Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chimpanzees”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Virologic and serologic characteristics of a natural chimpanzee lentivirus infection.

This study set out to characterize the unique features of natural lentivirus infection in chimpanzees over time. The virologic and serologic characteristics of this infection were followed longitudinally in a naturally infected chimpanzee together with a small cohort of experimentally HIV-1-infected chimpanzees. The subsequent isolates from the naturally infected chimpanzee were all non-syncytium forming (NSI) versus syncytium forming in the experimentally infected animals. In contrast to HIV-1-infected chimpanzees virus load was higher and plasma viremia occurred but in a cyclic pattern. Serologic follow-up suggested the development of neutralizing antibodies with subsequent escape of new isolates. Interestingly, the sequence of the principal neutralizing (V3 loop) domain (of HIV-1) remained constant over time. Antibodies to peptides from the V3 loop were type specific. The occurrence of persistent, fluctuating plasma viremia and NSI-type virus variants of this natural lentivirus infection are unique characteristics not previously reported in experimentally infected chimpanzees.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1976

The nonhuman primates as models for studying human atherosclerosis: studies on the chimpanzee, the baboon and the rhesus macacus.

There is no dearth of experimental techniques for producing the hyperlipoproteinemia resulting in atherosclerotic complications and for myocardial infarction in the non human primates. Most of the recent experiments which have given information of great value have been studied with relatively expensive animals for a long period of time up to 6-7 years. It is evident that no animal model perfectly duplicates the human disease or satisfies all desirable requirements. The chimpanzees, representatives of the New World monkeys, have circulating plasma lipoproteins identical to man in composition as well as in function. The results reported above indicate that the compositional changes of chimpanzee plasma lipoproteins in response to dietary changes reflect the appearance of type II and type IV hyperlipoproteinemia similar to the human disease. Moreover, there are more indications about the existence of genotype II a in the chimpanzee, and also on the influence of stress on the plasma lipids, so that the developed intimal lesions similar to the human pathology are in this sense multifactorially influenced. From a phylogenetic point of view the chimpanzee is closer to man than any other non human primate. Furthermore, the chimpanzee lipoproteins are useful models for understanding the relationship between function and structure of the plasma lipoproteins in health and disease. Baboon and rhesus monkeys show similar results, but more differences to the human lipoproteins in health and disease were observed. At present it appears that the most useful models of human atherosclerosis are those induced in the non human primates, especially in the chimpanzee.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

The chimpanzee major histocompatibility complex class II DR subregion contains an unexpectedly high number of beta-chain genes.

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II DR subregion of the chimpanzee was studied by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Genomic DNA obtained from a panel of 94 chimpanzees was digested with the restriction enzyme Taq I and hybridized with an HLA-DR beta probe specific for the 3' untranslated (UT) region. Such a screening revealed the existence of 14 distinct DRB/Taq I gene-associated fragments allowing the definition of 11 haplotypes. Segregation studies proved that the number of chimpanzee class II DRB/Taq I fragments is not constant and varies from three to six depending on the haplotype. Comparison of these data with a human reference panel manifested that some MHC DRB/Taq I fragments are shared by man and chimpanzee. Moreover, the number of HLA-DRB/Taq I gene-associated fragments detected in a panel of homozygous typing cells varies from one to three and corresponds with the number of HLA-DRB genes present for most haplotypes. However, a discrepancy is observed for the HLA-DR4, -DR7, and -DR9 haplotypes since a fourth HLA-DRB pseudogene present within these haplotypes lacks its 3' UT region and thus is not detected with the probe used. These results suggest that chimpanzees have a higher maximum number of DRB genes per haplotype than man. As a consequence, some chimpanzee haplotypes must show a dissimilar organization of the MHC DR subregion compared to their human equivalents. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of the trans-species theory of MHC polymorphism.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Trans-species evolution of Mhc-DRB haplotype polymorphism in primates: organization of DRB genes in the chimpanzee.

