Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Benchmark”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

Assessment of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis using curated RNA-seq-based benchmarks.

Pathway enrichment analysis is a ubiquitous computational biology method to interpret a list of genes (typically derived from the association of large-scale omics data with phenotypes of interest) in terms of higher-level, predefined gene sets that share biological function, chromosomal location, or other common features. Among many tools developed so far, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) stands out as one of the pioneering and most widely used methods. Although originally developed for microarray data, GSEA is nowadays extensively utilized for RNA-seq data analysis. Here, we quantitatively assessed the performance of a variety of GSEA modalities and provide guidance in the practical use of GSEA in RNA-seq experiments. We leveraged harmonized RNA-seq datasets available from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in combination with large, curated pathway collections from the Molecular Signatures Database to obtain cancer-type-specific target pathway lists across multiple cancer types. We carried out a detailed analysis of GSEA performance using both gene-set and phenotype permutations combined with four different choices for the Kolmogorov-Smirnov enrichment statistic. Based on our benchmarks, we conclude that the classic/unweighted gene-set permutation approach offered comparable or better sensitivity-vs-specificity tradeoffs across cancer types compared with other, more complex and computationally intensive permutation methods. Finally, we analyzed other large cohorts for thyroid cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. We utilized a new consensus metric, the Enrichment Evidence Score (EES), which showed a remarkable agreement between pathways identified in TCGA and those from other sources, despite differences in cancer etiology. This finding suggests an EES-based strategy to identify a core set of pathways that may be complemented by an expanded set of pathways for downstream exploratory analysis. This work fills the existing gap in current guidelines and benchmarks for the use of GSEA with RNA-seq data and provides a framework to enable detailed benchmarking of other RNA-seq-based pathway analysis tools.

Humans↗

Total cost minimization control scheme for biological wastewater treatment process and its evaluation based on the COST benchmark process.

This paper proposes a new cost minimisation control scheme for a predenitrification type of biological wastewater treatment process and evaluates the validity of the control scheme based on the benchmark process presented by Copp. The control scheme adopting a hierarchical control structure incorporates lower-level controllers that consist of a set of local dynamic controllers and a higher-level static optimiser that provides the set points of the lower-level controllers based on the total cost index of Vanrolleghem and Gillot. Prior to benchmarking, this paper derives a simplified process model used for the optimiser, which is able to approximate the benchmark process model effectively as well as is simplified sufficiently for faster set point optimisation for on-line purposes. Numerical experiments evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme from various viewpoints including process operational and optimisation viewpoints.

Benchmarking↗

Extension of the IWA/COST simulation benchmark to include expert reasoning for system performance evaluation.

In this paper the development of an extension module to the IWA/COST simulation benchmark to include expert reasoning is presented. This module enables the detection of suitable conditions for the development of settling problems of biological origin (filamentous bulking, foaming and rising sludge) when applying activated sludge control strategies to the simulation benchmark. Firstly, a flow diagram is proposed for each settling problem, and secondly, the outcome of its application is shown. Results of the benchmark for two evaluated control strategies illustrate that, once applied to the simulation outputs, this module provides supplementary criteria for plant performance assessment. Therefore, simulated control strategies can be evaluated in a more realistic framework, and results can be recognised as more realistic and satisfactory from the point of view of operators and real facilities.

Benchmarking↗

Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: comparing semantic benchmarks.

We explored methods of using latent semantic analysis (LSA) to identify reading strategies in students' self-explanations that are collected as part of a Web-based reading trainer. In this study, college students self-explained scientific texts, one sentence at a time. ISA was used to measure the similarity between the self-explanations and semantic benchmarks (groups of words and sentences that together represent reading strategies). Three types of semantic benchmarks were compared: content words, exemplars, and strategies. Discriminant analyses were used to classify global and specific reading strategies using the LSA cosines. All benchmarks contributed to the classification of general reading strategies, but the exemplars did the best in distinguishing subtle semantic differences between reading strategies. Pragmatic and theoretical concerns of using LSA are discussed.

Adult↗

LAMBDA: A Prophage Detection Benchmark for Genomic Language Models.

Transformer-based genomic sequence models represent an emerging frontier in computational biology. Yet, their embeddings have not yet shown the same level of predictive power as natural and protein language models, indicating a gap between current implementations and theoretical promise. Existing benchmarks for DNA language models primarily focus on classifying regulatory elements in eukaryotic genomes, leaving open the fundamental question of whether these models learn sequence-level features across whole genomes. We introduce LAMBDA, a benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate genome language model embeddings through phage-bacteria sequence discrimination across four categories of increasing complexity: probing tasks, fine-tuning assessments, diagnostic tests, and genome-wide prophage detection. Our comprehensive analysis of current genomic language models provides novel insights into the importance of training data quality relative to model size, the need for domain-specific training, and the application of genomic language models for detecting prophage sequences. This benchmark represents a challenging genomic annotation task in the bacterial domain and addresses a key computational problem with direct relevance to microbiology and medicine.

DNA language model↗

Developing benchmarks for prior learning assessment. Part 2: Practitioners.

