Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Levodopa”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics with multiple tolcapone doses in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: The multiple-dose tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tolcapone, a novel catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, were assessed in healthy elderly volunteers receiving concomitant carbidopa and levodopa. METHODS: Thirty-six volunteers from 55 to 75 years old participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending multiple-dose study. Tolcapone was studied at dosages of 100, 200, 400, or 800 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) in four sequential groups. Each group consisted of nine participants who had been randomized to receive either placebo (n = 3) or tolcapone (n = 6). Tolcapone or placebo was coadministered with carbidopa and levodopa (25 and 100 mg, respectively) for 7 days. Assessments included tolerability, pharmacokinetics of tolcapone, levodopa, and 3-O-methyldopa, and inhibition of COMT activity in erythrocytes. RESULTS: By inhibiting COMT, tolcapone reduced levodopa metabolism to 3-O-methyldopa, resulting in a twofold increase in levodopa exposure (area under the curve) and elimination half-life, without changing levodopa peak plasma concentration. These effects were similar on days 1 and 7 of treatment. Development of tolerance to COMT inhibition was not observed. Onset of effect was rapid (day 1 of treatment), and the maximum effect on levodopa pharmacokinetics was already observed with 100 or 200 mg tolcapone t.i.d. At these dosages, tolcapone pharmacokinetics were linear and stable; accumulation occurred with 800 mg t.i.d. The combination of tolcapone and carbidopa-levodopa was generally well tolerated, although more nausea and vomiting were observed at higher dosages (400 to 800 mg t.i.d.), particularly in women. CONCLUSION: Tolcapone shows promise as an effective adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Clinical pharmacology data indicate that the therapeutic regimen should be 100 or 200 mg t.i.d.

Administration, Oral↗

Population pharmacodynamic modeling of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease receiving entacapone.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacodynamics of levodopa among patients with Parkinson's disease showing end-of-dose fluctuations at different doses of entacapone. METHODS: Nineteen patients participated in a randomized, double-blind phase II study with a crossover design. Doses of 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg entacapone or placebo were given with the patient's individual levodopa-dopa decarboxylase inhibitor dose. Blood samples were withdrawn for pharmacokinetic analysis, and the clinical response was measured using the motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. A population pharmacodynamic model was developed with the NONMEM program. RESULTS: A sigmoidal Emax model with an effect compartment was used to relate plasma concentrations of levodopa with clinical response. In the population analysis two covariate relationships were found. The first was E0 = 55.2, [1 + 0.012. (Dur-13)], where E0 is the initial motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score, and Dur is the duration of disease in years. The second was C50(carbidopa) = 951 ng/ml; C50(benserazide) = 1238 ng/ml, where C50 is the steady-state plasma concentration of levodopa eliciting half of maximum attainable effect, and carbidopa and benserazide are the dopa decarboxylase inhibitors given in the study. No effect of entacapone on clinical response beyond its influence on levodopa pharmacokinetics was found. Interindividual and interoccasion variabilities were estimated. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacodynamic model for levodopa was built that took into account interindividual and intraindividual variability. The main finding was that entacapone does not alter the concentration-effect curve of levodopa, suggesting that entacapone acts at the level of peripheral pharmacokinetics of levodopa and that plasma levels of 3-O-methyldopa have a negligible role in the pharmacodynamics of levodopa.

