Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Clinical management of chlamydia in general practice: a survey of reported practice.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the UK. Prevalence of the infection in different health care settings has been found to be between 2% and 29% and diagnoses of the infection continue to rise significantly. It is estimated, however, that only 10% of all chlamydial infections are seen and treated in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. Few data exist about the actual practice patterns of primary care providers in the management of chlamydia. The management of patients identified with the infection within this setting warrants attention. AIMS: To determine general practitioners' (GPs') and nurses' reported clinical practice in the management of genital chlamydial infection. To design a needs-based education guideline on the management of chlamydia in rural primary care. DESIGN: An anonymous, confidential, self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs and cervical cytology practice nurses in 84 practices in Dyfed Powys Health Authority (DPHA) area, Wales, UK. RESULTS: Following two mailings of the survey, responses were obtained from 75/84 practices (response rate 89%). A total of 130/307 GPs (response rate 42%) and 72/152 nurses (response rate 47%) in these practices responded. The data demonstrated that few tests for chlamydia are being carried out in general practice: 42% (55/130) of GPs and 54% (37/72) of nurses reported carrying out between one and four tests a month, and 35% (46/130) of GPs and 29% (21/72) of nurses reported performing less than one test a month. Very few positive results are being obtained. The majority of GPs (72%) and nurses (68%) routinely use the appropriate endocervical swab when testing for chlamydia, however 19% of GPs and 20% of nurses are using either an incorrect wooden-stemmed swab or are taking an inappropriate high vaginal swab. CONCLUSIONS: Few chlamydia tests are being performed in primary care in DPHA, Wales. Health professionals in general practice are in need of, and are in favour of, up-to-date training on all aspects of chlamydial identification and management in primary care. Attention needs to be focused upon resources and the paucity of GUM services and their access within the DPHA area.

Chlamydia Infections↗

Practice patterns of family physicians in practice-based research networks: a report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Pratice Network.

BACKGROUND: Practice-based research networks are growing and undertaking larger and more complex studies to inform the clinical practice of family physicians. We describe a study that compares clinical behaviors of physicians in the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN), a large national practice-based research network, with those from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). METHODS: A survey, replicating NAMCS, was conducted among 129 family physician members of ASPN. Nested logistic regression was used to determine which services could predict ASPN membership after adjustment for common and easily observed patient and physician characteristics. RESULTS: Of 20 specific patient services, only 4 were predictive of membership in ASPN. Of these 4, 2 were screening or diagnostic services; ASPN physicians were 1.18 times more likely to obtain a blood pressure measurement and 0.60 times as likely to order a culture for streptococcal pharyngitis. ASPN physicians were 2.30 times more likely to provide family planning counseling and 1.66 times more likely to provide smoking cessation counseling after adjusting for patient smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there are minimal differences in the practice patterns of family physicians participating in a large national practice-based research network and those included in the probability sample of NAMCS. Additional work is needed to examine further those characteristics of the phenomena observed in practice-based research network research that might affect generalizability of results to the larger community of practicing family physicians.

Community Networks↗

Research output of Australian general practice: a comparison with medicine, surgery and public health.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the productivity of Australian general practice in terms of research publications with the productivity of other medical disciplines. DESIGN: A survey of Australian general practice, medicine, surgery and public health publications carried out by manual searching of specific journals and an electronic search of the US National Library of Medicine's "PubMed" database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of original research publications by Australian general practitioners, physicians, surgeons and public health physicians during 1999; the relative publication rate of Australian general practice, medicine, surgery and public health over the period 1990-1999. RESULTS: Of original research articles published in 1999, GPs authored 65% (17/26) in Australian Family Physician and 3% (3/90) in the Medical Journal of Australia; physicians published 4% and 37%, respectively. The electronic search identified 54 research articles relating to Australian general practice published in 1999 in 21 different journals, only two of which were primary care journals. Over the period 1990-1999, there was a publication rate of one general practice [discipline] article per 1000 GPs in practice per year. Corresponding rates for medicine, surgery and public health were 105/1000, 61/1000 and 148/1000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable disparity between the level of research output of general practice and that of the disciplines of medicine, surgery and public health. If we are to have effective general practice research, we urgently need to develop research skills, a supportive infrastructure and a culture that nurtures research.

