Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BACK”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,801 records · Page 100Linked to original sources

Nonsurgical hospitalization for low-back pain. Is it necessary?

In 1988, the Diagnosis-Related Group for "Medical Back Problems" was the seventh leading reason for all U.S. hospitalizations. The authors sought to describe the content of these hospitalizations and consider the potential for shifting nonsurgical care to the outpatient setting. Three complementary data sources (the 1988 National Hospital Discharge Survey, a statewide Washington hospital discharge registry, and medical records) were used to examine the diagnoses, tests, treatments, resource use, and subsequent care associated with these hospitalizations. Nationally, nonspecific back pain and herniated discs were the most common diagnoses. Nearly half the hospitalizations were for diagnostic tests (especially myelography) and the other half for pain control. In Washington state, 43% of patients were admitted by family physicians or internists, and 40% by orthopedic or neurologic surgeons. Twenty percent of patients underwent subsequent back surgery within 1 year (most within 3 months), suggesting that many hospitalizations were "presurgical." Most of the tests and treatments identified are known to be safe in the outpatient setting. Focused medical record review indicated frequent psychosocial problems or complicating factors, including obesity, substance abuse, prior back surgery, psychologic diagnoses, or lack of a caregiver at home. The findings support other evidence that many hospitalizations for "medical back problems" are unnecessary, but also suggest a need for improved outpatient and home-based alternatives to hospitalization.

Ambulatory Care↗

Intrathecal administration of oxytocin induces analgesia in low back pain involving the endogenous opiate peptide system.

STUDY DESIGN: The effect of oxytocin on low back pain in patients and its mechanism in rats were investigated. METHODS: Intrathecal injection, radioimmunoassay, and potassium iontophoresis tail-flick test were used to investigate the effect of oxytocin. RESULTS: In humans, acute and chronic low back pain causes a marked change of oxytocin content within cerebral spinal fluid and plasma; oxytocin relieves low back pain (ED50 0.172 in chronic and 0.121 micrograms/kg in acute). In rats, oxytocin had a dose-related analgesic effect (ED50 0.067 micrograms/kg). At high levels, oxytocin induced locomotor ataxia (ED50 17.915 micrograms/kg) and death (LD50 27.224 micrograms/kg). Oxytocin antagonist [d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2, Orn8]-vasotocin and opiate receptor-blocker naloxone could reverse oxytocin-induced analgesia. Oxytocin also increased beta-endorphin, L-encephalin, and dynorphin A1-13 contents in the spinal cord, whereas oxytocin antagonist caused a decrease. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that oxytocin induces analgesia in low back pain involving the endogenous opiate peptide system and may be effective and safe in acute and chronic low back pain.

Adult↗

Comparing the costs between provider types of episodes of back pain care.

STUDY DESIGN: This study was a prospective, community-based, observational design. OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the costs of episodes of back pain care between different provider types in a population representative of the U.S. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous comparisons between provider types of the costs for back pain care have been restricted to the worker's compensation population or have used something other than the episode as the unit of analysis. METHODS: Data from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment (HIE) were analyzed. Insurance claims forms were examined for all visits specified by the patient as occurring for back pain. Visits were grouped into episodes using decision rules and clinical judgment. The primary provider was defined as the provider who delivered most of the care. Comparisons of costs between provider types were made. RESULTS: There were 1020 episodes of back pain care made by 686 different persons and encompassing 8825 visits. Chiropractors and general practitioners were the primary providers for 40% and 26% of episodes, respectively. Chiropractors had a significantly greater mean number of visits per episode (10.4) than did other practitioners. Orthopedic physicians and "other" physicians were significantly more costly on a per visit basis. Orthopedists had the highest mean total cost per episode, and general practitioners the lowest. Chiropractors had the highest, and general practitioners the lowest mean outpatient cost per episode. CONCLUSIONS: These are economically significant differences in the costs of back pain care of persons seeing chiropractors, general practitioners, internists, and orthopedists.

Back Pain↗

The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.

