Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Furaldehyde”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture.

Furfural was reduced to furfuryl alcohol by Saccaromyces cerevisiae with a yield of 0.97 +/- 0.01 mmol/ mmol causing a lag phase in cell growth. In the presence of 29 mM, furfural the cell-mass yield on glucose decreased from 11.0 +/- 0.1 mg/mmol (0.06 +/- 0.0006 g/g) in a reference fermentation without furfural to 9.7 +/- 0.07 mg/ mmol (0.05 +/- 0.0004 g/g), whereas the ethanol yield on glucose increased from 1.6 +/- 0.03 to 1.7 +/- 0.03 mmol/mmol. No glycerol was excreted during furfural reduction, and the lag phase in acetate production was extended from 1 h in the reference fermentation to 5 h in the presence of furfural. Acetaldehyde and pyruvate were excreted during the furfural reduction phase. Cell growth and cell maintenance were proportional to glucose consumption during the entire fermentation, whereas the cell-mass yield on ATP produced was low during furfural reduction. These observations indicate that furfural addition to a batch culture decreased cell replication without inhibiting cell activity (designated as replicative inactivation). The absence of glycerol production during furfural reduction suggests that furfural acted as an alternative redox sink oxidizing excess NADH formed in biosynthesis. A mechanistic mathematical model was developed that described accurately the fermentation in the absence and presence of furfural. The model was based on the assumptions that: (i) furfural reduction to furfuryl alcohol by NADH-dependent dehydrogenases had a higher priority than reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glycerol; and (ii) furfural caused inactivation of cell replication. The effect of furfural on cell replication is discussed in relation to acetaldehyde formation. Inactivation of cell replication was modeled by considering two populations within the cell culture, both metabolically active, but only one replicating. The kinetic description was developed as a tool to estimate transient fluxes of carbon, NADH/NAD+ and ATP/ADP.

Anaerobiosis↗
PubMed1999

Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts.

The influence of the factors acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on the ethanol yield (YEtOH) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bakers' yeast, S. cerevisiae ATCC 96581, and Candida shehatae NJ 23 was investigated using a 2(3)-full factorial design with 3 centrepoints. The results indicated that acetic acid inhibited the fermentation by C. shehatae NJ 23 markedly more than by bakers' yeast, whereas no significant difference in tolerance towards the compounds was detected between the S. cerevisiae strains. Furfural (2 g L-1) and the lignin derived compound p-hydroxybenzoic acid (2 g L-1) did not affect any of the yeasts at the cell mass concentration used. The results indicated that the linear model was not adequate to describe the experimental data (the p-values of curvatures were 0.048 for NJ 23 and 0.091 for bakers' yeast). Based on the results from the 2(3)-full factorial experiment, an extended experiment was designed based on a central composite design to investigate the influence of the factors on the specific growth rate (mu), biomass yield (Yx), volumetric ethanol productivity (QEtOH), and YEtOH. Bakers' yeast was chosen in the extended experiment due to its better tolerance towards acetic acid, which makes it a more interesting organism for use in industrial fermentations of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. The inoculum size was reduced in the extended experiment to reduce any increase in inhibitor tolerance that might be due to a large cell inoculum. By dividing the experiment in blocks containing fermentations performed with the same inoculum preparation on the same day, much of the anticipated systematic variation between the experiments was separated from the experimental error. The results of the fitted model can be summarised as follows: mu was decreased by furfural (0-3 g L-1). Furfural and acetic acid (0-10 g L-1) also interacted negatively on mu. Furfural concentrations up to 2 g L-1 stimulated Yx in the absence of acetic acid whereas higher concentrations decreased Yx. The two compounds interacted negatively on Yx and YEtOH. Acetic acid concentrations up to 9 g L-1 stimulated QEtOH, whereas furfural (0-3 g L-1) decreased QEtOH. Acetic acid in concentrations up to 10 g L-1 stimulated YEtOH in the absence of furfural, and furfural (0-2 g L-1) slightly increased YEtOH in the absence of acetic acid whereas higher concentrations caused inhibition. Acetic acid and furfural interacted negatively on YEtOH.

Acetic Acid↗