, 90, and 100% of maximal heart rate (HRmax). Pulmonary artery and oesophageal pressures were recorded continuously. Subsequent analysis was carried out on the pulmonary arterial pressure signal with the oesophageal pressure signal subtracted, hence the pulmonary vascular pressures in this paper approximate transmural pressures. Pulmonary vascular pressures, heart rate, and arterial blood gas tensions were measured at each level of exercise. Pulmonary capillary and pulmonary wedge pressures were determined from the pulmonary artery waveform after dynamic occlusion of a branch of the pulmonary artery. During exercise, peak expiratory oesophageal pressure was more positive in horses with Eobst and CIEobst (adjusted means = 43, and 39 mmHg, respectively) compared with control (adjusted mean = 23 mmHg) (P = 0.0001). Peak inspiratory oesophageal pressure was more negative in horses at exercise with Iobst and CIEobst (adjusted means = -42 and -39 mmHg, respectively) compared with control (adjusted mean = -26 mmHg) (P = 0.0012). Eobst was associated with an increase in mean oesophageal pressure while Iobst was associated with a decrease in mean oesophageal pressure. There were significant increases in mean pulmonary artery pressure in horses with CIEobst (adjusted means = 82 mmHg) and in pulmonary wedge pressure in horses with CIEobst and Iobst (adjusted means = 51, and 55 mmHg, respectively) when compared to control (73 and 42 mmHg, respectively) (P = 0.0001). Pulmonary capillary pressure was significantly increased in horses with CIEobst or Iobst (adjusted means = 61 mmHg, 63 mmHg, respectively) when compared to control (adjusted mean = 50 mmHg)(P = 0.0001). At maximal exercise intensity with inspiratory obstruction, the mean oesophageal (pleural) pressure was -17 mmHg while the mean pulmonary capillary pressure was 77 mmHg. The latter exceeds the reported 75 mmHg threshold for capillary failure in horses. We conclude that inspiratory resistive breathing can lead to a significant increase in transmural pulmonary capillary pressure which may contribute to loss of capillary integrity and rupture.

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed1989

Cardiovascular responses in the laboratory and in the natural environment: is blood pressure reactivity to laboratory-induced mental stress related to ambulatory blood pressure during everyday life?

Cardiovascular activity recorded at rest and during mental stress in the laboratory was studied in relation to ambulatory recorded cardiovascular activity at work and at home. Fifty-five Type A men (M = 42.4 years) underwent a standardized laboratory mental stress protocol in which systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at baseline and during a 15 min mental arithmetic task (MAT). On a subsequent day, ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 20 minute intervals for 12-14 hr during normal activities at home and at work. Subjects completed a behavioral diary concurrently with each cuff inflation. High and Low groups were identified based upon a median split of their cardiovascular response levels at baseline and during the MAT. Subjects with high systolic blood pressure levels during the MAT had high systolic blood pressure at home, at work, during physical activity, and when they reported being 'stressed'. Baseline systolic blood pressure in the laboratory was less consistently related to ambulatory systolic pressure across ambulatory conditions. Diastolic blood pressure at baseline was related to ambulatory diastolic blood pressure at work, at home, and when resting. Diastolic blood pressure during the MAT was associated with higher diastolic pressure at work and at home. Heart rate at baseline and during the MAT was related to heart rate at work and during physical activity. Change scores derived by subtracting mean values during the MAT from baseline resting levels were not associated with ambulatory blood pressures or heart rates under any daily conditions. In the best case, systolic blood pressure measured during the MAT was related to systolic blood pressure during physical activity, to systolic blood pressure and heart rate during mental stress, to systolic and diastolic blood pressure at rest, and to systolic blood pressure and heart rate at work but not at home. We conclude that levels of blood pressure and heart rate measured in the laboratory, but not reactivity (i.e, change scores) during the MAT, are related to blood pressure and heart rate levels recorded in the natural environment, especially in the work setting.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1987

Supratentorial pressures. Part I: Differential intracranial pressures.

