Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Contraindications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Indications and contraindications for breast preservation in patients with breast cancer].

Roughly 70% of all patients with breast cancer can be treated by breast-preserving procedures under optimal circumstances. Risk factors for the development of local recurrences are age, angioinvasion, poor differentiation of the tumor, negative steroid hormone receptors, extensive intraductal component and positive margins. Contraindications for breast preservation are large tumors without remission after preoperative chemotherapy, multicentricity, extensive intraductal component, large ductal carcinoma in situ, inflammatory breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy, Paget disease and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Preoperative needle biopsy allows determination of nearly all of the risk factors. To further increase the rate of breast conservation, preoperative chemotherapy should be used more extensively.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

[Percutaneous vertebroplasty (pv): indications, contraindications, and technique].

PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (pv) is a worldwide increasingly performed interventional therapeutic procedure. This article addresses indications, patient preparation, technical requirements and approach as well as possible complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty. TECHNIQUE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a technique consisting in an injection of bone cement into a vertebral body under imaging guidance. This procedure is performed to relief pain and support the mechanical stability in partially collapsed vertebral bodies. RESULTS: In the management of spinal compression fractures secondary to osteoporosis, myeloma, osteolytic metastases and aggressive hemangiomas, percutaneous vertebroplasty yields analgesic effect, and provides additional fortification in weakened segments of the vertebral column. Contraindications include major bleeding disorders, radicular pain and pain caused by compression of the myelon. DISCUSSION: Percutaneous vertebroplasty results in prompt pain relief and rapid rehabilitation. In experienced hands, using correct technique, pv is a safe and effective procedure for treating pain, caused either by osteoporotic or malignant vertebral compression fractures.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[Sildenafil (Viagra). Tolerance, contraindications, drug interactions].

Placebo-controlled studies have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. It's tolerability cannot yet be judged definitively based on the available information. Some findings indicate that in addition to established contraindications (allergy against the active ingredient, concomitant nitrate and NO-donor treatment, retinitis pigmentosa) factors such as coronary heart disease, advanced age, impaired liver function and drug interactions require special attention by the prescribing physician to secure drug safety.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed1998

Is local intra-arterial fibrinolysis contraindicated in elderly patients with cerebral artery occlusion?

Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) is an effective treatment for selected patients in acute thromboembolic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, vertebrobasilar system or ophthalmic artery. However, the risk/benefit ratio of thrombolysis in patient subgroups requires classification. Advanced age has been regarded as a prognostic factor for poor clinical outcome. We report our experience with LIF in seven patients with a mean age of 79 years (range 76-83 years) who represented thromboembolic occlusion of the basilar, middle cerebral or pericallosal arteries. We discuss why advanced age need not contraindicate LIF.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: CTA evaluation of contraindications.

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients. Its feasibility depends mainly on anatomic factors that represent the important predictors of success and the most important exclusion criteria. Poor anatomic patient selection is generally associated with a higher risk for procedural complications and compromised long-term outcomes. Therefore pretreatment imaging is crucial for evaluating patient suitability for EVAR. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography represents the current standard of reference in the evaluation of the abdominal aorta and iliac axis anatomy because it provides all the details needed for selection of patients who are suitable for endograft and the choice of the appropriate device. This report identifies and reviews computed tomographic angiographic anatomic contraindications for EVAR.

Angiography↗
PubMed2006

Portal hypertension: contraindication to liver surgery?

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades liver resection has become a safe procedure, mainly because of better patient selection. Despite this progress, however, outcomes of hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension are still uncertain. The aim of this study was to elucidate early and long-term outcomes of liver resection in these patients. METHODS: Between 1985 and 2003, a total of 245 cirrhotic patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC. Altogether, 217 patients were eligible for this analysis and were divided into two groups according to the presence of portal hypertension at the time of surgery: 99 patients with portal hypertension and 118 without it. RESULTS: Patients with portal hypertension had worse preoperative liver function (Child-Pugh A class patients: 66.7% vs. 94.9%; P<0.0001). No differences were encountered in terms of intraoperative and pathology data. Operative mortality was similar (11.1% vs. 5.1%; P=0.100), but patients with portal hypertension had higher morbidity (43.4% vs. 30.5%; P=0.049) and received a higher rate of blood and plasma transfusions (51.5% vs. 32.2%, P=0.004; 77.8% vs. 57.6%, P=0.0017). Considering only Child-Pugh A patients, short-term results were similar in the two groups in terms of mortality, morbidity, and transfusion rates. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients without portal hypertension (39.8% vs. 28.9%; P=0.020), although when considering only Child-Pugh A patients no difference of survival was encountered. Multivariate analysis identified Child-Pugh classification, tumor diameter, and vascular invasion as independent predicting factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Portal hypertension should not be considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients. Child-Pugh A patients with portal hypertension have short- and long-term results similar to patients with normal portal pressure.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Are TIPS stent-grafts a contraindication for future liver transplantation?

