Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

National survey of anticoagulation policy in endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulated patients who need to undergo endoscopy present unique challenges to the gastroenterologist. The continuation of anticoagulant therapy increases the risk of haemorrhagic complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Reversing the anticoagulation increases the risk of thromboembolism. In our experience in various endoscopy units, there are variable policies on the management of anticoagulated patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: To study the current practice, survey questionnaires were sent to 2320 doctors, working in 231 hospitals across the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 219 hospitals (94.8%), but only from 434 doctors (18.7%). The results show 40.8% endoscopists continued the patients on warfarin when performing a planned upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, whereas 26% stopped it; 33.2% gave varying reports, that is, they used their own judgement according to the disease for which the anticoagulant was being given. For planned lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, 48.7% doctors preferred to stop warfarin; 53.3% of the endoscopists stated that they have a policy in place at their hospital for both upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in anticoagulated patients; 5.5% had a policy for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy only and 6.2% for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy only. Thirty-five per cent doctors reported that they did not have any standard policy. We compared the responses from within a hospital to see whether the doctors were uniformly aware of an existing policy in their hospital. For upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the responses were the same (either yes or no) by 51% of the doctors, whereas they were different by 49%. For lower gastrointestinal endoscopies, the same response was given by 49% of the doctors, whereas 51% gave different answers. The poor response rate from the doctors, however, makes firm interpretation of the data difficult. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variation in practice is seen across the country. A robust national guideline to streamline the endoscopy practice in anticoagulated patients is needed.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2002

Virtual laryngotracheal endoscopy based on geometric surface modeling using spiral computed tomography data.

This prospective study describes the clinical utility of virtual endoscopy based on geometric surface modeling of the laryngotracheal lumen. Eighteen children with dyspnea related to either subglottic angioma (n = 5) or laryngotracheal stenosis (n = 13) were included. All patients underwent video-recorded operative endoscopy, spiral computed tomography, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the laryngotracheal lumen. Modeling was achieved by contour detection on spiral computed tomographic images and reconstruction using a geometric shape-recognition algorithm. The generated surface was used for diagnosis and measurement using interactive and automatic tools. Findings of virtual endoscopy and operative endoscopy were compared. Virtual endoscopy confirmed narrowing of the airway in all cases. In 9 cases, high-grade stenosis prevented complete operative endoscopy, but virtual endoscopy allowed accurate assessment and measurement of the stenosis. The findings of operative and virtual endoscopy were concordant in 9 cases. We conclude that surface modeling provides valuable information for preoperative evaluation of laryngotracheal narrowing. The ability to assess extraluminal anatomy provides a clearer picture of overall disease involvement. In the future, virtual endoscopy will probably be used in conjunction with operative endoscopy for therapeutic decision-making. Noninvasive virtual endoscopy could become an alternative to traditional endoscopy under general anesthesia for therapeutic follow-up.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Usefulness of narrow-band imaging endoscopy for diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: A newly developed endoscope lighting system called a narrow-band imaging system emphasizes certain histological features such as capillary and crypt pattern. The usefulness of NBI for the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) was evaluated. METHODS: Eleven patients with previously diagnosed BE were enrolled in this study. Magnifying endoscopy was performed by an experienced endoscopist, using both a conventional system and an NBI system. All images were recorded by video and by a digital still image filing system. Differences in images were evaluated by another experienced endoscopist. The quality of images for the visualization of the esophagogastric junction, capillary vessels, and columnar-lined esophagus (CLE) was judged as: optimal (score of 4), diagnostic (3), suboptimal (2), or nondiagnostic (1). RESULTS: In contrast to the low rate of visualization of the esophagogastric junction by conventional endoscopy, visualization of this area endoscopy was better by NBI. Net-like blood vessels were more clearly seen on images obtained by NBI endoscopy. Visualization of the CLE was better by NBI endoscopy than by conventional endoscopy. In contrast to conventional endoscopy, NBI endoscopy captured the optimal view of Barrett's epithelium. The relationship between the endoscopic and histopathologic diagnoses was more accurate by NBI endoscopy than by conventional endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy by NBI is more useful than conventional magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of BE.

