Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colorectal Surgery”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

Prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery: the cost of ignoring the evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Three strategies are used to prevent complications in colorectal surgery: heparin and antibiotics given perioperatively and abdominal drains placed intraoperatively. To investigate the appropriate and inappropriate use of these prophylactic techniques and to assess the costs associated with their inappropriate use, we studied patients who underwent elective colorectal procedures. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 103 patients operated on between April and December 1999 at a 519-bed tertiary care, teaching hospital in Edmonton, Alta. The procedures carried out were elective sigmoid resection, low anterior resection, left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy and total or subtotal colectomy for benign or malignant conditions. The data collected included patient age and sex, diagnosis, the operating surgeon, and the housestaff or surgeon writing the pre- and postoperative orders. Patients who required emergency colorectal surgery were excluded from the study. Antibiotic, heparin and drain prophylaxis was assessed and considered appropriate if prescribed according to the evidence or inappropriate if prescribed when not recommended. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 98 patients had inappropriate heparin prophylaxis (5 of the 103 were excluded because they were already receiving heparin). Only 5 of 96 patients were treated appropriately with antibiotics preoperatively without postoperative doses (7 of the 103 were excluded due to intraoperative spillage with fecal contamination or an intra-abdominal abscess found intraoperatively); 95% of patients were inappropriately treated with antibiotics postoperatively. Half of all the patients had a drain inserted inappropriately for prophylaxis. On average, drains inserted inappropriately cost 30.40 dollars per patient, inappropriate antibiotic use cost 62.42 dollars per patient and inappropriate heparin use cost 89.30 dollars per patient. Preoperative orders were usually written by the staff surgeon, whereas postoperative orders were usually written by the resident or intern. CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable inappropriate use of heparin, antibiotic and drain prophylaxis. Considering the number of elective colorectal procedures performed annually, these inappropriately used strategies represent a substantial cost to the health care system. Improved education of surgeons and residents is needed to change to evidence-based practice habits.

Adult↗

Optimizing perioperative management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent developments in individual perioperative interventions in colorectal surgery, and progress in so-called fast-track or enhanced-recovery programmes. RECENT FINDINGS: A new survey from five northern European countries has revealed that best clinical practice in perioperative care, based on previously published high-grade evidence, is only partially in use in daily clinical practice. Recently, a number of trials contrasting clinical results in enhanced-recovery protocols versus traditional care clearly show that such protocols indeed enhance recovery, although effects on morbidity are less obvious. Further evidence supporting preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment, avoidance of oral bowel preparation and wound drainage in elective colonic surgery and avoidance of intraoperative fluid excess has emerged. The oral opioid antagonist alvimopan has recently been shown to limit postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis. The role of laparoscopic surgery in the era of enhanced-recovery programmes is unclear. SUMMARY: There is strong evidence on how to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery, but many interventions are not utilized in daily practice. Further evidence has emerged supporting several perioperative treatments, and successful experiences of enhanced-recovery programmes have now been reported from several centres.

Aged↗

Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in older patients.

The object of this study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients >60 years of age and compare it to a younger group of patients who underwent similar procedures. All consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted procedure were evaluated. The parameters analyzed included gender, indication for surgery, procedure, complications, conversions, length of ileus, length of hospitalization, and comorbidity. The results of patients 60 years of age or older were compared to a procedure-matched group of younger patients. Between August 1991 and August 1995, 165 patients underwent a laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted colorectal procedure. Thirty-six patients were 60 years of age or older [mean age, 73 (60-88) years; 17 males and 19 females] and were compared with 36 younger patients [mean age, 44 (20-58) years; 13 males and 23 females]. The indications for surgery included Crohn's disease in 14 patients, polyps in 23, diverticular disease in 15, carcinoma in 11, fecal incontinence in 4, rectal prolapse in 2, radiation proctitis in 2, and sigmoidocele in 1. Identical procedures were performed in each group including right colectomy or ileocolic resection in 17 patients, sigmoidectomy in 14, loop ileostomy in 3, loop colostomy in 1, and abdominoperineal resection in 1 patient. Fourteen patients (38%) in the elderly group had comorbid conditions including ischemic heart disease (3), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3), hypertension (2), chronic renal failure (2), atherosclerotic vascular disease (2), congestive heart failure (1), and diabetes (1). All patients were cleared for surgery by their respective specialists. There were no statistically significant differences between the younger and older groups relative to the incidence of complications (11 vs 14%, respectively) and conversion (8 vs 11%, respectively) or the length of ileus (2.8 vs 4.2 days, respectively) or hospitalization (5.2 vs 6.5 days, respectively) (P = NS for all). There was no mortality in either group. The outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in older patients is similar to that noted in younger patients. Advanced age should not be a contraindication to laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Adult↗

