Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FORCEPS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Hot biopsy forceps in the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions.

Electrocoagulation bronchoscopy biopsy forceps may prevent bleeding, but could also impair the quality of the specimens obtained. Patients with endobronchial lesions during bronchoscopy underwent six endobronchial biopsies each with a hot biopsy forceps, alternating between with electrocoagulation ("hot") and without ("cold"). Bleeding was quantified on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being no bleeding. The generator was set on "soft coagulation" mode, with power settings of 40, 60, 80 and 100 W for each group of 10 patients in a sequential fashion. Clinical pathology results were recorded before samples were reviewed by a second, blinded, pulmonary pathologist. A total of 39 patients with 40 endobronchial lesions had six biopsies performed (one patient had only four samples taken), giving a total of 238 biopsy samples. Concordance between hot and cold samples was 92.5% for the clinical pathologist and 87% for the blinded pathologist. Paired analysis suggested lower average bleeding score with the use of hot forceps. Overall bleeding rates for cold and hot biopsies, respectively, were as follows: grade 1: 30.3 and 41.2%; grade 2: 62.2 and 49.6%; grade 3: 7.6 and 9.2%; and grade 4: 0 and 0%. In conclusion, the use of hot biopsy forceps for endobronchial biopsy does not appear to have a negative impact on the pathological samples. Hot biopsy forceps showed a statistically significant reduction in bleeding score, which is unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[An electrosurgical burn possibly caused by radio-frequency leakage current through a stainless forceps].

A 73-year-old operated female got burned on the skin probably nipped by a stainless forceps. An active cable had been coiled around the forceps throughout the surgery. Consequently, an electrosurgical burn was possibly caused by radio-frequency leakage current (RFLC) via the metallic forceps. The authors experimentally coiled active cables around a stainless forceps, then measured RFLC produced by four kinds of electrosurgical units in the modes of cutting, blend, coagulation, spray coagulation, and argon beam coagulation. The maximum of RFLC was 81 mA, which met the JIS or IEC standard (150 mA). However, the critical current density causing electrosurgical burns (> 25-70 mA.cm-2) was suggested to be produced by RFLC through a metallic forceps with a small diameter. Of great importance is not to coil active cables around electro-conductible instruments during surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

[Hepatitis C virus contamination of endoscopes and biopsy forceps].

BACKGROUND: Procedures such as digestive endoscopy may explain some unclear contaminations by HCV. AIMS: The aims of this study were to detect HCV genome on endoscopes and biopsy-forceps used in patients with known chronic HCV infection and to determine its presence in their gastric juice and saliva. METHODS: A gastroscopy with antral biopsies was performed in 48 patients with non-treated replicative chronic hepatitis C. Samples were obtained after pushing 10 mL of sterile water through the biopsy-suction channel and after immersing the brush used to clean this channel. The biopsy-forceps were also immersed and their tips brushed in 10 mL of sterile water. This sampling technique was repeated three times: immediately after the endoscopic procedure (T0), after washing with a detergent (T1) and after immersion for 20 minutes in a 2% glutaraldehyde solution (T2). The HCV genome was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR, Amplicor - Roche Diagnostics Systems). For the last 15 patients, samples of gastric juice and saliva were obtained before antral biopsies and used to detect HCV genome. RESULTS: HCV genome was detected in the biopsy-suction channel in 13 cases (27%) at T0 and in one case (2%) at T1. It was undetectable after completion of the disinfection procedure (T2). Three biopsy-forceps (6%) were PCR positive immediately after the endoscopy but none at T1 and T2. HCV genome was found in the gastric juice in three cases. In all of them, it was also found at T0 in the biopsy-suction channel but not on the biopsy-forceps. When saliva contained HCV genome (4 cases), it was present in the biopsy-suction channel in only one case. In this case, the gastric juice was also PCR positive. CONCLUSIONS: HCV genome is detected in 27% of cases in the biopsy-suction channel after an endoscopic procedure performed on patients with chronic HCV infection. The biopsy-forceps are PCR positive in 6% of cases. The infected gastric juice may play a role in the contamination of the endoscopes. The complete disinfection procedure seems effective to eliminate HCV.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2006

Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the decision-to-delivery interval for forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of all instrumental deliveries over a 1-year period in a delivery ward of a university tertiary health care facility was performed. The decision-to-delivery interval was compared between forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. RESULTS: The decision-to-delivery interval was 8.6+/-5.4 and 13.8+/-6.2 min for forceps and vacuum deliveries, respectively (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: It appears that it is quicker to accomplish forceps delivery than vacuum extraction.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2004

Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery in a large population of females managed by trained obstetricians in a French hospital and to identify factors predictive for anal sphincter injury. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of healthy females older than 18 years with no history of anal incontinence, anorectal abnormalities, or anorectal surgery after their first vaginal delivery. All females were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire concerning intestinal transit and continence status. Physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography were performed after delivery. RESULTS: Between November 1999 and November 2000, 93 females were included in the study after their first forceps delivery. Eleven patients (11.8 percent) had a partial defect involving the external sphincter, visible on ultrasonography. One patient (1.1 percent) had a partial defect of external sphincter with complete defect of internal sphincter (sequelae of primary repair of a third-degree perineal tear). Seventeen patients (18.2 percent) had flatus incontinence, and four patients (4.3 percent) had liquid stool incontinence. A high daily number of stools was significantly associated with sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (P=0.02). The development of anal incontinence was not related to sphincter defect on ultrasonography. There was a strong association between perineal tear and sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (odds ratio, 4.5 (range, 1.2-16.7)). CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery was identified in <13 percent of our large population of healthy females. Our study does not confirm previous observations that anal sphincter injury is common after forceps delivery; previously published studies may have overestimated the prevalence of this condition. The only factor with significant predictive value for anal sphincter injury was perineal tear. Anal endosonography should be recommended after obstetric perineal tear.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Anal sphincter injury, fecal and urinary incontinence: a 34-year follow-up after forceps delivery.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the long-term outcome of forceps delivery in terms of evidence of anal sphincter injury and the incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence. METHODS: Women who delivered in 1964 were evaluated by using endoanal ultrasound, manometry, and a continence questionnaire. Women delivered by forceps were matched with the next normal delivery and elective cesarean delivery in the birth register. RESULTS: The women's overall obstetric history was evaluated. Women who had ever had a forceps delivery (n = 42) had a significantly higher incidence of sphincter rupture compared with women who had only unassisted vaginal deliveries (n = 41) and elective cesarean sections (n = 6) (44 vs. 22 vs. 0 percent; chi-squared 7.09; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the incidence of significant fecal incontinence between the three groups (14 vs. 10 vs. 0 percent) or significant urinary incontinence (7 vs. 19 vs. 0 percent). CONCLUSION: Anal sphincter injury was associated with forceps delivery in the past; however, significant fecal and urinary incontinence was not.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2005

[Decision-to-deliver interval for forceps delivery and cesarean section: 137 extractions for abnormal fetal heart rhythm during labor].

AIM: Comparison of the decision to delivery interval in cases of forceps delivery and in cases of cesarean sections. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed on 137 cases of forceps deliver (n = 63) and cesarean section (n = 74) indicated for abnormal fetal heart rhythm. All cases were observed in a level 3 maternity unit between October 2003 and August 2004. RESULTS: The mean decision-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the forceps group (14.84 min +/- 6.54 versus 29.31 min +/- 11.79 p < 0.0001). Maternal and neonatal morbidity were comparable. CONCLUSION: This study suggest that once the fetal head is engaged, forceps delivery can significantly reduced the decision-to-delivery interval.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Forceps and vacuum delivery: expectations of residency and fellowship training program directors.

