Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Otoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Pacific Islands families study: the prevalence of chronic middle ear disease in 2-year-old Pacific children living in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic middle ear disease in 2-year-old Pacific children living in New Zealand. METHODS: The data were gathered as part of the Pacific Islands Families: First Two Years of Life (PIF) Study in which 1001 two year olds were screened using tympanometry to identify children at risk for otitis media with effusion (OME) and other otological disorders. Those failing the screening tests were referred to Manukau Superclinic where they had a further tympanometry test, and if they failed this test, were followed up with a comprehensive otological examination by an otolaryngologist using otomicroscopy and pneumatic otoscopy. RESULTS: Bilateral otitis media with effusion (OME) was the most common abnormality detected (N=102) with further cases of unilateral OME (N=8), and unilateral OME resolving (N=2). Other cases of OME were associated with acute otitis media (AOM), impacted wax (N=1), perforation (N=1), and mild retraction (N=2). Overall there were 118 children with unilateral or bilateral OME. AOM of any form was seen in nine cases. Retraction of the tympanic membrane was seen in 26 cases. The population prevalence among Pacific 2-year-old children was estimated as 25.4% for OME, 1.9% for AOM, and 26.9% for OME or AOM. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal that over 25% of Pacific Island 2-year-old were affected by OME and recommend the consideration of national screening for OME and other otological disorders at this earlier age.

Child, Preschool↗

High frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in children with and without middle ear dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) (9-16kHz) are a useful measure of the function of the cochlea, which may be damaged by ototoxic drugs during anticancer chemotherapy. As children undergoing chemotherapy may also have middle ear problems, it is necessary to know if middle ear problems would have a confounding effect on the ability of DPOAEs to assess cochlear function in the extend high frequency region (9-16kHz). The present study aimed to investigate the effect of middle ear dysfunction on DPOAEs in the extended high frequency region in young children. METHODS: The sample was comprised of 100 ears of 50 school-aged children (21 boys and 29 girls) with a mean age of 6.3 years (S.D.=0.5; range 5.3-7.3). Otoscopy, pure tone hearing screening, tympanometry, acoustic reflexes and DPOAEs for both the conventional and extended high frequencies were administered to each child under typical school screening conditions. Participants were classified into one of three groups based on immittance (tympanometry and acoustic reflex) results. They included a "pass immittance" group, a "fail immittance" group and an "undetermined" group (with a pass in either tympanometry or acoustic reflexes, but not both). DPOAE amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured and compared across the three groups of participants. RESULTS: The fail immittance group showed significantly smaller DPOAE amplitudes and SNRs when compared to the other two groups at frequencies ranging from 1 to 9.5kHz and at 13kHz, but not at 10, 11, 12 and 14kHz. There was no significant difference in DPOAE results between the pass immittance and undetermined groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the adverse effects of middle ear dysfunction, its effect on DPOAEs in the extended high frequency region was not as severe as that in the lower frequency region. Hence, assessment of cochlear function in children with a middle ear lesion in the extended high frequencies using DPOAEs should be made with caution.

Analysis of Variance↗

Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.