STUDY DESIGN: The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale is a 20-item self-administered instrument designed to assess the level of functional disability in individuals with back pain. The scale was administered as part of a larger questionnaire to a group of 242 back pain patients. Follow-up data were obtained after several days and after 2 to 6 months. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether the Quebec scale is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of disability in back pain, and to compare it with other disability scales. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A number of functional disability scales for back pain are being used, but their conceptual validity is uncertain. Unlike most published instruments, the Quebec scale was constructed using a conceptual approach to disability assessment and empirical methods of item development, analysis, and selection. METHODS: The authors calculated test-retest and internal consistency coefficients, evaluated construct validity of the scale, and tested its responsiveness against a global index of change. Direct comparisons with the Roland, Oswestry, and SF-36 scales were carried out. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was 0.92, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.96. The scale correlated as expected with other measures of disability, pain, medical history, and utilization variables, work-related variables, and socio-demographic characteristics. Significant changes in disability over time, and differences in change scores between patients that were expected to differ in the direction of change, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The Quebec scale can be recommended as an outcome measure in clinical trials, and for monitoring the progress of individual patients participating in treatment or rehabilitation programs.

Adolescent↗

The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional analytic study of patients with chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the criteria for internal disc disruption, as adopted by the International Association for the Study of Pain, could be satisfied in patients with chronic low back pain and to test whether there were any conventional clinical features that could identify this condition. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Internal disc disruption has been postulated as an important cause of low back pain. To diagnose this condition, the International Association for the Study of Pain taxonomy requires that pain be reproduced on provocation discography and that computed tomography discography reveal internal disc disruption, provided that as a control, stimulation of at least one other disc fails to reproduce pain. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients with chronic low back pain and no history of previous lumbar surgery were studied. Each patient underwent a standard physical examination. Computed tomography discography was performed at a minimum of two levels. RESULTS: The diagnostic criteria for internal disc disruption were fully satisfied in 39% of patients, most commonly at L5-S1 and L4-L5. None of the clinical tests used could differentiate between those patients with internal disc disruption and other patients. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of internal disc disruption can be made in a significant proportion of patients with chronic low back pain, but no conventional clinical test can discriminate patients with internal disc disruption from patients with other conditions.

Adult↗

Body motion patterns during a novel repetitive wheel-rotation task. A comparative study of healthy subjects and patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This study evaluated performance differences between patients with chronic low back pain and a control group during their performance of a novel functional capacity task. OBJECTIVE: To 1) evaluated strength and endurance differences between patients and control subjects, 2) test for movement pattern differences between these groups, and 3) evaluate how these patterns changed with repetitive performance of the wheel-turning task. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite increased emphasis on quantifying functional capacities, few well-controlled studies comparing the performances of patients with low back pain with those of control subjects have appeared in the literature, particularly for movement patterns. METHODS: Forty patients with low back pain and 40 control subjects performed a sustained isodynamic wheel turning task. This task was selected because it simultaneously combined several common pain-related movements. A set of kinematic measures to characterize the basic movement patterns during this task were developed. RESULTS: Control subjects produced significantly higher levels of static torque and completed significantly more wheel-turning repetitions. Patients with low back pain exhibited significantly less upper torso and pelvic motion, upper torso rotation, and lateral trunk flexion than those in the control group. CONCLUSION: The dissimilar movement strategies found between the patient and control groups suggests that factors beyond more global physical explanations (e.g., deconditioning) may be important in accounting for the large discrepancy between these groups regarding the amount of work performed. These findings, along with the basic kinematic patterns developed in this study, may have important implications for determining the efficacy of instruction in body mechanics and treatment outcome for patients with chronic low back pain.

