Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Colorectal Surgery”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Early feeding after colorectal surgery. Preliminary results.

Thirty three patients were placed under early oral feeding after elective colorectal surgery. There were 15 male and 18 female patients, mean age: 52 years. Nasogastric tube was removed as soon as they were widely awake, or on the morning following the afternoon operations. Oral feeding was resumed 4 hours later, and the first meal consisted in a slight solid meal. There was no postoperative mortality or significant morbidity. Liquid and solid oral intakes were resumed 18 and 24 hours respectively after the operation. Tolerance was perfect in 22 patients (66%), good (slight complaints) in 16%, and was considered as fair or bad in the last six cases. Intestinal transit was observed after a median period of 2 days. Tube insertion rate was 12%. No adverse effect on the anastomoses was noted. Data from the literature confirm that early feeding is tolerable and safe after open colorectal surgery. More patients should be included in this protocol to take benefit of the physiological effects of early oral feeding.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Comparative multicenter study on efficacy and safety of aztreonam and gentamicin in prophylaxis of high-risk colorectal surgery.

The usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of postoperative infections following colorectal surgery has been defined in many clinical studies. Since a single antibiotic agent covering all the potential pathogens (i.e. Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes) is not currently available, a combination therapy is usually administered. The present study reports the preliminary results on comparative efficacy and safety of aztreonam and gentamicin (both combined with clindamycin) as short-term prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Four hundred and fifty-four patients, out of 495 enrolled, were considered evaluable. Incidence of abdominal wound infections was significantly lower in the aztreonam-treated group (5.8% vs 12.5% - p less than or equal to .025). The incidence of perineal wound and abdominal infections, of fever, of need for postoperative antibiotics and the length of postoperative stay were lower in the monobactam group, even if none of these differences were statistically significant. Gram-negative aerobic microorganisms were more often isolated in infected patients from the gentamicin group. Side effects were minor and similar in the two groups. From these preliminary data, the aztreonam-clindamycin combination can be considered a major candidate to replace many of the presently available oral and parenteral regimens.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Mechanical preparation in elective colorectal surgery, a usual practice or a necessity?].

UNLABELLED: Pre-operative preparation of the colon is carried out with oral and/or intravenous administration of antibiotics and through the mechanical preparation of the colon using various substances to decrease the intraluminal bacterial concentration and remove the larger quantity of fecal material as possible, thus decreasing the risk of anastomosis dehiscence due to an increase in the intraluminal pressure. The role of antibiotics has been completely established while that of mechanical preparation is still questioned. The objective of this study is to assess the actual impact of mechanical preparation on colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty seven patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery were prospectively evaluated, out of which only 24 had mechanical preparation. We compared variables such as age, sex, preoperative hemoglobin, albumin and leukocyte values, surgery characteristics and type of anastomosis, as well as complications in both groups. RESULTS: We found a higher incidence of fistulas, dehiscences and general complications in the group undergoing mechanical preparation of the colon. CONCLUSION: The results show that mechanical preparation of the colon does not provide any benefit and may result in a higher incidence of complications in colorectal surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Comparative study of ceftriaxone versus cefazolin plus clindamycin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

A comparative study of 103 consecutive patients who required antibiotic prophylaxis for elective colorectal surgery was carried out. All eligible patients received either ceftriaxone (2 g) as a single intravenous dose at anesthetic induction or cefazolin (1 g) plus clindamycin (0.6g) administered intravenously at anesthetic induction and for two more doses at 8-hourly intervals for a total of 3 days. The incidence of postoperative wound infections was 6.9% in the ceftriaxone group and 11.1% in the cefazolin plus clindamycin group. Single-dose ceftriaxone proved to be a safe and cost-effective form of antibiotic prophylaxis for elective colorectal surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

The pharmacokinetic properties of cefotetan and its relevance for prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

In an open, prospective, non-randomised study involving 112 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, the effect of perioperative prophylaxis with cefotetan was investigated. Cefotetan (2g) was administered, pre- and intra-operatively only. Preoperative bowel preparation was done by the standardised "Würzburg Method" i.e. oral metronidazole pre and post orthograde lavage. Mucosal biopsies were obtained from the resected colon and simultaneously serum samples were taken to determine tissue and serum levels respectively. Antibiotic serum and gut mucosal levels were well in excess of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) levels of the isolated bacteria. Wound infections occurred in only 2 patients. Cefotetan was well tolerated and no adverse events were noted. In prolonged colorectal surgery, an antibiotic such as cefotetan with a long half-life is to be recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Requirement for bowel preparation in colorectal surgery.