Dynamic supratentorial pressure changes may differentially alter tissue pressure and intraventricular fluid pressure. To evaluate these pressures, we used a floppy cuff intracerebral catheter and an intraventricular catheter in the cat and rhesus monkey. Baseline intraventricular pressures exceeded intracerebral pressure in both species. Intraventricular pressure was 3-4 mmHg in cats and 6-14 mmHg in monkeys, while the intracerebral pressure was in the range 0-4 mmHg in both. Saline injection into the spinal or cranial subarachnoid space resulted in a greater increase in ventricular fluid pressure, and the time for return to baseline was one and a half times longer in the intraventricular compartment. Jugular venous and abdominal compression resulted in a greater rise in the ventricular pressure than intracerebral pressure. Inflation of subdural balloons and intracerebral injection of silicone caused a differential pressure across the brain with the pressure being greatest in the ipsilateral hemisphere and lowest in the contralateral hemisphere. Rapidly evolving epidural masses produced varied results. We did not evaluate compensatory pressure changes in these animals. Those pressures that involve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics alter intraventricular pressure more than tissue pressure. Alternatively, rapidly forming masses tend to increase tissue pressure near the mass more than intraventricular pressure.

Animals↗

PubMed1986

Effects of left ventricular diastolic pressure on the pressure-flow relation of the coronary circulation during physiological vasodilatation.

A study to analyse the effects of left ventricular diastolic pressure on coronary pressure-flow relations during physiological vasodilatation was carried out in 14 anaesthetised dogs. The left circumflex artery was perfused at controlled pressures via an extracorporeal circuit and vasodilatation induced by 15 s occlusion of coronary flow. The relation between end diastolic coronary perfusion pressure and flow at peak hyperaemia was linear above 40 mmHg (group 1, n = 7) and became curvilinear at perfusion pressures below 40 mmHg (group 2, n = 7). At a mean left ventricular end diastolic pressure of 8.6(0.8) mmHg the mean zero flow intercept (Pint) in group 1 was 22.5(2.3) mmHg. Graded increases in left ventricular end diastolic pressure by infusion of blood resulted in a parallel rightward shift of the vasodilated pressure-flow relation (Pint = 1.06 X LVEDP + 13.8 mmHg, r = 0.87). The curvilinear relations at low perfusion pressures in group 2 had lower zero flow intercept pressures (Pint = 4.8(0.7) mmHg at left ventricular end diastolic pressure 6.6(1.5) mmHg). As with group 1, graded increases in left ventricular end diastolic pressure caused a rightward shift of the pressure-flow relation, with a direct relation between left ventricular end diastolic pressure and zero flow intercept (Pint = 0.93 X LVEDP + 3.9 mmHg, r = 0.89). Diastolic coronary pressure-flow relations during physiological vasodilatation are essentially linear at perfusion pressures greater than 40 mmHg but are appreciably curved at lower pressures. Increases in left ventricular end diastolic pressure cause a parallel rightward shift of the linear region of the pressure-flow relation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Limited (6-h) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a valid replacement for the office blood pressure by trained nurse clinician in the diagnosis of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as a valid replacement for office blood pressure measurement done to American Heart Association criteria in diagnosing hypertension. METHODS: In all, 105 adults, who had been referred for limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, participated in the study. Limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring consisted of 6 h of blood pressure measurement while ambulatory at the Mayo Clinic, using a SpaceLabs 90207 (SpaceLabs Medical, Issaquah, Washington, USA) collecting six readings per hour for the period of observation. The study participants gave consent for three additional consecutive office blood pressure measurements, using a validated aneroid device, done to American Heart Association criteria, by a single hypertension nurse specialist. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure by limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 137.9+/-14.2 mmHg and for the nurse, 137.9+/-20.1 mmHg. Mean diastolic blood pressure by limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 81.5+/-9.7 mmHg and for the nurse, 74.3+/-11.9 mmHg. The intermethod difference for systolic blood pressure was 0.03+/-12.5 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure, -7.2+/-8.0 mmHg. Using <140/90 as criteria factor, limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and the trained nurse agreed 77% of the time on whether the patient was hypertensive. This agreement increased to 81% if the participant's referral blood pressure was >or=140/90. CONCLUSIONS: Limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is an excellent replacement for office blood pressure, done to American Heart Association criteria, in diagnosing hypertension. This avoids issues of variability introduced by the observers, such as digit preference and bias, and increases reproducibility of blood pressure measurements. The appropriate normal value for limited ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is <140/90 mmHg compared with <135/85 mmHg used in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Home blood pressure in poorly controlled hypertension: relationship with ambulatory blood pressure and organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess whether home blood pressure measurement is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the evaluation of treated patients with inadequate blood pressure control at the clinic; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between home blood pressure and several target-organ damage markers. BASIC METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 225 treated hypertensive patients with persistently high blood pressure values at the clinic (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg). All study participants underwent clinic blood pressure measurement, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure monitoring. A subgroup of patients underwent the following procedures: carotid echography (n=74), microalbuminuria determination (n=88) and echocardiography (n=43). We defined out-of-clinic normotension as an average ambulatory or home blood pressure less than 135 mmHg (systolic) and 85 mmHg (diastolic). MAIN RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the home blood pressure method for predicting out-of-clinic normotension (with the ambulatory method used as reference), expressed as percentages, were 50, 87, 64 and 79%, respectively. Systolic home blood pressure correlated significantly with left ventricular mass (r=0.33, P<0.05) and microalbuminuria (r=0.24, P<0.05). Similar correlation coefficients were found for systolic ambulatory blood pressure (r=0.32, P<0.05 and r=0.24, P<0.05, respectively). Clinic blood pressure did not correlate with either left ventricular mass or microalbuminuria (r=0.19, P=0.09 and r=0.19, P=0.24, respectively). Diastolic home blood pressure, but not ambulatory blood pressure, correlated negatively with mean carotid intima-media thickness (r=-0.27, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that, in patients with poorly controlled hypertension at the clinic, home blood pressure represents a complementary test rather than an alternative to ambulatory blood pressure, and correlates with several target-organ damage markers.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

