Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Perforations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique.

Do perforating lateral osteotomies cause less ecchymosis and edema compared with the popular continuous method? Many studies have demonstrated that perforated osteotomies cause less trauma and periosteal disruption. Numerous investigators have subjectively perceived less postoperative ecchymosis and edema, but no clinical study has compared the perforated methods versus the continuous technique in the same patient. This prospective, randomized, partially blinded study was designed to test the hypothesis that the perforating method causes less postoperative ecchymosis and edema compared with the continuous lateral osteotomy technique. The questions remain: does the type of perforating osteotomy affect the results? Does a percutaneous approach cause more ecchymosis and edema by the access maneuver of piercing the skin? The two perforating lateral nasal osteotomy techniques require the same 2-mm straight osteotome, so any genuine difference in postoperative ecchymosis or edema could only be attributed to the differing surgical approaches. Accordingly, this study also tests whether the external percutaneous perforating osteotomy causes more ecchymosis and edema than the internal transnasal perforating method. Twenty-five consecutive rhinoplasty patients (group A) requiring bilateral osteotomies (50 total lateral osteotomies) were randomized so that each patient received an internal/transnasal perforating lateral osteotomy (2-mm straight chisel) on one side and an internal/transnasal continuous osteotomy (4-mm curved, guarded osteotome) on the other. The next 25 patients studied (group B) received an external/percutaneous perforating lateral osteotomy (same 2-mm straight chisel as used in group A) on one side and the same internal/transnasal continuous osteotomy on the other. The final 25 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (group C) received an external percutaneous perforating lateral osteotomy on one side and an internal transnasal perforating lateral osteotomy on the other. The entry sites for the perforating osteotomies were either external (groups B and C) with a percutaneous skin puncture or intranasal (groups A and C) at the pyriform aperture. All 75 patients (150 total lateral osteotomies) initialed the surgical plan on the Gunter rhinoplasty worksheet, which has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota (study no. 1341-1 M). All patients were evaluated for ecchymosis and edema on the left versus the right side of the face at 2 to 3, 7, and 21 days after the operation. The clinical evaluation was performed by two blinded examiners (clinic registered nurse and the patient with his or her family) and a partially blinded examiner (the surgeon, who did not refresh his memory about the randomization). To compare the two methods in each study (groups A, B, and C) for the six outcomes (edema and ecchymosis at 2 to 3, 7, and 21 days), the authors used an exact binomial test of the null hypothesis that the treatments do not differ. To compare the two methods in each study (groups A, B, and C) using all six outcomes simultaneously, the authors used a permutation test. By both testing methods, the perforating internal method was superior to the continuous technique (group A; p < 0.01 in both tests). Although the perforating external method gave better results than the continuous technique (group B) and the perforating internal method gave better results than the perforating external method (group C), neither of these differences was significant by either testing method. A lateral osteotomy technique should be precise, reproducible, and safe, and it should minimize ecchymosis and edema. Since edema and ecchymosis are comparable regardless of osteotome size, this prospective randomized study confirms the subjective clinical impression that perforating lateral osteotomies with a 2-mm straight osteotome reduce postoperative ecchymosis and edema in rhinoplasty patients compared with the continuous osteotomy (4-mm curved, guarded osteotome). These findings should encourage te the use of perforating osteotomies rather than continuous osteotomies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Glove perforation rate in open lung surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In open lung surgery the surgical access is encircled by the ribs, which should result in a high glove perforation rate compared with other surgical specialities. METHODS: Prospectively the surgeon, first and second assistant and the scrub nurse wore double standard latex gloves during 100 thoracotomies. Parameters recorded were: procedure performed, number of perforations, localization of perforation, the seniority of the surgeon, manoeuvre performed at the moment of perforation, immediate cause of perforation, operation time, performance of rib resection during thoracotomy and time of occurrence of the first three perforations. RESULTS: One thousand, six hundred and seventy-three gloves (902 outer, 771 inner) were tested. In 78 operations perforations occurred. There were 150 outer glove perforations (8.9%, 0-8, mean 1.23), 19 inner glove perforations (1.13%, 0-2, mean 0.19). Cutaneous blood exposure was prevented in 78% of all operations and in 87% of all perforations. The perforation rate for the surgeon, the scrub nurse, the first and the second assistant were 61.2, 40.4, 9.7 and 3.1% of all operations, respectively. Rib resection and a duration of more than 2 h resulted in a significant rise of glove perforation rate (P<0.05). The personal experience of the surgeon and the type of operation did not correlate with glove perforation. The immediate cause leading to perforation was named in only 17 cases (13.7%) and comprised contact with bone (seven), a needle stitch (seven) and a production flaw (three). Leaks were localized mostly on the first finger (18%),second finger, (39%) palm and dorsum of the hand (16%). The average occurrence of all first perforations was 38.7 min (range 3-190) after the beginning of surgery, the second after 63.2 min (range 10-195). Fifty-four first perforations (50.5%) were found during the first 30 min of the operation. CONCLUSIONS: The reported perforation rate of 78% lies in the highest range of reported perforation rates in different surgical specialities. Double gloving effectively prevented cutaneous blood exposure and thus should become a routine for the thoracic surgeon to prevent transmission of infectious diseases from the patient to the surgeon.

