SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Literature dealing with the peripheral retina and its 'specialization for motion detection' is reviewed. The data at hand seem to indicate that the central retina is more 'specialized' for motion perception than the peripheral retina. It is clear that motion improves vision for stimuli presented peripherally.
This study compared the latencies of visually induced postural change and self-motion perception under identical visual conditions. The results showed that a visual roll stimulus elicits postural tilt in the direction of scene motion and an increase in postural instability several seconds before the subject begins to perceive illusory self-motion (vection) in the opposite direction. Postural and vection latencies correlate highly with one another, but bear little relationship with the magnitude of either sway or vection.
We describe modified random-dot stereograms in which the corresponding elements differ from non-corresponding elements in colour, size, and luminance. Despite these visible differences between the elements, depth perception collapses when the spatially integrated luminous flux is similar for the corresponding and non-corresponding elements. Our results suggest that a low-pass spatial filter precedes the mechanism that recognises disparity. A similar phenomenon is observed for the perception of coherent motion in random-dot kinematograms. Our modified stereograms and kinematograms may find other uses when experimenters wish to study the contribution of colour to visual processes and require a method of eliminating edge artifacts.
Although numerous studies have examined the relationship between smooth-pursuit eye movements and motion perception, it remains unresolved whether a common motion-processing system subserves both perception and pursuit. To address this question, we simultaneously recorded perceptual direction judgments and the concomitant smooth eye-movement response to a plaid stimulus that we have previously shown generates systematic perceptual errors. We measured the perceptual direction biases psychophysically and the smooth eye-movement direction biases using two methods (standard averaging and oculometric analysis). We found that the perceptual and oculomotor biases were nearly identical, suggesting that pursuit and perception share a critical motion processing stage, perhaps in area MT or MST of extrastriate visual cortex.
In 8 healthy subjects we studied self-motion perception and nystagmus due to sinusoidal stimulation (amplitude 90 degrees peak to peak, frequency 0.05 Hz) of the horizontal semicircular canals, the cervical proprioceptors, and the retina. We used an electrically driven rotatory chair and optokinetic drum combination. For cervical stimulation the subject's head was placed in a clamp, attached to the drum. Eye movements were recorded by means of electrooculography, d.c. amplification. Subjects signalled the estimated head position by means of a 'joystick'. In the present series of experiments the vestibular and cervical informations were played off against each other in combined stimulation conditions with an interstimulus phase lag of 0 to 315 degrees, in steps of 45 degrees. Similarly, the vestibular and visual informations were played off against each other. Concerning estimated head position, our main finding is that both the visually and the cervically induced illusion of head rotation overrule the vestibular sensation of head motion. The ocular response to combined vestibular plus cervical stimulation shows that both nystagmus slow phases and saccades of the cervical and the vestibular responses add up by vectorial summation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Previous studies of the motion aperture problem have shown that the direction of grating motion can be biased by using binocular disparity to designate borders of the aperture as intrinsic (belonging to the grating) or extrinsic (resulting from occlusion of the grating). Observers report motion in the direction of the extrinsic border, as if the grating was extended and moving underneath an occluding surface. Here we investigate whether prior information about depth ordering, given by structure-from-motion, can bias the perceived motion direction of a subsequent moving grating in a similar manner. We presented an aperture stimulus that rotated about its vertical and horizontal axes, revealing the depth relationships (intrinsic and extrinsic) of the aperture borders. The grating then translated within the aperture and observers reported the direction of perceived motion. The test stimulus contained no information about the depth ordering of the scene. We found that observers' reported motion shifted toward the direction of the occluding edges, consistent with the intrinsic-extrinsic border predictions. These results indicate that prior scene information, not just depth information explicitly defined in the test stimulus, is used to help solve the motion aperture problem.