Our purpose was to assess the feasibility of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients priorly having undergone transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with an expanded tetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE)-covered endoprosthesis. In 48 patients an e- PTFE-covered endoprosthesis was inserted to treat severe complications of portal hypertension. In 36 patients the endoprosthesis was inserted during TIPS creation (de novo TIPS); in the other 12 patients the endoprosthesis was placed to repermeabilize the previously created, but occluded bare stent (revision TIPS). Eight of them (5 de novo and 3 revision cases) later underwent an OLT. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed from initial admission, through TIPS, the pre-OLT period, and OLT to current postoperative status. Five de novo and 3 revision cases underwent OLT 4-279 days (mean delay: 80.8 days) after TIPS procedure. All OLT's were performed under veno-venous bypass surgery. De visu surgical inspection confirmed correct positioning of the fully patent stent graft, starting in the portal vein and ending at the junction of the hepatic vein to the inferior caval vein. No surgical difficulty was observed during proximal or distal clamping or during resection of the diseased liver. Correctly positioned e-PTFE-covered nitinol endoprostheses do not interfere with a later OLT and may not be considered as a contraindication in patients who need a TIPS as a bridge to OLT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[Indications and contraindications of lacrimal duct balloon dilatation].

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the indications and contraindications for balloon dacryocystoplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: So far 85 patients with severe epiphora because of relative stenosis (n = 47) or occlusion (n = 38) of the nasolacrimal duct have undergone dilation. The success rates were evaluated during the acute phase and the follow-up period of 6-12 months. Treatment failures and recurrence of stenosis were analyzed and compared to the clinical and dacryocystographic indications prior to treatment. RESULTS: A recanalization success rate of 79% was achieved in patients with isolated postsaccal stenoses or short-distance occlusions of the nasolacrimal duct. Patients with additional presaccal and saccal stenoses, filling defects in the duct lumen, or long-distance occlusions had lower initial recanalization rates (66%). Main predictors for recurrent obstructions were active inflammation, filling defects due to calculi, extensive occlusion and post-traumatic lesions. In the absence of these factors 12-month patency rates of 80% were proved. CONCLUSION: Dacryocystoplasty procedures should preferably be performed in patients with circumscribed functional postsaccal stenosis. In these cases a success rate of about 80% is possible. Otherwise the value of the intervention is limited by high failure and recurrence rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Severely disordered esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is the preferred operation for the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of a full fundoplication for patients with esophageal dysmotility is controversial. Although LNF is known to be superior to a partial wrap for patients with weak peristalsis, its efficacy for patients with severe dysmotility is unknown. We hypothesized that LNF is also acceptable for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive patients with severe esophageal dysmotility who underwent an LNF was performed. Severe dysmotility was defined by manometry showing an esophageal amplitude of 30 mmHg or less and/or 70% or more nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions. RESULTS: In this study, 48 patients with severe esophageal dysmotility underwent LNF. All the patients presented with symptoms of GERD, and 19 (39%) had preoperative dysphagia. A total of 10 patients had impaired esophageal body contractions, whereas 32 patients had an abnormal esophageal amplitude, and 6 patients had both. The average abnormal esophageal amplitude was 24.9 +/- 5.2 mmHg (range, 6.0-30 mmHg). The mean percentage of nonperistaltic esophageal body contractions was 79.4% +/- 8.3% (range, 70-100%). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions. Postoperatively, early dysphagia occurred in 35 patients (73%). Five patients were treated with esophageal dilation, which was successful in three cases. One patient required a reoperative fundoplication. Overall, persistent dysphagia was found in two patients (4.2%), including one patient with severe preoperative dysphagia, which improved postoperatively. Abnormal peristalsis and/or distal amplitude improved postoperatively in 12 (80%) of retested patients. There were no cases of Barrett's progression to dysplasia or carcinoma. During an average follow-up period of 25.4 months (range, 1-46 months), eight patients (16%) were receiving antireflux medications, with six of these showing normal esophageal pH study results. CONCLUSION: The LNF procedure provides low rates of reflux recurrence with little long-term postoperative dysphagia experienced by patients with severely disordered esophageal peristalsis. Effective fundoplication improved esophageal motility for most of the patients. A 360 degrees fundoplication should not be contraindicated for patients with severe esophageal dysmotility.

