Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Response Elements”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Effect of acidosis on the properties of the glutaminase mRNA pH-response element binding protein.

The pH-responsive stabilization of the rat renal glutaminase (GA) mRNA during metabolic acidosis is mediated by a pH-response element (pH-RE). The primary pH-RE within the GA mRNA consists of a direct repeat of an 8-base adenosine and uridine-rich sequence, which binds a specific cytosolic protein, the pH-response element binding protein (REBP). The functional analysis of this system was performed in LLC-PK(1)-F(+) cells, a pH-responsive line of porcine proximal tubule-like cells. Cytosolic extracts of LLC-PK(1)-F(+) cells also contain a protein that binds with high affinity to the rat GA mRNA pH-RE. The apparent binding of this protein is increased threefold in cytosolic extracts prepared from LLC-PK(1)-F(+) cells that were grown in acidic medium (pH = 6.9, HCO(3)- = 10 mM). Extracts prepared from the renal cortex of rats that were made acutely acidotic also exhibit a similar increase in binding to the RNA probe that contains the direct repeat of the pH-RE. The temporal increase in binding correlates with the temporal increase in GA mRNA. Scatchard analysis indicates that the increased binding is due to an increase in both the affinity and the maximal binding of the pH-REBP. Thus, increased binding of the pH-REBP to the GA mRNA may initiate its stabilization and increased expression during acidosis.

Acidosis↗

Measuring specific interaction of transcription factor ZmDREB1A with its DNA responsive element at the molecular level.

Specific interactions between transcription factors and DNA responsive elements are of fundamental importance in understanding how genetic regulatory proteins control gene transcription. Here we have developed a new method of using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to quantitatively study the single molecular specific interaction between ZmDREB1A, a transcription factor from maize, and its DNA responsive element, dehydration-responsive element (DRE) with core sequence A/GCCGAC. It was found that ZmDREB1A bound to both DRE ACCGAC and GCCGAC efficiently. The single molecular interaction forces of ZmDREB1A with DRE A/GCCGAC were determined to be 101 +/- 5 and 108 +/- 3 pN, respectively. The point mutation of ZmDREB1A in its DNA-binding domain or single base substitution of the DRE core sequence greatly reduced the binding affinity, demonstrating the high sensitivity of the AFM measurements. AFM is expected to be a simple, quick, sensitive and reliable method that offers valuable information for the characterization of transcription factors and the identification of their potential DNA responsive elements in functional genomics research.

Arabidopsis Proteins↗

Cell-type-specific binding of the transcription factor CREB to the cAMP-response element.

The cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) transcription factor was initially identified as a mediator of cAMP-induced gene expression. CREB binds to a target sequence termed the cAMP-response element (CRE) found in many cellular and viral gene promoters. One of the best-characterized CREs resides in the promoter of the gene encoding the neuropeptide somatostatin, and this element has served as a model for studies of CREB function. Phosphorylation of CREB by protein kinase A allows recruitment of the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). A central tenet of the CREB-CBP model is that CREB binds constitutively to the CRE and that regulation occurs through the phosphorylation-dependent recruitment of CBP. In this report, we use chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to show that CREB does not interact in vivo with the somatostatin CRE, or similar elements in several other genes, in PC12 cells, a standard model for studies of CREB function. Rather, CREB binding in vivo is regulated in a cell-specific manner, a finding that was confirmed by using in vivo genomic footprinting assays. The CREs in other genes were also found to interact differentially with CREB in PC12 cells, hepatoma cells, and cortical neurons. We conclude that the family of CREB target genes differs from one cell type to another and that the ability of CREB to bind to a particular CRE represents an important component of gene regulation.

Animals↗

Structural basis of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements.

Steroid receptors bind as dimers to a degenerate set of response elements containing inverted repeats of a hexameric half-site separated by 3 bp of spacer (IR3). Naturally occurring selective androgen response elements have recently been identified that resemble direct repeats of the hexameric half-site (ADR3). The 3D crystal structure of the androgen receptor (AR) DNA-binding domain bound to a selective ADR3 reveals an unexpected head-to-head arrangement of the two protomers rather than the expected head-to-tail arrangement seen in nuclear receptors bound to response elements of similar geometry. Compared with the glucocorticoid receptor, the DNA-binding domain dimer interface of the AR has additional interactions that stabilize the AR dimer and increase the affinity for nonconsensus response elements. This increased interfacial stability compared with the other steroid receptors may account for the selective binding of AR to ADR3 response elements.

