SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “External validity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia mediated by ryanodine receptor 2: a validated risk stratification.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events (AEs) even while treated with β-blockers. The aim was to develop a model for individualized prediction of AEs in patients with RYR2-mediated CPVT on β-blocker monotherapy. METHODS: The derivation and independent validation cohorts included 743 and 129 patients, respectively. AEs were defined as arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), and sudden cardiac death. Near-fatal or fatal AEs (nf/fAEs) included all AEs except for arrhythmic syncope. Prediction models using Cox regression were developed and internally and externally validated. RESULTS: A total of 102 (13.7%) patients in the derivation cohort and 24 (18.6%) patients in the validation cohort experienced ≥1 AE over a median follow-up of 5.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.7] and 2.4 (IQR, 4.4) years, respectively. Predictors of AE were arrhythmic syncope or SCA prior to diagnosis and age at β-blocker initiation. In the derivation and validation cohorts, the optimism-corrected C-indices of the models for AE were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.72] and 0.59 (95% CI 0.48-0.71), respectively. For nf/fAEs, ventricular arrhythmia severity before β-blocker initiation was a fourth independent predictor, and C-indices of the models in the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.72), respectively. In the derivation cohort, calibration slopes were 1.00 (95% CI 0.59-1.41) for AE and 1.00 (95% CI 0.69-1.32) for nf/fAE. CONCLUSIONS: These externally validated risk prediction models using clinical parameters accurately distinguished CPVT patients on β-blocker monotherapy at low and high risk for future AEs while treated with β-blockers. These models provide guidance for implementation of clinical management therapies to prevent AEs in patients with CPVT.

Humans↗

PubMed1998

Die Vision einer pragmatischen klinischen Forschung oder das Ende der Diskussion über < > und < >

The Concept of Pragmatic Clinical Research or the End of Discussion about 'Placebo' and 'Specific Effects&rsquoThe reorientation of clinical research towards the questions of treatment benefit (beyond the question of treatment efficacy) and of how much clinical trials represent actual practice (external validity) is the timely path to clinical research questions of real interest and importance. Postmodern 'anything goes' makes it possible to also consider thus far looked down on placebo effects as valuable, however, it requires the precise documentation of the external validity of such effects. Not disease as such, but the disease context, not therapy as such, but the therapy context, not the patient as such, but the patient context, not a test as such, but the test situation have become the important focuses of clinical research. In respect to test results current medicine has to recognize its illiterate mystification of allegedly 'objective' and 'hard' data. The patient context can determine whether an 'efficacious' therapy is beneficial or harmful, and thus, it is the proper definition of the patient context which makes medicine scientific, no matter how 'objective' or 'subjective' the effect of therapy is. The consideration of the therapy context leads to the important distinction between efficacy and effectiveness (or benefit), and it becomes intelligible that the randomised controlled trial in its traditional design as the placebo-controlled double-blind trial is limited to the evaluation of an agent theory. The evaluation of treatment effectiveness requires more pragmatic trials which study treatment operations and not isolated components and which may even compare entire treatment strategies. Pragmatic clinical trials, in future, will not only allow the study of 'pathogenesis blockers'., but also the study of 'salutogenetic' interventions working with the formation of the host. The focus of attention and research in the new school of evidencebased medicine with clinical epidemiology as its basic science (if not superficially understood as mere literature medicine) has long ago been identified as illness as the product of host, disease and environment. The dispute about 'placebo' and 'specific effects', in the meantime, has become obsolete.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1989

Meaning in life depth in the active married elderly.

To discover if elderly people have developed a deeper meaning in life than younger individuals, a sample of active married elderly people was compared to a group of younger adults. Two dimensions of meaning in life depth were investigated. The first was a self-suitability measure indicating comfort with one's own meaning, measured by Crumbaugh and Maholick's (1969) Purpose in Life Test. The second was an external validation measure derived from a statement about their own strongest meaning in life, written by the participants and rated for depth by two outside judges. The older group scored significantly higher than the younger adults on the self-suitability measure and significantly lower on the external validation measure. Such results could mean that toward the end of life we are better able to appreciate life's beauty though less able to communicate our depth of appreciation to others. An alternative interpretation of the results is that the elderly participants were engaging in self-deception.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

An Exosomal Signature for Preoperative Detection of Occult Liver Metastasis in Pancreatic Cancer.