Equipment Failure↗
PubMed2000

Use of accurate diagnostic criteria may increase incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon.

PURPOSE: Stercoral perforation of the colon is reported to be a rare disease with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of stercoral perforation of the colon, to define diagnostic criteria for stercoral perforation of the colon, and to analyze the patient outcome in a university hospital gastrointestinal surgery unit. METHODS: From November 1993 until November 1998 all surgically treated patients with a colorectal disease were prospectively recorded in a computerized database. Diagnosis of stercoral perforation of the colon was made if 1) the colonic perforation was round or ovoid, exceeded 1 cm in diameter, and lay antimesenteric; 2) fecalomas were present within the colon, protruding through the perforation site or lying within the abdominal cavity; and 3) pressure necrosis or ulcer and chronic inflammatory reaction around the perforation site were present microscopically. Any additional colon pathology led to exclusion from the diagnosis of stercoral perforation of the colon. Using the same criteria, 81 cases in the literature were found to qualify and were further analyzed. RESULTS: In a five-year period 1,295 patients underwent colorectal interventions through laparotomy. A total of 566 (44 percent) cases were emergencies, 220 (17 percent) of these caused by colonic perforation. Seven patients had stercoral perforation of the colon. The incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon was 0.5 percent of all surgical colorectal procedures through laparotomy, 1.2 percent of all emergency colorectal procedures, and 3.2 percent of all colonic perforations. The mean age of the patients was 59 (median, 64; range, 22-85) years. All perforations were situated in the left hemicolon or upper rectum. The round or ovoid perforation had a mean diameter of 3.6 cm. Fecalomas were present in all patients and protruded from the perforation site or were found within the free abdominal cavity in three of them. Generalized stercoral peritonitis was a constant finding. Using a colonic resection without immediate restoration of continuity, an extensive intraoperative lavage, and antibiotics, there was no in-hospital mortality. Analysis of the reports in the literature revealed additionally that 28 percent of patients with stercoral perforation of the colon have multiple stercoral ulcers in the colon and that substantial mortality is encountered if only minor surgical procedures of treatment are used. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of stercoral perforation of the colon seemed to have been underestimated. The reason for this might be the lack of defined diagnostic criteria for this disease. Low mortality is obtained by early surgical eradication of the affected part of the colon, including all stercoral ulcers, and by aggressive therapy for peritonitis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Rectal perforations after barium enema: a review.

PURPOSE: Rectal injuries during barium enema are rare but life-threatening complications. The last review about this subject was published more than ten years ago. In the present review, we present an overview on the subject and especially focus on changes in treatment strategies and developments of less risky visualization techniques. METHODS: A literature search was performed in the PubMed library using the key words-barium enema, complications, peritonitis, and rectal perforation-as well as related articles and other references obtained from these articles. RESULTS: The most frequent cause of perforation is iatrogenic and catheter-related. Other causes are related to weakness of the colorectal wall or obstruction. Five types of perforations have been described: 1) perforations of the anal canal below the levator; 2) incomplete perforations; 3) perforations into the retroperitoneum; 4) transmural perforations into adjacent viscera; 5) perforations into the free intraperitoneal cavity. Most incomplete perforations and one-half of the retroperitoneal perforations have minimal clinical signs. Intraperitoneal perforations lead to the most catastrophic course, starting with rectal bleeding and mild abdominal complaints. This is rapidly followed by progressive sepsis and peritonitis, and leads to a high mortality rate. Surgery is not always required for intramural or small retroperitoneal perforations. These can be treated conservatively and require surgical debridement only in case of large amounts of extravasation or abscesses. Surgical repair of large rectal mucosal lesions or anal sphincter lesions is advised. Perirectal abscesses require drainage. Intraperitoneal perforations with gross extravasation need immediate aggressive surgical treatment in a critical care setting, because the threat of shock is high. Intraperitoneal perforations, neglected perforations, gross barium extravasation, poorly prepared colon, and venous intravasation of barium are prognostically unfavorable. The severest late complication in intraperitoneal perforations is ileus. Meticulous technical performance of the barium enema is the most important factor in prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal perforations after barium enema are rare. The overall mortality rate decreased in recent decades from approximately 50 to 35 percent as the result of advances in supportive and intensive care. Because of these advances, more aggressive surgical strategies were undertaken. With the advent of endoscopy, less barium enemas are performed. Consequently, the absolute incidence of complications has decreased. It is expected that in the future barium enemas will be replaced by more sensitive and less risky techniques, such as CT colonography and magnetic resonance colonography.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed2006

