[Anti IL-2 receptor antibody--basiliximab].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Basiliximab”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Safe administration of a humanized murine antibody after anaphylaxis to a chimeric murine antibody.
BACKGROUND: Basiliximab and daclizumab are potent and relatively safe immunosuppressive induction agents used in transplantation. These chimeric or humanized monoclonal antibodies, respectively, act by binding to the alpha chain of interleukin-2 receptors on activated T lymphocytes. Herein, the authors describe successful transplant induction therapy with a humanized murine antibody in a patient with a history of anaphylaxis to a chimeric murine antibody. METHODS: The authors report a 42-year-old woman who received a dose of basiliximab without adverse reaction before an anticipated renal transplant that was canceled. Two weeks later, she received a second dose of basiliximab. Within 10 min of receiving the second dose, she developed chest tightness, shortness of breath, tongue swelling, diffuse pruritic rash, and skin flushing. RESULTS: The authors hypothesized that her anaphylaxis was mediated by immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibodies to basiliximab. Consistent with this hypothesis, intradermal administration of a 1:100 dilution of basiliximab induced a 10 x 10-mm flare. The authors sought to find an alternative immunosuppressive agent for this patient. The patient elicited prick and intradermal skin testing responses to horse and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte antibody preparations. However, she mounted neither a prick nor an intradermal response to daclizumab. The patient was administered daclizumab without any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The negative skin test and safe administration of daclizumab is surprising because the similarity of these hybrid antibodies would have predicted similar IgE responsiveness and clinical outcome. The authors propose that patients who develop anaphylaxis to basiliximab or other chimeric antibodies may be candidates for treatment with a humanized antibody preparation such as daclizumab in the presence of a negative skin test to the humanized agent.
Adult↗
A systematic review and economic model of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children.
OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) and sirolimus as possible immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplantation in children. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched up to November 2004. REVIEW METHODS: Data from selected studies were extracted and quality assessed. An economic model [Birmingham Sensitivity Analysis paediatrics (BSAp)] was produced based on an adaptation of a model previously developed for the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressants in adults following renal transplant. RESULTS: For the addition of basiliximab, one unpublished paediatric randomised control trial (RCT), reported that the addition of basiliximab to tacrolimus-based triple therapy (BTAS) failed to significantly improve 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft function, graft loss and all-cause mortality. No significant difference between groups was seen in 6-month or 1-year or longer graft loss, all-cause mortality and side-effects. In a meta-analysis of adult RCTs, the addition of basiliximab to a ciclosporin, azathioprine and steroid regimen (CAS) significantly reduced short-term BPAR. There was no significant difference in short- or long-term graft loss, all-cause mortality or side-effects. One adult RCT was included for the addition of daclizumab to CAS, which reported reduced 1-year BPAR, although no difference between groups was seen in either 1- or 3-year graft loss, all-cause mortality and side-effects. For tacrolimus versus ciclosporin, one unpublished paediatric RCT found that a regimen of tacrolimus, azathioprine and a steroid (TAS) reduced 6-month BPAR and improved graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] compared with CAS. This improvement in BPAR with tacrolimus was as shown in the meta-analysis of adult RCTs. There was evidence, particularly in children, that in comparison with ciclosporin, tacrolimus may reduce long-term graft loss, although there is no benefit on total mortality. The total level of withdrawal in children was reduced in children receiving tacrolimus. Adult RCTs showed an increase in post-transplant diabetes mellitus with tacrolimus. For MMF versus azathioprine, a meta-analysis of adult RCTs showed MMF [regimen of ciclosporin, MMF and a steroid (CMS)] to reduce 1-year BPAR compared with azathioprine (CAS). There was evidence, particularly in children, that in comparison with azathioprine, tacrolimus may reduce long-term graft loss, although there is no benefit on total mortality. There was an increase in the level of cytomegalovirus infection with MMF, although the overall level of withdrawal due to adverse events was not different