Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin among high-risk patients in usual clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatment with statins in high risk patients in routine clinical practice are needed. The objective of the present study was to estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin or simvastatin among high-risk patients as treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 79 years with coronary heart disease (CHD) or equivalent who initiated treatment with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin were included. Primary outcome variables were the percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), achievement of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) LDL-C goal, treatment costs, and cost-effectiveness. Regression models were used to adjust outcome measures for age, sex, CHD, baseline LDL-C, and therapy duration. A decision analytic model was used to assess incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Of the 775 eligible patients, rosuvastatin patients had higher baseline LDL-C levels (156 mg/dL vs 142 mg/dL or 137 mg/dL, respectively) compared with atorvastatin or simvastatin. Adjusted for baseline factors, percent LDL-C reduction was significantly greater with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin or simvastatin (37% vs 28% or 27%, respectively; P <.05). The estimated percentage of patients attaining NCEP ATP III goal was higher (P <.05) for rosuvastatin (69.7%) compared with atorvastatin (54.8%) or simvastatin (51.2%), adjusted for baseline characteristics. Rosuvastatin patients also had the lowest annualized treatment costs (934dollars vs 1050 dollars or 1545 dollars for atorvastatin or simvastatin). Rosuvastatin was more effective and less costly than atorvastatin and at current branded and generic prices of simvastatin. A 60% to 68% discount from simvastatin branded price was needed to achieve equivalent cost-effectiveness as rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, rosuvastatin is more effective and cost-effective in lowering LDL-C and in attainment of ATP III LDL-C goals compared with atorvastatin or simvastatin among high-risk patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia with simvastatin. New Zealand multicentre evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of simvastatin in a large patient cohort. DESIGN: In an open multicentre study, after a four week placebo phase, patients were treated with simvastatin for 24 weeks; a subgroup continued therapy for a further 24 weeks. Efficacy of simvastatin (a) with prolonged use over three years, and (b) in combination with bezafibrate was assessed in an open single site study. SETTING: Lipid or cardiology specialist hospital outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: For the open multicentre study, 228 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol level greater than 6.5 mmol/L) were recruited, of whom 224 met entry criteria and completed the study. Forty-seven of these patients continued therapy for one year. In the open single site study, 22 patients (with low density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol levels greater than 4.3 mmol/L) participated in studies of long term use (n = 9) or of combined therapy (n = 13). INTERVENTION: Therapy in the open multicentre study began with 10 mg of simvastatin per day, doubling to 20 mg after six weeks and then 40 mg after 12 weeks of therapy if total cholesterol levels persisted above 5.2 mmol/L. In the study of long term use, simvastatin (40 mg daily) was taken continuously over three years. In the study of combination therapy, bezafibrate (600 mg daily) was taken in addition to simvastatin (40 mg daily) for 10 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. RESULTS: In the multicentre study, total plasma cholesterol levels were reduced by 32.8% from 9.11 +/- 1.84 (in mmol/L, mean +/- SD) to 6.12 +/- 1.25 (P less than 0.001), and LDL cholesterol levels by 41.4% from 6.90 +/- 1.92 to 4.04 +/- 0.31 (P less than 0.001). The effect of therapy was sustained in those patients continuing therapy to 48 weeks. The study of long term use found no significant attenuation of effect over three years of monotherapy. Combined simvastatin/bezafibrate therapy reduced the LDL cholesterol concentration by a further 19.9% (P less than 0.001) from levels achieved on simvastatin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin is an effective, well tolerated lipid lowering drug, without significant attenuation of effect with prolonged use. Simvastatin plus bezafibrate appears to be a potentially useful drug combination.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Drug therapy for hypercholesterolaemia has remained controversial mainly because of insufficient clinical trial evidence for improved survival. The present trial was designed to evaluate the effect of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin on mortality and morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). 4444 patients with angina pectoris or previous myocardial infarction and serum cholesterol 5.5-8.0 mmol/L on a lipid-lowering diet were randomised to double-blind treatment with simvastatin or placebo. Over the 5.4 years median follow-up period, simvastatin produced mean changes in total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol of -25%, -35%, and +8%, respectively, with few adverse effects. 256 patients (12%) in the placebo group died, compared with 182 (8%) in the simvastatin group. The relative risk of death in the simvastatin group was 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.85, p = 0.0003). The 6-year probabilities of survival in the placebo and simvastatin groups were 87.6% and 91.3%, respectively. There were 189 coronary deaths in the placebo group and 111 in the simvastatin group (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73), while noncardiovascular causes accounted for 49 and 46 deaths, respectively. 622 patients (28%) in the placebo group and 431 (19%) in the simvastatin group had one or more major coronary events. The relative risk was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.75, p < 0.00001), and the respective probabilities of escaping such events were 70.5% and 79.6%. This risk was also significantly reduced in subgroups consisting of women and patients of both sexes aged 60 or more. Other benefits of treatment included a 37% reduction (p < 0.00001) in the risk of undergoing myocardial revascularisation procedures. This study shows that long-term treatment with simvastatin is safe and improves survival in CHD patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with simvastatin.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate LDL cholesterol-lowering efficacy, overall safety, and tolerability and the influence on growth and pubertal development of simvastatin in a large cohort of boys and girls with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 173 heFH children (98 boys and 75 girls) were included in this study. After a 4-week diet/placebo run-in period, children with heFH were randomized to either simvastatin or placebo in a ratio of 3:2. Simvastatin was started at 10 mg/d and titrated at 8-week intervals to 20 and then 40 mg/d. During a 24-week extension period, the patients continued to receive simvastatin (40 mg) or placebo according to their assignment. After 48 weeks of simvastatin therapy, there were significant reductions of LDL cholesterol (-41%), total cholesterol (-31%), apolipoprotein B (-34%), VLDL cholesterol (-21%), and triglyceride (-9%) levels. HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels were increased by 3.3% and 10.4%, respectively (not significant). No safety issues became evident. Except for small decreases in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate compared with placebo, there were no significant changes from baseline in adrenal, gonadal, and pituitary hormones in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin significantly reduced LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride, VLDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels and was well tolerated in children with heFH. There was no evidence of any adverse effect of simvastatin on growth and pubertal development. Therefore, simvastatin at doses up to 40 mg is a well-tolerated and effective therapy for heFH children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of the efficacy of simvastatin and standard fibrate therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia.