The effects of pressurization rate on breathing pattern, work of breathing, gas exchange and patient comfort in pressure support ventilation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different pressurization rates during pressure support ventilation on breathing pattern, work of breathing, gas exchange and patient comfort in patients with acute lung injury. The pressurization rate modifies the initial pressure ramp by changing the initial peak flow rate: the increase in pressurization rate is associated with a decrease in the time to reach the level of pressure support ventilation by increasing the peak flow rate. Ten intubated patients (age 64+/-17 yrs, body mass index 24+/-17 Kg x m(-2), arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction 214+/-59) were studied in random order varying the pressurization rate at 5 and 15 cmH2O of pressure support ventilation. Breathing comfort was evaluated by a visual analogue scale. Increasing the pressurization rate caused an increase of peak flow rate from 473+/-141 mL x s(-1) to 758+/-302 mL x s(-1) at pressure support ventilation 5 (p<0.05) and from 481+/-126 mL x s(-1) to 1,121+/-175 mL x s(-1) at pressure support ventilation 15 (p<0.05). At the lowest pressurization rate the tidal volume was the lowest, the respiratory rate and the work of breathing were the highest (p<0.05) compared with other pressurization rates. Excluding the lowest pressurization rate, in all the other pressurization rates tested the breathing pattern and the work of breathing did not change. The lowest and the highest pressurization rates caused the worst patient comfort (p<0.05). The gas exchange was stable throughout the study. The presented results suggest: 1) the lowest pressurization rate caused the lowest tidal volume, highest respiratory rate and highest work of breathing; 2) at the other pressurization rates no differences in breathing pattern and work of breathing were observed; and 3) the patient's comfort was worse at the lowest and highest pressurization rates.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Efficacy of automatic continuous positive airway pressure therapy that uses an estimated required pressure in the treatment of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective therapy for the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Automatic CPAP devices continuously adjust the positive pressure to the required levels. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of an automatic CPAP machine used with an estimated reference pressure value. DESIGN: A before-and-after, single-blind trial in which patients were randomly allocated to one of three modes of CPAP administration. SETTING: Referral-based sleep center in a public health care institution. PATIENTS: 36 outpatients with OSAS. INTERVENTION: Continuous positive airway pressure was given at a conventional fixed pressure (group 1), automatic CPAP was given at a measured reference pressure (group 2), and automatic CPAP was given at an estimated reference pressure (group 3). In group 1, the effective pressure was determined during a titration sleep study. In groups 2 and 3, the pressure interval was allowed to vary from 4 cm H2O below reference pressure to 3 cm H2O above reference pressure. In group 3, the estimated value of the reference pressure was determined according to individual anthropometric characteristics. MEASUREMENTS: Sleep studies were performed and measurements of diurnal sleepiness were obtained at each visit. RESULTS: Sleep and breathing disorders and hypersomnolence were alleviated similarly in the three groups. The apnea + hypopnea index remained abnormal in one patient in group 3 for whom the reference pressure had been underestimated. A strong negative correlation was found between the percentage of time spent below reference pressure during CPAP and the difference between the effective and estimated pressures. CONCLUSION: Automatic CPAP can be used with an estimated reference pressure without doing a titration sleep study. The positive pressure trend can be used to determine whether treatment failure is caused by an inadequate pressure setting and to determine the amount of pressure to apply.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Lack of relationship between the true airway pressure and the pressure displayed with an infant ventilator.

