Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mail Distribution”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

Impediments to recruitment in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: response and resolution.

Eighteen months after the 1980 initiation of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) (a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will involve 90,000 women), the Toronto center experience such severe problems with recruitment that the study as a whole was jeopardized. Impediments to recruitment arose in five areas. The design of the protocol was criticized by some physicians and participants, a problem that could only be met by justifying the design. A second problem was a lack of understanding of the concept of screening and mistaken assumptions about what participation in the NBSS entailed. Thirdly, recruitment problems occurred at a time when the media were focusing much attention on the hazards of low-level ionizing radiation. Fourthly, women were found to have a variety of personal reasons for delaying or avoiding entry into the study. Finally, factors characteristic of the Canadian milieu such as universal health coverage may have acted as a disincentive to entry. To improve physician understanding, NBSS personnel made presentations at medical rounds and scientific meetings; articles were written for medical journals. To win support from the lay public, talks were given to recreation or work-based groups. Appearances on radio and television talk shows were sought out. Mass mailings to university staff and professional associations did not produce large responses, nor did advertisements on television, radio, or in newspapers. The distribution of a check insert in a government mailing gave rise to hundreds of appointments across Canada. However, for generating an ongoing adequate level of recruitment, the best measure has been the mailing of personally addressed letters to eligible women followed by a telephone call. Data on response rates, cost and women's attitudes toward the study are reported. By early 1983, Toronto met its recruitment target of 12,000.

Adult↗

Evaluation of general practice care by chronically ill patients: effect of the method of administration.

BACKGROUND: Although the patient survey has become a popular method for learning about patients' views and experiences, little attention has been paid to the validity and feasibility of different survey methods. OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to compare handing out written questionnaires to chronically ill patients who consecutively visited the general practice with mailing questionnaires to chronically ill patients who were sampled from the patient register. METHOD: Patient surveys were performed in eight general practices in The Netherlands, applying both methods of administering the questionnaire to patients in each practice (n = 345). RESULTS: The response rate was 63% in the mail survey and 72% in the hand-distributed survey. The sample composition was almost equal, except that patients in the hand-distributed survey more often reported having 'a different chronic disease.' The item-response for each aspect of care was similar in both methods of administration. CONCLUSION: Patients in the mail survey tended to use the extreme categories on the scale for certain aspects of care more often than patients in the hand-distributed survey, but the overall trend was not significant.

Adolescent↗

Organization of orthopaedic trauma services: a survey of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to collect information about the organization of orthopaedic trauma services in different types of hospitals, with particular emphasis on hospital support arrangements in different practice situations. DESIGN: A survey was sent to all members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) as part of the organization's newsletter. Fractoids. In addition, the survey was distributed by the OTA's E-mail discussion list, ORT-1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The survey included questions about the size and nature of the hospital, resident involvement, academic affiliation, number of orthopaedic physician staff, training of the staff, presence of an organized orthopaedic trauma service, distribution of call and patients, and hospital support. RESULTS: Fifty-seven responses were received from North American centers, of which six were duplications. Responses came from institutions of all types and sizes, although most came from urban, Level 1 trauma centers with academic affiliation. Twenty-nine hospitals had a designated orthopaedic trauma service, and twenty-six had a director. Eighteen institutions had ancillary staff (nurses, physician's assistants, etc.) assigned to the orthopaedic trauma service. Hospitals with an academic affiliation were statistically more likely to have a designated orthopaedic trauma service and to distribute trauma patients by subspecialty expertise. In hospitals with a designated orthopaedic trauma service or director, it was more common to have ancillary support staff and to have it funded by the hospital, although the differences did not rise to statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in organization of orthopaedic trauma care between hospitals, which may be related to hospital size, academic affiliation, and orthopaedic department organization. Further study is necessary to determine whether organizational differences translate into differences in patient outcome after trauma.

Benchmarking↗

Social equity and access to the World Wide Web and E-mail: implications for design and implementation of medical applications.

