Nucleoside triphosphate phosphotransferase. A new enzyme activity of oncogenic and non-oncogenic "budding" viruses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Human papillomaviruses (HPVS) that infect the genital tract can be divided into two groups: high-risk HPV types, such as HPV 16 and HPV 18, are associated with cancer, low-risk HPV types, such as HPV 6, are associated with benign warts. In both high-risk and low-risk HPV types, the papillomavirus E2 protein binds to four sites within the viral long control region (LCR) and regulates viral gene expression. Here, we present the crystal structure of the minimal DNA-binding domain (DBD) from the HPV 6 E2 protein. We show that the HPV 6 E2 DBD is structurally more similar to the HPV 18 and bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) E2 proteins than it is to the HPV 16 E2 protein. Using gel retardation assays, we show that the hierarchy of E2 sites within the HPV 16 and HPV 6 LCRs are different. However, despite these differences in structure and site preference, both the HPV 16 and 6 E2 DBDs recognise an extended version of the consensus E2 binding site derived from studies of the BPV1 E2 protein. In both cases, the preferred binding site is 5'AACCGN(4)CGGTT3', where the additional flanking base-pairs are in bold and N(4) represents a four base-pair central spacer. Both of these HPV proteins bind preferentially to E2 sites that contain an A:T-rich central spacer. We show that the preference for an A:T-rich central spacer is due, at least in part, to the need to adopt a DNA conformation that facilitates protein contacts with the flanking base-pairs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1), a transcriptional activator, and IRF-2, its antagonistic repressor, have been identified as regulators of type I interferon and interferon-inducible genes. The IRF-1 gene is itself interferon-inducible and hence may be one of the target genes critical for interferon action. When the IRF-2 gene was overexpressed in NIH 3T3 cells, the cells became transformed and displayed enhanced tumorigenicity in nude mice. This transformed phenotype was reversed by concomitant overexpression of the IRF-1 gene. Thus, restrained cell growth depends on a balance between these two mutually antagonistic transcription factors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Previous epidemiology studies have shown association between coal burning and human lung cancer. To confirm relationship of coal burning to lung cancer formation and progression the expression of p53 and c-myc in 13 mouse lung cancer induced by coal-burning smoke and 5 mouse lung tissue control was studied by DNA-RNA in situ hybridization (ISH). Nine of 13 specimens showed c-myc overexpression but it occurred only 1 in 9 in the adjacent tissue. There was overexpression of p53 mRNA in all 13 lung cancer and 5 adjacent tissues. None in the controls was expression of p53 and c-myc detected. When compared to controls, there was significant higher expression of c-myc gene (P = 0.002) and p53 gene (P = 0.0001). The results confirm that overexpression of p53 and c-myc are common molecular events of lung cancer by coal-burning smoke and provide further evidence that smoke from coal burning is a causative agent of lung cancer.
OBJECTIVE: A refinement of prognostic variables using traditional pathologic markers integrated with oncogene proteins, enzymes, and hormonal factors may enhance the ability to predict for recurrence or survival in patients with mammary carcinoma. Although various oncogenes and oncogene products have been identified in human breast carcinoma, their relationship to disease outcome remains controversial. METHODS: Using the monoclonal antibodies cS93.1, 9E1.0, F235-1.7.1, and PAb 1801 against each oncogene protein studied, the avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method provided immunohistochemical staining of bound oncogene protein for c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, and p53, respectively. Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 85 breast cancer patients (stages I, IIA, and IIB). Forty patients (47%) had recurrence of disease; 45 remained free of local-regional or distant disease at mean follow-up of 48 months (range 6-180 months). Molecular biological data were merged with clinicopathologic demographics 1) to determine the frequency of single or co-expression of oncogenes in this patient population; 2) to evaluate the value of these molecular protein markers to predict probability of recurrence; and 3) to determine worth of the studied oncogenes to correlate with traditional clinical pathologic parameters and overall survival. RESULTS: In this study, oncogene expression had statistical correlation for recurrence with increasing co-expression: one oncogene 17.2%, two oncogenes 56.3%, three or four oncogenes, 100% (p = 0.001). Increasing oncogene or co-oncogene expression correlated with statistically significant