The DRB region of the human major histocompatibility complex displays length polymorphism: Five major haplotypes differing in the number and type of genes they contain have been identified, each at appreciable frequency. In an attempt to determine whether this haplotype polymorphism, like the allelic polymorphism, predates the divergence of humans from great apes, we have worked out the organization of the DRB region of the chimpanzee Hugo using a combination of chromosome walking, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and sequencing. Hugo is a DRB homozygote whose single DRB haplotype is some 440 kilobases (kb) long and contains five genes. At least one and possibly two of these are pseudogenes, while three are presumably active genes. The genes are designated DRB*A0201, DRB2*0101, DRB3*0201, DRB6*0105, and DRB5*0301, and are arranged in this order on the chromosome. The DRB2 and DRB3 genes are separated by approximately 250 kb of sequence that does not seem to contain any additional DRB genes. The DRB*A0201 gene is related to the DRB1 gene of the human DR2 haplotype; the DRB2*0101 and DRB3*0201 genes are related to the DRB2 and DRB3 genes of the human DR3 haplotype, respectively; the DRB6*0105 and DRB5*0301 genes are related to the DRBVI and DRB5 genes of the human DR2 haplotype, respectively. Thus the Hugo haplotype appears to correspond to the entire human DR2 haplotype, into which a region representing a portion of the human DR3 haplotype has been inserted. Since other chimpanzees have their DRB regions organized in different ways, we conclude that, first, the chimpanzee DRB region, like the human DRB region, displays length polymorphism; second, some chimpanzee DRB haplotypes are longer than the longest known human DRB haplotypes; third, in some chimpanzee haplotypes at least, the DRB genes occur in combinations different from those of the human haplotypes; fourth, and most importantly, certain DRB gene combinations have been conserved in the evolution of chimpanzees and humans from their common ancestors. These data thus provide evidence that not only allelic but also haplotype polymorphism can be passed on from one species to another in a given evolutionary lineage.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Mhc-DRB diversity of the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Fifty-four chimpanzee Patr-DRB and five human HLA-DRB second exons were cloned and sequenced from thirty-five chimpanzees and four human B-cell lines and compared with known Mhc-DRB sequences of these two species. Equivalents of the HLA-DRB1*02, -DRB1*03, -DRB1*07 allelic lineages and the HLA-DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DRB6, and -DRB7 loci were all found in the chimpanzee. In addition, two chimpanzee Patr-DRB lineages (Patr-DRBX and -DRBY) were found for which no human counterparts have been described. None of the Patr-DRB sequences is identical to known HLA-DRB sequences. The Patr-DRB1*0702 and HLA-DRB1*0701 alleles are the most similar sequences in a comparison between the two species and differ by only two nucleotides out of 246 sequenced. Equivalents of the HLA-DRB1*01, -DRB1*04, and -DRB1*09 alleles were not found in our sample of chimpanzees. A per locus comparison of the number of Patr-DRB alleles with the HLA-DRB alleles shows that the Patr-DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, and -DRB6 locus are, thus far, more polymorphic than their human homologs. The polymorphism of the Patr-DRB1 locus seems to be less extensive than that reported for the HLA-DRB1 locus. Nevertheless, the Patr-DRB1 locus seems to be the most polymorphic of the Patr-DRB loci. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that the HLA-DRB1*09 allele may have originated from a recombination between a Mhc-DRB5 allele and the DRB1 allele of a Mhc-DR7 haplotype. Although recombination seems to increase the diversity of the Patr-DRB alleles, its contribution to the generation of Patr-DRB variation is probably low. Hence, most Patr-DRB diversity presumably accumulated via recurrent point mutations. Finally, two distinct Patr-DRB haplotypes are deduced, one of which (the chimpanzee equivalent of the HLA-DR7 haplotype) is probably older than 6-8 million years.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Trans-species origin of Mhc-DRB polymorphism in the chimpanzee.

Trans-specific evolution of allelic polymorphism at the major histocompatibility complex loci has been demonstrated in a number of species. Estimating the substitution rates and the age of trans-specifically evolving alleles requires detailed information about the alleles in related species. We provide such information for the chimpanzee DRB genes. DNA fragments encompassing exon 2 were amplified in vitro from genomic DNA of ten chimpanzees. The nucleotide sequences were determined and their relationship to the human DRB alleles was evaluated. The alleles were classified according to their position in dendrograms and the presence of lineage-specific motifs. Twenty alleles were found at the expressed loci Patr-DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, and at the pseudogenes Patr-DRB6, -DRB7; of these, 13 are new alleles. Two other chimpanzee sequences were classified as members of a new lineage tentatively designated DRBX. Chimpanzee counterparts of HLA-DRB1*01 and *04 were not detected. The number of alleles found at individual loci indicates asymmetrical distribution of polymorphism between humans and chimpanzees. Estimations of intra-lineage divergence times suggest that the lineages are more than 30 million years old. Predictions of major chimpanzee DRB haplotypes are made.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Behavioral seasonality in Mahale chimpanzees.

