Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ifosfamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Ifosfamide and mesna: response and toxicity at standard- and high-dose schedules.

In two sequential trials, 154 patients were treated with dosages of ifosfamide, ranging between 8 and 18 g/m2 divided over 4 days, with mesna uroprotection. The first was a phase II efficacy trial in 125 advanced sarcoma patients (Antman et al: J Clin Oncol 7:126-131, 1989), while the second was a dose escalation trial involving 29 patients (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990). In the first trial, patients received 8 to 10 g/m2 ifosfamide either by bolus or continuous infusion. The response rate for the 64 patients receiving bolus administration was 23% compared with 12% for the 60 patients receiving a continuous infusion schedule (P = .09). Of the 154 patients, 144 had sarcoma and had failed at least one previous regimen. Of these 144, 4% responded completely and 23% had a complete or partial response. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide was 16 g/m2 in the second trial. Dose-limiting renal toxicity was observed at 18 g/m2 ifosfamide (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990). The duration of myelosuppression and the frequency and severity of mucositis and renal tubular acidosis were dose-dependent. A median of 11 days (range, 8 to 18) of granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) were observed. Thus, autologous bone marrow reinfusion was not required. Severe central nervous system toxicity (transient confusion, hallucinations, and somnolence) was observed sporadically at both low- and high-dose levels. The first four patients on the standard-dose study did not receive mesna because it was unavailable; three developed gross hematuria. In patients who received mesna, hematuria was uncommon. Hematuria in the group as a whole was significantly associated with a lack of uroprotection, but was not associated with prior cyclophosphamide, pelvic radiotherapy, age, or bolus versus a continuous infusion schedule. Patients receiving ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection can tolerate considerable dose escalation over the usual prescribed doses before nonhematologic toxicity becomes dose-limiting. Ifosfamide, with its broad activity in solid tumors, may prove to be an important addition to high-dose combination-chemotherapy regimens (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990).

Adolescent↗

Ifosfamide in the management of gynecologic cancers.

Ifosfamide, an alkylating agent chemically similar to cyclophosphamide, has been tested both as a single agent and in combination therapy for a variety of gynecologic cancers. In celomic epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, single agent ifosfamide yields response rates ranging from 19% to 79% and, most significantly, responses in patients who are refractory to cisplatin. Use in combination with both cisplatin and carboplatin has been reported, but the relative merits of these two combinations are indeterminate at present. In carcinoma of the cervix, response rates for ifosfamide alone range from 20% to 40% in patients who have not received prior chemotherapy. Very high response rates from 67% to 86% have been reported with ifosfamide in combination with platinum compounds with or without other agents such as doxorubicin and bleomycin. No studies have yet demonstrated superiority of combination therapy. Data from the Gynecologic Oncology Group demonstrate activity for ifosfamide alone in mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus. Finally, anecdotal data note responses in endometrial carcinoma and germ cell carcinomas of the ovary. Thus, it appears that ifosfamide has significant activity in a variety of gynecologic cancers and deserves further testing as a part of combination chemotherapy in at least celomic epithelial carcinomas of the ovary, cervix carcinomas, and mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer.

Ifosfamide, an analogue of cyclophosphamide, has been proven to be of value in numerous malignancies, including testicular cancer, sarcoma, and lymphoma. Furthermore, ifosfamide is more suitable for combination chemotherapy than its parent compound because it causes less myelosuppression than cyclophosphamide. There have been only a few studies evaluating single-agent ifosfamide in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In patients who have had little or no prior chemotherapy, ifosfamide appears as active as any single agent. Combination chemotherapy regimens employing cisplatin (or carboplatin) plus etoposide plus ifosfamide are currently under way on both sides of the Atlantic. A Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG) study will evaluate this three-drug regimen v cisplatin plus etoposide, and this protocol will establish or refute the value of ifosfamide as first-line therapy in extensive SCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Ifosfamide--pharmacologic overview.

Ifosfamide and its structural analogue cyclophosphamide are oxazaphosphorine nitrogen mustards, a group of compounds synthesized in West Germany more than 20 years ago. Whereas both chloroethyl groups of cyclophosphamide are attached to the same exocyclic nitrogen, one of ifosfamide's chloroethyl groups is attached to an endocyclic nitrogen. This minor structural change may account for the different pharmacologic behavior of these two compounds as well as their different spectrums of clinical activity and toxicity. Initial clinical trials of ifosfamide explored the use of a single intravenous dose. Hemorrhagic cystitis appeared to be dose-dependent and limited the use of this agent. However, the development of a systemic thiol uroprotector, such as mesna, has overcome this toxicity, permitting higher ifosfamide doses to be administered. Currently, ifosfamide is usually administered daily for five days in combination with mesna. The pharmacology and metabolism of ifosfamide may explain the toxicities associated with this compound and should be considered when designing schedules of administration.

