Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HALOPERIDOL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Withdrawal from chronic haloperidol substitutes for the pentylenetetrazol discriminative stimulus.

The present study was designed to examine withdrawal from a therapeutic, non abused drug, haloperidol. Rats were trained to discriminate the anxiogenic compound pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) from water in a two lever, food reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. Dose effect curves were then determined for PTZ and the antipsychotic drug, haloperidol (0.1-1 mg/kg). Haloperidol did not substitute for PTZ, even at a dose that decreased rates of responding to approximately 15% of control values. Rats were then treated chronically with either 1 or 2 mg/kg/day haloperidol while training was suspended. After 5 days of chronic haloperidol 4/6 animals in the 1 mg/kg/day group and 5/7 in the 2 mg/kg/day group chose the PTZ lever when tested 24-48 hours after the last haloperidol injection. Haloperidol, 1 or 2 mg/kg, did not reverse PTZ-lever responding. After an additional 5 days of chronic haloperidol, 3/6 rats in the 1 mg/kg/day group and 5/7 rats in the 2 mg/kg/day group responded on the PTZ lever 24 hours after the last injection, and this was reversed with the anxiolytic, chlordiazepoxide (3.2-5.6 mg/kg). The current findings indicate that there is an anxiogenic component to withdrawal from haloperidol. In psychotic patients, abrupt discontinuation of haloperidol results in nausea, vomiting and sweating, as well as a "relapse into psychosis" characterized by anxiety, depression and internal chaos (1). Interestingly, the authors caution that the so-called relapse into psychosis may simply be a sign of withdrawal. The current findings support their view and suggest that abrupt discontinuation of psychoactive therapeutic agents may result in anxiety.

Animals↗

BehavioraL and biochemical changes caused by muscimol in mice withdrawN from haloperidol administration.

This study was designed to determine the behavioral and biochemical effects of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, muscimol, in mice withdrawn from chronic haloperidol administration. Mice received either haloperidol or vehicle In their drinking water for 35 days, after which the haloperidol was replaced with vehicle. Seven days after withdrawal from chronic treatment with haloperidol, the effect of apomorphine on the climbing behavior of haloperidol-withdrawn mice was markedly enhanced as compared to control mice that received only vehicle. Muscimol produced a dose-related reduction in the intensity of climbing behavior induced by apomorphine in both control and haloperidol-withdrawn mice. However, the inhibition of climbing behavior induced by muscimol was significantly greater in haloperidol-withdrawn animals. In addition, in haloperidol-withdrawn mice, muscimol produced a significant reduction in striatal homovanillic (HVA) levels with no change in striatal dopamine (DA) levels, suggesting a decrease in DA turnover. In support of this conclusion, muscimol decreased the disappearance of dopamine in haloperidol-withdrawn mice that were injected with alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine. Both the behavioral and biochemical effects of muscimol were blocked by the GABA antagonist, picrotoxin. These results indicate that after chronic haloperidol administration there is not only an enhanced response to dopaminergic agonists but also to GABAergic agonists.

Animals↗

Nicotine potentiation of haloperidol-induced catalepsy: striatal mechanisms.

Nicotine potentiated the catalepsy produced by haloperidol. The excitotoxin quinolinic acid (QA) selectively destroys striatal neurons when injected directly into the striatum. Bilateral QA lesions of the rat striatum (150 nmol) significantly reduced the catalepsy produced by haloperidol as well as the ability of nicotine to potentiate haloperidol-induced catalepsy. A second experiment examined whether the ability of nicotine to potentiate haloperidol-induced catalepsy was associated with a potentiation of dopamine turnover following haloperidol. Nicotine alone produced a mild increase in dopamine turnover relative to saline treated controls while haloperidol produced a marked increase in dopamine turnover relative to saline- and nicotine-treated controls. However, the combined administration of haloperidol and nicotine did not further elevate dopamine turnover over that observed following haloperidol alone. The results indicated that: 1) nicotine could not potentiate haloperidol-induced catalepsy without an intact striatum and 2) the behavioral effect of nicotine and haloperidol cotreatment was not due to any change in dopamine turnover.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

A comparison of haloperidol, lithium carbonate and their combination in the treatment of mania.

