Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RHINITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Development of turbinate lesions and nasal colonization by Bordetella bronchiseptica and Pasteurella multocida during long-term exposure of healthy pigs to pigs affected by atrophic rhinitis.

Natural transmission of atrophic rhinitis from pigs from a herd with an endemic atrophic rhinitis problem to pigs from a herd free of atrophic rhinitis was demonstrated. Six replicates each with five pigs from the endemic atrophic rhinitis herd (Group A) and five pigs from the atrophic rhinitis-free herd (Group B) were housed together from 5 wk of age, with each replicate kept in isolation rooms maintained at optimal and controlled environmental conditions. Three replicates each with six pigs/room from the atrophic rhinitis-free herd (Group C), served as nonexposed controls. Group C pigs remained healthy and had no turbinate atrophy at either 10 or 17 wk of study (atrophic rhinitis score = 0 on a 0 to 3 scale). Group A pigs had a mean atrophic rhinitis score of 1.85 +/- 0.84, and group B pigs developed atrophic rhinitis to a mean score of 1.57 +/- 0.70. The isolation rate and quantity of Pasteurella multocida found on nasal swabs was directly related to lesions while those for Bordetella bronchiseptica were inversely related to turbinate atrophy. Of the various types of P. multocida evaluated, nontoxigenic type A and toxigenic type D were both directly related to atrophic rhinitis while nontoxigenic type D strains were not. No toxigenic type A P. multocida strains were isolated.

Animals↗

Clinical advantages of dual activity in allergic rhinitis.

Symptoms of allergic rhinitis include sneezing; itching of the eyes, nose, and throat; nasal obstruction; and rhinorrhoea; they may be seasonal or perennial, depending on the causative allergen. The major symptom of perennial allergic rhinitis is nasal obstruction. Sneezing and rhinorrhoea are often present, but are less troublesome than in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Symptom relief is a priority in allergic rhinitis because patients have a severely impaired quality of life. The nasal vascular system is complex. Histamine acts on postcapillary venules during both the immediate and late phase of reactivity and causes plasma extravasation. Other inflammatory mediators can also induce this reaction. Thus, histamine antagonists that also have some additional antiallergic properties have advantages in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Mizolastine is a second-generation antihistamine that has been shown, in experimental studies, to possess 5-lipoxygenase inhibitory properties in addition to its H1-receptor antagonistic activity. In the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, mizolastine 10 mg/day has been shown to be effective in reducing nasal and ocular symptoms. It has been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo with a greater percentage of responders. Another study has shown that symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in mizolastine-treated patients were reduced more significantly than in cetirizine-treated patients on the second and third days of treatment. In perennial allergic rhinitis, mizolastine significantly improved symptoms of nasal obstruction compared with placebo and also significantly reduced nasal membrane colour, nasal secretions, and mucosal swelling as shown by rhinoscopy. These effects were maintained over a 5-month treatment period. Mizolastine has also been shown to be at least as effective as loratadine, and in one trial even superior in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

Anti-Allergic Agents↗

[Nasal polyposis and allergic rhinitis--our experience].

Nasal polyposis is a multifactor disease characterised by chronic eosinophilic inflammation of the nasal and sinal mucosae. Its aetiology is unknown, but it's often associated with other diseases: allergic rhinitis, asthma, and aspirin sensitivity in adult patients. In children, mucoviscidosis is possible. The aim of this paper is to determine the relationship between nasal polyposis and allergic rhinitis, and their link with idiopathic rhinitis. The study involved 100 patients of both sexes. Patients were divided into three groups: group I--with allergic rhinitis (65 patients), group II--with idiopathic rhinitis (25 patients), and group III--without any diseases of the upper airways (10 patients). All patients underwent ENT examinations, blood laboratory and microbiology tests, RTG tests, as well as skin prick tests on inhalant allergens. In the group with allergic rhinitis, 21 patients had nasal polyposis. In the group with idiopathic rhinitis, 7 patients had nasal polyposis. In the control group, all the patients exhibited normal endonasal findings. Statistically significant difference was present only between the group of patients with allergic rhinitis and the control group (p=0.034). Nasal polyposis is related to allergic rhinitis, although the reason why polyposis develops in some patients and not in others remains unknown.

