Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Manometry”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: interobserver variability.

To determine the frequency and magnitude of interobserver variability, 50 sphincter of Oddi manometry tracings were read by three separate physicians experienced in reading such manometry. Ninety station pull-throughs were read, and attention was focused on the reference duodenal baseline pressure and two methods of reading the basal sphincter pressure. A high degree of correlation was found among the three observers with correlation coefficients of > 0.9 for reading baseline duodenal and basal sphincter pressures. Differences in basal sphincter pressure readings were greatest in patients with very high basal sphincter pressure. The most clinically relevant parameter was thought to be the mean basal sphincter pressure. All three observers agreed on normal (mean basal pressure < or = 40 mm Hg) versus abnormal (mean basal pressure > 40 mm Hg) in 82% to 90% of tracings. When the definition of agreement was broadened to include patients with pressures of 40 +/- 3 mm Hg (37 to 43 mm Hg), the observers agreed 87% to 94% of the time. Overall, these findings are thought to indicate that interobserver variability for reading sphincter of Oddi manometry is minimal when the observers are experienced in reading these tracings.

Humans↗

Post-cholecystectomy patients with "objective signs" of partial bile outflow obstruction: clinical characteristics, sphincter of Oddi manometry findings, and results of therapy.

Seventeen patients, 15 women and 2 men with upper abdominal pain categorized to biliary group I suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, underwent thorough clinical evaluation including ERCP and endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry. All the patients were subsequently treated by endoscopic (n = 15) or surgical (n = 2) sphincterotomy. The mean age of patients studied was 62 years. They all had cholecystectomy several years previously (median, 18 years). At ERCP all patients showed a large common bile duct dilation (mean diameter, 18 mm) and delayed contrast drainage greater than 45 minutes. Sphincter of Oddi manometry, although abnormal in most patients, revealed normal sphincter of Oddi pressure in six patients (35%). Nonetheless, sphincterotomy resulted in relief of symptoms in all (mean follow-up, 28 months; range, 3 to 46 months), thus suggesting that their pain was indeed caused by the disordered sphincter of Oddi. These findings support the previous assumption that in symptomatic post-cholecystectomy patients the triad of elevated liver function tests, dilated common bile duct, and delayed contrast drainage at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography indicates a definitive sphincter of Oddi abnormality. The normal sphincter of Oddi pressures in many of these patients are probably due to a different, noncompliant type of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Because these patients invariably benefit from sphincterotomy, sphincter of Oddi manometry in this category is not only unnecessary, but it may also be misleading.

Adult↗

Follow-up studies on patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication utilizing intraoperative manometry.

Intraoperative esophageal manometry has been developed for use in children as a guide to optimizing the surgical results of Nissen fundoplication. Eighty-two Nissen fundoplication operations were performed using intraoperative manometry. Follow-up manometry was performed within 6 wk postoperatively in 45 patients and later than 6 wk postoperatively in 33 patients. The mean preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was 13 mm Hg. The mean postoperative LESP was 42 mm Hg. LESP was found to drop in the early postoperative period nearly 40%. There was minimal further decline in LESP between the early and late follow-up determinations. Lower esophageal sphincter length (LESL) was measured both pre- and postoperatively in 56 patients with an average increase of 1.4 cm. There was a very mild decline in LESL in the late follow-up period. The clinical course of these patients was correlated with manometric findings. The routine use of gastrostomy has been found to be unnecessary.

Adolescent↗

The effect of ketamine anesthesia on anorectal manometry.

Two hundred and twenty-five patients aged from neonate to 15 years presenting with chronic constipation and soiling had anorectal manometry without sedation, and 142 patients in the same age range and with a similar range of presenting complaints had anorectal manometry using ketamine as an anesthetic. There were no significant differences between the groups in the resting pressures recorded in the anal canal, in the amount of inhibition with rectal distension, or in the frequency or amplitude of rhythmical activity of the internal anal sphincter. Classical inhibitory troughs were seen when expected in both groups as were signs of external sphincter activity. Ketamine anaesthesia is a suitable sedative which enables anorectal manometry to be performed on young or nervous patients and does not alter the qualitative or quantitative responses.

Adolescent↗

A comparison of anal endosonography with electromyography and manometry in high and intermediate anorectal anomalies.