Animals↗

Ifosfamide in pediatric malignancies.

In pediatric malignancies, particularly sarcomas, alkylating agents play an important role in the curative, combination chemotherapy approach. Since high doses of ifosfamide, the structural isomer of cyclophosphamide, were made tolerable with mesna uroprotection, high-dose ifosfamide (5 to 10 g/m2) has replaced conventional-dose cyclophosphamide (900 to 1,500 mg/m2) in some combination chemotherapy regimens. In Ewing's sarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma, the response rate and proportion of patients surviving disease free have been increased (at least for poor-prognosis patients) by 15% to 20% with an ifosfamide-containing regimen, as used in ongoing trials of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology. In germ cell tumors, the combination of ifosfamide and etoposide has proved to be an effective salvage regimen in patients resistant to vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin. In stage IV disseminated neuroblastoma, however, the introduction of ifosfamide-containing regimens has not altered the poor prognosis. Results reflecting the value of ifosfamide in osteosarcoma, Wilms' tumor and Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas are pending. It is not yet known whether high doses of akylating agents will increase the risk of late sequelae in cured patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity: associated symptoms and nursing implications.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review current understanding of the neurotoxicity associated with ifosfamide administration. DATA SOURCES: Published studies of ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity, published literature on other causes of neurotoxicity associated with cancer, and a case study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity has not been well-described in the nursing literature. To correctly identify ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity, nurses need to assess the patient's history and neurologic, affective, and cognitive status and implement appropriate nursing interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Research aimed at accurate identification of ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity and the most effective nursing interventions is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Judicious nursing assessment will facilitate differentiation of ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity from other neurotoxicities associated with cancer and its treatment.

Brain Diseases↗

Ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia in patients with refractory sarcoma and malignant teratoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, biological interactions, and toxicities of ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 1 h in a pilot clinical study. Nineteen patients with refractory sarcoma or malignant teratoma were treated. To obtain baseline pharmacokinetic data for ifosfamide, the first chemotherapy course was given without WBH in six patients. This enabled comparison of systemic toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the drug combination with and without WBH (+/- WBH). All other patients received three thermochemotherapy treatments every 3 weeks. Ifosfamide was escalated from 5 to 10 g/m2 with a fixed carboplatin dose of 480 mg/m2. WBH was induced by extracorporally heated blood (in a hemodialysis apparatus) with general anesthesia. The drugs were given at target temperature. A total of 49 thermochemotherapy treatments was administered. The use of the hemodialysis device resulted in an approximate one-third reduction of blood concentrations of 4-hydroxyifosfamide, one activated intermediate metabolite of ifosfamide and carboplatin, but in an increase of chloroacetaldehyde, the other main ifosfamide metabolite. The WBC counts and the platelet nadirs (up to WBH grade 4) were not significantly different +/- WBH. Of 19 evaluable patients, 7 partial remissions, 8 disease stabilizations (average duration, 3 months), and 4 patients with progressive disease were observed. There was no WBH-related mortality. Toxicities observed included mild (anasarca, diarrhea, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex) and severe (reversible neuropathy, cardiopulmonary distress, and severe renal dysfunction). No hepatic or central nervous system toxicity occurred. Nephropathy was the dose-limiting toxicity. In conclusion, ifosfamide and carboplatin can be administered with extracorporally induced WBH with acceptable toxicity. Results obtained are consistent with continued evaluation of this combined modality approach.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ifosfamide administered as a continuous infusion in children.