Adolescent↗

Different prevalence and degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity between seasonal and perennial rhinitis.

From the patients observed at our respiratory allergology service, we selected patients with rhinitis only, without any past or present respiratory symptoms, for our study. All these patients had normal pulmonary function, were administered carbachol or methacholine bronchial challenges, and had one or more skin reactions to perennial or seasonal allergens. Patients were allocated to three groups: group A, patients with seasonal rhinitis who were administered nonspecific challenges out of season; group B, patients with seasonal rhinitis tested during the season; and group C, patients with perennial rhinitis. The three groups were divided into subgroups according to the duration in years of rhinitis and to the degree of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness. The distribution into four groups of reactivity, arbitrarily defined as normal and mildly, moderately, and severely increased reactivity, was as follows: group A, 124, 21, 30, 22; group B, 75, 15, 7, and 21: and group C, 69, 17, 39, and 72, respectively. The patients of group C (perennial rhinitis) demonstrated a distribution significantly (p less than 0.001) different from subjects with seasonal rhinitis, both group A and group B. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that perennial rhinitis is much more important than seasonal rhinitis as a risk factor for developing nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Age Factors↗

Allergic rhinitis and asthma: how important is the link?

Dysfunction of the upper and lower airways frequently coexist, and they appear to share key elements of pathogenesis. Data from epidemiologic studies indicate that nasal symptoms are experienced by as many as 78% of patients with asthma and that asthma is experienced by as many as 38% of patients with allergic rhinitis. Studies also have identified a temporal relation between the onset of rhinitis and asthma, with rhinitis frequently preceding the development of asthma. Patients with allergic rhinitis and no clinical evidence of asthma commonly exhibit nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The observation that management of allergic rhinitis also relieves symptoms of asthma has heightened interest in the link between these diseases. Intranasal corticosteroids can prevent increases in nonspecific bronchial reactivity and asthma symptoms associated with seasonal pollen exposure. Similarly, among patients with perennial rhinitis, daily asthma symptoms, exercise-induced bronchospasm, and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine are reduced after administration of intranasal corticosteroids. Antihistamines, with or without decongestants, reduce seasonal rhinitis symptoms, asthma symptoms, and objective measurements of pulmonary function among patients with rhinitis and asthma. The mechanisms that connect upper and lower airway dysfunction are under investigation. They include a nasal-bronchial reflex, mouth breathing caused by nasal obstruction, and pulmonary aspiration of nasal contents. Nasal allergen challenge results in increases in lower airway reactivity within 30 minutes, suggesting a neural reflex. Improvements in asthma associated with increased nasal breathing may be the result of superior humidification, warming of inspired air, and decreased inhalation of airborne allergens. Postnasal drainage of inflammatory cells during sleep also may affect lower airway responsiveness. A link between allergic rhinitis and asthma is evident from epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and clinical studies. Future research, however, is needed to determine whether nasal therapy can alter the natural history of asthma.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Physician-diagnosed asthma and allergic rhinitis in Manitoba: 1985-1998.

BACKGROUND: A worldwide increase has been noted in the prevalence of asthma, but the data for other allergic disorders are less consistent. OBJECTIVE: To study 14-year trends in utilization of physician resources for asthma and compare them to trends for allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We studied visits to physicians by Manitoba residents for asthma (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 493) and allergic rhinitis (ICD-9 code 477) between 1985 and 1998. Prevalence and incidence of physician resources utilization were calculated annually for the total population and by age groups. Aggregate statistics and frequency of physician resources utilization were also analyzed. RESULTS: The prevalence and incidence of physician resources utilization for asthma increased more than for allergic rhinitis; differences were most striking in the youngest age groups. In adults, the differences were smaller and changed little with time. Most of the increase in asthma care occurred in children and in people without allergic rhinitis. Overall, 17% of Manitobans were diagnosed as having asthma, and the average asthmatic patient made 6 visits. Approximately 14% had an allergic rhinitis diagnosis, each person being seen twice on average. Coexistence of asthma and allergic rhinitis led to increased physician resources utilization for each of the conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in utilization of physician resources for allergic rhinitis differed strikingly from trends for asthma, particularly in the youngest age group. Asthma and allergic rhinitis affected comparable proportions of the population, but a diagnosis of asthma resulted in much higher utilization of physician resources. The relationship of physician-diagnosed asthma and atopy, as indicated by the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, appears to have weakened with time in children but not in adults.