Barrett Esophagus↗
PubMed2000

Gastric mucosal surface in cirrhosis evaluated by magnifying endoscopy and scanning electronic microscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastric mucosa may have several tiny patterns in portal hypertension. In this prospective study, we used magnifying endoscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to better characterize the morphology of gastric mucosa in patients with cirrhosis, and we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Videotapes of gastric mucosal patterns from 39 cirrhotic patients and 20 control patients were blindly evaluated by the same observer using magnifying endoscopy (magnification x 25) and conventional endoscopy. SEM was performed in 12 other patients. The basic anatomical entities of the gastric architecture on conventional endoscopy were the gastric area in control patients and the mosaic pattern in patients with cirrhosis. RESULTS: With regard to the prevalence of endoscopic patterns in the antrum, the mosaic pattern was more frequent in cirrhotic patients. In the body, the mosaic pattern, white spots, and red marks were significantly more frequent in cirrhotic patients, whereas gastric areas were more frequent in control patients. Concerning the contributions of the techniques, significantly more gastric areas were identified by magnifying endoscopy than by conventional endoscopy. However, in multivariate analysis, only conventional endoscopy with esophageal varices had significant independent diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosis, and magnifying endoscopy of mucosal signs did not add any significant information. SEM did not improve discrimination between control and cirrhotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Magnifying endoscopy provides more details of the mucosa, thus improving the delineation of gastric mucosal morphology. However, magnifying endoscopy has little clinical value in cirrhosis since it does not improve on the accuracy of conventional endoscopy for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

First-time endoscopy and use of antisecretory medication: a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnostic evaluation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The relation between endoscopy and use of antisecretory medication on a population level is unknown. The aim of this study was to describe development in the number of patients undergoing first-time endoscopies and their use of antisecretory medication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on the use of endoscopies and antisecretory medication (H2 blockers and proton-pump inhibitors) were extracted from five population-based databases and included all citizens in Funen County (population 470,000) who had first-time endoscopies between 1993 and 2002. RESULTS: A total of 27,829 first-time endoscopy patients were identified. In 2002 the number of first-time endoscopies was 5.6/1000 persons. The proportion that had redeemed prescription(s) on antisecretory medication the last year before endoscopy increased from 33% (1095/3286) in 1993 to 41% (1012/2445) in 2002 (p = 0.000). Following endoscopy, average use of antisecretory medication increased by 90 defined daily doses (DDD)/patient/year (95% CI 84-96) in patients with oesophagitis (N = 4850), by 59 DDD/patient/year (95% CI 54-64) in peptic ulcer patients (N = 4373) and by 18 DDD/patient/year (95% CI 16-20) in patients with normal endoscopies (N = 16,400). CONCLUSIONS: An increasing proportion of patients are treated with antisecretory medication before endoscopy. Following endoscopy, use of antisecretory medication increases irrespective of the diagnostic findings.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A pilot study of autofluorescent endoscopy for the in vivo detection of laryngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the advantage of autofluorescent endoscopy for the identification of laryngeal cancer. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, multicenter clinical study. We investigated whether autofluorescent endoscopy using the Lung Imaging Fluorescent Endoscopy (LIFE)-Lung System (Xillix, Olympus) is capable of identifying early cancer of the larynx, especially in comparison with conventional white-light endoscopy and microscopic laryngoscopy. Benign lesions as well as microinvasive and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx were investigated. For logistic reasons and because of the pilot character of this study, the number of patients was limited. METHODS: Sixteen patients having 24 laryngeal lesions of both benign or malignant character were subsequently examined by autofluorescent endoscopy, white-light endoscopy, and microscopic laryngoscopy. Based on optical appearance, and for each method separately, the lesions were classified as malignant or not. The visual results were documented and histologically verified. RESULTS: The sensitivity of autofluorescent endoscopy for laryngeal cancer detection was more than 90% and therefore higher than that of white-light endoscopy and microscopic laryngoscopy. However, as far as laryngeal cancer is concerned, the specificity of autofluorescent endoscopy was very low. Many of the false-positive results were due to inflammation, hypervascularization, and edema. CONCLUSION: Autofluorescent endoscopy is advantageous only in the hands of an experienced ENT specialist. Although it does not replace the combination of white-light endoscopy and a critical evaluation of the clinical symptoms of the individual disease, it can profitably complement them. Autofluorescent endoscopy can help in determining whether microscopic laryngoscopy performed with general anesthesia should be recommended urgently to the patient. Microscopic laryngoscopy remains the best method for the identification of malignant lesions, if it is combined with obtaining taking multiple biopsy specimens. Confirmation of the results of this pilot study with a larger series of patients is desirable.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[CT virtual endoscopy: A study of the capability to display the structures and abnormalities in nasal cavity].

