Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chromosome Fragility”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1983

Frequency of fragile X chromosomes, fra(X), in lymphocytes in relation to blood storage time and culture techniques.

The fra(X) frequencies in metaphases of lymphocytes from seven male patients with X-linked mental retardation and macroorchidism were scored after use of different culture techniques and different times of blood storage. No statistically significant differences were found between the fra(X) rates of lymphocytes grown either in folic acid deficient medium (TC 199) or in medium containing folic acid as well as a folic acid antagonist (methotrexate: MTX, aminopterine: AP). With respect to the effect of the time interval between blood sampling and culture set-up, a statistically significant decrease in the fra(X) frequency was observed in all culture types after 4 or 7 days of blood storage.

Blood Preservation↗
PubMed1996

Direct cloning of DNA sequences from the common fragile site region at chromosome band 3p14.2.

Despite several lines of evidence suggesting that common chromosomal fragile sites are biologically important as hot spots for recombination, their structure remains unknown. We showed previously that the plasmid pSV2neo preferentially integrates into bands containing fragile sites in cells transfected under conditions of fragile site induction. Here we report the isolation and characterization of the DNA sequences from two such independent integrations into 3p14.2, a common fragile site (FRA3B). These FRA3B region sequences were shown to lie within a 1330-kb YAC, 850A6, approximately 350 kb telomeric of the breakpoint of t(3;8), a constitutional rearrangement. The two integration sites are 10 kb apart, but each integration is associated with a deletion. We have constructed a partial genomic contig of the integration sites and deleted regions spanning approximately 85 kb. Analysis of the DNA sequences immediately surrounding the plasmid integrations revealed no known coding sequences or repeat structures resembling the (CGG)n motif characteristic of the rare fragile sites. In addition, by Southern blotting analysis, none of the phage clones isolated from the FRA3B region were found to contain CGG repeats. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of genomic clones from this contig to metaphase cells induced to express breaks demonstrated hybridization adjoining the chromosome breaks, and occasionally the hybridization signal spanned the break. The results imply that breakage occurs at variable positions within a large region (at least on the order of 85 kb). Together, these data suggest that the structure of FRA3B differs from that of rare fragile sites.

Aphidicolin↗
PubMed1987

The fragile site (16)(q22). II. Sister chromatid exchanges.

In the lymphocytes of heterozygous carriers of the rare autosomal fragile site (16)(q22) an exceptionally high frequency of sister chromatid exchanges was demonstrated at the induced fragile site by means of simultaneous berenil and BrdU treatment of the cultures. The rate of sister chromatid exchanges at q22 is also increased in the fragile chromosome 16 by treating the cells with BrdU alone. The possible reasons for the preferential occurrence of induced and spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges at fra (16)(q22) are discussed.

Bromodeoxyuridine↗
PubMed1986

Genetic control over fragile X chromosome expression.

The cytogenetic expression of fragile sites is highly variable. Sites are seen in differing proportions of cells. To determine if part of this variability is genetic, the proportions of lymphocytes manifesting the fragile X were examined in a large cohort of males with the fragile X chromosome. The number of fragile X cells was solely determined by genetic factors: the heritability as determined from the correlation between brothers as well as between cousins was 99.6% and 94.4%, respectively, as compared with 0% in unrelated males with the fragile X. This is consistent with pure genetic determination without any environmental influence over the expression of the fragile X chromosome in males.

Alleles↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The fragile X chromosome and psychiatry].

The importance of X fragile chromosome in mental retardation is outlined. Two male patients with a low IQ are studied. They were brothers and their mother too was non mental retarded cytogenetically X fragile positive.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[Last advances in Fragile X chromosome syndrome].

The Fragile X syndrome is one of the most frequent forms of mental retardation. The responsible mutation is an unstable repetitive sequence. Since the mutation's discovery, the knowledge about the gene, its protein, function, expression, laboratory detection, phenotype-genotype relationship and risk of expansion, has enormously increased. This work pretends to review the recent advances in this syndrome in all its aspects.

CpG Islands↗
PubMed1997

Positions of chromosome 3p14.2 fragile sites (FRA3B) within the FHIT gene.

The FHIT gene spans approximately 1 Mb of DNA at chromosome band 3p14.2, which includes the familial renal cell carcinoma chromosome translocation breakpoint (between FHIT exons 3 and 4), the most frequently expressed human constitutive chromosomal fragile site (FRA3B, telomeric to the t(3;8) translocation), and numerous homozygous deletions in various human cancers, frequently involving FHIT exon 5. The FRA3B has previously been shown to represent more than one specific site, and some specific representatives of FRA3B breaks have been shown to fall in two regions, which we know to be in FHIT introns 4 and intron 5. Because breakage and integration of exogenous DNA in this chromosome region is frequent in aphidicolin-treated somatic cell hybrids, cancer cells, and, presumably, aphidicolin-treated normal lymphocytes that exhibit gaps or breaks, we determined by one- and two color fluorescence in situ hybridization, using cosmids covering specific regions of the FHIT gene, that most of the aphidicolin-induced gaps at FRA3B fall within the FHIT gene, with the highest frequency of gaps falling in intron 5 of the FHIT gene, less than 30 kb telomeric to FHIT exon 5. Gaps also occur in intron 4, where a human papillomavirus 16 integration site has been localized, and in intron 3, where the t(3;8) break point is located. These results suggest that the cancer-specific deletions, which frequently involve introns 4 and 5, originated through breaks in fragile sites.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗
PubMed1989

Reduced expression of aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites in peripheral lymphocyte chromosomes of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The occurrence and frequency of aphidicolin-induced common chromosomal fragile sites were examined in 12 B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) patients (ten males and two females) and three normal individuals. The mononuclear cells separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient were cultured in vitro for 96 hours stimulated by pokeweed mitogen (PWM) in combination with T-leukemia cell conditioned medium or 10% B-cell growth factor. For the final 24 hours the cells were treated with aphidicolin (0.07 microgram/ml). Results indicate that there was a significant reduction in the overall mean frequency of common fragile sites in CLL patients with a wide individual variation. Fragile sites were found to be localized either on a single chromatid or both chromatids, but rarely involved homologous chromosomes. No definite relationship between the frequency of fragile sites and the staging of CLL disease was observed. A significant reduction and variability in the frequency of fragile sites suggest the heterogenous nature of B-CLL and probably a different mechanism of induction of fragile sites in CLL cells compared to controls.

Aphidicolin↗
PubMed1991

Expression of common fragile sites on the X chromosome corresponds with active gene regions.

The expression of common chromosomal fragile sites on human chromosomes has been proposed to be a cytogenetic expression of gene activity. Distinctive patterns of expression of two common fragile sites on the human X chromosome were observed in females. The fragile site at Xp22.31, located in a band region that contains genes which escape X inactivation, was expressed on both X chromosomes. By contrast, the fragile site at Xq22.1, in a region assumed to be subject to X inactivation, was expressed almost exclusively on one X, the active X chromosome. These findings provide evidence that common fragile site expression only occurs in regions with active genes.

Aphidicolin↗