INTRODUCTION: The distribution and types of Internet connectivity will determine the equity of access by patient populations to emerging health technologies. We sought to measure the rates, types, and predictors of access in a patient population targeted for Web-based medical services. METHODS: Design. Cross sectional in-person interview. Setting. Emergency department of a large urban pediatric teaching hospital. Subjects. Primary caretakers of patients or patients at least 16 years old. Procedure and measures. Subjects were asked about access to e-mail and the Internet as well as about willingness to use and concerns about Web-based services. Views of equity and access and sociodemographic data were also elicited. RESULTS: 132 subjects were enrolled in the study. Of respondents, 67.2% use a computer and 36.4% can access the Internet or e-mail from home. Including Internet connections and/or e-mail accounts at work, school and public libraries, 50.7% of the sample has access. Forty percent of families have e-mail accounts. The rate at which families have connectivity is primarily correlated with income (r = 0.6, p < 0.01). At all income levels, rates of access to the World Wide Web are higher than to e-mail. White patients are much more likely to have e-mail (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.4-10.8) and Web access (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.7-7.5). CONCLUSIONS: Connectivity is directly correlated with income and distributed unevenly across racial and ethnic groups. World Wide Web access is more prevalent than e-mail accounts, and both are often obtained outside the home. Design of health applications should account for these attributes of patient access.

Caregivers↗

The BrainIT group: concept and core dataset definition.

INTRODUCTION: An open collaborative international network has been established which aims to improve inter-centre standards for collection of high-resolution, neurointensive care data on patients with traumatic brain injury. The group is also working towards the creation of an open access, detailed and validated database that will be useful for post-hoc hypothesis testing. In Part A, the underlying concept, the group coordination structure, membership guidelines and database access and publication criteria are described. Secondly, in part B, we describe a set of meetings funded by the EEC that allowed us to define a "Core Dataset" and we present the results of a feasibility exercise for collection of this core dataset. METHODS: Four group meetings funded by the EEC have enabled definition of a "Core Dataset" to be collected from all centres regardless of specific project aim. A paper based pilot collection of data was conducted to determine the feasibility for collection of the core dataset. Specially designed forms to collect the core dataset demographic and clinical information as well as sample the time-series data elements were distributed by both email and standard mail to 22 BrainIT centres. A deadline of two months was set to receive completed forms back from centres. A pilot data collection of minute by minute physiological monitoring data was also performed. FINDINGS: A core-dataset was defined and can be downloaded from the BrainIT web-site (go to "Core dataset" link at: www.brainit.org). Eighteen centres (82%) returned completed forms by the set deadline. Overall the feasibility for collection of the core data elements was high with only 10 of the 64 questions (16%) showing missing data. Of those 10 fields with missing data, the average number of centres not responding was 12% and the median 6%. An SQL database to hold the data has been designed and is being tested. Software tools for collection of the core dataset have been developed. Ethics approval has been granted for collection of multi-centre data as part of a pilot data collection study. INTERPRETATION: The BrainIT network provides a more standardised and higher resolution data collection mechanism for research groups, organisations and the device industry to conduct multi-centre trials of new health care technology in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Brain Injuries↗

A critical analysis of the largest reported mass fecal occult blood screening program in the United States.

Fecal occult blood testing for the detection of colon cancer remains controversial. We performed a mass screening program from January 24, 1988, to February 19, 1988, with intensive media promotion, including 121 minutes of televised air time. A total of 5,000 primary practitioners were notified by mail. Hemoccult-II tests were distributed to 156,000 individuals; 55,051 (35%) were returned. Ninety-five percent of the respondents were informed of the program by television. A total of 3,375 persons (6%) tested positive for fecal occult blood; of these, 2,469 (73%) informed the center that they saw their physician to initiate a work-up. Information from physicians regarding work-ups was returned on only 1,356 (55%) patients. Diagnostic tests numbered 2,227 (1.6 tests per patient). However, 5% had no testing, 16% had a repeat Hemoccult only, and 35% had neither a barium enema nor colonoscopy performed. Thirty-six colorectal cancers and 212 polyps were identified. The predictive value (i.e., number of cancers per number of patients who tested positive) increased directly by decade. Thirty-three of 36 patients (92%) with cancer underwent either a barium enema or colonoscopy versus only 185 of 438 (42%) patients with a "negative" work-up. Cancers found were carcinoma in situ in 10 patients (29%), Dukes A in 12 (35%), Dukes B in 4 (12%), and Dukes C in 8 (24%); distant metastases were not found in any participant. Thirty-six percent of the tumors were located in either the right or transverse colon. We conclude that: (1) Screening identified early cancers. All were potentially curable and 64% were limited to the bowel wall. (2) Massive Hemoccult distribution was possible over a short interval, but patient and physician compliance was disturbingly low. (3) Total colonic evaluation is mandatory, since at least 36% of tumors were beyond the reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope. (4) Many work-ups were unnecessary (repeat Hemoccults) or inadequate, indicating a need for physician education.