OBJECTIVE: To establish if the pressure indicated in the manometer of an infant ventilator (IV 100B, Sechrist, Anaheim, CA) reflects the true pressure delivered to the proximal airway during mechanical ventilation in the neonatal ICU. DESIGN: With approval of our Institutional Research Board, data were collected prospectively. Peak inspiratory pressure and end-expiratory pressure were measured at the "Y" piece of the breathing tubing. Pressure readings from the conventional ventilator's manometer were compared with simultaneously obtained measurements using an electronic monitor. SETTING: This study was conducted in a 45-bed neonatal ICU, admitting 700 to 750 newborns per year. PATIENTS: Twelve neonates who required mechanical ventilation were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Specific interventions were not made by study design. Measurements routinely obtained were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five simultaneous measurements of peak inspiratory pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure were compared. Peak inspiratory pressure values were higher with the electronic monitor in 273 (99%) of 275 measurements and the mean of the differences between the electronic monitor and ventilator's manometer was statistically significant (p less than .001). For positive end-expiratory pressure measurements, values indicated by the electronic monitor were lower in 152 (55%) of 275 determinations, equal in 65 (23%), and higher in 58 (21%) determinations. Percent variations between methods ranged from 0% to 140% for peak inspiratory pressures and from 0% to 500% for positive end-expiratory pressure. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that it is impossible to know the true pressure delivered to the proximal airway of a neonate during mechanical ventilation by observing the ventilator pressure manometer. The manometer readings consistently underestimate the true peak inspiratory pressure values and are very unpredictable regarding positive end-expiratory pressure values. These findings support the use of other methods to monitor the proximal airway pressure besides the ventilator's manometer in the neonatal ICU. Furthermore, mean airway pressure should not be calculated from the pressure readings obtained from the tested ventilator's manometer.

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2000

Cerebrovascular tone rather than intracranial pressure determines the effective downstream pressure of the cerebral circulation in the absence of intracranial hypertension.

Cerebral perfusion pressure is commonly calculated from the difference between mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure because intracranial pressure is known to represent the effective downstream pressure of the cerebral circulation. Studies of other organs, however, have shown that effective downstream pressure is determined by a critical closing pressure located at the arteriolar level. This study was designed to investigate the effects of PCO2-induced variations in cerebrovascular tone on the effective downstream pressure of the cerebral circulation. Sixteen patients recovering from head injury were studied. Intracranial pressure was assessed by epidural pressure transducers. Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was monitored by transcranial Doppler sonography. Effective downstream pressure was derived from the zero flow pressure as extrapolated by regression analysis of instantaneous arterial pressure/middle cerebral artery flow velocity relationships. PaCO2 was varied between 30 and 47 mm Hg in randomized sequence. Intracranial pressure decreased from 18.5+/-5.2 mm Hg during hypercapnia to 9.9+/-3.1 mm Hg during hypocapnia. In contrast, effective downstream pressure increased from 13.7+/-9.6 mm Hg to 23.4+/-8.6 mm Hg and exceeded intracranial pressure at hypocapnic PaCO2 levels. Our results demonstrate that, in the absence of intracranial hypertension, intracranial pressure does not necessarily represent the effective downstream pressure of the cerebral circulation. Instead, the tone of cerebral resistance vessels seems to determine effective downstream pressure. This suggests a modified model of the cerebral circulation based on the existence of two Starling resistors in a series connection.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A pilot study of the effect of altering airway pressure on systolic pulse pressure variation in the systemic and pulmonary arterial circulations.