reduction in disease-free and overall survival; with no expression of oncogenes, disease-free survival was 30 (SE +/- 5.7) months and overall survival was 56.4 (SE +/- 4.57) months. With expression of three oncogenes, disease-free survival was 12 (SE +/- 1.23) months (p = 0.0018) and overall survival was 23.4 (SE +/- 3.38) months (p = 0.0025). In univariate Wilcoxon analysis, oncogene expression was the most significant variable to determine survival (p = 0.035); in multivariate analysis, age and oncogene co-expression each emerged as the most significant variables for overall survival. For the proportional hazards regression model, oncogene co-expression was significant (p = 0.0104, risk-ratio 1.914) and correlated with age and tumor size as significant variables. Ha-ras and c-fos both emerged as important individual oncogene proteins to affect survival (p = 0.0925, risk-ratio 3.517 and p = 0.025, risk-ratio 4.214, respectively). The proto-oncogene c-myc and the antitumor suppressor gene p53 did not have significant effects as individual oncogenes to influence survival. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one fifth of the breast cancer patients in this analysis (disease-free and recurrent) expressed only a single oncogene marker (c-fos, c-myc, Ha-ras, or p53); one quarter of patients with recurrent disease expressed only one oncogene protein. Single oncogene expression did not possess independent prognostic significance for prediction of recurrence. Further, p53 mutations did not function as independent correlates for prognosis. The co-expression of the studied proto-oncogenes (c-myc, Ha-ras) and the nuclear transcriptional protein (c-fos) functioned as a strong prognostic correlate for recurrence and survival; the effect of individual oncogenes to predict survival was greatest for Ha-ras and c-fos. Immediate or early co-expression of three oncogene proteins in neoplastic transformation endowed cells of invasive carcinoma with an aggressive phenotype. This aggressive phenotype was evident in a small percentage of the studied population (11%) and predicted adverse disease-free and overall survival. These findings suggest that oncogene co-expression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of this molecular technology into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.
The accumulation of genetic damage in the forms of activated proto-oncogenes and inactivated tumor-suppressor genes is the driving force in the evolution of a normal cell to a malignant cell. For example, both the activation of ras oncogenes and the inactivation of several suppressor genes, including p53, have been observed in the development of human colon and lung tumors. Point mutations in key codons can activate ras proto-oncogenes and inactivate the p53 suppressor gene. Thus, several critical genes for tumorigenesis are potential targets for carcinogens and radiation that can induce point mutations at low doses. The ras proto-oncogenes are targets for many genotoxic carcinogens. Activation of the ras gene is an early event--probably the "initiating" step--in the development of many chemical-induced rodent tumors. ras Oncogenes are observed in more human tumors and at a higher frequency than any other oncogene, and activation of the proto-oncogene may occur at various stages of the carcinogenic process. Numerous proto-oncogenes other than the ras genes have been shown to be activated in human tumors and to a lesser extent in rodent tumors. Mechanisms that induce aberrant expression of proto-oncogenes are gene amplification and chromosomal translocation or gene rearrangement. Amplification of proto-oncogenes and possibly gene overexpression during the absence of gene amplification occur in the development of many human tumors. For a specific tumor type, amplification of any one proto-oncogene may occur at a low frequency, but the frequency of tumors in which at least one proto-oncogene is amplified can be much higher. Proto-oncogene amplification is usually associated with late stages of tumor progression; however, amplified HER2/neu has been observed in early clinical stages of mammary neoplasia. Activation of proto-oncogenes by chromosomal translocation has been detected at a high frequency in several hematopoietic tumors. Non-ras genes have been detected by DNA transfection assays in both human and rodent tumors. For example, ret and trk genes were found to be activated by gene rearrangements in human papillary thyroid carcinomas. Several potentially new types of oncogenes have also been detected by DNA transfection assays. The etiology of the genetic alterations observed in most human tumors is unclear at present. Examples of ras gene activation and those documented for mutations in the p53 gene demonstrate that exogenous conditions can induce oncogenic mutants of normal genes. The genetic alterations observed in most human tumors are probably generated by both spontaneous events and exogenous conditions.