IMPORTANCE: Early liver metastasis (early-LiM) after pancreatectomy represents an aggressive biological phenotype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and is associated with markedly poor survival. Reliable preoperative biomarkers to identify occult hepatic micrometastasis remain lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop and externally validate a circulating exosomal microRNA (exo-miRNA)-based machine learning model for preoperative detection of occult early-LiM in PDAC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter retrospective case-control study included 3 phases: genome-wide discovery using exo-miRNA sequencing (discovery cohort), model development (training cohort), and independent external validation (2 validation cohorts). The study took place at 4 medical centers in China, Japan, and South Korea. A total of 372 patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2024. Data were analyzed from July 2024 to November 2025. EXPOSURES: Circulating plasma-derived exosomal miRNA expression profiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was early-LiM, defined as liver recurrence within 6 months after curative-intent resection. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 372 patients with PDAC (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-73] years; 229 [61.6%] male and 143 [38.4%] female; median follow-up among survivors, 969 days),early-LiM was associated with significantly worse overall survival compared with other recurrence patterns (median OS, 9.1 months vs 26.6-31.8 months; log-rank P < .001). A 7-exo-miRNA extreme gradient boosting model demonstrated discrimination in the training cohort (AUC, 0.899; 95% CI, 0.822-0.976) and maintained performance in external testing cohorts (AUC, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.846-0.951 and AUC, 0.862; 95% CI, 0.744-0.981). The exo-miRNA panel score remained an independent identifier of early-LiM in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 26.49; 95% CI, 18.45-55.28; P < .001) and stratified overall survival (log-rank P < .001). Decision curve analysis suggested improved net clinical benefit compared with conventional clinicopathologic variables. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this multicenter study, a circulating exo-miRNA-based machine learning model enabled preoperative detection of occult early liver metastasis risk in PDAC. These findings support the potential of exosomal biomarkers to inform biology-guided treatment sequencing and warrant prospective validation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1998

Threats to the validity of clinical trials employing enrichment strategies for sample selection.