[Analysis of air caloric testing results for patients suffering from tympanic membrane perforation with vertigo].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze characteristic of air caloric testing for patients with tympanic membrane perforation and to assess the availability of this testing for the patients. METHOD: Forty-three cases of chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation and vertigo were investigated, in which there were 37 cases with single ear perforation and 6 cases with bilateral perforation. The patients were performed by air caloric testing, to observe the characteristic of nystagmus,slow phase velocity (SPV) and unilateral weakness (UW). RESULT: Four types of nystagmus, including enhancing, "normal", weakening and inversion, were observed with bilateral caloric air stimulation in ears with tympanic membrane perforation. Nystagmus of perforated ear presented SPV increased exceeding normal range or non-perforated ear and UW > 15% (15 cases, 17 ears), which was called enhancing type; normal nystagmus SPV in bilateral ear and UW < 15% (7 cases) was called "normal" type; weakened nystagmus SPV in perforated ear to non-perforated ear and UW > 15% (9 cases) was called weakening type; normal nystagmus in non-perforated ear and inverted caloric nystagmus in perforated ear (12 cases, 14 ears) was called inversion type. In patients with chronic otitis media recurring lately, inverted nystagmus was observed in perforated ears with effusion and humidity in the tympanic cavity, the other types were observed in patients in stillness stage of otitis media. CONCLUSION: Bilateral caloric air became strong stimulation for the perforated ear, nystagmus of perforated ear with normal function of semicircular canal was stronger than that of the non-perforated ear. While the perforated ear with undermined function of semicircular canal, nystagmus could present normal or weakened. In the patients with otitis media in active stage, hot air stimulation could be turned to cool stimulation response so as to cause inverted nystagmus. Air caloric testing can be used to assess vestibular function of the patients with tympanic membrane perforation and vertigo.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Morphological characteristics of perforated synapses in the latter stages of synaptogenesis in rat neocortex: stereological and three-dimensional approaches.

Over recent years attention has been focused on perforated synapses (PSs), on account of their possible involvement in synaptic plasticity in the nervous system. The mechanism invoked has involved the conversion of conventional (non-perforated) synapses into perforated ones, with the latter subsequently splitting to form new daughter synapses. Data challenging this mechanism have emerged from studies using unbiased stereological and three-dimensional reconstruction procedures in early synaptogenesis and also in early- to mid-adulthood. The present study is an attempt to complement these earlier studies by concentrating on the latter part of synaptogenesis and early adulthood in rats (7-60 days postnatal). Using the disector method, the frequency of perforated synapses increases with age from 12% at seven days to 33% at 60 days. Reconstruction of the perforated synapses has led to the description of three sub-types, while quantitation of the reconstructions has highlighted major differences between perforated and non-perforated synapses over this developmental period. For instance, the postsynaptic density of perforated synapses increases in size with age, but remains static in the non-perforated variety; in addition, it is 2-3 times larger in perforated synapses. The proportion of the synaptic contact zone occupied by the postsynaptic density increases in perforated synapses with increasing age, but is static in non-perforated synapses. No evidence has been found to support a perforated synapse splitting model, since perforated synapses are present from early in synaptogenesis, the frequency of non-perforated synapses reaches a peak prior to, but not following, that of perforated synapses, and the size of the postsynaptic density of non-perforated synapses remains constant throughout the period of the study.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Detection of esophageal perforation using intraesophageal dye injection.

