Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ERCP”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

ERCP findings and the role of endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute gallstone pancreatitis.

A total of 131 patients with acute pancreatitis (of whom 100 had gallstones) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the same hospital admission. Urgent ERCP (less than 72 h) was performed in 68 cases and early ERCP (3-30 days) in 63 cases; 47 had predicted severe attacks and 84 had predicted mild attacks (modified Glasgow criteria). The highest incidence of common bile duct stones occurred in those with predicted severe attacks and those who had urgent ERCP. Highly significant correlations were found between age and common bile duct and pancreatic duct diameters. Significant correlations were also found between the common bile duct and pancreatic duct (correcting for age) and between these and the admission serum bilirubin. The common bile duct diameter was greatest in those with common bile duct stones and predicted severe attacks. A considerably lower incidence of pancreatic duct filling occurred in those with predicted severe attacks and common bile duct stones; in predicted mild attacks the pancreatic duct diameter was greater in those with common bile duct stones. In gallstone patients complications were highest in those with predicted severe attacks but more significantly in those with common bile duct stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was undertaken in 37 patients with common bile duct stones without mortality. The overall complication rate in gallstone patients was 19 per cent and the mortality rate was 2 per cent. These findings suggest that common bile duct stones cause acute common bile duct and pancreatic duct obstruction and are closely associated with complications. Urgent ERCP for detection of common bile duct stones, and endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment, is strongly recommended for patients with predicted severe attacks due to gallstones and should also be considered for others who fail to show clinical improvement.

Acute Disease↗

Selective use of ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCH) various strategies have been proposed for the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. In a consecutive series of 1140 patients subjected to LCH, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was attempted in 128 patients (11.2%) and successfully accomplished in 121 (94.5%). Based on the prediction of CBD stones by laboratory tests, ultrasonography, and intravenous cholangiography, prelaparoscopic ERCP was performed in 106 patients (9.3%). CBD stones were identified in 56 patients and benign papillary stenosis in 5 patients (57.5%). Of these 61 patients, 58 (95%) were treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction followed by LCH after a mean interval of 1.6 days. Three patients with failure of endoscopic ductal stone extraction required open CBD exploration. In 39 of the 106 patients (36.8%) ERCP was negative for ductal stones but revealed unexpected ampullary and pancreatic cancer in two cases. Six patients (of the 106) with preoperative ERCP cannulation failure (5.7%) were managed either by LCH and intraoperative cholangiography or by open CBD exploration. In 22 of the 1140 total patients (1.9%) ERCP was performed at various intervals after LCH. Retained CBD stones were found in eight patients, and ES and ductal clearance was achieved in all eight. There was no mortality among the entire surgical group who underwent perioperative ERCP/ES. Including two cases of ES-related pancreatitis, the overall morbidity was 5.5% (7 of 128). Perioperative ERCP/ES in conjunction with LCH is an attractive approach for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, at least until laparoscopic ductal clearance becomes a standard procedure.

Adolescent↗

Intravenous cholangiography, ERCP, and selective operative cholangiography in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Between March 1990 and March 1993 some 822 consecutive patients underwent an attempt at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intravenous cholangiography (IVC), ERCP, and selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) were used in the evaluation of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Two hundred thirteen patients (26%) were identified preoperatively with either abnormal liver functions or a dilated common bile duct suggestive of CBD stones. IVC was performed in 143 patients (67%). Choledocholithiasis was identified in 14 patients (10%). Preoperative therapeutic ERCP was successful in all 14 patients (100%). Diagnostic ERCP was attempted in 61 patients and successful in 59 (97%). Choledocholithiasis was identified in 25 patients (41%). Successful extraction was accomplished in 23 patients (92%). Transcystic common bile duct exploration was used effectively in the patients with an unsuccessful ERCP. IOC was attempted in 50 patients and successful in 48 (96%). Choledocholithiasis was identified in three (6%). A retained CBD stone was present in eight patients (1%). There was one level I CBD injury (0.122%). The use of IVC, selective ERCP, and selective IOC is a reasonable approach in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Cholangiography↗

ERCP, cholangiography, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) opinion survey.