Adolescent↗

Peak flow variability and sputum eosinophilia in allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Although some non-asthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis exhibit airway hyperresponsiveness and increased diurnal peak expiratory flow (PEF) variation, little is known about the critical features that determine these physiologic alterations. OBJECTIVE: In subjects with allergic rhinitis and methacholine hyperresponsiveness but no asthma symptoms, we examined whether there were features of asthmatic airway inflammation. METHODS: Forty non-asthmatic adults (11 with allergic rhinitis and methacholine hyperresponsiveness, 20 with allergic rhinitis and normal methacholine responsiveness, and 9 healthy control subjects) were studied. Sputum was induced with inhaled hypertonic saline for 5-minute periods for up to 20 minutes. Plugs from the lower respiratory tract were selected for differential counting in cytocentrifuged preparations. For the next 14 days, subjects measured their PEF two times daily. Peak expiratory flow variation was expressed as amplitude % mean. RESULTS: Peak expiratory flow variation was significantly higher in subjects with allergic rhinitis and methacholine hyperresponsiveness than in allergic rhinitis patients with normal methacholine responsiveness and healthy controls. Eosinophil counts in the induced sputum were significantly higher in the subjects with allergic rhinitis and methacholine hyperresponsiveness [median (interquartile range), 7.3 (9.0)%] compared with allergic rhinitis patients with normal methacholine responsiveness [2.5 (3.8)%, P = .03] and healthy controls [1.0 (1.0)%, P = .02]. CONCLUSION: We conclude that eosinophilic inflammation may be present in subjects with allergic rhinitis and airway hyperresponsiveness even when there are no symptoms of asthma. This could indicate that bronchial eosinophilia is insufficient to cause asthmatic symptoms.

Adult↗

Autoanti-IgE antibodies in patients with allergic and idiopathic rhinitis.

The pathophysiology of idiopathic rhinitis is unknown although evidence is accumulating to suggest that, in a proportion of patients, it may be a more localized form of allergic rhinitis in the absence of other atopic symptoms and markers. Anti-IgE is thought to be a systemic marker of atopy. This study compared serum IgG autoanti-IgE levels in patients with idiopathic rhinitis, perennial allergic rhinitis and normal controls. Serum samples were obtained from 19 patients with idiopathic rhinitis, 17 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and 10 normal non-rhinitic controls. The presence or absence of IgG1 and IgG4 anti-IgE antibodies was detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Eighty-eight percent of the patients with perennial allergic rhinitis had raised levels of autoanti-IgE antibodies in their serum. None of the controls or patients with idiopathic rhinitis showed raised levels (P < 0.001). Although patients with idiopathic rhinitis may exhibit clinical and pathological features of allergy, they do not show raised levels of anti-IgE in their serum.

Autoantibodies↗

Systemic immunologic and inflammatory aspects of allergic rhinitis.

