Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SALIVATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Oral medicine -- update for the dental practitioner: dry mouth and disorders of salivation.

This series provides an overview of current thinking in the more relevant areas of oral medicine for primary care practitioners, written by the authors while they were holding the Presidencies of the European Association for Oral Medicine and the British Society for Oral Medicine, respectively. A book containing additional material will be published. The series gives the detail necessary to assist the primary dental clinical team caring for patients with oral complaints that may be seen in general dental practice. Space precludes inclusion of illustrations of uncommon or rare disorders, or discussion of disorders affecting the hard tissues. Approaching the subject mainly by the symptomatic approach -- as it largely relates to the presenting complaint -- was considered to be a more helpful approach for GDPs rather than taking a diagnostic category approach. The clinical aspects of the relevant disorders are discussed, including a brief overview of the aetiology, detail on the clinical features and how the diagnosis is made. Guidance on management and when to refer is also provided, along with relevant websites which offer further detail.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Muscarinic receptor binding, plasma concentration and inhibition of salivation after oral administration of a novel antimuscarinic agent, solifenacin succinate in mice.

1 A novel muscarinic receptor antagonist, solifenacin succinate, inhibited specific binding of [N-methyl-(3)H]-scopolamine ([(3)H]-NMS) in the mouse bladder, submaxillary gland and heart in a concentration-dependent manner. This inhibitory effect was greatest in the submaxillary gland, followed by the bladder and heart. 2 After oral administration of oxybutynin (76.1 micromol kg(-1)) or solifenacin (62.4, 208 micromol kg(-1)), a significant dose- and time-dependent increase in K(D) values for specific [(3)H]-NMS binding was seen in the bladder, prostate, submaxillary gland, heart, colon and lung, compared with control values. The increase in K(D) induced by oxybutynin in each tissue reached a maximum 0.5 h after oral administration and then rapidly declined, while that induced by solifenacin was greatest 2 h after administration and was maintained for at least 6 or 12 h, depending on the dose. The muscarinic receptor binding of oral solifenacin was slower in onset and of a longer duration than that of oxybutynin. 3 Plasma concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite (N-desethyl-oxybutynin, DEOB) were maximum 0.5 h after its oral administration and then declined rapidly. Oral solifenacin persisted in the blood for longer than oxybutynin. 4 Pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion in mice was significantly reduced by oral administration of solifenacin and was completely abolished 0.5 h after oral oxybutynin. Although the suppression induced by solifenacin was more persistent than that due to oxybutynin, the antagonistic effect of solifenacin on the dose-response curves to pilocarpine was significantly weaker than that of oxybutynin. It is concluded that oral solifenacin persistently binds to muscarinic receptors in tissues expressing the M(3) subtype, such as the bladder.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Effects of pilocarpine hydrochloride and cevimeline on submandibular/sublingual salivation in rat xerostomia model produced by X-ray irradiation.

The present study was performed to assess the effects of pilocarpine hydrochloride ((3S,4R)-3-ethyl-dihydro-4-[(1-methyl-1H-imidazole-5-yl)methyl]-2(3H)-furanone monohydrochloride, CAS 54-71-7) and cevimeline ((+/-)-cis-2-methylspiro[1,3-oxathiolane-5,3'-quinuclidine] hydrochloride, hemihydrate, CAS 153504-70-2), muscarinic receptor agonists, on salivary secretion from the submandibular/sublingual (SM/SL) glands in normal rats and in rats with xerostomia induced by X-ray (15 Gy) irradiation. To clarify their pharmacological safety profiles, the two drugs were further compared with regard to subtype selectivity for muscarinic receptors (M1, M2, and M3) and central nervous, respiratory, and cardiovascular effects. Pilocarpine hydrochloride (0.1-0.8 mg/kg i.d.) and cevimeline (3-30 mg/kg i.d.) dose-dependently increased salivary flow rate and total salivary volume in a 120-min period from SM/SL glands in both normal and irradiated rats, the minimum effective doses for their sialagogic effects being 0.2 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Both drugs also increased protein output from SM/SL glands to a degree that depended on the increase in salivary volume in normal and irradiated rats. In a binding study using radiolabeled antagonists, neither pilocarpine hydrochloride nor cevimeline displayed subtype selectivity for muscarinic receptors, indicating non-selective muscarinic agonism. Effects on the central nervous system (CNS) were assessed by monitoring changes in body temperature in conscious normal rats. Pilocarpine hydrochloride (0.4-4 mg/kg p.o.) had no effect on body temperature, but cevimeline (30 and 100 mg/kg p.o.) caused a significant hypothermia. In terms of respiratory and cardiovascular effects in anesthetized normal rats, there was no clear difference in safety margin between pilocarpine hydrochloride and cevimeline, both drugs inducing significant changes in respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood pressure at doses close to those inducing sialagogic effects. These results suggest that pilocarpine hydrochloride could be used as a sialagogic drug for postirradiation-induced xerostomia with fewer adverse effects on the CNS.

Animals↗