To evaluate displaying ability of virtual endoscopy and its clinical application in comparison with fiberoptic nasal endoscopy, 11 patients (22 nasal cavities) were examined by virtual endoscopy after axial spiral CT scanning was performed. Virtual endoscopy was performed by Explorer software package in a computer workstation. 9 patients (18 nasal cavities) underwent fiberoptic endoscopy. Results showed virtual endoscopy could clearly demonstrate the anatomical structures in nasal cavity, septal deviation, nasal meatus narrowing and obstruction, turbinate hyperplasia, and pathological masses larger than 3 mm in diameter. However, the "false adhesions" may appear with virtual endoscopy. The main limitation of virtual endoscopy was inability to evaluate mucosa and lack of histological diagnosis. Virtual endoscopy is a new and non-invasive method for demonstrating anatomical structures and diseases in nasal cavity. Its displaying ability is comparable with fiberoptic nasal endoscopy. It can serve as a supplementary method of fiberoptic nasal endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy does not reassure patients with functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with functional dyspepsia is often carried out merely to reassure patients that symptoms are not due to serious pathology. The aim of this study was to compare anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life as proxy values for reassurance in patients with functional dyspepsia before and after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for endoscopy between February 2002 and February 2004 were included in the study. They were asked to score anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, health-related quality of life using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire, and their impression of their own general health using a visual analogue scale, 2 weeks before endoscopy and again 1 month afterwards. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included, 42 % of whom were found to have an organic abnormality of some sort during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Neither the anxiety nor the depression frequencies differed significantly before and after endoscopy, either in patients with organic abnormalities at endoscopy or in those without. The general impression of health did not change after endoscopy either: organic abnormalities 62.7 +/- 27.4 vs. 64.9 +/- 24.2, P = 0.28; functional dyspepsia 61.0 +/- 27.9 vs. 62.8 +/- 27.2, P = 0.39. Only patients who had organic abnormalities reported a slightly improved quality of life 1 month after endoscopy: 0.74 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.12, P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In patients with functional dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy does not improve psychological well-being or health-related quality of life. In view of the invasiveness, cost, and potential harm associated with endoscopy, careful consideration should be given to whether this procedure should be carried out merely for the sake of the patient's "peace of mind".