Adult↗

Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: Low back pain patients seen in primary care were allocated randomly to one of two educational interventions or to usual care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate educational interventions designed to improve the outcomes of primary care for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with back pain are frequently dissatisfied with their medical care and identify lack of information as the most insufficient aspect. METHODS: In a large Health Maintenance Organization clinic, 293 subjects were allocated randomly to receive usual care, an educational booklet, or a 15-minute session with a clinic nurse, including the booklet and a follow-up telephone call. Outcome measures included satisfaction with care, perceived knowledge, participation in exercise, functional status, symptom relief, and health care use. Outcomes were assessed 1, 3, 7, and 52 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The nurse intervention resulted in higher patient satisfaction than usual care (P < 0.001) and higher perceived knowledge (P < 0.001). Self-reported exercise participation was also higher in the nurse intervention group after a 1-week follow-up period (97% vs. 65% in the other groups; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in worry, symptoms, functional status, or health care use at any follow-up interval. Differences in self-reported exercise and perceived knowledge were no longer significant after 7 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the value of purely educational approaches in reducing functional impact or health care use related to back pain and also challenge the value of fitness exercise in the most acute phase of back pain.

Adult↗

Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study consisted of the evaluation of a double sacroiliac block in patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of sacroiliac pain in a selected population of patients suffering from low back pain, and to assess certain pain provocation tests. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have implicated the sacroliac joint as a potential etiology of back and leg pain, but none has tested double anesthetic blocks in a prospective fashion. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with unilateral low back pain, pain mapping compatible with a sacroiliac origin, tenderness over the sacroiliac joint, and no obvious source of pain in the lumbar spine were selected for a double anesthetic block. The procedure consisted of a through clinical examination with a visual analog scale, testing of sacroiliac pain provocation tests followed by a first screening block with a short-acting anesthetic. A second examination consisting of the same tests assessed the efficacy of the first block. If results were positive, a confirmatory block was performed. All blocks were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had a positive response to the first block. Among them, 10 (18.5%) were temporarily relieved by the confirmatory block. No pain provocation test reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the sacroiliac joint is an uncommon but real source of low back pain. The accuracy of some of the presumed "sacroiliac pain provocations tests" is questioned.

Adult↗

Effect of an early intervention program on the relationship between subjective pain and disability measures in nurses with low back injury.

STUDY DESIGN: The effect of a workplace-based early intervention program on perceptions of pain and disability in nurses with low back injury was studied using a preintervention versus postintervention design with concurrent control group. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship and changes over time between pain and disability measures in two groups of back-injured nurses--those who received the early intervention program (study) and those who were not offered the program (control). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between back pain and disability is not straightforward. The effects of an intervention program on changes in perceptions of pain and disability over time have not been widely reported. METHODS: The Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire and a visual analog pain scale were administered to 46 study nurses and 137 control nurses at time of injury and at 6 months after injury. Correlation and regression analyses were used to explore the relationships between the two measures. Changes over time were compared with analyses of variance. RESULTS: Pain and disability were positively correlated in both groups at time of injury and at follow-up evaluation. Mean scores for pain and disability were lower at follow-up evaluation than at initial injury in both groups; study nurses had significantly (P < 0.01) lower scores at 6 months than nurses in the control group. Disability at time of injury predicted disability at 6 months only for nurses in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This workplace-based early intervention program decreased levels of pain and disability in back-injured nurses and altered the relationship between these two variables over a 6-month time interval.

Demography↗

Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis.

STUDY DESIGN: The contribution of transversus abdominis to spinal stabilization was evaluated indirectly in people with and without low back pain using an experimental model identifying the coordination of trunk muscles in response to a disturbances to the spine produced by arm movement. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the temporal sequence of trunk muscle activity associated with arm movement, and to determine if dysfunction of this parameter was present in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have evaluated the motor control of trunk muscles or the potential for dysfunction of this system in patients with low back pain. Evaluation of the response of trunk muscles to limb movement provides a suitable model to evaluate this system. Recent evidence indicates that this evaluation should include transversus abdominis. METHODS: While standing, 15 patients with low back pain and 15 matched control subjects performed rapid shoulder flexion, abduction, and extension in response to a visual stimulus. Electromyographic activity of the abdominal muscles, lumbar multifidus, and the surface electrodes. RESULTS: Movement in each direction resulted in contraction of trunk muscles before or shortly after the deltoid in control subjects. The transversus abdominis was invariably the first muscle active and was not influenced by movement direction, supporting the hypothesized role of this muscle in spinal stiffness generation. Contraction of transversus abdominis was significantly delayed in patients with low back pain with all movements. Isolated differences were noted in the other muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed onset of contraction of transversus abdominis indicates a deficit of motor control and is hypothesized to result in inefficient muscular stabilization of the spine.