Subject selection and exclusion criteria employed in typical clinical effectiveness trials of investigational new drugs have two fundamental aims: (1) to ensure that patients entering a study are truly suffering from the condition the drug is intended to treat and (2) to maximize the likelihood that the study will detect an effect of the drug if, in fact, one exists. Typical protocol selection criteria not only specify exacting procedures for establishing and documenting the diagnosis of those recruited for a study but also seek to increase, relative to the prevalence in the general population, the proportion of individuals in the sample likely to respond to pharmacological treatment. Because it is ordinarily impossible to learn prior to extensive clinical experience with a new drug which, if any, patient characteristics reliably predict a consistent treatment response, strategies for sample "enrichment" typically operate by excluding patients (for example, those with very advanced and/or complicated illness, those with serious concomitant illness, those at the extremes of age, those with very mild illness, and so forth) in whom a dependable response to treatment seems unlikely on logical and/or generic grounds. Some studies use positive strategies for sample "enrichment." In studies evaluating drugs intended to treat recurrent episodes of psychiatric illnesses, many protocols recommend selective recruitment of patients with a history of meaningful positive responses to antipsychotic treatment during prior episodes. Sample selection procedures of these kinds impose limits on the generalizability of a study's results (i.e., external validity), but the use of nonrandom patient samples is ordinarily held to have no effect on the internal validity of the results. In short, studies employing highly selected patient samples are, despite their limited external validity, regularly accepted as valid sources of evidence bearing on a drug's effectiveness. There are exceptions, however; this paper describes one in which the use of a seemingly innocuous sample enrichment maneuver proved highly damaging to the ultimate credibility of an important multicenter trial. In particular, exposure to an experimental treatment during an open qualification phase may invalidate drug-placebo comparisons made during a later randomized, blinded, controlled phase. Our review of the trial also reveals that the enrichment maneuver employed probably failed to accomplish its intended aims, selecting patients whose improvements on the outcome variable may be as reasonably ascribed to chance as to drug effect. This is all the more surprising because the method of sample enrichment employed has much in common with those long recommended in the clinical trial literature.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Machine learning vs. traditional methods for predicting postoperative cardiac complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate prediction of peri-operative cardiac complications is critical to optimise pre-operative decision-making. Traditional risk prediction scores, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, show only modest discrimination. Machine learning can model complex, non-linear relationships but their predictive performance compared with traditional scores remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was postoperative adverse cardiac events following non-cardiac surgery. Prediction models were assessed relative to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. As many studies evaluated multiple versions of each model type, the highest performing ('best version') and lowest performing ('worst version') results were analysed. Models were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: Thirteen studies evaluating 54 models and 927,113 patients were included. Machine learning approaches generally outperformed traditional risk scores. Automated machine learning ranked highest (SUCRA 96.6) showed the greatest improvement in the best version analysis (mean difference (MD) 0.28 (95%CrI 0.16-0.40)) and remained superior in the sensitivity analysis (MD 0.30 (95%CrI 0.14-0.45)). Gradient boosting models showed superior performance over the Revised Cardiac Risk Index across analysis (best version: MD 0.20 (95%CrI 0.14-0.26), worst version: MD 0.18 (95%CrI 0.12-0.25), SUCRA 82.4). The Gupta Perioperative Risk for Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest score outperformed the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in the best version analysis (MD 0.16 (95%CrI 0.01-0.32)). Between-study heterogeneity was low. None of the included studies externally validated their machine learning models and only six were judged to be at low risk of bias. DISCUSSION: Most machine learning models showed better discrimination than traditional risk scores, with automated machine learning and gradient boosting models ranking highest. However, study quality, calibration reporting and absence of external validation limit immediate clinical adoption. Prospective, multicentre evaluation is required before integration of these models into peri-operative practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Postoperative High Myopia in Children Undergoing Congenital Cataract Surgery With Intraocular Lens Implantation.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with the development of high myopia following congenital cataract surgery and to establish a robust predictive model. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. SUBJECTS: This retrospective study included 106 pediatric patients who underwent congenital cataract surgery with primary IOL implantation (mean follow-up 8.19 years). The model was externally validated in an independent cohort of 72 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.83 years. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative ocular biometric parameters were collected. Risk factors for postoperative high myopia were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression, which served as the basis for model construction. The predictive performance of the model was rigorously evaluated for discrimination and calibration. Discriminative ability was quantified using Harrell's C-index and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed via calibration plots by comparing predicted probabilities with actual observed outcomes. Internal validation was performed using a bootstrapping method (500 iterations) to ensure model stability and adjust for potential overfitting. RESULTS: An initial postoperative refraction of <+0.75D, and a higher IOL Power to Axial length Ratio (IOL/AL ratio) were identified as significant risk factors for the development of postoperative high myopia. Shorter preoperative axial length was associated with a greater magnitude of postoperative myopic shift. The predictive model demonstrated robust performance, achieving a C-index of 0.711 (internal validation C-index: 0.713). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for predicting high myopia at 5 and 10 years were 0.858 and 0.745, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes throughout the follow-up period. In external validation, the model achieved a C-index of 0.825, 5-year AUC of 0.833, and 10-year AUC of 0.713. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis established that initial postoperative refraction <+0.75D, and an elevated IOL/AL ratio are key determinants of high myopia risk following surgery. Shorter preoperative axial length was associated with a greater magnitude of postoperative myopic shift. This predictive framework provides clinicians with a practical tool to optimize preoperative IOL selection and identify high-risk infants who require vigilant myopia prevention and balanced amblyopia management.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

The Major Depression Rating Scale (MDS). Inter-rater reliability and validity across different settings in randomized moclobemide trials. Danish University Antidepressant Group.