Adult↗

Decreased prevalence of asthma among farm-reared children compared with those who are rural but not farm-reared.

BACKGROUND: Farm exposure has been associated with decreased asthma prevalence. OBJECTIVES: We compared asthma prevalence among rural farm-reared and non-farm-reared children and examined farm demographic and environmental factors. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, population-based survey among 36,500 rural kindergarten through 12th grade school children. Surveys were distributed through schools and returned by mail. RESULTS: Of the 4152 participants, 18% had lived or were currently living on a farm. Compared to other rural children, farm children had more siblings (3.0 vs 2.5; P < .015), were more likely to be breast-fed (64% vs 58%; P < .002), to have pets (88% vs 79%; P < .001), and were less likely to have attended daycare (39% vs 50%; P < .001). Farm-reared children were less likely to have had a history of wheezing (28% vs 34%; P < .003) or a diagnosis of asthma (22% vs 26%; P < .002). This effect was greater among children younger than 10 years of age than among older children. There was no difference in the frequency of either asthma or non-asthma allergy symptoms during the previous 12 months. When analyzed by age and sex, decreased asthma prevalence was associated with farm rearing among younger children more than among adolescents. Farm residence beginning during the first 5 years, but not later, was associated with decreased rates of ever asthma (23.7% vs 33.7%; P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma, but not other manifestations of allergy, is less commonly reported among farm-reared children. Early exposures may be more important than those occurring later. Without ongoing exposures, their effects on disease expression may diminish over time.

Agriculture↗

A comparison of observed and self-reported compliance with universal precautions among emergency department personnel at a Minnesota public teaching hospital: implications for assessing infection control programs.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the level of universal precautions compliance in a hospital emergency department by two methods (direct observation of subjects versus self-reporting by questionnaire). SETTING: A Level II trauma center located within a university-affiliated medical center in Minneapolis/St Paul, Minnesota. Glove and needle disposal containers were available in each treatment room; gowns, masks, and goggles were readily available. PARTICIPANTS: ED physicians (12 staff plus rotating residents), medical students, nursing staff, and ancillary personnel. METHODS: Ten observers documented six specific behaviors among ED personnel: needle recap frequency, needle recap techniques, and use of gowns, gloves, masks, and goggles. After the observations, surveys were distributed to ED personnel by intrahospital mail in Fall 1989. RESULTS: During 270 observation hours, 1,018 patient-worker interactions were recorded. Gloves were the barrier worn most frequently when appropriate (74%), followed by goggles (13%), gowns (12%), and masks (1%). Needles were recapped 51% of the time, and most needles that were recapped (79%) were recapped by the two-hand technique; 5% of all needles used were left uncapped at bedside or in the trash. Physicians were observed to use gloves more frequently than registered nurses and nursing assistants; nurses were observed to recap more frequently than physicians. From the survey, the three most common reasons for noncompliance involved time (71%), dexterity (61%), and patient appearance (50%). CONCLUSION: Universal precautions are not consistently used by ED personnel, and ED personnel significantly overestimate their compliance with universal precautions.

Data Collection↗

Nursing wound care survey: sterile and nonsterile glove choice.

PURPOSE: The application of sterile and clean procedure to the practice of wound care nursing was examined. DESIGN: This prospective, descriptive study surveyed staff nurses regarding glove use. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Seven hundred forty-three staff nurses from five health care agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area responded to the survey. INSTRUMENTS: A self-report wound care survey instrument was developed by Nursing Consortium for Research and Practice members from information adapted from the wound care literature. The questionnaire comprised 31 questions and required approximately 10 minutes to complete. METHODS: Nursing Consortium for Research and Practice members obtained approval from their respective institutional human subjects committees and distributed questionnaires among all nurses engaged in direct care. Some agency representatives personally handed the survey instruments to subjects, but most distributed them through their agencies personnel mailing systems. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-three (38%) of 1900 questionnaires were completed and returned to the five site coordinators. Differences were found between acute care and home health nurses. Acute care nurses were more likely than home care nurses to use sterile gloves in all wound care situations. CONCLUSION: Greater variation was found with regard to sterile technique in wound care practice than in previously reported studies. Although patient risk factors and wound type significantly influenced the choice of sterile or clean gloves, additional environmental and personal factors exerted considerable influence. These included health care setting, degree of professional education, and nurses' experiential background. Attempts to modify practice through policy change alone may not be sufficient to overcome resistance to change. Instead, it may be necessary for nurses to "unlearn" lessons from basic nursing education before they can adopt to new practices and clinical policies.

