Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Cycle Checkpoints”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,801 records · Page 100Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Myeloproliferative disorders: the centrosome connection.

Some myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) result from a reciprocal translocation that involves the FGFR1 gene and a partner gene. The event creates a chimeric gene that encodes a fusion protein with constitutive FGFR1 tyrosine kinase activity. FGFR1-MPD is a rare disease, but its study may provide interesting clues on different processes such as cell signalling, oncogenesis and stem cell renewal. Some partners of FGFR1 are centrosomal proteins. The corresponding oncogenic fusion kinases are targeted to the centrosome. Constitutive phosphorylation at this site may perturbate centrosome function and the cell cycle. Direct attack at this small organelle may be an efficient way for oncogenes to alter regulation of signalling for proliferation and survival and get rid of checkpoints in cell cycle progression. The same effect might be triggered by other fusion kinases in other MPD and non-MPD malignancies.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed1998

The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation.

The spindle assembly checkpoint mechanism delays anaphase initiation until all chromosomes are aligned at the metaphase plate. Activation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) by binding of CDC20 and CDH1 is required for exit from mitosis, and APC has been implicated as a target for the checkpoint intervention. We show that the human checkpoint protein hMAD2 prevents activation of APC by forming a hMAD2-CDC20-APC complex. When injected into Xenopus embryos, hMAD2 arrests cells at mitosis with an inactive APC. The recombinant hMAD2 protein exists in two-folded states: a tetramer and a monomer. Both the tetramer and the monomer bind to CDC20, but only the tetramer inhibits activation of APC and blocks cell cycle progression. Thus, hMAD2 binding is not sufficient for inhibition, and a change in hMAD2 structure may play a role in transducing the checkpoint signal. There are at least three different forms of mitotic APC that can be detected in vivo: an inactive hMAD2-CDC20-APC ternary complex present at metaphase, a CDC20-APC binary complex active in degrading specific substrates at anaphase, and a CDH1-APC complex active later in mitosis and in G1. We conclude that the checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest involves hMAD2 receiving an upstream signal to inhibit activation of APC.

Anaphase↗
PubMed2004

Polo-like kinases and Chk2 at the interface of DNA damage checkpoint pathways and mitotic regulation.

The cell cycle controls processes of DNA replication and segregation of replicated DNA into two daughter cells. These processes are coordinated by multiple signaling pathways, which employ many protein kinases. The members of the family of Polo-like protein kinases are among these key cell cycle regulators. In response to DNA damage and inhibited DNA replication, DNA structure checkpoints delay cell cycle progression to provide cells with time for repair of damaged DNA and protect it from more severe damage. These effects are achieved by affecting key players of the basic cell cycle regulation of the cells with damaged DNA. This review is focused on the interplay between Chk2, a bona fide checkpoint protein kinase, and Polo-like kinases.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cell cycle control and cell division: implications for chemically induced carcinogenesis.

Eukaryotic cells proceed through an ordered series of events constituting the cell cycle, during which their chromosomes are duplicated and one copy of each daughter chromosome segregates to each daughter cell (mitosis). A precise and stringent regulation of this cell cycle is absolutely necessary for normal development of multicellular organisms; loss of cell cycle control, however, may ultimately lead to the generation of tumors. The present article provides an overview on the molecular mechanisms constituting the two most important checkpoints within the cell cycle of eukaryotic cells, that is, the spindle/mitotic checkpoint and the DNA damage checkpoint. It will be discussed how these checkpoints may be impaired by chemical carcinogens and how these interactions may contribute to the generation of aneuploidy and accumulation of somatic mutations, two major characteristics of human tumor cells.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hus5 gene encodes a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme required for normal mitosis.

Normal eukaryotic cells do not enter mitosis unless DNA is fully replicated and repaired. Controls called 'checkpoints', mediate cell cycle arrest in response to unreplicated or damaged DNA. Two independent Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant screens, both of which aimed to isolate new elements involved in checkpoint controls, have identified alleles of the hus5+ gene that are abnormally sensitive to both inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to ionizing radiation. We have cloned and sequenced the hus5+ gene. It is a novel member of the E2 family of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (UBCs). To understand the role of hus5+ in cell cycle control we have characterized the phenotypes of the hus5 mutants and the hus5 gene disruption. We find that, whilst the mutants are sensitive to inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to irradiation, this is not due to an inability to undergo mitotic arrest. Thus, the hus5+ gene product is not directly involved in checkpoint control. However, in common with a large class of previously characterized checkpoint genes, it is required for efficient recovery from DNA damage or S-phase arrest and manifests a rapid death phenotype in combination with a temperature sensitive S phase and late S/G2 phase cdc mutants. In addition, hus5 deletion mutants are severely impaired in growth and exhibit high levels of abortive mitoses, suggesting a role for hus5+ in chromosome segregation. We conclude that this novel UBC enzyme plays multiple roles and is virtually essential for cell proliferation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint.