The clinical practice guideline on otitis media with effusion (OME) provides evidence-based recommendations on diagnosing and managing OME in children. This is an update of the 1994 clinical practice guideline "Otitis Media With Effusion in Young Children," which was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). In contrast to the earlier guideline, which was limited to children aged 1 to 3 years with no craniofacial or neurologic abnormalities or sensory deficits, the updated guideline applies to children aged 2 months through 12 years with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery selected a subcommittee composed of experts in the fields of primary care, otolaryngology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, hearing, speech and language, and advanced practice nursing to revise the OME guideline. The subcommittee made a strong recommendation that clinicians use pneumatic otoscopy as the primary diagnostic method and distinguish OME from acute otitis media (AOM). The subcommittee made recommendations that clinicians should (1) document the laterality, duration of effusion, and presence and severity of associated symptoms at each assessment of the child with OME; (2) distinguish the child with OME who is at risk for speech, language, or learning problems from other children with OME and more promptly evaluate hearing, speech, language, and need for intervention in children at risk; and (3) manage the child with OME who is not at risk with watchful waiting for 3 months from the date of effusion onset (if known), or from the date of diagnosis (if onset is unknown). The subcommittee also made recommendations that (4) hearing testing be conducted when OME persists for 3 months or longer, or at any time that language delay, learning problems, or a significant hearing loss is suspected in a child with OME; (5) children with persistent OME who are not at risk should be reexamined at 3- to 6-month intervals until the effusion is no longer present, significant hearing loss is identified, or structural abnormalities of the eardrum or middle ear are suspected; and (6) when a child becomes a surgical candidate, tympanostomy tube insertion is the preferred initial procedure. Adenoidectomy should not be performed unless a distinct indication exists (nasal obstruction, chronic adenoiditis); repeat surgery consists of adenoidectomy plus myringotomy, with or without tube insertion. Tonsillectomy alone or myringotomy alone should not be used to treat OME. The subcommittee made negative recommendations that (1) population-based screening programs for OME not be performed in healthy, asymptomatic children and (2) antihistamines and decongestants are ineffective for OME and should not be used for treatment; antimicrobials and corticosteroids do not have long-term efficacy and should not be used for routine management. The subcommittee gave as options that (1) tympanometry can be used to confirm the diagnosis of OME and (2) when children with OME are referred by the primary clinician for evaluation by an otolaryngologist, audiologist, or speech-language pathologist, the referring clinician should document the effusion duration and specific reason for referral (evaluation, surgery), and provide additional relevant information such as history of AOM and developmental status of the child. The subcommittee made no recommendations for (1) complementary and alternative medicine as a treatment for OME based on a lack of scientific evidence documenting efficacy and (2) allergy management as a treatment for OME based on insufficient evidence of therapeutic efficacy or a causal relationship between allergy and OME. Last, the panel compiled a list of research needs based on limitations of the evidence reviewed. The purpose of this guideline is to inform clinicians of evidence-based methods to identify methods to identify, monitor, and manage OME in children aged 2 months through 12 years. The guideline may not apply to children older than 12 years because OME is uncommon and the natural history is likely to differ from younger children who experience rapid developmental change. The target population includes children with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The guideline is intended for use by providers of health care to children, including primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, audiologists, speech-language pathologists, and child development specialists. The guideline is applicable to any setting in which children with OME would be identified, monitored, or managed. This guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in evaluating children with OME. Rather, it is designed to assist primary care and other clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all children with this condition, and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Otoacoustic emissions in young adults with a history of otitis media.

The aim of this study was to investigate otoacoustic emissions in young adults who had a history of otitis media (OM) in childhood and to assess whether a history of OM had an irreversible effect on hearing. We studied 116 cases between 15 and 25 years of age, divided into three groups. Each subject underwent a single examination comprising otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry (PTA), tympanometry, and transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) testing. Subjects in the first and second groups had normal audiometric hearing thresholds and type A tympanograms. The only difference between the first and second group was the presence or absence of a history of OM. The third group consisted of patients diagnosed as having active OM; these patients had poorer hearing thresholds and type B or C tympanograms. After statistical analysis of TEOAE and DPOAE results (one-way analysis of variance test), significant differences were noted between groups. Otoacoustic emission levels were, unsurprisingly, lowest in the third group, as expected. However, the most striking result in the study was that significantly fewer otoacoustic emissions were detected in subjects with a history of OM than in subjects without a history of OM. These findings suggest that OM in childhood may cause minor but irreversible damage to the middle ear or cochlea. Otoacoustic emissions testing can be used to detect this sub-clinical damage.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

[The red tympanic membrane].

An otoscopic red tympanic membrane is for the examiner a challenge. A short directed history, as well as a few functional examinations associated to a systematic otoscopy allow in most cases to make the otological diagnosis. The differential diagnosis for a red tympanic membrane is very large, including malformations, traumas, infections, and even tumors and other degenerative pathologies. The first diagnosis to think about is an infectious disease. On the other side, there are rare pathologies which, even for experienced examiners are quite seldom.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Otitis techniques to improve practice.