Androgens↗

Preferential expression of antioxidant response element mediated gene expression in astrocytes.

Transcriptional control of target genes by antioxidant/electrophile response elements has been well described in peripheral tissues. Genes that are regulated by this mechanism include the antioxidant enzymes NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, gamma-glutamyl cystine synthetase and glutathione-S-transferase. Antioxidant/electrophile response elements within a gene's promoter confer induction by low-molecular-weight electrophilic compounds such as tert-butylhydroquinone and dimethyl fumarate. We have now examined the ability of antioxidant/electrophile response elements to elicit gene expression in neurons and astrocytes in both brain slices and primary cultures using transient transfection of promoter reporter constructs. Our results using a heat-stable human placental alkaline phosphatase reporter indicate that antioxidant/electrophile response element mediated gene expression is largely restricted to astrocyte cell populations. Placental alkaline phosphatase expression was significantly elevated in astrocytes treated with the antioxidant/electrophile response element inducer dimethyl fumarate. Mutant constructs lacking a functional antioxidant/electrophile response element abolished all placental alkaline phosphatase expression in astrocytes. We suggest that astrocytic metabolic processes that normally aid and/or protect neurons may be controlled via this inducible system.

Animals↗

The interplay of half-site sequence and spacing on the activity of direct repeat thyroid hormone response elements.

Direct repeats of the hexamer AGGTCA can serve as response elements for vitamin D, thyroid hormone, or retinoic acid. The specificity of the response appears to reside in the spacing between the hexamers, with response elements for vitamin D restricted to direct repeats separated by a 3-base pair (bp) spacer, thyroid hormone a 4-bp spacer, and retinoic acid a 5-bp spacer (3-4-5 rule). Recently we have shown that the optimum thyroid hormone receptor binding site consists of an 8-bp sequence (TAAGGTCA), not a hexamer. Therefore we tested whether the 3-4-5 rule is valid for octamer sequence direct repeats. In transfection experiments octamer direct repeats with 3-, 4-, or 5-bp spacers conferred equivalently strong thyroid hormone responses, although a repeat with a 9-bp spacer was substantially weaker. For the 4- and 5-bp spacer constructs, the 5' half-site octamer had as strong an influence on thyroid hormone induction as did the 3' half-site octamer, although for the 3-bp spacer construct the 5' octamer was marginally less potent than the 3' octamer. Transfection and gel shift experiments did not suggest a simple correlation between the binding of thyroid hormone receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimers and thyroid hormone induction from these response elements. We conclude that half-site sequence can override the effect of spacing in determining the hormone responsiveness of a direct repeat response element. In addition, the thyroid hormone response may not be due simply to the binding of thyroid hormone receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimers to the DNA.

Base Sequence↗

Expression cloning of a zinc-finger cyclic AMP-response-element-binding protein.

In response to specific extracellular signals, intracellular cyclic AMP levels increase, leading to a variety of responses including the alteration of transcription of many eukaryotic genes. This transcriptional effect is frequently mediated through the cyclic AMP-response element (CRE) motif T(T/G)ACGTCA. Using an expression screening approach we have cloned a yeast gene, MSN2, that encodes a 78 kDa protein that recognizes this consensus CRE motif. Phosphorylation of the MSN2 protein by the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A stimulates DNA binding in vitro. Two putative Cys2His2-type zinc fingers present in the C-terminal 79 amino acids of the MSN2 protein are sufficient to confer CRE-binding specificity. Therefore, MSN2 represents a novel CRE-binding protein distinct from the multiple previously characterized basic region-leucine zipper repeat CRE-binding proteins.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Sequence determinants of the intrinsic bend in the cyclic AMP response element.

The cyclic AMP response element (CRE site, ATGACGTCAT) is the DNA target for transcription factors whose activities are regulated by cyclic AMP (1). Recently, we discovered that the CRE site is bent by 10-13 degrees toward the major groove (2). Little or no bend is detected in the related AP-1 site (ATGACTCAT), which differs from the CRE site by loss of a single, central, C.G base pair (2, 3). Here we describe experiments designed to identify which base pairs within the CRE site induce the bent structure in an attempt to understand the origins of the dramatically different conformations of the CRE and AP-1 sites. Our data indicate that the intrinsic CRE bend results from distortion within the TGA sequence found in each CRE half site (ATGAC). These two TGA sequences are located in phase with one another in the CRE sequence but are not (completely) in phase in the AP-1 sequence. This difference in phasing leads to the overall difference in bend as detected by gel (2) and cyclization methods (S. C. Hockings, J. D. Kahn, and D. M. Crothers, unpublished results; M. A. Fabian and A. Schepartz, unpublished results). Our results confirm earlier predictions of altered structure within TG steps, provide insight into the structural reorganizations induced in DNA by bZIP proteins, and lead to a revision of the relationship between the structures of the free and bZIP-bound forms of the CRE and AP-1 sites.