The Major Depression Rating Scale (MDS) has been derived from the Hamilton Depression Scale and the Melancholia Scale. The MDS contains the nine DSM-IV items for major depression which all have anchoring scores from 0 to 4; hence, the theoretical score range is up to 36. The Major Depression Rating Scale has in this study been psychometrically analysed in randomized moclobemide trials. The results showed that the MDS had higher internal validity than the Hamilton Depression Scale. Thus, the homogeneity of the items was higher; factor analysis identified only one general depression factor (after 4 weeks of treatment explaining more than 50% of the variance). The inter-rater reliability of the two scales was of the same high level. The ability to measure changes (external validity) was tested in randomized clinical trials with moclobemide versus tricyclics (clomipramine and notriptyline) performed in Denmark in the psychiatric setting as well as in the general practice. The results showed that in the psychiatric setting tricyclics were superior to moclobemide with effect sizes ranging between 0.43 and 0.53. The highest effect size was obtained with the Melancholia Scale and the Major Depression Rating Scale, while the Hamilton Depression Scale was below 0.50. In the general practice setting no difference was found between moclobemide and clomipramine. In conclusion, the Major Depression Rating Scale has been found to have a more homogeneous factor structure than the Hamilton Depression Scale, but still with the same level of reliability and external validity. However, studies are needed to standardize the scale, especially in the general practice setting.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed2026

Transcriptome Analysis and Experimental Validation of Palmitoylation- Related Biomarkers in Atherosclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Protein palmitoylation contributes to membrane localisation, signal transduction, and cell-fate regulation. It is closely associated with lipid metabolic dysfunction, immune inflammation, and vascular remodelling in atherosclerosis (AS). However, key palmitoylation-related transcriptomic markers and their potential causal associations with AS remain incompletely defined. METHODS: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE100927 was used as the training cohort, and GSE43292 was used as an external validation cohort. Differentially expressed genes were identified using limma and intersected with palmitoylation-related genes to obtain palmitoylation-related differentially expressed genes (PRDEGs). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were then performed using clusterProfiler. Two-sample Mendelian randomisation was used to evaluate potential causal relationships between characteristic genes and AS. Feature selection was conducted using random forest and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and the overlapping genes selected by both methods were retained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess diagnostic performance. A five-gene nomogram was constructed, and its clinical utility was evaluated using calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was applied to compare pathway activity between high- and low-expression groups for each core gene. Single-cell analysis using Seurat and expression-based cell-cell communication analysis using CellChat were conducted with GSE159677, and upstream transcription factors were predicted using NetworkAnalyst. For in vivo validation, an AS model was established in ApoE⁸/⁸ mice fed a high-fat diet, and aortic gene and protein expression were assessed by RT-qPCR and western blotting. RESULTS: In GSE100927, 51 PRDEGs were identified. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses highlighted pathways associated with regulation of monoatomic ion transport, sarcomere and myofibril organisation, and immune inflammation. Mendelian randomisation suggested a potential protective causal association between SLC7A7 and AS. By integrating MR with random forest and SVM-RFE feature selection, we prioritised five core genes: PLCB2, GMIP, NEXN, PLN, and SLC7A7. These genes showed good diagnostic performance in GSE43292. The resulting nomogram was well calibrated and demonstrated stable net benefit in decision curve and clinical impact curve analyses. Single-gene GSVA identified consistently activated pathways across multiple genes, including innate and adaptive immune recognition, calcium signalling and myocardial contraction/cardiomyopathy, extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, cell junction pathways, autophagy-lysosome pathways, and several metabolic programmes. At the single-cell level, PLCB2 and GMIP were predominantly expressed in T cells and macrophages, NEXN and PLN were enriched in vascular smooth muscle cells, and SLC7A7 was mainly expressed in macrophages. CellChat analysis indicated increased signals for immune-related ligand-receptor interactions. In ApoE⁸/⁸ mice fed a high-fat diet, PLCB2, GMIP, and SLC7A7 were upregulated, whereas NEXN and PLN were downregulated; protein-level changes were concordant with the transcriptomic trends. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that palmitoylation-related dysregulation in AS converges on immune inflammation, calcium signalling/contractile programmes, ECM remodelling, and autophagy-linked metabolism. The five-gene panel is supported by external validation, single-cell localisation to immune and vascular compartments, and concordant results in ApoE⁸/⁸ mice. CONCLUSION: This study identified and validated five palmitoylation-related genes associated with AS. SLC7A7 showed a potential protective causal signal in MR analysis. The enriched pathway patterns linked these genes to immune inflammation, calcium signalling-contraction coupling, ECM remodelling, cell adhesion, and autophagy- associated metabolic reprogramming. The five-gene nomogram showed potential utility for diagnostic classification and decision support, nominating candidate biomarkers and pathway targets for AS molecular subtyping, diagnosis, and mechanistic investigation.