Value of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

A total of 169 patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly allocated to receive either gentamicin plus metronidazole or oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole as prophylaxis; they were also allocated to receive cover for 1 or 3 days. Twenty-eight patients (17 per cent) developed postoperative wound infections. The proportion of patients with wound infections and other infective complications was significantly less (P < 0.02) in those receiving oral ciprofloxacin. Cover for 3 days was no better than that for only 1 day. Oral ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis may offer advantages in efficacy and ease of administration compared with parenteral antibiotics.

Administration, Oral↗

Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Infective complications are often seen in colorectal surgery. These even occur in cases of elective surgery and in patients where adequate bowel preparation has been performed and is due to the very high numbers of bacteria colonising the bowel. Several controlled clinical studies showed that antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in preventing infective complications and the lack of prophylaxis is no longer justified. Antimicrobial prophylaxis can be oral (poorly absorbed antibiotics aimed to reduce the number of bacteria in the bowel) or systemic (aimed to reach a high tissue concentration when bacterial contamination occurs, in order to prevent colonisation) or a combination of the two. Which is to be preferred is still controversial. Systemic prophylaxis should have the following features: 1) use of a single agent with a broad spectrum of action, effective both on aerobes and anaerobes; 2) rapid I.V. administration, at the beginning of surgery; 3) good tissue penetration; 4) long half-life, in order to assure that the single dose will cover the whole duration of surgery; 5) good therapeutic ratio. The use of long half-life cephalosporins, particularly cefotetan, was shown to be highly beneficial. Prophylaxis can fail if contamination during surgery is severe, with a particularly high bacterial count. The degree of contamination of the operating field can be evaluated both by surgeon's judgment, and by tissue or peritoneal cavity lavage fluid sampling and culture. In case of severe contamination (bacterial number greater than 10(5) CFU/ml of fluid or mg of tissue) prolonging of antibiotic therapy for some days is justified. Otherwise, no evidence supports its prolongation beyond surgery.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Prevalence of anxiety among patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

To assess prevalence of anxiety 36 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery with general anesthesia were interviewed on the day of surgery and completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Postsurgical ratings of pain and anxiety were obtained within 24 hours after surgery. Analysis indicated that 29 scored moderate or higher on the State Anxiety scale prior to surgery. The correlations for scores on presurgical Trait Anxiety with postsurgical pain and Trait Anxiety scores were significant (p<.01) but not that for pre- and postsurgical State Anxiety

Adult↗

Does mechanical bowel preparation have a role in preventing postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery?

BACKGROUND: mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) consists of orthograde fluid preparation to clean the bowel. MBP is considered to prevent postoperative complications. METHODS: meta-analysis of prospective randomised clinical trials (RCT) evaluating MBP versus no MBP. RESULTS: following a medline search we retrieved 15 prospective trials of which only 5 where RCT comparing MBP versus no MBP in elective colorectal surgery. For the randomised studies, there were respectively 186, 179, 149, 267 and 380 patients, including all type of resections. The total number of patients in these 5 studies was 1144 (565 with MBP and 579 with no preparation). All patients received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Only one of these RCT show a significant decrease in anastomotic leak (AL), but among all the patients enrolled, AL is significantly more frequent in the group with MBP (Odds Ratio 1.8). Wound infection, re-operation and intra-abdominal abscess rates were more frequent in the MBP group but the difference did not reach statistical significance and the odds ratios for a 95% confidence interval were extremely large. CONCLUSION: there is limited evidence in the literature to support the use of MBP in patient undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Available data tend to suggest that MBP could be harmful with respect to the incidence of anastomotic leak. Moreover, MBP does not reduce the incidence of other infectious complications. Further RCTs are needed to establish an evidence-based rationale for the use of MBP in elective colorectal surgery.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Systemic interleukin-6 response to colorectal surgery originates from the bowel.