Contraindications↗
PubMed1998

Appendiceal mucocele. Contraindication to laparoscopic appendectomy.

Indications and contraindications to laparoscopic surgery continue to be refined. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is frequently selected by patients and surgeons, and clinical studies show it to be a reasonable alternative. In this case study, laparoscopic surgery was used to resect an appendiceal mucocele caused by a nonperforated mucinous adenocarcinoma. Implants of mucinous tumor were found widely disseminated on peritoneal surfaces at laparotomy 9 months later. As a result of this case study, the authors suggest that when an appendiceal mucinous tumor is encountered at laparoscopy, a special situation requiring totally atraumatic appendectomy is indicated. This clinical situation should be considered an indication for conversion to open appendectomy. All appendiceal tumors, including the most benign-appearing adenomas, can result in diffuse peritoneal implantation. This is the first report of an appendiceal mucinous tumor resected by laparoscopy associated with subsequent diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. This patient presentation reaffirms that dissemination of cancer may be associated with laparoscopic resection of structures containing a malignancy.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2007

Is interstitial pneumonia in patients with collagen diseases a contraindication to lung cancer surgery?

PURPOSE: Lung cancer surgery can be dangerous in patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP) as acute exacerbation of the IP may prove fatal. It remains unclear if patients with collagen diseases (CD), who often suffer from IP, are also at increased risk during lung cancer surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 17 (3.1%) patients with CD among 545 patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer at our institution. RESULTS: Nine patients with rheumatoid arthritis, five with systemic sclerosis, two with Sjögren's disease, and one with systemic lupus erythematosus were enrolled in this study. Eleven patients (65%) were taking corticosteroids at the time of surgery. Fourteen patients underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection, and three patients with pStage IA lung cancer underwent pulmonary wedge resection. Pathologically, 11 (65%) patients had IP with various inflammatory cellular infiltrations, and three (18%) had honeycombing of the lung. Postoperatively, none of the patients suffered acute exacerbation of their IP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of IP in patients with lung cancer and CD, our results suggest that CD is not a contraindication to the surgical resection of lung cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

[Therapy refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenia. Contraindication for dental surgery interventions].

Hemorrhagic diathesis represents a high risk for oral surgery. In clinical practice various kinds of diathetic diseases are seen that are of plasmatic, vascular, thrombocytic and hypertensive origin. Usually these patients will be primarily referred to the hospital as high-risk cases. Therefore, a broad spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic interdisciplinary methods are available, so that as a rule it is possible to obtain a clear picture of the severity of the bleeding tendency. We represent a case of a 58-year-old woman who had decayed teeth with chronic periodontal and periapical lesions, who could not be treated by oral surgery because of refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) with 1000 platelets/microliters. The patient's history showed that various hematologic concepts had been tried, including splenectomy, but all had failed entirely. After therapy with steroids, immunosuppressive and cytostatic agents, and even after administering immunoglobulins and substitution with platelets, the count did not increase; thus, an absolute contraindication for all kinds of surgery was declared. This rare example indicates that unmanagable bleeding diseases still exist that should be known by dentists and oral surgeons to prevent making deleterious therapeutic decisions.

Contraindications↗
PubMed2000

Infrainguinal reconstruction in octogenarians: should age be a contraindication?