Adult↗

A survey of antibiotic prescribing and knowledge of penicillin allergy.

BACKGROUND: Cephalosporins can cause allergic reactions in patients with penicillin (PCN) allergy. Physicians' prescribing habits for patients with PCN allergy can vary. OBJECTIVES: 1) Survey community and academic physicians, students, residents, and allergists on their tendencies to prescribe cephalosporins and/or perform PCN skin testing in patients with different histories of PCN allergy. 2) Evaluate PCN allergy knowledge in these groups. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of four case scenarios and five true/false questions on PCN allergy was distributed at various conferences and by mailings. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-eight completed surveys were analyzed. Given a patient with a history of rash with PCN, an equal number of allergists and nonallergists (36%) prescribed cephalosporins, although there was a difference between pediatricians (56%) and internists (22%). Given a history of PCN anaphylaxis, no allergists but 11% of nonallergists prescribed a cephalosporin. Skin testing was infrequently requested by nonallergists. The correct response rate for the true/false questions was 89% for allergists, community (63%) and academic (67%) physicians, pediatricians (61%), internists (67%), residents (68%), and students (68%). Pediatric residents had the highest (74%) and community pediatricians the lowest (59%) correct response rate. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in prescribing cephalosporins and in requesting PCN skin testing in patients with varied histories of PCN allergy. The survey results indicate a need for increased PCN allergy education.

Cephalosporins↗

Virtual slides: high-quality demand, physical limitations, and affordability.

Virtual slides (VSs) have been around since the beginning of telepathology. As recently as a couple of years ago, only single small images could be acquired, and their distribution was limited to e-mail at best. Today, whole slides can be acquired, covering an area up to 100,000 times larger than that possible only a few years ago. Moreover, advanced Internet and world-wide web technologies enable delivery of those images to a broad audience. Despite considerable advances in technology, few good examples of VSs for public use can be found on the web. One of the reasons for this is a lack of sophisticated and integrated commercial solutions covering the needs from acquisition to delivery at reasonable cost. This article describes physical and technical limitations of the VS technology to clarify the demands on a VS acquisition system. A new type of web-based VS viewer (vMic; http://alf3.urz.unibas.ch/vmic/) open to public use is introduced, allowing anyone to set up a VS system with high usability at low cost.

Humans↗

Medical schools' attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of central institutional review boards.

PURPOSE: To investigate the current practices, attitudes, perceptions, and future plans of U.S. medical schools regarding the use of central institutional review boards (IRBs) to review research involving human participants. METHOD: In 2003, a survey instrument was distributed via fax and e-mail to the deans of research at the 125 accredited U.S. medical schools. Each dean was asked to have the instrument completed by the official at that school who decided on the use of a central versus local IRB. The survey instrument consisted primarily of a variety of closed-ended questions. RESULTS: Eighty-eight medical schools (69.8%) completed the instrument; 76% of these indicated that they had never used a central IRB and 24% had used a central IRB. Most of the respondents expressed no interest in using a central IRB in the future because they believed that their local IRB was working efficiently, and they were concerned about issues of institutional liability and the loss of local representation in the review process. Of the medical schools that had used a central IRB, most were pleased with the performance of the central IRB and would continue to use a central IRB in the future. Of interest, most of these respondents did not agree that a central IRB had helped them to attract industry-sponsored research. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of much discussion about the advantages of central IRBs in expediting overview of human subjects research, especially in multicenter trials, the majority of medical schools surveyed had never used a central IRB and expressed no interest in doing so.