Successful management of otitis externa requires recognition of changes in the anatomy and physiology of the external and middle ear, as well as the adequate tools and examinations to detect changes from normal. Otoscopy and methods for assessing the normalcy of the tympanum, collection of samples for cytologic evaluation or culture, and myringotomy are diagnostic techniques important in practice. Treatment tubes and intralesional triamcinolone injections are techniques that improve the response in some cases.

Animals↗

Detection of middle-ear fluid in children with spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry: a screening tool for nurses?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) in the hands of nurses in screening children for middle-ear fluid (MEF). DESIGN: Prospective, blinded study. SETTING: A satellite study within the Finnish Otitis Media Vaccine Trial in primary care in 1995-99. PATIENTS: Some 739 ear examinations among a cohort of 271 children under the age of 2 years during different healthcare contacts (acute sick visits, check-up visits after otitis media, and scheduled healthy control visits at 24 months of age). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Specificity, sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values of SG-AR performed by nurses in detecting MEF using pneumatic otoscopy by trained physicians as a reference. RESULTS: SG-AR was successful in 585 (79%) ears. None of the cut-off points assessed resulted in both excellent sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, at the sick visits, positive predictive values at 50 and 60 degrees were as high as 94% and 89%, respectively. However, negative predictive value for the cut-off point of 100 degrees was considerably lower, at 75%. At the non-acute visits, negative predictive values were excellent. CONCLUSION: SG-AR is a useful device for nurses in screening MEF among children. It detects ears with both very high and very low probability of MEF and is especially effective in detecting MEF during sick visits and in ruling out MEF among non-acute patients. We recommend the use of the SG-AR cut-off point of 60 degrees as a sign of MEF when screening sick children, and the cut-off point of 100 degrees as a sign of a healthy ear among non-symptomatic patients.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Point prevalence of barotitis and its prevention and treatment with nasal balloon inflation: a prospective, controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: The most common cause of barotitis is pressure changes induced during descent in aviation. The incidence after air flight has been reported to vary from 8% to 17%. OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to estimate the incidence of barotitis after flight, to evaluate whether the incidence of barotitis can be reduced by nasal balloon inflation during descent, and, finally, to estimate the effect of nasal balloon inflation in case of negative middle ear pressure after landing. STUDY DESIGN: Aircraft passengers were examined by otoscopy and tympanometry before and after flying and filled in a questionnaire inquiring about ear problems. On half of the flights, the passengers were asked to inflate a nasal balloon during descent, whereas the other half were control flights. RESULTS: A total of 188 passengers filled in the questionnaire. Of these, 134 were examined before and after the flight. Otoscopic signs of barotitis were found in 15% of the ears in the control group compared with 6% in the balloon inflation group. In ears with a negative pressure after flying, the pressure could be equalized by Valsalva's maneuver in 46%. Passengers who were unable to equalize the pressure in this way inflated a nasal balloon, and in 69%, this maneuver cleared the middle ear pressure. CONCLUSION: The incidence of barotitis in this study of aircraft passengers was 14%. This figure could be reduced to 6% in passengers who performed nasal balloon inflation during descent. We recommend nasal balloon autoinflation in aircraft passengers who have difficulty clearing their ears during and after flying.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.

