Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Can screening for IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori be used in clinical practice? Omit endoscopy in seropositive or seronegative patients?

The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of a screening strategy for IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori in patients presenting with upper abdominal complaints. Biopsy specimens were taken for histological and microbiological investigations from consecutive patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In addition, a serum sample was taken for detection of IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori, using an ELISA technique. Serum samples from 1294 consecutive patients were available. IgG antibodies against Helicobacter pylori were present in 622 patients (48%), the remaining 671 (52%) were negative. If endoscopy had been omitted in seronegative patients below the age of 45 years, this would have resulted in 234 patients not endoscoped. However, it can be assumed that 62 of these patients would undergo endoscopy because of recurrent complaints due to underlying disease or abnormality. Therefore 182 of 1294 (14%) of endoscopies would have been avoided. Application of this strategy on the total group of seronegatives would save 353 of 1294 (27.3%) endoscopies. If endoscopy had been omitted in seropositive cases below the age of 45 years, and these patients were treated with anti-Helicobacter therapy, an initial 145 endoscopies would have been avoided. However, 26 of these patients would undergo endoscopy because of persistent complaints due to underlying disease. Therefore 119 (9%) endoscopies would have been avoided. Applying this strategy in the total group of seropositives would have saved 434 of 1294 endoscopies (34%). Applying the IgG screening strategy in all patients would result in a significant number of endoscopies being avoided in the seropositive group, 434 versus 353 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, omitting endoscopy in seropositive cases, regardless of age, can reduce the workload more than omitting endoscopy in seronegative cases: 34% fewer endoscopies versus 27%.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Enhanced magnification endoscopy: a new technique to identify specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is not identifiable by standard endoscopy. Acetic acid instillation enhances the ability to detect columnar epithelium at the squamocolumnar union. Enhanced magnification endoscopy involves the combined use of magnification endoscopy with acetic acid. This study assessed the value of enhanced magnification endoscopy in detecting SIM in patients with BE. METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance because of short segment BE without dysplasia underwent enhanced magnification endoscopy with 1.5% acetic acid instillation. Standard endoscopy was followed by magnification endoscopy and repeated after acetic acid spraying. Surface patterns were characterized prior to and after acetic acid spraying. The observed surface patterns were compared with histology results. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients, 9 women and 39 men, with a mean age of 50.5 years were studied. One was excluded because of unclear definition of the surface pattern. Enhanced magnification endoscopy detected 4 different mucosal surface patterns: I, round pits; II, reticular; III, villous; and IV, ridged. A total of 129 areas were examined. Standard endoscopy identified an endoscopic pattern in 1.5% of the areas, standard endoscopy and acetic acid in 8.5%, magnification endoscopy alone in 38%, and enhanced magnification endoscopy in all 129 endoscopic areas. The yields for detecting SIM according to endoscopic patterns were as follows: pattern I, 0%; II, 11% (odds ratio 0.5, p = 0.54); III, 87% (odds ratio 36, p = 0.001); and IV, 100% (odds ratio 14, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced magnification endoscopy is an accurate method of predicting SIM in BE. The simplicity of the technique and its ability to identify characteristic endoscopic patterns with outstanding clarity and resolution that correlate with histologic identification of specialized intestinal metaplasia make enhanced magnification endoscopy an excellent method for the evaluation of patients with BE.