To determine whether mechanical bowel preparation influences the incidence of anastomotic dehiscence following colorectal surgery, 186 patients undergoing elective left colonic or rectal resection were randomized before surgery to bowel preparation (n = 89) or no bowel preparation (n = 97). Surgical technique was standardized and no patient had a defunctioning colostomy. Seventeen patients were excluded (seven with preparation, ten without). Indications for surgery in the remaining 169 patients were carcinoma (133 patients), diverticular disease (26), inflammatory bowel disease (six) and miscellaneous conditions (four). Operations performed were left colonic resection or reversal of Hartmann's procedure (26 with preparation, 28 without) and anterior resection (56 versus 59). The overall morbidity rate (18 per cent) was similar in the two groups. All seven clinical anastomotic leaks occurred after low anterior resection, in three of the 39 patients who had undergone bowel preparation and four of the 36 who had not (P > 0.9). Two deaths occurred, both of patients who had received bowel preparation, one being secondary to anastomotic leakage. Bowel preparation does not influence outcome after elective colorectal surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

[Stapled versus hand sewn anastomosis in elective and emergency colorectal surgery].

We studied the incidence of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery with the alternative use of stapled anastomosis, hand sewn anastomosis and stapled/hand sewn anastomosis. 477 consecutive patients admitted for elective or emergency colon surgery were divided in: Group I? 337 elective patients submitted to mechanical bowel preparation; Group II - 140 emergency patients operated without mechanical bowel preparation. We analyzed surgical complications in the two group considering the different anastomosis made (stapled, hand sewn and stapled/hand sewn). Anastomotic leakages were 11 (3.3%) in Group I: 7 in stapled (3,4%), 2 in hand sewn (2,1%) and 2 in stapled/hand sewn anastomosis (5,3%); 10 patients (91%) with peritonitis or intra-abdominal abscess required re-intervention and there was a correlated death. In Group II there were 6 anastomotic leakages (4,2%): 1 in stapled (1,4%), 3 in hand sewn (8,3%) and 2 in stapled/hand sewn anastomosis (5,7%); four patients required re-intervention and there were no correlated deaths. Mean postoperative stays were similar among the different techniques of suture in the two groups. No statistically significant differences in surgical complications were noted among stapled, hand sewn and stapled/hand sewn anastomosis. The choice should be based on personal preference and surgeon experience, considering costs, using hand sewn suture whenever is possible.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of one dose versus three doses of prophylactic antibiotics, and the influence of blood transfusion, on infectious complications in acute and elective colorectal surgery.

In a randomized prospective controlled trial involving 311 patients undergoing acute or elective colorectal surgery, the efficacy and safety of two different single dose and one triple dose regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis, as well as the influence of blood transfusion on postoperative infectious complications, were studied. Postoperative infectious complications occurred in a total of 59 patients (19.0 per cent). There were no major differences between the three treatment groups. Thirty-four patients (10.9 per cent) developed abdominal wound infection, 17 patients (5.5 per cent) intra-abdominal abscess and 16 patients (5.1 per cent) anastomotic leakage. Of 202 patients (65.0 per cent) requiring blood transfusion during hospitalization 57 (28.2 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 23-36 per cent) developed infectious complications, whereas two non-transfused patients (1.8 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits of 0.2 to 6 per cent; P less than 0.001) developed infectious complications. It is concluded that one single dose of antibiotic prophylaxis in acute and elective colorectal surgery is as protective as a triple dose regimen. The development of infectious complications despite antibiotic prophylaxis is strongly related to blood transfusion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Latamoxef: single agent prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

To assess the suitability of latamoxef (moxalactam) as single agent chemoprophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery, 120 consecutive patients were randomized to receive latamoxef (L) 1 g or cephazolin 1 g and metronidazole 500 mg (CM) administered intravenously at induction of anaesthesia and 6 and 12 h postoperatively. The groups were well matched for age, sex, pathology and procedures. Serum and tissue levels of latamoxef were well above the MIC90 for most bowel organisms. Inpatient stay was similar for both groups. Pyrexia was seen in 44 patients (11 L, 23 CM) and eight developed a wound infection (3 L, 5 CM). Major intra-abdominal sepsis occurred in seven patients (2 L, 5 CM), secondary to anastomotic leakage in four (1 L, 3 CM). Twenty patients developed a chest infection (5 L, 15 CM) and eight urinary sepsis (2 L, 6 CM). No bleeding complication occurred, and there was no difference in clotting function between the two groups. Six patients died prior to follow-up at six weeks (1 L, 5 CM), two from anastomotic dehiscence. All but three wounds had healed (1 L, 2 CM) and one further patient had an incisional hernia (CM). These results suggest that latamoxef is an efficient chemoprophylactic agent in elective colorectal surgery, and is marginally better than cephazolin plus metronidazole.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Results and indications of lateral ileostomy functionally terminated in colorectal surgery].