OBJECTIVES: To discuss appropriate and inappropriate methods for comparing distributions of hearing thresholds of a study group with distributions in population standards and to determine whether the thresholds of Washington State Ferries engineers are different from those of men in the general population, using both frequency-by-frequency comparisons and analysis of audiometric shape. DESIGN: The most recent hearing conservation program audiograms of 321 noise-exposed engineers, ages 35 to 64, were compared with the predictions of Annexes A, B, and C from ANSI S3.44. There was no screening by history or otoscopy; all audiograms were included. 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the engineers' median thresholds for each ear, for the better ear (defined two ways), and for the binaural average. For Annex B, where 95% CIs are also available, it was possible to calculate z scores for the differences between Annex B and the engineers' better ears. Bulge depth, an audiometric shape statistic, measured curvature between 1 and 6 kHz. RESULTS: Engineers' better-ear median thresholds were worse than those in Annex A but (except at 1 kHz) were as good as or better than those in Annexes B and C, which are more appropriate for comparison to an unscreened noise-exposed group like the engineers. Average bulge depth for the engineers was similar to that of the Annex B standard (no added occupational noise) and was much less than that of audiograms created by using the standard with added occupational noise between 90 and 100 dBA. CONCLUSIONS: Audiograms from groups that have been selected for a particular exposure, but, without regard to severity, can appropriately be compared with population standards, if certain pitfalls are avoided. For unscreened study groups with large age-sex subgroups, a simple method to assess statistical significance, taking into consideration uncertainties in both the study group and the comparison standard, is the calculation of z scores for the proportion of better-ear thresholds above the Annex B median. A less powerful method combines small age-sex subgroups after age correction. Small threshold differences, even if statistically significant, may not be due to genuine differences in hearing sensitivity between study group and standard. Audiometric shape analysis offers an independent dimension of comparison between the study group and audiograms predicted from the ANSI S3.44 standard, with and without occupational noise exposure. Important pitfalls in comparison to population standards include nonrandom selection of study groups, inappropriate choice of population standard, use of the right and left ear thresholds instead of the better-ear threshold for comparison to Annex B, and comparing means with medians. The thresholds of the engineers in this study were similar to published standards for an unscreened population.

Adult↗

Otoscopic and tympanometric findings in acute otitis media yielding dry tap at tympanocentesis.

BACKGROUND: The value of tympanometry in detection of middle ear effusion (MEE) has been widely studied in otitis media with effusion. There has been no direct comparison of tympanometric and tympanocentesis (TAP) findings in acute otitis media (AOM). We compared otoscopic, tympanometric and TAP findings in AOM including cases of AOM without effusion. METHODS: In a study of AOM treatment of 90 children, a tympanogram was obtained, and TAP was performed before and after 5 days of treatment. Subjects were followed with otoscopy and tympanometry every 2 weeks for 3 months or until the MEE cleared. RESULTS: In 130 AOM ears, otoscopic, tympanometric and TAP findings were available; MEE was obtained from 110 ears. Of 20 ears with a dry tap, 18 had abnormal tympanogram and otoscopic findings. With TAP findings as the standard, sensitivity and positive predictive value of type B tympanogram were 97 and 87%, respectively. Of 18 AOM ears yielding dry tap, 2 yielded MEE 5 days later, and 8 continued with evidence of MEE 5 days-12 weeks later. Five subjects with 8 AOM ears yielding dry tap were lost to follow-up; all had short duration of clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although otoscopic and tympanometric findings suggested the presence of MEE in AOM, MEE was unobtainable by TAP in 14% of cases. Dry tap cases likely represent early AOM before accumulation of detectable MEE. However, technical difficulty in obtaining small amounts of or highly viscous MEE could not be excluded. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of abnormal tympanograms in detection of MEE in AOM cases are comparable with those in otitis media with effusion.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Alternobaric vertigo--really a hazard?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of alternobaric vertigo (AV) in sport divers and to find out whether AV led to dangerous situations underwater. Furthermore, to examine whether objective neurootologic tests are associated with the manifestation of AV. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three sport divers with an average diving experience of 10 years and 650 dives were questioned regarding their medical and diving history and the manifestation of vertigo during diving. METHODS: Microscopic otoscopy, tympanometry, stapedius reflexes, hearing threshold for air and bone conduction, caloric video-oculography including analysis of the slow-phase velocity of the nystagmus, acoustic brain stem responses, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed to find possible differences between divers with and without AV. RESULTS: We found 17 divers with AV (27%). There was no significant difference in all measured parameters apart from sex and history of middle ear equalization difficulty in divers with AV. Ten (59%) of 17 female divers and 7 (15%) of 46 male divers experienced AV, representing a significant sex difference (p < 0.001). Correlation with our divers' outpatient clinic revealed that female divers had a significantly higher incidence of middle ear equalization disorders which could be an explanation for the predominance of female divers with symptoms of AV. None of the divers reported any dangerous or life-threatening situations following AV. Whether AV leads to dangerous situations underwater remains unclear, but this hypothesis is not supported by our data. CONCLUSION: Alternobaric vertigo is a common finding in divers. In our study group, female divers had a four-time higher risk to suffer AV. Our data do not support the thesis that AV is a life-threatening condition.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Effect of adenotonsillectomy on middle ear status in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of adenotonsillectomy as compared with watchful waiting on the middle ear status of children. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We recruited 300 children between 2 and 8 years of age who were selected for adenotonsillectomy according to current medical practice. Excluded from the trial were children with very frequent throat infections (more than 6 per year) or obstructive sleep apnea. Participants were randomly assigned to either adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting. Main outcome measure was the percentage of children with unilateral or bilateral otitis media diagnosed at the scheduled follow-up visits according to an algorithm combining tympanometry and otoscopy. RESULTS: The percentages of children in the adenotonsillectomy and watchful waiting group diagnosed with otitis media at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 27.7 versus 30.5, 16.8 versus 25.2, 18.3 versus 21.2, 12.3 versus 15.2, 17.6 versus 15.5, and 14.7 versus 10.3%, respectively (P < .10). In the subgroup of children selected for adenotonsillectomy predominantly because of recurrent or persistent otitis media, hearing loss, or recurrent upper respiratory tract infections (n = 111) and in the subgroup of children diagnosed with otitis media at inclusion (n = 82), the occurrence of otitis media did not differ significantly between the adenotonsillectomy and watchful waiting group during the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in a large proportion of children selected for adenotonsillectomy according to current medical practice, including those with otitis media or related complaints, no beneficial effect of adenotonsillectomy on middle ear status is to be expected.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