The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of ifosfamide was investigated in a group of 16 pediatric patients (5 girls) aged 1-17 years. Each received a dose of 3 g/m2/day for up to 3 days by continuous infusion. Plasma and urine were collected, and concentrations of ifosfamide and its principal metabolites were determined by a quantitative high-performance thin layer chromatography method. During 3 days of continuous infusion, the plasma concentrations of parent drug decreased. This was accompanied by a continuous increase in dechloroethylated products in plasma but not in urine. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life) were dependent on body size and age but not any other patient variable. Renal clearance was a relatively minor route of elimination for parent drug and corresponded to < 25% of glomerular filtration rate. Metabolite data from plasma and urine indicated a high degree of interindividual variation in metabolism. Comparison of metabolite recoveries in urine indicated a positive correlation between activation and inactivation routes of metabolism. Prior exposure to ifosfamide was associated with a higher recovery in urine of dechloroethylated metabolites. The severity of hematological toxicity was inversely correlated with glomerular filtration rate but not to parameters of ifosfamide metabolism. There was marked variation in levels of the carboxy metabolite, which could not be detected in the plasma of 5 subjects. However, evidence for a polymorphism in metabolism to this metabolite was weaker than that seen with the isomeric oxazaphosphorine cyclophosphamide. There appeared to be a higher clearance of ifosfamide in pediatric patients compared to adults. The significance of this, and of the variation in metabolism of ifosfamide, for clinical outcome remains to be established, but the increase in the dechloroethylation route of metabolism may be associated with an increased risk of toxicity.

Adolescent↗

Ifosfamide in the treatment of breast cancer.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating agent that has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of several malignancies. Preclinical data also support non-cross-reactivity between cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide in several cell lines. These data suggest that ifosfamide may be highly effective in the salvage setting for breast cancer patients who have received previous treatment with cyclophosphamide. Unfortunately, the available data on ifosfamide use in advanced disease are derived from poorly designed studies that evaluated various patient populations and dosing schedules. This review examines the efficacy of ifosfamide in salvage therapy for breast cancer and emphasizes the need to determine the optimal dosing schedule for ifosfamide used as a single agent or in combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

Ifosfamide in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Although chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer has historically been based on cisplatin-based combination regimens, the limitations of these regimens both in terms of efficacy and toxicity are now widely appreciated. In response to these limitations, other single agents have been studied, and a number have demonstrated significant activity, including ifosfamide. Older single-agent phase II trials of ifosfamide in previously untreated patients suggested a response rate as high as 40%, including objective responses in nontransitional histologies. More recently, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group has defined the response rate for ifosfamide in patients with one prior chemotherapy regimen to be 20%, with central nervous system toxicity, nephrotoxicity, and myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicities. Phase II trials of ifosfamide in combination with vinblastine and gallium nitrate have been completed, while others, including trials with paclitaxel alone or paclitaxel plus cisplatin, are ongoing. The precise role of ifosfamide in the therapy of advanced bladder cancer is in the process of being defined. However, the frequency of occult or clinically evident renal insufficiency in this patient population may limit ifosfamide's role in this disease.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Ifosfamide in the treatment of germ cell tumors.

Ifosfamide is currently the third most active agent in the treatment of germ cell cancer, behind cisplatin and etoposide. Ifosfamide has single-agent activity comparable to etoposide in very poor-prognosis, cisplatin-refractory disease. In the salvage setting, ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy can be expected to achieve disease-free status in approximately 50% of cisplatin-sensitive testicular cancer patients, although half of these patients will eventually relapse. As first-line therapy in previously untreated poor-risk patients, ifosfamide-based chemotherapy is therapeutically equivalent to standard therapy but associated with increased toxicity, especially myelosuppression. The role of high-dose ifosfamide in dose-intensive carboplatin/etoposide regimens for the treatment of recurrent disease is unknown and awaits clarification in future research. Current research with this drug continues primarily in the realm of refining ifosfamide-based salvage therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for previously treated lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide-based chemotherapy has already been the basis of three separate clinical trials. In this study, ifosfamide was administered to lung cancer patients who had failed to respond to previous chemotherapy, to assess its response rate and toxicity. METHODS: From January 1993 to December 1996, 21 patients were treated, including eight patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 13 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients who had histocytologically confirmed lung cancer, were previously treated with chemotherapy, had a measurable lesion(s), were younger than 75 years of age, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3 and adequate marrow, renal and liver function were eligible for inclusion in this study. For SCLC patients, ifosfamide 2.4 g/m2 intravenous (i.v.) infusion was given over 30 minutes on days 1-3 every four weeks. For NSCLC two regimens were used: IFL (ifosfamide 2 g/m2, 5-fluorouracil (FU) 600 mg/m2 and leucovorin 50 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on days 1-3 every four weeks) and LIFE (leucovorin 50 mg/m2, ifosfamide 1 g/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 and epirubicin 12 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on days 1-3 every four weeks). For NSCLC patients, IFL was used for the first two years of treatment and LIFE was used in the last two treatment years. All patients were evaluated for treatment response and toxicity. RESULTS: The major toxic effect, myelosuppression (grade 3 or 4 leukopenia), occurred in 62.5% of SCLC patients and 23.1% of NSCLC patients during treatment, and in 62.5% and 10% of SCLC and NSCLC patients, respectively, throughout the course. Only one SCLC and one NSCLC patient experienced febrile neutropenia. One toxic death, attributed to febrile neutropenia, was documented in a patient with SCLC. Alopecia was ubiquitous. Other toxicities were uncommon and mild. The overall response rate was 50% in SCLC and 7.7% in NSCLC. The median time to disease progression was 61 days in SCLC and 47 days in NSCLC. Median survival was 172 days in SCLC and 173 days in NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that ifosfamide chemotherapy is active with an acceptable toxicity profile in previously treated SCLC patients. However, it lacks efficacy in NSCLC patients who have been previously treated.