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Impact of upper endoscopy on satisfaction in patients with previously uninvestigated dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: In patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia who undergo endoscopy, the presence of abnormal findings guides subsequent management. However, upper endoscopy is "negative" in the majority of these patients, and the value of endoscopy in these individuals has been questioned. This study evaluated the impact of endoscopy on patient satisfaction in patients with previously uninvestigated dyspepsia. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data obtained from a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial, evaluating a 6-week course of omeprazole versus placebo in 140 patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia who were followed for up to 1 year. The setting was the primary care outpatient clinics at the Houston Veterans Affairs Hospital. Participants had to be 18 years of age or older with at least a 1-week history of dyspepsia (epigastric discomfort) without alarm features. Satisfaction was measured at each visit with the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment, a validated, reliable dyspepsia-related health measure that has a satisfaction scale (scores 2-23; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction). Patients unresponsive to empiric therapy with placebo or omeprazole based on predefined criteria underwent endoscopy. Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment satisfaction scores were analyzed for 5 visits: 2 closest in time to, but before, the day of endoscopy (Times 1 and 2); immediately before endoscopy (Time 3); and the 2 visits closest in time after endoscopy (Times 4 and 5). After determining there was no difference in treatment failure rates between patients who received placebo or omeprazole, data from these groups were combined. The mean Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment satisfaction scores for Times 1 through 5 in all patients who underwent endoscopy were compared as well as for subgroups with positive and negative endoscopic findings with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Data on all 5 visits were available in 62 patients, 36 of whom had a negative endoscopy. For all patients the mean scores for Time 2 (8.5; 95% CI [7.4, 9.6]), and Time 3 (7.6; 95% CI [6.6, 8.6]) were significantly lower than those for Time 4 (13.7; 95% CI [12.2, 15.3]) and Time 5 (14.4; 95% CI [12.9, 15.9]). The mean score for Time 1 (11.1; 95% CI [9.5, 12.6]) was significantly lower than the mean score for Time 5. Similar significant improvements in satisfaction scores were observed in subgroups with negative and positive findings. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously uninvestigated dyspepsia, endoscopy leads to improved patient satisfaction regardless of the endoscopic findings.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed2004

Who is willing to undergo endoscopy without sedation: patients, nurses, or the physicians?

OBJECTIVES: Some studies suggest that the majority of the United States population is now willing to undergo unsedated endoscopy. We studied the willingness of patients, nurses, and physicians to undergo endoscopy without sedation. METHODS: Adult patients presenting to us for outpatient endoscopy at two large tertiary care level 1 trauma hospitals were asked to fill out a survey questionnaire recording their demographic information, prior experience with endoscopy and sedation, and whether they were willing to undergo unsedated endoscopy. Their anxiety level was assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. After the endoscopic procedure, patients were asked whether they had any change in their decision regarding unsedated endoscopy. A random convenience sample of physicians and nurses were also given a questionnaire asking about their experience with endoscopy and whether they were willing to undergo such procedures without sedation. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients, 117 nurses, and 51 physicians participated in the study. Only 19.5% of patients were willing to undergo upper endoscopy without sedation. Among patients, the willingness dropped to 6.75% postprocedurally. Results were similar for colonoscopy. Physicians were least likely to agree to an unsedated procedure (2.2%). Gastroenterology (GI) nurses were more likely to undergo unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (39.3%) as opposed to non-GI nurses (7.1%, P < 0.001). 19.6% of GI nurses agreed to unsedated colonoscopy versus 0% in the non-GI group (P = 0.001). Preprocedure anxiety level was not found to be a predictor for willingness to undergo unsedated endoscopy. Female patients were more likely to forego sedation preprocedurally (OR = 5.75; 95% CI = 2.05-16.2). However, postprocedurally, gender was no longer a significant predictor. Similarly, among the nurses and physicians, neither age nor gender was a significant predictor of willingness to undergo unsedated endoscopy. Patients with a high school (OR = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.01-0.06) or associates degree (OR = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.01-0.35) were less likely to forego sedation. CONCLUSION: In contrast to reports from some major medical centers, the current study found that most patients as well as medical professionals were unwilling to undergo endoscopy without sedation.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine how appropriately physicians in 1981 did upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a randomly selected, community-based sample of Medicare patients. DESIGN: We developed a comprehensive and clinically detailed list of 1069 indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A national panel of nine clinicians rated the appropriateness of the indications. We categorized the indications as appropriate, inappropriate, or equivocal. We did a clinically detailed medical record review of a random sample of 1585 patients having upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to assess the appropriateness of using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. SETTING: Patients were sampled from large geographic areas in three states. Two areas represented high use, and one area, low use. PATIENTS: Random sample of patients 65 years of age or older receiving diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: None; the study was retrospective. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Patient characteristics, histories, and clinical indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were similar across low- and high-use areas. Overall, 72% of the endoscopies were done for appropriate indications, 11% for equivocal indications, and 17% for inappropriate indications. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (26%), follow-up to an abnormal upper gastrointestinal series (21%), dysphagia (18%), and dyspepsia (15%) were the most frequent clinical reasons for doing endoscopy. Inpatient endoscopies were more often appropriate and less often inappropriate than outpatient endoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of practice patterns among study sites provides the clinical basis for understanding the use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The finding of 17% inappropriate use may be cause for concern.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Digestive endoscopy in neonates. Personal experience].