UNLABELLED: Loop ileostomy (LI) ensures fecal diversion to protect an anastomosis or anatomic colorectal or ano-perineal damage. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate loop ileostomy morbidity in emergency and planned colorectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1996, 145 loop ileostomies were performed in 139 patients, 77 men and 62 women with a mean age of 48.7 years (15-82). The etiology was a rectal tumor (cancer or large villous tumor n = 47), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 47, ulcerative colitis = 37 and Crohn's disease = 10) Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (n = 13) and other diseases (n = 32). 80% LI (n = 116) protected ileo-anal anastomoses (n = 46) colo-anal anastomoses (n = 45, 26 with colonic pouch), ileo-rectal anastomoses (n = 11) and other anastomoses (n = 15). 20% LI (n = 29) dysfunctional ano-perineal lesions (n = 8), anastomosis leak (n = 4) or distal bowel without intestinal resection (n = 17). RESULTS: 7 deaths were not stoma-related. 91% LI were closed after a mean diversion time of 3.6 months. LI closure was performed by a parastomal (n = 128) or laparotomy procedure (n = 4). Morbidity during LI diversion was observed in 24 patients (16.5%) 12 of whom (8.3%) were operated for small bowel obstruction (n = 6; 4.2%) stoma revision (n = 5; 3.5%) and prolapse (n = 1; 0.7%). 2 patients had peristomal skin excoriations, and 5 patients required readmission for dehydration due to high LI output. Morbidity after LI closure was observed in 12 patients (8.6%) 5 of whom were operated for anastomotic leak (n = 4) or small bowel obstruction (n = 1). Low morbidity and defunctioning efficiency confirm the indications for LI. LI is our first-line stoma in planned or emergency colorectal surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2006

Learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: our first 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent data confirming the oncologic safety of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer as well as its potential benefits will likely motivate more surgeons to perform laparoscopic colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess factors related to the learning curve of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, such as the number of operations performed, the type of procedures, major complications, and oncologic resections. METHODS: We evaluated the data of our first 100 elective laparoscopic colorectal operations performed during a 2 year period and compared the first 50 cases with the following 50. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 66 years and 49% were males. Indications included cancer, polyps, diverticular disease, Crohn's disease, and others, in 50%, 23%, 13%, 7% and 7% respectively. Mean operative time was 170 minutes. One patient died (massive pulmonary embolism). Significant surgical complications occurred in 10 patients (10%). Hospital stay averaged 8 days. Comparison of the first 50 procedures with the next 50 revealed a significant decrease in major surgical complications (20% vs. 0%). Mean operative time decreased from 180 to 160 minutes and hospital stay from 8.6 to 7.2 days. There was no difference in conversion rate and mean number of harvested nodes in both groups. Residents performed 8% of the operations in the first 50 cases compared with 20% in the second 50 cases. Right colectomies had shorter operative times and fewer conversions. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease in major complications after the first 50 laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Adequate oncologic resections may be achieved early in the learning curve. Right colectomies are less difficult to perform and are recommended as initial procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results.

