Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Neonatal”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

A focus of care for neonatal nursing: the relationship between neonatal nursing practice and outcomes. Part 1.

The developmental outcomes of survivors of neonatal intensive care are, in part, a measurement of the quality of care provision. The relationship between neonatal nursing practice and long-term outcomes of survivors remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the focus of care currently influencing qualified neonatal nurses' practice, to ascertain if nursing care is provided in response to the developmental needs and consequent future quality of life of high risk babies. Following a detailed literature review, a case study combining semi-structured interviews with documentary evidence was undertaken within a regional neonatal intensive care unit. The primary focus for the study was the perspective of qualified neonatal nurses working in the field. This first part of a two-part report, presents the background, aims, literature review and design of the study. The findings, discussion and conclusion will be presented in the June issue.

Child Development↗

Comparison of neonatal nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and residents in the neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient care delivery by neonatal nurse practitioners and physician assistants with that of pediatric residents in the intensive care setting. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review after developing specific performance criteria, namely, patient management, outcome, and charges. METHODS/MATERIALS: Charts for 244 consecutive admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit in Jacksonville, Fla, were reviewed. Patients were cared for by one of two teams, one staffed by residents and the other by neonatal nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Similar patients were cared for by the two teams, as determined by patient background characteristics and diagnostic variables. Performance of the two teams was assessed by comparison of patient management, outcome, and charges. Management variables included data on length of critical care and hospital stay, ventilator and oxygen use, total parenteral nutritional use, number of transfusions, and the performance of various procedures. Outcome variables included the incidence of air leaks, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, and number of infants who died. Charge variables included hospital and physician charges. MAIN RESULTS: Results demonstrated no significant differences in management, outcome, or charge variables between patients cared for by the two teams. CONCLUSION: Neonatal nurse practitioners and physician assistants are an effective alternative to residents for patient care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Florida↗

Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates.

The incidence of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is high compared with other wards. However, no definitions for hospital-acquired infection are available for NICUs. The aim of this study was to measure the incidence of such infections and to identify risk factors in the NICU of the VU University Medical Center, which serves as a level III regional NICU. For this purpose, a prospective surveillance was performed in 1998-2000. We designed definitions by adjusting the current definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for children <1 year of age. Birth weight was stratified into four categories and other baseline risk factors were dichotomized. Analysis of risk factors was performed by Cox regression with time-dependent variables. The relationship between the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) and nosocomial infection was investigated. Furthermore, for a random sample of cases, we determined whether bloodstream infection and pneumonia would also have been identified with the CDC definitions. Seven hundred and forty-two neonates were included in the study. One hundred and ninety-one neonates developed 264 infections. Bloodstream infection (N=138, 14.9/1000 patient-days) and pneumonia (N=69, 7.5/1000 patient-days) were the most common infections. Of bloodstream infections, 59% were caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci; in 21% of neonates, blood cultures remained negative. In 25% of pneumonias, Enterobacteriaceae were the causative micro-organisms; 26% of cultures remained negative. Compared with the Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) of the CDC, our device utilization ratios and device-associated nosocomial infection rates were high. The main risk factors for bloodstream infection were birth weight [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-2.17] and parenteral feeding with hospital-pharmacy-produced, all-in-one mixture 'Minimix' (HR 3.69, 95%CI 2.03-6.69); administration of intravenous antibiotics (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.26-0.56) was a protective risk factor. The main risk factors for pneumonia were low birth weight (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.01-1.85) and mechanical ventilation (HR 9.69, 95%CI 4.60-20.4); intravenous antibiotics were protective (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.21-0.64). In a subcohort of 232 very-low-birthweight neonates, the CRIB was not predictive for infection. With the CDC criteria, only 75% (21/28) of bloodstream infections and 87.5% of pneumonias (21/24) would have been identified. In conclusion, our local nosocomial infection rates are high compared with those of NICUs participating in the NNIS. This can be partially explained by: (1) the use of our definitions for nosocomial infection, which are more suitable for this patient category; and (2) the high device utilization ratios.

Bacteremia↗

Neonatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis in a cohort of 165 women infected during pregnancy and influence of in utero treatment on the results of neonatal tests.