Anal endosonography, electromyography (EMG) of the external anal sphincter (EAS), and manometry of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) were performed in 15 patients with anorectal anomalies (10 with high and five with intermediate anomalies), ranging in age from 8 to 18 years. The anal endosonographic findings were compared with those for the EMG of the EAS and manometry of the IAS. An image including the hyperechoic band that corresponds to the EAS was obtained in all 15 patients. However, the distribution of EAS image was inadequate in high anomalies. In four patients who showed in Kelly score of 5 or 6, good visualization of the EAS was obtained in both anal endosonography and EMG. An Image including the hypoechoic band that corresponds to the IAS was obtained in five patients with high anomalies and in one with intermediate anomalies. Therefore, even in patients with anomalies, at these levels the IAS could be ultrasonically detected. However, only one of these six patients exhibited an anorectal reflex. These results indicate that, for the EAS, the findings of anal endosonography correspond well with those of EMG, but that for the IAS, they do not correspond with those of manometry. At the time of surgery for anorectal anomalies care should taken to preserve the IAS, which can be detected by anal endosonography even in patients with high or intermediate anomalies.

Adolescent↗

Outcome of Nissen fundoplication using intraoperative manometry in children.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative manometry is useful in performing Nissen fundoplication (NF) in children. Long-term clinical outcome information after use of this method is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective review of the outcomes of 62 consecutive NFs using intraoperative manometry was performed. The follow-up period was 3.4 years. Approximately half of the patients were neurologically normal (NN) and half were neurologically impaired (NI). All patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) did not respond to an adequate trial of medical treatment. RESULTS: The NF was tailored to result in a twofold increase in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and a 75% increase in the LES length (LESL). An accelerated growth rate in 40% of "failure to thrive" (FTT) patients was demonstrated. Eighty-four percent of caregivers reported improved quality of life after NF. There was a twofold reduction in the number of hospital admissions and a sixfold reduction in total inpatient days for both NI and NN children. The early and late mortality rate was 13%, and the complication rate was similar to other series reported in the literature, with more complications occurring in NI patients. There was a 2% incidence of wrap herniation. An improvement in long-term outcomes after NF was seen in 89% of NN children and over half of NI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative manometry is useful in standardizing the tightness of the wrap in NF. There was a low incidence of complications, dysphagia, recurrent emesis, and GERD in this series. Long-term outcomes using this technique were deemed very good based on caregivers' responses.

Adolescent↗

Use of colonic manometry to differentiate causes of intractable constipation in children.

We evaluated colon manometry as a means of differentiating causes of intractable constipation in children. We studied pressure changes in the transverse, descending, and rectosigmoid colons of 23 children with intractable constipation. All patients had a history of less than one bowel movement per week for longer than 2 years without resolution after conventional medical management. The possibility of Hirschsprung disease was excluded in all. On the basis of pathologic and manometric studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract, 10 patients had a diagnosis of gastrointestinal neuropathy and two had a diagnosis of myopathy. The other 11 patients had functional fecal retention; this diagnosis was based on history and outcome of therapy. On the day of study we used endoscopy to place a manometry catheter into the transverse colon and recorded intraluminal pressure for longer than 4 hours. After obtaining a baseline recording, we gave the patient a meal to assess gastrocolonic response. Colonic contractions were recorded in 21 of 23 children. Children with functional fecal retention could be differentiated from those with neuropathy by examination of the postprandial record. After a meal children with functional fecal retention had (1) an increase in motility index (3.4 +/- 0.5 while fasting vs 9.1 +/- 1.3 postprandially; p less than 0.001), and (2) at least one high-amplitude propagated contraction (in 10 of 11 children). The patients with neuropathy had no high-amplitude propagated contractions (p less than 0.001 vs group with functional fecal retention) and motility index in these children did not increase significantly after a meal (2.7 +/- 1.0 while fasting vs 2.9 +/- 1.3 postprandially). The two children with hollow visceral myopathy had no contractions. We conclude that in children with severe chronic constipation the colonic results of manometry differentiate patients with functional fecal retention from those with neuropathy or myopathy of the colon.