C3H/HeJ mouse model for spontaneous chronic otitis media.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Chronic otitis media is a significant clinical problem. Understanding the mechanisms of chronic otitis media is critical for its control. However, little is known of these processes as a result of lack of animal models of spontaneous otitis media. The C3H/HeJ mouse has a single amino acid substitution in its toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), making it insensitive to endotoxin. As a result, these mice cannot clear Gram-negative bacteria. The chronically inflamed middle ear in this animal provides us the opportunity to study spontaneous chronic otitis media. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Otoscopy and auditory brain response (ABR) evaluation of C3H/HeJ mice at 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 months were carried out under sedation. At 12 months of age, mice were killed and histologic analysis of the middle ear, inner ear, and eustachian tube was carried out. RESULTS: Tympanic membrane visualization and ABR thresholds in 7- to 8-month-old C3H/HeJ mice showed that approximately half developed middle and inner ear disease spontaneously. The significant elevation of thresholds suggested a sensorineural component in addition to the conductive loss. Middle and inner ear histology showed some degree of middle and inner ear inflammation in half the mice, paralleling the ABR data. CONCLUSIONS: The histopathologic changes reported here in the C3H/HeJ mouse model of chronic otitis media have been reported in human chronic otitis media. This spontaneous model of chronic otitis media will be valuable for the characterization of middle and inner ear inflammatory disease processes that are induced by middle ear infections.

Animals↗

A non-randomized comparison of earwax removal with a 'do-it-yourself' ear vacuum kit and a Jobson-Horne probe.

OBJECTIVES: Do-it-yourself ear vacuum kits (ear vacs) have recently been introduced as an effective method of earwax removal. This study assesses the efficacy of ear vacs in comparison with a conventional mechanical method of earwax removal, the Jobson-Horne probe. METHODS: Forty healthy relatives who had accompanied family members to orthopaedic and haematology clinics were screened with otoscopy. Sixteen participants with earwax were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) Weight of earwax removed, (ii) proportion of tympanic membrane visible before and after each intervention, (iii) participants' subjective assessment of any improvement in hearing. Suction pressure generated by the ear vac was also compared with that of microsuctioning. RESULTS: No earwax was removed with the ear vac but the Jobson-Horne probe was significantly more effective at removing a greater weight of earwax (P < 0.001, mean weight 92.4 mg). There was no improvement in visibility of the tympanic membrane after the ear vac but the Jobson-Horne probe restored visibility to 100% (P < 0.001). No participant felt that there was an improvement in their hearing after the ear vac, but the majority (88%) reported an improvement in their hearing after the Jobson-Horne probe. CONCLUSION: A Jobson-Horne probe is significantly more effective than an ear vac for the removal of earwax.