Aged↗

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pramipexole in untreated and levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the non-ergot dopamine agonist pramipexole in untreated and levodopa-treated Chinese patients with early or advanced Parkinson's disease. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, which was conducted in Hong Kong and Taiwan, comprised a screening period of at least 1 week, a dose-escalation period of 7 weeks, and a maintenance period of 8 weeks (total duration of treatment: 15 weeks). During the dose-escalation period, the dose of pramipexole (or number of placebo tablets) was escalated in a blinded fashion according to a predetermined schedule to the optimum tolerated dose of pramipexole, administered three times a day (minimum dose=0.375 mg/day; maximum dose=4.5 mg/day). This dose was then maintained for the duration of the maintenance period. Efficacy was primarily assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by treatment-emergent adverse event reports, clinical laboratory test results (blood chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), vital signs, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Pramipexole was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the total scores of the UPDRS Part II, Part III, and Parts II and III combined. Approximately 70% of both the placebo- and pramipexole-treated patients evaluated in this analysis were on levodopa. Regardless of levodopa use, the mean UPDRS total scores showed a consistently greater improvement in pramipexole patients than in placebo patients. Mean scores for pramipexole patients not on levodopa showed a greater improvement than did pramipexole patients on levodopa. The mean improvement for the pramipexole/no levodopa group relative to the placebo/no levodopa group at week 15 was 10.93 points (i.e., -14.43 points minus -3.50 points). The mean improvement for the pramipexole/levodopa group relative to the placebo/levodopa group at week 15 was 9.04 points (i.e., -10.26 points minus -1.22 points). Pramipexole was also superior to placebo as measured by improvement in the modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale and a reduction in the number of "off" hours for patients on concomitant levodopa therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pramipexole is an effective and well-tolerated therapy, with or without concomitant levodopa, for Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease.

Adult↗

Acute effects of levodopa on wrist movement in Parkinson's disease. Kinematics, volitional EMG modulation and reflex amplitude modulation.

Acute changes in motor performance due to levodopa were evaluated by a series of four motor tests unified by their focus on wrist flexion-extension movements. Subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were evaluated with this battery of tests before (OFF) and after their usual morning dose of levodopa (ON). The test battery consisted of (i) repetitive self-paced movement in which velocity was to be maximized; (ii) visually guided tracking of a sinusoid and a square wave; and (iii) an assay of stretch reflex modulation during volitional sinusoidal tracking. The maximal wrist joint velocity of self-paced reciprocating flexion and extension movements increased after levodopa (ON), without significant changes in the movement period or amplitude. In the two tracking tasks, some subjects improved as evident by a lower root mean square (rms) error, but in similar numbers of subjects the rms error increased. Overall, the rms error, peak velocity or peak movement amplitude did not change after levodopa in either tracking task. Significant and consistent changes did occur after levodopa in an assay of reflex modulation during error-constrained tracking (Johnson et al., Brain 1991; 114: 443-60). The amplitude of volitional EMG increased after levodopa, with a concurrent reduction in reflex EMG. These changes are consistent with the noted increase in movement velocity. These results show that the effects of levodopa on movement velocity were not consistently translated into increased accuracy. The changes in the long latency reflex gain argue for a central control of this reflex, mediated by structures sensitive to levodopa. Finally, the results show that the quantitative evaluation of levodopa therapy cannot be unidimensional, but requires a battery of motor tests as undertaken in this study.

Aged↗

Levodopa does not aggravate postural tremor in Parkinson's disease.

Characterization of postural tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) is incomplete. It was suggested to be an exaggerated physiological tremor and to be enhanced by the action of levodopa. We compared the magnitude of postural tremor to the magnitude of rest tremor and to plasma levodopa levels in 20 PD patients, 10 with stable motor response to oral levodopa, and 10 with the wearing-off phenomenon. Tremor assessment included motor scores of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and accelerometric measurements. Accelerometric data showed that the absolute power of both rest and postural basal dominant tremor frequencies significantly diminished with the increase in plasma levodopa levels and increased with their decrease. Tremor frequencies were also significantly changed by levodopa, which slowed rest tremor and increased postural tremor dominant frequency. This latter, however, did not reach the 8- to 12-Hz frequency band said to be typical of exaggerated physiological tremor. No significant differences between groups were found in their tremor response to levodopa. This study shows that the net postural tremor exhibited by PD patients is improved by levodopa, that levodopa does not augment tremor in the 8- to 12-Hz range, and that this effect is independent of the patient's motor response pattern of oral levodopa.

Aged↗

Levodopa therapy monitoring in patients with Parkinson disease: a kinetic-dynamic approach.