Five multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in France to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily simvastatin treatment (10-40 mg/day) with conventional therapy with gemfibrozil 900 mg/day, ciprofibrate 100 mg/day, bezafibrate 400 mg/day, and fenofibrate 300 or 400 mg/day in a total of 800 patients with hypercholesterolemia. Simvastatin was associated with statistically significantly greater (p < or = 0.01) mean percent reductions in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol compared with each of the five fibrate regimens, even when administered at its recommended starting dose of 10 mg/day. Furthermore, approximately 90% of patients treated once daily with simvastatin experienced an at least 20% decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol compared with only 36 to 68% of patients treated with the individual fibrate agents (p < or = 0.05). The effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol did not differ as a function of the baseline plasma concentrations of total cholesterol or triglycerides. In contrast, the effectiveness of fibrate therapy in lowering plasma LDL cholesterol levels was significantly diminished (p < or = 0.05) among patients with triglyceride concentrations > 1.7 mmol/l. Plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were increased by approximately 10% after treatment with simvastatin or the fibrates. Although fibrate therapy was more effective overall in lowering plasma triglyceride levels, the effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing plasma triglyceride levels was generally 2- to 4-fold greater in patients with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels > or = 2.3 mmol/l than in those with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels < 2.3 mmol/l. The results of these studies confirm the superiority of simvastatin to standard fibrate therapy in reducing plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol. They further indicate that once-daily treatment with simvastatin is effective in patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia or hypercholesterolemia associated with elevated triglyceride levels.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Differential effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I are consistent across hypercholesterolemic patient subgroups.

