Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Programmed Instructions as Topic”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Therapist contact and outcome of self-exposure treatment for phobias. A controlled study.

Eighty-four chronic phobic patients were randomly assigned to self-exposure in vivo instructed by either a psychiatrist, a computer or a book; mean therapy time per patient was respectively 3.1, 3.2 and 0 hours. Seventy-one patients completed treatment. All three groups improved substantially and similarly to 6 months follow-up, with no significant difference between them; self-exposure treatment was effective even without therapist contact. Among the three groups, initial expectation of help and positive attitude to the psychiatrist were equally high and related to subsequent rating of help received. All three groups rated the psychiatrist as more tolerant, reliable, and understanding than the computer or book, but these attitudes did not relate to outcome, were initially similar among all three groups, and changed minimally at 6 months follow-up.

Adolescent↗

Learning modules as a supplement to existing audiovisual aids.

The development and use of supplementary learning modules for audiovisual aids designed for wider audiences was found to be a feasible approach for the education of family practice residents. This approach allows programs to direct learner attention to areas of greatest interest in family practice. It was not excessively time consuming to develop the two modules and extensive technical expertise with media was not required. It was found that the modules were adaptable to individual or group use. This teaching method appears to be an excellent learning tool for residents. Supplementary learning modules may be useful for medical students and other health-care providers in family practice. Further economy of time and other innovations using this basic approach could result from recruiting family practice residents and other students to develop their own learning modules on topics of individual interest.

Audiovisual Aids↗

Structured packs for independent learning: a comparison of learning outcome and acceptability with conventional teaching.

OBJECTIVES: The GMC recommends that students become independent learners, while tutor time is an increasingly precious resource. A set of structured learning materials requiring students to undertake and reflect on practical tasks in five learning areas was developed. DESIGN: The study used a randomized control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of using these structured learning materials in place of conventional teaching for 228 third-year undergraduate students and 55 teachers, on both hospital and community based medical and general practice firms. Evaluation involved assessing student performance on an examination question and a writing task, together with a student and tutor satisfaction questionnaire. SETTING: King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London. SUBJECTS: Third-year medical (first-year clinical) undergraduates. RESULTS: No significant difference in learning outcome was found for students on community- and hospital-based medical and general practice firms between students who had used the structured materials and those who had had conventional teaching on the same topic. The packs were acceptable to tutors and students. CONCLUSIONS: Such resources represent a mid-point between formal didactic teaching and self-directed learning. They may be particularly suitable for promoting independent learning for students on traditional medical courses. They offer an appropriate way to cover certain topics in the clinical curriculum and help to protect tutor time for topics which cannot be effectively taught in other ways.

Clinical Medicine↗

Self-directed learning and continuing professional development.

This is the first of a series of articles on topics that will be relevant to radiologists planning personal learning projects and continuing professional development (CPD) activities for the Maintenance of Certification Program. Topics of future articles include: program development, needs assessment, small-group learning, problem-based learning and evidence-based radiology.

Canada↗

Oral cancer education training methods: a comparison of self-study and didactic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Dentists' competence and comfort level in detecting oral cancer may be strongly influenced by their dental school training. The purpose of this study was to compare the demonstrated knowledge of oral cancer topics among students receiving lectures and those learning the material through self-instruction at two dental schools. METHODS: Students at School 1 received 17 hours of lectures on various topics in oral cancer, including epidemiology, etiologic factors, histopathology, clinical appearance, clinical management and treatment, and oral complications. Lecture topics reflected material in the assigned text. Students at School 2 received only an introductory lecture, followed by a ten-week self-paced course using the same text used in School 1. At the end of the courses, the students at the two schools received identical 50-item final examinations. RESULTS: The students who had received the lectures and assigned readings scored significantly higher than did those assigned self-instruction alone (mean score of 91.2% vs 81.3%; p < 0.0001). This difference remained after statistical adjustment for entering grade-point average and Dental Aptitude Test score. CONCLUSIONS: Self-study of assigned readings may result in lower levels of knowledge of oral cancer topics than more traditional lecture-based teaching. The impact of this difference on clinical performance has not yet been demonstrated.

Analysis of Variance↗

Developing a clinical education program from the clinician's perspective.

As the number of physical therapy programs increases, more physical therapy departments will be developing clinical education programs. A guide for clinicians who are developing clinical education programs is presented. Suggestions are made for developing a philosophy of clinical education and for structuring the program. Topics discussed include guidelines for clinical instructors and students, learning contracts, negotiable time, and program evaluation. Examples adapted from the clinical education materials developed at Massachusetts Rehabilitation Hospital are included.

Philosophy, Medical↗

Three methods of oral health education in secondary schools.

In 1990, three methods of oral health education (OHE) were implemented in three secondary schools in the city of Pori, Finland, one method in each school. The traditional OHE consisted of a lecture given by a dentist with the aid of transparencies and slides. The peer OHE consisted of a lecture given by six pupils from the upper grades. These pupils used transparencies and extracts of video films and had a classroom exhibition with pictures, slogans, and dental aids and instruments. The self-teaching OHE was based on an exhibition from which the pupils searched for the information themselves. After the programs, the pupils' opinions about the method itself, its contents and implementation, knowledge about certain oral health issues, and the possible effect of the method were determined by a questionnaire. The attitudes and opinions were most positive in the peer OHE group. The traditional OHE was quite well accepted, but the self-teaching method was not very successful. The participants in the traditional OHE more often felt that they had been encouraged to pursue good oral health habits. In all groups, the topic considered to be the most boring was tooth brushing. Peer OHE can be recommended for Finnish secondary schools. The issue of tooth brushing should be played down, however, as too frequent repetition of the topic may cause more negative attitudes towards oral health education and practices.

Adolescent↗