The spindle checkpoint prevents cell cycle progression in cells that have mitotic spindle defects. Although several spindle defects activate the spindle checkpoint, the exact nature of the primary signal is unknown. We have found that the budding yeast member of the Aurora protein kinase family, Ipl1p, is required to maintain a subset of spindle checkpoint arrests. Ipl1p is required to maintain the spindle checkpoint that is induced by overexpression of the protein kinase Mps1. Inactivating Ipl1p allows cells overexpressing Mps1p to escape from mitosis and segregate their chromosomes normally. Therefore, the requirement for Ipl1p in the spindle checkpoint is not a consequence of kinetochore and/or spindle defects. The requirement for Ipl1p distinguishes two different activators of the spindle checkpoint: Ipl1p function is required for the delay triggered by chromosomes whose kinetochores are not under tension, but is not required for arrest induced by spindle depolymerization. Ipl1p localizes at or near kinetochores during mitosis, and we propose that Ipl1p is required to monitor tension at the kinetochore.

Aurora Kinases↗
PubMed2004

The stress kinase MRK contributes to regulation of DNA damage checkpoints through a p38gamma-independent pathway.

DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation (IR) activates a complex cellular response that includes checkpoints leading to cell cycle arrest. The stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38gamma has been implicated in the G(2) phase checkpoint induced by IR. We recently discovered MRK as a member of the MAPK kinase kinase family that activates p38gamma. Here we investigated the role of MRK in the checkpoint response to IR. We identified autophosphorylation sites on MRK that are important for its kinase activity. A phosphospecific antibody that recognizes these sites showed that MRK is activated upon IR in a rapid and sustained manner. MRK depletion by RNA interference resulted in defective S and G(2) checkpoints induced by IR that were accompanied by reduced Chk2 phosphorylation and delayed Cdc25A degradation. We also showed that Chk2 is a substrate for MRK in vitro and is phosphorylated at Thr(68) by active MRK in cells. MRK depletion also increased sensitivity to the killing effects of IR. In addition, MRK depletion reduced IR-induced activation of p38gamma but had no effect on p38alpha activation, indicating that MRK is a specific activator of p38gamma after IR. Inhibition of p38gamma by RNA interference, however, did not impair IR-induced checkpoints. Thus, in response to IR MRK controls two independent pathways: the Chk2-Cdc25A pathway leading to cell cycle arrest and the p38gamma MAPK pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Pentoxifylline stimulates drug-induced apoptosis in leukemic cells.

Camptothecin (CAM) and cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), cis-Pt) were used as inducers of apoptosis in the mouse leukemic L1210 cells. Relatively high concentrations of 50 micromol cis-Pt and 50 micromol CAM, respectively, were used to induce the apoptotic DNA ladder. The simultaneous treatment of L1210 cells by the drug and pentoxifylline (PTX) resulted in a decrease of drug concentrations necessary for the induction of apoptosis. This study revealed that a cell cycle G2 checkpoint inhibitor PTX reduces time intervals necessary for the onset of drug-induced apoptosis in these cells. This fact might be important as the earlier onset of programmed cell death may decrease a risk of tumor cells to become resistant to drug therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from Mad2.

The mitotic checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression before anaphase in case of mistakes in the alignment of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. In budding yeast, the Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 2, 3 proteins mediate this arrest. Vertebrate homologues of Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 3 bind to unattached kinetochores and prevent progression through mitosis by inhibiting Cdc20/APC-mediated proteolysis of anaphase inhibitors, like Pds1 and B-type cyclins. We investigated the role of Bub2 in budding yeast mitotic checkpoint. The following observations indicate that Bub2 and Mad1, 2 probably activate the checkpoint via different pathways: (a) unlike the other Mad and Bub proteins, Bub2 localizes at the spindle pole body (SPB) throughout the cell cycle; (b) the effect of concomitant lack of Mad1 or Mad2 and Bub2 is additive, since nocodazole-treated mad1 bub2 and mad2 bub2 double mutants rereplicate DNA more rapidly and efficiently than either single mutant; (c) cell cycle progression of bub2 cells in the presence of nocodazole requires the Cdc26 APC subunit, which, conversely, is not required for mad2 cells in the same conditions. Altogether, our data suggest that activation of the mitotic checkpoint blocks progression through mitosis by independent and partially redundant mechanisms.