BACKGROUND: In addition to lowering plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), statins also raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). HYPOTHESIS: Recent studies have shown that treatment with simvastatin results in larger increases in HDL-C than those seen with atorvastatin. The results of three clinical studies are analyzed, comparing the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) in the total cohort and in several subgroups of hypercholesterolemic patients. The three studies were all multicenter, randomized clinical trials that included simvastatin (20-80 mg) and atorvastatin (10-80 mg) treatment arms. The subgroup analyses performed were gender; age (< 65 and > or = 65 years); baseline HDL-C (male: < 40 or > or = 40 mg/dl; female: < 45 or > or = 45 mg/dl), baseline LDL-C (< 160 or > or = 160 mg/dl), and baseline triglycerides (< 200 or > or = 200 mg/dl). RESULTS: Both drugs produced similar increases in HDL-C levels at low doses; however, at higher drug doses (40 and 80 mg), HDL-C showed a significantly greater increase with simvastatin than with atorvastatin (p < 0.05 to < 0.001). Therefore, while HDL-C remained consistently elevated across all doses of simvastatin, there appeared to be a pattern of decreasing HDL-C with an increasing dose of atorvastatin. A similar negative dose response pattern was also observed with apo A-I in atorvastatin-treated patients, suggesting a reduction in the number of circulating HDL particles at higher doses. Both drugs reduced LDL-C and triglycerides in a dose-dependent fashion, with atorvastatin showing slightly greater effects. The differential effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on HDL-C and apo A-I were observed for both the whole study cohorts and all subgroups examined; thus, no consistent treatment-by-subgroup interactions were observed. CONCLUSION: The data presented show that, across different hypercholesterolemic patient subgroups, simvastatin increases HDL-C and apo A-I more than atorvastatin at higher doses, with evidence of a negative dose response effect on HDL-C and apo A-I with atorvastatin, but not simvastatin.

Apolipoprotein A-I↗
PubMed2004

Changes in serum interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome and their responses to simvastatin.

The role of inflammation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the mechanism by which statin treats ACS is explored. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were measured in 50 patients with ACS [including 30 cases with unstable angina (UA) and 20 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)], 34 patients with stable angina (SA), and 30 controls. Patients in the ACS group were randomly assigned to a simvastatin group (including a simvastatin AMI subgroup, n = 11 and a simvastatin UA subgroup, n = 14) and a routine group (including a routine AMI subgroup, n = 9 and a routine UA subgroup, n = 16). The simvastatin group was given simvastatin 20mg/day and the routine group a placebo. After a 3-week follow-up, serum hs-CRP, IL-6 levels, and serum lipid concentrations were measured again. Both serum IL-6 and hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in the ACS group (including the UA and AMI subgroups) than in the SA and control groups (P < 0.001). After 3 weeks of treatment with simvastatin, the serum IL-6, hs-CRP, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were decreased significantly in the simvastatin group (P < 0.001), but no significant changes were observed in the routine group. No relationship was observed between the rate of decrease of serum IL-6 or hs-CRP and serum lipids levels. The hs-CRP level showed a significant correlation with IL-6 by Spearman's rank correlation analysis (P < 0.01). Inflammation plays an important role in the initiation of ACS. Simvastatin possesses an anti-inflammatory effect, independent of its lipid-lowering action, which may play an important role in the early treatment of ACS.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase, apoprotein-B and LDL receptor gene expression by the hypocholesterolemic drugs simvastatin and ciprofibrate in Hep G2, human and rat hepatocytes.

The comparative effects of simvastatin (a competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase) and ciprofibrate (another inhibitor of cholesterogenesis) on the incorporation of [14C]acetate and [3H]mevalonate into cholesterol HMG-CoA reductase activity, apo-B synthesis, LDL receptor, and their corresponding mRNAs, have been studied in the human hepatoma cell line Hep G2 and in human and rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Incubation of Hep G2 with simvastatin (0.01-1.5 microM) or ciprofibrate (25-100 microM) produced not only a marked inhibition of cholesterogenesis from [14C]acetate but also from [3H]mevalonate, an intermediate downstream of the HMG-CoA reductase reaction. However, in human and rat hepatocytes, cultured in similar conditions, simvastatin inhibited only the cholesterol synthesis from [14C]acetate, as expected. HMG-CoA reductase activity was greatly induced in Hep G2 and rat hepatocytes after incubation with simvastatin (up to 400% of controls), but not with ciprofibrate. Increased enzyme activity was accompanied by a higher cell content of reductase mRNA. Apo-B concentration in the medium of Hep G2 cells was 31% lower after 31 h incubation with simvastatin than in controls. However, neither simvastatin nor ciprofibrate modified the synthesis rate of apo-B or its mRNA level. Both LDL-receptor and its mRNA levels were raised by simvastatin at concentrations inhibiting cholesterol synthesis. Our data show that, in this human hepatoma cell line, HMG-CoA reductase competitive inhibition by simvastatin triggers a coordinate regulation of the expression of genes coding for reductase and LDL receptor but not for apo-B. Ciprofibrate, though efficient in inhibiting cholesterogenesis, did not induce the same regulatory reactions. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown.