Child↗

Esophageal manometry: assessment of interpreter consistency.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Manometry is used widely in the evaluation of esophageal disorders. Our aim was to assess the intra- and interobserver reliability of esophageal manometry and identify potential causes for diagnostic variability. METHODS: Seventy-two esophageal manometry tracings were selected randomly from archives. Eight interpreters randomly and blindly evaluated tracings. Interpreters were divided into 3 groups: highly experienced (N = 3), moderately experienced (N = 3), and inexperienced (N = 2). Each tracing was examined for abnormalities involving the lower-esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body. Interpreters rendered a single diagnosis from a list of 7 manometric diagnoses: normal, nutcracker, hypertensive LES, hypotensive LES, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), nonspecific/ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and achalasia. Intra- and interobserver agreements were determined and reasons for varied diagnoses were investigated. RESULTS: Overall intraobserver agreement was good (kappa = .63, P < .0001). There was no difference ( P = .9) between the highly and midexperienced interpreters (kappa = .61 and .65, respectively). Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of achalasia and normal motility was good (kappa = .65 and .56, respectively). However, other manometric diagnoses yielded only fair interobserver agreement (kappa = .27). DES, nonspecific/ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and hypo- and hypertensive LES diagnoses showed the least agreement. Poor adherence to established manometric criteria, misinterpretation of intrabolus pressure, and technical inadequacy were the most common sources of inconsistency in interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: Manometric diagnoses of conditions other than normal or achalasia are variable and have poor interobserver variability. Given their uncertain clinical implications, we must either redefine them or eliminate them from practice.

Adult↗

Clinical use of manometry for the diagnosis of intestinal motor abnormalities.

Digestive symptoms suggestive of intestinal motor disorders, such as abdominal pain and distension, fullness, vomiting, constipation and diarrhoea, are very common and non-specific, and may be clinical manifestations of both organic and functional diseases. Both radiology and endoscopy are important in the diagnosis of structural gastrointestinal lesions that can affect motility and offer indirect signs of impaired gastrointestinal functions, but the diagnosis of gut motility disorders currently relies on the manometric assessment of contractile activities. Small bowel manometry helps to identify normal motility features and consequently to identify abnormal motor patterns. Small bowel manometry can help to differentiate mechanical obstruction from pseudo-obstruction and neurogenic from myogenic motor disorders. Manometry is an invasive technique which is not well accepted by patients and requires specific skills from investigators. Also, manometric assessment is limited to referral centres with a specific interest in the field of digestive functions, in general, and motility, in particular. Only patients who remain undiagnosed after extensive traditional work-up and fail repeated courses with medical therapy should be referred for the manometric test. Understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of abnormal motility and developing new therapies are the goals of the current research in this fascinating field of medicine.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Simultaneous endoluminal sonography and manometry to assess anal sphincter complex in normal subjects.

The purpose of this study was to use simultaneous anal manometry and high-frequency endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS) to determine the relationship between resting anal pressure and cross-sectional area of the internal and external anal sphincters. Eleven normal subjects underwent simultaneous anal EUS and manometry using catheters containing both pressure ports and ultrasound transducers. Resting pressure and cross-sectional area of the sphincters were made throughout the anal sphincter complex. The length of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) by sonography (27+/-5 mm) was significantly less than the length of the high pressure zone (HPZ) by manometry (44+/-8 mm; P < 0.001). Maximum IAS cross-sectional area (CSA) occurred 10+/-6 mm proximal to the peak resting pressure. The resting anal pressure correlated with external anal sphincter (EAS) CSA (r = 0.77), but not with IAS CSA (r = -0.17). The sum of EAS CSA and IAS CSA correlated strongly with resting pressure (r = 0.85). In conclusion, the IAS is shorter than the HPZ, with a significant distance separating maximum IAS CSA from peak resting pressure. The sum of the IAS and EAS CSAs, but not that of the IAS alone, correlated with resting pressure. Thus, this study suggests that the EAS, in addition to the IAS, contributes to resting anal pressure.

Adult↗

A pneumatically driven pump for constant perfusion manometry.

Syringe pumps are almost universally used for constant perfusion oesophageal manometry, despite important technical limitations. A pneumatically driven perfusion pump has been designed specifically for oesophageal manometry. This pump requires less than one third the flow setting of a syringe pump to achieve a given rate of pressure rise. It is simple to operate and needs infrequent refilling. Nearly two years' practical experience with this pump has confirmed its superiority over the syringe pump for constant perfusion manometry.