Attitude↗

Chronic pain among children and adolescents: physician consultation and medication use.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess physician consultation and use of medication in Dutch children and adolescents (0-18 years old) having chronic pain in relation to sociodemographic factors and pain characteristics. DESIGN: This was a population-based cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire was either mailed to the participants' parents or distributed at school, and it was filled out by the parents (for children aged 0-7 years) or by the participant (for children and adolescents aged 8-18 years). SETTING: The study was conducted in the Rotterdam area. PATIENTS: Participants included a random sample of 1,300 children aged 0 to 3 years taken from the register of population. In addition, 41 schools were selected to obtain a representative sample of 5,336 children and adolescents aged 4 to 18 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reported physician consultation and medication use were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 6,636 children and adolescents surveyed, 5,424 (82%) responded. A total of 1,358 respondents (25%) reported chronic pain. Of these, 57% had consulted a physician and 39% had used medication for the pain. Respondents with earache, more intense pain, and more frequent pain and those attending lower vocational training programs were more likely to consult a physician for the pain than the average respondent. Respondents with earache, sore throat, headache, more intense pain, and multiple pain; children aged 0 to 3 years; and girls were more likely to use medication for the pain. Logistic regression analyses showed that for physician consultation, the most significant predictive factors were the intensity of pain, age, and earache as well as the level of education for respondents aged 12 to 16 years. The use of medication was predicted by earache, headache, limb pain, intensity of pain, and age. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is a common complaint in children and adolescents, frequently resulting in consultation of a physician and medication use. Regarding physician consultation, children and adolescents with a lower educational level seem to be a group at risk.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of three visit-specific patient satisfaction instruments: reliability and validity measures and the effect of four methods of data collection on dimensions of patient satisfaction.

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the reliability and validity of three short-form patient satisfaction instruments and to examine the effects of data collection methods on patient satisfaction ratings. With a framework to assess quality of care from the patient's perspective, acceptability, accessibility, patient satisfaction rating, provider recommendation, and patient demographic data were collected using three patient surveys: the Health Outcomes Institute questionnaire (HOI); the Nalle Clinic survey (Nalle); and a commercially marketed survey (COM). The four methods of data collection were (1) receptionist-distributed at check-in, (2) student-distributed at check-out, (3) mail, and (4) phone. Data were collected on a systematically selected sample of 1,840 patients who were appointed in two family practice departments of the Nalle Clinic in Charlotte, North Carolina. From the 925 completed surveys, the results indicated that the HOI instrument scored higher on the reliability and validity measures in this patient sample than the Nalle or COM surveys. Analysis of variance was then conducted on the HOI scores across the four methods of data collection. The conclusion was that the method of data collection did not significantly influence any of the patient satisfaction indicators in the family practice sample.

Data Collection↗

An international survey of nurse editors' roles and practices.

PURPOSE: To describe the editorial practices of nurse editors, including proprietary arrangements, manuscript processing systems, and editorial review, and to ascertain editors' opinions on effective editorial practices. DESIGN: A descriptive study in which an author-designed 108-question survey was distributed and collected by e-mail. Of 177 international nursing editors identified, 164 e-mail addresses could be located, and 137 nurse editors expressed willingness to participate. Ninety journals were represented in the final purposive convenience sample, including 71 published in the US and 19 outside the US. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t test, chi square, and content analysis. FINDINGS: Of the 90 journals, 78 were characterized by their editors as scholarly journals. Fifty-two were official journals of associations. The nurse editors' average age was 53, with over 20 years of experience in nursing and 8 years as editor. Although practices and compensation at U.S. and international journals did not differ significantly, scholarly journals and "other" publications such as magazines and newsletters were managed differently. Blinded peer review was in place at 98% of journals. Editors generally used manuscript reviewers as advisors rather than as voters; only 30% of editors thought their ultimate decision must agree with the majority of reviewers. Nurse editors often needed 3-5 years to feel comfortable in the role. Editors of association journals often reported struggling with the issue of editorial independence versus association control. Editors believed their role was influential in maintaining scholarly excellence and evidence-based practice, but many noted the constant pressure of deadlines and dealing with poor writing from authors as challenges of the work. CONCLUSIONS: The role of nurse editor is not part of the formal preparation of nurse scholars or clinicians; standards for nurse editors are not readily apparent, and nurse editors often work in isolation, lacking professional support. This survey included data by which nurse authors and readers of nursing journals can understand how nurse editors work and make decisions about manuscripts, ultimately influencing knowledge dissemination in nursing journals. Nurse editors can use this information to compare their practices with that of others, and advocate for adequate preparation, compensation, and assistance with production.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Health workers and AIDS: knowledge, attitudes and experiences as determinants of anxiety.