Atherosclerosis (AS)↗

PubMed2003

A classification-based machine learning approach for the analysis of genome-wide expression data.

Three important areas of data analysis for global gene expression analysis are class discovery, class prediction, and finding dysregulated genes (biomarkers). The clinical application of microarray data will require marker genes whose expression patterns are sufficiently well understood to allow accurate predictions on disease subclass membership. Commonly used methods of analysis include hierarchical clustering algorithms, t-, F-, and Z-tests, and machine learning approaches. We describe an approach called the maximum difference subset (MDSS) algorithm that combines classification algorithms, classical statistics, and elements of machine learning and provides a coherent framework. By integrating prediction accuracy, the MDSS algorithm learns the critical threshold of statistical significance (the alpha or P-value), eliminating the arbitrariness of setting a threshold of statistical significance and minimizing the effect of the normality assumptions. To reduce the false positive rate and to increase external validity of the predictive gene set, a jackknife step is used. This step identifies and removes genes in the initial MDSS with low combined predictive utility. The overall MDSS provides a prediction that is less dependent on an arbitrary study design (sample inclusion or exclusion) and should thus have high external validity. We demonstrate that this approach, unlike other published methods, identifies biomarkers capable of predicting the outcome of anthracycline-cytarabine chemotherapy in cases of acute myeloid leukemia. By incorporating two criteria-statistical significance and predictive utility-the approach learns the significance level relevant for a given data set. The MDSS approach can be used with any test and classifier operator pair.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Standard cost lists for healthcare in Canada. Issues in validity and inter-provincial consolidation.

A standard cost list is a listing of recommended costs for a selected group of services. Standard costs are used in economic evaluation studies to eliminate that proportion of cost differences between interventions that are due to cost differences between providers. In this article we provide a summary of cost lists for pharmaceutical economic evaluation purposes which have been developed in 2 provinces in Canada-Alberta and Manitoba. We then assess these 2 lists from 2 different viewpoints. First, we developed criteria for the internal and external validity of costs and, in light of these validity criteria, we assessed how the 2 standard cost lists compared with the 'ideal' measure of long run marginal costs. Second, we identified the criteria for the inter-provincial consolidation of standard cost measures (in order to develop a single, consolidated cost list); in light of these criteria, we assessed whether the degree to which the 2 separate lists could be consolidated. The lists achieved a considerable degree of external validity, but fared less well in terms of internal validity. However, these results depend on the 'ideal' measure of cost which is used. The lists, in the forms which were developed, are not easily consolidated into a single list. Further refined cost data would be needed in order to achieve consolidation.

Alberta↗

PubMed1998

What is the scientific meaning of empirically supported therapy?

It is important to define precisely what is and is not meant by "empirically supported treatments," rigorously based on what is actually known about the nature of experimental therapy research. The criteria for empirically supported treatments merely allow conclusions about whether treatments cause any change beyond the causative effect of such factors as placebo or the passage of time. Applied implications are limited, due to external validity and to the fact that applied decisions are influenced by cost-benefit analyses. Creating increasingly effective therapies through between-group designs is best done by controlled trials specifically aimed at basic questions about the nature of psychological problems and the nature of therapeutic change mechanisms. Naturalistic research is important for external validity but is valuable only if it uses scientifically valid methods to address basic knowledge questions.

Empiricism↗

PubMed2025

Distinct immune-metabolic phenotypes underlie poor coronary collateral circulation.