OBJECTIVES: Esophageal perforation complicating anterior cervical spine surgery is a potentially fatal complication. Early identification and immediate treatment may lower adverse effects for the patient. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intraesophageal dye injection to detect an esophageal injury and to test two novel techniques. METHOD: Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected using an anteromedial Smith-Robinson approach. Each was sequentially tested by a control and three dye injection techniques: technique A: nasogastric tube alone; technique B: nasogastric tube plus a distally placed Foley catheter; technique C: proximal plus a distally placed Foley catheter. Each technique was tested against esophageal perforations created by needle puncture (21-gauge, 18-gauge, and 14-gauge) and by a 2-mm high-speed burr. Dye visualization was independently graded as present or absent by two authors. RESULTS: In the control trial, no dye leak was visualized in any of the 10 specimens. In technique A, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 1 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 2 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 6 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique B, 1 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 8 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 9 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique C, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 10 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 7 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that intraesophageal dye injection via nasogastric tube alone should not be relied upon to exclude the presence of esophageal perforation. Two novel techniques showed an improved, though limited, capability of detecting esophageal perforations.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2005

A case and review of bowel perforation secondary to metastatic lung cancer.

Gastrointestinal tract perforation (GITP) secondary to metastatic lung cancer is extremely rare. We present a case of small bowel perforation secondary to metastatic lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the current literature and further characterize the incidence, histology, and risk of GITP secondary to lung cancer metastasis. A Medline search was done to identify all the cases of GITP attributed to metastatic lung cancer reported in the literature. Data was collected and analyzed from a collection of cases in the medical literature since 1960. We identified 98 cases of perforated lung cancer metastasis to the small intestine. Four gastric perforations, three colonic perforations, and one appendiceal perforation were also identified but not analyzed. The mean age was 64.5 years. There was a male predominance of 89 per cent versus 11 per cent female. Perforations occurred most often in the jejunum (53%) followed by ileum (28%). Combined jejunum-ileum lesions accounted for 4 per cent of perforations. No duodenal perforations were reported, though a specific site was not determined in 13 per cent of cases. Small bowel perforations were most often caused by adenocarcinoma (23.7%), squamous cell carcinoma (22.7%), large cell carcinoma (20.6%), and small cell carcinoma (19.6%). The prevalence of small bowel perforation secondary to a given primary lung cancer histology varied by region. The mean survival was 66 days with 50 per cent of patients not surviving past 30 days. Despite a high incidence of lung cancer, small bowel perforation secondary to lung cancer metastasis remains relatively rare. Perforated metastases occur more often in men and are found more commonly in the jejunum. Small bowel perforations are caused most often by adenocarcinoma; however, squamous cell and large cell carcinoma metastases are more likely to result in perforation. Small bowel perforation in this setting has a significant impact on mortality, decreasing 1-year survival to less than 3 per cent.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicled perforator flaps have not been widely described for the breast. The aim of this study is to report our clinical experience with pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between May 2000 and May 2003, pedicled perforator flaps were used in 31 patients. The indications were immediate partial breast reconstruction and thoracic reconstruction for carcinomatous mastitis or tumour recurrence. Perforators were identified by Doppler preoperatively. The Doppler-located thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) or another perforator such as the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) was looked for. If the perforators had good calibers, the flaps were then based solely on these perforators. If the perforators were tiny but pulsating, the TDAP flap was harvested as a muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi type I (MS-LD I) with a small piece of muscle (4x2 cm) included to protect the perforators. If the perforators were not-pulsating, a larger segment of the LD muscle was incorporated to include the maximum of perforators (MS-LD II flap). The nerve that innervates the rest of the LD muscle was always spared. If most of the LD was included in the flap, the flap was then classified as MS-LD III. RESULTS: The mean flap dimensions were 20x8 cm. Using this algorithm, the TDAP flap was harvested in 18 cases and the ICAP flap in three cases. In addition, there were 10 MS-LD flaps with a variable amount of muscle. In addition, one parascapular flap was dissected. A successful flap transfer was achieved in all but three patients, in whom limited partial necrosis occurred. Seroma was not encountered at the donor sites of the perforator flaps (0%) compared to four (40%) after a MS-LD flap. CONCLUSION: Our results show that pedicled perforator flaps are additional options for breast surgery and that they may be used whenever an adequate perforator can be found. This technique is safe and reliable if the algorithm described is used when choosing a flap.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores.