Australia↗

Practice patterns of rural Texas physicians trained in a full-service family practice residency program.

The family practice residency program of John Peter Smith Hospital (JPSH) emphasizes "full-service" training to enable its graduates to provide a wide range of services to underserved areas, particularly rural communities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the practice patterns of rural JPSH family practice graduates. Of 180 identified JPSH family practice residency graduates who currently practice in rural Texas, 102 (57%) responded to a postcard survey. Data were analyzed by decade of graduation. Recent graduates were more likely to provide obstetrical care than were older graduates. The proportion of graduates providing obstetrical care at some time during their careers was similar. Recent graduates were more likely to perform office-based procedures such as colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Rural JPSH family practice graduates provided more obstetrical care, critical care, and office-based procedures than did other rural members of the American Academy of Family Physicians. Practice patterns of JPSH family practice graduates have changed little over the past 30 years, except that recent graduates do more obstetrics and perform more endoscopies. These data show that the skills and knowledge of full-service family physicians are still needed in rural Texas.

Clinical Competence↗

An examination of practice referral rates in relation to practice structure, patient demography and case mix.

This paper examines the variation in practice referral rates from 53 practices over a twelve-month period. Data from the Second National Morbidity Study were used in relation to practice structure; age, sex and Social Class composition of the patient population; and the case mix by practice. The results show that the age of the patient is an important determinant of the probability of referral, whereas Social Class has little influence. Analysis of the practice-based data showed that practices were highly concordant in their referral activity across sex and age (greater or less than 45 years), sex and Social Class (manual or non-manual), and across chapters of the disease classification. This degree of concordance points to characteristics of the practices rather than patients, and their problems as the main source of variation in practice referral behaviour.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices: a study from the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet).

BACKGROUND: We examined the pharmacologic management and follow-up of adults with newly diagnosed depression, and the use of antidepressants among patients not diagnosed with depression in primary care practice. A total of 389 physicians in 39 practices in the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet), a national network of primary care physicians provided data for the study. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study for the year 1996 using demographic, contact, diagnosis, and prescription data available in the December 1997 PPRNet database. We identified patients with new diagnoses of depression from the problem lists in the electronic medical record. Psychopharmacologic agents prescribed within 5 days of the diagnosis, follow-up contacts within 6 months of the diagnosis, and diagnoses of patients prescribed antidepressants without a new diagnosis of depression were also identified. We performed descriptive analyses for all practices and for individual practices. RESULTS: During 1996, there were 149,327 active adult patients in the 39 participating practices. Of the 131,141 patients without a history of depression or antidepressant prescription, 2103 (1.6%) had a new diagnosis of depression in 1996. Incidence among the 39 practices ranged from 0.4% to 4.0%. Forty-nine percent of the newly diagnosed patients received an antidepressant prescription within 5 days of diagnosis; 81% of the prescriptions were for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Ninety percent of the patients prescribed antidepressants had at least one contact in the 6 months after diagnosis (mean = 5.3 contacts). One third of the patients who had not begun antidepressants within 5 days of their diagnoses started taking one by the end of 1996. Among the 149,327 active patients, 6.3% received a prescription for an antidepressant in 1996. More than 40% of these patients had never been diagnosed with depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the high prevalence and wide interpractice variations of diagnosing depression and prescribing antidepressants in primary care. Follow-up of patients newly diagnosed with depression was common and consistent with published guidelines. Opportunities for increased detection and treatment of depression exist in approximately half of the study practices.

Adolescent↗

What would attract general practice trainees into rural practice in New Zealand?

AIM: The shortage of rural doctors is acknowledged worldwide. This study aimed to identify incentives that would attract doctors into rural practice in New Zealand. METHODS: Registrars and seminar attendees of the General Practice Vocational Training Programme in 2000 and 2001 were surveyed using focus groups and subsequent questionnaire to find what conditions might attract young general practitioners (GPs) into rural practice in New Zealand. Themes identified included lifestyle, family issues, on-call work, financial incentives, career opportunities, training, and study leave/holidays. RESULTS: Of the 140 questionnaires sent out, 91 were returned (65% response rate). Twenty nine per cent of respondents said they were unlikely to go into rural practice, despite a comprehensive incentive scheme; 8% said they would go into rural practice even if no incentive scheme were offered. The remaining 63% were more likely to go into rural practice if an incentive scheme were offered. The incentives most favoured were: reduction in on-call work; guaranteed time out of the practice; and consideration of options for partners and children. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that two thirds of trainee GPs might consider going into rural practice if an appropriate incentive scheme were available.