Adult↗

Otoscopic, cytological, and microbiological examination of the equine external ear canal.

Otoscopic examination and cytology of the equine ear would be beneficial in diseases such as head trauma, headshaking, otitis externa secondary to otitis media, vestibular disease, aural neoplasia and aural pruritus secondary to parasites. In practice, otic examinations of horses are rarely done due to the perceived difficulty in visualizing the equine external ear canal and tympanic membrane, as well as the need for chemical restraint. In this study, the proximal external ear canal was examined in live horses using a handheld otoscope and in cadaver heads using video otoscopy. Visualization of the proximal ear canal of the sedated horse could be done with a handheld otoscope, but more sedation or general anaesthesia and a video otoscope would be required to adequately visualize the tympanic membrane in the live horse. The proximal ear canals of 18 horses were examined cytologically and cultured aerobically. In three horses, both ears were sampled. No cells or organisms were seen on cytological examination of 11/21 ears. Nine of the 21 ears were sterile when cultured. Ten of the 21 ears had mixed growth with low numbers of organisms (Corynebacterium sp. being most common). Two of the 21 ears had heavy growth of a single organism (Corynebacterium sp. and Staphylococcus intermedius, respectively). Equine cadaver heads were examined in cross-section by computed tomography (CT) imaging and histopathology in order to further understand the anatomy of the equine external ear canal. Equine practitioners should be aware that otic examination is possible and may provide important diagnostic information.

Animals↗

Otitis media with effusion.

The clinical practice guideline on otitis media with effusion (OME) provides evidence-based recommendations on diagnosing and managing OME in children. This is an update of the 1994 clinical practice guideline "Otitis Media With Effusion in Young Children," which was developed by the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). In contrast to the earlier guideline, which was limited to children 1 to 3 years old with no craniofacial or neurologic abnormalities or sensory deficits, the updated guideline applies to children aged 2 months through 12 years with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery selected a subcommittee composed of experts in the fields of primary care, otolaryngology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, hearing, speech and language, and advanced-practice nursing to revise the OME guideline. The subcommittee made a strong recommendation that clinicians use pneumatic otoscopy as the primary diagnostic method and distinguish OME from acute otitis media. The subcommittee made recommendations that clinicians should 1) document the laterality, duration of effusion, and presence and severity of associated symptoms at each assessment of the child with OME, 2) distinguish the child with OME who is at risk for speech, language, or learning problems from other children with OME and more promptly evaluate hearing, speech, language, and need for intervention in children at risk, and 3) manage the child with OME who is not at risk with watchful waiting for 3 months from the date of effusion onset (if known) or diagnosis (if onset is unknown). The subcommittee also made recommendations that 4) hearing testing be conducted when OME persists for 3 months or longer or at any time that language delay, learning problems, or a significant hearing loss is suspected in a child with OME, 5) children with persistent OME who are not at risk should be reexamined at 3- to 6-month intervals until the effusion is no longer present, significant hearing loss is identified, or structural abnormalities of the eardrum or middle ear are suspected, and 6) when a child becomes a surgical candidate (tympanostomy tube insertion is the preferred initial procedure). Adenoidectomy should not be performed unless a distinct indication exists (nasal obstruction, chronic adenoiditis); repeat surgery consists of adenoidectomy plus myringotomy with or without tube insertion. Tonsillectomy alone or myringotomy alone should not be used to treat OME. The subcommittee made negative recommendations that 1) population-based screening programs for OME not be performed in healthy, asymptomatic children, and 2) because antihistamines and decongestants are ineffective for OME, they should not be used for treatment; antimicrobials and corticosteroids do not have long-term efficacy and should not be used for routine management. The subcommittee gave as options that 1) tympanometry can be used to confirm the diagnosis of OME and 2) when children with OME are referred by the primary clinician for evaluation by an otolaryngologist, audiologist, or speech-language pathologist, the referring clinician should document the effusion duration and specific reason for referral (evaluation, surgery) and provide additional relevant information such as history of acute otitis media and developmental status of the child. The subcommittee made no recommendations for 1) complementary and alternative medicine as a treatment for OME, based on a lack of scientific evidence documenting efficacy, or 2) allergy management as a treatment for OME, based on insufficient evidence of therapeutic efficacy or a causal relationship between allergy and OME. Last, the panel compiled a list of research needs based on limitations of the evidence reviewed. The purpose of this guideline is to inform clinicians of evidence-based methods to identify, monitor, and manage OME in children aged 2 months through 12 years. The guideline may not apply to children more than 12 years old, because OME is uncommon and the natural history is likely to differ from younger children who experience rapid developmental change. The target population includes children with or without developmental disabilities or underlying conditions that predispose to OME and its sequelae. The guideline is intended for use by providers of health care to children, including primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, audiologists, speech-language pathologists, and child-development specialists. The guideline is applicable to any setting in which children with OME would be identified, monitored, or managed. This guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in evaluating children with OME. Rather, it is designed to assist primary care and other clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all children with this condition and may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