Air Pressure↗

Combining the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter with manometry for the assessment of faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The strength-duration curve of a muscle is thought to be a measure of its innervation. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter to discriminate between controls and patients with faecal incontinence. METHODS: Forty-three women with faecal incontinence due to sphincter weakness were studied together with 45 age-matched women with no disorders of defaecation. Strength-duration curves of the external anal sphincter and anorectal manometry were recorded for all subjects with the additional measurement of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in the incontinent group. RESULTS: Logistic regression was performed using resting and voluntary squeeze pressures and current strengths at 28 different pulse durations to develop a predictive equation for incontinence. Only currents at 1 and 6 ms were significant predictors. When anorectal manometry data were included, only the current required to elicit contraction at 1 ms was necessary. The following regression equation can be applied to predict continence in this population with a sensitivity of 95 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent: logit(P)=4.1605-(0.0559 x squeeze pressure)-(0.1755 x resting pressure)+0.8622I(1 ms). A negative value indicates continence. CONCLUSION: The strength-duration curve, when used in conjunction with anorectal manometry, may have a role in the investigation of faecal incontinence.

Adult↗

Ileal manometry in children following ileostomies and pull-through operations.

Our aim was to analyse the patterns of ileal contractions in children. We reviewed the charts of 23 children who had ileal manometry studies (16 males), mean age 7 years (range 2 months to 17 years). We positioned the manometry catheters with 4-8 recording sites, 5 or 15 cm apart, through ileostomies fashioned for clinically indicated reasons. We studied six additional children with persistent faecal soiling following endorectal pull through for Hirschsprung's disease; the catheters were positioned through the anus and colon into the ileum. We recorded phasic and tonic intermittent contractions in all the subjects, clustered contractions (rate 5-9 min-1, duration 20-120 s) in 19 subjects with ileostomies and four with endorectal pull throughs. In 13 children there were prolonged propagated contractions, > 60 mmHg in amplitude, > 15 s in duration, propagating at rates of 2-6 cm s-1 over at least 20 cm. The migrating motor complex was rare; in 55 h of fasting recording there were two phase III sequences. There are four distinctive features of ileal manometry recordings in children: random intermittent contractions, clustered contractions, prolonged propagated contractions and tonic contractions. The features of ileal motility differ from motility in the proximal small bowel.

Adolescent↗

Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) assesses esophageal function by simultaneous measurement of both pressure and bolus transit. Normative data for this method have not been published. The aim of this study was to establish normative data for combined MII-EM and to correlate liquid and viscous bolus transit by impedance with esophageal contractions by manometry. METHODS: Forty-three normal volunteers recruited from 4 centers (15 women, 28 men; age range, 21-72 years) underwent combined MII-EM with a catheter containing 4 impedance-measuring segments and 4 solid-state pressure transducers. Each center recruited and analyzed subjects independently, according to pre-established criteria. Each subject received 20 x 5 mL swallows, 10 liquid and 10 viscous material. Tracings were analyzed manually for bolus presence time, bolus head advance time, segmental transit times, total bolus transit time, contraction amplitude, duration, and onset velocity. RESULTS: Ninety-seven and four-tenths percent of manometrically normal liquid and 96.1% of manometrically normal viscous swallows had complete bolus transit by impedance. Almost half (47.2%) of manometrically ineffective liquid and 34.7% of ineffective viscous swallows had complete bolus transit, whereas 91.7% of manometric simultaneous liquid swallows and 54.5% of simultaneous viscous swallows had complete bolus transit. More than 93% of normal individuals had at least 80% complete liquid or at least 70% complete viscous bolus transit. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes normative data for combined MII-EM. Combined MII-EM may be a more sensitive tool in assessing esophageal function compared to standard manometry because impedance can distinguish different bolus transit patterns. Studies in patients with manometrically defined esophageal motility abnormalities should help clarify the functional importance of manometric ineffective and simultaneous swallows.

Adult↗

Reliability of anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease.

Anorectal manometry was performed in 79 patients, aged 2 days to 19 years, who were referred to us because of constipation or symptoms of intestinal obstruction. A definitive diagnosis was obtained in 75 of the 79 patients (95%). Thus, anorectal manometry is a reliable tool in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. In the neonatal period, however, a definite diagnosis was possible in only 17 of the 21 neonates (81%). The age at the time of the first examination was 14 +/- 2 days in those with a definite diagnosis and 5 +/- 1 days in those with an indefinite diagnosis (p less than 0.001). If intestinal obstruction can be managed by conservative therapy, examination should be repeated after two weeks of age if the diagnosis before one week of age is not definite. These results indicate that anorectal manometry is non-invasive and reliable in the diagnosis of Hirschprung's disease. However, further examinations such as barium enema or rectal biopsy should be done, even in the neonatal period.