PURPOSE: Current techniques to treat venous ulcerations and patients with severe lipodermatosclerosis include the elimination of incompetent perforator veins by open surgical ligation and division or by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. An alternative and less invasive means to obliterate perforator veins is ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS). We hypothesize that UGS is a clinically effective means of eliminating perforator veins and results in improvement of the clinical state (scores) without the complications associated with other more invasive methods. METHODS: Between January 2000 and March 2004, UGS was used to treat chronic venous insufficiency in 80 limbs of 68 patients. This was a clinical series of patients who had perforator incompetence and no previous surgery for venous disease < or = 2 years of their UGS procedure. Most had perforator disease without coexisting axial reflux of the saphenous or deep venous systems. Color flow duplex scanning was used to identify incompetent perforator veins in the calf, and duplex guidance was used to inject each perforator with the liquid sclerosant sodium morrhuate (5%). Patients were restudied by duplex scanning up to 5 years after treatment. Clinical results were determined by Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Disability Score (VDS) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 80 limbs treated with UGS, 98% of incompetent perforators were successfully obliterated at the time of treatment, and 75% of limbs showed persistent occlusion of perforators and remained clinically improved with a mean follow-up of 20.1 months. According to the CEAP classification, there were 46.2% with limb ulceration or C6, 1.2% C5, 28.7% C4, 17.5% C3, and 6.2% C2 with pain isolated to the site of the perforator(s). Of those who returned for follow-up, the VCSSs changed from a median of 8 before treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 15) to a median of 2 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 7) (P < .01). Likewise, VDSs dropped from a median of 4 before treatment (95% CI, 1 to 3) to 1 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 2) (P < .01). There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis involving the deep vein adjacent to the perforator injected. One patient had skin complications with skin necrosis. Perforator recurrence was found more frequently in those with ulcerations than those without. CONCLUSION: UGS is an effective and durable method of eliminating incompetent perforator veins and results in significant reduction of symptoms and signs as determined by venous clinical scores. As an alternative to open interruption or subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery, UGS may lead to fewer skin and wound healing complications. Perforator recurrence occurs particularly in those with ulcerations, and therefore, surveillance duplex scanning after UGS and repeat injections may be needed.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Although the risk of bowel perforation is often cited as a major factor in the choice between colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy for colorectal screening, good estimates of the absolute and relative risks of perforation are lacking. METHODS: We used a large population-based cohort that consisted of a random sample of 5% of Medicare beneficiaries living in regions of the United States covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries to determine rates of perforation in people aged 65 years and older. We identified individuals who were cancer-free and had undergone colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy between 1991 and 1998, calculated both the incidence and risk of perforation within 7 days of the procedure, and explored the impact on incidence and risk of perforation of age, race/ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, and indication for the procedure. We also estimated the risk of death after perforation. Risks were calculated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: There were 77 perforations after 39 286 colonoscopies (incidence = 1.96/1000 procedures) and 31 perforations after 35 298 sigmoidoscopies (incidence = 0.88/1000 procedures). After adjustment, the OR for perforation from colonoscopy relative to perforation from sigmoidoscopy was 1.8 (95% CI = 1.2 to 2.8). Risk of perforation from either procedure increased in association with increasing age (P(trend)<.001 for both procedures) and the presence of two or more comorbidities (P(trend)<.001 for colonoscopy and P(trend) =.03 for sigmoidoscopy). Compared with those who were endoscopied and did not have a perforation, the risk of death was statistically significantly increased for those who had a perforation after either colonoscopy (OR = 9.0, 95% CI = 3.0 to 27.3) or sigmoidoscopy (OR = 8.8, 95% CI = 1.6 to 48.5). The risk of perforation after colonoscopy, especially for screening procedures, declined during the 8-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of perforation after colonoscopy is approximately double that after sigmoidoscopy, but this difference appears to be decreasing. These observations should be useful to clinicians making screening and diagnostic decisions for individual patients and to policy officials setting guidelines for colorectal cancer screening programs.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The vascular basis of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap.