The objective of this study is to compare current forceps training practices in North American obstetrical residency training programs with that in maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs. We sent a survey to all obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs and to all maternal-fetal medicine fellowship programs in North America. After sending out 354 questionnaires, 219 were returned for a response rate of 62%. The response rate for fellowship programs (52 of 59; 88%) was significantly greater than that of residency training programs (167 of 295; 56.6%) (p < 0.05). All fellowship training programs were using the 1988 ACOG forceps classification system, as were 98% of the residency training programs. Eighty-five percent of fellowship directors and 80% of residency directors felt the same system should be used for vacuum deliveries. All residency and fellowship directors expected proficiency with both instruments for outlet deliveries. For low deliveries requiring < or =45 degrees of rotation, at least 92% expected proficiency with both instruments. For low-forceps deliveries with >45 degrees of rotation, 82% of fellowship directors and 80% of residency directors expected proficiency. For low-vacuum deliveries with >45 degrees of rotation, 80% of fellowship directors and 76% of residency directors expected proficiency. Significantly more fellowship directors expected midforceps proficiency (47%) than did residency program directors (38%) (p < 0.05). Midvacuum proficiency was expected by 73% of fellowship directors and 69% of residency directors. The ACOG 1988 forceps classification system has now achieved wide acceptance and is taught by both residency and fellowship program directors. Most program directors favor using the same classification system for vacuum extraction deliveries. In general, the expectations of the residency program directors mirror those of maternal-fetal medicine fellowship directors. While outlet and low operations with < or =45 degrees of rotation are taught and proficiency is expected, most programs no longer expect proficiency in midforceps delivery, but do expect proficiency in midvacuum delivery. Proficiency in low operations with rotations < or =45 degrees is still expected.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the incidence of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective study in primiparous women delivered by forceps (n = 90), vacuum (n = 75), or spontaneous vaginal delivery (n = 150). Follow-up for urinary incontinence was at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after delivery. RESULTS: The incidence of urinary incontinence was similar in the 3 groups at 2 weeks after delivery. The proportion of women developing new-onset urinary incontinence decreased significantly over time in the spontaneous vaginal (P =.003) and vacuum delivery groups (P =.009) but not in the forceps group (P =.2). No relationship of urinary incontinence with vaginal lacerations, epidural anesthesia, length of second stage of labor, or infant birth weight was seen. CONCLUSIONS: In primiparous women, urinary incontinence after forceps delivery is more likely to persist compared with spontaneous vaginal or vacuum delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Risk factors for forceps delivery in nulliparous patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for forceps delivery during first pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was carried out in a tertiary maternity ward between January 2001 and December 2003. A total of 582 nulliparous women, with full-term (>37 weeks gestation), singleton, cephalic pregnancies, who delivered by the vaginal route with or without instrumental assistance were evaluated. RESULTS: The strongest risk factors for forceps delivery were birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR: 6.5; 95% CI: 1.6, 26.9), the occiput posterior position of the fetal head (OR: 5.8; 95% CI: 2.5, 13.8), and epidural analgesia (OR: 7.7; 95% CI: 4.1, 14.7). Other significant risk factors for forceps delivery were age over 35 years (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 5.1), induction of labor (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.4, 3.1), first stage of labor longer than 420 min (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3,4.2), and a prolonged second stage of labor (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.4). CONCLUSION: Age over 35 years and induction of labor are risk factors for forceps delivery at admission. Epidural use, fetal head in occiput posterior position, and birth weight >4000 g are strong intrapartum risk factors for instrumental delivery in nulliparous women.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.

A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 552 cases in which Kielland's forceps were used for rotation and delivery, 95 cases in which other forceps were used for rotation and delivery, and 160 cases in which manual rotation and forceps were used. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal morbidity between the three groups, regardless of whether the indication for delivery was delay in the second stage of labour or fetal distress. When Kielland's forceps were used by junior staff, significantly more vaginal and cervical lacerations and primary postpartum haemorrhage occurred, but there was no increase in fetal morbidity.

Extraction, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1979

Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

The incidence of certain neonatal complications associated with the use of Kielland's forceps was analyzed retrospectively in liveborn singleton babies delivered at this hospital between January and December 1976. The neonatal mortality rate attributable to use of the forceps was 34.9 per 1000. The incidences of delayed onset of respiration (17.4%), birth trauma (15.1%), and abnormal neurological behaviour--namely, apathy or irritability or both--(23.3%) significantly exceeded those in a matched group of babies born spontaneously. Fetal asphyxia played a major part in the aetiology of neonatal complications. Babies on whom Kielland's forceps were used, however, had a significantly greater incidence of abnormal neurological behaviour even in the absence of fetal asphyxia (14.3%), and in all of these babies the abnormal behaviour was transient and did not necessitate admission to the special-care baby unit. Neither maternal height nor the infant's birth weight or occipitofrontal head circumference influenced the occurrence of neonatal complications. The results also suggest that neither the speed of cervical dilatation nor the timing of engagement of the fetal head is of help in predicting the occurrence of neonatal complications after the use of Kielland's forceps.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed1993

[The Vienna obstetric forceps].