With the increased use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the roles of preoperative ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) may be changing. SAGES members were surveyed to define opinions regarding use of ERCP and cholangiography during LC. Thirty-seven percent of the surveys were returned. Most respondents (83%) performed LC, reporting data on 19,747 LCs. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 4% of cases. Complications were reported in 1.7% patients. IOC was attempted in 51.2% cases and was successful in 73%. Routine IOC was only recommended by approximately 50% of respondents. However, 80% recommended IOC for patients with multiple small gallstones and a dilated cystic duct. If preoperative liver function tests (LFTs) were mildly elevated (1.5 x normal), only 56% of respondents recommended preoperative ERCP. However, 73% of respondents suggested preoperative ERCP for more severe LFT abnormalities. If preoperative ERCP demonstrated choledocholithiasis, most (85%) recommended endoscopic clearance of stones followed by LC. These opinions will be helpful in establishing practice standards for LC.

Adult↗

ERCP update: diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Endoscopic retograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently utilized to evaluate jaundice, both intra- and extrahepatic, and can differentiate between these by demonstrating specific anatomic lesions. ERCP is definitive in the evaluation of gallbladder disease when other modalities are indefinite. For the first time outside the operating room, the pancreatic duct can be opacified by ERCP. The newest application of ERCP, endoscopic papillotomy (EP), has revolutionized the treatment of common bile duct gallstones and stenosis of the duct, offering a safe and effective alternative to repeated surgery, especially in those patients at risk. Because of these diverse and effective applications, ERCP has become firmly established in our diagnostic armamentarium.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Postcholecystectomy syndrome in northern India--study on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of ERCP.

One hundred and twenty two patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome were studied by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The procedure was successful in 105 patients (85.3%) and it accurately detected abnormality of the pancreatico-biliary system in 71 patients (67.6%). ERCP results were abnormal in 82.6% of patients with biliary symptoms, with or without jaundice, compared with 34.7% of patients with non-biliary symptoms (P less than 0.001). Though ERCP showed abnormality in all patients with biliary symptoms and jaundice, as many as 70.4% of patients without jaundice had abnormal ERCP. The commonest abnormality was retained/recurrent stones (37/105 patients). Patients with biliary strictures presented significantly more often with jaundice compared with patients with biliary stones (74.3% vs 22.3%). In 19 of the 37 patients with retained biliary stones endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed and it was successful in 16 patients (84.2%). Our data indicates that ERCP detects the anatomical level as well as the nature of lesion accurately, and is essential and safe in the diagnosis and management of patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

The diagnostic evaluation of ERCP in pancreatic and biliary carcinoma.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 77 cases of pancreatic carcinoma, 47 cases of carcinoma of the common bile duct and 45 cases of carcinoma of the gall bladder. In order to evaluate ERCP in pancreatic and biliary carcinoma, success rates of desired duct cannulation and some problems in the interpretation of ERCP findings were discussed. In 2 cases (2.6%) of pancreatic carcinoma, 6 cases (13.0%) of carcinoma of the common bile duct and 8 cases (17.8%) of carcinoma of the gall bladder were failed to visualized the desired ducts by ERCP. In pancreatic carcinoma, false negative cases in the interpretation of ERCP findings were encountered in 4 cases (4.6%). Similarly, false positive cases were encountered in 12 patients (13.6%). On the other hand, 4 false negative were encountered in cases of which carcinoma of the gall bladder could not detected and 4 false positive cases were encountered in cases with inflamatory disease of the common bile duct.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗

ERCP in the management of patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy: re-appraising current indications.

This study assessed the ability of biochemical tests and ultrasound to predict the presence of ductal calculi, and thereby refine the indications for ERCP, in patients before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirteen of fifty-three patients investigated before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and four of seventeen investigated after had stones confirmed at ERCP. The most sensitive indices for stones were raised serum alkaline phosphatase (0.76), aspartate transferase (0.75) and alanine transferase (0.76). The most specific indices were an abnormal ultrasound (0.92), raised serum amylase (0.78) and raised bilirubin (0.75). Serum bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were all normal in twenty-seven patients and all of these had normal ERCPs. If patients with normal bilirubin, amylase and ultrasound were not referred for ERCP, no stones would have been overlooked and the number of ERCPs could have been reduced by 39%.

Adolescent↗

Iopentol (Imagopaque 250) compared with diatrizoate (Urografin 219) in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). A clinical trial assessing safety (adverse events and S-pancreatic iso-amylase) and diagnostic information (VAS).