to that of azathioprine-treated adults. No study comparing MPS with azathioprine (CAS) was identified. In an adult RCT comparing MMF with MPS, there was no significant difference between groups in 1-year efficacy or side-effects. One unpublished paediatric RCT assessed the addition of sirolimus to CAS. BPAR, graft loss and all-cause mortality were not reported. In two adult RCTs, compared with azathioprine, sirolimus reduced 1-year BPAR, reduced graft function (as assessed by an increased serum creatinine) and increased the level of hyperlipidaemia. No significant differences were seen in other efficacy and side-effect outcomes. On an adult RCT comparing sirolimus with ciclosporin, there were no significant differences between groups in 1-year efficacy or side-effects with the exception of an increased level of hyperlipidaemia with sirolimus substitution. Both the assessment group and drug companies assessed the cost-effectiveness of the newer renal immunosuppressants currently licensed in children using an adaptation (BSAp) of the Birmingham Sensitivity Analysis (BSA) model. This model is based on a 10-year extrapolation of 1-year BPAR results sourced from paediatric RCTs or adult RCTs (where paediatric RCTs were not available). The addition of basiliximab and that of daclizumab to CAS was found to increase quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and decreased overall costs, a finding that was robust to sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of replacing ciclosporin with tacrolimus was highly sensitive to the selection of the hazard ratio for graft loss from acute rejection, dialysis costs and the incorporation (or not) of side-effects. The ICERs for tacrolimus versus ciclosporin ranged from about 46,000 pounds/QALY to about 146,000 pounds/QALY. Although sensitive to varying the hazard ratio for graft loss with acute rejection, the ICER for replacing azathioprine with MMF remained in excess of 55,000 pounds/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: In general, compared with a regimen of ciclosporin, azathioprine and steroid, the newer immunosuppressive agents consistently reduced the incidence of short-term biopsy-proven acute rejection. However, evidence of the impact on side-effects, long-term graft loss, compliance and overall health-related quality of life is limited. Cost-effectiveness was estimated based on the relationship between short-term acute rejection levels from RCTs and long-term graft loss. Both the addition of daclizumab and that of basiliximab were found to be dominant strategies, that is, regarding cost savings and increased QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus relative to ciclosporin was highly sensitive to key model parameter values and therefore may well be a cost-effective strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness of MMF compared with azathioprine, although also sensitive to model parameter, was unattractive. There is a particular need for RCTs to assess the use of MMF, MPS and daclizumab for renal transplantation in children where no such evidence currently exists. Future comparative studies need to report not only on the impact of the newer immunosuppressants on short- and long-term clinical outcomes but also on side-effects, compliance, healthcare resource, costs and health-related quality of life.
Child↗
A safe immunosuppressive protocol in adult-to-adult living related liver transplantation.
BACKGROUND: In this series of 32 adult-to-adult living related liver transplantations, we assessed the efficacy and safety of basiliximab in combination with a tacrolimus-based regimen. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor (CD25), has been extensively evaluated as induction therapy for cadaveric liver transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two adult-to-adult living related liver transplantations were performed in the last 3 years. All patients received two 20 mg doses of basiliximab (days 0 and 4 posttransplantation) followed by tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg/d; 10-15 ng/mL target trough levels) and steroids (starting with 20 mg IV switched to PO as soon as the patient was able to eat and weaned within 1-2 months). The average follow-up was 395 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Of the patients, 93.75% remained rejection-free during follow-up with an actuarial rejection-free probability of 92.59% within 3 months. Two patients (6%) had one episode of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (ACR). Actuarial patient and graft survival rates at 3 years were 86.85% and 81.25%. One patient (3%) experienced one episode of sepsis. There was no evidence of cytomegalovirus infections or side effects related to the basiliximab. We found zero de novo malignancy but we observed two patients with metastatic spread of their primary malignancy during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids is effective as prophylaxis of ACR among adult living related liver transplant recipients.