Base Composition↗

A central dinucleotide within vitamin D response elements modulates DNA binding and transactivation by the vitamin D receptor in cellular response to natural and synthetic ligands.

There is considerable divergence in the sequences of steroid receptor response elements, including the vitamin D response elements (VDREs). Two major VDRE-containing and thus 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25-(OH)(2)D(3))-regulated genes are the two non-collagenous, osteoblast-derived bone matrix proteins osteocalcin and osteopontin. We observed a stronger induction of osteopontin than osteocalcin mRNA expression by 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). Subsequently, we have shown that vitamin D receptor/retinoid X receptor alpha (VDR/RXRalpha) heterodimers bind more tightly to the osteopontin VDRE than to the osteocalcin VDRE. Studies using point mutants revealed that the internal dinucleotide at positions 3 and 4 of the proximal steroid half-element are most important for modulating the strength of receptor binding. In addition, studies with VDRE-driven luciferase reporter gene constructs revealed that the central dinucleotide influences the transactivation potential of VDR/RXRalpha with the same order of magnitude as that observed in the DNA binding studies. The synthetic vitamin D analog KH1060 is a more potent stimulator of transcription and inducer of VDRE binding of VDR/RXR in the presence of nuclear factors isolated from ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells than the natural ligand 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). Interestingly, however, KH1060 is comparable or even less potent than 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) in stimulating VDRE binding of in vitro synthesized VDR/RXRalpha. Thus, the extent of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)- and KH1060-dependent binding of VDR/RXRalpha is specified by a central dinucleotide in the VDRE, and the ligand-induced effects on DNA binding are in part controlled by the cellular context of nuclear proteins.

Animals↗

Cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate-mediated activation of a glutamine synthetase composite glucocorticoid response element.

The glutamate synthetase gene (GS) contains a composite glucocorticoid response element (cGRE) comprised of a GRE and an adjacent element with features of both a cAMP-response element (CRE) and a 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) response element (TRE). The CRE/TRE element of the cGRE contributed to two modes of transcriptional activation: 1) enhancement of the response to cortisol and 2) a synergistic response to cortisol and increased cAMP. COS-7 cells transfected with a cGRE-luciferase construct show minimal expression under basal conditions or forskolin treatment. After cortisol treatment, luciferase activity from the cGRE is enhanced 4- to 8-fold greater than the GRE portion of the cGRE or a GRE from the tyrosine aminotransferase gene. Treatment with both forskolin and cortisol produced a 2- to 4-fold synergistic response over cortisol alone. Synergy is also seen with 8-bromo-cAMP, is specific for the cGRE, and occurs in a number of established cell lines. Elimination of the GRE or CRE/TRE reduces the synergy by 70-100%. Altering the CRE/TRE to GRE spacing changed both enhancement and synergy. Moving the elements 3 bp closer or extending 15 bp reduced enhancement. Synergy was markedly reduced when elements were one half of a helical turn out of phase. Western blots verified that CREB (cAMP-responsive binding protein) and ATF-1 (activating transcription factor-1) binds to the cGRE sequence. A specific dominant negative inhibitor of the CREB family, A-CREB, reduced synergy by 50%. These results suggest that the GS cGRE can potentially integrate signaling from both the cAMP and glucocorticoid receptor transduction pathways and that CREB/ATF-1 may play an important role in this process.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗

RXR beta: a coregulator that enhances binding of retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D receptors to their cognate response elements.