Acetates↗
PubMed1993

Simvastatin-induced decrease in the transfer of cholesterol esters from high density lipoproteins to very low and low density lipoproteins in normolipidemic subjects.

Hyperlipidemic patients often have an accelerated esterified cholesterol transfer (ECT) from high density lipoproteins (HDL) to very low (VLDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL). We investigated the effect of simvastatin on ECT in twelve normolipidemic subjects. After 6 weeks of simvastatin administration, ECT was decreased by 23%. To determine the mechanism of action of simvastatin, we measured ECT in different recombination experiments, using an isotopic assay in which the transfer of labelled EC from HDL to VLDL/LDL was determined. When HDL of the treated subjects were incubated with VLDL/LDL and CETP fractions isolated from control plasma, no effect of simvastatin was observed, indicating that the drug did not alter the HDL-dependent ECT. This might be expected since simvastatin induced only minor modifications of HDL structure. When HDL and VLDL/LDL of control plasma were incubated with CETP fractions of the treated subjects, a clear reduction of ECT occurred after simvastatin administration. The decrease of plasma transfer activity was correlated to that of CETP concentration and accounted for the simvastatin-induced lowering of ECT. The diminution of plasma CETP was correlated to that of the apo B-containing lipoproteins concentration. This finding confirms previous reports suggesting a relationship between LDL level and CETP activity. In conclusion, our work shows that simvastatin administration results in a decrease of ECT and that this effect occurs through a lowering of plasma CETP activity.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Comparative effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on cholesterol synthesis in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

The effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on cholesterol biosynthesis were compared in 26 hypercholesterolemic patients who were randomly allocated to either simvastatin or pravastatin treatment (20 mg once daily) for 6 weeks in a crossover trial. Serum total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lathosterol (latho) concentrations and lathosterol/cholesterol (latho/chol) ratios (the latter two are considered as reliable indices of whole body cholesterol synthesis) were evaluated at the beginning and end of each therapeutic sequence. Reductions in TC and LDL-C were more pronounced (P < 0.001) with simvastatin (TC = -28.0%, LDL-C = -35.6%) than with pravastatin (TC = -19.6%, LDL-C = -25.2%). These results were associated with concomitant decreases in both latho concentrations (-59.0% with simvastatin and -37.0% with pravastatin) and latho/chol ratios (-43.0% with simvastatin and -20.3% with pravastatin). Simvastatin resulted in more marked diminutions of latho concentrations (P < 0.01) and latho/chol ratios (P < 0.05) than pravastatin. These results suggest that the better efficacy of simvastatin on serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol might result in part from a greater inhibitory action of simvastatin on cholesterol synthesis compared with that of pravastatin.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effect of simvastatin in familial hypercholesterolemia on the affinity of electronegative low-density lipoprotein subfractions to the low-density lipoprotein receptor.