With the graying of America comes an increasing demand for medical care of the elderly. Unfortunately, due to a combination of rising costs of health care and driving force from the public to lower spending, health maintenance organizations and insurance companies are less willing to pay for expensive surgical procedures. Recently, infrainguinal arterial reconstructions have been denied at our institution solely on the basis of patient's age, without adequate assessment of data. We evaluated the results of patients aged over 80 years who underwent infrainguinal reconstruction and compared them to results of younger cohorts during the same time period. From 1989 to 1998, 629 octogenarians had infrainguinal reconstructions performed at our institution. In the same time period, 3257 procedures were performed on patients <80 years old. Demographics, indications for operations, and outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test and log rank analysis, assuming significance for p < 0.05. Indications for operation were significantly more often limb salvage and less often claudication in the older group. Nonfatal complication rates were similar. Primary and secondary patency rates as well as limb salvage rates were comparable in both groups. Patients who are >80 years of age should expect comparable outcomes to those of their younger cohorts when undergoing infrainguinal reconstructions. Health care dollars can be well spent on octogenarians and age should not be a contraindication for infrainguinal reconstruction.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1992

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist treatment for severe menorrhagia in patients with contraindications to surgery.

Four patients with heavy menorrhagia, severe iron-deficiency anemia and contraindications to surgery were treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in a depot formulation. At 2 months of therapy they were all amenorrheic, and at 6 months the hematologic values had improved markedly. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists may obviate emergency surgery in patients at high surgical risk or could constitute the first line of sequential therapeutic regimens, once general health conditions have improved.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part I. Cardiovascular diseases.

This article reviews the main contraindications of vasoconstrictors in cardiac patients, notably unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, recent coronary artery bypass surgery, refractory arrhythmias, untreated or uncontrolled hypertension, and untreated or uncontrolled congestive heart failure. Extensive survey of the literature has been completed, giving specific guidelines for a rational use of vasoconstrictors in this category of medically compromised patients.

Anesthesia, Dental↗
PubMed1992

Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry: Part III. Pharmacologic interactions.

This article discusses the relative contraindications to the use of vasoconstrictor in patients currently medicated with tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines and beta-blockers. It reviews drug interactions and emphasizes potential detrimental systemic effects that epinephrine contained in local anesthetics can have when administered concomitantly with these drugs. Finally, special considerations are expressed concerning patients who abuse illicit drugs such as cocaine.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Should multicentric disease be an absolute contraindication to the use of breast-conserving therapy?

PURPOSE: Multicentric cancer is present in a large proportion of mastectomies performed as treatment of breast cancer; it has been considered a contraindication to breast conservation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of our patients with Stage I or II breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy over a 13-year period. Twenty-seven patients had two or more nodules of grossly visible cancer separated by histologically normal breast tissue. All patients had grossly negative margins of excision; however, four patients had microscopically positive margins. Nine patients had positive axillary nodes. All patients received radiation therapy to the breast postoperatively, with a median dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions; 11 patients also received a boost dose of 6-20 Gy to the tumor bed. Eleven patients were given adjuvant chemotherapy and one patient was given adjuvant tamoxifen. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 53 months, only one patient has relapsed in the breast (3.7%); that patient relapsed in multiple distant sites at the same time. Three patients have died of disseminated disease; the actuarial survival and disease-free survival rates at 4 years are 89%. CONCLUSION: Breast conservation may be considered for patients with multicentric breast cancer discovered at the time of histologic examination. For patients with multicentric disease detected prior to surgery, breast conserving therapy may be appropriate as long as: (1) all clinically and radiographically apparent abnormalities are removed, (2) clear margins of resection are achieved, and (3) there is no extensive intraductal component.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Olsalazine is contraindicated during pelvic radiation therapy: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: A randomized clinical trial from Great Britain suggested a possible beneficial effect of acetylsalicylate in the prevention of radiation-induced bowel toxicity. Olsalazine is an orally administered drug designed to deliver 5-aminosalicylate to the large bowel with minimal systemic absorption. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of olsalazine in preventing acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to olsalazine 250 mg, two capsules twice daily, or an identical appearing placebo, two capsules twice daily. Patients were then evaluated weekly during radiation therapy for the primary study endpoint, diarrhea, as well as rectal bleeding, abdominal cramping, and tenesmus. RESULTS: The study was closed early, after entry of 58 evaluable patients, when a preliminary analysis showed excessive diarrhea in patients randomized to olsalazine. The incidence and severity of diarrhea were worse in patients randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.0036). Sixty percent of the patients randomized to olsalazine experienced Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea compared to only 14% randomized to placebo. There was also a trend toward higher incidence and greater severity of abdominal cramping in patients who were randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.084). CONCLUSION: Administration of olsalazine during pelvic radiation therapy resulted in an increased incidence and severity of diarrhea. Olsalazine is contraindicated in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy.

Aged↗