Acetic Acid↗
PubMed1999

Nitrous oxide sedation in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The ideal medication to administer to children before gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures has yet to be found. The efficacy of using inhaled nitrous oxide during endoscopy in children was assessed in a pilot study. METHODS: Patients aged 5 to 17 years, referred to our hospital for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or rectosigmoidoscopy procedures, were eligible for enrollment in this study. All received 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (Entonox; AGA, Rueil-Malmaison, France) before endoscopy and some of them again during endoscopy. The pediatric endoscopist and the nurse performing the procedure were separately asked to rate cooperation, emotional state, drowsiness and overall efficacy of sedation. Oxygen saturation and adverse effects were recorded throughout the procedure. After endoscopy, children scored their degree of pain during the procedures on a visual analog scale (0, no pain; 100, agony) and on a body outline (projective method). Any adverse effects were noted. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty patients underwent diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and seven diagnostic rectosigmoidoscopy. The median time from administration of nitrous oxide until insertion of the endoscope was 5 minutes (range, 3-8 minutes). Good or excellent efficacy of the sedation was noted in 92% of children by the endoscopist and in 89% by the nurses. Good or excellent cooperation was noted in 92% of the children by the endoscopist and in 78% by the nurses. The children's pain score on the visual analog scale ranged from 5 to 100 (median, 20) for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and from 0 to 30 (median, 0) for rectosigmoidoscopy. The time of discharge after endoscopy, defined as the time elapsed between the end of the endoscopy and discharge from the endoscopy suite, varied from 1 to 7 minutes (median, 1.5 minutes). CONCLUSION: Entonox provides rapid and effective analgesia without heavy sedation, leads to adequate relaxation and cooperation, and facilitates quick and efficient endoscopy. The effect of Entonox was of short duration, allowing the children to leave the endoscopy unit without need for a long recovery period. The adverse effects of Entonox appeared to be minor, and their duration was always brief. Nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation may provide a valuable alternative to conventional sedation regimens during gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, but randomized and prospective studies comparing nitrous oxide sedation and conventional sedation regimens are necessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The impact of upper GI endoscopy referral volume on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications: a 1-year cross-sectional study in a referral area with 260,000 inhabitants.

OBJECTIVES: Less than half of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have endoscopic erosive esophagitis (endoscopy positive GERD). Symptomatic GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE), however, are risk factors for esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence of GERD-related findings on endoscopy according to the volume of referrals to upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: The following data were gathered on all GERD patients who were sent for upper GI endoscopy by general practitioners (GPs) during 1 yr in our hospital referral area of 260,000 inhabitants: the number of referrals to endoscopy in health care units, and the numbers of endoscopy positive GERD, BE, and esophageal neoplasms. Patients with symptoms or signs suggesting acute upper GI bleeding and those attending follow-up endoscopy (e.g., for BE, peptic ulcer, or dysplasia) were excluded, as were patients with previous esophagogastric surgery or Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3378 patients, with a mean age of 58.1 yr (95% CI = 57.5-58.6) and a male:female ratio of 1:1.3. Of the 760 patients who underwent endoscopy because of heartburn or regurgitation, 254 (33.4%) had endoscopy positive (erosive) GERD, 11 (1.4%) BE (one with esophageal adenocarcinoma), six (0.8%) esophageal ulcer, and one peptic esophageal stricture (0.1%). Between health care units, the referrals to endoscopy (number of endoscopies/population/yr) varied from 0.6 to 9.2/1000 inhabitants/yr (median 3.3/1000/yr). In health care units with "high" referral volumes (> or = 3.3 referrals/1000/yr, N = 15, 1297 patients) and "low" referral volumes (< 3.3/1000/yr, N = 15, 2081 patients), the numbers of endoscopy positive GERD were 281 (21.7%) versus 308 (14.9%, p < 0.001), esophageal ulcer 13 (1.0%) versus 14 (0.7%, p = 0.3), esophageal stricture five (0.4%) versus seven (0.3%, p = 0.4), Barrett's esophagus eight (0.6%) versus 16 (0.8%, p = 0.6), and esophageal neoplasm two (0.2%) versus six (0.3%, p = 0.2). Five of the neoplasms were squamous cell carcinomas, two were adenocarcinomas, and one was lymphoma. Multivariate analyses showed that independent risk factors for endoscopy positive GERD were male sex (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7), GERD symptoms (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.7-4.0), dysphagia (OR = 1.4,95% CI = 1.0-2.1), and living in a high referral area (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7). Independent risk factors for BE were male sex (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1) and GERD symptoms (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.6), whereas the only independent risk factor for esophageal neoplasm was dysphagia (OR = 40.0 (95% CI = 7.7-207.5). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in GPs' referrals for endoscopy. Increasing the referral volume significantly increases the proportion of endoscopy positive GERD cases, but not that of GERD complications such as BE, esophageal ulcer, peptic stricture, or esophageal neoplasms.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Mucocutaneous exposure to body fluids during digestive endoscopy: the need for universal precautions.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy personnel are at high risk of exposure to infectious body fluids during endoscopy. There are no studies documenting the frequency of such exposure. AIM: To determine the frequency of exposure to body fluids, and factors that may modify the risk of exposure during digestive endoscopy. METHODS: During a 10-month period, 948 endoscopy procedures done by two endoscopists were assessed for the occurrence of splashes to uncovered parts of the body. Odds ratio was used to determine any change in the exposure risk with different risk factors. RESULTS: The overall frequency of splash to any part of the body was 13.2% (95% CI 10.8-15.9). Common sites of exposure were the eyes, face, forearms and feet. Splash to the skin of the face, forearms and feet occurred in 9.5% (95% CI 7.5-11.8). The risk remained unchanged during therapeutic endoscopy, assisted endoscopy, or endoscopy with biopsy or cytology. Using video endoscopy led to significant reduction in splashes on the skin. Overall splash rate to the eyes was 4.1% (95% CI 2.9-5.6). This remained unchanged during therapeutic endoscopy, assisted endoscopy, and endoscopic biopsy or cytology sampling. The risk was not reduced during video endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy results in muco-cutaneous exposure to potentially infectious body fluids in 13% or more procedures. The risk of exposure is not reduced by video endoscopy, or by avoiding instrumentation of the biopsy channel. We recommend that all endoscopists and endoscopy assistants must follow universal precautions.