Adult↗

A Phase I trial of ifosfamide and paclitaxel with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the treatment of patients with refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide and paclitaxel are antineoplastic agents with broad activity and with different mechanisms of action. A Phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and associated toxicities of these agents when used in combination. METHODS: Patients with refractory, incurable solid tumors were entered on a 5-step Phase I trial of ifosfamide, given in doses of 2-3 g/m2 intravenous (i.v.) bolus for 3 days with mesna support, and paclitaxel, given in doses of 135-190 g/m2 i.v. by continuous infusion over 24 hours. Paclitaxel was given after the first dose of ifosfamide on Day 1. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated, and the maximum tolerated dose was the highest planned dose level of the trial: ifosfamide, 3 g/m2/day i.v. for 3 days, and paclitaxel, 190 mg/m2 i.v. over 24 hours. Hematologic toxicity was not dose-limiting, and although neutropenia occurred, it was brief (median, 2-4 days) and resulted in hospitalization for neutropenia and fever in only 7 of 111 courses of therapy. For patients treated at the highest dose level, only 1 of 50 courses of therapy resulted in hospitalization for neutropenia and fever. Nonhematologic toxicity also was not severe and no significant neuropathy occurred. Although patients entered into the study were heavily pretreated, responses were observed, particularly in patients with breast or ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Ifosfamide and paclitaxel can be administered safely in the doses used in this study and there are indications of significant antitumor effect. Further studies are necessary to explore the antineoplastic activity of this regimen, particularly for patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma.

Adult↗

A phase II study of the combination of carboplatin and ifosfamide in previously untreated metastatic small cell lung carcinoma.

This Phase II study evaluated the combination of two active agents in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): carboplatin and ifosfamide. Thirty previously untreated patients (27 men and 3 women) with a median age of 59 years were included in this study. Twelve patients had one metastatic site and 18 had two or more metastatic sites. The median performance status was 80%. The chemotherapy (CT) regimen administered during the course of this study consisted of carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (4 g/m2) plus mesna every 4 weeks. All 30 patients were evaluable: 1 achieved a complete remission (CR) and 18 achieved a partial remission (PR) (objective response rate, 63%). The median response time was 3 months and the median survival time was 8 months (range, 1 to 25+ months). Bone marrow toxicity was Grade III in three patients and Grade IV in four patients. The carboplatin and ifosfamide combination was well tolerated. No cross-resistance with the doxorubicin and etoposide regimen was established because 4 of 11 patients responded to this combination (+/- cisplatin) after failing to respond to the ifosfamide and carboplatin regimen. The ifosfamide and carboplatin combination may be considered for inclusion in non-cross-resistant alternating CT schedules.

Adult↗

Pilot study of ambulatory infusional ifosfamide admixed with carboplatin.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide and carboplatin are agents that have completed Phase I studies using a continuous infusion schedule for as long as 14 days. The in vitro compatibility of the two drugs allows for the simultaneous administration in an admixture, and a pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility and tolerability of the infusion schedule for the combination. METHODS: Ifosfamide at 500 mg/M2/day and carboplatin at 15 or 20 mg/M2/day were administered for 14-day cycles repeated at 28 days in 29 patients, with a total of 60 courses administered. RESULTS: Total cumulative dose per cycle was: ifosfamide 7.0 g/M2 and carboplatin 210-280 mg/M2. Hematuria developed in five patients, four of whom had prior urologic disease, severe thrombocytopenia, or pelvic radiation. In all patients, the hematuria was transient and inconsequential despite the absence of mesna. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia was observed in eight patients with or without thrombocytopenia and delayed subsequent treatment cycles. Thrombocytopenia was less frequent (Grade 3, 2 patients: Grade 4, 1 patient). No significant episodes of sepsis or hemorrhage were noted. Anemia requiring transfusion developed in 12 of 29 patients. Twenty-one of the 29 patients had received prior chemotherapy. Five of seven previously untreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer achieved a complete (1) or partial (4) response. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous 14-day infusion of ifosfamide admixed with carboplatin is feasible in an ambulatory setting with no need for adding mesna for urologic protection and full dosage administration for each agent. Phase 2 studies in non-small cell lung cancer would be reasonable at the optimal doses of ifosfamide 500 mg/M2/day and carboplatin 15 mg/M2/day, and the potential exists for the introduction of additional agents, such as etoposide.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Primary extracranial rhabdoid tumors. Clinicopathologic features and response to ifosfamide.

