Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACTIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Autoregulation of actin synthesis by physiological alterations of the G-actin level in hepatocytes.

Hypotonic treatment of cultured rat hepatocytes significantly decreased the monomeric G-actin level by 18% after 120 min while the level of filamentous F-actin remained essentially unchanged. Simultaneously the level of cellular actin mRNA was increased by 53%. Incubation of hepatocytes for 120 min with the F-actin stabilizing toxin phalloidin from Amanita phalloides led to a decrease of G-actin by 70% and an increase of F-actin by 55%. Although the toxin dependent decrease of G-actin was much more pronounced than the decrease after hypotonic treatment, the increase of actin mRNA was similar under both conditions. Simultaneous treatment with hypotonic medium did not result in a further decrease of the G-actin level. On the other hand, the G-actin elevating C2 toxin from Clostridium botulinum completely blocked the effects of osmotic stress on G-actin and actin-mRNA content. The results demonstrate that already an essentially physiological decrease of G-actin without alterations of F-actin results in a substantial enhancement of the actin mRNA level, indicating the physiological significance of this autoregulation.

Actins↗
PubMed1989

Change in the actin-myosin subfragment 1 interaction during actin polymerization.

To better characterize the conformational differences of G- and F-actin, we have compared the interaction between G- and F-actin with myosin subfragment 1 (S1) which had part of its F-actin binding site (residues 633-642) blocked by a complementary peptide or "antipeptide" (Chaussepied, P., and Morales, M. F. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 7471-7475). Light scattering, sedimentation, and electron microscopy measurements showed that, with the antipeptide covalently attached to the S1 heavy chain, S1 was not capable of inducing G-actin polymerization in the absence of salt. Moreover, the antipeptide-carrying S1 did not change the fluorescence polarization of 5-[2-(iodoacetyl)-aminoethyl]aminonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (1,5-IAEDANS)-labeled G-actin or of 1,5-IAEDANS-labeled actin dimer, compared to the control S1. This result, interpreted as a lack of interaction between G-actin and antipeptide-carrying S1, was confirmed further by the following experiments: in the presence of G-actin, antipeptide.S1 heavy chain was not protected against trypsin and papain proteolysis, and G-actin could not be cross-linked to antipeptide.S1 by 1-ethyl-3[-3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. In contrast, similar experiments showed that antipeptide.S1 was able to interact with nascent F-actin and with F-actin. Thus, blocking the stretch 633-642 of S1 heavy chain by the antipeptide strongly inhibits G-actin-S1 interaction but only slightly alters F-actin-S1 contact. We, therefore postulate that this stretch of skeletal S1 heavy chain is essential for G-actin-S1 interaction and that the G-F transformation generates new S1 binding site(s) on the actin molecule.

Actins↗
PubMed1989

Differential effect of platelet-derived growth factor- versus serum-induced growth on smooth muscle alpha-actin and nonmuscle beta-actin mRNA expression in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells.

Previous studies have demonstrated that rat aortic smooth muscle cells (SMC) show marked changes in smooth muscle (SM) alpha-actin content and fractional synthesis as a function of cell density and growth (Owens, G. K., Loeb, A., Gordon, D., and Thompson, M. M. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 343-352; Blank, R., Thompson, M. M., and Owens, G. K. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 299-306). Results of this study show that, although there is a 6-fold increase in SM alpha-actin content in postconfluent density arrested cultures as compared to proliferating subconfluent cultures, SM alpha-actin mRNA levels are not different between these cells. This suggests that the SM alpha-actin gene is constitutively active under both of these conditions and that accumulation of SM alpha-actin in postconfluent cells is due to translational and/or post-translational controls. The relationship between growth and cytodifferentiation was further explored by examining the effects of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)- or serum-induced growth on actin expression in postconfluent, quiescent cultures maintained in a defined serum-free media. Although both factors have been shown to stimulate proliferation and decrease fractional SM alpha-actin synthesis (Blank et al., 1988), their effects on actin mRNA levels were quite different. PDGF was found to induce a dramatic drop in SM alpha-actin steady state mRNA level but had no effect on nonmuscle beta-actin mRNA level. In contrast, serum stimulation was shown to increase nonmuscle beta-actin mRNA level, whereas SM alpha-actin mRNA level remained constant. Taken together these results indicate that PDGF is a specific and potent repressor of SM alpha-actin expression in vascular SMC and implicate a possible developmental role for PDGF in control of SMC differentiation. In addition, the observation that the level of SM alpha-actin mRNA is unaltered in serum-stimulated cells indicates that an absolute decrease in SM alpha-actin mRNA is not obligatory for cell cycle entrance.