Body Fluids↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of a new referral system for the management of dyspepsia in Hong Kong: role of open-access upper endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: In the management of dyspepsia, upper endoscopy is an important component. In our locality, patients requiring upper endoscopy are conventionally referred to specialist clinics by family physicians. We have introduced the first open-access upper endoscopy service in Hong Kong, which has allowed family physicians to arrange endoscopy without prior specialist consultation. A study on the outcome of open-access upper endoscopy in contrast with the conventional referral system was conducted. METHODS: For patients presenting with dyspepsia, family physicians in our region were given the option to arrange upper endoscopy directly with our Medical Endoscopy Unit in addition to the conventional referral to specialist clinics. The results were compared with those from the specialist clinic. A detailed prospective follow up was performed from June to September 1997 to evaluate the outcome and impact of open-access upper endoscopy. RESULTS: From November 1996 to September 1999, 978 referrals for open-access upper endoscopy were received. The service significantly reduced the waiting time for the procedure by 16 weeks. Open-access upper endoscopy had similar detection rates for peptic ulcers and cancers compared with referrals from specialist clinics. Seventy-five percent of patients did not require further consultation with their family physicians within 2 months after endoscopy. It is a safe and effective procedure in establishing a definitive diagnosis. All family physicians were satisfied with the open-access upper endoscopy service. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Asian report on this service. Open-access upper endoscopy reduced waiting time from the patient perspective, decreased subsequent consultations with family physicians and reduced referral to specialist clinics as well as increased patient and doctor satisfaction. Both referral systems for endoscopy were similar in terms of the diagnostic yield.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗
PubMed2002

Predicting which patients can undergo upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation.

BACKGROUND: Eliminating conscious sedation for diagnostic endoscopy may be advantageous for patient safety and cost containment. The aim of this study was to identify and validate independent predictors of a comfortable, technically adequate, unsedated diagnostic upper endoscopy in Canadian patients. METHODS: Patients were consecutively enrolled in a prospective fashion. Data collected on an initial cohort of 268 patients included demographics, a validated anxiety questionnaire, use of sedatives/analgesics, upper endoscopy experience, pharyngeal sensitivity, technical adequacy, and patient assessment of comfort after the procedure. The main outcome measure was "satisfactory upper endoscopy," a composite of optimal scores for patient comfort and technical adequacy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the optimal predictive model of a satisfactory unsedated diagnostic upper endoscopy. Once identified, 68 additional patients were enrolled in a similar fashion from an independent prospective sample for purposes of outcome validation. Multivariate analysis was then repeated with the total cohort (N = 336). These results were then compared for concordance with those obtained from the initial cohort. RESULTS: Among the initial 268 patients (54.3% women; mean age 51 +/- 17 years), 49% were anxious, 15% regularly used sedatives and analgesics, 28% experienced increased pharyngeal sensitivity, and 41% had previously undergone upper endoscopy. Endoscopy was completed in 94.7% of patients without sedation and was technically adequate in 97%, and 80.1% were willing to repeat the procedure under similar conditions. Satisfactory upper endoscopy was achieved in only 59% of the initial cohort. The only independent and significant predictors of a satisfactory upper endoscopy were advancing age (OR 1.2: 95% CI [1.1, 1.4]) and decreased pharyngeal sensitivity (OR 0.5: 95% CI [0.27, 0.93]). Concordance of results were noted after validation with the second cohort. Satisfactory endoscopy was achieved in only 59.5% of the total cohort (n = 336); only 61% reported a comfortable procedural experience. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients who can comfortably undergo technically adequate unsedated upper endoscopy is modest. Unsedated upper endoscopy is most likely to be successful under these procedural conditions in patients of advancing age with decreased pharyngeal sensitivity. The generalizability of these findings to an American population requires further study and may assist in identifying a subgroup of patients in whom it is cost-effective to perform upper endoscopy comfortably without sedation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Urgent vs. elective endoscopy for acute non-variceal upper-GI bleeding: an effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND: Urgent endoscopy in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding identifies many patients who may be safely treated without hospitalization. The aim of this multicenter trial was to determine whether urgent endoscopy effectively decreases health care resource utilization in a real-life setting where primary care providers determine the course of care. METHODS: Ninety-three outpatients with acute upper-GI bleeding were randomized to either urgent endoscopy (before hospitalization) or elective endoscopy after admission. The results of urgent endoscopy and a recommendation regarding patient disposition were provided to the attending physician. Medical outcomes and resource utilization were measured. RESULTS: The timing of endoscopy did not affect resource utilization or patient outcomes. Length of stay was similar (urgent endoscopy, OR 3.98 days: 95% CI[2.84, 5.11] vs. elective endoscopy, OR 3.26 days: 95% CI[2.32, 4.21], p=0.45). The mean number of days in an intensive care unit was the same (1.2 days). The urgent endoscopy group had more high-risk endoscopic lesions (15 vs. 9; p=0.031). Outpatient care was recommended for 19 patients (40%). Only 4 patients were discharged. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent endoscopy did not reduce hospitalization or resource utilization because the results of early endoscopy did not impact the decision by attending physicians regarding admission. For early (triage) endoscopy to impact resource utilization, the results of endoscopy must change subsequent patient care.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Screening for Helicobacter pylori in young dyspeptic patients referred for investigation--endoscopy for those who test negative.