The retinoic acid receptor (RAR) requires coregulators to bind effectively to response elements in target genes. A strategy of sequential screening of expression libraries with a retinoic acid response element and RAR identified a cDNA encoding a coregulator highly related to RXR alpha. This protein, termed RXR beta, forms heterodimers with RAR, preferentially increasing its DNA binding and transcriptional activity on promoters containing retinoic acid, but not thyroid hormone or vitamin D, response elements. Remarkably, RXR beta also heterodimerizes with the thyroid hormone and vitamin D receptors, increasing both DNA binding and transcriptional function on their respective response elements. RXR alpha also forms heterodimers with these receptors. These observations suggest that retinoid X receptors meet the criteria for biochemically characterized cellular coregulators and serve to selectively target the high affinity binding of retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D receptors to their cognate DNA response elements.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Full promoter sequence of human early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1): demonstration of a fifth functional serum response element.

The early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1) gene encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which is critical for cell proliferation and differentiation. The human Egr-1 promoter comprises regulatory elements including two Sp1 sites, an AP1 site, two cAMP response elements and an Egr-1 binding site. In addition to these transcription factor binding sites, the promoter harbours five serum response elements (SREs) and associated binding sites for the Ets transcription factor family, previously identified from partial sequence data (Sakamoto et al, Oncogene 6; 867-871, 1991). We now report the full sequence of the human Egr-1 promoter and confirm the presence of a fifth serum response element. This element is functionally active in a minimal promoter vector in response to the MAP kinase kinase MEK1.

Base Sequence↗

Transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1 gene is mediated by multiple cis-elements, including SP1 sites and a cAMP-responsive element in vascular endothelial cells.

In an attempt to examine the mechanisms by which transcriptional activity of the cyclin D1 promoter is regulated in vascular endothelial cells (EC), we examined the cis-elements in the human cyclin D1 promoter, which are required for transcriptional activation of the gene. The results of luciferase assays showed that transcriptional activity of the cyclin D1 promoter was largely mediated by SP1 sites and a cAMP-responsive element (CRE). DNA binding activity at the SP1 sites, which was analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays, was significantly increased in the early to mid G(1) phase, whereas DNA binding activity at CRE did not change significantly. Furthermore, Induction of the cyclin D1 promoter activity in the early to mid G(1) phase depended largely on the promoter fragment containing the SP1 sites, whereas the proximal fragment containing CRE but not the SP1 sites was constitutively active. Finally, the increase in DNA binding and promoter activities via the SP1 sites was mediated by the Ras-dependent pathway. The results suggested that the activation of the cyclin D1 gene in vascular ECs was regulated by a dual system; one was inducible in the G(1) phase, and the other was constitutively active.

Activating Transcription Factor 1↗

Transcriptional synergism on the pS2 gene promoter between a p160 coactivator and estrogen receptor-alpha depends on the coactivator subtype, the type of estrogen response element, and the promoter context.

The pS2 gene is estrogen responsive in hepatocarcinoma cells (HepG2) in the presence of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha). The estrogenic activity is mediated through an estrogen response element (ERE) in the 5'-flanking region of the pS2 gene; however, an activator protein 1 (AP1) response element located close to the ERE in the pS2 promoter has also proven essential for a maximum response to estrogen. In the present study, we show estrogen-induced synergistic activity by the p160 coactivator steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), mediated via the ERE and the AP1 response element in the pS2 promoter. In addition, we present data that support an interaction between the ERE and the AP1 motif via SRC-1. The related but distinct p160 coactivator, transcriptional intermediary factor-2, was a more potent activator of pS2 gene expression. In addition, transcriptional intermediary factor-2 was less dependent on an intact AP1 response element in the pS2 promoter than SRC-1. Furthermore, the type of ERE in the pS2 promoter influenced the potentiation by SRC-1, supported by less dependence on the AP1 motif when the natural ERE was substituted for by a consensus ERE. These results highlight several mechanisms whereby fine-tuning of estrogen responsiveness of an individual gene may be achieved.

Base Sequence↗

Transcriptional regulation of the human CYP1B1 gene. Evidence for involvement of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor response element in constitutive expression.