Adolescent↗
Humanized anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody for prophylaxis of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) in haploidentical bone marrow transplantation without ex vivo T-cell depletion.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a novel anti-IL-2 receptor (CD25) monoclonal antibody, basiliximab, on graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and engraftment in haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive high-risk leukemia patients (age 9-41) underwent haploidentical BMT with G-CSF-primed marrow as stem cells without ex vivo T-cell depletion. Basiliximab, along with a combination of cyclosporine (CSA), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), was used for GVHD prophylaxis. Immunophenotyping, limited-dilution assay, and colony-forming assays were used to measure the effect of basiliximab on the subsets of lymphocytes, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursors (CTLp), and hematopoietic cells. RESULTS: All patients established successful trilineage engraftment with full donor chimerism. No patients developed grade II-IV acute GVHD. Patients who survived more than 12 months and were free of relapse showed limited chronic skin GVHD. Ten of 13 patients are currently alive with a Karnofsky performance score of 100% at median follow-up of 17 months (range 12-24 months). Basiliximab significantly decreased alloreactive CTLp by 10-fold to 100-fold in limiting-dilution assays. It had no effect on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as determined by in vitro colony-forming assays. CONCLUSION: The addition of basiliximab to CSA, MMF, and MTX as GVHD prophylaxis effectively reduced severe lethal GVHD in haploidentical BMT. It is possible to selectively eliminate or reduce the number of alloreactive T cells with anti-CD25 antibody, which results in prevention of or a reduction in the severity of GVHD.
Adolescent↗
Inhibition of the IL-15 pathway in anti-CD25 mAb treated renal allograft recipients.
Anti-CD25 mAb's are used for prophylaxis of rejection in allograft transplantation. These agents target the alpha-chain, part of the IL-2Ralphabetagamma complex. The beta- and gamma-chain are signaling components that are not specific for IL-2. The T-cell growth factors IL2, IL-7 and IL-15 utilize the gamma-chain and IL-2 and IL-15 share the beta-chain. We have studied the consequences of targeting the IL-2R alpha-chain with the anti-CD25 mAb basiliximab by measuring the IL-2R alphabetagamma expression levels and the IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15 driven proliferation. By flowcytometry and limiting dilution analysis, the IL-2R complex was analyzed in peripheral blood samples from renal allograft recipients (n = 29) who received basiliximab (20 mg IV bolus on day 0 and 4), cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. In peripheral blood, after induction therapy with basiliximab, no CD25 positive T-cells were detectable for 61 days (median, range 25-93 days). When CD25 cells were covered with basiliximab, the percentage and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IL-2Rbeta positive T-cells significantly decreased, P = 0.02 and P = 0.013, respectively, whereas the expression level of the IL-2Rgamma was not affected. The inhibition of the expression of the IL-2R alpha- and beta-chain had significant consequences for the function of these cells. Both the IL-2- and the IL-15-dependent proliferation were inhibited, P = 0.007 and P = 0.01, respectively. The control, the IL-7 driven proliferation, was not influenced by basiliximab. In conclusion, therapy with anti-CD25 mAb's affect T-cell-dependent allogeneic immune responses, not only by blocking IL-2 signaling but also by impairing IL-15 signaling through downregulating the IL-2/IL-15 receptor beta-chain.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in transplantation: what is the basis for choice?
Two monoclonal antibody preparations against the alpha-chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha) are available for use, basiliximab and daclizumab, a chimeric and a humanised antibody, respectively. The first clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these agents as induction therapy to reduce the rate of acute rejection after organ transplantation. Basiliximab and daclizumab have a similar effect on prevention of acute rejection. Likewise, incidence of infections and malignancies are not different between the two treatment options. Anti-IL-2Ralpha therapy was very well tolerated in clinical trials. Phase III studies with basiliximab have been undertaken with a two-dose regimen, consisting of two doses of 20mg, in an attempt to saturate the IL-2Ralpha on peripheral blood T lymphocytes for an average of 4-6 weeks. In contrast, the daclizumab dose is corrected for bodyweight and the goal is to achieve IL-2Ralpha blockade for 12 weeks. Phase III efficacy trials with daclizumab have, therefore, been developed with five doses of 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the first 2 months after transplantation. Whether or not it is a benefit to have blockade of the IL-2Ralpha for 10-12 weeks (daclizumab) compared with 4-6 weeks (basiliximab) remains unknown. Assuming 4-6 weeks would be sufficient for prevention of acute rejection, many centres have changed the protocol of daclizumab administration to two doses, the first dose given at the time of transplantation, the second 10 or 14 days after, with good success. Therefore, it seems feasible to limit the dose of daclizumab, which increases the ease of administration and probably also the cost effectiveness of this agent. There are no controlled studies comparing basiliximab and daclizumab, nor have different dose regimens been directly compared in renal transplantation. The data available suggest the differences are small, if present at all, and it is unlikely that such a trial will ever be done. With both compounds, a significant reduction in the number of acute rejection episodes following solid organ transplantation can be obtained without an increase in adverse effects or infectious complications.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the newer immunosuppressive drugs for renal transplantation: basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate (mofetil and sodium) and sirolimus. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases. Industry submissions. Current Clinical Trials register. Cochrane Collaboration Renal Disease Group. REVIEW METHODS: The review followed the InterTASC standards. Each of the five company submissions to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) contained cost-effectiveness models, which were evaluated by using a critique covering (1) model checking, (2) a detailed model description and (3) model rerunning. RESULTS: For induction therapy, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found that daclizumab significantly reduced the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and patient survival at 6 months/1 year compared with placebo, but not compared with the monoclonal antibody OKT3. There was no significant gain in patient survival or graft loss at 3 years. The incidence of side-effects with daclizumab reduced compared to OKT3. Eight RCTs found that basiliximab significantly improved 6-month/1-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection compared to placebo, but not compared to either ATG or OKT3. There was no significant gain in either 1-year patient survival or graft loss. The incidence of side-effects with basiliximab was not significantly different compared to OKT3/ATG. For initial/maintenance therapy, 13 RCTs found that tacrolimus reduced the 6-month/1-year incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared to ciclosporin. There was no significant improvement in either 1-year or long-term (up to 5 years) graft loss or patient survival. The acute rejection benefit of tacrolimus over ciclosporin appeared to be equivalent for Sandimmun and Neoral. There were important differences in the side-effect profile of tacrolimus and ciclosporin. Seven RCTs found that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduced the incidence of acute rejection. There was no significant difference in patient survival or graft loss at 1-year or 3-year follow-up. There appeared to be differences in the side-effect profiles of MMF and azathioprine (AZA). No RCTs comparing MMF with AZA were identified. One RCT compared mycophenolate sodium (MPS) to MMF and reported no difference between the two drugs in 1-year acute rejection rate, graft survival, patient survival or side-effect profile. Two RCTs suggest that addition of sirolimus to a ciclosporin-based initial/maintenance therapy reduces 1-year acute rejections in comparison to a ciclosporin (Neoral) dual therapy alone and substituting azathioprine with sirolimus in initial/maintenance therapy reduces the incidence of acute rejection. Graft and patient survival were not significantly different with either sirolimus regimen. Adding sirolimus increases the incidence of side-effects. The side-effect profiles of azathioprine and sirolimus appear to be different. For the treatment of acute rejection, three RCTs suggested that both tacrolimus and MMF reduce the incidence of subsequent acute rejection and the need for additional drug therapy. Only one RCT and one subgroup analysis in children (<18 years) were identified comparing ciclosporin to tacrolimus and sirolimus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The newer immunosuppressant drugs (basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF) consistently reduced the incidence of short-term (1-year) acute rejection compared with conventional immunosuppressive therapy. The independent use of basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF was associated with a similar absolute reduction in 1-year acute rejection rate (approximately 15%). However, the effects of these drugs did not appear to be additive (e.g. benefit of tacrolimus with adjuvant MMF was 5% reduction in acute rejection rate compared with 15% reduction with adjuvant AZA). Thus, the addition of one of these drugs to a baseline immunosuppressant regimen was likely to affect adversely the incremental cost-effectiveness of the addition of another. The trials did not assess how the improvement in short-term outcomes (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function), together with the side-effect profile associated with each drug, translated into changes in patient-related quality of life. Moreover, given the relatively short duration of trials, the impact of the newer immunosuppressants on long-term graft loss and patient survival remains uncertain. The absence of both long-term outcome and quality of life from trial data makes assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness on the newer immunosuppressants contingent on modelling based on extrapolations from short-term trial outcomes. The choice of the most appropriate short-term outcome (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function) for such modelling remains a matter of clinical and scientific debate. The decision to use acute rejection in the meta-model in this report was based on the findings of a systematic review of the literature of predictors of long-term graft outcome. Only a very small proportion of the RCTs identified in this review assessed patient-focused outcomes such as quality of life. Since immunosuppressive drugs have both clinical benefits and specific side-effects, the balance of these harms and benefits could best be quantified through future trials using quality of life measures. The design of future trials should be considered with a view to the impact of drugs on particular renal transplant groups, particularly higher risk individuals and children. Finally, there is a need for improved reporting of methodological details of future trials, such as the method of randomisation and allocation concealment. A number of issues exist around registry data, for example the use of multiple drug regimens and the need to assess the long-term outcomes. An option is the use of observational registry data including, if possible, prospective data on all consecutive UK renal transplant patients. Data capture for each patient should include immunosuppressant regimens, clinical and patient-related outcomes and patient demographics.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Monitoring of T-cell subsets in patients treated with anti-CD 25 antibody.