Calcium-Binding Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Evaluating putative mechanisms of the mitotic spindle checkpoint.

The mitotic spindle checkpoint halts the cell cycle until all chromosomes are attached to the mitotic spindles. Evidence suggests that the checkpoint prevents cell-cycle progression by inhibiting the activity of the APC-Cdc20 complex, but the precise mechanism underlying this inhibition is not yet known. Here, we use mathematical modeling to compare several mechanisms that could account for this inhibition. We describe the interplay between the capacities to strongly inhibit cell-cycle progression before spindle attachment on one hand and to rapidly resume cell-cycle progression once the last kinetochore is attached on the other hand. We find that inhibition that is restricted to the kinetochore region is not sufficient for supporting both requirements when realistic diffusion constants are considered. A mechanism that amplifies the checkpoint signal through autocatalyzed inhibition is also insufficient. In contrast, amplifying the signal through the release of a diffusible inhibitory complex can support reliable checkpoint function. Our results suggest that the design of the spindle checkpoint network is limited by physical constraints imposed by realistic diffusion constants and the relevant spatial and temporal dimensions where computation is performed.

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome↗
PubMed2000

mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development.

Checkpoints block cell cycle progression in eukaryotic cells exposed to DNA damaging agents. We show that several Drosophila homologs of checkpoint genes, mei-41, grapes, and 14-3-3epsilon, regulate a DNA damage checkpoint in the developing eye. We have used this assay to show that the mutagen-sensitive gene mus304 is also required for this checkpoint. mus304 encodes a novel coiled-coil domain protein, which is targeted to the cytoplasm. Similar to mei-41, mus304 is required for chromosome break repair and for genomic stability. mus304 animals also exhibit three developmental defects, abnormal bristle morphology, decreased meiotic recombination, and arrested embryonic development. We suggest that these phenotypes reflect distinct developmental consequences of a single underlying checkpoint defect. Similar mechanisms may account for the puzzling array of symptoms observed in humans with mutations in the ATM tumor suppressor gene.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

[Influence of antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1/2 on apoptosis of K562 cell induced by DDP].

In order to investigate the change of cell-cycle of K562 cells induced by cisplatin (DDP) and role of antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1/2 on apoptosis of K562 cell induced by DDP, the change of cell-cycle was observed by means of flow cytometry after different intervals in which the K562 cell were treated by DDP. Chk1/2 protein expression was investigated by Western blot and confocal microscopy in best condition of transfection of antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1/2 by lipofection. Apoptosis of K562 induced by DDP was investigated by flow cytometry after transfection of antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1/2. The results showed that K562 cells were arrested at S phase at 10 micromol/L of DDP. Transfection with antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1/2 could inhibit expression of Chk1/2 at different levels. The frequency of apoptosis induced by DDP was increased when transfected with antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1 and/or Chk2. The effect of antisense oligonucleotide targeting Chk1 and Chk2 synchronously exceeded that of antisense oligonucleotide targeting either Chk1 or Chk2 alone. In conclusion, Chk1 and Chk2 may be regarded as targets of therapy for leukemia.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

The cell cycle in protozoan parasites.

Research into cell cycle control in protozoan parasites, which are responsible for major public health problems in the developing world, has been hampered by the difficulties in performing classical genetic analysis with these organisms. Nevertheless, in a large part thanks to the data gathered in other eukaryotic systems and to the acquisition of the sequences of parasite genes homologous to cell cycle regulators, many molecular tools required for an in-depth study of the cell cycle in protozoan parasites have been collected over the past few years. Despite the considerable phylogenetic divergence between these organisms and other eukaryotes, and notwithstanding important specificities such as the apparent lack of checkpoints during cell cycle progression, available data indicate that the major families of cell cycle regulators appear to operate in protozoan parasites. Functional studies are now needed to define the precise role of these regulators in the life cycle of the parasites, and to possibly validate cell cycle control elements as potential targets for chemotherapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Anaphase inactivation of the spindle checkpoint.

The spindle checkpoint delays cell cycle progression until microtubules attach each pair of sister chromosomes to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle. Following sister chromatid separation, however, the checkpoint ignores chromosomes whose kinetochores are attached to only one spindle pole, a state that activates the checkpoint prior to metaphase. We demonstrate that, in budding yeast, mutual inhibition between the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and Mps1, an essential component of the checkpoint, leads to sustained inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. Mps1 protein abundance decreases in anaphase, and Mps1 is a target of the APC. Furthermore, expression of Mps1 in anaphase, or repression of the APC in anaphase, reactivates the spindle checkpoint. This APC-Mps1 feedback circuit allows cells to irreversibly inactivate the checkpoint during anaphase.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint.