OBJECTIVE: Systolic pressure variation results from cyclical fluctuation in the intra-thoracic pressure associated with mechanical ventilation and has been used as a measure of relative hypovolemia in mechanically ventilated patients. The impact of the magnitude of the tidal volume and airway pressure on systolic pressure variation, however, has not been examined in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Two patients underwent monitoring following elective cardiac surgery. Tidal volume was randomly varied between 3 and 11 mL/kg over a two minute interval, and the corresponding airway pressure was monitored, as were the effects on the systolic pressure variation of the systemic and pulmonary circulations. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between increasing tidal volume and peak airway pressure (p<0.0001). In addition, peak airway pressure strongly correlated with the systolic pressure variation of both the systemic and pulmonary circulations (p<0.0001). The increase in diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure induced by insufflation correlated well with the associated increase in systolic blood pressure (p<0.0001). Similarly, the increase in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) correlated with the associated decrease in systolic blood pressure induced by insufflation (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Systolic pressure variation in the systemic and pulmonary circulations is affected by tidal volume and peak airway pressure. This should be considered when using systolic pressure variation as a marker of intravascular volume status. Our findings regarding the correlations between changes in the pulmonary arterial pressure and the systemic arterial pressure induced by mechanical ventilation are consistent with the proposed physiological mechanisms of systolic pressure variation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2003

Stump/socket pressure profiles of the pressure cast prosthetic socket.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate stump/socket interface pressure in amputees wearing a socket developed by a pressure casting system.Design. Five unilateral transtibial amputees wore a pressure cast socket and walked at a self-selected speed. BACKGROUND: The socket produces equally distributed pressure at the stump/socket interface, deviating from the conventional belief that pressure varies in proportion to the pain threshold of different tissues in the stump. METHODS: The socket was fabricated while the subject placed his stump in a pressure chamber. Pressure was applied while he adopted a normal standing position. A specially built strain gauged type pressure transducer was used for measuring pressure distribution. Pressure and gait parameters were measured simultaneously while the subjects were standing and walking. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The pressure cast technique was able to provide comfortable fitting sockets. A hydrostatic pressure profile was not evident during standing or gait. Results also showed that no standard pressure profile for the pressure cast socket was observed. This was expected as no rectifications were done on the pressure cast socket. Pressure profiles at 10%, 25% and 50% of gait cycle did not correlate with the pressure profiles previously proposed. RELEVANCE: The hydrostatic theory is an attractive concept in socket design as it produces a stump/socket pressure profile that is evenly distributed. Furthermore, it is a method that is easily implemented, independent of a prosthetist's skill and experience and reduces manufacturing time. However, there is still controversy surrounding the efficacy of this hydrostatic theory.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Recent advances in blood pressure measurement technology: normalized blood pressure measurement with a double-cuff sphygmotonometer.

BACKGROUND: In our previous studies of 24-h blood pressure measurement, basal blood pressure (minimum sleep-time blood pressure) showed the strongest correlation with hypertensive target-organ damage. We have currently devised a new accurate method of blood pressure measurement that entails recording casual blood pressure waves by means of a double-cuff sphygmotonometer, and attempted to normalize casual blood pressure to basal blood pressure. METHODS: The double-cuff sphygmotonometer records the arterial pressure wave, from which, using the formula (P0 = phi(-1)(i) x Pi), we attempted a normalization of casual blood pressure (Pi) to values close to those of the basal blood pressure (P0). True basal blood pressure was measured by an indirect ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (TM2425, A&D Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The subjects were 54 normotensive volunteers and 156 out-patients with essential hypertension [63 with World Health Organization (WHO)-II stage and 93 with WHO-I stage, including 47 subjects with white-coat hypertension] not receiving medication. RESULTS: The coefficient of correlation (r) between normalized diastolic blood pressure (Pd0') and true diastolic basal blood pressure (Pd0) was 0.82 (mean difference = 1 +/- 9.8 mmHg), that between normalized systolic blood pressure (Ps0') and true systolic basal blood pressure (Ps0) being 0.78 (1 +/- 13 mmHg) in 210 subjects. When an office mean blood pressure (MBP) of 116 mmHg was taken as the standard for identifying the WHO-I group, the sensitivity was 70% (65/93) and the specificity 67% (42/63), but when an MBP0 [MBP0' = (Ps0'-Pd0')/3 + Pd0'] of 89 mmHg was the standard, the sensitivity was 82% (76/93) and the specificity 90% (57/63), both significantly higher than the corresponding values for office MBP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We devised a new double-cuff sphygmotonometer and normalizing function (phi(-1)) and, using these methods, calculated the normalized blood pressure in hypertensive out-patients, which may make it possible to identify degrees of severity of hypertension in terms of WHO stages.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Office blood pressure measurements overestimate blood pressure control in renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: As hypertension is an important risk factor for renal allograft failure, we aimed to assess blood pressure control in renal transplant patients with deteriorating graft function using different methods of blood pressure measurements. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with a graft survival of >1 year, and with more than a two-fold increase in urinary albumin excretion, and/or an increase in serum creatinine level >20% during the previous 12 months, were included. Office blood pressure and home BP were measured, and ambulatory blood pressures were obtained in all patients. RESULTS: The mean office blood pressure (133.2+/-16.3/81.7+/-9.6 mmHg) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (133.1+/-12.0/79.8+/-8.3 mmHg) were similar. Home blood pressure in the morning (144.2+/-23.3/87.1+/-12.7 mmHg) and evening (143.2+/-20.6/86.4+/-10.3 mmHg) were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure (P<0.001 for both). Only 18% of the patients exhibited a reduction of >or=10% in systolic blood pressure during nighttime while 39% had an overt rise. Adequate blood pressure control was found in 53% of the patients using office blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg), contrasting 29% using home blood pressure (<135/85 mmHg), and 16% using mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (<125/80 mmHg). These findings were substantiated by the use of receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 24-h blood pressure as a standard, home blood pressure was superior to office blood pressure in estimating blood pressure control in renal transplant patients. Nocturnal hypertension, however, was observed frequently, adding important clinical information about blood pressure control in this high-risk population.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Effect of timing and number of baseline blood pressure determinations on postural blood pressure response.

