Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RESINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Mathematical model and dimensional analysis of glycocholate binding to cholestyramine resin: implications for in vivo resin performance.

In large doses, cholestyramine resin lowers blood serum cholesterol by binding bile salts in the intestinal lumen and thus increases the fecal excretion of bile salts. In order to gain a better understanding of the low in vivo potency of cholestyramine, mathematical models estimating the amount of glycocholate bound per gram of cholestyramine and the free glycocholate concentration were derived and employ the capacity-corrected molar selectivity coefficient. Predictions of the quantity of glycocholate bound per gram of cholestyramine and of the free glycocholate concentration matched observed values (r2 = 0.993 and r2 = 0.998, respectively) over a wide range of conditions. Simulated binding studies indicated the relative importance of several biopharmaceutical parameters for improved resin in vivo performance. Increasing resin selectivity of glycocholate over chloride has greatest therapeutic impact if bile salt sequestering is most important in the upper portion of the intestines. Furthermore, ion exchange phenomena was subjected to dimensional analysis and revealed the controlling factors as components of two dimensionless numbers, GC* and Cl*. Placing physiologic limits on values of GC* and Cl* suggests requisite selectivity properties of more potent bile acid sequestrants and dosing strategies to optimize current resin therapy.

Binding Sites↗

Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the microtensile bond strength to ground enamel of different types of materials used as pit and fissure sealants in combination with different substrate conditioners. METHODS: From 40 sound extracted molars, eight groups of five teeth were randomly formed. The experimental groups were: (1) (C) 37% phosphoric acid/ClinPro Sealant (3M ESPE); (2) (G) 37% phosphoric acid/Guardian Seal (Kerr); (3) (E/TF) 37% phosphoric acid/Excite/Tetric Flow (Ivoclar-Vivadent) (4) (OS/UF) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step (Bisco)/UniFil Flow (GC); (5) (OS/AE) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step/AEliteflo (Bisco); (6) (UB/UF) UniFil Bond/UniFil Flow (GC); (7) (CC/FVII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji VII (GC); (8) (CC/FII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji II LC Improved (GC). On the buccal of each tooth, a 5mm high build-up was created by incrementally adding layers of the sealing material on the conditioned enamel. By serially cutting the built-up tooth, multiple beam-shaped specimens about 1mm x 1mm in cross section were obtained, and loaded in tensile (0.5 mm/min) until failure occurred. RESULTS: The bond strengths measured in MPa were: (C) 20.41+/-11.79; (G) 16.02+/-7.99; (E/TF) 24.06+/-9.67; OS/UF 15.63+/-9.00; (OS/AE) 9.31+/-6.05; (UB/UF) 4.96+/-3.46; (CC/FVII) 1.70+/-2.19; (CC/FII) 2.19+/-1.44. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional and the resin-modified glass ionomers measured bond strengths significantly lower than those of any resin-based materials. Failure frequently occurred cohesively within the cement. Flowable composites in combination with phosphoric acid and a total-etch adhesive performed similarly to resin-based materials specifically conceived for sealings, such as ClinPro Sealant and Guardian Seal. The bond achieved by resin composite when treating enamel with the self-etching primer used in this study (UniFil Bond) was significantly lower than that developed when the substrate was etched with 37% phosphoric acid.

Acrylic Resins↗

The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin.