To analyze how the chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania, change their grouping pattern, activity budget, travel speed, and travel distance within an annual cycle, I divided 1-year data into four periods. The Mahale chimpanzees have the behavioral flexibility to adapt to various climates and exhibited at least three behavioral seasons. In the early wet season, chimpanzees formed a few, large parties, and spent much time feeding on insects and animal meat. In the early and late dry seasons, chimpanzees maintained party sizes as large as in the early wet season, and traveled distances similar to the early wet season, but spent the most time feeding and traveling within the year. By contrast, in the late wet season chimpanzee parties broke up into more numerous, small groups, and traveled slowly over shorter distances. Although time spent feeding and traveling were the same as that in the early wet season, time spent feeding on terrestrial herbaceous vegetation (THV) was the highest in the year. The results suggest that chimpanzees travel longer, faster, and farther in seasons when they form large parties.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Characterization of chimpanzee TCRV gene polymorphism: how old are human TCRV alleles?

The functional relevance of the majority of human T-cell receptor A and B variable region gene polymorphisms is controversial. Studies of human and nonhuman primate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II polymorphisms show that allelic lineages predate human speciation and indicate that selection favors the long-term maintenance of these advantageous mutations. We investigated at the DNA level whether 15 human TCRA and B polymorphisms exist in contemporary chimpanzee populations. Polymorphisms consisted of variable region replacements, a recombination signal sequence base change, and silent mutations. With one exception, none of these human TCR polymorphisms were observed in contemporary chimpanzees. Investigation of the same polymorphisms in a range of other nonhuman primates showed little evidence of the existence of human polymorphism prespeciation. Chimpanzee TCRAV and BV regions were however polymorphic for variation so far not observed in human groups. Levels of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence variation in contemporary chimpanzees suggest that population bottlenecks have not been a feature of chimpanzee evolution and it is therefore probable that most human TCR polymorphisms have evolved in the estimated five million years since the speciation of human and chimpanzees. Thus, over the evolutionary time period studied, ancient TCRA and B polymorphisms have not been maintained by selection to the same degree as postulated for MHC polymorphisms.

Alleles↗
PubMed2005

Molecular characterisation of the pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 5 from the homologous chimpanzee chromosome.

Human and chimpanzee karyotypes differ by virtue of nine pericentric inversions that serve to distinguish human chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 from their chimpanzee orthologues. In this study, we have analysed the breakpoints of the pericentric inversion characteristic of chimpanzee chromosome 4, the homologue of human chromosome 5. Breakpoint-spanning BAC clones were identified from both the human and chimpanzee genomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, and the precise locations of the breakpoints were determined by sequence comparisons. In stark contrast to some other characterised evolutionary rearrangements in primates, this chimpanzee-specific inversion appears not to have been mediated by either gross segmental duplications or low-copy repeats, although micro-duplications were found adjacent to the breakpoints. However, alternating purine-pyrimidine (RY) tracts were detected at the breakpoints, and such sequences are known to adopt non-B DNA conformations that are capable of triggering DNA breakage and genomic rearrangements. Comparison of the breakpoint region of human chromosome 5q15 with the orthologous regions of the chicken, mouse, and rat genomes, revealed similar but non-identical syntenic disruptions in all three species. The clustering of evolutionary breakpoints within this chromosomal region, together with the presence of multiple pathological breakpoints in the vicinity of both 5p15 and 5q15, is consistent with the non-random model of chromosomal evolution and suggests that these regions may well possess intrinsic features that have served to mediate a variety of genomic rearrangements, including the pericentric inversion in chimpanzee chromosome 4.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of early events during infection of human and chimpanzee peripheral blood mononuclear cells with HIV-1.

Differences in early events during entry and integration of HIV-1 into peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) might contribute to the absence of AIDS-like disease in chimpanzees as compared to humans. To address this question, we first tested the in vitro susceptibility of human and chimpanzee PBMC for infection with the two HIV-1 isolates III B and RF. The results of these studies revealed that chimpanzee PBMC had a slightly lower capability to support the growth of HIV-1 as compared to human PBMC. This was accompanied by a delayed accumulation of proviral HIV-1 DNA in cultures of HIV-1-infected chimpanzee PBMC. However, no differences between cells of the two species were observed when very early events of HIV-1 infection were studied. Shortly (20 h) after infection chimpanzee and human cells harbored similar amounts of proviral HIV-1 DNA and PBMC of both species behaved comparably with respect to pre-integration latency (i.e. the ability to activate extrachromosomal HIV-1 intermediates in HIV-1 infected quiescent cells at various times after infection). These results strongly suggest that the absence of AIDS-like disease in chimpanzees cannot be correlated with defects in early events of the HIV-1 replicative cycle.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Cognitive development in object manipulation by infant chimpanzees.