BACKGROUND: The influence of experience on the results of treatment with laparoscopic surgery is indisputable. The establishment of indications and contraindications is relative, and varies depending on the experience of the surgeon. Learning curves have been described for a number of laparoscopic interventions, in particular laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The current prospective multicenter study investigates, among other things, the interrelation between experience and the results of treatment using laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The study makes no pronouncements on the long-term results achieved in patients with colorectal carcinoma who underwent an operation with curative intent, although relevant data were indeed collected. RESULTS: Between August 1, 1995 and February 1, 1999, a total of 1,658 patients were recruited to the prospective multicenter study initiated by the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. To investigate the influence of surgical experience, two groups were formed. Group A comprised all the institutions and surgeons with experience of more than 100 laparoscopic colorectal operations. Group B contained institutions and surgeons with experience of fewer than 100 such interventions. The results of this study clearly show that in Group A, significantly more procedures involving the rectum were performed (26.7% vs 9.5%), and significantly more carcinomas were surgically managed (37.3% vs 17.3%). Despite this significantly higher level of technically difficult procedures in the patient population of group A, which was comparable in terms of age, gender, height, and weight with the patient in group B, the postoperative mortality and morbidity was, with the exception of urinary tract infections, identical between the two groups. Conversion to open surgery was significantly less frequent in group A (4.3% vs 6.9%), and, finally, the duration of the procedures performed by the more experienced surgeons of group A was appreciably shorter than in institutions with a smaller frequency of such operations. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is very demanding, and can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates only by a surgeon with above-average experience with this type of surgery and a large caseload of laparoscopic colorectal procedures. The learning curve for such procedures is appreciably longer than for other laparoscopic operations. With increasing experience, technically more demanding operations, including radical oncologic rectal laparoscopic procedures, can be performed with appreciably reduced operating times and conversion rates, but with no increase in morbidity or mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed all develop a mathematical model for predicting the conversion rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHOD: This descriptive single-center study used routinely collected clinical data from 1,253 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. A two-level hierarchical regression model was used to identify patient, surgeon, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. The model was internally validated and tested using measures of discrimination and calibration. Exclusion criteria for laparoscopic colectomy included a body mass greater than 50, lesion diameter exceeding 15 cm, and multiple prior major laparotomies (exclusive of appendectomy, hysterectomy, and cholecystectomy). RESULTS: The average conversion rate for the study population was 10.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-11.7%). The independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 2.1 per 10 Americans Society of Anesthesiology units increase), (ASA) grade 3 or 4, 1 or 2 (OR, 3.2, 5.8), type of resection (low rectal, left colorectal, right colonic vs small/other bowel procedures; OR, 8.82, 4.76, 2.98), presence of intraoperative abscess (OR, 3.60) or fistula (OR, 4.73), and surgeon seniority (junior vs senior staff OR, 1.56). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.74) and excellent agreement (p = 0.384) between observed and model-predicted conversion rates (range of calibration, 3-32% conversion rate). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic conversion rates are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment for case mix before comparisons are made between or within centers. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) laparoscopic conversion rate model is a simple additive score that can be used in everyday practice to evaluate outcomes for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of concentrations of two doses of clavulanic acid (200 and 400 milligrams) administered with amoxicillin (2,000 milligrams) in tissues of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

The concentrations of clavulanic acid and amoxicillin were determined in sera and different abdominal tissues of 17 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. At the time of induction of anesthesia, patients in group 1 were given 200 mg of clavulanic acid with 2,000 mg of amoxicillin and patients in group 2 received 400 mg of clavulanic acid with 2,000 mg of amoxicillin. In both groups, the initial dose was administered again after 2 h. Blood samples were collected to determine peak and trough antibiotic levels. Serial blood samples were also collected at predetermined periods (opening and closure of the abdominal cavity and surgical anastomosis). Abdominal wall fat, epiploic fat, and colonic wall tissue samples were collected simultaneously. Antibiotic concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Increasing the dose of clavulanic acid to 400 mg resulted in significantly higher peak and trough levels in serum (P < 0.03). Following the injection of 400 mg, mean concentrations of clavulanic acid in the fatty tissues were significantly increased at the time of opening (P < 0.02). The concentrations of clavulanic acid and amoxicillin in fatty tissues were 17 to 52% and 12 to 23% of the levels in sera, respectively. In the colonic wall, the concentrations of clavulanic acid and amoxicillin were 52 to 63% and 49 and 27% of the levels in sera, respectively. In sera, clavulanic acid given at a dose of 200 or 400 mg reached or exceeded the concentrations found to be effective in vitro to reduce the MICs of amoxicillin from the resistant to the susceptible category for 90% of the potential pathogens. In most of the tissues investigated, increased the dose of clavulanic acid to 400 mg resulted in a significantly higher number of samples with concentrations found to be effective in vitro (72 versus 11%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, increasing the dose of clavulanic acid to 400 mg resulted in higher levels in sera and improved penetration into the abdominal tissues in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2006