Adult↗

Self-reported physical exertion in geriatric care. A risk indicator for low back symptoms?

STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of 131 female nursing aides who took part in an intervention program with physical training or education. Assessments were performed before the intervention program and after 6 months. At follow-up evaluation, 91 nursing aides remained in the study. OBJECTIVES: To examine if perceived physical exertion was a risk indicator for low back symptoms, and to examine the relationship between perceived physical exertion, aerobic capacity, back endurance, psychological demands, and job control. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Perceived physical exertion frequently is assessed in epidemiologic studies concerning low back symptoms. More information about the relationship between perceived exertion, other potential risk indicators, and symptoms may provide opportunities for effective prevention of symptoms. METHODS: Assessments were obtained by questionnaires and physical capacity tests. RESULTS: The nursing aides who reported high physical exertion and were 45 years of age or older were at greater risk in the follow-up period for reporting new symptoms, continued symptoms with the same intensity, or more intense symptoms from the low back (rate ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.2). The exposure variable correlated most strongly (r = 0.4) with perceived physical exertion was psychological demands. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated being aged 45 years or older, combined with high perceived physical exertion, was a risk indicator for low back symptoms. A relationship between perceived physical exertion and psychological demands was observed, but there was no influence of physical capacity on perceived physical exertion.

Adult↗

Should the gap be filled between guidelines and actual practice for management of low back pain in primary care? The Quebec experience.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To describe health services utilization for low back pain in the province of Quebec, Canada, and to compare it with North American guidelines. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Quebec Task Force and the Agency for Health Care Planning and Research (United States) published guidelines for the management of low back pain in 1987 and 1994, respectively. METHODS: A cohort of 2147 adults with low back pain identified at the Quebec Worker's Compensation Board were selected randomly and observed over 2 years' time for their health care utilization profile. RESULTS: During the study period, 57.8% of the workers still under active care 7 weeks after their back injury had not yet been referred to a specialist. Specialized imaging techniques were obtained by 4.5% of the patients, with a delay of 7 weeks or more in 66% of them. Surgery was performed on 1.6% of the patients. The presence of an initial specific diagnosis and proximity to a university hospital significantly increased utilization rate and reduced the delays. CONCLUSION: Health services utilization for back pain in Quebec was equal or lower to what currently is practiced elsewhere, but access to specialists was not meeting the current recommendations. This would represent a 12% net increase in new specialist contacts and a quicker access in 39% who saw a specialist. Before such an effort can be considered, health care planners will need a better definition of the role of the specialist consultation in the guidelines and scientific evidence specifically addressing their benefit in primary care, especially in the absence of a specific diagnosis.

Adolescent↗

Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-one patients with low back pain were examined by two physiotherapists (50 patients) and two physicians (21 patients). The two physiotherapists had worked together for many years, but the two physicians had not. The interexaminer reliability of the clinical tests included in the physical examination was evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interexaminer reliability of clinical tests used in the physical examination of patients with low back pain under ideal circumstances, which was the case for the physiotherapists. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous clinical tests are used in the evaluation of patients with low back pain. To reach the correct diagnosis, only tests with an acceptable validity and reliability should be used. Previous studies have mainly shown low reliability. It is important that clinical tests not be rejected because of low reliability caused by differences between examiners in performance of the examination and in their definition of normal results. METHODS: Two examiners, either two physiotherapists or two physicians, independently examined patients with low back pain. RESULTS: In approximately half of the clinical tests studied, an acceptable reliability was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the physiotherapists series, the reliability was acceptable for a number of clinical tests that are used in the evaluation of patients with low back pain. The results suggest that clinical tests should be standardized to a much higher degree than they are today.