This study focuses on the development of spontaneous object manipulation in three infant chimpanzees during their first 2 years of life. The three infants were raised by their biological mothers who lived among a group of chimpanzees. A human tester conducted a series of cognitive tests in a triadic situation where mothers collaborated with the researcher during the testing of the infants. Four tasks were presented, taken from normative studies of cognitive development of Japanese infants: inserting objects into corresponding holes in a box, seriating nesting cups, inserting variously shaped objects into corresponding holes in a template, and stacking up wooden blocks. The mothers had already acquired skills to perform these manipulation tasks. The infants were free to observe the mothers' manipulative behavior from immediately after birth. We focused on object-object combinations that were made spontaneously by the infant chimpanzees, without providing food reinforcement for any specific behavior that the infants performed. The three main findings can be summarized as follows. First, there was precocious appearance of object-object combination in infant chimpanzees: the age of onset (8-11 months) was comparable to that in humans (around 10 months old). Second, object-object combinations in chimpanzees remained at a low frequency between 11 and 16 months, then increased dramatically at the age of approximately 1.5 years. At the same time, the accuracy of these object-object combinations also increased. Third, chimpanzee infants showed inserting behavior frequently and from an early age but they did not exhibit stacking behavior during their first 2 years of life, in clear contrast to human data.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Finger drawing by infant chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes).

We introduced a new technique to investigate the development of scribbling in very young infants. We tested three infant chimpanzees to compare the developmental processes of scribbling between humans and chimpanzees. While human infants start to scribble on paper at around the age of 18 months, our 13- to 23-month-old infant chimpanzees had never been observed scribbling prior to this study. We used a notebook computer with a touch-sensitive screen. This apparatus was able to record the location of the subjects' touches on the screen. Each touch generated a fingertip-sized dot at the corresponding on-screen location. During spontaneous interactions with this apparatus, all three infants and two mother chimpanzees left scribbles with their fingers on the screen. The scribbles contained not only simple dots or short lines, but also curves and hook-like lines or loops, most of which were observed in the instrumental drawings of adult chimpanzees. The results suggest that perceptual-motor control for finger drawing develops in infant chimpanzees. Two of the infants performed their first scribble with a marker on paper at the age of 20-23 months. Just prior to this, they showed a rapid increase in combinatory manipulation of objects. These findings suggest that the development of combinatory manipulation of objects as well as that of perceptual-motor control may be necessary for the emergence of instrumental drawing on paper.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Imitation recognition in a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

This study investigated the ability of a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) to recognise when he is being imitated. In the experimental condition of test 1a, an experimenter imitated the postures and behaviours of the chimpanzee as they were being displayed. In three control conditions the same experimenter exhibited (1) actions that were contingent on, but different from, the actions of the chimpanzee, (2) actions that were not contingent on, and different from, the actions of the chimpanzee, or (3) no action at all. The chimpanzee showed more "testing" sequences (i.e., systematically varying his actions while oriented to the imitating experimenter) and more repetitive behaviour when he was being imitated, than when he was not. This finding was replicated 4 months later in test 1b. When the experimenter repeated the same actions she displayed in the experimental condition of test 1a back to the chimpanzee in test 2, these actions now did not elicit those same testing sequences or repetitive behaviours. However, a live imitation condition did. Together these results provide the first evidence of imitation recognition in a nonhuman animal.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) intentional communication is not contingent upon food.

Studies of great apes have revealed that they use manual gestures and other signals to communicate about distal objects. There is also evidence that chimpanzees modify the types of communicative signals they use depending on the attentional state of a human communicative partner. The majority of previous studies have involved chimpanzees requesting food items from a human experimenter. Here, these same communicative behaviors are reported in chimpanzees requesting a tool from a human observer. In this study, captive chimpanzees were found to gesture, vocalize, and display more often when the experimenter had a tool than when she did not. It was also found that chimpanzees responded differentially based on the attentional state of a human experimenter, and when given the wrong tool persisted in their communicative efforts. Implications for the referential and intentional nature of chimpanzee communicative signaling are discussed.

Animal Communication↗
PubMed2005

Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans.

This paper tests the proposal that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans have similar rates of death from intraspecific aggression, whereas chimpanzees have higher rates of non-lethal physical attack (Boehm 1999, Hierarchy in the forest: the evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press). First, we assembled data on lethal aggression from long-term studies of nine communities of chimpanzees living in five populations. We calculated rates of death from intraspecific aggression both within and between communities. Variation among communities in mortality rates from aggression was high, and rates of death from intercommunity and intracommunity aggression were not correlated. Estimates for average rates of lethal violence for chimpanzees proved to be similar to average rates for subsistence societies of hunter-gatherers and farmers. Second, we compared rates of non-lethal physical aggression for two populations of chimpanzees and one population of recently settled hunter-gatherers. Chimpanzees had rates of aggression between two and three orders of magnitude higher than humans. These preliminary data support Boehm's hypothesis.