Previous investigations of the treatment of mania have resulted in uncertainty about the efficacy of lithium versus a neuroleptic. In addition there have been reports of toxicity with a haloperidol--lithium combination. In order to determine the comparative efficacy of lithium vs haloperidol vs a combination of haloperidol--lithium, we studied 21 severely ill manic patients who all met rigorous criteria for bipolar illness and who required in hospital treatment. Subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups: (A) Lithium plus placebo (B) Placebo plus haloperidol and (C) Lithium plus haloperidol. The study was conducted in double blind fashion for 3 weeks with the dosages of the medications varied according to clinical response or untoward effects. Subjects on haloperidol and placebo or the haloperidol--lithium combination were significantly improved after 7 days in comparison to the lithium-treated group. Groups B and C did not differ from each other, either in degree of improvement or in side effects. Inspite of the relatively small sample size the results suggest (1) that haloperidol is superior to lithium for treating severely ill acute mania and (2) that while a haloperidol--lithium combination does not result in a significant increase in side effects, it is not superior to haloperidol alone.

Adult↗

Effect of repeated haloperidol administration on phencyclidine discrimination in rats.

1. Previous research has shown that acute doses of haloperidol block many of themotor stimulatory effects of phencyclidine (PCP) and other PCP-like drugs. In addition, when given acutely, haloperidol produces partial attenuation of PCP's discriminative stimulus effects in rats. 2. Haloperidol is often administered chronically in clinical situations; hence, it is important to investigate the effects of repeated, as well as acute, dosing with this drug. 3. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of repeated administration of haloperidol on PCP discrimination in rats. Rats were trained to discriminate PCP (2.0 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure and were tested with cumulative doses of PCP before and after repeated administration of saline and of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg/day). 4. Discrimination training was suspended during the two 14-15-day repeated dosing regimens. Suspended training with repeated saline administration had little effect on the dose-effect curve for % PCP-lever responding. 5. Repeated administration of haloperidol produced some diminution of PCP discrimination. After haloperidol, the ED50 for % PCP-lever responding was 1.4 mg/kg, compared to the pre-haloperidol ED50 of 0.7 mg/kg. 6. These results are consistent with those of acute dosing studies with haloperidol in PCP-trained rats and suggest that repeated administration of haloperidol may disrupt PCP's discriminative stimulus effects, although most rats were still able to discriminate the higher doses of PCP.

Animals↗

Electrophysiological, biochemical, and behavioral studies of acute haloperidol-induced depolarization block of nigral dopamine neurons.

The electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral responses produced by administration of haloperidol were studied in intact rats and in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced partial lesions of the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway. In both control rats and rates tested four to 10 days postlesion, the electrophysiological response of nigral dopamine neurons to increasing doses of haloperidol consisted of either: (1) an increase in firing rate which reached a plateau at six to 10 spikes per second, or (2) no response (i.e., less than 20% change in firing rate). Administration of additional doses of haloperidol up to lethal levels did not elicit further changes in dopamine cell firing in these rats. In contrast, in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats tested four to six weeks postlesion, acute administration of haloperidol was not only more consistent in producing increases in dopamine cell firing rate, but also caused six out of seven dopamine neurons tested to cease firing upon entering a state of depolarization block. In all cases in which depolarization block was observed, dopamine cell firing was reinstated by either iontophoretic application of gamma-aminobutyric acid or intravenous administration of apomorphine. In parallel studies, haloperidol caused an increase in the extracellular dopamine levels measured by microdialysis in the striatum of control rats, whereas administration of the same dose of haloperidol to 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats four to six weeks postlesion did not elicit any change in extracellular dopamine levels. In addition, administration of haloperidol at a dose which was ineffective in control rats produced gross motor deficits in the 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats when tested four to six weeks postlesion. These results show that 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine depletions produce a time-dependent change in the responsivity of the nigrostriatal dopamine system to acute haloperidol administration. In this altered system, the induction of depolarization block of spike activity in nigral dopamine neurons by haloperidol was not associated with a corresponding decrease in extracellular dopamine levels measured in the striatum. However, it appeared that depolarization block did prevent haloperidol-induced increases in extracellular dopamine levels. The occurrence of depolarization block in the dopamine-depleted animal may limit the capacity of this system to respond to additional compromise, in spite of the compensatory processes that contribute to maintaining motor function.