Career Choice↗

Towards accurate prescribing analysis in general practice: accounting for the effects of practice demography.

The object of this study was to develop a more accurate method of analysing prescribing patterns in general practice than is currently provided by prescribing analysis and cost (PACT) data. In particular it was hoped to be able to develop a system to predict accurately both the prescribing activity related to practice population age-sex distributions, and the related prescribing activity in the individual therapeutic groups used in PACT reports. Data from the Vamp research data bank were combined with mean prescription costs from the Prescription Pricing Authority and the patient age-sex profile of each practice. The estimated cost of prescribing for each practice in each therapeutic group was derived, and subsequently compared with the PACT data. Large variations were found between predicted patterns and PACT 'averages' for both overall costs, and within therapeutic groups. This was most noticeable where a practice's age-sex profile varied markedly from the family health services authority mean age-sex distribution. Comparison of data for the different therapeutic groups showed the largest differential between the predicted patterns and PACT averages to be in the drugs for the cardiovascular system. Audit requires a baseline against which to measure, change and re-evaluate performance and this system of analysis provides a more accurate baseline against which to measure a practice's prescribing habits. Subsequent evaluation will provide a judgement of the quality of that prescribing. A practice population's age-sex structure is such a fundamental determinant of the practice's prescribing patterns that some modification of the current PACT weighting system should be undertaken so as to reflect more accurately average prescribing in different age groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Functions performed by level of practice of registered dietitian members of the diabetes care and education dietetic practice group.

The purpose of this study was to examine current professional practices of registered dietitians (RDs) in the Diabetes Care and Education dietetic practice group (DPG), analyzed by levels of practice: entry-level, specialty-practice, or advanced-level. The results of the Diabetes Care and Education DPG 2002-2003 membership survey were used for this study. The study was limited to RD members of the Diabetes Care and Education DPG who completed the membership survey in its entirety. Frequency distributions, chi2, Fisher exact test, and cluster analysis were performed with a prior alpha set at .10. Sixty-one (5.0%) RDs were functioning as an entry-level practitioner, 851 (69.1%) were functioning as a specialty-practice practitioner, and 320 (25.1%) as an advanced-level practitioner. Significantly more advanced-level practitioners were performing more tasks compared with entry-level practitioners. Entry-level RDs performed a mean of 2.4 functions, specialty-practice practitioners performed 7.7, and advanced-level practitioners performed 11.6 functions. The results of this survey further delineated that RDs function at various levels of practice and that credentials for RDs increased as level of practice advanced.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Managing epilepsy in general practice: the dissemination and uptake of a free audit package, and collated results from 12 practices in England and Wales.

This study aimed to assess the uptake and use by general practitioners of a free epilepsy audit protocol, and describe the care provided by practices which returned completed audits. A protocol for epilepsy audit in general practice was designed and described in the medical press. Practices were invited to reply. Responders were provided with the protocol. A total of 215 practices responded to the articles in the press. Questionnaires asking how they had used the audit protocol were sent to them 18 months later. One hundred and seventy (79%) of the 215 responding practices returned the questionnaires. Forty-seven (28%) had collected some or all of the data. Twenty-two (13%) submitted data of which 12 (7%) matched the original protocol. Aggregated list sizes for these 12 practices was 75689 and 502 (0.66%) patients were being treated. Of these, 60% were seizure free and 11% were having more than one seizure per month. Seventy-one were receiving monotherapy and only two patients were taking more than three drugs. Eighty-eight per cent of patients still having seizures had been seen by their GP for their epilepsy in the last 12 months. In 18% of cases, information on epilepsy lifestyle issues had been given and noted. Offering a free epilepsy audit package can stimulate interest amongst practices in the topic and resulted in 13% collecting and submitting their data for analysis. Practices reported a higher prevalence for epilepsy (0.66%) than in previous studies. The majority of patients with active epilepsy (88%) had been seen by a general practitioner in the last 12 months. Most (71%) were receiving monotherapy, but recording of seizure frequency and provision of information about epilepsy was low.