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is actually considered an essential diagnostic and therapeutic technique both in pediatrician and in newborn infants. At the moment upper GI endoscopy in neonatal age allows to explore the esophagus, stomach and duodenum; instead lower GI endoscopy easily reaches sigmoid-colon junction. The exploration of other distal parts of bowel is more difficult and with more risks. Therefore it has to be make only if it is necessary. In the newborn this exam should be so fast not to require premedication. In our study, we considered every neonatal patient who underwent GI endoscopy at the "Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Service of Pediatric Clinic-University of Parma" (from September 1983 to June 2000). We considered two groups of patients: first group: early neonatal age (0-14 days) second group: late neonatal age (15-28 days). We made 127 endoscopies: 112 of these were upper GI. The most frequent symptoms that babies showed and indicated upper GI endoscopy were reflux and/or vomiting (86%). Upper operative GI endoscopies included also 7 esophageal dilatations. The lower GI endoscopies were 15 and in all the cases the indication was intestinal bleeding. We conclude that the GI endoscopy in the neonates shows a diagnostic sensibility and specificity really high and for sure better than the radiology for mucosal lesions. Also GI endoscopy can be not only a very precious diagnostic instrument but also therapeutic in neonatal disease. Considering the age of the little patients, it is very important that only endoscopists with large experience use this technique.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Upper GI endoscopy in children- in an adult suite.

UNLABELLED: Although Upper GI endoscopy is commonly performed in adults, paediatric endoscopy is not available in many of our referral centres. The efficacy and safety of upper GI endoscopy in paediatric age group performed in adult suite of Kathmandu Medical College is reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A retrospective study of endoscopies performed on children aged up to 15 years in an adult endoscopy suite of Kathmandu medical college over last one year is presented. All cases were the referred cases from paediatric unit for various problems. RESULTS: Endoscopy in paediatric group comprises only 6% of total upper GI endoscopies performed during the same year. Sex ratio was almost equal. Most cases (87%) were performed under local anaesthetic and well tolerated by the patients. Recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) was the commonest indication and among them one third of cases had significant positive finding. CONCLUSION: Upper GI endoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool in children. Where specialized paediatric endoscopy units are not feasible i.e. developing countries, endoscopic services to children can be safely provided in adult endoscopy suite with or without sedation. Upper GI endoscopy is well tolerated by children even without sedation.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2006

[Evaluation of diagnostic yield and clinical impact of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding].

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The major indication of small bowel capsule endoscopy is the diagnostics of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. The present retrospective study was aimed to analyze the diagnostic yield, positive and negative predictive values and clinical impact of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 36 month period at two workplaces 66 capsule endoscopy studies were performed in 62 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding who had undergone non-diagnostic upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Capsule video recordings were evaluated by two investigators at both workplaces. Capsule endoscopy findings were divided into 3 groups according to the bleeding source: definitive bleeding source (48 patients), uncertain bleeding potential (5 patients), and negative finding (8 patient). Patients after capsule endoscopy were followed-up until a mean of 20 (1-41) months. RESULTS: A definitive small bowel bleeding source was detected in 78.7% of the cases studied by capsule endoscopy. Definitive bleeding sources included angiodysplasia (28 cases), small bowel Crohn's disease (5 cases), small bowel tumor (5 cases), small bowel stenosis (2 cases), NSAID therapy related ulcer (1 case), non-specific inflammation (1 case) and helminthiasis (1 case) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of capsule endoscopy studies were 95.8% and 84.6% respectively. In cases with definitive bleeding sources 72% of patients received therapy in accordance with capsule endoscopy findings (surgery in 18 patients, medical treatment modification in 16 patients, chemoembolisation in 1 patient). During the follow-up period 17.7% of the patients had rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is a useful and effective diagnostic method in cases with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Effective therapy may be introduced in accordance with the majority of positive capsule endoscopy results.