Animals↗

High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the detection and quantitation of haloperidol and seven of its metabolites in microsomal preparations.

An isocratic high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) system was developed to analyze haloperidol and its potential metabolites. These compounds included 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidine (CPHP), haloperidol N-oxide (HNO), reduced haloperidol (RHAL), the 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine analogue and its N-oxide, and the pyridinium ion from haloperidol (HP+). The HPLC system comprised a Hypersil CPS5 column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile (67%) and ammonium acetate (final concentration 10 mM) which was adjusted to pH 5.4 by acetic acid. The solvent was delivered at 1 ml/min. RHAL and CPHP were determined by an ultraviolet detector at 220 nm with a detection limit of 1 nmol/ml. All other compounds were determined at 245 nm and had a detection limit of 0.3 nmol/ml. This system was used to analyze a microsomal metabolic mixture of haloperidol. It was found that all above compounds except HNO were metabolites of haloperidol. In addition, two other metabolites were also well separated in this HPLC system which are proposed to be oxygenated haloperidol and the pyridone analogue of haloperidol. The HPLC system was used to carry out quantitative metabolic studies of haloperidol. It was found that the metabolism of haloperidol exhibits large inter-species differences. The apparent enzyme kinetic parameters were also determined using mice microsomes.

Animals↗

Role of nigral NFkappaB p50 and p65 subunit expression in haloperidol-induced neurotoxicity and stereotyped behavior in rats.

Long-term use of typical neuroleptics such as haloperidol may be limited by unwanted motor side effects like tardive dyskinesia (TD) characterized by repetitive involuntary movements, involving the mouth, face and tongue. TD generally persists after haloperidol withdrawal indicating long lasting changes in brain function that are no longer related to the presence of the drug. The precise mechanisms of the neuronal toxicity induced by haloperidol are poorly understood. Haloperidol has been shown to induce the expression of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB (NFkappaB). NFkappaB resembles a heterodimer protein composed of a 50 and a 65 kDa subunits and the role of the NFkappaB subunits on haloperidol-induced toxicity remains still unknown. The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of the p65 and p50 subunits of NFkappaB on the toxicity induced by chronic haloperidol administration in an experimental model of TD. Rats were treated for 21 days with: haloperidol (1mg/kg), clozapine (1mg/kg) or saline. Apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior was evaluated. Striatal expression of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the nigral expression of the NFkappaB p65 and p50 subunits were measured by Western Blot. Haloperidol, but not clozapine, increased stereotyped behavior associated to a decreased striatal DAT expression (p<0.01). Haloperidol did not modify the nigral expression of the p65 subunit whereas clozapine decreased it (p<0.01). Both drugs induced a significant decrease in the nigral expression of the NFkappaB p50 (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The decrease in nigral expression of the p50 subunit may increase the vulnerability of the dopaminergic neurons to a possible neurotoxic effect of p65 subunits in the haloperidol-treated rats.

Animals↗

Differential nigral expression of Bcl-2 protein family in chronically haloperidol and clozapine-treated rats: role in neurotoxicity and stereotyped behavior.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a syndrome characterized by repetitive involuntary movements induced by the administration of typical neuroleptics such as haloperidol. TD generally persists after haloperidol withdrawal indicating that haloperidol produces long-lasting changes in brain function. In contrast to the typicals, atypical medications, such as clozapine, have very low rates of TD. The mechanisms underlying drug-induced TD are poorly understood. We have investigated the role of nigral expression of the bcl-2 family of proteins on haloperidol-induced neurotoxicity. Rats were treated for 21 days with the following drugs: haloperidol (1 mg/kg), clozapine (1 mg/kg) or saline. After a 3-day washout period, apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior was scored. Western blotting was performed to evaluate the nigral expression of the dopamine transporter (DAT), bax, bcl-x(L) and bcl-2 proteins. Haloperidol administration, but not clozapine, increased stereotyped behavior (p<0.01) in association with a decrease in striatal DAT expression (p<0.05). Haloperidol and clozapine treatment significantly decreased the nigral expression of bax (p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively). Neither treatment modified bcx(L) expression. Haloperidol increased (p<0.05), whereas clozapine did not significantly modify the nigral expression of bcl-2. Our results suggest that the increase in bcl-2 expression in the haloperidol-treated animals might be a compensatory mechanism that may reflect cellular damage induced by haloperidol in the dopaminergic neurons in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra.