The authors assessed differences in both therapeutic and dyskinesia-matched concentrations of levodopa by kinetic-dynamic modeling in a large cohort of patients with Parkinson disease grouped by severity of symptoms. The goal was to provide a kinetic-dynamic approach to levodopa therapy monitoring to assist treating physicians in rationalizing patients' drug schedules in line with disease progression. Eighty-six patients, grouped according to Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) clinical stage (H&Y I, n = 23; II, n = 25; III; n = 25; IV, n = 13) enrolled in the study. After a 12-hour levodopa washout each patient was examined using a standard oral levodopa test, based on simultaneous serial measurements of plasma levodopa concentrations, finger-tapping motor effects, and dyskinesia ratings. The kinetic-dynamic modeling for both effects was carried out according to the "link" effect compartment model and sigmoidal pharmacodynamic model. Levodopa plasma kinetics did not differ among patient groups. Duration of motor response was significantly (p < 0.001) curtailed in patients in advanced clinical stages whereas dyskinesia duration showed minor changes among the three affected groups (H&Y II, III, and IV). Median effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were increased at the more advanced clinical stage (p < 0.001), from a median 0.2 microg/mL in patients at H&Y stage I to 0.9 microg/mL in patients at H&Y stage IV, whereas the maximum effect showed less consistent changes among the four groups. Intrasubject levodopa therapeutic concentrations were lower than values for dyskinesias in patients at the moderate stage of the disease, equaling dyskinesia-matched drug concentrations in the more affected patients. These findings are in line with previous observations of major changes in levodopa concentration-effects relationship with disease progression and support a stratification of patients with Parkinson disease according to kinetic-dynamic modeling. From a practical point of view, knowledge of individual patients' kinetic-dynamic variables can help the physician assess patients' clinical needs objectively and optimize levodopa dosing according to disease progression.

Adult↗

The influence of levodopa on gastric emptying in man.

1. Simultaneous radioisotopic (99Tc-DTPA) gastric emptying measurements and paracetamol pharmacokinetic studies were performed in eight healthy male volunteers with and without levodopa (125 mg orally). 2. In the absence of levodopa gamma camera imaging showed rapid mono or biexponential emptying in all subjects and the plasma concentration-time curves for paracetamol displayed a single major peak. 3. In the presence of levodopa the time to 90% emptying was prolonged from 32 +/- 24 min to 81 +/- 20 min (P less than 0.01). Gastric emptying was interrupted by a plateau phase in six subjects and this pattern of emptying was associated with double peaks in the plasma concentration-time curves of both levodopa and paracetamol. The time to the end of the plateau phase of emptying correlated with the time to the trough plasma concentrations of paracetamol and levodopa. 4. There was excellent agreement between the plasma concentration-time curves of levodopa and paracetamol, i.e. time to initial peak, r = 0.946, P less than 0.001; time to trough concentration r = 0.943, P less than 0.01; time to second peak r = 0.974, P less than 0.001. 5. The results indicate that levodopa inhibits gastric emptying and thus influences its own absorption. Temporary inhibition of gastric emptying by levodopa (or a metabolite) is the cause of the multiple plasma peaks commonly observed following oral levodopa.

Acetaminophen↗

SELEDO: a 5-year long-term trial on the effect of selegiline in early Parkinsonian patients treated with levodopa.

The SELEDO (from selegiline plus levodopa) study was carried out as a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, double- blind, multicenter long-term, 5-year trial to evaluate the possible advantages of combining selegiline and levodopa in the early treatment of Parkinson's disease. One-hundred-and-sixteen patients were randomized either to selegiline or placebo. Before starting the study medication, the levodopa dose was titrated to the individual requirements of each patient. The primary study end point (time when levodopa had to be increased by >50% of the titrated dose) was reached in 23 of 59 patients in the selegiline group and 26 of 48 patients in the placebo group. At the end of the 5 years' treatment period the rates derived from a life-table analysis were 50.4% in the selegiline group and 74.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.027, log-rank test). The median time to reach the primary end point was 4.9 years in the selegiline group and 2.6 years in the placebo group. In patients treated with selegiline, the mean levodopa dose changed only slightly over the 5 years of treatment compared to the initially titrated dose, but rose markedly in the placebo group, where the dose of levodopa had to be adjusted earlier than in the selegiline group. At the same time, the lower levodopa dosage in the selegiline group was accompanied by at least equal therapeutic efficacy (which is necessary for an unambiguous interpretation). Subgroup analyses showed greater benefit for selegiline treated) patients in the earlier stages. Long-term side effects appeared later in the selegiline group, although the difference was not significant. The early combination of selegiline and levodopa proved to be clearly superior to levodopa monotherapy.