Actins↗
PubMed1985

Effect of actin filament length and filament number concentration on the actin-activated ATPase activity of Acanthamoeba myosin I.

The actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activities of phosphorylated Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB were previously found to have a highly cooperative dependence on myosin concentration (Albanesi, J. P., Fujisaki, H., and Korn, E. D. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11174-11179). This behavior is reflected in the requirement for a higher concentration of F-actin for half-maximal activation of the myosin Mg2+-ATPase at low ratios of myosin:actin (noncooperative phase) than at high ratios of myosin:actin (cooperative phase). These phenomena could be explained by a model in which each molecule of the nonfilamentous myosins IA and IB contains two F-actin-binding sites of different affinities with binding of the lower affinity site being required for expression of actin-activated ATPase activity. Thus, enzymatic activity would coincide with cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin. This theoretical model predicts that shortening the actin filaments and increasing their number concentration at constant total F-actin should increase the myosin concentration required to obtain the cooperative increase in activity and should decrease the F-actin concentration required to reach half-maximal activity at low myosin:actin ratios. These predictions have been experimentally confirmed by shortening actin filaments by addition of plasma gelsolin, an F-actin capping/severing protein. In addition, we have found that actin "filaments" as short as the 1:2 gelsolin-actin complex can significantly activate Acanthamoeba myosin I.

Actins↗
PubMed1988

Low concentration of reserpine accelerates actin polymerization via interaction with G-actin.

The effect of reserpine on actin polymerization was examined by measurement of the changes in high shear viscosity and by electron microscopic observation of the actin solution. In the presence of low concentrations of reserpine, the time course of actin polymerization was accelerated dose dependently (up to approximately 0.5 nM), without affecting the final level of viscosity. The effect of reserpine rather decreased with dosages over this concentration. The binding of reserpine to actin was tested by developing the mixture of G- or F-actin and [3H]reserpine through a Sephadex G-50 column. A portion of the reserpine coeluted with G-actin, but little reserpine did with F-actin. This means that reserpine bound to G-actin but scarcely to F-actin. The binding of reserpine to G-actin was also confirmed using the method of photoaffinity labeling. After the irradiation of the mixed G-actin and [3H]reserpine by ultraviolet light, they were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography. It was demonstrated that reserpine was bound to G-actin covalently by the ultraviolet light irradiation. This indicated the close interaction of reserpine with G-actin. Thus, the effect of reserpine on actin polymerization seemed to be exerted via interaction with G-actin.

Actins↗
PubMed1980

The effects of cytochalasins on actin polymerization and actin ATPase provide insights into the mechanism of polymerization.

Substoichiometric concentrations of cytochalasin D inhibited the rate of polymerization of actin in 0.5 mM MgCl2, increased its critical concentration and lowered its steady state viscosity. Stoichiometric concentrations of cytochalasin D in 0.5 mM MgCl2 and even substoichiometric concentrations of cytochalasin D in 30 mM KCl, however, accelerated the rate of actin polymerization, although still lowering the final steady state viscosity. Cytochalasin B, at all concentrations in 0.5 mM MgCl2 or in 30 mM KCl, accelerated the rate of polymerization and lowered the final steady state viscosity. In 0.5 mM MgCl2, cytochalasin D uncoupled the actin ATPase activity from actin polymerization, increasing the ATPase rate by at least 20 times while inhibiting polymerization. Cytochalasin B had a very much lower stimulating effect. Neither cytochalasin D nor B affected the actin ATPase activity in 30 mM KCl. The properties of cytochalasin E were intermediate between those of cytochalasin D and B. Cytochalasin D also stimulated the ATPase activity of monomeric actin in the absence of MgCl2 and KCl and, to a much greater extent, stimulated the ATPase activity of monomeric actin below its critical concentration in 0.5 mM MgCl2. Both above and below its critical concentration and in the presence and absence of cytochalasin D, the initial rate of actin ATPase activity, when little or no polymerization had occurred, was directly proportional to the actin concentration and, therefore, apparently was independent of actin-actin interactions. To rationalize all these data, a working model has been proposed in which the first step of actin polymerization is the conversion of monomeric actin-bound ATP, A . ATP, to monomeric actin-bound ADP and Pi, A* . ADP . Pi, which, like the preferred growing end of an actin filament, can bind cytochalasins.