Evaluation of outcome of otitis media after lavage of the tympanic bulla and long-term antimicrobial drug treatment in dogs: 44 cases (1998-2002).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of otitis media in dogs after video-otoscopic lavage of the tympanic bulla and long-term antimicrobial drug treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: 44 dogs with otitis media treated in an academic referral practice. PROCEDURE: Medical records were reviewed for signalment, duration of ear canal disease, previous medical treatments, dermatologic diagnosis, results of cytologic examination and microbial culture of ear canal exudate, findings during video-otoscopy, medical treatment, days to resolution, and maintenance treatments prescribed. Four independent variables (age, duration of ear canal disease prior to referral, use of corticosteroids in treatment regimens, and infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were evaluated statistically for potential influence on time to resolution. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD (range) duration of ear canal disease prior to referral was 24.9 +/- 21.6 (3 to 84) months. Otitis media in 36 dogs resolved after lavage of the tympanic bulla and medical management; mean +/- SD (range) time to resolution was 117 +/- 86.7 (30 to 360) days. Time to resolution was not significantly influenced by any variable evaluated. Three dogs were lost to follow-up, and 4 dogs eventually required surgical intervention. Seven of 36 dogs in which otitis had resolved relapsed; 4 required additional lavage procedures. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that lavage of the tympanic bulla combined with medical management is an effective and viable option for treatment of otitis media in dogs.

Animals↗

Middle ear problems in Aboriginal school children cause developmental and educational concerns.

An epidemiological study was carried out in the year 2000 and sought to measure the occurrences of middle ear disease and hearing loss within school aged (4 years to 12 years) Aboriginal children. A number of the local schools and preschools in Coraki and Lismore with a high percentage of Aboriginal students were selected in an effort to identify service gaps regarding essential hearing screenings and assessments. A total of 185 (370 ears) Aboriginal children aged 4 years to 12 years were examined from four schools and three preschools. This examination included otoscopy, tympanometry and audiometry. Data were collected as each child was tested and this was then entered into a computer database on returning to the work place. Results indicated that 61.08% of these children had middle ear problems of some type. Unilateral hearing loss of 30 dB or greater was found in 10.80% of children, bilateral hearing loss of 30 dB and greater was found in 22.16%, and perforation of tympanic membranes in 3.24%. Suggestions are made in relation to the need for ongoing training of Aboriginal Community Audiometrists to provide community, school and preschool screening programs together with health related promotional activities to minimise the occurrences of ear infections.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