BACKGROUND: Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is an aggressive, invariably lethal tumor that is resistant to multimodal therapy. METHODS: The authors reviewed the clinicopathologic features, treatment, and outcome of 13 children (7 boys and 6 girls) with diagnoses of primary extracranial MRT at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between 1981 and 1990. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 8 months (range, 10 weeks-18 years). Primary sites included the kidney (seven patients), liver (three patients), soft tissue of scapula, posterior mediastinum, and retroperitoneum. Seven patients had metastatic disease (lungs, six patients; cutaneous hemangioma, one patient). Ten patients had surgical resection of primary tumor (complete, nine patients; incomplete, one patient). Eleven patients had chemotherapy with multiple agents. Three of four chemotherapy responses observed were with regimens containing ifosfamide. Partial responses (PR, > 50% reduction in tumor size) were obtained in one patient who received single-agent ifosfamide during disease relapse (PR lasting 2 months), one patient who received a combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide at diagnosis (PR lasting 5 months), and one patient who was treated with bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine at diagnosis (PR lasting 5 months) and subsequently with ifosfamide in combination with carboplatin and etoposide during disease relapse (PR lasting 4 months). All patients died at a median period of 5 months (range, 0.5-30 months) after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, the authors recommend using ifosfamide alone or in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in front-line therapy for malignant rhabdoid tumor.

Adolescent↗

A phase I study of ifosfamide given on alternate days to treat children with brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide with Mesna, given every other day over a 5-day period, was evaluated in 20 children with recurrent or progressive primary brain tumors. METHODS: The patients were assigned to dosage cohorts separated on the basis of prior exposure to cisplatin (n = 10) or the absence of such exposure (n = 10). The initial dose in each treatment arm was 2133 mg/m2 every other day for three doses, which represented 80% of the total dose delivered in our prior study of ifosfamide given daily over 5 days. The dose was escalated by 20% in each of the two subsequent cohorts (2560 mg/m2 and 3072 mg/m2 every other day for three doses). RESULTS: The hematologic toxicity was dose limiting. Prior exposure to cisplatin did not seem to increase the hematologic toxicity. The most frequent and significant metabolic disturbance was hyponatremia, resulting in self-limited seizure activity in three patients. This complication was prevented in subsequent patients by changing the post-ifosfamide hydration fluids from 5% dextrose in quarter normal saline to 5% dextrose in normal saline. CONCLUSIONS: Although no child achieved a complete response, the activity of ifosfamide was demonstrated for a variety of tumors. The recommended dose of ifosfamide in a Phase II study for brain tumors is 3000 mg/m2 given with Mesna every other day for three doses.

Adolescent↗

Hallucinations and ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Hallucinations as a symptom of central neurotoxicity are a known but poorly described side effect of ifosfamide. Most cases of ifosfamide-induced hallucinations have been reported with other mental status changes. METHODS: The authors interviewed six persons with ifosfamide-induced hallucinations in the presence of a clear sensorium. All patients were receiving high-dose ifosfamide as part of their bone marrow transplant procedure. RESULTS: Hallucinations occurred only when the patient's eyes were closed and, in all but one case, were reported as disturbing or frightening. Underreporting of these hallucinations by patients is likely. CONCLUSIONS: Hallucinations may be the sole or first manifestation of neurotoxicity. The incidence may be dose and infusion-time related. The clinician should be alerted for possible ifosfamide-induced hallucinations, which may occur without other signs of neurotoxicity. "Eyes-closed" hallucinatory experiences appear to be an unusual feature of this presentation. Patients anxious about this experience respond well to support and education about this occurrence. Optimal pharmacologic management of disturbed patients is unclear. If agitation becomes marked, high-potency neuroleptics (i.e., haloperidol) may be effective.

Adult↗