BACKGROUND: Musculocutaneous perforator flaps, or more simply, perforator flaps, have become increasingly popular in microsurgery because of numerous advantages, including reduced donor-site morbidity. The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is a cutaneous flap based on cutaneous perforators of the thoracodorsal vessels. The objective of this study was to document the vascular anatomy of this flap in human cadaveric studies. METHODS: The anatomy of the perforators of the thoracodorsal artery was studied using a modified lead oxide-gelatin injection technique in 15 fresh human cadavers. Each fresh cadaver was injected with lead oxide, gelatin, and water, and then cooled to 4 degrees C for 24 hours before dissection. The torso was dissected to identify all cutaneous perforators in the region of the back and flank. RESULTS: The mean area of the primary and secondary zones supplied by the thoracodorsal artery was 255 cm2 and 345 cm2, respectively. The mean length of the major and minor axes was 18 cm and 13 cm, respectively. The maximum dimensions of the skin that could potentially be supplied by the thoracodorsal artery averaged 600 cm2, with a major axis length of 28 cm and a minor axis length of 27 cm. A mean number of 5.5 perforators with a mean diameter of 0.9 mm (range, 0.5 to 1.5 mm) supplied this zone. The ratio of musculocutaneous to septocutaneous perforators from the thoracodorsal artery was 3:2. The length of the thoracodorsal pedicle when harvested along with the perforator was 14.0 cm, with the vessel diameter being 2.8 mm at the origin. The most proximal perforator was seen at the level of the inferior angle of the scapula, 3.0 cm medial to the anterior border of the muscle. The intramuscular course of the perforators averaged 5 cm (range, 3 to 7 cm). Septocutaneous perforators from the thoracodorsal artery supplying the skin in addition to the musculocutaneous perforators were seen in 60 percent of specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is a reliable cutaneous perforator flap that is very useful in a wide variety of clinical applications.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Colonoscopic perforations. Etiology, diagnosis, and management.

Since its introduction into clinical medicine, flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy has had a great impact on diagnosis and management of diseases of the colon and rectum. There are three mechanisms responsible for colonoscopic perforation: specifically, mechanical perforation directly from the colonoscope or a biopsy forceps, barotrauma from overzealous air insufflation, and, finally, perforations that occur during therapeutic procedures. Perforation of the colon, which requires surgical intervention more frequently than bleeding, occurs in less than 1 percent of patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy and may be seen in up to 3 percent of patients undergoing therapeutic procedures such as polyp removal, dilation of strictures, or laser ablative procedures. Management of colonic perforation secondary to colonoscopy remains a controversial issue in that it can be effectively managed by operative and nonoperative measures. If a perforation does occur, signs and symptoms that the patient will experience will be related to both the size and site of the perforation, adequacy of the bowel preparation, amount of peritoneal soilage, underlying colonic pathology (where a thin walled colon from colitis or ischemia, for example, may result in a larger perforation than a healthy colon), and, finally, overall clinical condition of the patient. Radiology often establishes diagnosis. Plain films of the abdomen and an upright chest x-ray may reveal extravasated air confined to the bowel wall, free intraperitoneal air, retroperitoneal air, subcutaneous emphysema, or even a pneumothorax. A localized perforation may demonstrate lack of pneumoperitoneum. Some surgeons recommend surgery for all colonoscopic perforations; however, there does appear to be a role for conservative management in a select group of patients such as those with silent asymptomatic perforations and those with localized peritonitis without signs of sepsis that continue to improve clinically with conservative management. Finally, conservative management works well in those patients with postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome. Surgery is most definitely indicated in the presence of a large perforation demonstrated either colonoscopically or radiographically and in the setting of generalized peritonitis or ongoing sepsis. The presence of concomitant pathology at time of colonoscopic perforation such as a large sessile polyp likely to be a carcinoma, unremitting colitis, or perforation proximal to a nearly obstructing distal colonic lesion may force immediate surgery. Finally, in the patient who deteriorates with conservative management, one should proceed to surgery.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2007