Animals↗

Effects of L-dopa and bromocriptine on haloperidol-induced motor deficits in mice.

L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), the precursor of dopamine, and bromocriptine, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, were investigated in haloperidol-induced motor impairments in mice using both catalepsy and pole tests. In catalepsy test, subcutaneous treatment with haloperidol (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) caused a cataleptic effect in mice in a dose-dependent manner. This cataleptic effect was evident upto 7 hr after haloperidol treatment. In pole test, haloperidol (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) produced the prolongation of Tturn and TLA as a marker of bradykinesia in mice and the prolongation lasted at least 7 hr after haloperidol treatment. Intraperitoneal co-pretreatment with L-DOPA (400 mg/kg) + carbidopa (10 mg/kg) in mice decreased the catalepsy induced by haloperidol at a dose of 0.125 mg/kg, while co-pretreatment with L-DOPA (200 and 400 mg/kg) + carbidopa (10 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased the haloperidol (0.125 mg/kg)-induced bradykinesia. The effect of LDOPA + carbidopa in pole test was more pronounced than that in catalepsy test. Intraperitoneal pretreatment with bromocriptine (2 and 4 mg/kg) in mice reduced the catalepsy and bradykinesia produced by haloperidol at a dose of 0.125 mg/kg. The effect of bromocriptine in pole test was relatively similar to that in catalepsy test. Also, co-pretreatment with LDOPA (400 mg/kg) + carbidopa (10 mg/kg) and pretreatment with bromocriptine (2 and 4 mg/kg) significantly decreased the catalepsy induced by haloperidol at a higher dose of 0.5 mg/kg. These results indicate that co-administration with L-DOPA + carbidopa and single treatment with bromocriptine can decrease haloperidol-induced catalepsy and bradykinesia in mice. Furthermore, our study suggests that pole test as well as catalepsy test is of value in the screening of drugs against neuroleptic-induced motor deficits.

Animals↗

A post hoc analysis of the impact on hostility and agitation of quetiapine and haloperidol among patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine, a drug with a broad pharmacologic profile (similar to that of clozapine), may show benefits for agitation in patients with psychoses. Also, quetiapine may be superior to placebo and either equal or superior to haloperidol in treating this symptom. Available data for other second-generation antipsychotic agents show that quetiapine may have better efficacy in improving agitation compared with haloperidol. OBJECTIVE: This reanalysis of a previously reported pivotal clinical trial assessed whether quetiapine or haloperidol has benefits for the treatment of hostility and agitation among patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 years of either sex and any ethnicity who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria and who were experiencing an acute exacerbation were recruited into the study. A priori, data from patients assigned to 4 therapeutically effective quetiapine treatment groups (150, 300, 600, and 750 mg) in a previously reported 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial were combined and compared with data from patients given haloperidol 12 mg or placebo on an agitation measure derived from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Patients who received at least 2 weeks of treatment who had a baseline assessment and at least 1 postbaseline assessment after the 2 weeks of treatment were included. An analysis of variance with the baseline hostility score and center as covariates was used to assess treatment effects of quetiapine or haloperidol versus placebo for changes in agitation scores. A path analysis was used to separate the direct from the indirect effects (via improvements in psychoses and/or overall psychopathology) on agitation scores of quetiapine relative to haloperidol. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients (193 men, 64 women) were studied. The combined quetiapine groups comprised 175 patients; the haloperidol group, 42 patients; and the placebo group, 40 patients. Quetiapine treatment reduced agitation scores significantly among patients with acute psychoses compared with placebo. A slight reduction in agitation scores was found when haloperidol treatment was compared with placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant. Compared with haloperidol, quetiapine treatment had a direct and significant effect on agitation that was independent of the improvement in psychotic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The data in this study suggest that quetiapine treatment has benefits for hostility and agitation among patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Furthermore, the path analysis indicated that, relative to haloperidol, quetiapine appeared to have direct effects on agitation that were independent of improvements in psychoses or overall psychopathology, as assessed by the BPRS.

Adolescent↗

Muscarinic, adenosine A(2) and histamine H(3) receptor modulation of haloperidol-induced c-fos expression in the striatum and nucleus accumbens.