Angiodysplasia↗
PubMed2005

A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Unsedated upper endoscopy is an attractive alternative to conventional sedated endoscopy because it can reduce the cost, complications, and recovery time of the procedure. However, it has not gained widespread acceptance in the United States. A prototype 4-mm-diameter video esophagoscope is available. Our aims were to compare unsedated esophagoscopy using this 4-mm esophagoscope with conventional sedated endoscopy with regard to diagnostic accuracy and patient tolerance, to determine the optimal intubation route (transnasal vs. transoral), and to identify the predictors of tolerance of unsedated endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients presenting for conventional endoscopy were randomized to undergo unsedated esophagoscopy by either the transnasal or the transoral route, followed by conventional endoscopy. The diagnostic findings, optical quality, and patient tolerance scores were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were approached and 90 (65.6 %) were randomized to undergo esophagoscopy by the transnasal route (n = 44) or by the transoral route (n = 46) before undergoing conventional esophagoscopy. Patient tolerance of unsedated esophagoscopy was comparable to that of conventional endoscopy. The transnasal route was better tolerated than the transoral route, except with respect to pain, and 93.2 % in transnasal group and 91.3 % in transoral group were willing to have the procedure again. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy using the 4-mm video endoscope was similar to that of standard endoscopy. Patients who tolerated the procedure well had lower preprocedure anxiety scores (29 vs. 42.5, P = 0.021) and a higher body mass index (31.5 kg/m2 vs. 28 kg/m2, P = 0.029) than the other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated esophagoscopy with a 4-mm esophagoscope was well tolerated and has a level of diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of conventional endoscopy. Factors associated with good tolerance of unsedated esophagoscopy were low anxiety levels, high body mass index, and use of the transnasal route. Unsedated endoscopy may be offered to a selected group of patients based on these criteria.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma is rising, with chronic reflux and Barrett's oesophagus being considered risk factors. Reliable detection of Barrett's oesophagus during upper endoscopy is therefore mandatory but requires both endoscopy and histology for confirmation. Appropriate management of patients with endoscopic suspicion but negative on histology, or vice versa, or of patients with no endoscopic suspicion but with a biopsy diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction, has not yet been studied prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, 929 patients (51% male, mean age 50 years) referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included; 59% had reflux symptoms. The endoscopic aspect of the Z line and any suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus were noted, and biopsies were taken in all patients from the Z line (n = 4), gastric cardia (n = 2), and body and antrum (n = 2 each). Biopsies positive for specialised intestinal metaplasia (SIM) were reviewed by a reference pathologist for a final Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis. All patients with endoscopic and/or histological suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus were invited for a follow up endoscopy; the remaining cases (no endoscopic or histological suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus) were followed clinically. RESULTS: Of 235 patients positive for Barrett's oesophagus on endoscopy and/or histology, 63% agreed to undergo repeat endoscopy (mean follow up period 30.5 months). 46% of patients with an endoscopic Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis but no histological confirmation (group A) showed the same distribution, a further 42% did not have Barrett's oesophagus, and 11% had confirmed Barrett's oesophagus on both endoscopy and biopsy on follow up. In the group with a histological Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis but negative on initial endoscopy (group B), follow up showed the same in 26% whereas 46% had no Barrett's oesophagus, and confirmed Barrett's oesophagus (endoscopy plus histology) was diagnosed in 17%. Of the study population, 16 patients had Barrett's oesophagus on initial endoscopy confirmed by histology which remained constant in 70% at follow up (group C). Of the remaining patients without an initial Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis on either endoscopy or histology (group D) and only clinical follow up (mean follow up period 38 months), one confirmed Barrett's oesophagus case was found among 100 patients re-endoscoped outside of the study protocol. However, no single case of dysplasia or cancer of the distal oesophagus was detected in any patient during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a specialised gastroenterology setting, reproducibility of presumptive endoscopic or histological diagnoses of Barrett's oesophagus at follow up were poor. Only 10-20% of cases with either endoscopic or histological suspicion of Barrett's oesophagus had established Barrett's oesophagus after 2.5 years of follow up. The risk of dysplasia in this population was very low and hence meticulous follow up may not be required.