Anticonvulsants↗

Nursing's contribution to general practice: general practitioners' and practice nurses' views.

This study was instigated by the paucity of knowledge relating to the work of nurses employed by general practitioners in Australia and the phenomenal development of the practice nurse role in the United Kingdom. A mailed survey of general practitioners and practice nurses within one Division of General Practice in South-East Queensland, sought, among other things, their views about the current and potential contribution of nursing to general practice. Eighty-four out of 164 (51%) general practitioners and 37 out of 67 (55%) practice nurses responded to the survey. Results indicated that both general practitioners and practice nurses appreciated the value of nursing services in general practice and would sanction the employment of more nurses especially for the purpose of preventive care. The majority of nurses were agreeable to the notion that the nurse's role could, and should, be expanded to include autonomous functioning while most of the doctors were amenable to some extension of nursing practice but reticent or opposed to any independent interventions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice.

Practice development activity occupies an ambiguous position in relation to both clinical practice and research. In practice, it is seen at times as an added extra to normal work despite arguably being an inherent part of professional practice. In research, it fails to demonstrate the rigour of being generalisable because of its explicit location in a specific care environment. The study reported in this paper explored the implications of this ambiguity for practitioners who seek to develop health care practice. Ten focus groups were held with health care researchers and practitioners concerning the processes of developing practice in the North East of England. The results demonstrate how people manage themselves and the uncertainty that surrounds the use of research in clinical practice. The paper argues for an appreciation of reflexive forms of research, such as action and practitioner research, which do not disassociate research and practice and in which practitioners have a role in knowledge creation as well as knowledge implementation.

Culture↗

Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Improving the sensitivity of general practice to patients' needs demands a good understanding of patients' expectations and priorities in care provision. Insight into differences in expectations of patients in different cultures and health care systems may support decision-making on desirable models for care provision in general practice. An international study was conducted to determine priorities of patients in general practice care: which views do patients in different countries have in common and which views differ? METHODS: Written surveys in general practices in the UK, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands, Germany, Portugal and Israel were performed. Samples of patients from at least 12 practices per country, stratified according to area and type of practice, were included. Patients rated the importance of 38 different aspects of general practice care, selected on the basis of literature analysis, qualitative studies and consensus discussions. Rankings between countries were compared. RESULTS: A total number of 3540 patients (response rate on average 55%) completed the questionnaire. Patients in different countries had many opinions in common. Aspects that got the highest ranking were: getting enough time during the consultation; quick services in case of emergencies; confidentiality of information on patients; telling patients all they want to know about their illness; making patients feel free to talk about their problems; GPs going to courses regularly; and offering preventive services. However, differences between opinions of patients in different countries were also found for some of the selected aspects. A confounding effect of patients' characteristics may have played a role in these differences. DISCUSSION: The study provides information on what patients expect of and value in general practice care. It shows that patients in different cultures and health care systems may have different views on some aspects of care, but most of all that they have many views in common, particularly as far as doctor-patient communication and accessibility of services are concerned.

Adult↗

The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.

PURPOSE: To develop a conceptual tool for the systematic development of cancer treatment practice guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The guidelines development tool, the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, was derived from observing an evidence-based practice guidelines initiative at a comprehensive cancer center in Ontario, Canada, and from a literature review that uncovered barriers to guidelines development and implementation. Based on the literature findings and direct observations of how clinicians struggled with evidence-based guidelines development, we evolved a framework to incorporate clinical and administrative factors (eg, costs) into evidence-based guidelines. Use of the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle is illustrated with a clinical example (the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in good-risk, node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients). RESULTS: The result is the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, which consists of eight sequential steps, from topic selection to policy formulation. Independent validation of guidelines is included. The cycle products are the evidence-based recommendation, the practice guideline, and the practice policy. The main features of the cycle are emphasis on scientific evidence, acknowledgment of the roles of clinical experience and nonclinical (administrative) factors through consensus, and explicit separation of clinical and cost considerations in guidelines development. Twenty guidelines are currently in development. CONCLUSION: Attention to the barriers of guidelines development and the sociocultural nature of clinical practice, and respect for clinical experience, can lead to improved strategies for guidelines development.