Adult↗

Levodopa effect on [18F]fluorodopa influx to brain: normal volunteers and patients with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Levodopa is the immediate precursor of dopamine and the substrate for DOPA decarboxylase, an enzyme subject to regulation in living brain. To test whether this regulation changes in disease, we used Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with parametric mapping to measure the effect of levodopa on the net clearance of [(18)F]fluorodopa to brain (K, ml/g/min). METHODS: Five patients with early Parkinson's disease with pause of medication for 3 days and six age-matched healthy volunteers were studied in a baseline condition and after levodopa challenge. RESULTS: Levodopa (200 mg as Sinemet) increased the magnitude of the net clearance K in the left and right putamen of the healthy volunteers by 11% relative to the baseline condition. In contrast, resumption of medication with levodopa did not significantly alter the magnitude of K in putamen of the Parkinson's disease patients. Compartmental analysis was used to probe the physiological basis of the activation of K: levodopa treatment increased by 15% the apparent distribution volume of [(18)F]fluorodopa in cerebellum (, ml/g) of both patients and control subjects, without significantly altering the unidirectional blood-brain clearance (, ml/g/min) or the relative activity of DOPA decarboxylase (, min(-1)) in putamen. CONCLUSION: We conclude that levodopa treatment increases the distribution volume of [(18)F]fluorodopa in brain, increasing its availability for utilization in dopamine terminals. We speculate that levodopa act as a direct beta-adrenergic agonist at receptors regulating the permeability of the blood-brain barrier to levodopa. However, the PET analytical method was without sufficient power to detect the consequent increase in magnitude of K in brain of only five Parkinson's disease subjects.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Normal activation of the supplementary motor area in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing long-term treatment with levodopa.

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes in cortical motor areas were measured during a movement of the dominant right hand in 15 patients with Parkinson's disease deprived of their usual levodopa treatment, in 11 patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing long-term treatment with levodopa, and in 15 normal volunteers. The supplementary motor areas were significantly activated in the normal subjects and in the patients receiving levodopa but not in the patients deprived of levodopa. The contralateral primary sensory motor area was significantly activated in all three groups. The ipsilateral primary sensory motor cortex was not activated in the normal subjects and the non-treated patients but was in the patients treated with levodopa. It is concluded that the supplementary motor area hypoactivation which is observed in akinetic non-treated patients with Parkinson's disease is not present in patients undergoing long-term treatment with levodopa. This result suggests that (a) levodopa improves the functional activity of supplementary motor areas in Parkinson's disease and (b) there is no pharmacological tolerance to this effect. The ipsilateral primary motor cortex activation observed in the patients treated with levodopa could be related to levodopa-induced abnormal involuntary movements.

Adult↗

Axial parkinsonian symptoms can be improved: the role of levodopa and bilateral subthalamic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on axial symptoms occurring in advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The efficacy of STN stimulation on total motor disability score (unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) part III) were evaluated in 10 patients with severe Parkinson's disease. The subscores were then studied separately for limb akinesia, rigidity, and tremor, which are known to respond to levodopa, and axial signs, including speech, neck rigidity, rising from a chair, posture, gait, and postural stability, which are known to respond less well to levodopa. Patients were clinically assessed in the "off" and "on" drug condition during a levodopa challenge test performed before surgical implantation of stimulation electrodes and repeated 6 months after surgery under continuous STN stimulation. A complementary score for axial symptoms from the "activities of daily living" (ADL)-that is, speech, swallowing, turning in bed, falling, walking, and freezing-was obtained from each patient's questionnaire (UPDRS, part II). RESULTS: Improvements in total motor disability score (62%), limb signs (62%), and axial signs (72%) obtained with STN stimulation were statistically comparable with those obtained with levodopa during the preoperative challenge (68%, 69%, and 59%, respectively). When levodopa and STN stimulation were combined there was a further improvement in total motor disability (80%) compared with preoperative levodopa administration. This consisted largely of an additional improvement in axial signs (84%) mainly for posture and postural stability, no further improvement in levodopa responsive signs being found. Axial symptoms from the ADL showed similar additional improvement when levodopa and STN stimulation were combined. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that bilateral STN stimulation improves most axial features of Parkinson's disease and that a synergistic effect can be obtained when stimulation is used in conjunction with levodopa treatment.