The 'Wiener Schulzange' was first used by the Second Medical School in Vienna, the beginning of which must be assumed around the year 1848, and goes back to Sir James Young Simpson in Edinburgh and Carl Braun Ritter von Fernwald in Vienna. The forceps was produced in Vienna by Josef Leiter, who was well known for making surgical instruments. Names like Francis Henry Ramsbotham, John Aitken, David Evans, Dietrich Wilhelm Heinrich Busch and Hermann Josef Brünninghausen are connected with the development of the Viennese forceps; its English lock goes back to William Smellie. The arms of the Viennese forceps, which, being a forceps of the crossed type, forms a two-armed lever, were originally forged from one piece each and brazed with the separately manufactured handles.

Austria↗
PubMed1986

Experience with the Bamberg obstetrical forceps.

The design and use of a divergent obstetrical forceps, which was developed at the Staatliche Frauenklinik und Hebammenschule in Bamberg by Sipli and Krone are presented. The major advantage associated with the use of this instrument is that it permits the exertion of a limited constant application force (max 300 g) on the fetal head. Thus, compression injuries are effectively prevented and slippage of the forceps with resultant trauma is precluded. The Bamberg forceps was evaluated at the Frauenklinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universität München and at the Staatliche Frauenklinik und Hebammenschule Bamberg, Federal Republic of Germany. An evaluation of 483 cases where this forceps was used is presented. No serious complications directly attributable to the use of this instrument could be documented.

Apgar Score↗
PubMed1984

Boys born by forceps and vacuum extraction examined at 18 years of age.

An 18-year follow-up study was made of 62 males delivered by forceps and 38 by vacuum extraction in 1962-63. The obstetrical data are compared with the medical and psychological military draft board examinations. The mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different from those of the total cohort of Norwegian conscripts, either in the forceps or in the vacuum group. Rotation of the fetal head with Kielland's forceps in midcavity extractions did not adversely affect the late results. A significantly elevated mean intelligence score was found in the forceps group, while the vacuum group did not differ from the national average.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps.

A retrospective study over 15 months showed that 10.7% of primigravid women and 1.6% of multigravid women were delivered by Kielland's forceps: a total of 145 babies. The successful vaginal delivery rate for attempted Kielland's forceps was 96.7%. The neonatal outcome was good and there were no perinatal deaths. Traumatic injuries were present in 7.6% of babies and were minor. The data show that even in the presence of fetal distress, Kielland's forceps can be safely employed for rotational delivery from the mid-pelvic cavity. This approach can avoid some caesarean sections without undue risk to the baby, the caesarean rate being 9.5%. As 10.7% of primigravid women required rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps, it is desirable that primigravid women should be cared for by obstetricians who are skilled in the use of the instrument, in order to maintain a low caesarean section rate in this group, with a good neonatal outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of assisted vaginal delivery with forceps and with vacuum extractor].

UNLABELLED: We performed a prospective, controlled, randomized trial to compare de safety and efficacy between the vaginal assisted delivery with vacum extractor forceps. We included a control group of primigravidae. We use the ACOG application criteria for operative obstetrics. We measured the differences in regard to indication for operative delivery, obstetric trauma and the general characteristics of the patients. A total of 210 patients were included which were distributed in three groups. In the first group we included the patients of vacum extractor, the second group of forceps and the third the control group. In our results we found no statistically significant differences among three groups in regard to the general characteristics and obstetric trauma. In the vacum extractor group we found six cefalohematomas (8.5%), two newborns with skin laceration (2.8%) and four newborns with cerebral edema (5.7%). In the forceps group we had two newborns diagnosed with cefalohematomas (2.8%), seven newborns with cerebral edema (10%) and scalp laceration on four newborns (6%). In the control group we found one cefalohematoma (1.4%) and cerebral edema in four newborns (5.7%). We did not find statistically significant differences when we compared the group of the vacum and the forceps. CONCLUSION: With this information we concluded that both instruments are equal in regard to efficacy and safety when they are use by experimented hands and following the application criteria. Nevertheless, there is a high incidence of vaginal injuries and obstetric trauma in the newborn in the operative delivery compared with the control group without an important increase in the perinatal mortality.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.

To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with forceps and vacuum delivery, data on 150 women delivered by forceps and 420 delivered by vacuum extraction between 1995 and 1999 at Queen Ala Hospital, Jordan were compared. Data included parity, gestational age, infant birthweight, Apgar score, presentation and station of fetal head, indications for forceps and vacuum deliveries, delivery success rate, and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Maternal birth canal and genital tract lacerations were significantly more common in forceps delivery, and there was significantly increased morbidity in infants delivered by vacuum extraction (caput, jaundice, cephalohaematoma). Serous neonatal morbidity was rare for both groups.

Adult↗