BACKGROUND: Coronary collateral circulation (CCC) significantly impacts myocardial perfusion and clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease patients, yet the underlying molecular heterogeneity remains inadequately characterized. OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct molecular phenotypes in patients with poor CCC, validate these phenotypes using clinical parameters, and evaluate their prognostic implications. METHODS: This study enrolled 149 patients (80 with good CCC and 69 with poor CCC) for high-throughput proteomic profiling. Unsupervised consensus clustering identified molecular subtypes within poor CCC patients, followed by differential expression analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment. Boruta feature selection was implemented, and multiple machine learning algorithms were tested on clinical data, with XGBoost optimization (accuracy 80.0%, F1-score 80.31%) and SHAP value interpretation. External validation was performed using the MIMIC database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models assessed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: Two distinct phenotypes emerged among poor CCC patients: Cluster 1 (n = 39, Complement-Driven Vascular Remodeling [CDVR]) and Cluster 2 (n = 30, Immuno-Thrombotic Myocardial Dysfunction [ITMD]). An XGBoost model incorporating fasting glucose, eosinophil percentage, and HbA1c achieved excellent discrimination (AUC > 0.91). External validation confirmed the phenotype-specific clinical patterns. Notably, Cluster 2 demonstrated significantly higher MACE incidence compared to Cluster 1 (Log-rank p < 0.05), with KEGG analysis revealing significant upregulation of platelet activation, diabetic cardiomyopathy, and metabolic pathways in the ITMD phenotype. CONCLUSION: Poor CCC encompasses distinct immune-metabolic phenotypes that can be accurately classified using integrated proteomic-clinical modeling. This classification enables more precise risk stratification and may guide personalized therapeutic strategies for coronary artery disease patients with inadequate collateralization.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A CFH- and SPINT2-based prognostic signature for cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, and reliable biomarkers for postoperative risk stratification remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a CFH- and SPINT2-based prognostic signature to support postoperative risk stratification and inform adjuvant therapy selection in CCA through integrative machine learning and single-cell transcriptomics. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes were screened from GSE26566. Integrative machine learning (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox, random forest, and univariate Cox regression) was performed in the training cohort (GSE89749; n=115) to construct a risk model, which was externally validated in two independent cohorts: cohort 1 (E-MTAB-6389; n=75) and cohort 2 [The Cancer Genome Atlas Cholangiocarcinoma (TCGA-CHOL) data set; n=36]. Systematic analysis was conducted and included examinations of immune infiltration [via single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA)], pathway enrichment (via hallmark GSEA), cellular localization (via single-cell RNA sequencing), and drug sensitivity (via the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer 2 database). RESULTS: Two genes, CFH and SPINT2, were identified and incorporated into a prognostic risk score. High-risk patients in the training cohort had a significantly worse overall survival (log-rank P=0.02). External validation was performed in two independent cohorts. In validation cohort 1, the risk group was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio =2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.37; P=0.01]. In validation cohort 2, the model demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (concordance index =0.721; 3-year area under the curve =0.692). The high-risk group exhibited an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by increased infiltration of macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, along with the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, inflammatory response, and NF-κB signaling pathways. Single-cell analysis revealed a cell-type-specific expression pattern: CFH was predominantly expressed in fibroblasts, while SPINT2 was mainly expressed in malignant cells. Drug sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the high-risk group was more sensitive to gemcitabine, cisplatin, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, whereas the low-risk group was more sensitive to lapatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The CFH- and SPINT2-based prognostic signature may serve as an independent biomarker for postoperative risk stratification in CCA. High-risk patients, characterized by fibroblast-derived CFH enrichment and malignant-cell SPINT2 loss, exhibit an immunosuppressive microenvironment and may be more suitable for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or PARP/mTOR inhibitors, whereas low-risk patients may benefit from less intensive adjuvant strategies or HER2/EGFR-targeted lapatinib. Prospective validation is warranted before clinical implementation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)↗

PubMed1999

Psychometric properties of the French version of the composite scale of morningness in adults.