Part 1 of this article examined a study into the use of benchmarking for prior learning assessment (PLA). This article outlines the benchmarks and practitioner guidelines that emerged from the study. The guidance is based on the benchmarks for practice and is intended to encourage PLA practitioners and adult learners to purposefully apply proven assessment theory to a variety of personal and professional goals and needs, by developing a portfolio. The basic principles and processes necessary for effective, systematic assessment of prior learning are identified and discussed.

Benchmarking↗

Benchmarking best practice in relapse management of multiple sclerosis.

The Midlands multiple sclerosis (MS) nurse group developed a benchmark for relapse management in MS, using the framework outlined in the DoH document Essence of Care (DoH 2001). The authors discuss the benchmarking process and demonstrate how specialist nurses can collaboratively establish best practice and influence the quality of care. The potential benefits of applying the benchmarking process to relapse management are discussed. Good practice for management of patients with relapsing MS has been developed.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

Benchmarking: one of your CEO's favorite tools.

Benchmarking ranked third in an annual survey by Bain & Co., a Boston-based consulting firm, of the top management tools used around the world. Benchmarking is the only tool in the survey that has consistently risen in popularity over the last five years. Bain & Co. says there is a correlation between financial success and the ways tools such as benchmarking are used.

Benchmarking↗

Health systems consortium puts benchmarking online.

Putting benchmarking projects on the Web. A national consortium of health systems is moving its clinical benchmarking projects to the Worldwide Web so members can access data immediately. Find out what's online now and how a typical consortium benchmarking project works.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Benchmarking cardiac catheterization laboratories: the impact of patient age, gender and risk factors on variable costs, device costs, total time and procedural time in 53 catheterization laboratories.

Coronary catheterization laboratories (CCLs) are the cornerstones of the delivery system for many cardiovascular procedures performed in the United States. However, few comprehensive data exist benchmarking physician activities in CCLs. This study benchmarks cost and time data on 82,548 consecutive patient encounters in 53 CCLs for the 18-month period of January 1997 through June 1998. The data are compiled from the OEP program, a relational database developed by Boston Scientific/Scimed (Maple Grove, Minnesota) for use in CCLs. CCL productivity (total time and procedure time) and cost (variable costs and device costs) benchmarks are created for: 1) left heart catheterization; 2) right and left heart catheterization; 3) percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA); 4) atherectomy; and 5) coronary stents. Results show the variable costs (those costs that vary in direct proportion to changes in CCL activities) for the five procedures are: $308, left heart catheterization; $395, right and left heart catheterization; $841, PTCA; $2,768, atherectomy; and $3,186, coronary stent. These variable costs are lower than the typical average costs reported for these procedures because they do not include hospital, laboratory, and physician costs, only the procedure-specific activity-related costs most directly controlled and/or influenced by CCL physicians or administrators. The total time for the left heart catheterization averaged 64 minutes and 84 minutes for the right and left heart catheterization, respectively, and procedural times averaged 25 and 32 minutes, respectively. For the major interventional procedures N PTCA, atherectomy, and coronary stents, total times averages were 102, 135, and 117 minutes, respectively. Procedural times for these procedures averaged between 60 and 65 percent of the total time. The major implications of these findings are discussed and limitations noted.

Age Factors↗

Combined benchmarking of hospital outcomes and utilization.

A strong case is made for developing quantitative benchmarks for hospital outcomes as well as utilization that includes both acute care re-admissions and lengths of stay. A number of hospitals in two distinctly different geographic health care environments [CA and NY] are studied as to the differences in outcomes and utilization for three of the most common high-cost DRGs. Unscheduled hospital readmissions (within 30 days of initial discharge) were employed as outcome indicators because they reflect both the quality of acute care and the need for case management in the post-discharge period. Benchmark targets were established for patients with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, acute MI treated medically, or COPD using scattergrams that showed each hospital's mean acute LOS on the x axis and the re-admission rates on the y axis. "Benchmarks were identified as those points with the lowest values for both indicators, as demonstrated by points that were closest to the intersection of the two axes."

Benchmarking↗

Benchmarking--an approach to efficiency enhancement in planning, construction and operation of wastewater treatment plants.

In the following paper the technique of benchmarking was transferred to the field of wastewater treatment. The method was developed within a pilot project, in which 4 wastewater treatment plants (WVTP) (size category: 10,000-100,000 p. e.) of the Emschergenossenschaft/Lippeverband and the Aggerverband were involved. Meanwhile this method is applied to more than 100 WWTP. Specific technical and economic parameters were determined for the whole treatment plant and afterwards assigned to the different treatment steps. With these numbers differences between the examined plants and the respective benchmarks were visible. On the basis of the following cause analysis a schedule could be developed containing at first measures, which could be translated into action immediately. The less obvious reasons for differences between individual numbers required a deeper cause analysis. Because of external influences not all the plants can reach the benchmarks.

Benchmarking↗

Practice re-engineering through the use of benchmarks: Part 1.

Benchmarking can be a useful tool to assist practices in successfully re-engineering their practices to achieve performance improvement. Unfortunately, although many practices identify benchmarks, they often are not integrated into day-to-day operations or used to create accountability or re-engineer processes. Part 1 of this series describes the nine-step benchmarking process and discusses how to successfully use the process to improve performance through process re-engineering. Part 2 will identify key indicators to measure performance and explain how to integrate their use into the practice's daily operations.