To counteract the continuous exposure of cells to agents that damage DNA, cells have evolved complex regulatory networks called checkpoints to sense DNA damage and coordinate DNA replication, cell-cycle arrest and DNA repair. It has recently been shown that the histone H2A variant H2AX specifically controls the recruitment of DNA repair proteins to the sites of DNA damage. Here we identify a novel BRCA1 carboxy-terminal (BRCT) and forkhead-associated (FHA) domain-containing protein, MDC1 (mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1), which works with H2AX to promote recruitment of repair proteins to the sites of DNA breaks and which, in addition, controls damage-induced cell-cycle arrest checkpoints. MDC1 forms foci that co-localize extensively with gamma-H2AX foci within minutes after exposure to ionizing radiation. H2AX is required for MDC1 foci formation, and MDC1 forms complexes with phosphorylated H2AX. Furthermore, this interaction is phosphorylation dependent as peptides containing the phosphorylated site on H2AX bind MDC1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. We have shown by using small interfering RNA (siRNA) that cells lacking MDC1 are sensitive to ionizing radiation, and that MDC1 controls the formation of damage-induced 53BP1, BRCA1 and MRN foci, in part by promoting efficient H2AX phosphorylation. In addition, cells lacking MDC1 also fail to activate the intra-S phase and G2/M phase cell-cycle checkpoints properly after exposure to ionizing radiation, which was associated with an inability to regulate Chk1 properly. These results highlight a crucial role for MDC1 in mediating transduction of the DNA damage signal.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1997

Inhibition of radiation-induced G2 delay potentiates cell death by apoptosis and/or the induction of giant cells in colorectal tumor cells with disrupted p53 function.

We have previously identified a p53-independent apoptotic response that is delayed until 48-72 h after irradiation of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma cells. Because the delay appears to be in part due to a transient G2 cell cycle arrest, the importance of this checkpoint in the mechanism of ionizing radiation (IR)-induced death of colorectal tumor cells was investigated. An adenoma cell line with (282Arg-->Trp) mutant p53 (S/RG/C2) and a carcinoma cell line (PC/JW/FI) lacking p53 protein treated with 5 Gy IR in the presence of 1.5 mm caffeine (CAF) reduced IR-induced G2 arrest and increased the level of apoptosis (1.5-1.6-fold) 24 h after treatment. Increased IR apoptotic cell death with CAF significantly reduced IR cell survival over a 7-day period in S/RG/C2 and PC/JW/FI. To investigate whether CAF radiosensitization correlated with lack of wild-type (wt) p53, we studied transfected derivatives of an adenoma-derived cell line (PC/AA/C1), in which the endogenous wt p53 activity was disrupted by the expression of a dominant negative (273Arg-->His) p53 mutant protein (designated AA/273p53/B). This p53-defective cell line was also radiosensitized by CAF, whereas the vector control (AA/PCMV/D), which retained wt p53 activity, was not. In addition, as with the S/RG/C2 and PC/JW/FI cell lines, the 7-day IR cell survival was reduced significantly in AA/273p53/B compared with the vector control cell line. This suggests that radiosensitization by CAF and increased cell death is dependent on loss of wt p53 function. Interestingly, radiosensitization of the AA/273p53/B cell line was not associated with accelerated apoptosis but correlated with increased polyploid giant cells, which have been associated with disruption of cell cycle checkpoints and genomic instability. These results demonstrate that G2 checkpoint inhibition with CAF leads to preferential IR cell killing in cell lines in which wt p53 is inactivated and that this increased cell killing is not necessarily dependent on increased IR-induced apoptosis.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2005

1-(5-Chloro-2-alkoxyphenyl)-3-(5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)ureas [correction of cyanopyrazi] as potent and selective inhibitors of Chk1 kinase: synthesis, preliminary SAR, and biological activities.

The discovery of 1-(5-chloro-2-alkoxyphenyl)-3-(5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)ureas as a new class of potent (IC(50) values of 3-10 nM) and selective inhibitors of Chk1 kinase was described. One of these compounds (2e) potentiates HeLa cells by over 22-fold against doxorubicin in an antiproliferation assay, and SW620 cells against camptothecin by 20-fold in an antiproliferation assay and 14-fold in a soft agar assay. Flow cytometry (FACS) analysis confirmed that 2e abrogated G2 checkpoint arrest of H1299 cells caused by doxorubicin and S checkpoint arrest caused by camptothecin.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Refine your search to explore more results.