It is generally believed that haloperidol exerts its motor side effects and therapeutic effects mainly by antagonizing dopamine D(2) receptors in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens, respectively. Several neurotransmitters/modulators, including glutamate, acetylcholine, adenosine and histamine, affect dopaminergic activity in these centers. We have recently shown that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated modulation of haloperidol-induced c-fos expression differs in functionally specific regions of the striatum and the nucleus accumbens. In the present study, the entire striatum and the nucleus accumbens were comprehensively examined for the pattern of modulation of haloperidol-induced c-fos expression by adenosine A(2), histamine H(3) and muscarinic receptor antagonists. Blockade of muscarinic and H(3) receptors resulted in a profound suppression of haloperidol-induced c-fos expression in the dorsolateral part of the striatum. In addition, the H(3) receptor antagonist suppressed the effects of haloperidol in the ventrolateral aspect of the striatum and the rostral parts of the medial striatum. Muscarinic receptor antagonists suppressed haloperidol-induced c-fos expression throughout the shell and in the mid-level of the core of the nucleus accumbens while A(2) and H(3) receptor antagonists did not.We found that the muscarinic and H(3) receptor antagonists suppress the induction of c-fos by haloperidol in the dorsolateral aspect of the striatum, an area implicated in the development of extrapyramidal motor symptoms following chronic haloperidol treatment. By contrast, haloperidol-induced c-fos expression in the nucleus accumbens, an area implicated in the therapeutic effects of haloperidol, was suppressed by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, but not by the H(3) receptor antagonist. Therefore we conclude that H(3) receptor modulation may provide a useful therapeutic target in future efforts to minimize neuroleptic-induced motor side effects.

Animals↗

The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan reverses catalepsy induced by haloperidol in rats independent of striatal dopamine release: role of serotonergic mechanisms.

The alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan may improve motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and experimental Parkinsonism. We studied the effect of idazoxan on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats, an animal model of the drug-induced extrapyramidal side effects in man. Catalepsy was induced by a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and measured by the bar test for a maximum of 5 min. At 3 h after haloperidol, rats were given 0.16-5.0 mg/kg s.c. idazoxan, and descent latency was measured 1 h later. Idazoxan potently reversed haloperidol-induced catalepsy with an ED(50) of 0.25 mg/kg. This effect was mimicked by the selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist RS-15385-197 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg orally). We assessed how dopaminergic mechanisms were involved in the anticataleptic effect of idazoxan by studying its effect on dopamine (DA) release in the striatum, with the microdialysis technique in conscious rats. Idazoxan (0.3 and 2.5 mg/kg) had no effect on extracellular DA and did not modify the rise of extracellular DA induced by haloperidol, indicating that changes of striatal DA release were not involved in the reversal of catalepsy. The anticataleptic effect of 2.5 mg/kg idazoxan (haloperidol+vehicle 288+/-8 s, haloperidol+idazoxan 47+/-22 s) was attenuated in rats given an intraventricular injection of 150 microg of the serotonin (5-HT) neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (haloperidol+vehicle 275+/-25 s, haloperidol+idazoxan 137+/-28 s). The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100 635 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) did not affect the anticataleptic effect of idazoxan. The results suggest that idazoxan reversed haloperidol-induced catalepsy by a mechanism involving blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and, at least in part, 5-HT neurons.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists↗

Modification of haloperidol-induced pattern of c-fos expression by serotonin agonists.

Acute challenge with clozapine and haloperidol produce different anatomical patterns of c-fos expression in the forebrain. The pharmacological profile of atypical antipsychotics suggests that serotonin might contribute to the unique therapeutic benefits of these drugs. In order to test this possibility, we examined the abilities of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A/2c agonists to modify the pattern of c-fos expression induced by haloperidol and clozapine. Various groups of rats were pretreated with either saline, DOI, 8-OH-DPAT, and 8-OH-DPAT + DOI 30 min prior to haloperidol or clozapine administration. Rats were killed 90 min after antipsychotic administration. In saline-pretreated rats, haloperidol produced intense Fos-LI in all four striatal quadrants while the effect of clozapine was restricted to the medial part of the striatum. Prior administration of 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced haloperidol-induced Fos-LI in all four striatal quadrants while DOI and 8-OHDPAT + DOI significantly reduced Fos-LI only in dorso- and ventrolateral quadrants. In the nucleus accumbens, haloperidol induced intense Fos-LI in the core and the shell regions whereas clozapine induced c-fos expression only in the shell. Pretreatment with 8-OHDPAT in haloperidol treated rats reduced Fos-LI in the core region yielding to a c-fos pattern similar to that induced by clozapine. In the prefrontal cortex of saline-pretreated rats, haloperidol produced a moderate c-fos expression compared with the intense expression produced by clozapine. Pretreatment with serotonin agonists before haloperidol brought the number of FOS-positive neurons to the same level as in clozapine treated rats. These results show the ability of 5-HT agonists to transform the typical pattern of c-fos expression induced by haloperidol into a pattern resembling that of clozapine.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Carotid body dopamine content and release by short-term hypoxia: effect of haloperidol and alpha methyl paratyrosine.