Human perception of horizontal self(body)-motion in space was studied during various combinations of vestibular and leg-proprioceptive stimuli in the dark. During sinusoidal rotations of the trunk relative to the stationary feet (functionally synergistic combination) the perception was almost veridical over the frequency range tested (0.025-0.4 Hz). This finding suggested a dominance of the proprioceptive over the vestibular input, since the quantitative aspects of the perception (gain, phase, and detection threshold): (a) closely resembled those of the proprioceptive foot-to-trunk perception, and (b) clearly differed from those of the vestibular self-motion perception. However, when using other combinations, the self-motion perception changed in a monotonous way as a function of the two inputs, indicating that the two inputs do interact in a linear way. In a model of these findings the interaction occurs in two stages: (1) summation of a vestibular trunk-in-space signal and a (dynamically matched) proprioceptive foot-to-trunk signal yields an internal representation of foot support motion in space; (2) superposition of the latter by an almost ideal proprioceptive trunk-to-foot signal results in a representation of trunk-in-space motion (essentially proprioception-dependent and ideal when the feet are stationary).
PURPOSE: To study the features of the motion perception (MP) and explore the worth of the clinical application of MP test in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: MPs were recorded from 41 patients (67 eyes) with POAG ang 56 normal subjects (112 eyes) by the MP software in PC compatible computer. Meanwhile, the MP ways and MP sites were analyzed and MP abnormal rate was compared to the clinical parameters and the visual function indices related to glaucoma. RESULTS: The results showed that the total abnormal rate of MP was 89.5% in POAG, and the abnormal rate was 81.6% in early stage of POAG, and MP abnormal degree had positive correlation with C/D, ocular tension and corrected loss variance (CLV), and negative correlation with visual acuity and mean sensitivity (MS), and no correlation with age and short-term fluctuation (SF) in the patients with POAG. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the MP test provides a newly effective examination method in diagnosing the early POAG.
In a series of experiments psychophysical techniques were used to study the relation between binocular rivalry and motion perception. An initial series of experiments confirmed that motion enhances the predominance of an eye during rivalry, although the direction of motion does not matter. The presence of an annulus of motion immediately surrounding one eye's rival target greatly enhances dominance of that target, but the influence of the annulus progressively decreases as the separation between disk and annulus increased. Opponent directions of motion in disk and annulus yield greater dominance than when dots in the disk and annulus moved in identical directions. In a second experiment that two eyes were adapted to orthogonal directions of motion, generating strong, distinctively different monocular motion aftereffects (MAEs). Even though the two eyes view physically identical random-motion displays following differential adaptation, binocular rivalry of the discrepant MAEs can occur. Finally, using a stimulus replacement technique to measure detectability of translational and rotational motion, it was found that both types of motion were readily detected during periods of dominance but went undetected during periods of suppression. Taken together, these results bear on the process responsible for rivalry and its neural locus relative to the analysis of different types of motion.
Do locomotor aftereffects depend specifically on visual feedback? In 7 experiments, 116 college students were tested, with closed eyes, at stationary running or at walking to a previewed target after adaptation, with closed eyes, to treadmill locomotion. Subjects showed faster inadvertent drift during stationary running and increased distance (overshoot) when walking to a target. Overshoot seemed to saturate (i.e., reach a ceiling) at 17% after as little as 1 min of adaptation. Sidestepping at test reduced overshoot, suggesting motor specificity. But inadvertent drift effects were decreased if the eyes were open and the treadmill was drawn through the environment during adaptation, indicating that these effects involve self-motion perception. Differences in expression of inadvertent drift and of overshoot after adaptation to treadmill locomotion may have been due to different sets of ancillary cues available for the 2 tasks. Self-motion perception is multimodal.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of human magnocellular (M)-pathway disruption on global motion perception. Coherence thresholds for global motion direction discrimination in random dot patterns were determined at slow and moderate dot speeds: (1) after adaptation to full-field sinusoidal flicker or a steady gray field, and (2) on a red or a gray background. Adaptation to flicker and a red background increased motion coherence thresholds relative to the gray baseline conditions at both dot speeds. Physiological studies have shown that M cells in the retina and LGN are inhibited by red light and are a main contributor to flicker perception in monkeys. Therefore, our results suggest that interference with processing in the subcortical M pathway disrupts higher-level motion integration.