Actins↗
PubMed1997

Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/cofilin) enhances the rate of filament turnover: implication in actin-based motility.

Actin-binding proteins of the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family are thought to control actin-based motile processes. ADF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana appears to be a good model that is functionally similar to other members of the family. The function of ADF in actin dynamics has been examined using a combination of physical-chemical methods and actin-based motility assays, under physiological ionic conditions and at pH 7.8. ADF binds the ADP-bound forms of G- or F-actin with an affinity two orders of magnitude higher than the ATP- or ADP-Pi-bound forms. A major property of ADF is its ability to enhance the in vitro turnover rate (treadmilling) of actin filaments to a value comparable to that observed in vivo in motile lamellipodia. ADF increases the rate of propulsion of Listeria monocytogenes in highly diluted, ADF-limited platelet extracts and shortens the actin tails. These effects are mediated by the participation of ADF in actin filament assembly, which results in a change in the kinetic parameters at the two ends of the actin filament. The kinetic effects of ADF are end specific and cannot be accounted for by filament severing. The main functionally relevant effect is a 25-fold increase in the rate of actin dissociation from the pointed ends, while the rate of dissociation from the barbed ends is unchanged. This large increase in the rate-limiting step of the monomer-polymer cycle at steady state is responsible for the increase in the rate of actin-based motile processes. In conclusion, the function of ADF is not to sequester G-actin. ADF uses ATP hydrolysis in actin assembly to enhance filament dynamics.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1999

Purification and biochemical characterization of actin from Caenorhabditis elegans: its difference from rabbit muscle actin in the interaction with nematode ADF/cofilin.

Biochemical analysis of cytoskeletal proteins of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can be combined with a vast resource of genetic information in order to understand the regulation and function of the cytoskeleton in vivo. Here, I report an improved and efficient method to purify actin from wild-type C. elegans and characterization of its biochemical properties. The purified actin was highly pure and free of several known actin-binding proteins. G-actin was polymerized into F-actin in a similar kinetic process to rabbit muscle actin. G-actin interacted with bovine DNase I and inhibited its activity. However, UNC-60B, an isoform of ADF/cofilin in C. elegans, showed a marked depolymerizing activity on C. elegans actin but not on rabbit muscle actin. The results indicate that C. elegans actin shares common biochemical properties with rabbit muscle actin, while actin-binding proteins can interact with C. elegans actin in a distinct manner from rabbit muscle actin.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗
PubMed1992

Physarum actin is phosphorylated as the actin-fragmin complex at residues Thr203 and Thr202 by a specific 80 kDa kinase.

The Physarum EGTA-resistant actin-fragmin complex, previously named cap 42(a+b), is phosphorylated in the actin subunit by an endogenous kinase [Maruta and Isenberg (1983) J. Biol. Chem., 258, 10151-10158]. This kinase has been purified and characterized. It is an 80 kDa monomeric enzyme, unaffected by known kinase regulators. Staurosporine acts as a potent inhibitor. The actin-fragmin complex is the preferred substrate. The phosphorylation is inhibited by micromolar Ca2+ concentrations, but only in the presence of additional actin. Polymerized actin (vertebrate muscle and non-muscle isoforms) and actin complexes with various actin-binding proteins are poorly phosphorylated. The heterotrimer consisting of two actins and one fragmin, which is formed from cap 42(a+b) and actin in the presence of micromolar concentrations of Ca2+, is also a poor substrate. From the other substrates tested, only histones were significantly phosphorylated, in particular histone H1. In the same manner, casein kinase I could also phosphorylate the actin-fragmin complex. The major phosphorylation site in actin is Thr203. A second minor site is Thr202. These residues constitute one of the contact sites for DNase I [Kabsch et al. (1990) Nature, 347, 37-44] and are also part of one of the predicted actin-actin contact sites in the F-actin model [Holmes et al. (1990) Nature, 347, 44-49].

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2005

Effect of arginine loss in myelin basic protein, as occurs in its deiminated charge isoform, on mediation of actin polymerization and actin binding to a lipid membrane in vitro.