BACKGROUND: Surgical trauma evokes a systemic cytokine response which is enhanced in patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to locate the origin of the systemic cytokine response to colorectal surgery. METHODS: The concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were analysed in systemic and mesenteric venous blood in 12 patients operated on with colorectal resections due to cancer or benign lesions. Immunohistochemical staining and analysis of tissue concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in homogenates from tumours and benign specimens were performed. RESULTS: Mesenteric venous blood contained higher concentrations of IL-6 compared to systemic venous blood after resection, but not before. Tissue concentration of IL-6 was higher in the tumours compared to the benign specimens and immunohistochemistry revealed an abundance of IL-6 and TNF-alpha in malignant epithelium compared to benign mucosa. CONCLUSION: The higher concentration of IL-6 in venous blood from the mesenterium of the resected colonic segment compared to systemic levels, indicates that the bowel is the source of the IL-6 response to surgical trauma in colorectal surgery.

Aged↗

The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is evolving interest in auditing and credentialling the performance of surgeons. The incidence of anastomotic leakage has been proposed as a measure of performance following colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing resections of the colon and rectum. METHODS: A prospective database was developed for all patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Anastomotic leakage was defined prior to the commencement of the study. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of leakage. The variables analysed included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, anatomical location, pathology, emergency surgery, type of anastomosis, a covering stoma and radiotherapy. Significance was defined as the probability of a type 1 error of < 5%. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: There were 1598 patients who underwent 1639 anastomoses. Their mean age was 63 years, 34% of patients were ASA 3 or 4, and 16% of the operations were emergencies. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 2.4% (40/1639) of anastomoses. The leak rate for intraperitoneal anastomoses was 1.5% (19/1283) vs 6.6% for extraperitoneal anastomoses (21/316). Half of these leaks (20/40) were managed with re-operation or percutaneous drainage procedures. Ultra-low anterior resections were associated with the highest leak rate (8%, 18/225). A logistic regression analysis identified a covering stoma (P = 0.0001, OR 5.078, 95% CI 2.527-10.23) and diverticular disease (P = 0.037, OR 2.304, 95% CI 1.053-5.042) as independent predictors of a leak. CONCLUSIONS: Within this surgical unit, the incidence of leaks from intraabdominal anastomoses was relatively low. However, leaks in patients undergoing extraperitoneal anastomoses continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality.

Adolescent↗

Comparative analysis of two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis has greatly reduced the rate of postoperative infectious complications since its utilization in the elective colorectal surgery in the last several decades. Although the need of its application is indisputable, the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis is still on debate. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis with different duration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted of 190 patients that underwent elective surgery for colorectal carcinoma in the Clinic between January 1997 and June 2000. The patients were divided into two groups according to the regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis. Group 1 (n = 92) patients received a 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis and Group 2 (n = 98) had a prolonged antibiotic cover that lasted 5 days. The antibiotic prophylaxis was conducted with a third generation cefalosporin and metronidazole. RESULTS: Of all 190 patients 92 were in Group 1 and 98 in Group 2. Postoperative infectious wound complications were found in 14 (15.2%) patients from Group 1 and in 25 (25.5%) patients from Group 2. The difference did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show no advantage of the prolonged over short-term antibiotic prophylaxis. Based on the study findings the authors suggest that a 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis should be recommended for the lower rate of side effects and lower cost.

Adult↗

[Prevention of anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery].

Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of mortality in colorectal surgery. Some variables associated with a high-risk level for anastomotic leakage have been identified, including denutrition, obesity, smoking, level of the anastomoses, qualification of the surgeon. Several methods have been evaluated in order to prevent anastomotic leakage. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy has been recommended, but has no effect on the rate of anastomotic leakage. Optimal preoperative colonic preparation appears to be obtained with povidone iodine enemas associated with a low residue diet. Stapling gives better results than sutures only for difficult anastomoses. Colostomy does not prevent leakage but minimizes its consequences. Omentoplasty, peritoneal drainage, gastric tube, biofragmentable anastomotic ring, and Coloshield have demonstrated their efficacy.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

Does supplemental perioperative oxygen administration reduce the incidence of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery?