Cancer Care Facilities↗

Testing assumptions of deliberate practice theory, relevance, effort, and inherent enjoyment of practice on a novel task.

This study examined three assumptions of the theory of deliberate practice: that deliberate practice is perceived as relevant for improving performance and that it requires effort, but that it is not perceived as being inherently enjoyable. Of particular interest was the assumption of inherent enjoyment of practice since that has been questioned in previous research. 30 undergraduate and graduate students combined practiced a maze memorization and recall task and rated relevance of practice for improving recall, the practice effort, and inherent enjoyment of practice. The findings were consistent with three assumptions, but also suggested that perceptions about relevance, effort, and inherent enjoyment of practice may change with increasing experience and performance.

Adult↗

Practice analysis survey: revalidation of advanced clinical practice in orthopaedic physical therapy.

The first orthopaedic physical therapy practice analysis survey was completed in 1983. Another practice analysis survey was conducted in 1993 to identify the advance practice of clinicians who practice in orthopaedic physical therapy settings. Since 10 years elapsed, a new practice analysis study was conducted to identify the practice of orthopaedic clinical specialists. The purpose of this report is to describe the results of this survey. Orthopaedic physical therapists, both specialists and nonspecialists, participated in group interviews, subject matter expert meetings, and a national practice survey to delineate important knowledges and responsibilities. The survey was.sent to a stratified convenience sample of 1,000 orthopaedic physical therapists, of which 325 were orthopaedic clinical specialists. The three-part survey contained 180 items. A total of 420 respondents, of which 241 were orthopaedic clinical specialists, rated the importance and application level for the items. The results of this study provide evidence for a core body of knowledge required by clinicians practicing with advanced skills in orthopaedic physical therapy and create the framework for the Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Specialty Exam.

Clinical Competence↗

Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy.

STUDY DESIGN: Nonexperimental descriptive research design. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of use and perceived level of importance of professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas by physical therapists practicing in primary contact care settings and to compare these data to similar data from physical therapists practicing in nonprimary contact care settings. BACKGROUND: Physical therapy services have moved toward a primary contact model of practice in response to changes in the health care delivery system. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of primary contact physical therapy. However, a practice analysis has not been performed to define the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. METHODS AND MEASURES: A sample of 212 physical therapists practicing as primary contact providers in the military and civilian sectors, and a comparison group of 250 physical therapists not practicing as primary contact providers were surveyed. A Delphi technique was used to develop the survey instrument, which was pretested by a pilot group. The final survey instrument consisted of 171 items. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to examine significant differences among the 3 groups (P<.001). RESULTS: Of the 212 surveys mailed to the primary contact group, 119 (56.1%) responses were received (82 military physical therapists and 37 civilian physical therapists). Of the 250 surveys mailed to the comparison group, 103 (41.2%) responses were received. There were numerous significant differences among the 3 groups in professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas, most notably in the areas of selecting and ordering of imaging procedures, identifying signs and symptoms of nonmusculoskeletal conditions, establishing physical therapy diagnoses, and prescribing over-the-counter medications. CONCLUSION: The study describes the clinical practice of physical therapists functioning in the role of primary contact providers or as members of a diverse team of health care professionals in primary care, which may provide curricular direction to professional, postprofessional, and clinical residency or fellowship-based educational settings.

Adult↗

Establishing a practice based primary care research network. The University Family Practice Network in South Australia.

BACKGROUND: Practice based research networks enable the study of primary care problems in a primary care setting. To be successful, our experience indicates that a network will need to incorporate a number of key components. In South Australia, a University Family Practice Network has been established to undertake primary health care research and teaching and to contribute to the general practice workforce. The University Family Practice Network is composed of five practices and is managed jointly by the Department of General Practice, Adelaide University and the South Australian Centre for Rural and Remote Health, Adelaide University and the University of South Australia. OBJECTIVE: This article details the successful establishment of the University Family Practice Network in the hope of providing a model for other universities who may be interested in setting up a practice based research network. DISCUSSION: The characteristics of this network include fractional academic positions for general practitioners, computerised medical records, location in rural and urban sites, regular meetings and the appointment of a research fellow. A number of benefits have arisen since the network's establishment that will assist its future development and sustainability. These include collocation with allied health services, development of local expertise and workforce support.

Australia↗