We hypothesized that the blood pressure response to standing may depend on the method of establishing baseline blood pressure. Three hundred elderly subjects previously completed a postural blood pressure protocol with three supine baseline blood pressure readings obtained two minutes apart prior to standing. Comparison of the readings showed a significant drop between the first and the second (P less than .001) but not between the second and third supine systolic blood pressures. The difference between the first supine systolic blood pressure and the one minute standing blood pressure was significantly greater than that between the third supine systolic blood pressure and the one minute standing blood pressure (P less than .001). A second group was prospectively studied to determine whether the change in blood pressure after standing was greater if only a single baseline reading was taken rather than multiple readings, and whether the decline in blood pressure over three readings was related to duration supine or to the number of blood pressures taken. This group also demonstrated a decline in systolic blood pressure with three serial readings. We conclude that supine blood pressure declines significantly between the first and second readings taken two minutes apart and is secondary to the repetition of readings and not the duration supine. However, this change in supine blood pressure does not significantly alter the blood pressure response to standing. Thus, it appears that a single baseline supine blood pressure measurement is adequate for determining the postural blood pressure response, and that pooling of multiple baseline readings may not be appropriate.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Reconstruction of brachial artery pressure from noninvasive finger pressure measurements.

BACKGROUND: Pulse wave distortions, mainly caused by reflections, and pressure gradients, caused by flow in the resistive vascular tree, may cause differences between finger and brachial artery pressures. These differences may limit the use of finger pressure measurements. We investigated whether brachial artery pressure waves could be reconstructed from finger pressure measurements by correcting for the pressure gradient in addition to correction for pulse wave distortion with a previously described filter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Finger artery pressure (with Finapres), intra-arterial brachial artery pressure (BAP), Riva-Rocci/ Korotkoff (RRK), oscillometric, and return-to-flow (RTF) measurements were simultaneously performed in 57 healthy elderly subjects and patients with vascular disease and/or hypertension. A generalized waveform filter was used to correct for pulse wave distortions. Correction equations for the pressure gradient, based on finger pressure, RRK, RTF, or oscillometric measurements, were obtained in 28 randomly selected subjects and tested in 29. Before reconstruction, Finapres underestimated mean and diastolic BAP (finger pressure minus BAP: systolic, -3.2 +/- 16.9 mm Hg; mean, -13.0 +/- 10.5 mm Hg; diastolic, -8.4 +/- 9.0 mm Hg [mean +/- SD]). After filtering, reconstructed BAP waves were similar to actual BAP in shape but not in pressure level. Optimal correction for the pressure gradient with an equation based on RTF measurements reduced the pressure differences to meet American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria (reconstructed finger pressure minus BAP: systolic, 3.7 +/- 7.0 mm Hg; mean, 0.7 +/- 4.6 mm Hg; and diastolic, 1.0 +/- 4.9 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: BAP waves can be reconstructed from noninvasive finger pressure registrations when finger pressure waves are corrected for pulse wave distortion and individual pressure gradients.

Adult↗