Adolescent↗

Predictors of outcome in patients with chronic back pain and low-grade spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors influencing symptom relief after uninstrumented posterolateral spinal fusion with or without decompression in adult patients with chronic back pain and previously asymptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of previously asymptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in chronic adult low back pain is unclear. Operative intervention in this setting is controversial. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive adult patients with chronic low back pain and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis first detected during routine work-up of new onset low back pain underwent spinal fusion with or without decompression. The influence of active worker's compensation or litigation claims, radicular pain, concomitant laminectomy, age, gender, fusion to L4, intervertebral disc bulge, and pseudarthrosis were investigated. RESULTS: All 13 patients involved in worker's compensation claims or pending litigation had fair or poor results. Nine of 11 patients without such issues had good or excellent results. Although the strong association of worker's compensation with poor results made it difficult to assess the importance of other risk factors, the data suggest that good results may be more likely in patients with radiculopathy who undergo laminectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation, although limited by a number of factors including small sample size and retrospective, unblinded review, suggests that active worker's compensation and litigation issues are associated strongly with poor results of operative management for chronic low back pain in adult patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Adult↗

Reduction of sick leave for lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, consecutive, controlled cohort study, the authors analyzed the impact of a differentiated, individual-based treatment program on sick leave during pregnancy for women experiencing lumbar back or posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with pain early in pregnancy and, by means of individual information and differentiated physiotherapy, reduce sick leave during pregnancy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sick leave for back pain during pregnancy is common, and treatment programs have been aimed at reducing pain, for that reason. In Sweden, the average sick leave due to back pain during pregnancy is 7 weeks. METHODS: All pregnant women who attended a specific antenatal clinic and experienced lumbar back or posterior pelvic pain were included in an intervention group, and results were compared with women in a control group from another antenatal clinic. RESULTS: The intervention group comprised 54 women, compared with 81 women in the control group. Thirty-three women were on sick leave for an average of 30 days in the intervention group versus 45 women for an average of 54 days in the control group (P < 0.001). The reduction in sick leave reduced insurance costs by approximately $53,000 U.S. CONCLUSIONS: Sick leave for lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain in the intervention group was significantly reduced with the program, and the program was cost effective.

Cohort Studies↗

A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a model of management of subacute back pain, to prevent prolonged disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The present management of back pain seems inadequate, and development of innovative models has been urged. METHODS: A model for the treatment of subacute work-related back pain has been developed and evaluated in a population-based randomized clinical trial. Workers (n = 130) from eligible workplaces in the Sherbrooke area (N = 31), who had been absent from work for more than 4 weeks for back pain, were randomized, based on their workplace, in one of four treatment groups: usual care, clinical intervention, occupational intervention, and full intervention (a combination of the last two). The duration of absence from regular work and from any work was evaluated using survival analysis. Functional status and pain were compared at study entry and after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: The full intervention group returned to regular work 2.41 times faster than the usual care intervention group (95% confidence interval 1.19-4.89; P < 0.01). The specific effect of the occupational intervention accounted for the most important part of this result, with a rate ratio of return to regular work of 1.91 (95% confidence interval = 1.18-3.10; P < 0.01). Pain and disability scales demonstrated either a statistically significant reduction or a trend toward reduction in the three intervention groups, compared with the trend in the usual care intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Close association of occupational intervention with clinical care is of primary importance in impeding progression toward chronicity of low back pain.