The objective of the study was to measure the level of HIV/AIDS related anxiety among health care workers and identify its determinants. Data were obtained by means of a mailed, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire distributed to 2561 Danish medical doctors, nurses and nursing aides drawn randomly from the lists of members of the respective national associations. The data were analysed on the basis of a pre-study model including 12 variables hypothesizing a hierarchy of causal dependencies with anxiety at the top. 44% of the participants expressed HIV/AIDS related anxiety--hospital workers more than primary care workers, the older less than the younger. Anxiety was significantly associated with negative/restrictive attitudes towards HIV positives and gay men and with low levels of knowledge about HIV transmission and less education about HIV/AIDS. Negative/restrictive attitudes towards HIV positives were associated both with less knowledge regarding HIV transmission and fewer contacts with HIV positives. Similar associations were found regarding gay men. It is suggested that new kinds of training programmes be established which focus much more on attitudes and norms concerning HIV/AIDS--especially among health care workers with only occasional contact with HIV patients.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Analysis of a study of the users, uses, and future agenda of the UMLS.

OBJECTIVES: The UMLS constitutes the largest existing collection of medical terms. However, little has been published about the users and uses of the UMLS. This study sheds light on these issues. DESIGN: We designed a questionnaire consisting of 26 questions and distributed it to the UMLS user mailing list. Participants were assured complete confidentiality of their replies. To further encourage list members to respond, we promised to provide them with early results prior to publication. Sector analysis of the responses, according to employment organizations is used to obtain insights into some responses. RESULTS: We received 70 responses. The study confirms two intended uses of the UMLS: access to source terminologies (75%), and mapping among them (44%). However, most access is just to a few sources, led by SNOMED, MeSH, and ICD. Out of 119 reported purposes of use, terminology research (37), information retrieval (19), and terminology translation (14) lead. Four important observations are that the UMLS is widely used as a terminology (77%), even though it was not designed as one; many users (73%) want the NLM to mark concepts with multiple parents in an indented hierarchy and to derive a terminology from the UMLS (73%). Finally, auditing the UMLS is a top budget priority (35%) for users. CONCLUSIONS: The study reports many uses of the UMLS in a variety of subjects from terminology research to decision support and phenotyping. The study confirms that the UMLS is used to access its source terminologies and to map among them. Two primary concerns of the existing user base are auditing the UMLS and the design of a UMLS-based derived terminology.

Consumer Behavior↗

Marijuana as an antiemetic drug: how useful is it today? Opinions from clinical oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the antiemetic drug preferences of practicing adult oncologists and to estimate the frequency of use of marijuana smoke as an antiemetic agent. DESIGN: Identical mailed questionnaire surveys on antiemetic preferences, distributed prior to approval of ondansetron. SAMPLE: Two groups of practicing clinical adult oncologists were surveyed. The first group (N = 120) consisted of every twentieth board-certified, American member of the American Society of Clinic Oncology culled from the 1990 ASCO membership directory in alphabetical order. The second group (N = 60) consisted of every adult clinical oncologist in metropolitan Washington, D.C. MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 141 (78%) physicians; the responses from both groups were almost identical (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). Marijuana (either as marijuana smoke or oral tetrahydrocannabinol) ranked ninth in order of preference for the treatment of mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, and sixth for the treatment of more severe symptoms induced by chemotherapy. Most (94 or 65%) respondents reported having prescribed marijuana or oral THC 10 times or less; only 5 (3.5%) had prescribed such drugs more than 100 times which represented for them about 1% of their average lifetime clinical patient load. The respondents who had prescribed marijuana in any form thought that it had effectively relieved post-chemotherapy nausea or vomiting in 50% of patients. Unpleasant adverse effects were estimated to have occurred in 25% of treated patients. Only 8 (6%) respondents indicated that they would prescribe marijuana much more frequently--if there were no legal barriers associated with its medical use. CONCLUSION: Marijuana in any form was believed to be efficacious for 50% of patients with pre- or post-chemotherapy nausea or vomiting. However, one of four patients who received it complained of bothersome adverse effects. At the time of the study, cannabis was prescribed or recommended relatively infrequently by American clinical oncologists (i.e., those who actually prescribed chemotherapy). Even if it was freely available and restrictions on its use liberalized, smokeable marijuana, according to responses given on this survey, would not be used much more frequently by American oncologists.

Administration, Oral↗