AIM: An association has been proposed between perioperative administration of 80% oxygen and a lower incidence of wound infection after colorectal surgery. The present study was conducted to assess this hypothesis. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (ASA classification 1 and 2) undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery were allocated at random to 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 19 patients who received an admixture of 80% oxygen and 20% nitrogen during anesthesia through an orotracheal tube and during the 2 first hours in the recovery room through a tight facemask with reservoir. Group 2 consisted of 19 patients who received an admixture of 70% nitrous oxide and 30% oxygen during anesthesia, followed by administration of 30% oxygen delivered by a blender through a tight facemask with reservoir in the same manner than group 1, during the first 2 hours in the recovery room. Wound infection was evaluated daily during hospital stay and after 7 days, 2 weeks, and 1 month. RESULTS: The incidence of wound infection was 12.5% in group 1 and 17.6% in group 2 (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed no reduction in the incidence of wound infection following elective colorectal surgery in patients receiving 80% oxygen during the perioperative period.

Aged↗

[Parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis or oral antimicrobial bowel preparation for colorectal surgery (author's transl)].

A prospective randomized trial was designed to establish whether parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis was as effective as oral antimicrobial bowel preparation in preventing sepsis after colorectal surgery. Patients scheduled for elective resection of colorectal cancer received metronidazole and kanamycin either orally in the preoperative phase or parenterally as a short-term perioperative prophylaxis. The former regimen resulted in reduction of the microbial concentrations in the bowel contents in the absence of therapeutic serum concentrations at the time of operation, whereas the latter achieved therapeutic intraoperative serum levels without altering the colonic microflora. 72 patients were studied. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative sepsis between the two groups (a total of 72 patients). These results differ from those obtained at the Birmingham General Hospital using the same protocol, in which postoperative sepsis was significantly more common in the group of patients having oral bowel preparation. This difference was most probably due to an overgrowth of kanamycin-resistant coliforms during the period of oral antibiotic preparation. The presence of resistant organisms did not, however, result in failure of systemic prophylaxis. The authors conclude that short-term parenteral application is the safer method of antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery and is to be preferred to oral antimicrobial bowel preparation.

Administration, Oral↗

A comparison of three different prophylactic parenteral antibiotic regimens in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.

A double-blind, prospective, randomized study was performed with 90 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, to ascertain the prophylactic effect of three different parenteral antibiotic programs. The patients were divided into three groups. The patients in group 1 received 80 mg Gentamycin and 600 mg Lincomycin intramuscularly, two hours preoperatively, and every eight hours postoperatively for three days. In group 2, the treatment was similar to group 1 but the Lincomycin was replaced by 600 mg Clindamycin. In Group 3, the treatment was also similar to group 1, but 500 mg Metronidazole given over 20 minutes replaced the Lincomycin. The present study, the first comparing three antianaerobic antibiotics and an aminoglycoside in the prophylaxis of infection in colorectal surgery, shows certain clinical and socioeconomic benefits, although not statistically significant to be found in the group 3 program (Gentamycin plus Metronidazole) as compared with the other programs. This advantage was no doubt due to the use of Metronidazole (used in group 3 only), because of its effectiveness against anaerobic bacteriae.