Daclizumab and basiliximab, the antibodies to the interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL-2R), decrease the incidence of acute rejection in renal transplantation. However, prolonged blockade of IL-2 receptor (IL-2R:CD25) may hamper apoptosis of reactive T-cell clones and thus may obstruct tolerance induction. We determined the effect of varying doses of anti-IL-2R on the number of CD3+CD25+ cells as an index of CD 25 blockade. The number of CD3+CD25+ cells was determined in four groups of induction therapies: no antibody induction; two doses of 50 or 25 mg daclizumab on day 0 and day 14; and two doses of 20 mg basiliximab at day 0 and day 4 (n=10, 24, 10, and 10, respectively). The number of CD3+CD25+ cells were monitored in whole blood before antibody infusion as well as 24 hours thereafter and weekly after transplantation. With two doses of 50 mg daclizumab, two doses of 25 mg daclizumab, and two doses of 20 mg basiliximab, the expression of CD3+CD25+ cells was completely suppressed for 12, 10, and 12 weeks posttransplantation, respectively. The reappearance of CD3+CD25+ cells above the baseline for each induction regimen was: 17 weeks for two doses of 50 mg daclizumab, 11 weeks for two doses of 25 mg daclizumab, and 13 weeks for two doses of 20 mg basiliximab. Monitoring of CD3+CD25+ cells may be utilized to tailor anti-IL-2R administration at a minimal dosage, yet retaining adequate IL-2R blockade for at least 3 months posttransplantation.
Adult↗
Cost-effectiveness analysis of basixilimab induction and calcineurin-sparing protocols in "old to old" programs using Markov models.
INTRODUCTION: Markov models are employed in economic analyses to evaluate all possible expectations in a dilemna. The introduction of a new clinical protocol (basiliximab induction with calcineurin-sparing protocols) for a group of kidney transplant recipients receiving organs from marginal donors was validated with a Markov simulation model. HYPOTHESIS: Calcineurin-sparing protocols using anti-IL-2/antibody induction (Simulect) show a beneficial effect on initial kidney function, reducing transplantation costs reception based upon mean length of stay, mean admission cost, and incidences of delayed graft function and complications during the first month after transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov simulation model was established following three different chains. A calcineurin-free regimen with basiliximab induction (chain A), a calcineurin-sparing protocol with basiliximab induction (chain B), and a conventional immunosuppressive regimen (chain C). After designing the Markov chain and cohorts, 31 patients from the "old to old" program were assigned to each chain eight to chain A, (eight to chain B, and 15 to chain C). A month after transplantation a cost-benefit study was performed guided by the three branches of the Markov model. RESULTS: The Markov model showed a benefit of induction therapies in elderly patients. A cost-benefit model showed that after a month there was a clear benefit from Calcineurin=free plus basiliximab induction therapies, with a slight benefit from calcineurin-sparing protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Markov models are extremely useful when introducing new clinical therapies. In our transplant program, a cost-effective analysis of outcomes in old patients using the Markov model showed a clear benefit of calcineurin-sparing protocols with basixilimab induction.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Steroid-free liver transplantation in children.