Adult↗

Effects of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on postural sway in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify postural sway in subjects with Parkinson's disease and elderly controls, and determine the effects of Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation, levodopa, and their interactions on postural control during quiet stance. METHODS: Centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacement under each foot was measured during three 60 s trials of quiet stance with eyes open in 11 controls and six patients with Parkinson's disease. Subjects with Parkinson's disease were tested in four treatment conditions: off both deep brain stimulation and levodopa (off condition); on deep brain stimulation; on levodopa; and on both deep brain stimulation and levodopa. The variables extracted from CoP included: root mean square distance (rms), mean velocity, 95% power frequency (f(95%)), area of the 95% confidence ellipse (ellipse area), direction of its major axis (mdir), and postural asymmetry between the feet. RESULTS: rms and area of postural sway were larger than normal in subjects with Parkinson's disease in the off condition, increased further with levodopa, and significantly decreased with deep brain stimulation. Mean velocity and f(95%) were also larger than normal but were restored to normal by all treatments, especially by deep brain stimulation. The combined effect of deep brain stimulation and levodopa resulted in a postural sway that was an average of the effect of each treatment individually. Levodopa increased sway more in the mediolateral than in the anterior-posterior direction. Subjects with Parkinson's disease had asymmetrical mean velocity and f(95%) between the feet, and this asymmetry increased with levodopa but decreased with deep brain stimulation. The f(95%) of the CoP correlated with tremor, posture, and gait subcomponents of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Parkinson's disease have abnormal postural sway in stance. Treatment with levodopa increases postural sway abnormalities, whereas treatment with deep brain stimulation improves postural sway. Quantitative evaluation of static posturography may be a useful adjunct to clinical measures in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Aged↗

Acute challenge with apomorphine and levodopa in Parkinsonism.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of different parkinsonian syndromes and the ability to predict long-term drug efficacy constitute important clinical issues. DESIGN: Motor responses to the acute administration of levodopa and apomorphine were analyzed in a series of 134 parkinsonian patients, including 83 patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), 28 patients with multiple-system atrophy (MSA), 6 with progressive supranuclear palsy, and 17 with an unclassified parkinsonian syndrome. METHODS: The patients received oral levodopa/carbidopa (250/25 mg) and subcutaneous apomorphine (1.5, 3 and 4.5 mg). Clinical variations of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score were evaluated 1 h following levodopa administration or 20 min following apomorphine. The motor improvement produced by each acute challenge was matched with the clinical diagnosis and with the response to chronic levodopa treatment. The diagnosis was verified by repeated clinical assessments or by autopsy in 2 cases. A receiver operating characteristics curve was plotted comparing PD vs. non-PD, PD vs. MSA and chronic responders vs. nonresponders. Cutoff threshold improvement was defined as the value closest to the crossing point for 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, corresponding to the best trade-off for a predictive evaluation. RESULTS: UPDRS motor score improvement was on average higher in PD than in non-PD patients (levodopa: 29.8 vs. 12.2%; apomorphine 1.5 mg: 27.1 vs. 10.5%; apomorphine 3 mg: 27.7 vs. 9.7%; apomorphine 4.5 mg: 28.8 vs. 11.8%; p < 0.01 with Student's t test). When PD patients were compared to non-PD patients, levodopa challenge had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 16%. Apomorphine had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 13.5% for 1.5 mg, 13% for 3 mg, and 16% for 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 16% in all tests had the highest probability of having PD. When PD patients were compared to MSA patients, levodopa acute challenge had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 17%. Apomorphine had the best diagnostic accuracy with an improvement of 13% for 1.5 mg, 15% for 3 mg, and 18% for 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 18% in all tests had the highest probability of having PD rather than MSA. When patients who responded to chronic levodopa treatment were compared to those who did not, acute challenge with levodopa had the best predictive accuracy with a threshold improvement of 14.5%. Apomorphine had the best predictive accuracy with an improvement of 13% for 1.5 mg, and 14% for 3 and 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 14.5% in all tests had the highest probability of responding to chronic treatment. CONCLUSION: A good agreement was found between acute challenges with levodopa/carbidopa and apomorphine, and the use of both improved the reliability of the test. Different threshold improvements after acute challenges would support a diagnosis of PD or the exclusion of MSA, and would have a predictive value for subsequent response to chronic levodopa therapy.