The efficacy and safety of the non-ionic contrast medium iopentol, 250 mg I/ml (Imagopaque, Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo, Norway) were evaluated and compared to those of the ionic contrast medium diatrizoate 219 mg I/ml (Urografin, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). The trial was carried out as a randomized, double-blind comparative two-group study. One hundred and sixteen patients completed the study: 59 received iopentol and 57 received diatrizoate, the contrast medium used according to routine hospital procedure for ERCP. Demographic data and details of the ERCP procedure were comparable for the two contrast medium groups. Safety was assessed by monitoring serum pancreatic iso-amylase and by recording adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated through assessment of the diagnostic information and the quality of radiographs. Twenty-one of the patients receiving iopentol and 27 of the patients receiving diatrizoate reported adverse events during the ERCP procedure. Pain was the kind of procedure-related event most frequently reported. Three patients experienced serious adverse events with a fatal outcome 2, 10 and 12 days after the ERCP procedure, respectively. The principal investigator concluded for all three serious adverse events that any causal relationship with the contrast medium injected was unlikely. A mean change in serum pancreatic iso-amylase after contrast medium injection was noted in both contrast medium groups. However, statistical analysis did not show any significant difference between mean changes for the two groups. The efficacy results, both in terms of diagnostic information and quality of radiographic visualisation, were comparable for the two contrast media. In conclusion, the study did not show any statistically significant differences between the two contrast media as regards safety or efficacy in ERCP.

Amylases↗

Needle-knife assisted ERCP.

BACKGROUND: During endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), incising through the wall of the major papilla with an electrocautery needle-knife is a method for achieving access into the bile duct. This procedure, often referred to as a "precut," may be used when cannulation attempts via the orifice of the papilla are unsuccessful. Potential complications include hemorrhage, duodenal perforation, and acute pancreatitis. METHODS: The 172 patients who underwent an attempt of a needle-knife assisted ERCP during the years 1997-2003 at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: A selective bile duct cannulation was achieved after needle-knife incision in 148 out of 172 patients (86%) at the primary session. In 10 additional patients (6%), a repeated procedure proved successful for cannulation. In the remaining 14 patients (8%), the biliary cannulation failed and was not attempted again. Complications after needle-knife assisted ERCP occurred as follows: three patients (2%) presented with late bleeding after the ERCP and three patients (2%) developed acute pancreatitis. None of the patients required operative treatment for complications. There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of the needle-knife markedly improves the success rate of selective biliary cannulation in ERCP without increasing the rate of complications.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called "rendezvous" technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown the efficacy and effectiveness of the combined endoscopic-laparoscopic "rendezvous" technique for treatment of gallbladder and bile duct stones without complications, particularly pancreatitis. The so-called rendezvous technique consists of laparoscopic cholecystectomy standards with intraoperative cholangiography followed by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). The sphincterotome is driven across the papilla through a guidewire inserted by the transcystic route. This method allows easier and faster cannulation, thus avoiding papillary edema and pancreatic trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this method is effective in eliminating ductal stones and to verify whether the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis is diminished. METHODS: From January 2002 to September 2004, we enrolled 256 patients with cholecystocholedolithiasis detected by transabdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. One hundred and twenty of these had one or more patient-related risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, so they were randomized into two groups of 60 patients. In group A, the patients were treated in a single step with videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography, and EST during the surgical procedure with the rendezvous technique. In group B, preoperative ERCP and EST were performed by using a traditional method of bile duct cannulation. RESULTS: No cases of post-ERCP pancreatitis were observed in group A, whereas six cases of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in group B (five mild and one moderate) (p = 0.0274). No procedure-related mortality was recorded. CONCLUSION: In cholecysthocholedocholithiasis, the combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in cases with patient-related risk factors for this complication.

Adult↗

How safe is ERCP to the endoscopist?