In this paper a computational scheme for motion perception in artificial and natural vision systems is described. The scheme is motivated by a mathematical analysis in which first-order spatial properties of optical flow, such as singular points and elementary components of optical flow, are shown to be salient features for the computation and analysis of visual motion. The fact that different methods for the computation of optical flow produce similar results is explained in terms of the simple spatial structure of the image motion of rigid bodies. Singular points and elementary flow components are used to compute motion parameters, such as time-to-collision and angular velocity, and also to segment the visual field into areas which correspond to different motions. Then a number of biological implications are discussed. Electrophysiological findings suggest that the brain perceives visual motion by detecting and analysing optical flow components. However, the cortical neurons, which seem to detect elementary flow components, are not able to extract these components from more complex flows. A simple model for the organization of the receptive field of these cells, which is consistent with anatomical and electrophysiological data, is described at the end of the paper.
The combination of visual motion information over visual space (spatial summation) and stimulus duration (temporal integration) was investigated using a random-pixel array (spatiotemporally broad-band) apparent motion stimulus designed to isolate specific populations of visual motion detectors. The results indicate that, in agreement with results from spatiotemporally narrow-band stimuli, spatial summation follows the form of linear probabilistic summation rather than non-linear probabilistic summation. Linear probabilistic summation holds for a wide range of stimulus parameters and when changing either motion stimulus height or width. Linear probabilistic summation breaks down when the motion display region approaches a height and/or width that is related to the spatial displacement size, not the speed, of the random-pixel array. This height and width (termed the critical height and width, or critical dimension), increases with spatial displacement size and can be interpreted as a measure of the basic dimensions of the selected motion detector population's receptive field. The critical height is smaller than the critical width, a result that is consistent with a motion detector receptive field that is elongated in the direction of motion. Perhaps most importantly, the mechanisms of temporal integration and spatial summation can work independently under a wide range of conditions. Finally, the results provide evidence for a short-term inhibitory phenomenon from the edges of the useful display area that affects the visibility of the motion.
Two low-level motion models are applied to a second-order stimulus, a translating contrast modulation of static binary noise. Both models have been used to demonstrate equivalence between energy and gradient algorithms and can be split into a motion-opponent stage followed by a contrast-normalised stage. Analysis of results shows no directional bias at the motion-opponent stage but a strong bias, indicating the correct direction of second-order motion, at the contrast-normalised stage. This demonstrates that the intrinsically non-linear process of contrast-normalisation may play a part in the detection of second-order motion.
It is widely assumed that combining the eye movement vector with the motion vector of the retinal image is both sufficient and necessary for recovering the direction and speed of visual motion. Here, we report that execution of a saccadic (rapid) eye movement in the dark systematically biased subsequent perceptual judgment of the direction of visual motion in the direction opposite to the saccade. This non-veridical motion perception reached a maximum immediately after saccade offset and then decayed in approximately equal to 100 ms. These results suggest that the oculomotor signal interacts with central mechanisms related to motion and possibly form perception, as well as spatial vision, as documented with mislocalization of visual objects at the time of saccades.
Max Wertheimer's 1912 monograph on apparent motion is a seminal contribution to the study of visual motion, but its actual contents are not widely known. This article attempts to clarify what the monograph did and did not contribute, emphasizing links between Wertheimer's principal findings and the results of subsequent investigations of motion perception, including currently active lines of research. The topics discussed include Wertheimer's experimental tests of explanations for apparent motion; his work with motion phenomena that lie between succession and optimum motion; his studies of the influence of attention on motion; explorations of various forms of hysteresis and motion transparency; and Wertheimer's work with a motion-blind patient.
Perception of apparent motion operates somewhat differently for objects and human figures. Depending on the interstimulus interval, the latter d may give rise to either perception of a direct path (i.e. biologically impossible) or indirect path (i.e. biologically possible). Here, PET was used to investigate whether a change in brain activity accompanies this perceptual shift. We found neural encoding of apparent motion to be a function of the intrinsic properties of the stimulus presented (object vs human) as well as the kind of human movement path perceived (biomechanically possible vs impossible). Motor and parietal cortex were only involved for possible motion which suggests that these regions are selectively activated to process actions which conform to the capabilities of the observer.