BACKGROUND: Studies in young dyspeptic patients have suggested that screening strategies based on non-invasive H. pylori testing can reduce endoscopy workload by 25-40%. Such strategies usually propose that only H. pylori-positive individuals should undergo endoscopy. This approach may fail to diagnose idiopathic ulcers, ulcers in patients whose screening test is falsely negative and reflux disease. AIM: To investigate a hypothetical screening strategy in which endoscopy is initially performed only in H. pylori-negative dyspeptics. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients under 45 years of age undergoing investigation for 'ulcer-like' dyspepsia had invasive and non-invasive determination of H. pylori status. Individuals found to be H. pylori-positive at endoscopy received 1 week of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy. H. pylori-negative individuals received therapy tailored to their diagnosis. Endoscopy was repeated in the positive group to confirm successful eradication. Results were analysed according to our strategy, i.e. serologically-positive patients would have received eradication therapy without endoscopy, but patients found to be negative would have been referred for endoscopy. RESULTS: According to the serology test there were 39 positive and 33 negative results. Symptoms failed to resolve during follow-up in nine of the serological positives despite successful eradication. There were also five false positives who were deemed likely treatment failures. Thus according to our strategy, these 14 serologically-positive patients would ultimately have required an endoscopy and the other 25 serologically-positive patients would have avoided an endoscopy, resulting in a 35% reduction in endoscopy usage in this population. In the serologically-negative group there were three cases of peptic ulcer disease where the test was falsely negative, but they were detected by the strategy. No cases of gastric malignancy were detected at endoscopy. Thus our strategy would have reduced initial endoscopy referrals by 35% in this selected population. CONCLUSION: A strategy of empirical H. pylori eradication therapy can safely reduce the requirement for endoscopy in young dyspeptic patients without sinister symptoms.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Resident education in surgical endoscopy.

Under the auspices of the Resident Education Committee of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, 158 of 298 (53%) of surgical training program directors responded to a survey on the current status of endoscopy in residency programs. Although 100 per cent claim that gastrointestinal endoscopy is provided by their program, only 76 per cent have formal endoscopy training, usually centered around the PGY 3 level, with only 23 per cent having didactic lectures in endoscopy. Directors claim to have trained nearly all of their residents by the completion of residency, averaging 44 esophagogastroscopies, 37 colonoscopies, and 46 flexible sigmoidoscopies per resident. However, they feel only 71 per cent of trainees are able to perform esophagogastroscopies and 67 per cent to perform colonoscopies in clinical practice. Ninety-seven per cent of directors feel endoscopy is important to surgical residency training, and 87 per cent have full-time faculty doing endoscopy. Only 44 per cent have a director of endoscopy; endoscopy is supervised by surgeons exclusively in only 48 per cent. Only 35 per cent have ongoing endoscopy research. When surgeons are not performing endoscopy, 66 per cent feel that the gastrointestinal (GI) service provides adequate service or training. Gastroenterology has a monopoly in endoscopy at 28 per cent of institutions, and 67 per cent of program directors feel there would be resistance to the formation of a separate surgical endoscopy service. Surgeons work in their own surgical endoscopy suite in only 15 per cent of institutions; in a GI suite in 13 per cent; and in a combined suite in the remainder.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1983