Aggression↗
PubMed2005

Is the chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes, an endangered species? It depends on what "endangered" means.

I review information on the status in the wild of the robust chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes, and consider whether this evidence is consistent with the designation of P. troglodytes as Endangered in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List, and with public statements to the effect that great apes as a whole will be extinct within a few decades. Chimpanzees remain widespread in tropical Africa, occurring in a variety of forested habitats. Estimates of total surviving numbers have increased from about 200,000 in the 1980s to a maximum of almost 300,000 in 2003. However, this apparent increase comes about from new survey data, rather than representing a measured increase in actual population numbers. Infectious disease decimated several chimpanzee populations during the 1990s, and data from parts of Gabon, extrapolated to that country as a whole, suggest a major decline in great ape populations caused by disease and hunting. However, accurate data on population numbers are absent for the majority of wild chimpanzee populations. I found reports of the presence of Pan troglodytes in at least 51 national parks in at least 19 countries; some of these parks have been established very recently. Chimpanzees also occur in many non-park conservation areas. A set of large, well-protected parks could safeguard chimpanzees for the foreseeable future. Although many African parks do not function well at present, mechanisms to improve their function are understood and available. By a strict application of IUCN threat criteria, P. troglodytes can be considered Endangered, based on estimated rates of past decline and on the species' long generation time. Relatively speaking, however, P. troglodytes is less endangered than are orangutans or gorillas, and the species is unlikely to go extinct by the year 2100, especially if existing conservation measures improve. The IUCN threat-rating system has become overly complex; the system can produce results that do not accord with common sense and these results must therefore be interpreted with care.

Africa↗
PubMed1995

The chimpanzee alpha-fetoprotein-encoding gene shows structural similarity to that of gorilla but distinct differences from that of human.

The chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-encoding gene (AFP) spans 18,867 bp from the transcription start point to the polyadenylation site, and the nucleotide (nt) sequence reveals that the gene is composed of 15 exons, which are symmetrically placed within three domains of AFP. In addition, we report 3121 bp of 5'-flanking sequence and 4886 bp of 3'-flanking sequence. The entire 26,874 bp of contiguous DNA reported here was determined from three overlapping lambda phage clones. The deduced polypeptide chain is composed of a 19-amino-acid (aa) putative leader peptide, followed by 590 aa of the mature protein. The sequence of chimpanzee AFP was compared with those of the previously published human AFP [Gibbs et al., Biochemistry 26 (1987) 1332-1343] and gorilla AFP [Ryan et al., Genomics 9 (1991) 60-72]. At the aa level, the human AFP differs from the chimpanzee at 6 aa positions and from the gorilla at 4 aa positions; the chimpanzee and gorilla differ at 8 aa positions. There are four types of repetitive sequence elements (X, Alu, Xba and Kpn) in the introns and flanking regions of chimpanzee AFP, and they are located in orthologous positions in the human and gorilla AFP. However, one specific Alu and one Xba repeat in introns 4 and 7, respectively, found in human AFP, are absent from orthologous positions in chimpanzee and gorilla AFP. These two repeats represent human-specific novelties that arose from recent DNA transpositions in primate phylogeny.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Different evolutionary fates of recently integrated human and chimpanzee LINE-1 retrotransposons.

The long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) is a highly successful retrotransposon in mammals. L1 elements have continued to actively propagate subsequent to the human-chimpanzee divergence, approximately 6 million years ago, resulting in species-specific inserts. Here, we report a detailed characterization of chimpanzee-specific L1 subfamily diversity and a comparison with their human-specific counterparts. Our results indicate that L1 elements have experienced different evolutionary fates in humans and chimpanzees within the past approximately 6 million years. Although the species-specific L1 copy numbers are on the same order in both species (1200-2000 copies), the number of retrotransposition-competent elements appears to be much higher in the human genome than in the chimpanzee genome. Also, while human L1 subfamilies belong to the same lineage, we identified two lineages of recently integrated L1 subfamilies in the chimpanzee genome. The two lineages seem to have coexisted for several million years, but only one shows evidence of expansion within the past three million years. These differential evolutionary paths may be the result of random variation, or the product of competition between L1 subfamily lineages. Our results suggest that the coexistence of several L1 subfamily lineages within a species may be resolved in a very short evolutionary period of time, perhaps in just a few million years. Therefore, the chimpanzee genome constitutes an excellent model in which to analyze the evolutionary dynamics of L1 retrotransposons.

5' Untranslated Regions↗