BACKGROUND: Interventional techniques in endoscopy such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have greatly increased since laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become widespread; mainly these techniques deal with common bile duct stones. Fluoroscopy is usually employed, and chronic exposure to X-ray, in spite of the relative low dose, can lead to potentially unhealthy conditions such as malignancies like bone marrow and other solid cancers. A median of 18 years of life is lost per fatal cancer, including the time of latency since exposure. Nor should one forget benign condition such as cataracts that can lead to partial or complete blindness and which surely impair life's quality. METHODS: Simulated examinations were carried at the University Hospital (São Paulo, Brazil) using an anthropomorphic phantom in place of the physician. Four sets of dosimeters were placed in the forehead, neck, torso, and lower abdomen (with and without a lead apron) and standard ERCP fluoroscopic techniques were employed. RESULTS: The dose equivalents were calculated and compared to the recommended exposure doses of national and international boards of radiation protection. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results found and compared to standards, working safely means: (1) A lead (0.5 mm thickness) apron is fundamental. Without it less than one ERCP\month should be performed. (2) With an apron, 23 examinations/month are allowed. (3) No thyroid protection grants only 19 exams/month. (4) Performing ERCP without lead glasses is hazardous to the eye, allowing only seven ERCPs monthly.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not necessary in mild gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The role of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in gallstone pancreatitis is unclear. Therefore, we designed a study to establish whether ERCP is indicated in these cases. METHOD: We studied 55 patients who had been admitted with gallstone pancreatitis. All of them had mild pancreatitis (Ranson's criteria <3). ERCP was carried out within 4 days of admission, once the liver function tests and serum amylase had returned to normal levels. RESULTS: ERCP did not demonstrate common bile duct stones in any of the patients. All patients then underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same admission. CONCLUSION: Preoperative ERCP is not indicated for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP.

Our purpose was to compare fluoroscopy time during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between endoscopists with different levels of experience. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 269 consecutive ERCPs at an academic hospital during 1 year. Median fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in more complex cases, such as in therapeutic (406.5 s [IQR, 235.5-685]) compared to diagnostic (202 s [IQR, 141-481]; P = 0.002) procedures. The experience (number of prior ERCPs) of gastroenterology fellows involved in procedures was an independent predictor of shorter fluoroscopy time when controlling for patient and procedure characteristics (P < 0.0001). Median fluoroscopy time was 2.73 min shorter after at least 50 procedures had been performed (P = 0.039). Time for ERCPs involving fellows was not significantly longer than cases by attending physicians alone (P = 0.23). Increased experience is associated with lower radiation exposure during ERCP training. Radiation reduction methods should be prospectively investigated and integrated into training programs.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.

BACKGROUND: Accurate nonoperative diagnosis of proximal biliary strictures (PBSs) is often difficult. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of PBSs following negative or unsuccessful results with brush cytology during ERCP. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single, tertiary referral hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana. PATIENTS: Consecutive subjects from January 2001 to November 2004 who underwent EUS-FNA of a PBS documented by ERCP. INTERVENTIONS: EUS-FNA of PBS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of EUS-FNA, with the final diagnosis determined by surgical pathology study or the results of EUS-FNA and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 291 biliary strictures undergoing EUS were identified. Of these, 26 (9%) had PBSs and 2 were excluded. EUS-FNA was not attempted in 1 because no mass was visualized. The second had a PBS seen on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, but no ERCP was performed. Twenty-four patients (14 men; mean age, 68 years) underwent EUS-FNA of a PBS following ERCP brush cytology studies that were either negative/nondiagnostic (20) or unable to be performed (4). EUS visualized a mass in 23 (96%) patients, including 13 in whom previous imaging detected no lesion. EUS-FNA (median, 4 passes; range, 1-11) demonstrated malignancy in 17 of 24 (71%) patients with findings showing adenocarcinoma (15), lymphoma (2), atypical cytology (3), or benign cells (4). No complications were noted. Pathology results from 8 of 24 (33%) patients who underwent surgery showed hilar cholangiocarcinoma (6), gallbladder cancer (1), and a benign, inflammatory stricture (1). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54%-92%), 100% (95% CI, 15%-100%), 100% (95% CI, 83%-100%), 29% (95% CI, 4%-71%), and 79% (95% CI, 58%-93%), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Histopathologic correlation of EUS-FNA findings was limited to 8 of 24 (33%) patients who underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is a sensitive method for the diagnosis of PBSs following negative results or unsuccessful ERCP brush cytology. The low negative predictive value does not permit reliable exclusion of malignancy following a negative biopsy.

Adult↗

ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients.