The creation of a surgical endoscopy training program--is there sufficient clinical material?

The American Board of Surgery now requires surgical training programs to provide instruction in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to demonstrate that an independent Surgical Endoscopy Service could generate sufficient patient volume for an endoscopy training program, we reviewed our experience before and after the organization of such a service. In the year before formation of the Surgical Endoscopy Service (1981), surgical endoscopists performed 134 upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopies and 25 colonoscopies for a total of 159 procedures. This represented 17% of the total institutional endoscopies performed. Further analysis indicated that 30.5% of UGI endoscopies and 24% of colonoscopies were performed on patients referred from surgical services. During the first year of the Surgical Endoscopy Service (1982), we performed 322 UGI endoscopies and 102 colonoscopies for a total of 424 procedures. This represented an increase to 36.5% of the total institutional endoscopies. During this time 41% of the UGI endoscopies and 33% of the colonoscopies were performed on patients referred from surgical services. Thus, with the formation of a Surgical Endoscopy Service we were able to dramatically increase our procedure volume and to provide effective gastrointestinal endoscopic training for our residency program. This confirmed our premise that in a typical university training program there is sufficient clinical material to provide training in surgical endoscopy.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed1987

Impact of endoscopy on mortality from occult cancer in radiographically benign gastric ulcers. A probability analysis model.

Endoscopy is commonly used in the management of patients with radiographically benign gastric ulcers to detect occult malignancy. Clinical studies examining the cost-effectiveness of using endoscopy in such patients, however, have not been done. To address this issue using probability analysis, a probability tree was designed incorporating the possible clinical courses of patients with radiographically benign gastric ulcers managed with and without endoscopy, and probability estimates for each course were derived by compiling data from the literature. Probability and sensitivity analysis was used to compare the impact on overall mortality rate and cost-effectiveness of six commonly practiced methods of using endoscopy to manage patients with radiographically benign gastric ulcers: (1) all follow-up by upper gastrointestinal x-ray only; (2) endoscopy for nonhealing ulcers only; (3) endoscopy for all ulcers before medical therapy with all follow-up by upper gastrointestinal x-ray; (4) endoscopy for all ulcers after an initial trial of medical therapy; (5) endoscopy for all ulcers before therapy and for nonhealers; (6) endoscopy before therapy, and all follow-up by endoscopy. This analysis predicts that the greatest decrease in mortality rate occurs when endoscopy is used before medical therapy and for all follow-up, reducing the estimated number of deaths per 1000 patients with radiographically benign gastric ulcers from 36.7 with follow-up by upper gastrointestinal x-ray only to 27.2. However, initial endoscopy with all subsequent follow-up by upper gastrointestinal x-ray increased the overall death rate by only a small amount, to 28.0, and was consistently the most cost-effective method, requiring 116 endoscopies and approximately 60,000 diagnostic dollars per additional 5-yr survivor.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1998