Anal Canal↗

ERCP, biliary crystal analysis, and sphincter of Oddi manometry in idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the role of ERCP, analysis of bile for microcrystals, and sphincter of Oddi manometry in idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients met criteria for idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Patients with a normal ERCP underwent sphincter of Oddi manometry and analysis of bile. Bile was also collected in patients with papillary stenosis (defined as ductal dilation with delayed drainage of contrast, sphincter basal pressures greater than 40 mm Hg, and positive analysis for cholesterol and/or calcium bilirubinate crystals). RESULTS: ERCP alone identified a cause of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis in 47 (37%) patients: papillary stenosis in 26 (21%), pancreas divisum in 9 (7%), and choledocholithiasis in 6 (5%). Among patients with a gallbladder, microcrystals were found in 27 (50%) and sphincter dysfunction in 17 (31%). Among patients who have undergone cholecystectomy, sphincter dysfunction was identified in 24 (47%). Minor papilla sphincterotomy was performed in 8 patients (89%) with pancreas divisum. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 85 patients and included all patients with choledocholithiasis, choledochocele, microcrystals, papillary stenosis, and sphincter dysfunction except 2 patients with microcrystals who underwent cholecystectomy. Additionally, pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed in 32 (78%) patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension and in 6 (23%) of 26 patients with papillary stenosis with dilated pancreatic ducts. Thus, among the 126 patients, 93 of the 100 patients with a detected abnormality underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Response rates varied from 67% to 100% during follow-up (mean 29.6 months, range 18 to 33 months). CONCLUSION: ERCP techniques including minor papilla cannulation, analysis of bile for microcrystals, and sphincter of Oddi manometry identified a cause of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis in 79% (endoscopically treatable in 75%) of patients, with or without prior cholecystectomy.

Adolescent↗

Long-term outcome of endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy in patients with manometry-documented sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and normal pancreatogram.

BACKGROUND: For patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and abnormal pancreatic basal sphincter pressure, additional pancreatic sphincterotomy has been recommended. The outcome of endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy in patients with manometry-documented sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was evaluated. METHODS: An ERCP database was searched for data entered from January 1995 to November 2000 on patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who met the following parameters: sphincter of Oddi manometry of both ducts, abnormal pressure for at least 1 sphincter (> or =40 mm Hg), no evidence of chronic pancreatitis, and endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy. Patients were offered reintervention by repeat ERCP if clinical symptoms were not improved. The frequency of reintervention was analyzed according to ducts with abnormal basal sphincter pressure, previous cholecystectomy, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type, and endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy method. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients were followed for a mean of 43.1 months (median, 41.0 months; interquartile range: 29.8-60.0 months). Immediate postendoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy complications occurred in 15% of patients. Reintervention was required in 24.6% of patients at a median follow-up (interquartile range) of 8.0 (5.5-22.5) months. The frequency of reintervention was similar irrespective of ducts with abnormal basal sphincter pressure, previous cholecystectomy, or endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy method. Of patients with type III sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, 28.3% underwent reintervention compared with 20.4% with combined types I and II sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (p = 0.105). When compared with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy alone in historical control patients from our unit, endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy had a lower reintervention rate in patients with pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfuntion alone and a comparable outcome in those with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction of both ducts. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy is useful in patients with pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Prospective randomized trials of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy alone versus endoscopic dual pancreatobiliary sphincterotomy based on sphincter of Oddi manometry findings are in progress.

Adolescent↗

Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal function testing was developed to aid diagnosis in patients with negative endoscopy. Although combined 24-h esophageal pH-manometry is now commercially available, its routine clinical effectiveness has not yet been studied. METHODS: From 1992 to 1996 we evaluated 303 consecutive patients who were first-time referrals to our unit for 24-h esophageal pH-manometry. The referral indications were gastroesophageal reflux disease, 47.2%; dysphagia, 18.5%; non-cardiac chest pain, 14.9%; connective tissue disease, 13.2%; and symptomatic patients after antireflux surgery, 6.3%. RESULTS: Overall, esophageal function testing altered the diagnosis of 44% of the patients, confirmed it in 38%, and specifically changed the management of 66%. The final clinical 'diagnosis' was reflux disease, 54% (32% with non-specific esophageal motility disorder); connective tissue disease, 9.9%; achalasia, 9.6%; other specific esophageal motility disorders, 3.3%; non-specific esophageal motility disorders, 6.9%; and normal, 16.2%. The cost per testing was estimated to be US$305 and per change in management US$465. CONCLUSION: Combined 24-h pH-manometry has been shown to be a useful and cost-effective test for the management of selected patients in whom the primary investigation was insufficient.

Adolescent↗