Adolescent↗

Diagnostic and management procedures for compensable back injuries without serious associated injuries. Modeling of the 1991 injury cohort from a major Michigan compensation insurer.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 2425 workers with compensated back conditions was created from the 1991 compensated cohort of the largest compensation insurer in Michigan by linking computerized information on social and demographic factors, diagnostic and management procedures, and cumulative missed worktime. OBJECTIVE: To describe medical care use from date of injury in 1991 to mid-1993 by type of back condition, to identify factors affecting this use, to determine the effect of alternative model selection strategies on identifying such factors, to investigate the timing of surgery and the use of diagnostic studies in patients with displaced or herniated discs with and without surgery, and to compare the use of medical care in the study group with that recommended by national expert panels. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the enormous costs involved in medical care for patients with work-related back injuries, almost no information on the use of medical care is available for compensated back injuries by diagnostic and procedure code. METHODS: Use of medical care was grouped into 18 categories for tabulation. Factors affecting use of medical care were identified by logistic regression, supplemented by Cox analysis for time to first procedure. The Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square statistic was compared with the Bayes Information Criterion for evaluating model fit. Overall model utility was evaluated by comparing receiver operating characteristic curves generated by the model. For patients with displaced or herniated discs, algorithms were used to identify the diagnostic procedures performed before and after the first surgery and the amount of time that passed before each procedure was performed. RESULTS: In patients with diagnoses of disc displacement or herniation or vertebrogenic neuritis, approximately 80% underwent radiography to obtain plain views of the spine, 75% underwent diagnostic imaging, 45% underwent electrodiagnostic procedures, and 24% underwent spinal surgery (29.3% had surgical procedures among those with disc conditions). In patients with diagnoses of back sprain or other symptomatic diagnoses, the percentages for the first three procedures are approximately 70%, 12%, and 12%, respectively. Diagnostic category, age, gender, and cumulative missed worktime predicted the receipt of diagnostic and treatment procedures. Women were 30% less likely to undergo computed axial tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and 50% less likely to undergo spinal surgery. Median time to spinal surgery was twice as long in the group that underwent diagnostic imaging and electrodiagnostic testing before surgery (134.5 days). Of the 622 patients with disc displacement/herniation, 510 (approximately 80%) had initial diagnostic imaging studies, and, of the 510, 162 (approximately 30%) had surgery. Thirteen (8%) were reoperated. Of the 162 patients who had surgery, 46 (approximately 30%) had follow-up diagnostic imaging, and, of the 46, nine (approximately 20%) were reoperated. Of the 348 managed conservatively, 96 (approximately 30%) had follow-up diagnostic imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest only modest differences in the use of medical care between this study group and noncompensated study populations from previous reports. The authors of this study estimate that 27% of diagnostic imaging studies and 43% of plain radiography of the spine could have been avoided if then available Canadian recommendations or current American, guidelines had been followed. The gender effect remains unexplained and needs to be investigated in additional studies. There was an increase of 6% in the use of surgery in compensated patients compared with the use of surgery in a recent American series involving traditional health insurance, but this may be associated with greater work disability in the compensated group. The results of the current study suggest that the use and reporting of model selection strategies and the use of receiver operati

Adolescent↗

Back pain in primary care. Patient characteristics, content of initial visit, and short-term outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of patients making primary care visits for back pain. OBJECTIVE: To examine the content of primary care visits for back pain in patients with little interference of pain with activities at the visit and 1 month later; high interference of pain with activities at the visit but not 1 month later; and high interference of pain with activities, both at the visit and 1 month later. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Advice about resumption of activities may be therapeutic for patients with back pain, but little is known about the extent to which primary care providers assess and respond to limitation of activities in patients. METHODS: Audiotapes of primary care visits for back pain were coded for content. Patients indicated their goals for the visit and completed measures of pain and the pain's interference with activities, just before the visit and 1 month later. RESULTS: In most visits, providers did not assess functional limitations related to pain and did not discuss how to resume normal activities, although this was a highly rated goal for most patients. Providers did not appear to assess or respond to patients differently according to how much pain interfered with their activities. However, in patients with high interference of pain with activities, there was more discussion of limitation of activities and how to return to usual activities among those who improved than there was among those who did not improve during the next month. CONCLUSIONS: Although back pain frequently is associated with limitation of activity, pain's interference with activities is assessed inconsistently in primary care visits.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Refine your search to explore more results.