The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The principle of early exploration on wide indications in order to prevent perforation has been the guiding star for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis for over 100 years, dating back to a time when appendicitis was a significant cause of mortality. Since then there has been a dramatic decrease in mortality due to appendicitis. Emerging evidence calls for a new understanding of the natural history of untreated appendicitis. This motivates a reappraisal of the fundamental principles for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis. METHODS: Analysis of epidemiologic and clinical studies that elucidate the natural history of appendicitis, i.e. the possibility of spontaneous resolution or the risk of progression to perforation, the determinants of the proportion of perforations and mortality, and the consequence of in-hospital delay. RESULTS: The results presented in a number of studies suggest that spontaneous resolution of appendicitis is common, that perforation can seldom be prevented, that the risk of perforation has been exaggerated and that in-hospital delay is safe. An alternative understanding of the inverse relationship between the proportion of negative explorations and perforation and the increasing proportion of perforation with length of time is presented, mainly explaining these findings by selection due to spontaneous resolution. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that spontaneous resolution of untreated, non-perforated appendicitis is common and that perforation can rarely be prevented and is associated with a lower increase in mortality than was previously thought. This motivates a shift in focus from the prevention of perforation to the early detection and treatment of advanced appendicitis. In order to minimize mortality, morbidity and costs avoidance of negative appendectomies is more important then preventing perforation. In patients with an equivocal diagnosis where advanced appendicitis is deemed less likely a correct diagnosis is more important than a rapid diagnosis. These patients can safely be managed by active observation with an improved diagnostic work-up under observation, which has consistently shown a low proportion of negative appendectomies without an increase in the proportion of perforations or morbidity. A high proportion of perforations can be explained by selection due to undiagnosed resolving appendicitis. The proportion of perforation is therefore a questionable measure of the quality of the management of patients with suspected appendicitis and should be used with caution.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed2004

Gastro-duodenal perforations: conventional plain film, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients.

INTRODUCTION: Gastro-duodenal perforations may be suspected in patients with history of ulceration, who present with acute pain and abdominal wall rigidity, but radiological findings in these cases may be unable to confirm a clinical diagnosis. The aim of our study was to report our experience in the diagnosis of gastro-duodenal perforation by conventional radiography, US and CT examinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 166 consecutive patients who presented in the last 2 years to our institutions with symptoms of acute abdomen and submitted to surgery at the Emergency Unit of the "A.Cardarelli" Hospital of Naples with a surgical finding of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer. The evidence of free intraperitoneal air on abdominal plain film was considered as a direct or suggestive finding of perforation. Evidence of intraperitoneal free fluid and/or reduced intestinal peristalsis at sonographic examination were considered indirect signs of gastro-duodenal perforation. Evidence of free peritoneal gas at CT was considered as a direct evidence of gastro-duodenal perforation. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent immediate surgery with no preoperative imaging evaluation, in 10 of them the site of perforation was found in a juxta-pyloric region and in the others at level of duodenum. In 146 patients submitted to serial radiological investigations before surgery, the site of perforation was in 56 (38.3%) duodenal, in 52 (35.6%) juxta-pyloric, in 28 (19.1%) gastric and in 10 (6.8%) pyloric. The cause of perforation was in all cases gastric or duodenal ulceration, in seven cases involving pancreatic parenchyma. In 110 (75.4%) patients with direct findings of perforation, in 94 cases (85.5%) the correct diagnosis was established on abdominal plain film, in two (1.8%) with radiographic and sonographic examinations and in 14 (12.7%) on CT findings. In 36 (24,6%) patients with no direct findings of perforation, only 24 (16,4%) of them showed indirect findings of perforation. In other 12 patients no direct or indirect finding of free peritoneal air was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience documents that in 146 gastroduodenal perforations the free peritoneal air was not evident in 12 cases and in 66% of these patients the presence of intraperitoneal fluid could be the only sign of perforation. If free peritoneal air was detected with conventional radiography, other investigations were not indicated. In the absence of direct or indirect findings of pneumoperitoneum, US examination could help to confirm intestinal paresis and the evidence of intraperitoneal free fluid. Helical CT examination was useless before at least 6h from the onset of symptomatology, because in the absence of direct or indirect findings of penumoperitoneum at abdominal plain film and sonograpy, CT could not demonstrate any additional diagnostic information.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed2002

Long-term potentiation in direct perforant path projections to the hippocampal CA3 region in vivo.