Myelin basic protein (MBP) binds to negatively charged lipids on the cytosolic surface of oligodendrocyte membranes and is most likely responsible for adhesion of these surfaces in the multilayered myelin sheath. It can also polymerize actin, bundle F-actin filaments, and bind actin filaments to lipid bilayers through electrostatic interactions. MBP consists of a number of posttranslationally modified isoforms of varying charge, including C8, in which six arginines are deiminated to the uncharged residue citrulline. The deiminated form decreases with development, but is increased in patients with the demyelinating disease multiple sclerosis. Here we investigate the effect of decreased net positive charge of MBP on its interaction with actin in vitro by comparing a recombinant murine form, rmC1, of the most highly charged unmodified isoform, C1, and a recombinant analogue of C8 in which six basic residues are converted to glutamine, rmC8. The dissociation constant of the less charged isoform rmC8 for actin was a little greater than that of rmC1, and rmC8 had somewhat reduced ability to polymerize actin and bundle F-actin filaments than rmC1. Moreover, rmC8 was more readily dissociated from actin by Ca(2+)-calmodulin than rmC1, and the ability of the deiminated isoform to bind actin to lipid bilayers was reduced. These results indicate that electrostatic forces are the primary determinant of the interaction of MBP with actin. The spin labeled side chains of a series of rmC1 and rmC8 variants containing single Cys substitutions at seven sites throughout the sequence all became motionally restricted to a similar degree on binding F-actin, indicating that the entire sequence is involved in interacting with actin filaments or is otherwise structurally constrained in actin bundles. Thus, this posttranslational modification of MBP, which occurs early in life and is increased in multiple sclerosis, attenuates the ability of MBP to polymerize and bundle actin, and to bind it to a negatively charged membrane.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2006

Actin bodies in yeast quiescent cells: an immediately available actin reserve?

Most eukaryotic cells spend most of their life in a quiescent state, poised to respond to specific signals to proliferate. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, entry into and exit from quiescence are dependent only on the availability of nutrients in the environment. The transition from quiescence to proliferation requires not only drastic metabolic changes but also a complete remodeling of various cellular structures. Here, we describe an actin cytoskeleton organization specific of the yeast quiescent state. When cells cease to divide, actin is reorganized into structures that we named "actin bodies." We show that actin bodies contain F-actin and several actin-binding proteins such as fimbrin and capping protein. Furthermore, by contrast to actin patches or cables, actin bodies are mostly immobile, and we could not detect any actin filament turnover. Finally, we show that upon cells refeeding, actin bodies rapidly disappear and actin cables and patches can be assembled in the absence of de novo protein synthesis. This led us to propose that actin bodies are a reserve of actin that can be immediately mobilized for actin cables and patches formation upon reentry into a proliferation cycle.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2006

Tobacco WLIM1 is a novel F-actin binding protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling.

We used confocal microscopy and in vitro analyses to show that Nicotiana tabacum WLIM1, a LIM domain protein related to animal Cys-rich proteins, is a novel actin binding protein in plants. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged WLIM1 protein accumulated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of tobacco BY2 cells. It associated predominantly with actin cytoskeleton, as demonstrated by colabeling and treatment with actin-depolymerizing latrunculin B. High-speed cosedimentation assays revealed the ability of WLIM1 to bind directly to actin filaments with high affinity. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence loss in photobleaching showed a highly dynamic in vivo interaction of WLIM1-GFP with actin filaments. Expression of WLIM1-GFP in BY2 cells significantly delayed depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton induced by latrunculin B treatment. WLIM1 also stabilized actin filaments in vitro. Importantly, expression of WLIM1-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves induces significant changes in actin cytoskeleton organization, specifically, fewer and thicker actin bundles than in control cells, suggesting that WLIM1 functions as an actin bundling protein. This hypothesis was confirmed by low-speed cosedimentation assays and direct observation of F-actin bundles that formed in vitro in the presence of WLIM1. Taken together, these data identify WLIM1 as a novel actin binding protein that increases actin cytoskeleton stability by promoting bundling of actin filaments.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed1997

Capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by a high-affinity profilin-actin complex.