Dopamine (DA) is thought to modulate the transduction of the hypoxic stimulus by the glomus cell in the carotid body (CB). The hypothesis tested here is that presynaptic DA D2 receptors (D2's) located on the type 1 cell function as autoreceptors to control DA release and/or synthesis. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of blocking D2's with haloperidol and DA synthesis with alpha methyl paratyrosine (AMPT) on the in vitro carotid body DA response to hypoxia. 54 CB's sampled from adult rabbits were incubated for one hour in a surviving medium bubbled with either 100% O2 or 8% O2 Sixteen CB's served as control (100% O2: n = 8, 8% O2: n = 8), 18 (100% O2: n = 8, 8% O2: n = 10) were sampled from rabbits pretreated with AMPT and 20 (100% O2: n = 12, 8% O2: n = 8) were incubated with micromolar concentrations of haloperidol. At the end of exposure. DA contained in the carotid body (DACB) and released in the surviving medium (DAr) were measured by HPLC. In 100% O2 DACB was not different between either AMPT or haloperidol and control, but DAr was significantly higher in the haloperidol group compared with control (mean +/- SE: 26.6 +/- 7.4 versus 7.6 +/- 2.0 pmol/h, P < 0.02). In 8% O2, control DACB (576 +/- 133 pmol/CB) was significantly higher than AMPT or haloperidol (respectively 228 +/- 29.6 and 246 +/- 49.9 pmol/CB, P < 0.01) and control DAr (234 +/- 72.3 pmol/h) was also significantly higher than AMPT or haloperidol (respectively 28.8 +/- 5.2 and 40.6 +/- 11.4 pmol/h, P < 0.01). Finally, DAr was significantly larger in 8% O2 than in 100% O2 in control and AMPT groups (P < 0.01), but not in the haloperidol group. The increase in DAr by haloperidol in the resting CB is consistent with the blockade of D2's regulating DA release. The decreased DAr in 8% O2 after AMPT suggests that increased DA synthesis contributes to maintain DA secretion by the type I cell exposed to short term hypoxia. The lack of difference in DAr between 8% O2 and 100% O2 after haloperidol probably reflects non specific--i.e., D2 independent--effect of micromolar concentration of haloperidol on DA synthesis and/or sodium-calcium exchangers during hypoxia.

Analysis of Variance↗

Effect of ethanol, haloperidol, and lorazepam on cardiac conduction and contraction.

Haloperidol and lorazepam are commonly used to sedate ethanol (E)-intoxicated patients in emergency departments. This study was conducted to explore the role of ethanol in altering the potency of haloperidol and lorazepam with respect to cardiac conduction and contraction. For mechanical studies, isolated rat hearts were studied under isovolumetric conditions by using standard Langendorff technique. Hearts were perfused with Krebs-Heinseleit-Bicarbonate buffer containing haloperidol or lorazepam in concentrations ranging from 100 to 750 ng/ml (one heart per drug concentration). For both haloperidol and lorazepam individually, significant reductions in Left ventricular-generated pressure (LVGP) were observed at a concentration of 750 ng/ml (haloperidol = 2,250 nM and lorazepam = 2,000 nM). The addition of 20 and 65 mM ethanol shifted the concentration-response effect of haloperidol such that LVGP was significantly reduced at haloperidol = 500 and 300 ng/ml, respectively (p < 0.05 vs. basal control; paired t test). Ethanol produced no observable shift on the lorazepam concentration-response for LVGP. For electrophysiologic studies, hearts were perfused with haloperidol and lorazepam (300 ng/ml) +/- 65 mM ethanol. Compared with basal control, E + H significantly decreased heart rate (-74 +/- 12 beats/min) and increased His-ventricular conduction time (+7.6 +/- 1.5 ms vs. +1.7 +/- 0.6 ms for control hearts). Both haloperidol and EH significantly increased atrioventricular (AV) effective refractory period and the atrioventricular-His (AH) conduction interval. No significant changes in any electrophysiologic parameter were observed with ethanol or lorazepam perfused individually or with the combination of ethanol and lorazepam. Ethanol potentiates haloperidol-induced electromechanical depression of isolated rat hearts. Ethanol had no such effect on lorazepam.