To date more than twenty five different oncogenes have been identified in human neoplasias. One of these oncogenes is trk, a transforming gene originally isolated from a colon carcinoma biopsy by using gene transfer assays. This oncogene encodes a chimeric molecule that contains the 221 amino terminal residues of a non-muscle tropomyosin followed by the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the trk proto-oncogene product, a tyrosine protein kinase receptor. trk oncogenes have also been identified in a significant fraction of thyroid papillary carcinomas. Some of these trk oncogenes contain sequences derived from genes other than tropomyosin. One such gene is tpr, a gene first identified as a component of the human met oncogene. The trk proto-oncogene, non-muscle tropomyosin and tpr map in the long arm of chromosome 1. Therefore, trk oncogenes are likely to result from internal rearrangements or from unequal cross-overs between two chromosome 1s. Recent studies have demonstrated that the product of the trk proto-oncogene, gp140trk, is the functional receptor for nerve growth factor (NGF). NGF elicits the rapid phosphorylation of gp140trk on tyrosine residues. Moreover, addition of NGF to NIH3T3 cells expressing gp140trk induces the transient expression of c-Fos, DNA synthesis and morphologic transformation. Finally, transfection of the trk proto-oncogene into NGF non-responsive PC12 mutant cells restores NGF responsiveness. Two additional genes designated trkB and trkC have recently been isolated in our laboratory. These genes are highly related to the trk proto-oncogene and encode tyrosine protein kinases which serve as functional receptors for the NGF-related neurotrophins brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophic-3 (NT-3), respectively. Whether mutations in these novel members of the trk family of receptor genes are also implicated in human cancer remains to be determined.
Several studies have shown that forced expression of oncogenic H-ras can induce a senescence-like permanent growth arrest in normal cells. Here we report that expression of oncogenic H-ras in human osteosarcoma U2OS cells also resulted in a senescence-like flat and enlarged cell morphology and permanent growth arrest. In contrast to normal human fibroblasts, U2OS cells were arrested independently of the p16 and ARF tumor suppressors. Treatment with a MEK inhibitor or a p38MAPK inhibitor interrupted oncogenic H-ras-induced growth arrest in U2OS cells, suggesting that activation of MAPK pathways is important. To further determine whether this process is unique to oncogenic H-ras signaling, we examined the effect of oncogenic K-ras on normal cells and human osteosarcoma cells. Similar to oncogenic H-ras, oncogenic K-ras also induced senescence in normal fibroblasts, while transforming immortalized mouse fibroblasts. However, in contrast to oncogenic H-ras, oncogenic K-ras failed to induce a permanent growth arrest in osteosarcoma U2OS cells. Additionally, cells transduced with oncogenic K-ras exhibited distinguishable cellular changes compared to those transduced with oncogenic H-ras. In summary, we report for the first time that oncogenic H-ras signaling can trigger a senescence-like growth arrest in tumor cells, independent of the p16 and ARF tumor suppressors. This result suggests that tumor cells may harbor a senescence-like program that can be activated by ras signaling. Moreover, our study uncovered a cell type-dependent differential response to oncogenic K-ras, as compared to oncogenic H-ras.
Oncogenes are identified functionally by their ability to induce neoplastic transformation of susceptible cells. The first oncogenes to be characterized were isolated from acutely transforming retroviruses. Subsequently, it was determined that the retroviral oncogenes were formed from normal, progenitor genes. These cellular homologs of the viral oncogenes are termed proto-oncogenes. The derivation of oncogenes from proto-oncogenes is the consequence of mutations that remove regulatory constraints from the proto-oncogene. The ability of oncogenes to induce transformation implies that proto-oncogenes may function in growth and differentiation pathways in normal cells. Although many proto-oncogenes have been defined, the normal physiological function of most is not known. Studies of proto-oncogene expression during normal gametogenesis have determined that some genes are expressed in a stage-specific manner. The use of germ cells to provide homogeneous and defined normal cell populations facilitates identifying the roles proto-oncogenes have in regulating cell growth and differentiation.
We have determined the prevalence of amplification of c-myc, N-myc, L-myc, H-ras, Ki-ras, and N-ras oncogenes in 23 cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, using Southern hybridization analysis of DNA extracted from the primary tumor tissues. Nick-translated oncogene probes and oncogene inserts labeled to high specific activities were used. We observed a 5- to 10-fold amplification of one or more of c-myc, N-myc, Ki-ras and N-ras oncogenes in 56% of the tumor tissue samples, with these oncogenes not being amplified in the peripheral blood cells of the same patients. L-myc and H-ras were not amplified in any of our samples. The oncogene amplifications seemed to be associated with advanced stages of squamous cell carcinomas, with the ras and myc family oncogenes being amplified in stages 3 and 4. Hybridization with N-myc detected an additional 2.3 kb EcoRI fragment, along with the normal 2.1 kb fragment. Our data also demonstrated amplification of multiple oncogenes in the same tumor tissue sample. About 60% of the samples with amplified oncogenes showed simultaneous amplification of 2 or more oncogenes. The results showing different oncogene amplifications in similar tumors, as well as multiple oncogene amplifications in the same tumor, suggest that these oncogenes may be alternatively or simultaneously activated in oral carcinogenesis.