The cytochrome P450 1B1 gene (CYP1B1) is expressed constitutively and is inducible by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 but not in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. Genomic DNA isolated from both cell lines was digested with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme isoschizomers MspI and HpaII, and subjected to Southern analysis with a probe for the CYP1B1 promoter/enhancer region. Although differences were observed in methylation patterns for the CYP1B1 gene from MCF-7 and HepG2 cells, treatment with the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine (10 microM for 6 days) did not activate CYP1B1 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells. Furthermore, treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (100 nM for 24 h) did not activate CYP1B1 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells. Comparative analysis of the constitutive expression of luciferase/1B1 reporter constructs containing a series of deletions in the 5' enhancer region indicated that in MCF-7 cells the region from -987 to -732 (relative to the transcription start site) was necessary for maximal levels of activity. Mutation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor response elements (dioxin response elements) in this region showed that the dioxin response elements located at -833 is essential for constitutive gene expression in MCF-7 cells. In HepG2 cells, reporter gene activity was at least equal or greater than the activity observed in MCF-7 cells, which is in marked contrast to the expression of the native CYP1B1 gene. Taken together these findings indicate that the observed cell-specific differences in CYP1B1 constitutive expression are not mediated by DNA promoter/enhancer methylation, but are likely due to either 1) inaccessibility of the 5'-enhancer region in HepG2 cells to transcriptional activators due to a higher order chromatin structure that does not involve histone acetylation, or 2) the action of a repressor protein at cis-elements located outside of the -2296 to +25 region examined with the CYP1B1 reporter constructs. Furthermore, at least one of the dioxin response elements in the enhancer region is required for constitutive expression of CYP1B1.

Acetylation↗

IFN-stimulated gene 15 is synergistically activated through interactions between the myelocyte/lymphocyte-specific transcription factors, PU.1, IFN regulatory factor-8/IFN consensus sequence binding protein, and IFN regulatory factor-4: characterization of a new subtype of IFN-stimulated response element.

Type I IFNs cause the induction of a subset of genes termed IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), which harbor a specific DNA element, IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE). This ISRE confers the responsiveness to the IFN signal through the binding of a family of transcription factors designated IFN regulatory factors (IRFs). Some IRFs can bind to the DNA alone, such as IRF-1, which elicits transcriptional activation, or IRF-2, which leads to transcriptional repression. In addition, these factors associate with IRF-8/IFN consensus sequence binding protein (ICSBP), an immune cell-restricted IRF, and the assembled heterocomplexes lead to synergistic repression of ISRE elements. ISG15 is a prototype ISG that contains a well-characterized ISRE. Here we show that PU.1, an ETS member essential for myeloid/lymphoid cell differentiation, forms heterocomplexes with the immune-restricted IRFs, IRF-8\/ICSBP and IRF-4, which lead to transcriptional activation of ISG15. These data allowed the characterization of a subset of ISREs designated ETS/IRF response element (EIRE), which are differentially regulated in immune cells. EIREs are unique in their ability to recruit different factors to an assembled enhanceosomes. In nonimmune cells the factors will mainly include IRF members, while cell type-restricted factors, such as PU.1, IRF-8\/ICSBP, and IRF-4, will be recruited in immune cells. IRF heterocomplex formation leads to transcriptional repression, and conversely, PU.1/IRFs heterocomplex formation leads to transcriptional activation. The fact that IRF-8\/ICSBP is an IFN-gamma-induced factor explains why some of the EIREs are also induced by type II IFN. Our results lay the molecular basis for the unique regulation of ISGs, harboring EIRE, in immune cells.

3T3 Cells↗

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor stimulates AP-1 and cyclic AMP-responsive element dependent transcriptional activity in central nervous system neurons.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the neurotrophin family, regulates survival and apoptosis of several neuronal populations. These effects are initiated by high-affinity membrane receptors displaying tyrosine kinase activity (trk). However, the intracellular pathways and genetic mechanisms associated with these receptors are largely unknown. Here we show that BDNF stimulates AP1 binding activity in primary cerebellar neurons. This binding corresponds to a functional complex as it is associated with the induction of AP1-dependent transactivation. Application of AP1 partner mRNAs shows an increase in levels of c-fos and c-jun mRNAs after BDNF treatment, resulting from an induction of their promoters. The cis-acting elements by which BDNF stimulates c-fos transcription were further studied. We show that BDNF impinges on multiple regulatory elements, including the serum-responsive element, Fos AP1-like element, and cyclic AMP (cAMP)-responsive element (CRE) sequences. The latter was stimulated without any detectable increase in cAMP or Ca2+ levels. To confirm that BDNF induces c-fos transcription independently of the protein kinase A/cAMP pathway, we transfected a dominant inhibitory mutant of the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A. The overexpression of this mutant does not affect the c-fos promoter transactivation by BDNF. In summary, we show that BDNF stimulates AP1- and CRE-dependent transcription through a mechanism that is distinct from the cAMP- and Ca(2+)-dependent pathways in CNS neurons.

Animals↗