Although corticosteroids have been part of immunosuppressive regimens since the early days of transplantation, steroid avoidance could be beneficial. To test this hypothesis in paediatric liver transplantation, we compared liver-transplantation under steroid-free immunosuppression in 20 children, who received combined tacrolimus and basiliximab, with that under tacrolimus and steroids in 20 matched historical recipients as a historical control group. 12-month rejection-free survival was 75% in the tacrolimus-basiliximab group compared with 50% in the steroid group (p=0.05). Growth in the first year after transplantation was significantly better in the tacrolimus-basiliximab group than in the steroid group. Steroid avoidance was, therefore, not harmful to our patients, and combining tacrolimus with basiliximab as a steroid substitution seems a safe alternative to tacrolimus and steroid immunosuppression.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Prevention of acute allograft rejection in nonhuman primate lung transplant recipients: induction with chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody improves the tolerability and potentiates the immunosuppressive activity of a regimen using low doses of both microemulsion cyclosporine and 40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin.
BACKGROUND: In previous studies of cynomolgus monkey lung allograft recipients, we demonstrated significant immunosuppressive efficacy but reduced tolerability after combined treatment with high doses of microemulsion cyclosporine (CsA) and SDZ RAD (40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin). The current study was designed to compare efficacy and tolerability of a combination of low-dose CsA and high-dose SDZ RAD (CTL group) to triple therapy using the chimeric anti-interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor (CD25) monoclonal antibody (mAb) basiliximab (anti-IL-2 receptor mAb) for induction therapy (basiliximab: 5 mg intravenously on days 0 and 4) plus low-dose CsA and low-dose SDZ RAD for maintenance immunosuppression (CD25 group). CsA and anti-IL-2 receptor mAb are drugs that reduce cytokine synthesis and block IL-2-mediated lymphocyte stimulation, respectively. SDZ RAD blocks lymphocyte stimulation by other cytokines (e.g., IL-15) that are not inhibited by anti-IL-2 receptor mAb. METHODS: Twelve unilateral lung transplants were performed. Recipients were observed for 49 days by daily weight assessment, hemograms, blood chemistries, radiographs, and lung biopsies. Monkeys were euthanized before day 49 in the event of excessive weight loss (>25%) or organ failure. Target CsA trough levels were 100-200 ng/ml. Target SDZ RAD trough levels in the CTL group (no mAb) were 20-40 ng/ml, and 10-20 ng/ml in the CD25 group. RESULTS: None of the monkeys in the CD25 group needed to be euthanized early due to signs of drug toxicity. In contrast, four monkeys in the CTL group were sacrificed on days 28-35 as a result of excessive weight loss (n=3) and renal functional impairment (n=1). Three recipients in the CD25 group were euthanized on days 36, 38, and 46 as a result of persistent high fever associated with severe rejection. The median animal survival in the CTL group was 32 vs. 46 days in the CD25 group (P<0.04). The only two long-term survivors in the CTL group showed moderate rejection at day 49. The median rejection scores at day 14 (A0) and day 28 (A2) were identical in the two groups, despite the fact that the mean SDZ RAD trough level was significantly lower in the CD25 group (CTL: 38+/-3 ng/ml, CD25: 18+/-2 ng/ml, P<0.0001). After basiliximab levels fell below the minimum therapeutic level (1 mg/ml) on day 28, the median rejection score at day 49 increased to A4 in the CD25 group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to combine an anti-IL-2 receptor mAb with a drug from the rapamycin class plus CsA. Our study shows that induction therapy with basiliximab enabled SDZ RAD blood levels to be significantly reduced, which led to improved tolerability without the penalty of increased rejection.
Animals↗
Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for the prevention of rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients: current status.