Allergic rhinitis is a common chronic condition that is characterized by inflammation of the nasal mucosa. Although allergic rhinitis is a condition with upper respiratory symptoms, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that allergic rhinitis may be linked to the development of systemic allergic manifestations that include allergic asthma. The evidence reveals that individuals with allergic rhinitis are sensitized to the eliciting allergens and exhibit cutaneous and respiratory hypersensitivity responses on exposure to the allergen. On exposure to a nasal allergen, circulating immunoglobulin E levels increased and remained elevated 2 weeks after the initial provocation. Patients with allergic rhinitis exhibit peripheral eosinophilia and basophilia, the magnitude of which correlates with the severity of symptoms. Additionally, there are several links between allergic rhinitis and asthma. First, 85% to 95% of patients with allergic asthma report rhinitis symptoms, and the severity of the 2 conditions increases in parallel on exposure to an allergen. Second, nasal administration of allergens can provoke impaired lower airway airflow in 25% to 30% of individuals and cause airway eosinophilia, as evidenced by increased numbers of eosinophils in sputum and mucosal biopsy specimens. Third, the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with both systemic (eg, antihistamines) and local agents (eg, glucocorticosteroid analogues) can alleviate the symptoms of asthma. In summary, evidence that associates allergic rhinitis with systemic immunologic and inflammatory processes is growing, thereby warranting further in-depth investigation.

Humans↗

Treating allergic rhinitis in patients with comorbid asthma: the risk of asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits.

BACKGROUND: Although asthma and allergic rhinitis commonly occur together, the nature of the association has yet to be determined. Treatments for one condition could potentially alleviate the coexisting condition. OBJECTIVE: Patients with both allergic rhinitis and asthma were studied to test the hypothesis that treating allergic rhinitis reduces health care utilization for co-morbid asthma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out with 1994-1995 MarketScan claims data. The cohort was limited to patients with both allergic rhinitis and asthma, aged 12 to 60 years, who were continuously enrolled and had no evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Allergic rhinitis treatment and asthma-related events (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) were identified. An incidence density ratio (IDR) associated with exposure to allergic rhinitis treatment was calculated. A multivariate Poisson regression was estimated, and the parameter estimates were transformed into IDRs for each explanatory variable. An allergic rhinitis treatment indicator was included in all regressions. RESULTS: The study sample population consisted of 4944 patients with allergic asthma, approximately 73% of whom were treated for their allergic rhinitis. Asthma-related events occurred more often for the untreated group compared with the treated group, 6.6% compared with 1.3%. An IDR of 0.49 for the treatment group (P =.001) indicates that the risk of an asthma-related event for the treated group was about half that for the untreated group. CONCLUSION: In summary, those who were treated for allergic rhinitis have a significantly lower risk of subsequent asthma-related events (emergency department visits or hospitalizations) than those who were not treated.

Adolescent↗

Environmental risk factors of rhinitis in early infancy.

Previous studies of allergic rhinitis in children have not documented the environmental risk factors for infants at age one. We examined the relationship of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and visible mold exposures on the development of allergic rhinitis, rhinitis and upper respiratory infection (URI) in a birth cohort where at least one parent was skin prick test (SPT) positive. ETS exposure and upper respiratory symptoms were obtained by questionnaires. Visible mold was classified as none, low or high during home visit. Infants had a SPT at age one. After adjustment for potential confounders, exposure to >20 cigarettes per day was associated with an increased risk of developing allergic rhinitis at age one [odds ratio (OR)=2.7; 95% CI 1.04-6.8] and rhinitis symptoms during the first year (OR=1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Infants with low (OR=1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.3) or high (OR=5.1; 95% CI 2.2-12.1) levels of visible mold in their homes were more likely to have more frequent URI during the first year. Older siblings were protective for development of both rhinitis symptoms and allergic rhinitis. This study suggests that ETS exposure, rather than visible mold, is associated with rhinitis and allergic rhinitis in infants. The analysis also suggests that mold may be a stronger risk factor for URI that ETS.

Causality↗

Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe.

To measure the prevalence of allergic rhinitis among European adults and the proportion of undiagnosed subjects, a two-step, cross-sectional, population-based survey in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK was undertaken. Step one of the study involved screening for allergic rhinitis by telephone interview, based on history of symptoms and/or self-awareness of the condition. Step two undertook confirmation of allergic rhinitis in a subset of the subjects screened positive; this was performed by a clinical diagnosis conducted in three to five clinical centres per country, including specific immunoglobulin E tests and a disease-specific questionnaire. A total of 9,646 telephone interviews were conducted between February and April 2001. Self-awareness of allergic rhinitis was reported by 19% of the subjects. Physician-based diagnosis of allergic rhinitis was reported by 13% of the subjects. In step two, 725 clinical assessments were conducted between May and August 2001. A total of 411 of patients, who underwent step two, had investigator-confirmed allergic rhinitis. Among patients with investigator-confirmed allergic rhinitis, 45% had not reported a previous diagnosis by a physician. Prevalence of subjects with clinically confirmable allergic rhinitis estimated by combining step one and step two data ranged from 17% in Italy to 29% in Belgium with an overall value of 23%. This large-scale study confirms that allergic rhinitis has a high prevalence in western Europe and is frequently undiagnosed.