Age of Onset↗

Primary combination therapy of early Parkinson's disease. A long-term comparison between the combined regimen bromocriptine/levodopa and levodopa monotherapy--first interim report.

The aim of this multicenter randomized prospective study in patients with early Parkinson's disease is to differentiate over a 4-year period between levodopa/benserazide monotherapy and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine by the assessment of motorial side effects, therapeutical benefit and fine motorial skills. Although there is circumstantial evidence, that partial substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine carries benefit in preventing late levodopa-specific side effects and delaying the declining therapeutical benefit, so far no knowledge has been available how levodopa and the corresponding combination with bromocriptine would compare on a long-term basis. Such study appears all the more important since there are experimental findings consistent with a neurotoxic effect of levodopa on the one hand and some 'protective' impact of bromocriptine on the other. As to the practical procedure of the comparison, all patients were first treated with a levodopa monotherapy for 3 months. This was a platform for the consecutive randomized splitting of the patients into two groups receiving either continuing levodopa therapy or combination therapy, based upon at least 40 +/- 10% substitution of levodopa by bromocriptine. The investigation methods included, besides the usual clinical rating scales (Webster, Zung, Hoehn and Yahr), an apparative test series, the so-called 'MLS', which allowed a sensitive and reliable assessment of fine motorial skills. The results of the first 3 months of treatment with levodopa monotherapy before the consecutive splitting into the two treatment regimens demonstrate that the randomization was successful and that there were no significant differences, that potentially might interfere with the drug-specific evaluation afterwards. The results of the substitution phase show that combined treatment permitted a mean reduction of the levodopa dosage by 40%, without deterioration of therapeutic response. In addition, feasibility of the overall approach based upon a sophisticated interplay between the practising neurologists (101) and the centers (27) was demonstrated.

Benserazide↗

Effect of entacapone, a COMT inhibitor, on clinical disability and levodopa metabolism in parkinsonian patients.

We studied the effect of entacapone, a selective catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, on the bioavailability and clinical effect of levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD). On day 1 (control day), nine patients received their own levodopa (plus benserazide) medication only; for the next 7 days they received 200 mg of entacapone with each dose of levodopa (tid or qid). We evaluated disability in the morning (8 AM) before drug administration and then at 1-hour intervals until 6 PM on days 1, 2, and 8, using a modified motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Repeated blood samples were taken before and during the 4 hours after the morning drugs for pharmacokinetic evaluation of entacapone and of levodopa and its metabolites. Added to the levodopa treatment, entacapone decreased clinical disability by about 16% (p < 0.05) from day 1 to day 8. The area under the curve (AUC) of levodopa increased by 38% (p < 0.01) after administration of a single dose of entacapone and by 40% (p < 0.05) after 7 days of multiple dosing with entacapone. Entacapone did not change the Tmax and Cmax values of levodopa. After 7 days of treatment with entacapone, the AUC of 3-O-methyldopa had decreased by 44% (p < 0.01) and of homovanillic acid by 26% (p < 0.05) as compared with treatment with levodopa alone. Four patients became slightly more dyskinetic during entacapone treatment than before it. The combination of entacapone and levodopa was well tolerated, judged by the lack of significant changes in hemodynamic and safety variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