The effect of simvastatin therapy on the biologic characteristics of the electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) was studied. Total LDL, isolated from FH plasma at 0, 3 and 6 months of simvastatin treatment, was subfractionated into electropositive LDL (LDL[+]) and electronegative LDL (LDL[-]) by anion exchange chromatography. LDL isolated from healthy normolipemic (NL) subjects was used as a control. The LDL(-) proportion was twofold higher in patients with FH than in NL subjects (17.6 +/- 1.6% vs 7.8 +/- 1.5%, respectively; p <0.05) and was progressively reduced by simvastatin therapy (15.7 +/- 1.6% at 3 months; 13.8 +/- 2.5% at 6 months; p <0.05). Both LDL subfractions from patients with FH had a higher relative cholesterol content and decreased apolipoprotein B and triglycerides than NL subfractions. Simvastatin progressively induced changes in lipid content of both LDL subfractions in patients with FH, and lipid composition was closer to these subfractions in NL subjects after 6 months of therapy. Binding displacement experiments in human fibroblasts demonstrated that LDL(-) from both groups of subjects had a lower affinity of binding to the LDL receptor that LDL(+). In addition, LDL(+) in patients with FH presented an intermediate binding affinity between LDL(-) and LDL(+) in NL subjects. Simvastatin-induced changes in LDL composition were accompanied by a progressive increase in affinity of LDL(+) and LDL(-) in patients with FH. After 6 months of therapy, LDL(+) in FH had an affinity similar to that of LDL(+) in NL subjects. The LDL(-)-induced release of chemokines interleukin-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 from cultured endothelial cells was twofold higher compared with that of LDL(+). No difference in chemokine release between patients with FH and NL subjects or the effect of simvastatin were observed. We conclude that simvastatin therapy was able to modify LDL subfraction composition in subjects with FH and increase their affinity to the LDL receptor. This improvement could contribute to the observed reduction in LDL(-) proportion induced by simvastatin.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The effects of simvastatin, losartan, and combined therapy on soluble CD40 ligand in hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients.

The proinflammatory mediator CD40 ligand plays an important role in atherogenesis. Biological mechanisms underlying statin and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker therapies differ. Therefore, we compared the effects of these therapies either alone or in combination on plasma soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial with three treatment arms (each 2 months) and two washout periods (each 2 months). Forty-seven hypertensive, hypercholesterolemic patients were given simvastatin 20mg and placebo, simvastatin 20mg and losartan 100mg, or losartan 100mg and placebo daily during each 2 month treatment period. Simvastatin alone did not significantly reduce sCD40L levels relative to baseline measurements when the entire cohort was analyzed. However, simvastatin significantly reduced sCD40L levels from 5.10+/-0.34 to 3.07+/-0.43ng/ml (P=0.002) in a subgroup of 18 patients with high baseline sCD40L levels >2.95ng/ml. Combined therapy or losartan alone significantly decreased plasma sCD40L levels relative to baseline measurements by 14+/-7% (P=0.001) and 13+/-10% (P=0.001), respectively. These decreases were significantly greater than those observed with simvastatin alone (P=0.023 by ANOVA). Significant inverse correlations between baseline sCD40L levels and percent changes in sCD40L levels were observed (r=-0.456, P=0.001 after simvastatin alone; r=-0.476, P<0.001 after combined therapy; r=-0.451, P=0.002 after losartan alone). Losartan alone or combined therapy significantly reduced plasma sCD40L levels more than simvastatin alone in our subjects. Simvastatin, losartan and combined therapy significantly reduced sCD40L to the greatest extent in patients with high baseline sCD40L levels.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2006

Effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo.