The anti-interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL-2R) antibody therapy is an exciting approach to the prevention of acute rejection after renal allograft transplantation whereby immunosuppression is exerted by a selective and competitive inhibition of IL-2-induced T cell proliferation, a critical pathway of allorecognition. The anti-IL-2R antibodies specifically block the alpha-subunit of the IL-2R on activated T cells, and prevent T cell proliferation and activation of the effector arms of the immune system. The anti-IL-2R antibodies are used as induction therapy, immediately after renal transplantation, for prevention of acute cellular rejection in children and adults. During acute rejection, the IL-2Ralpha chain is no longer expressed on T cells; thus, the antibodies cannot be used to treat an existing acute rejection. Two anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibodies are currently in clinical use: daclizumab and basiliximab. In placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials in adults, daclizumab and basiliximab in combination with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection and corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection without increasing the risk of infectious or malignant complications, and neither antibody was associated with the cytokine-release syndrome. Children who receive calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression, as well as children who receive augmented immunosuppression to treat acute rejection, are at increased risk of growth impairment, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, diabetes mellitus, and cosmetic changes. In older children, the cosmetic adverse effects frequently reduce compliance with the treatment, and subsequently increase the risk of allograft loss. Being effective and well tolerated in children, the anti-IL-2R antibodies reduce the need for calcineurin inhibitors while maintaining the overall efficacy of the regimen; thus, the anti-IL-2R antibodies increase the safety margin (less toxicity, fewer adverse effects) of the baseline immunosuppression. Secondly, the anti-IL-2R antibodies decrease the need for corticosteroids and muromonab CD3 (OKT3) in children as a result of decreased incidence of acute rejection. The recommended pediatric dose of daclizumab is 1 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days for five doses, with the first dose administered within 24 hours pre-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains daclizumab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (5-10 microg/mL) in children for at least 12 weeks.The recommended pediatric dose of basiliximab for recipients <35 kg is 10 mg, and 20 mg for recipients > or =35 kg, intravenously on days 0 and 4 post-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains basiliximab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (>0.2 microg/mL) in children for at least 3 weeks.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
T-lymphocyte apoptosis is increased by non-interleukin-2-dependent induction in human mixed lymphocyte cultures.
INTRODUCTION: Transplant tolerance is dependent on the apoptotic deletion of allospecific T lymphocytes following interleukin-2 (IL-2)-dependent T-lymphocyte activation. Current immunosuppressive strategies block IL-2 and may prevent T-cell activation. We examined apoptotic alterations in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC), a model of allospecific lymphocyte activation, by polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte antibody thymoglobulin (rATG) and monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antibody basiliximab. METHODS: Human lymphocytes were isolated using Ficoll-Paque gradient. Cesium-irradiated (2500 rad) stimulator cells (10(6) cells/mL) were cocultured with equal numbers of responder cells. Apoptosis was measured using annexin-V staining and propidium iodide exclusion using flow cytometry. Isolated protein was analyzed using Western blotting with densitometry. RESULTS: Apoptosis increased at days 3 and 7 in rATG MLC compared with control and basiliximab MLC. Fas was up-regulated in rATG MLC in a dose-dependent manner, whereas basiliximab did not alter fas. FasL was increased initially and at late time points in rATG MLC. CONCLUSIONS: Polyclonal rATG increased apoptosis and production of the proapoptotic proteins fas and fasL. In contrast, monoclonal basiliximab did not change lymphocyte apoptosis or apoptotic protein production. These results suggest that a specific IL-2 pathway blockade may prevent allospecific tolerance and that a non-IL-2 pathway blockade may encourage apoptosis of allospecifically activated T cells.
Antilymphocyte Serum↗
Initial clinical experience with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.
Since 1996, our standard immunosuppressive protocol for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids without antibody induction. When basiliximab and daclizumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), became available, we selectively added these agents to our standard protocol. The purpose of this prospective, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-2 receptor antagonists in SKPT. From April 1998 to August 1999, 35 SKPTS were performed. One patient with delayed graft function received Thymoglobulin and was excluded; 17 received no induction, and 17 received IL-2R antagonists (9 basiliximab, 8 daclizumab) as induction. Demographic- and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 6 months, patient survival was 88 % (15/17) in the induction arm compared to 100 % (17/17) in the no-induction arm, P = NS. The 2 causes of death were sepsis and hemolytic uremic syndrome, and both patients died with functioning grafts. Death-censored pancreas and kidney graft survival rates in the induction and the no-induction groups were 88 % vs. 100 % respectively, in both groups. The incidence of acute rejection (kidney or pancreas) at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (35 % in both groups). Biopsy proven pancreas and kidney acute rejections were 35 % vs. 24 % and 12 % vs. 12 % in the induction- and no-induction groups, respectively. The incidences of major infection and readmission did not differ between groups. TAC trough levels and mean daily doses of TAC, MMF and steroids did not differ between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The incidence of event-free survival (no death, rejection, or graft loss) at 6 months was 59 % (10/17) in the induction and 65 % (11/17) in the no-induction group. Basiliximab and daclizumab appear to be safe in SKPT. However, the preliminary results of this study do not demonstrate a significant benefit in either reducing the incidence of acute rejection or improving outcomes at 6 months. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Open-label, multicenter study on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Simulect in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving triple therapy with cyclosporin, mycophenolate, and corticosteroids.