OBJECTIVE: To test the elastic wall concept utilizing adhesive resins of varying stiffness in a low- and high-C-factor cavity design after short- and long-term water storage. METHODS: A flat and box-shaped cavity was restored on occlusal dentin with a resin composite using a filled and unfilled adhesive resin from which microtensile specimens with a 0.5mm(2) cross-sectional area were formed. After storage for 30- and 150-days the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) was determined in a Zwick materials testing machine and the subsequent debond pathway was examined under scanning electron microscopy. Fisher's exact test was used to determine differences in joint and substrate failure modes and a Weibull regression model with gamma frailties was used to test for differences between failure distributions. Tests for three-way and two-way interactions were also completed for storage time, C-factor and adhesive. All tests were at 95% confidence levels. RESULTS: The characteristic strength (TBS degrees ) for the Optibond FL adhesive applied on a flat cavity was 47.57 and 20.90MPa and a box-shaped cavity was 49.26 and 17.49MPa for short- and long-term storage, respectively, while the corresponding TBS degrees for the unfilled Optibond adhesive on the flat cavity design was 36.93 and 32.68MPa and in a box-shaped cavity was 32.84 and 15.46MPa. Combining all groups according to storage time revealed a three-fold increase in the debond pathway including the bottom of the hybrid layer. SIGNIFICANCE: Evidence suggests that the durability of the bonded joint is threatened by hydrolysis and the most susceptible region is the bottom half of the hybrid layer and in low C-factor cavity designs a more flexible adhesive resin liner was more durable.

Adhesiveness↗

A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems.

The object of this study was to compare the shear bond strength and the quantity of adhesive remaining on the tooth after the debonding of brackets bonded with two light-cured orthodontic resin adhesive systems (Transbond XT and Light-Bond) and a dual-cured resin cement (RelyX Unicem). Seventy-five premolars were divided into three groups. In each group, brackets were bonded with one of the adhesives according to the manufacturer's instructions. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of one mm/min, and adhesive remnant was quantified using image analysis equipment. Our results showed that the resin cement produced significantly lower bond strength than the two orthodontic resin adhesive systems. It was also observed that the bond strength produced by Light-Bond was significantly greater than that of Transbond XT. RelyX left significantly less remnant adhesive than Transbond XT and Light-Bond. Between the two orthodontic systems, Light-Bond left significantly less adhesive on the tooth than Transbond XT.

Bicuspid↗

Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions.

The purpose of this study was a 3-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer and a composite resin restorative material in non-carious class V lesions. In 24 patients 98 non-carious class V lesions were restored with either a resin modified glass-ionomer (Vitremer), or a composite resin restoration (Z100). The restorations were clinically evaluated after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months with the US Public Health Service criteria. At 3 years, 88 teeth of 21 patients were evaluated. All restorations were rated clinically acceptable for colour match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation and anatomical form. Restoration retention of both groups was high without any statistically significant difference. However, Vitremer restorations showed a lower incidence of Alfa scores for colour match and marginal discoloration than Z100 restorations (P < 0.05).

Adult↗

Comparison of the apical seal obtained by a dual-cure resin based cement or an epoxy resin sealer with or without the use of an acidic primer.

This study compared the apical leakage of roots obturated with gutta-percha using either a dual-cure resin based cement (Panavia F) or an epoxy-resin sealer (Thermaseal plus) with or without the application of an acidic primer (ED Primer). Eighty-six single rooted canine teeth were decoronated, cleaned, and shaped by using hand and rotary instruments, randomly divided into four groups, and obturated as follows: group A (n = 20): ED Primer applied followed by thermoplastized obturation with gutta-percha and Thermaseal Plus sealer; group B (n = 20): thermoplastized obturation with gutta-percha and Thermaseal Plus; group C (n = 20): ED primer applied followed by thermoplastized obturation with gutta-percha and Panavia F; group D (n = 20): thermoplastized obturation with gutta-percha and Panavia F. Both a negative control (n = 3; entire root coated with wax) and a positive control (n = 3; obturated with only a fitted master cone) were included in the study. Groups A, B, C, D, and the controls were immersed in molten sticky wax, leaving the apical 2-mm exposed, and quickly chilled. All teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue dye solution for 10 days, rinsed, and sectioned longitudinally. Apical dye penetration was measured stereomicroscopically at 10-fold magnification. The analysis of variance and Duncan Multiple Range were used for result analysis. The specimens obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy-resin sealer (with or without an acidic primer) demonstrated significantly less linear dye penetration than specimens obturated with gutta-percha and the dual-cure, resin-based cement (with or without an acidic primer).