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Outcome of capsule endoscopy in determining indication and route for push-and-pull enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Video capsule endoscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy (PPE), both allow a complete examination of the small bowel in patients with suspected intestinal disorders. Due to the invasiveness of PPE, indications should probably be selective. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of an approach whereby capsule endoscopy was used to select patients in whom PPE was indicated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 164 patients were included (90 men; age 54+/-18 years) with various indications for small-bowel investigation, such as obscure bleeding (n=88), suspected Crohn's (n=14) or celiac (n=12) disease, or known or strongly suspected localized diseases such as neoplasms (n = 18) for biopsy. Four patients with a suspected intestinal stenosis underwent PPE without prior capsule endoscopy. In the remaining 160 patients, who had a capsule endoscopy, PPE was selected if there were lesions requiring biopsy or angiodysplasias to be treated by argon plasma coagulation (APC). Regarding the insertion route, an anal PPE was indicated if the capsule transit time from ingestion to arrival at the lesion was >or= 75 % of the total time from ingestion to arrival at the cecum. After gut cleansing, PPE was performed with general anesthesia, and the small bowel was examined until the lesion was reached or the scope could not be advanced further. If the suspected lesion had not been reached, a second procedure was performed through the alternative route, under the same conditions. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy was 75 %. According to the indications, 47 PPE procedures were performed in 42 patients, including 33 through the oral route, 4 through the anal route and 5 combined ones. Indications were: suspicion of intestinal tumor (n=13), celiac disease with chronic bleeding (n=4), suspicion of Crohn's disease (n=3), treatment of significant arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (n=10), diffuse enteropathies (n=3), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related conditions (n=2), and obscure digestive bleeding (n=3). Lesions detected by capsule endoscopy were reached by PPE in all but two cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) of capsule endoscopy to make a correct indication for PPE was 94.7 % and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.3 %. The PPV and NPV of a time index of > 0.75 to start via the anal route were 94.7 % and 96.7 %. No complications were observed and all patients were discharged the day after the procedure. Follow-up at 9 months showed that capsule endoscopy followed by PPE had positively influenced the management of 90.5 % of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of capsule endoscopy as a filter for PPE results in effective management of patients with various intestinal diseases. Capsule endoscopy can also direct the choice of route of PPE; a time index of > 0.75 appears to reliably indicate an anal route so that a double procedure is required in only about 12 % of cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is used to investigate the small bowel in patients with GI bleeding of obscure etiology. Capsule endoscopy was compared prospectively with push enteroscopy in 20 patients with GI hemorrhage. METHODS: Twenty patients (8 men, 12 women; mean age 65.5 years, range 38-80 years) were enrolled in the study. All had undergone non-diagnostic EGD, colonoscopy, and barium contrast radiography of the small bowel. All patients underwent capsule endoscopy followed by push enteroscopy. The physician performing the enteroscopy (senior endoscopist) interpreted the capsule endoscopy in an unblinded manner, while a second blinded reviewer (endoscopy fellow) interpreted the capsule endoscopy to establish interinterpreter reliability. RESULTS: There was complete agreement between the blinded and the unblinded physicians in 18 of 20 cases; minor disparities were noted in the remaining two cases. In the small bowel, capsule endoscopy identified positive findings in 14 (70%) patients, whereas, push enteroscopy identified positive findings in 5 (25%) patients. Despite these results, the findings were definitive in only 6 of the 20 patients by using capsule endoscopy, and in two of 20 patients with push enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: When strict standards of interpretation were used, capsule endoscopy resulted in more positive findings than push enteroscopy, but the number of definitive findings for both imaging methods was low. There was a high degree of reliability between a novice and an experienced endoscopist with respect to the interpretation of capsule endoscopy.

Adult↗