The perforant path constitutes the primary projection system relaying information from the neocortex to the hippocampal formation. Long-term synaptic potentiation (LTP) in the perforant path projections to the dentate gyrus is well characterized. However, surprisingly few studies have addressed the mechanisms underlying LTP induction in the direct perforant path projections to the hippocampus. Here we investigate the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and opioid receptors in the induction of LTP in monosynaptic medial and lateral perforant path projections to the CA3 region in adult pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rats. Similar to LTP observed at the medial perforant path-dentate gyrus synapse, medial perforant path-CA3 synapses display LTP that is blocked by both local and systemic administration of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist (+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl) propyl-1-phosphonic acid [(+/-)-CPP]. By contrast, LTP induced at the lateral perforant path-CA3 synapses is not blocked by either local or systemic administration of this NMDA receptor antagonist. The induction of LTP at lateral perforant path-CA3 synapses, which is blocked by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, is also blocked by the selective mu opioid receptor antagonist Cys(2)-Tyr(3)-Orn(5)-Pen(7)-amide (CTOP), but not the selective delta opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (NTI). CTOP was without effect on the induction of medial perforant path-CA3 LTP. The selective sensitivity of lateral perforant path-CA3 LTP to mu-opioid receptor antagonists corresponds with the distribution of mu-opioid receptors within the stratum lacunosum-moleculare of area CA3 where perforant path projections to CA3 terminate. These data indicate that both lateral and medial perforant path projections to the CA3 region display LTP, and that LTP induction in medial and lateral perforant path-CA3 synapses are differentially sensitive to NMDA receptor and mu-opioid receptor antagonists. This suggests a role for opioid, but not NMDA receptors in the induction of LTP at lateral perforant path projections to the hippocampal formation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcer perforations are a common surgical emergency, but literature is silent on the exact definition, incidence, management and complications of large perforations of duodenal ulcers. METHODS: The case files of 162 patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for duodenal ulcer perforations over a period of three years (2001 - 2003) were retrospectively reviewed and sorted into groups based on the size of the perforations - one group was defined as 'small 'perforations (less than 1 cm in diameter), another 'large' (when the perforation was more than 1 cm but less than 3 cms), and the third, 'giant'(when the perforation exceeded 3 cm). These groups of patients were then compared with each other in regard to the patient particulars, duration of symptoms, surgery performed and the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were identified to have duodenal ulcer perforations more than 1 cm in size, thus accounting for nearly 25 % of all duodenal ulcer perforations operated during this period. These patients had a significantly higher incidence of leak, morbidity and mortality when compared to those with smaller perforations. CONCLUSION: There are three distinct types of perforations of duodenal ulcers that are encountered in clinical practice. The first, are the 'small' perforations that are easy to manage and have low morbidity and mortality. The second are the 'large' perforations, that are also not uncommon, and omental patch closure gives the best results even in this subset of patients. The word 'giant' should be reserved for perforations that exceed 3 cms in diameter, and these are extremely uncommon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

John Caffey Award. Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Hydrostatic enema reduction of intussusception in children has been replaced by pneumatic reduction in a number of institutions. Colonic perforation occurs in as many as 2.8% of enema reductions, and questions persist about the relative safety of enemas performed with air vs fluid. The objectives of this study were to investigate and compare the pathologic patterns of in vivo colonic perforation and fecal spillage in young pigs given air and hydrostatic enemas, with and without the Valsalva maneuver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Colonic perforations were induced in 135 juvenile pigs. The pigs were divided into five groups, and enemas with air, barium, and water-soluble contrast material were given with and without the Valsalva maneuver to induce the perforations. During the enemas, the Valsalva maneuver was observed when the animals strained. In each animal, the enema was continued and pressure increased until a perforation was detected with fluoroscopy. Radiographic, gross, and histologic examinations of each animal were performed after perforations occurred. Differences in fecal spillage were noted, and the morphologic variations of the perforations and the surrounding tissue were determined. RESULTS: Perforations with hydrostatic (barium, water-soluble) enemas occurred at approximately 120 mm Hg of pressure (average bag height, 57 in. [143 cm]). No significant variations were found between the type of material used for contrast or the use of the Valsalva maneuver. With air enemas, perforations occurred at a mean pressure of 108 mm Hg without the Valsalva maneuver and at 145 mm Hg with the Valsalva maneuver. Perforations during air enemas did not occur during the Valsalva maneuver (pressures as high as 270 mm Hg), but rather between Valsalva maneuvers. Hydrostatic enemas produced full-thickness tears that were larger than those induced by air enemas in all cases. Air enemas with and without the Valsalva maneuver produced partial-thickness tears in 45% and 10%, respectively, of the pigs. Fecal spillage was diffuse in all hydrostatic perforations. In air enemas, spillage was focal in 55% and 90%, respectively, and absent in 45% and 10%, respectively, of perforations produced with and without the Valsalva maneuver. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that air enemas are safer than liquid enemas. Perforations that occurred during air enemas were smaller and associated with less fecal spillage and peritoneal contamination. The Valsalva maneuver appears to prevent colonic perforation during air enemas.

Animals↗