INTRODUCTION: Basiliximab is a monoclonal antibody directed to the interleukin-2 receptor. Several studies have demonstrated both its efficacy and safety. Even with the use of polyclonal antibodies in renal pediatric transplant recipients, the local incidence of steroid-resistant rejections has been close to 10% of the total incidence of acute rejection episodes (AREs). An open, multicenter prospective study was performed to assess the safety tolerability, and efficacy of induction with basiliximab in renal pediatric transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and steroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (8 boys) of mean age 11.9 +/- 4.5 years and body weight 32 +/- 15 kg received cadaveric (n = 7) or living (n = 11) donor grafts. Simulect was administered on days 0 and 4. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Safety assessment consisted of a description of the adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Six BPAR (Banff I and II) occurred in 5, (27.7%) children all of which were steroid responsive. Creatinine levels at day 7 and months 3, 6, and 12 were 1.6 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, and 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, respectively. Schwartz calculation at 12 months was 71 +/- 15 mL/1.73 m2 AEs were hypertension (12), anemia (9), abdominal pain (8), metabolic acidosis (8), nausea (7), diarrhea (2), gingival hypertrophy (2), hirsutism (2), lymphocele (2), and infections (15). No deaths, graft losses, PTLDs, or malignancies were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No steroid-resistant AREs, were observed in this pediatric group using basiliximab. The Schwartz calculation at 12 months was 71 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function.
There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.
Adolescent↗
A single center's clinical experience with quadruple immunosuppression including ATG or IL2 antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants.
UNLABELLED: Acute rejection remains a major problem in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant and occurs in 60-100% of the cases. With the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) replacing azathioprine (AZA) as a basis immunosuppressant, reduced rates of rejection have been reported. This study investigates the frequency and clinical relevance of allograft rejection in SPK patients receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or Basiliximab induction therapy and cyclosporine Neoral (CyA), MMF, steroid basis immunosuppression. Between December 1996 and October 1999, 21 consecutive patients (15 males, 6 females) received a SPK transplant at our institution with a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) age of 42 +/- 6 yr. Of these, 14 patients were treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) Fresenius (rabbit) 3-5 mg/kg for 6 +/- 2 d, cyclosporine Neoral (CyA) (trough levels 350-400 ng/mL), MMF 3 g/d and low dose steroid therapy. Seven SPK patients were treated with Basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis 20 mg on d 0 and d 4 post-transplant) instead of ATG. The patients had an average human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch of 3.9/6 and a negative cross match. All patients remained on triple drug therapy. Three patients were switched to tacrolimus instead of Neoral for CyA intolerance. The mean +/- SD cold ischemia time (CIT) of the organs was 10.1 +/- 2.4 h for the pancreas and 10.5 +/- 2.6 h for the kidney. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in the kidney of 1 ATG patient (8%), which responded to steroid bolus therapy. One of the patients (14%) with Basiliximab induction developed renal allograft rejection, which was resolved after a 6-d course of anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) treatment. All patients (100%) were free from rejection in the pancreas, as measured by urine amylase levels and glycemic control without the need for exogenous insulin with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA1C) of 5.1 +/- 0.7%, and serum creatinine with a mean of 1.24 +/- 0.24 mg/dL in a mean follow-up period of 17 +/- 15 months (median 12, range 2 37). CONCLUSION: Triple drug immunosuppression including cyclosporine, MMF and low dose steroids with ATG or interleukin 2 (IL2) receptor antibodies induction therapy appears to be a very suitable immunosuppressive regimen for combined pancreas-kidney transplant (PKT) with a marked reduction in the incidence of rejection.
Adult↗