Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sound Localization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1971

Rapid acquisition of an auditory localization discrimination by rats.

Acquisition of a sound localization discrimination by rats was investigated. Two loudspeakers were located outside an experimental enclosure containing two levers and a dipper feeder. In the same-side condition, responses on the lever nearest the sound-producing speaker were reinforced. Animals in this condition acquired the discrimination rapidly, generally within the first session. In the opposite-side condition, responses on the lever furthest from the sound-producing speaker were reinforced. Acquisition for animals in this condition began below the chance level (50% correct responses) and took on the order of 10 sessions to approach the final, high level. The course of acquisition in both cases appeared to depend upon an initial tendency of rats to respond on the lever nearest the source of sound in this situation. The rise-decay time of the 4-kHz tone burst signal clearly affected the performance level reached. It did not, however, affect the rate at which the discrimination was acquired.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

A developmental look at an auditory illusion: the precedence effect.

Infants aged 2 and 6 months were tested with the precedence effect, an auditory phenomenon involving sound localization. Each infant was tested with two types of stimuli: sound from a single loudspeaker and precedence-effect sounds produced by the same sound put through two loudspeakers, with one output leading the other by 7 msec. Older infants localized precedence-effect stimuli as they did single-source stimuli, indicating that they perceived this phenomenon as expected. Two-month-olds turned their heads toward single-source sounds, but did not localize precedence-effect sounds, suggesting that that more difficult perceptual task had not been achieved at this age. In general, head-turning toward sound proved far more difficult to elicit in younger infants. A click train was ineffective, but a tape-recorded human voice elicited above-chance low-level turning. The developmental changes in auditory behavior are discussed in terms of the rapid growth of the auditory cortex.

Arousal↗
PubMed1989

Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus.

Auditory stimulus blocks were presented to 12 reading subjects. Each block consisted of 2 types, standard (P = 90%) and deviant stimuli (P = 10%), delivered in a random order. The only difference between these stimuli was their spatial location of origin. The subject always heard the standards as coming straight in front and the deviants from an angle of either 10, 45, or 90 degrees to the right of the standards. The spatial locations were produced via earphones by introducing for low-frequency (600 Hz) tones an interaural phase difference and for high-frequency (3000 Hz) tones an interaural intensity difference. Standard and deviant stimuli were also delivered in more natural, free-field, conditions via differently positioned loudspeakers. The deviant tones elicited an event-related brain potential component called the mismatch negativity (MMN), followed by a P3a component. Thus changes in spatial location of an auditory stimulus produced by following either one of the two main principles of human sound localization elicited the MMN. Consequently, it was concluded that the spatial location of a sound source is coded in the hypothesized neuronal stimulus traces reflected by the MMN and, further, that a change in this location is automatically detected by the brain by means of the MMN generator process.

Adult↗