Analysis of Variance↗

Comparative bond strengths of autopolymerising denture resin and light cured composite resin to denture teeth.

AIM: To investigate the shear bond strengths between light cured composite and autopolymerised acrylic resin bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. METHODS: Surface treatments were used for the denture teeth included wetting with methylmethacrylate (MMA) monomer, composite bonding agent and acid etching. The samples were divided into seven groups. Two groups of specimens were immersed in distilled water for 30 days to hydrate the teeth. Five other groups of embedded denture teeth were stored in air at room temperature for 30 days. RESULTS: Analysis of variance indicated statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The greatest bond strengths to denture teeth were in acrylic resins polymerised with pressure and wetted with monomer. The bond strengths of hydrated and unhydrated samples gave similar results both with acrylic resins and composites.

Acrylic Resins↗

Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of dentin bonding agents in reducing microleakage after three months in Class V restorations restored with Z100 resin composite. Materials tested were three types of resin-based dentin bonding agents: a multi-step (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose); a one-step (Scotchbond One-Step); a self-etching, self-priming (Clearfil Liner Bond) and a resin-modified glass ionomer (GC Fuji Bond LC). Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in cementum were prepared both on labial and lingual surfaces of extracted premolar teeth. Restorations (two per tooth) were distributed randomly into nine test groups (n = 10) consisting of the various DBAs applied with co-cure and pre-cure techniques, and no dentin bonding as a negative control group. Samples were stored in saline for three months, thermocycled, stained with silver nitrate, then sectioned through the middle of the preparation to facilitate the removal of the composite resin restoration. For groups treated with the pre-cure technique, the differences between the enamel leakage values of SBMP-control, CFLB-control and SB1S-control subgroups were significant (p < 0.05). For enamel leakage values of groups treated with the co-cure technique, the differences between the SBMP-control, SB1S-control, CFLB-control and Fuji LC-control subgroups were significant (p < 0.05). For cementum leakage values of groups treated with pre-cure technique, the difference between the CFLB-control and the Fuji, SBMP and SB1S groups was significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences could be detected between the cementum leakage values of groups treated with the co-cure technique (p > 0.05). The differences between the values obtained with application of CFLB with the pre-cure and co-cure techniques at the cementum margins were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). No statistically significant differences could be detected between the pre-cure and co-cure values of the other test materials. Generally for every group, cementum microleakage values were greater than enamel microleakage values (p < 0.05). The use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Scotchbond One-Step and Fuji Bond LC with the co-cure technique to decrease the application time did not cause any significant increase in microleakage. Only pre-curing using Clearfil Liner Bond provided better microleakage properties than the other pre-cured adhesives.

Analysis of Variance↗

Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of three low-viscosity resin systems (Unibond, Single Bond, and Fluorseal), used as rebonding agents, and a specific surface-penetrating sealant (Fortify) to prevent microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Fifty Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and the cervical margin in dentin and cementum were prepared on both the buccal and lingual surfaces of sound extracted premolars and restored with a hybrid light-cured resin composite. After finishing and polishing, restorations were randomly assigned to one of five equal groups (n = 10): a control, without surface sealing, and four experimental groups in which margins were etched and rebonded. Specimens were thermocycled, immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution, sectioned longitudinally, and analyzed for leakage at the occlusal and cervical interfaces. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed significantly less leakage at the enamel margins for all groups. Fortify and Unibond were statistically similar and provided better marginal sealing at dentin and cementum interfaces. Fluorseal showed the poorest ability to prevent microleakage. CONCLUSION: The rebonding technique may substantially minimize microleakage at dentin and cementum margins of composite restorations, when a resin system with sufficiently low viscosity is used as a surface sealant, regardless of whether it has been specified for such a purpose.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical performances of four polyacid-modified resin composites (F2000, Dyract AP, Compoglass F, and Elan) and one resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer) in Class V abrasion/erosion lesions. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Twenty restorations of each of the five restorative materials were placed in noncarious cervical abrasion/erosion lesions by one dentist. No cavity preparation was attempted. All teeth were isolated with cotton rolls and gingival retraction cord. The materials were manipulated according to the manufacturer's instructions and placed with the help of cervical matrixes. Restorations were finished and polished immediately after the placement. Evaluations were performed at baseline and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after placement for retention, color match, cavo-surface marginal discoloration, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity. RESULTS: Retention levels at 2 years were 90% for F2000, 90% for Dyract AP, 89% for Compoglass F, 84% for Elan, and 95% for the Vitremer restorations. No statistically significant differences were found among the materials after 2 years for any evaluation category. CONCLUSION: Polyacid-modified resin composite and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations showed acceptable clinical performance after 2 years.