The objective of this study was to provide a reliable instrument to measure morningness for upcoming studies in French samples, using the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), which has been translated into French. Nursing students (n = 356) completed the questionnaire between February and March 1997. The total score obtained was independent of age and gender, and normally distributed. The reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85), and factorial analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the scale. Evening-type subjects are thought to score under 31, and morning-type subjects are thought to score above 44. As an external validation, morningness was associated, on weekdays and weekends, with early rising times and bedtimes and early peak times of physical and mental performance. In conclusion, we found that the English and the French versions of the Composite Scale of Morningness gave identical results. The scale is reliable and can be used for French-speaking adult samples. Nevertheless, normative data and other external validity criteria are needed.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Exploration and experimental verification of triaptosis-related prognostic genes and cells in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Triaptosis is a recently characterized form of programmed cell death with unclear implications in cancer. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance and biological relevance of triaptosis in gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA-STAD and GSE62254, and single-cell RNA sequencing data from GSE183904 were analyzed. Triaptosis-related gene (TRG) scores were calculated using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis. Differentially expressed genes identified in TRG-score and GC-versus-normal comparisons underwent functional enrichment, Cox regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to develop an externally validated signature. Immune profiles, pathway activity, somatic mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), predicted drug sensitivity, and clinical features were compared by risk group. Single-cell analyses assessed TRG activity, prognostic gene expression, cell-cell communication, and pseudotime. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and Western blotting assessed mRNA expression and protein levels, respectively. RESULTS: A TRG-based prognostic model comprising ASPN, GRB14, and VTN was developed and externally validated, effectively distinguishing patients into two distinct risk groups with notably different survival outcomes. mRNA expression of all three genes and their protein levels were significantly higher in SGC-7901 cells than in GES-1 cells. High-risk patients had higher stromal scores and distinct immune profiles; 15 immune cell types differed between groups. Single-cell analysis revealed fibroblasts and pericytes among high-TRG-active cell types. Prognostic genes were significantly overexpressed in fibroblasts, which also showed high TRG activity. Fibroblasts demonstrated enhanced communication with pericytes, whereas tumor-derived fibroblasts showed weaker communication with macrophages, indicating immune microenvironment remodeling. CONCLUSION: The three-gene prognostic signature predicted GC prognosis and was associated with distinct immune and genomic features, suggesting potential value for risk stratification and personalized treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve LUAD risk prediction. METHODS: PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included PRS-25, PRS-CT, and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2+PRS-EUR128, PRS-CSx, and CT-SLEB. Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium (FLCCA) and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort (NJLCC). We assessed predictive accuracy via AUC, with 10-year and (age 30-80) absolute risks estimates. RESULTS: The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB (clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes), outperformed the best East Asian-only PRS (LDpred2; AUC=0.629, 95% CI:0.618,0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI:0.629,0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI:1.61,1.82) per SD increase. NJLCC Validation confirmed robust performance (AUC =0.649, 95% CI: 0.623, 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher LUAD risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41, nine years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance LUAD risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.

East Asian never smokers↗

PubMed1999

Development of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory for Adolescents: the QOLIE-AD-48.

PURPOSE: We report the development of an instrument to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: A sample of 197 English-speaking adolescents (aged 11-17 years) with epilepsy completed a test questionnaire of 88 items. Also included were mastery and self-esteem scales to assess external validity. A parent simultaneously completed an 11-item questionnaire to evaluate the child's HRQOL. Both adolescent and parent questionnaires were repeated in 2-4 weeks. Demographic information and information pertaining to seizures were collected at baseline along with assessment of systemic and neurologic toxicity. RESULTS: The QOLIE-AD-48 contains 48 items in eight subscales: epilepsy impact (12 items), memory/concentration (10), attitudes toward epilepsy (four), physical functioning (five), stigma (six), social support (four), school behavior (four), health perceptions (three), and a total summary score, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL. Internal construct validity was demonstrated in a single-factor solution for the eight dimensions. All correlations were statistically significant at p < 0.05 level. Internal consistency reliability estimated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.74 for the summary score and ranged from a low of 0.52 (three-item Health Perceptions Scale) to 0.73-0.94 for the other individual scales. Good test-retest reliability was found for the overall measure (0.83). Summary score correlations with the two external validity scales, self-efficacy and self-esteem were 0.65 and 0.54, respectively. Statistically significant differences in summary scores indicating that HRQOL was increasingly better for adolescents as seizure severity decreases (no seizures = 77+/-13, low = 70+/-17, high = 63+/-17) were found among seizure-severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data describe the development of a robust instrument to evaluate HRQOL in adolescents with epilepsy. Empiric analyses provide strong evidence that the QOLIE-AD-48 is both a reliable and valid measure for adolescents with epilepsy.

Adolescent↗