A levodopa kinetic-dynamic study of the rate of progression in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to follow prospectively the intrasubject progression of idiopathic PD in a cohort of patients using levodopa kinetic-dynamic modeling and to assess the relation between the rate of progression of the disease and patients' different clinical characteristics. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 to 3) enrolled in the longitudinal follow-up. Each patient was examined at 1-year intervals over a median 4 years by a standardized oral levodopa test. The primary measure outcome was the computed half-life of levodopa in the "effect compartment" (t1/2eq), a proposed indicator of nigrostriatal dopaminergic functionality and integrity. RESULTS: Values of levodopa t1/2eq correlated negatively with severity of symptoms (r = -0.652, p < 0.0001) and decreased over the years together with a worsening of patients' clinical stage (p < 0.001). The rate of reduction in drug t1/2eq was more rapid in patients at the earlier stages of the disease compared with the more advanced ones, falling from a median annual reduction of 37 minutes in patients at initial Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 to 6.5 minutes in stage 3 patients (p < 0.001). Patients without tremor at onset, otherwise comparable to patients with tremor for baseline values of levodopa t1/2eq, disease severity, duration, and daily dose of levodopa, tended to show a higher rate of reduction in levodopa t1/2eq than patients with tremor. Overall, patients' annual reduction in levodopa t1/2eq over baseline values averaged 17+/-9%. CONCLUSIONS: These results are in keeping with PET findings on the objective assessment of idiopathic parkinsonism evolution, and they support the suggestion that levodopa pharmacodynamic modeling may offer a practical clinical tool to assess indirectly the functional integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system over time in parkinsonian patients.

Adult↗

Entacapone enhances the response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with motor fluctuations. Nomecomt Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect and safety of entacapone as an adjunct to levodopa treatment in patients with PD with wearing-off motor fluctuations. BACKGROUND: Entacapone is a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor that has been shown to increase the area under the concentration-time curve of plasma levodopa by decreasing its systemic elimination, thereby promoting and improving therapeutic response to it. METHODS: A total of 171 parkinsonian patients with wearing-off-type motor fluctuations participated in a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. The extent of therapeutic response was elicited in the first hand with home diary recordings of "on" and "off" times by the patient and with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scoring by the examiner. The patients took either 200 mg entacapone or identical placebos concomitantly with each daily levodopa dose (four to 10 times a day). RESULTS: Patients' home diaries indicated that entacapone increased the mean (+/- SD) "on" time significantly (9.3 +/- 2.2 to 10.7 +/- 2.2 hours; p < 0.01) and correspondingly decreased the "off" time significantly (5.3 +/- 2.2 to 4.2 +/- 2.2 hours; p < 0.001). The average benefit derived from a daily levodopa dose as related by the patients was increased significantly (p < 0.01). The daily levodopa dose was reduced significantly in the entacapone group, the difference between the groups being 102 mg (p < 0.01). The entacapone-derived increase in the benefit from levodopa was lost almost completely following its withdrawal. Entacapone was well tolerated. Dopaminergic adverse events, which increased, were ameliorated by reducing the levodopa dose. Diarrhea was the most common nondopaminergic adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term entacapone treatment effectively prolonged the beneficial response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with the wearing-off phenomenon. The improvement occurred irrespective of the reduction of the levodopa dose.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

[Possibility of interactions between prescription drugs and OTC drugs (2nd report)--interaction between levodopa preparation and OTC Kampo medicines for upset stomach].

Our series of studies aimed to examine the possibility of interactions between prescription drugs and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs by monitoring plasma drug concentrations in rats. When a levodopa preparation indicated for patients with Parkinson's disease was administered in combination with Takeda Kampo Ichoyaku K-matsu (A), Taisho Kampo Ichoyaku (B), or Kanebo Kampo Ichoyaku H(C), which are OTC kampo medicines for upset stomach, the plasma levodopa concentration-time curves were shifted downward and the AUC for levodopa was significantly lowered. These results indicate that there may be some interactions between the levodopa preparation and these OTC kampo medicines when ingested together, which leads to a reduction in the bioavailability of levodopa. On the other hand, concomitant administration of the levodopa preparation with Takeda Kampo Ichoyaku A-matsu (D) did not alter any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for levodopa. According to the package inserts for the OTC kampo medicines, A, B and C, but not D, contain metallic additives, such as aluminum silicate and magnesium stearate. In addition, combination with a kampo basis of D (Koshaheiisan-ka-shakuyaku) showed no detectable change in levodopa bioavailability. From these results, it was concluded that metallic additives may play an essential role in generating the drug-interaction between levodopa preparation and OTC kampo medicine for upset stomach.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic↗