The aim of this study was to determine the performances of methods used for the neonatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. We included 165 pregnant women infected during pregnancy over a 10-year period. Fifty-seven cases of congenital toxoplasmosis were demonstrated (34.5%). Neonatal diagnosis gave positive results in 50 cases (88%). Parasites were isolated from placenta or cord blood in 61% of the infected newborns, more frequently from placenta (60%) than from cord blood (43%). This method was the only criterion of infection in 18% of these infected infants. The detection of specific IgM and IgA antibodies performed on 42 sera of infected infants allowed the diagnosis of congenital infection in 34 cases (81%). IgA antibodies were more frequently detected (60%) than specific IgM (50%). Neonatal and prenatal screening were carried out for 143 pregnant women. This combination diagnosed 39 of 40 infected infants (98%). Prenatal diagnosis identified 30 of 40 cases (75%). Nine cases were diagnosed through neonatal screening and one case with the postnatal follow-up. When prenatal diagnosis was positive, pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine were administered to the mothers (25 cases) in addition to spiramycin. Toxoplasma gondii was less frequently isolated in the placenta and the cord blood of these women (32% and 19%, respectively) than in women treated by spiramycin alone (83% and 63%) proving the antiparasitic action of these drugs. In conclusion, neonatal screening combining parasite detection in placenta and immunological methods on cord blood is essential particularly when prenatal diagnosis is negative. Therefore, when this diagnosis is positive, a treatment with pyrimethamine and sulfamide can be started in the first month of life.

Animals↗

Neonatal cerebral infarction: an under recognised/unreconised cause of neonatal seizures?

Neonatal cerebral infarction or neonatal stroke is a well recognised cause of neonatal seizures. The awareness of its existence among healthcare workers is low and it is not even mentioned as a cause of neonatal seizures in most books. Many of the affected neonates are well, without any evidence of neurological disturbances between seizures. Awareness of its existence among healthcare workers is critical for the diagnosis of this problem. Early diagnosis can lead to early intervention, which may mean a better prognosis for these children.

Cerebral Infarction↗

Antenatal magnesium treatment and neonatal illness severity as measured by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP).

OBJECTIVE: . To determine if antepartum administration of magnesium sulfate affects the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP). METHODS: We reviewed a database of consecutive preterm admissions to our neonatal intensive care unit over a 12-month period. Information on delivery indication, magnesium sulfate use, betamethasone administration, neonatal SNAP scores, neonatal serum magnesium levels, and other data was collected. Data was analyzed by Chi-square, Student t-test, and multiple linear regression with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: During the study period, 221 cases fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Multiple regression revealed a significant association between antepartum magnesium use and improved SNAP scores after controlling for gestational age, glucocorticoid use, chorioamnionitis, and birthweight (SNAP score reduction = -2.25 +/- 0.78, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Antepartum administration of magnesium sulfate results in a significant improvement in the neonatal SNAP score. These results suggest that antepartum magnesium sulfate may be protective, or at least not detrimental to the newborn infant.

Cohort Studies↗

Use of neonatal intensive care unit as a safe place for neonatal surgery.