Profilin, a ubiquitous 12 to 15-kDa protein, serves many functions, including sequestering monomeric actin, accelerating nucleotide exchange on actin monomers, decreasing the critical concentration of the barbed end of actin filaments, and promoting actin polymerization when barbed ends are free. Most previous studies have focused on profilin itself rather than its complex with actin. A high-affinity profilin-actin complex (here called profilactin) can be isolated from a poly-(L)-proline (PLP) column by sequential elution with 3 M and 7 M urea. Profilactin inhibited the elongation rate of pyrenyl-G-actin from filament seeds in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Much greater inhibition of elongation was observed with spectrin-F-actin than gelsolin-F-actin seeds, suggesting that the major effect of profilactin was due to capping the barbed ends of actin filaments. Its dissociation constant for binding to filament ends was 0.3 microM; the on- and off-rate constants were estimated to be 1.7 x 10(3) M-1 s-1 and 4.5 x 10(-4) s-1, respectively. Purified profilin (obtained by repetitive applications to a PLP column and assessed by silver-stained polyacylamide gels) did not slow the elongation rate of pyrenyl-G-actin from filament seeds. Capping protein could not be detected by Western blotting in the profilactin preparation, but low concentrations of gelsolin did contaminate our preparation. However, prolonged incubation with either calcium or EGTA did not affect capping activity, implying that contaminating gelsolin-actin complexes were not primarily responsible for the observed capping activity. Reapplication of the profilactin preparation to PLP-coupled Sepharose removed both profilin and actin and concurrently eliminated its capping activity. Profilactin that was reapplied to uncoupled Sepharose retained its capping activity. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) was the most potent phosphoinositol in reducing the capping activity of profilactin. Dissociation of the tight profilactin complex may serve as a unique mechanism by which profilin helps regulate actin filament growth.

Actins↗
PubMed1991

Binding of alpha-actinin to F-actin or to tropomyosin F-actin is a function of both alpha-actinin concentration and gel structure.

We have studied by electron microscopy as well as by measurements of low shear viscosity, rigidity and binding, the effect of alpha-actinin on the gel formed at 37 degrees C with F-actin and with tropomyosin-decorated F-actin. Contrary to previous reports in the literature, alpha-actinin at nanomolar concentrations is an efficient actin gelling protein, even at 37 degrees C, provided that the concentration of actin (or of tropomyosin-decorated F-actin) is low (1.2-2.4 microM). The binding of alpha-actinin to F-actin, as a function of actin concentration, is anomalous. The amount of bound alpha-actinin increases when actin concentration increases from 0 to 1.2 microM but does not change significantly when actin concentration is further increased up to 48 microM. A similar result is obtained with tropomyosin-decorated F-actin. These observations can be explained by an hypothesis that binding is a function of the alpha-actinin - F-actin association constant as well as of the rigidity of the gel. When the concentration of actin increases, the rigidity of the gel also increases and more work is required to bring two actin filaments to the reaction distance with alpha-actinin and, consequently, a larger alpha-actinin concentration is required to attain the same ratio of bound alpha-actinin to actin monomers in the filaments.

Actinin↗
PubMed1989

Kinetic evidence for insertion of actin monomers between the barbed ends of actin filaments and barbed end-bound insertin, a protein purified from smooth muscle.

An actin polymerization-retarding protein was isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle. This protein copurified with vinculin on DEAE-cellulose and gel filtration columns. The polymerization-retarding protein could be separated from vinculin by hydroxylapatite chromatography. The isolated polymerization-retarding protein lost its activity within a few days, but was stable for weeks when it was not separated from vinculin. We termed the polymerization-retarding protein "insertin". Because of the instability of the isolated insertin, we investigated the effect of insertin-vinculin on actin polymerization. Insertin-vinculin retarded nucleated actin polymerization maximally fivefold. Polymerization at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped actin filaments was not affected by insertin-vinculin, suggesting that insertin-vinculin binds to the barbed ends, but not to the pointed ends, of actin filaments. Retarded polymerization was observed even if the actin monomer concentration was between the critical concentrations of the ends of treadmilling actin filaments. As at this low monomer concentration the pointed ends depolymerize, monomers appeared to be inserted at the barbed ends between the terminal subunit and barbed end-bound insertin molecules. Insertin-vinculin was found not to increase the actin monomer concentration to the value of the pointed ends. These observations support the conclusion that insertin is not a barbed end-capping protein but an actin monomer-inserting protein. According to a quantitative analysis of the kinetic data, all observations could be explained by a model in which two insertin molecules were assumed to bind co-operatively to the barbed ends of actin filaments. Actin monomers were found to be inserted between the barbed ends and barbed end-bound insertin molecules at a rate of about 1 x 10(6) M-1 s-1. Insertin may be an essential part of the machinery of molecules that permit treadmilling of actin filaments in living cells by insertion of actin molecules between membranes and actin filaments.

Actins↗
PubMed2006

Mapping the ADF/cofilin binding site on monomeric actin by competitive cross-linking and peptide array: evidence for a second binding site on monomeric actin.