Adult↗

[Health-related quality of life assessment in patients with allergic rhinitis].

Allergic rhinitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, which can interfere with many aspects of an individual's life and severely diminish the quality of life of the person affected. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of life of patients suffering from allergic rhinitis during and out of pollen season. The study involved 100 patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, 48 of who had seasonal, 25 perennial, and 27 who manifested both forms of allergic rhinitis. All study participants were treated at the Institute of Allergology and Immunology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, in the period March-November 2002. A specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with rhinoconjunctivitis was used in the study. During pollen season, itchy eyes (chi2 = 6.34; p = 0.042), red eyes (chi2 = 7.44; p = 0.024), and swollen eyes (chi2 = 6.65; p = 0.036) caused significantly more difficulties for subjects with seasonal and those with both seasonal and perennial rhinitis than for subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis. A highly significant difference in the mean scores of the indoors activity variable during and out of pollen season (F = 347.28; p = 0.000) was noted, that is to say, significant irritation was noted during pollen season among subjects with seasonal and those with both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, however the dynamics of irritation remained the same in both study groups (F = 0.145; p = 0.704). The patients with seasonal and those with both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis experienced a significantly poorer quality of life during pollen season than out of it, as well as an inferior quality of life in comparison to patients with perennial allergic rhinitis during pollen season.

Adult↗

Psychological status of patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis.

There has been a tendency among some clinicians to underestimate the psychological problems of patients with rhinitis. This study assesses the psychological status of allergic rhinitis patients and the influence of type, duration, and severity of rhinitis on the psychiatric evaluation. Forty-one patients with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and 36 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. All patients and control subjects were studied through psychological interviews and several psychological tests such as Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Courtauld Emotional Control Scale, the McMaster Family Assessment Device, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Statistically significant differences between patients and controls were observed in all subscales of the SCL-90, particularly in somatization, depression, and general symptom index subscales. Differences between groups were not significant for the other psychological tests. Additionally, differences between seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis patients were not significant in all questionnaires. Total symptom scores of rhinitis were positively correlated with general symptom index, somatization, interpersonal relationship difficulties subgroups of the SCL-90, whereas negatively correlated with the scores of satisfaction with the life scale. Patients with allergic rhinitis--regardless of type of rhinitis--may develop a group of psychological complaints related to symptom severity. Since the recognition of specific psychiatric disorders can have therapeutic importance, further studies focusing on the associations of these disorders and allergic rhinitis should be conducted.

Adolescent↗

[Assessment of the hearing organ in the patients with allergic perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis].

We studied 60 patients with allergic rhinitis (30 with seasonal and 30 with perennial rhinitis). Assessment of atopic status was based on medical history, physical examination, skin-prick testing, total IgE levels and nasal smears. Audiometry and tympanometry have been performed. Audiometric conductive hearing loss was found in 26.7% patients with perennial rhinitis and in 10% patients with seasonal rhinitis. Type B tympanogram were found in 20% of the patients with perennial rhinitis and in 3.33% of the patients with seasonal rhinitis. Type C tympanogram were found in 20% of the patients with perennial and in 6.67% with seasonal rhinitis. Secretory otitis media and retraction pockets were more common in patients with perennial rhinitis allergy. Local allergic reaction in the middle ear and dysfunction of the Eustachian tube can be the most responsible for these disorders. Tympanostomy and ventilation tubes were needed in secretory otitis and myringoplasty in the cases of the retraction pockets. Appropriate treatment of allergic rhinitis may decrease the need and frequency of surgical procedures and may reduce costs associated with hospitalization.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis in children.

Eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis is a newly described symptom complex reported to occur in a significant percentage of adult patients who have symptoms of perennial rhinitis. They are characterized by nasal eosinophilia, negative allergy skin tests, and a normal serum immunoglobulin E concentration. Twelve children, aged 6 to 17 years, who represent the syndrome of eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis, have been identified. All have severe perennial rhinitis and nasal eosinophilia. Physical examination revealed pale, boggy membranes with a clear nasal discharge in ten of 12 patients. All 12 patients had a normal serum IgE concentration. All patients initially received an antihistamine-decongestant preparation with subjective improvement in seven of 12 patients. The remaining five patients were placed on a regimen of either topical or systemic steroids and all five had dramatic responses with marked improvement of symptoms. The negative skin tests and normal serum IgE help distinguish this entity from allergic rhinitis, whereas the positive nasal eosinophilia and response to steroids will differentiate eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis from vasomotor rhinitis. Eosinophilic nonallergic rhinitis is an important cause of perennial rhinitis in children and better knowledge of this entity should lead to more aggressive and efficacious therapy.

Adolescent↗

Poor sleep and daytime somnolence in allergic rhinitis: significance of nasal congestion.

Patients with allergic rhinitis frequently present with symptoms of nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, daytime somnolence and fatigue associated with decreased cognitive performance and impaired quality of life. Recent research has suggested that daytime somnolence in allergic rhinitis can be attributed to chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa leading to nasal congestion and obstructed nasal passageways resulting in disturbed sleep. Treating daytime somnolence due to allergic rhinitis requires a reduction in obstruction caused by nasal congestion. Currently available therapy for allergic rhinitis includes topical corticosteroids, sedating and nonsedating antihistamines, topical cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglycate), decongestants, immunotherapy and topical ipratropium bromide. The effectiveness of antihistamines in patients with allergic rhinitis has long been established. However, results of placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of azelastine on sleep and daytime somnolence have produced conflicting results. Sleep improved with azelastine therapy, but there was a lack of evidence that azelastine significantly affected daytime sleepiness, sleep severity and nasal congestion. Sedating antihistamines exacerbate daytime somnolence and should be avoided in patients with allergic rhinitis. In a separate study, desloratadine failed to benefit sleep, but did not worsen daytime somnolence. Topical nasal cromolyn sodium is inconvenient to use and is unlikely to have a major effect on nasal congestion. Decongestants do decrease nasal congestion but the effect this has on sleep has not been adequately studied. Recent research has shown that topical corticosteroids are an effective treatment for alleviating nasal congestion secondary to allergic rhinitis. However, few studies have assessed the effect of topical corticosteroids on daytime fatigue and sleep. In 20 patients with allergic rhinitis and symptoms of daytime sleepiness, flunisolide significantly improved sleep quality and congestion but daytime sleepiness was not significantly improved. A similar study with fluticasone propionate showed improvement in nasal congestion and sleep but there was no significant change in objective sleep measurements recorded on polysomnography. Further research involving objective measures of sleep quality is necessary to determine the efficacy of medications in the treatment of allergic rhinitis associated with fatigue and daytime somnolence.

Administration, Intranasal↗

Thoughts on the pathophysiology of nonallergic rhinitis.

Nonallergic noninfectious rhinitis is a diagnosis by exclusion, meaning that a number of poorly defined nasal conditions that have in common allergy and infection as a cause of the rhinitis have been excluded. The etiology of some subgroups of nonallergic noninfectious rhinitis, like nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES) and drug-induced rhinitis, are quite well defined, but in the majority of the patients, the etiology and pathophysiology are unknown. These patients are classified as idiopathic rhinitis patients. A careful determination of the intensity of the symptoms combined with modern diagnostic tools enables us to discriminate idiopathic rhinitis patients from normal controls. This review discusses the possible pathophysicologic mechanisms of nonallergic noninfectious rhinitis, with emphasis on idiopathic rhinitis.

Diagnosis, Differential↗