The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess whether telementoring and telerobotic assistance would improve the range and quality of laparoscopic colorectal surgery being performed by community surgeons. METHODS: We present a series of 18 patients who underwent telementored or telerobotically assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery in two community hospitals between December 2002 and December 2003. Four community surgeons with no formal advanced laparoscopic fellowship were remotely mentored and assisted by an expert surgeon from a tertiary care center. Telementoring was achieved with real-time two-way audio-video communications over bandwidths of 384 kbps-1.2 mbps and included one redo ileocolic resection, two right hemicolectomies, two sigmoid resections, three low anterior resections, one subtotal colectomy, one reversal of a Hartmann operation, and one abdominoperineal resection. A Zeus TS microjoint system (Computer Motion Inc, Santa Barbara CA) was used to provide telepresence for the telerobotically assisted laparoscopic procedures, which included three right hemicolectomies, three sigmoid resections, and one low anterior resection. RESULTS: There were no major intraoperative complications. There were two minor intraoperative complications involving serosal tears of the colon from the robotic graspers. In the telementored cases, there were two postoperative complications requiring reoperation (intra-abdominal bleeding and small bowel obstruction). Two telementored procedures were converted because of the mentee's inability to find the appropriate planes of dissection. One telerobotically assisted procedure was completed laparoscopically by the local surgeon with aid of telementoring because of inadequate robotic arm position. The median length of hospital stay for this series was 4 days. The surgeons considered telementoring useful in all cases (median score 4 out of 5). The use of remote telerobotic assistance was also considered a significant enabling tool. CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring and remote telerobotic assistance are excellent tools for supporting community surgeons and providing patients better access to advanced surgical care.

Abdomen↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The "Mannit-Ceftriaxon" preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Authors report their experiences with evaluating the clinical course of 45 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into three groups, depending on the type and method of preparation to operation. The 140 patients in the first group received according to the "traditional" preparation purgatives, enemas, and mycerine + metronidazole prophylaxis. The preparation of the 160 patients involved in the second group was performed by giving mannit solution (10%) orally 12 hours prior to surgery, and a single dose of 2 g ceftriaxon (Rocephin, Hoffman-La Roche) intravenously 2 hours preoperatively. The preparation for the 150 patients enrolled into the third group was done also by giving mannit solution orally, and for antibiotic prophylaxis 2 g ceftriaxon was given intravenously as in the second group, but an additional 500 mg metronidazole was also given at the same time as the ceftriaxon intravenously. The evaluation of the cases proves, that the mannit + ceftriaxon method warrants satisfactory protection for colorectal surgery, and the necessary time interval is only 12 hours. The rate of septic complications and septic death was higher in the first, traditionally pretreated group, than in the other two. The CTX + metronidazole combination used in the third group was not superior to the administration of ceftriaxon alone.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Clinical value of preoperative mechanical bowel cleansing in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to establish scientific evidence for and clinical results of preoperative mechanical bowel cleansing before elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: Systematic literature searches in electronic databases, conference proceedings, and hand searches of reference lists of previously retrieved literature without any language restrictions were used. Only randomized trials were included. A quality assessment of each retrieved trial was performed. Outcome measures were surgical infections, mortality, and anastomotic dehiscence. Meta-analyses of the selected trials were performed using the Peto odds ratio. RESULTS: The results of each outcome were as follows. 1). Overall anastomotic leakage-six studies: 5.5 percent with cleansing compared with 2.9 percent without cleansing; odds ratio 1.94, 95 percent confidence interval: 1.09 to 3.43 (P = 0.02). 2). Peritonitis-three studies: 5.1 percent with cleansing compared with 2.8 percent without cleansing; odds ratio 1.90, 95 percent confidence interval: 0.78 to 4.64 (not significant). 3). Wound infection-six studies: 7.4 percent with cleansing compared with 5.7 percent without cleansing; odds ratio 1.34, 95 percent confidence interval: 0.85 to 2.13 (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence in the literature for beneficial effects from the use of bowel cleansing before elective colorectal surgery. Cleansing seems to be associated with an increased risk of more anastomotic dehiscence. Further studies stratifying between rectal and colonic surgery are warranted.

Colorectal Surgery↗
PubMed2002

Comparative study between polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution in elective colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pre-operative-post-operative complications and patients' tolerance between sodium phosphate solution (NaP) and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) for elective colorectal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All colorectal cancer patients treated between August 2000 and May 2001 (NaP group) who received two doses of 45 ml NaP solution with a glass of water were compared to all colorectal cancer patients between July 1997 and July 2000 (PEG group) who received 3 liters of PEG-ES. Patient tolerance, post-operative septic complications, and serum sodium and potassium before and after bowel preparation were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty five patients in the NaP group and eighty six patients in the PEG group were included in the study. Age, gender and surgical procedure were well matched. Patient tolerance to NaP was superior to PEG-ES (p=0.044). There was a significant increase in serum sodium levels (p=0.022) and a significant decrease in serum potassium levels in NaP group (p=0.018) without any clinical sequelae. 35 per cent of the patients in the PEG group had wound infection versus only 10 per cent of patients in the NaP group (p=0.021). CONCLUSION: Sodium phosphate solution was safe, rapid, well-tolerated and could be the standard pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

Administration, Oral↗