The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the impact of endoscopy on the subsequent management of patients with uncomplicated reflux symptoms. METHODS: A total of 742 patients underwent endoscopy for symptoms of GERD. Endoscopists recorded the therapy before endoscopy, the findings of endoscopy, and the treatment recommendations after endoscopy. RESULTS: There was no difference in pre-endoscopy therapy or grade of esophagitis in subjects undergoing endoscopy for failed therapy versus GERD symptoms alone. After endoscopy, the most common strategy for patients taking omeprazole was to maintain or increase the dose. For those taking an H2 blocker before endoscopy, the most common outcome was to switch the patient to omeprazole, independent of the grade of esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients undergoing endoscopy for symptoms of GERD were switched to omeprazole regardless of the endoscopic findings. No esophageal cancer was identified and the incidence of Barrett's esophagus was low. It appears that endoscopy itself did not change the management of patients receiving H2-blocker therapy. A trial of a proton pump inhibitor before endoscopy should be considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of training surgical residents in GI endoscopy has been recognized for years. Despite advice from SAGES and the RRC, few programs have managed to incorporate effective flexible endoscopy training into their curriculum, making it difficult for their graduates to be credentialed in GI endoscopy. Prior to October 2001, our residents obtained their entire clinical experience in the endoscopy unit with staff surgical endoscopists. Attendance was inconsistent because of their many other responsibilities, and residents often used much of their clinical endoscopic exposure gaining basic familiarity with the equipment, precluding the development of therapeutic facility. Since October 2001, we have used the Simbionix endoscopic simulator to supplement resident training in GI endoscopy. With the advent of virtual-reality simulators, and studies validating their effectiveness in teaching fundamental technical skills, we report our initial success in implementing a formal GI endoscopy curriculum using a virtual reality endoscopic simulator to provide basic experience before the clinical endoscopic experience begins. METHODS: Residents are given monthly assignments of simulated cases on the GI Mentor simulator. Junior residents complete the diagnostic case modules; senior residents complete the therapeutic modules. Data were accumulated over the course of two years with a total of five PGY-I and eight senior surgical residents completing assigned cases on the simulator. Objective criteria were measured from their performance on the simulator to determine the efficiency of the examination for each case completed. RESULTS: Preliminary data collected over the course of two years indicates that residents improve the efficiency of their endoscopic examinations over time as measured by objective criteria. Junior surgery residents attained an aggregate average of 59% efficiency in their examinations whereas senior surgical residents who had previous experience with the simulator, attained an aggregate efficiency of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: A formal flexible endoscopy curriculum enhances surgical resident training and positively impacts careers in general and gastrointestinal surgery. Endoscopic simulators allow surgical residents to master the technical aspects of GI endoscopy quickly, thereby permitting them more benefit from their clinical exposure in the endoscopy unit. We anticipate that our formal curriculum in GI endoscopy training will prepare our graduates well for careers that include flexible endoscopy as a component of their clinical practices, and position them to be credentialled in GI endoscopy upon graduation.

Colonoscopy↗
PubMed1995

Hypoxemia during outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: the effects of sedation and supplemental oxygen.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects on oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and ECG changes of endoscopy alone, sedation followed by endoscopy, and sedation followed by endoscopy with supplemental oxygen (O2) during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Outpatient gastroenterology clinic at a university medical center. PATIENTS: 58 healthy patients scheduled for outpatient upper GI endoscopy, with no clinical evidence of respiratory disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to three groups: Group 1 received no benzodiazepines before endoscopy and breathed room air throughout (n = 18), Group 2 received midazolam intravenously (i.v.) before endoscopy and breathed room air throughout (n = 20), and Group 3 received i.v. midazolam and 2 L/min O2 through nasal cannulae during endoscopy (Group 3; n = 20). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collection, which included heart rate, cardiac rhythm, and SpO2 were recorded at seven intervals: baseline, topical anesthesia of the oropharynx, mouth gag insertion, endoscope insertion, biopsy, endoscope removal, and five minutes postendoscopy. In Group 2, mean SpO2 decreased after midazolam was administered and remained depressed during endoscopy (p < 0.05). After midazolam was given, Group 2 patients differed significantly from patients in Groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of hypnotic doses of benzodiazepines is the primary factor responsible for the reduced oxygenation seen during endoscopy. Neither the presence of the endoscope alone nor the use of midazolam with supplemental O2 caused a decreased oxygenation. This study also suggests that the routine use of benzodiazepines is unnecessary when the endoscopy is of short duration, and the endoscopist employs good topicalization of the oropharynx. In patients who require sedation for endoscopy, O2 administration prevents hypoxemia.

Electrocardiography↗
PubMed2006

The importance of process issues as predictors of time to endoscopy in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding using the RUGBE data.