OBJECTIVE: The use of statins has shown several anti-inflammatory actions, including modulatory effects on T cells in vitro. Since the effects on human T cells in vivo are less clarified, our aim was to investigate the effects of simvastatin on human T cells in vivo and ex vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design was applied. Eighty volunteers with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia received either simvastatin 40 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly reduced by simvastatin. The proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets expressing early (CD25) or late (HLA-DR) activation markers, as assessed by flow cytometry, were not changed by simvastatin. However, simvastatin tended to increase the density of HLA-DR and L-selectin per CD8+ T cell. The T helper(h)1/Th2 response was evaluated by stimulatory assays followed by intra-cellular staining of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4. Simvastatin treatment did not affect the Th1 response but the results indicated a potential to suppress Th2. CONCLUSION: Simvastatin treatment resulted in a few discrete changes as regards peripheral T cells. However, the findings do not provide evidence that simvastatin-induced anti-inflammatory actions are related to any significant modulatory effects on human T cells in clinically healthy men with hypercholesterolemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin compared with simvastatin in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Pitavastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used to treat hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin versus those of simvastatin in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: This was an 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase III clinical trial. Male and female Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia who were between the ages of 20 and 75 years and who had a fasting triglyceride level <600 mg/dL and a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level >130 mg/dL after a 4-week dietary lead-in period were eligible for entry. Eligible patients were randomized into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients received pitavastatin 2 mg once daily or simvastatin 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks. The medication was administered initially for 4 weeks, and an additional 4 weeks of study medication was prescribed at week 4. The final visit was conducted 8 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients randomized to treatment, 95 patients (59 women; 36 men) completed the study (49 in the pitavastatin group [mean age, 59.9 years] and 46 in the simvastatin group [mean age, 56.4 years]). No significant difference was found between groups with respect to patient age, sex, or body mass index. There was no significant difference in the percent decrease in LDL cholesterol levels (mean [SD], 38.2% [11.6%] decrease for the pitavastatin group vs 39.4% [12.9%] decrease for the simvastatin group [P = 0.648]). Also, there were no significant differences between the 2 study groups in the percent changes in total cholesterol, triglyceride, or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels from baseline to study end. No significant difference was observed for the proportion of patients who achieved the LDL cholesterol goal of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III: 93.9% (46/49) of patients in the pitavastatin group and 91.3% (42/46) of patients in the simvastatin group (P = 0.709) met the target level. At least 1 clinical adverse event and at least 1 adverse drug reaction were observed in 25.0% (13/52) and 11.5% (6/52), respectively, of patients in the pitavastatin group, and 37.3% (19/51) and 23.5% (12/51), respectively, in the simvastatin group; this difference was not statistically significant. The most common adverse event was an elevation in creatine kinase levels >2 times the upper limit of normal in 3.8% of pitavastatin-treated patients and 9.8% of simvastatin-treated patients (P = 0.269). There were no serious adverse drug reactions observed in either group. CONCLUSION: The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pitavastatin was found to be noninferior to simvastatin in terms of reducing LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, and increasing HDL cholesterol levels, in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia after 8 weeks of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Post-infarction treatment with simvastatin reduces myocardial no-reflow by opening of the KATP channel.

UNLABELLED: Simvastatin can prevent cardiac remodelling after myocardial infarction, though the exact mechanisms are uncertain. Myocardial no-reflow is associated with progressive cardiac remodelling. However, it remains unknown whether post-infarction treatment with simvastatin can also reduce myocardial no-reflow for which suppression of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channel opening is an important mechanism. METHODS: Area at risk and the area of no-reflow were determined by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and by pathology in 45 mini-swine randomised into 5 groups: 10 control, 9 simvastatin, 9 glibenclamide, 9 simvastatin plus glibenclamide and 8 sham-operated. A myocardial infarction and reperfusion model was created by 3-h occlusion of the coronary artery followed by 4 weeks of reperfusion. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, simvastatin significantly increased coronary blood volume (P<0.01) and decreased the area of no-reflow measured by MCE (78.5+/-4.5% to 43.7+/-4.3%) and pathological evaluation (82.3+/-1.9% to 45.2+/-3.8%) of area at risk (P<0.01). Simvastatin also increased the levels of K(ATP) channel proteins (SUR2 and Kir6.2) (P<0.05), but had no effect on necrosis area. The combination of simvastatin and glibenclamide had no significant effect on the above parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Post-infarction treatment with simvastatin can reduce myocardial no-reflow. This beneficial effect is due to activation of the K(ATP) channel.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Antioxidant effect of simvastatin is not enhanced by its association with alpha-tocopherol in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Among the pleiotropic effects of statins, their antioxidant action may be involved in their protective effects. Thus, we investigated the antioxidant effect of simvastatin, associated or not with alpha-tocopherol, on levels of electronegative low-density lipoprotein (LDL-), nitrotyrosine, thiols (homocysteine, glutathione, cysteine, methionine), and lipid-soluble antioxidants in blood plasma of hypercholesterolemic subjects. In this study, 25 hypercholesterolemic subjects were treated for 2 months with simvastatin (20 mg/day) and with simvastatin (20 mg/day) + alpha-tocopherol (400 IU/day). Concentrations of thiols were determined by high-performance capillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescene. Lipid-soluble antioxidants were determined by HPLC, and LDL-, and nitrotyrosine by ELISA. Simvastatin, independent of its association with alpha-tocopherol, reduced plasma concentrations of LDL-, nitrotyrosine, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and the LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio. Neither simvastatin nor simvastatin plus alpha-tocopherol altered plasma levels of the thiols analyzed. alpha-Tocopherol did not change the antioxidant effect of simvastatin on the levels of LDL- and nitrotyrosine in hypercholesterolemic subjects. The reduction of LDL- and nitrotyrosine by simvastatin seems to be related to the pleiotropic effects of this statin, and it may have an important protective effect against endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Strong suppression of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level and its mediated pro-atherosclerotic effects with simvastatin: in vivo and in vitro studies.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) significantly reflect serial changes in patients with atherosclerotic-risk factors undergoing simvastatin therapy. We further hypothesize that the site specificity of CRP on the expression of CAMs, which can be inhibited by simvastatin, is in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells (EC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Serum hs-CRP levels and vascular (V) CAM-1 were measured (on days 0, 30, 90, 180 and 270) in 59 study subjects with at least one atherosclerotic-risk factor and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >100 gm/dL. Simvastatin (40 mg/day) was given to each study subjects for 6 months. The inflammatory mediators were evaluated in 30 healthy subjects. Human umbilical vein (HUV) ECs were incubated with 1) culture medium alone, 2) added CRP for stimulation, and 3) simvastatin for 4 h before CRP was added. The hs-CRP and VCAM-1 levels were significantly higher on day 0 in study subjects than in healthy subjects (all p<0.0001). These inflammatory markers declined to a significantly lower level on day 90 (all p<0.001) and to an even lower level by day 180 (all p<0.0001). After simvastatin therapy was withdrawn, the hs-CRP level was once again significantly higher on day 270 than on day 180 (p<0.05), but VCAM-1 did not differ between day 180 and day 270. 25 micromol/L simvastatin markedly suppressed the CRP effect on VCAM-1 and intercellular CAM-1 expressions of EC. Immunocytochemical staining identified CRP in HUVEC cytoplasm. However, pretreatment with simvastatin reduced the intensity of CRP in cytoplasm. CONCLUSIONS: CRP-mediated inflammation is inhibited by simvastatin.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