Adult↗

Colorectal surgery in the elderly: an audit of surgery in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality rates are higher in elderly compared to younger patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. This study was undertaken to see whether this finding applied to all colorectal surgery in the elderly and if so to try to identify the determining factors. METHODS: All patients undergoing colorectal surgery between 1975 and 1990 were entered into a computerized database. Patients were divided into two groups, those less than 80 years (< 80) and those 80 years and more (80+), and compared with regard to the type of surgery performed, the patient's race, the seniority of the surgeon, the patient's disease, the operation performed and the postoperative morbidity and mortality. In addition, patients undergoing major resectional surgery and patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were compared separately. RESULTS: Of 2011 admissions, 88 were for patients of 80+. The male to female admission rate was 1:0.79 in the < 80 group and 1:1.25 in the 80+ group. More surgical procedures were performed by consultants in older patients. More emergency admissions were for 80+ patients. Rectal, sigmoid and right colonic pathology was more common in the elderly. Very few elderly patients were admitted with minor anorectal problems. Rectal prolapse and colorectal cancer were the commonest causes for admission in octogenarians. There were more pulmonary and cardiovascular postoperative complications in 80+ patients. Urinary tract infections were also more common. The postoperative mortality rate was higher in older patients (7.9 vs 1.4%). Four hundred and sixty-two patients underwent major resectional surgery and 45 were 80+. Surgery for diverticular disease was more frequent in younger patients (13.4 vs 2.2%) and cancer surgery in older patients (93.3 vs 70.5%). The postoperative mortality rate was higher in the elderly (11.1 vs 3.6%). Three hundred and thirty-six major resections were for cancer and 42 were 80+. Emergency surgery was performed more commonly in the older group (38.1 vs 14.9%). The rate of advanced disease seemed to be similar in both groups. The postoperative death rate was higher in the elderly (11.9 vs 3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients were more likely to die from cardiopulmonary problems after surgical interventions than either from their primary disease or from the surgery undertaken for it. Good postoperative cardiopulmonary support should thus be provided for all such patients.

Aged↗

Anastomotic-vaginal fistula after colorectal surgery.

The most feared complication of anterior and low anterior resection is anastomotic dehiscence. Although most leakages remain clinically silent, some may lead to formation of a colovaginal fistula. At the Lahey Clinic Medical Center, the records of nine patients with colovaginal fistula as a complication of colorectal surgery were reviewed to determine clinical characteristics and optimal management. The mean age was 63.7 years (range, 47-72 years). The initial indications for surgery were carcinoma of the rectum (n = 4), diverticular disease (n = 3), and closure of the colostomy after Hartmann's procedure (n = 2). Hysterectomy had been performed earlier in seven patients (78 percent). The end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapling device was used in five patients, and four patients had a handsewn anastomosis. The fistula developed within 23 days after surgery and usually originated within 8 cm of the anal verge. Two patients underwent immediate diverting transverse colostomy. None of the seven patients who were initially managed medically had spontaneous closure of the fistula. High fistulas were successfully treated by colorectal resection in two patients, whereas low fistulas healed after transanal repair without colostomy in two patients. These results suggest that previous hysterectomy predisposes to development of a colovaginal fistula after colorectal surgery. Not all patients require fecal diversion. Colorectal resection for high fistulas and transanal repair for low fistulas appear to be viable options for treatment.

Aged↗

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland--where are we now?

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to gather information from the members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) to assess trends in the current practice of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey of the members of ACPGBI. RESULTS: The response rate was 37% (200/540). Only 45 surgeons currently perform laparoscopic colorectal work in Great Britain and Ireland mainly right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic stoma formation, of these about one third practiced laparoscopy for benign colorectal conditions only. The majority (68%) of surgeons had enough resources at their place of work, but further training seemed to be a major issue. Nearly 22% of surgeons had not had any formal training. Only 50% of surgeons trained their specialist registrars. The incidence of conversion rate was not different for benign or malignant conditions and also did not appear to be related to the duration of experience. Only four surgeons had noted port a site recurrence during the past 10 years. Seventy-five percent (150/200) felt that laparoscopic colorectal work could be carried out safely in a District General Hospital. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was being performed by a small minority of members of the ACPGBI although more surgeons had started to work in this field in recent years. The main areas of concern appeared to be a wide variation in the range of experience as indicated by the number of operations performed and limited formal training for consultants.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Technique for instant stapling of the sigmoid mesentery and mesorectum in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dissection of the mesentery of the distal sigmoid or rectum before transection with a linear stapler in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is time consuming, can cause irritating bleeding, and can harm the vascularization of the distal part of the bowel anastomosis. METHODS: A new linear stapling technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is presented. This technique is used to perform transection of the distal sigmoid or proximal rectum with a linear stapler by instant stapling of both the mesentery/mesorectal fat and the intestine instead of standard preliminary dissection. This technique was performed in a pilot study of 27 laparoscopic colorectal operations for benign or malignant disease. RESULTS: In none of the 27 patients was leakage of the anastomosis observed. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique is safe and effective. It saves time, avoids troublesome dissection of the mesentery/mesorectum, which can cause bleeding or damage to the bowel, and preserves vascularization of the distal part of the anastomosis.

Adult↗