Adult↗

Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study.

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of a single application of three professionally applied topical fluoride agents (Sodium fluoride 2%, Stannous fluoride 8% and APF 1.23%) on the surfaces of six modern esthetic restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry viz., two conventional glass ionomers (Fuji II and Shofu-restorative), two resin modified glass ionomers (Vitremer, with and without glaze, and Photac-fil Quick) and two Polyacid modified composite resins (Luxat and Hytac Aplitip). Mean surface roughness and surface micro hardness (SMH) measurements were the parameters employed for comparison. Results showed that APF gel applications significantly increased the surface roughness measurements and decreased SMH of all tested materials, which was pronounced in conventional glass ionomers when compared with resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins. NaF and SnF2 produced a statistically significant increase in the surface roughness of conventional glass ionomers without any significant change in surface roughness and SMH on rest of the materials tested, except for NaF on SMH values of Fuji II, which was statistically significant.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗

A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.

AIM: This study compared the shear bond strength of a light-cure resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement with a bis-GMA light-cure resin system in the bonding of stainless steel brackets to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces. METHODS: Porcelain surfaces were divided into 4 groups: group 1, deglazed porcelain surfaces with Transbond XT, group 2, glazed porcelain surfaces with Transbond XT; group 3, deglazed porcelain surfaces with Fuji Ortho LC; and group 4, porcelain surfaces with Fuji Ortho LC. Microetching with 50-microm aluminum oxide for 2 seconds at a distance of 5 mm deglazed the porcelain surfaces in groups 1 and 3. All brackets were bonded to the porcelain surfaces using the same procedure and light-cured for 40 seconds with a visible light. All samples were thermocycled between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 300 cycles before testing for shear bond strength with a universal testing machine. RESULTS: The analysis of variance showed no significant difference (P < .05) among the 4 groups; ie, group 1, 10.12 MPa; group 2, 7.00 MPa; group 3, 6.78 MPa; and group 4, 11.15 MPa. The F test also failed to demonstrate any statistical difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: Conditioning the porcelain surfaces with 37% phosphoric acid immediately followed by a nonhydrolyzed silane coupling agent resulted in clinically adequate bond strength when using either a composite resin or a resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement. Microetching of these porcelain surfaces apparently offers no bonding advantage.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin.

This study investigated the interfacial shear bond strength of a contaminated, aged, heat- and pressure-processed, indirect composite resin (Concept) repaired with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin (Heliomolar). Concept samples were aged by thermocycling and contaminated in tobacco juice. The bonding surfaces were prepared by sanding with 500-grit sandpaper or air abrading with 50-micron aluminum oxide. Prepared Concept surfaces received one or more of the following intermediary resin treatments before the addition of Heliomolar: Heliobond, Special Bond 2, All-Bond system, All-Bond bonding agent, or no bonding agent, and they were immediately thermocycled. Air abrasion produced significantly higher bond strengths than sanding for all intermediary resin surface treatments. The All-Bond-treated Concept surfaces showed the highest interfacial bond strengths within the air abraded and sanded groups. Visual and SEM examination of fractured repair surfaces indicated adhesive failure within all treatment groups.

Acrylates↗

Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations.