BACKGROUND: Biliary disease frequently occurs in the elderly, but there are limited data on ERCP in the elderly population. PATIENTS: A total of 502 patients (group A, 97; group B, 405) underwent 724 ERCP procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All consecutive ERCPs performed between 2000 and 2002 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed for patients >/=80 years old (group A) and patients <80 years old (group B) to evaluate endoscopic findings, interventions, complications, and mortality related to complications. RESULTS: The number of important chronic concomitant diseases was significantly higher in the older group (average per patient 1.08 vs 0.57, P < .001). Successful cannulation was achieved in 88% in group A versus 86% in group B, and endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 63.2% versus 51.4%. Periampullary diverticulum was found significantly more often in patients of group A (39.2%) than of group B (14.1%, P < .001). Stents were used in 24.1% of ERCP procedures in group A and in 22.9% in group B. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between group A (6.8%) and group B (5.1%) and in early mortality (1.03% vs 0.25%), respectively. CONCLUSION: ERCP is a safe and effective intervention in the elderly because complication and early mortality rates are comparable to those of younger patients, although comorbidity is significantly higher.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The identification of therapeutic agents that can prevent the pancreatic injury after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is of considerable importance. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis including 28 clinical trials on the use of somatostatin (12 studies), octreotide (10 studies), and gabexate mesilate (6 studies) after ERCP. Outcome measures evaluated were the incidence of acute pancreatitis, hyperamylasemia, and pancreatic pain. Three analyses were run separately: for all available studies, for randomized trials only, and for only those studies published as complete reports. RESULTS: When all available studies were analyzed, somatostatin and gabexate mesilate were significantly associated with improvements in all three outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) for gabexate mesilate were 0.27 (95% CI [0.13, 0. 57], p = 0.001) for acute pancreatitis, 0.66 (95% CI [0.48, -0.89], p = 0.007) for hyperamylasemia, and 0.33 (95% CI [0.18, 0.58], p = 0. 0005) for post-procedural pain. Somatostatin reduced acute pancreatitis (OR 0.38: 95% CI [0.22, 0.65], p < 0.001), pain (OR 0. 24: 95% CI [0.14, 0.42], p < 0.001), and hyperamylasemia (OR 0.65: 95% CI [0.48, 0.90], p = 0.008). Octreotide was associated only with a reduced risk of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (OR 0.51: 95% CI [0.31, 0.83], p = 0.007) but had no effect on acute pancreatitis and pain. The statistical significance of data did not change after analyzing randomized trials only or studies published as complete reports. For each considered outcome, the publication bias assessment and the number of patients that need to be treated to prevent one adverse effect were, respectively, higher and lower for somatostatin than for gabexate mesilate. CONCLUSIONS: The pancreatic injury after ERCP can be prevented with the administration of either somatostatin or gabexate mesilate, but the former agent is more cost-effective. Additional studies comparing the efficacy of short-term infusion of somatostatin versus gabexate mesilate in patients at high risk for post-ERCP complications seem warranted.

Acute Disease↗

Safety and efficacy of ERCP in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis during pregnancy increases the risk of morbidity and mortality for both fetus and mother because of cholangitis and pancreatitis. ERCP has been advocated as safe and effective in pregnant women, but fetal radiation exposure is not routinely monitored. The aim of this study was to record fetal exposure to ionizing radiation during ERCP and to assess outcome. METHODS: Seventeen ERCPs were performed in pregnant women between January 1995 and August 2003. Techniques to minimize fluoroscopy were used, and fluoroscopy times were recorded. Thermoluminescent dosimeters affixed to the skin of the mother were used to estimate fetal radiation exposure. OBSERVATIONS: Mean gestational age was 18.6 (8.9) weeks (range 5-33 weeks). Mean fluoroscopy time was 14 (13) seconds (range 1-48 seconds). Estimated fetal radiation exposure was 40 (46) mrad (range 1-180 mrad). There was a correlation between fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure, but there was a wide range of radiation exposure for individual fluoroscopy times. Complications included post-sphincterotomy bleeding in one patient (controlled by hemoclip placement) and post-ERCP pancreatitis in one patient that necessitated 3 days of hospitalization. Two women developed third-trimester preeclampsia, and labor was induced in both. Thirteen of the 15 patients who delivered were contacted and they confirmed that their child was in good health. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP with modified techniques is safe during pregnancy. Dosimetry should be routinely recorded.

Adolescent↗