Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HAND AND FOOT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

[Outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in a day-nursery. A new clinical form? (author's transl)].

Ten cases of vesicular eruption affecting primarily the hands (4/10) and feet (6/10) occurred in a day-nursery for infants. An enterovirus related to coxsackie A 16 virus was isolated from two vesicular fluids and nine stools. The fact that the outbreak took place in the winter, the rarity of pharyngeal lesions (2/10), the high incidence of foot lesions and the presence of listlessness as only associated symptom lead to a discussion of the relationship between this small epidemic and true hand, foot and mouth disease.

Child, Preschool↗

Clinical and epidemiological findings in patients with central ray deficiency: split hand foot malformation (SHFM) in Manitoba, Canada.

We conducted a clinical population study to examine the incidence and epidemiology of split hand foot-malformation (SHFM) in Manitoba from 1957 to 2003. The total number of births during this period was 850,742. Forty-three patients with SHFM were identified, resulting in an incidence of 1 in 19,784 births. Most patients were ascertained through referrals to the Section of Genetics and Metabolism at the Children's Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Overall, 22 (51.2%) of affected individuals were females and 21 (48.8%) were male. The left upper limb (LUL) was the most frequently affected, (in 46.5% of patients). The right hand was involved in 39.5%. In 4 patients (9.3%) all four limbs were affected. SHFM is classified as a failure of formation of parts according to the International Federation of Surgical Societies of the Hand (IFSSH) and has also been categorized as Typical or Atypical. Individuals in the Manitoba cohort were classified into two main categories: Typical (29 cases) and Atypical (3 cases). However, 11 patients were not easily placed into either group and comprised a distinct category termed "difficult to classify." Patients in the three groups were then further subdivided depending on whether or not they had additional congenital anomalies. These complex patients included those with single gene disorders in which SHFM has been reported (e.g., ectodermal dysplasia Ectrodactyly Clefting (EEC), tibial aplasia with SHFM, fibular aplasia with SHFM), as well as those with other recognized or unknown patterns of anomalies. Two had deletions involving 9q and 5p respectively. Unlike some other studies, we did not find an excess of males or right-sided defects and only two of the cases--two sisters--were related.

Cohort Studies↗

[Epidemica of hand-foot and mouth disease].

After describing the affections caused by the virus Coxsackie, the characteristics of disease in mouth-hands-feet are looked over reporting the principal epidemic outbreak as well as the isolated forms of exhibition. The illness can be shown in a complete, incomplete or moderate way. This outbreak occurred in Mendoza (Argentina) in 1975-1976: 25 school aged children were controlled and no other relatives of different ages fell ill. No predisposition for either sex. They didn't come from the same school. A sudden eclosion and without general display. In some of them the buccal were absent. All of them had palm and sole lesions and only four of them had buttock lesions. Everybody recovered after a short eruptive period and without any complications.

Argentina↗