The selective peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist has an additive effect on plaque regression in combination with simvastatin in experimental atherosclerosis: in vivo study by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the anti-atherogenic effects of a selective peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) agonist and simvastatin, as well as their combination, over time, in a rabbit model of experimental atherosclerosis. BACKGROUND: The PPARs are nuclear transcription factors that control a variety of cellular functions, with the potential effects required to induce plaque regression and stabilization. METHODS: Atherosclerosis was induced in rabbits (n = 37) by the combination of double-balloon injury and a nine-month high-cholesterol (HC) diet. The rabbits were randomized into a continued HC diet, a normal chow (NC) diet, NC plus simvastatin, NC plus PPAR-gamma agonist, and NC plus simvastatin plus PPAR-gamma agonist. All rabbits underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at randomization and after six months of treatment and were then sacrificed for histopathologic study. RESULTS: All groups had a similar vessel wall area by MRI (8.45 +/- 0.65 mm(2), p = NS between groups) at randomization. Significant progression was seen in the HC diet group (15 +/- 4%, p < 0.01). In the NC and NC plus PPAR-gamma agonist groups, progression was abolished (-2.5 +/- 3% and -4.5 +/- 5%, respectively; p = NS). The NC plus simvastatin and NC plus simvastatin plus PPAR-gamma agonist groups had significant plaque regression (-12 +/- 4% [p < 0.05] and -22 +/- 4% [p < 0.01], respectively). Regression was independent of plasma lipid levels. All NC groups had similar lipid profiles at the end of treatment. Histopathologic analysis of the NC groups showed a decreased macrophage content and matrix metalloproteinase activity and an increased smooth muscle cell/collagen content of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that normalization of plasma lipid levels abolishes progression of atherosclerosis. Simvastatin elicits regression of atherosclerotic lesions, and the combination simvastatin plus PPAR-gamma agonist has additive regression effects on plaque. This is paralleled by structural alterations in plaque composition, which may increase plaque stability. These observations support the beneficial effects of statins on atherosclerosis and show additional anti-atherogenic benefits of combining a PPAR-gamma agonist with simvastatin.

Animals↗