The binding sites for actin depolymerising factor (ADF) and cofilin on G-actin have been mapped by competitive chemical cross-linking using deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), gelsolin segment 1 (G1), thymosin beta4 (Tbeta4), and vitamin D-binding protein (DbP). To reduce ADF/cofilin induced actin oligomerisation we used ADP-ribosylated actin. Both vitamin D-binding protein and thymosin beta4 inhibit binding by ADF or cofilin, while cofilin or ADF and DNase I bind simultaneously. Competition was observed between ADF or cofilin and G1, supporting the hypothesis that cofilin preferentially binds in the cleft between sub-domains 1 and 3, similar to or overlapping the binding site of G1. Because the affinity of G1 is much higher than that of ADF or cofilin, even at a 20-fold excess of the latter, the complexes contained predominantly G1. Nevertheless, cross-linking studies using actin:G1 complexes and ADF or cofilin showed the presence of low concentrations of ternary complexes containing both ADF or cofilin and G1. Thus, even with monomeric actin, it is shown for the first time that binding sites for both G1 and ADF or cofilin can be occupied simultaneously, confirming the existence of two separate binding sites. Employing a peptide array with overlapping sequences of actin overlaid by cofilin, we have identified five sequence stretches of actin able to bind cofilin. These sequences are located within the regions of F-actin predicted to bind cofilin in the model derived from image reconstructions of electron microscopical images of cofilin-decorated filaments. Three of the peptides map to the cleft region between sub-domains 1 and 3 of the upper actin along the two-start long-pitch helix, while the other two are in the DNase I loop corresponding to the site of the lower actin in the helix. In the absence of any crystal structures of ADF or cofilin in complex with actin, these studies provide further information about the binding sites on F-actin for these important actin regulatory proteins.

Actins↗
PubMed1999

Thiol oxidation of actin produces dimers that enhance the elasticity of the F-actin network.

Slow oxidation of sulfhydryls, forming covalently linked actin dimers and higher oligomers, accounts for increases in the shear elasticity of purified actin observed after aging. Disulfide-bonded actin dimers are incorporated into F-actin during polymerization and generate cross-links between actin filaments. The large gel strength of oxidized actin (>100 Pa for 1 mg/ml) in the absence of cross-linking proteins falls to within the theoretically predicted order of magnitude for uncross-linked actin filament networks (1 Pa) with the addition of sufficient concentrations of reducing agents such as 5 mM dithiothreitol or 10 mM beta-mercaptoethanol. As little as 1 gelsolin/1000 actin subunits also lowers the high storage modulus of oxidized actin. The effects of gelsolin may be both to increase filament number as it severs F-actin and to cover the barbed end of an actin filament, which otherwise might cross-link to the side of another filament via an actin dimer. These new findings may explain why previous studies of actin rheology report a wide range of values when purified actin is polymerized without added regulatory proteins.

Actins↗
PubMed2003

Isolation and characterisation of tilapia beta-actin promoter and comparison of its activity with carp beta-actin promoter.

The regulatory sequence including proximal promoter, untranslated exon 1 and intron 1 of the beta-actin gene from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) has been isolated and spliced to a beta-galactosidase reporter gene to test its activity. Comparisons of promoter activity have been carried out with three different constructs: (1) 1.6 kb tilapia beta-actin regulatory sequence, (2) 1.5 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequence, and (3) 4.7 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequence. Although the 1.6 kb tilapia beta-actin regulatory sequence gave slightly different expression patterns in tilapia embryos assayed by in situ X-gal staining, no difference was observed in expression level when the tilapia sequence was compared with the 4.7 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequence by quantitative assay. In comparison with the 1.5 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequence, the 1.6 kb tilapia beta-actin regulatory sequence gave higher expression levels in tilapia embryos, while a reverse result was observed in zebrafish embryos. In cell transfection experiments, the 1.6 kb tilapia beta-actin regulatory sequence showed three to four times better activity in blue gill cells than either the 4.7 kb carp beta-actin or the 1.5 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequences. The 1.6 kb tilapia beta-actin regulatory sequence also drove higher reporter gene activity in somatic cells of tilapia than did the 4.7 kb carp beta-actin regulatory sequence following direct injection of constructs into muscle. Therefore, taken together, the data demonstrate that the tilapia beta-actin promoter can be used as an efficient regulatory sequence to produce autotransgenic tilapia.

Actins↗