Alcoholic Intoxication↗

Co-administration of sertraline and haloperidol.

Along with recent increased interest in the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, a number of studies has been undertaken to observe interactions with different drugs. When selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor was administered together with antipsychotics to schizophrenics showing depressive or obsessive symptoms and negative symptoms, meaningful results were observed. The objective of our research was to identify the changes in the concentration of plasma haloperidol when sertraline was administered to patients who already were being treated with haloperidol. Sixteen patients who did not respond to the traditional antipsychotics after 2 weeks of treatment with a certain dosage of haloperidol were administered with 50 mg of sertraline for a period of 2 weeks. The concentration changes between plasma haloperidol and the reduced haloperidol were observed using high-powered liquid chromatography equipped with a UV detector. There was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the concentration of haloperidol, the change being from 8.52 +/- 4.22 to 10.91 +/- 5.38 ng/mL. However, the change in the concentration of reduced haloperidol was from 7.41 +/- 7.93 to 5.22 +/- 6.10 ng/mL, showing a significant decrease. The concentrations of total plasma haloperidol showed no significant changes at all. In comparing the ratio of the reduced haloperidol and the haloperidol, the reduction ratio was down to 0.39 +/- 0.27 from 0.94 +/- 0.65 showing a significant decrease. There seems to be few studies done on interactions using serotonergic drugs together with antipsychotics in spite of their clinically applicable possibility. According to similar studies done in the past, co-administering of such drugs not only increases the plasma concentration of antipsychotics, but it also results in clinical improvement of negative symptoms and aggravation of extrapyramidal symptoms. Changes in clinical symptoms and adverse effects were not observed in our study. However, we think these observations need to be included in upcoming larger scale studies.

Adult↗

Prevention by (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin of both catalepsy and the rises in rat striatal dopamine metabolism caused by haloperidol.

1. The influence of (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on haloperidol-induced increases in the dopamine metabolites, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylacetic acid (HVA), was measured in three microdissected brain regions of the rat following a quantitative assessment of catalepsy. 2. Haloperidol alone (2.66 mumol kg-1, i.p.) caused a robust cataleptic response. Given 30 min after haloperidol, 8-OH-DPAT (76 or 760 nmol kg-1, s.c.) prevented catalepsy in 30% and 100% of rats, respectively. 3. Haloperidol significantly increased the DOPAC (by 2 to 4 fold) and HVA (by 3 to 7 fold) contents of the caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex. Given alone, only the lower dose of 8-OH-DPAT caused a significant biochemical change, a doubling of cortical DOPAC. 4. In the cases where catalepsy was prevented by either dose of 8-OH-DPAT, the haloperidol-induced increases in DOPAC and HVA were consistently lower in the caudate-putamen. This pattern was true for the rise in cortical HVA but only in response to the lower dose of 8-OH-DPAT. In contrast, neither dose of 8-OH-DPAT was able to influence the haloperidol-induced rises in cortical DOPAC. In the nucleus accumbens, 8-OH-DPAT did not affect the haloperidol-induced increases in the dopamine metabolites, irrespective of the dose employed or the resulting behaviour. When catalepsy was not prevented, 8-OH-DPAT did not alter the neurochemical responses to haloperidol in any region. 5. These results suggest that part of the mechanism by which 8-OH-DPAT prevents haloperidol-induced catalepsy is reflected by a reversal of the compensatory increase in meso-striatal and/or meso-cortical dopamine neuronal activity that normally accompanies postsynaptic dopamine receptor blockade with haloperidol.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