BACKGROUND: Early endoscopy has been shown to improve outcomes and optimize cost-effectiveness in nonvariceal upper-GI bleeding (NVUGIB). However, there is little information regarding clinical and process determinants that affect the time from onset of bleeding to performance of the endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict time to endoscopy in patients with new onset NVUGIB. DESIGN: Linear regression models were constructed with time between triage (outpatients) or onset of bleeding (inpatients) and the performance of endoscopy. SETTING: The RUGBE is a nationwide, multicenter database collected for the purpose of obtaining descriptive data on patients with NVUGIB. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 1500 patients (89.6%) who underwent gastroscopy within 48 hours. RESULTS: Median time to endoscopy was 12 hours (95% CI 11.0, 13.0). Endoscopy after working hours (regression coefficient [beta] -3.52; 95% CI -5.47, -1.58), availability of an endoscopy nurse on-call for the procedure (beta -2.48; 95% CI -3.83, -1.14), and admission to a hospital unit were associated with a shorter interval to endoscopy. In contrast, the presence of chest pain (beta 3.65; 95% CI 1.64, 5.67) or dyspnea (beta 2.79; 95% CI 1.10, 4.48), absence of gross blood on rectal examination (beta 2.20; 95% CI 0.69, 3.71), and inpatient status at onset of bleeding (beta 14.6; 95% CI 8.70, 20.4) were independent predictors of a delayed endoscopy. Subgroup analysis showed that actual time intervals as well as independent predictors of time until endoscopy differed between inpatients and outpatients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of endoscopy in patients with NVUGIB is dependent on both clinical and process parameters, which differ between inpatient and outpatient settings. They bear implications with regards to shaping practice and deciding on resource allocation in order to facilitate an early endoscopy, which is currently recommended for improved patient outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

The effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia: a qualitative systematic review.

PURPOSE: Dyspepsia is a common primary care condition, yet its optimal management is poorly defined. We reviewed the literature to answer the following questions about patients with dyspepsia: 1) Does endoscopy result in improved patient outcomes? 2) Does endoscopy result in a reduction in the use of subsequent medical resources? 3) Does endoscopy result in improved medical decision making? 4) Is endoscopy cost effective? METHODS: We performed a systematic review of English-language articles in the MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, and EMBASE computerized bibliographic databases from January 1985 to July 1998. We included all studies, including decision analyses, with information about the effectiveness of endoscopy, as measured by its impact on patient outcomes, resource utilization, clinical decision making, or cost effectiveness. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from each study, and assessed its methodologic quality. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. For 3 of the 4 clinical questions, the weight of evidence does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy. The largest randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopy with empiric therapy demonstrates equivalent symptoms and quality of life at 1 year, with increased patient satisfaction and lower costs for initial endoscopy. Suboptimal study design, including lack of appropriate comparison groups, limit studies measuring the impact of endoscopy on resource utilization and decision-making. Decision analyses indicate that noninvasive H pylori testing followed by anti-H pylori therapy or empiric antisecretory therapy is more cost effective than initial endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of one randomized clinical trial, the preponderance of available data does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia. Prospective clinical trials that evaluate patient outcomes and resource utilization, and take H pylori status into account, are needed to determine the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia.

Anxiety↗
PubMed2000

Is the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy improved by the use of explicit panel-based appropriateness criteria?

BACKGROUND: Increasing the appropriateness of use of upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is important to improve quality of care while at the same time containing costs. This study explored whether detailed explicit appropriateness criteria significantly improve the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for upper GI endoscopy at 6 centers (1 university hospital, 2 district hospitals, 3 gastroenterology practices) were prospectively included over a 6-month period. After controlling for disease presentation and patient characteristics, the relationship between the appropriateness of upper GI endoscopy, as assessed by explicit Swiss criteria developed by the RAND/UCLA panel method, and the presence of relevant endoscopic lesions was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2088 patients (60% outpatients, 57% men) were included. Analysis was restricted to the 1681 patients referred for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. Forty-six percent of upper GI endoscopies were judged to be appropriate, 15% uncertain, and 39% inappropriate by the explicit criteria. No cancer was found in upper GI endoscopies judged to be inappropriate. Upper GI endoscopies judged appropriate or uncertain yielded significantly more relevant lesions (60%) than did those judged to be inappropriate (37%; odds ratio 2.6: 95% CI [2.2, 3.2]). In multivariate analyses, the diagnostic yield of upper GI endoscopy was significantly influenced by appropriateness, patient gender and age, treatment setting, and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Upper GI endoscopies performed for appropriate indications resulted in detecting significantly more clinically relevant lesions than did those performed for inappropriate indications. In addition, no upper GI endoscopy that resulted in a diagnosis of cancer was judged to be inappropriate. The use of such criteria improves patient selection for upper GI endoscopy and can thus contribute to efforts aimed at enhancing the quality and efficiency of care. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:333-41).

Adult↗