Benchmarking↗

Robustness and economic measures as control benchmark performance criteria.

The objective of this paper was to investigate the usefulness of new multi-criteria measures to evaluate a control strategy through the Benchmark protocol. Using a case study in which respirometry-based control strategies are evaluated, the proposed measures were calculated. An economic index including weighted investment and operating costs (termed Total Cost Index--TCI) appears more powerful than a grey-scale presentation approach. Using the latter approach, it is hard to reflect the relative importance of the criteria investigated, which makes practical decisions rather difficult. In addition, a Robustness Index (RI) is proposed that allows us to evaluate the transferability of control strategies to situations different from the ones defined in the benchmark protocol. Finally, the case study shows that it may be advisable to replace the currently used open loop benchmark reference by a plant in which dissolved oxygen is controlled in all aerated reactors. This quite simple strategy also turned out to be the best one among all evaluated strategies.

Algorithms↗

Control of an activated sludge process with nitrogen removal--a benchmark study.

In this paper, a simulation benchmark of a predenitrifying activated sludge process is used to evaluate a number of control strategies. A main procedure has been to use feedforward terms that are based on simplified physical models. Important mass balance relations may then be incorporated in the control law. The nitrate level in the last anoxic zone is controlled by the dosage of an external carbon source and the nitrate level in the last aerobic zone is controlled by the internal recirculation flow rate. The ammonia level is controlled by a DO set-point controller. In order to be able to have as high a sludge level as possible without sludge escape, the sludge blanket height in the settler is controlled by the excess sludge flow rate. Compared to the default set up of the benchmark, the controllers could reduce the effluent nitrate significantly whereas the effluent ammonia was only marginally decreased. The main problem is that the aeration capacity defined in the benchmark is too low.

Ammonia↗

Benchmarking graduate health administration programs: stakeholders' perceptions.

The purpose of this study was to identify and compare among key stakeholders the factors in graduate health care administration education that are perceived to be important for ranking, or benchmarking, based on the opinions of those stakeholders, i.e., program directors, faculty, graduate students, and accrediting agency commissioners. We used an original survey to obtain stakeholders' perceptions and opinions about important process and outcome measures. We sent it to all ACEHSA-accredited graduate health care administration programs in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico; to full-time faculty members in each program; to three current graduate students in each program, and to all ACEHSA commissioners. We performed frequency of responses, Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) tests, and Dunnett T3 tests. A response rate of 32 percent (n = 156) was achieved for all stakeholders. A total of 67 percent of all respondents reported that benchmarking graduate health care administration programs was important. The study results revealed a significant difference between populations on the importance of evaluating certain process and outcome measures related to curriculum, research, student characteristics, and resources. However, most of the stakeholders reported that curriculum, faculty, and graduate student performance were the key quality indicators of a program. The results of this study provide preliminary information for health care administration programs to begin to develop an educational benchmarking effort.

Accreditation↗

Benchmarking the future generalist workforce.

CONTEXT: Previous workforce analyses by the Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME) have concluded that the United States has too few, or just enough, generalists. However, recent trends suggest that more physicians are entering primary care, raising the possibility of a future surplus. OBJECTIVE: To project the future supply of generalists relative to future requirements. DESIGN: We developed a model that projects the supply of generalists into the future on the basis of the annual number of physicians entering and leaving the workforce. We calculated the number of clinically active generalists from the physician master-files of the American Medical Association and American Osteopathic Association. The number of graduating trainees entering the generalist workforce was calculated from the 1999 to 2000 AMA Annual Survey of GME. The number leaving was calculated by using age- and sex-specific rates or physician death and retirement provided by the Bureau of Health Professions. MEASUREMENTS: Projected per capita number of clinically active generalists to the year 2025, relative to physician requirements suggested by COGME and several regional benchmarks of physician supply. RESULTS: The supply of generalists is projected to grow from its current level of 69 per 100,000 to nearly 88 per 100,000 by the year 2025. Adjusting for the changing age-sex structure of the physician workforce decreases the "effective" supply to 85 generalists per 100,000. By the year 2025, the effective supply of generalists will exceed COGME's upper estimate of generalist requirements (80 per 100,000), resulting in an excess of about 18,000 full-time equivalent generalists. The future supply of generalists will also exceed most current regional benchmarks of generalist supply. CONCLUSION: At current levels of training, the supply of generalists will grow substantially and soon exceed several benchmarks for generalist requirements.

Benchmarking↗

Practice re-engineering through the use of benchmarks: Part II.

Benchmarking can be a useful tool to assist practices in successfully re-engineering their practices to achieve performance improvement. Unfortunately, while many practices identify benchmarks, they are not often integrated into the day-to-day operations of the practice, used to create accountability, or used to help re-engineer processes. Part I described the nine-step benchmarking process and discussed how to use the process successfully to improve performance through process re-engineering. Part II identifies key indicators to measure performance and explains how to integrate their use into the practice's daily operations.

Accounts Payable and Receivable↗