Calcium hydroxide has been used as a liner in resin composite restorations to protect the pulp. Recent research has demonstrated that pulpal inflammation is caused by microleakage of restorations and by the subsequent passage of bacteria. The present study involved scanning electron microscopic observation of cross-sections of resin composite-dentin interfaces after the interposition of a layer of calcium hydroxide. A new-generation adhesive system that involves etching of the dentin was used. Ultrastructural analysis indicated that polymerization shrinkage of the resin composite caused the separation of the calcium hydroxide from the dentinal surface, forming 8- to 15-micron-wide interfacial gaps in 100% of the areas studied. Where the adhesive was applied directly to dentin, it adhered closely, forming a gap-free attachment with evidence of an acid-resistant hybrid layer (4 to 6 microns in thickness) and resin tags of various lengths that hermetically sealed the dentinal tubules.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on in vitro wear of experimental hybrid resin composite.

While adding nonbonded nanofillers and lowering the viscosity of the resin matrix have shown success in reducing deleterious polymerization stresses in dental composites, their effects on wear resistance is unknown. This study evaluated abrasion and attrition wear of experimental composites with varied resin viscosities [inherent to varied ratios of TEGDMA:UDMA:bis-GMA (47:33:16 wt%; 30:33:33 wt%; 12:33:51 wt%)] and nanofiller surface treatment (12.6 wt% silanated or unsilanated silica: OX-50; 0.04 microm). Specimens (n = 6) were light cured, aged in water at 37 degrees C for 7 days, and evaluated in the new OHSU oral wear simulator (100,000 cycles). Nonbonded nanofiller increased abrasion and attrition in the low and medium viscosity composites. Increase in resin viscosity increased abrasion and attrition in composites containing silanated nanofiller, with equivocal effects in composites containing unsilanated nanofiller. Nonbonded nanofiller can lower the overall wear resistance of some composite formulations. Increasing resin viscosity generally lowers the wear resistance, but had minimal effect on composites containing nonbonded nanofiller.

Biocompatible Materials↗

1H high-resolution magic-angle spinning (HR-MAS) NMR analysis of ligand density on resins using a resin internal standard.

We recently attempted to generate an affinity chromatography adsorbent to purify cytochrome P450 4A1 by coupling 11-(1'-imidazolyl)-3,6,9-trioxaundecanoic acid to Toyopearl AF-Amino 650 M resin. Variations in ligand density for several resin batches were quantified by high-resolution magic-angle spinning (HR-MAS) NMR spectroscopy using a novel resin internal standard. The uniquely designed ImQ internal resin standard yields its signature resonance in a transparent region of the analyte spectrum making suppression of the polymer background unnecessary. This method enabled us to target a reasonable ligand density for enzyme purification and provides an advantageous alternative to quantitation against soluble standards or protonated solvent.

Animals↗

Marginal microleakage of resin-retained bridges in association with existing resin composite and amalgam restorations.

The aim of this study was to determine the microleakage associated with resin-retained bridge retainers cemented over amalgam and resin composite restorations. Cavities prepared on the labial surfaces of bovine incisors were restored with either amalgam or a posterior resin composite. Non-precious nickel-chromium alloy frameworks were then attached to the teeth by use of one of four cements: Conclude, ABC, Panavia Ex, and Superbond. The specimens were then stored for two weeks or six months, thermocycled, and tested for microleakage by use of a radioactive tracer and an autoradiographic technique. The results showed that more leakage was associated with the amalgam restorations than with the teeth filled with resin composite. Leakage scores increased with time with both the amalgam and composite restorations, except for the Panavia Ex and ABC materials, respectively.

Animals↗

The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers.

This study evaluated the effects on retention of three metal surface textures and four resin luting materials by measuring the magnitude of the force required for the removal of resin-bonded fixed partial denture retainers. The results of the study indicate that a retainer air-abraded with 250 mu aluminum oxide, used with any of the resins tested, should provide sufficient retention for single pontic posterior resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.

Acid Etching, Dental↗