AIM: To evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, and short term morbidity and mortality of major surgical interventions performed in the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: A retrospective case review of 45 neonates was performed from April 1991 to September 1995. The characteristics of the patients were: gestational age 29 (SD 4) weeks (range 24 to 41 weeks); birth-weight 1305 (870) g (range 540 to 4040 g); presurgical weight 1430 (895) g (range 550 to 4370 g); postconceptional age at surgery 31 (4) weeks (26 to 47 weeks). The indications for surgery were: ligation of patent ductus arteriosus (n = 16); insertion of a subcutaneous ventricular catheter reservoir for hydrocephalus (n = 14); repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 2); open lung biopsy (n = 1); and laparotomies (because of necrotising enterocolitis, anorectal malformations, and intestinal obstructions) (n = 12). The management of these neonates at laparotomy was: bowel resection with stomas (n = 8) and stomas (n = 4). No specially designed area was used to perform surgery. RESULTS: Local or systemic infection associated with surgery was not seen and no perioperative mortality was related to the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The neonatal intensive care unit is suitable for major surgery during the neonatal period and no special area is needed to perform complication free surgery.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Risk adjusted and population based studies of the outcome for high risk infants in Scotland and Australia. International Neonatal Network, Scottish Neonatal Consultants, Nurses Collaborative Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of care in selected neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for very low birthweight (VLBW) or preterm infants in Scotland and Australia (study 1) and perinatal care for all VLBW infants in both countries (study 2). DESIGN: Study 1: risk adjusted cohort study; study 2: population based cohort study. SUBJECTS: Study 1: all 2621 infants of < 1500 g birth weight or < 31 weeks' gestation admitted to a volunteer sample of hospitals comprising eight of all 17 Scottish NICUs and six of all 12 tertiary NICUs in New South Wales and Queensland in 1993-1994; study 2: all 5986 infants of 500-1499 g birth weight registered as live born in Scotland and Australia in 1993-1994. MAIN OUTCOMES: Study 1: (a) hospital death; (b) death or cerebral damage, each adjusted for gestation and CRIB (clinical risk index for babies); study 2: neonatal (28 day) mortality. RESULTS: Study 1. Data were obtained for 1628 admissions in six Australian NICUs, 775 in five Scottish tertiary NICUs, and 148 in three Scottish non-tertiary NICUs. Crude hospital death rates were 13%, 22%, and 22% respectively. Risk adjusted hospital mortality was about 50% higher in Scottish than in Australian NICUs (adjusted mortality ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 1.63, p < 0.001). There was no difference in risk adjusted outcomes between Scottish tertiary and non-tertiary NICUs. After risk adjustment, death or cerebral damage was more common in Scottish than Australian NICUs (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.5). Both these risk adjusted adverse outcomes remained more common in Scottish than Australian NICUs after excluding all infants < 28 weeks' gestation from the comparison. Study 2. Population based neonatal mortality in infants of 500-1499 g was higher in Scotland (20.3%) than Australia (16.6%) (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 1. 39, p = 0.002). In a post hoc analysis, neonatal mortality was also higher in England and Wales than in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Study 1: outcome was better in the Australian NICUs. Study 2: perinatal outcome was better in Australia. Both results may be consistent, at least in part, with differences in the organisation and implementation of neonatal care.

Australia↗

Prediction of outcome at school age in neonatal intensive care unit graduates using neonatal neurologic tools.

Prediction of outcome for neonatal intensive care unit graduates is clinically useful to counsel families effectively and target those who may benefit from early interventions. Evoked potentials have proven prognostic value of neurologic outcomes in early childhood; however, their long-term predictive validity remains to be determined. The objective of this prospective study was to determine the long-term predictive value of three neonatal neurologic assessments: brainstem auditory evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale. Seventy-eight high-risk newborns and 28 healthy controls were recruited and were assessed in the newborn period using these tests. At 8 to 9 years of age, 42 subjects and 13 controls were re-evaluated for developmental progress using a range of psychologic, sensorimotor, and neurologic measures. Findings indicated that the somatosensory evoked potential was most accurate at predicting outcome at school age, with high specificity (83-100%) across all domains tested and good sensitivity (80-100%) for intellectual performance and sensorimotor abilities. The brainstem auditory evoked potential was limited by false-negatives, whereas the neonatal neurobehavioral assessment yielded many false-positives. This study provides new evidence that associations between neonatal somatosensory evoked potentials and developmental sequelae continue to be significant at school age.

Brain Diseases↗

Neonatal screening for very long-chain acyl-coA dehydrogenase deficiency: enzymatic and molecular evaluation of neonates with elevated C14:1-carnitine levels.

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal screening programs for very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency have been implemented recently in various countries. Mildly elevated C14:1-carnitine on day 3 of life strongly suggests very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency. DESIGN: We characterized 11 neonates with elevated C14:1-carnitine by enzyme and molecular analyses. Palmitoyl-coenzyme A oxidation was measured in lymphocytes. Sequencing of all 20 exons of the VLCAD gene was performed from genomic DNA. RESULTS: Palmitoyl-coenzyme A oxidation revealed significantly decreased residual activities consistent with very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency in 7 neonates. In 2 individuals, residual activities of 48% and 44%, respectively, suggested heterozygosity. Two disease-causing mutations were detected in 6 of 7 neonates with very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency; in the remaining 1 patient, only 1 mutation was identified. Of 2 individuals with residual activities consistent with heterozygosity, 1 was heterozygous for a VLCAD mutation. The other child and both individuals with normal palmitoyl-coenzyme A oxidation had normal genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In 4 of 11 neonates identified with elevated C14:1-carnitine, very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency was excluded. A C14:1-carnitine level > 1 micromol/L strongly suggests very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency, whereas concentrations < or = 1 micromol/L do not allow a clear discrimination among affected patients, carriers, and healthy individuals. Further diagnostic evaluation, including enzyme and molecular analyses, is essential to identify very long-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency correctly.

Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase, Long-Chain↗

Validation of the Pain Assessment in Neonates (PAIN) scale with the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).

PURPOSE: To establish the validity and clinical usefulness of a modified pain assessment scale, the Pain Assessment in Neonates (PAIN) scale. DESIGN: Correlational design to compare scores obtained on the PAIN with scores obtained on the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). SAMPLE: A convenience sample of 196 neonates from an NICU and a step-down unit with gestational ages of 26 to 47 weeks. METHOD: Bedside nurses observed the neonates for two minutes and then scored their responses on both scales. The scales were scored sequentially and in a randomized order. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Correlation of individual item scores and total scores on the PAIN and the NIPS. RESULTS: The scores for individual items on the PAIN were significantly associated with scores obtained on the NIPS. Overall correlation between the scales was 0.93. These associations suggest that the PAIN is a valid scale for assessment of neonatal pain.

Cohort Studies↗

Post-transfusional hepatitis in neonates hospitalized in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the significance of increased serum transaminase levels in neonates admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and its relationship with blood transfusion. METHODS: Follow-up prospective study of 209 patients; 177 completed follow-up, of whom 129 were transfused and 48 were not; 57 were born after full gestation and 120 were born prematurely. The activity of serum levels of ALT, AST, and GGT was measured monthly up to six months of age, and until six months after the last transfusion. At the end of follow-up, and whenever an increase in serum transaminase levels was detected, the viral agents of hepatitis A, B, C, G, TT, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, and herpes 1 and 2, and toxoplasma were studied. Viral serology was also carried out in mothers and in donors when children tested positive. RESULTS: One hundred twenty nine neonates (73%) received 461 U red blood cell transfusions (3.6 +/- 3 U/patient). ALT levels increased in 54 (30.5%) patients, of whom 46 (36%) were transfused and eight (17%) were not (p < 0.05). The independent variables were 'infection by G virus' and 'parenteral nutrition for more than 12 days'; the variable 'transfusion' was close to the limit for statistical significance. Twenty patients (11.3%) had increased serum ALT levels 2.5 times above the normal value: 18 (14%) were transfused and two (4%) were not (p = 0.106). Only the G and TT viruses were related with transfusion; patients remained asymptomatic, although most neonates were chronically infected. CONCLUSION: Follow-up showed that increased serum ALT levels are common among severely ill neonates. Blood transfusions are safe concerning most hepatotropic viruses, but transmission of viruses G and TT is possible.

Female↗

Systemic bacterial and fungal infections in infants in Australian neonatal units. Australian Study Group for Neonatal Infections.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the pattern and incidence of sepsis occurring in neonatal units in Australia. DESIGN: A one-year prospective study of babies with systemic sepsis within 48 hours of birth (early-onset sepsis) or after this time (late-onset sepsis) in seven Australian neonatal units. Systemic sepsis was defined as clinical sepsis, plus either positive bacterial or fungal culture of blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid, or group B streptococcal antigen detected in the urine. RESULTS: There were 241 episodes of sepsis, affecting 234 babies. One quarter (61) were early-onset, a rate of 2.2 per 1000 live births. Group B streptococcus (GBS) was the commonest cause of early-onset sepsis, with a rate of 1.3 per 1000 live births. The incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis was lower at a hospital which screened for maternal carriage and used intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for all carriers. The rate of late-onset sepsis was 4.4 per 1000 live births and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the commonest cause. Meningitis occurred in 23% of babies with early-onset and in 10% with late-onset sepsis. The mortality from early-onset sepsis was 15%, and from late-onset sepsis was 9%. There were no major regional variations, other than for GBS. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of and mortality from neonatal sepsis is comparable to other countries, and shows no major regional variation. The use of intrapartum antibiotics may reduce the incidence of neonatal GBS sepsis. There are no previous comparable data on neonatal infections in Australia.

Australia↗

Neonatal bacteremia in a neonatal intensive care unit: analysis of causative organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: Infections cause significant mortality and morbidity in neonates, especially the premature ones. Although there are various antibiotics can be used to combat neonatal infection, resistant strains have subsequently emerged. In an epidemiological survey, we analyzed bacterial isolates and their antibiotic susceptibilities for cases of bacteremia in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a teaching hospital. METHODS: From November 1999 to October 2001, 623 neonates admitted to the NICU were enrolled. The incidence and incidence density of bacteremia, morbidity and mortality of sepsis, as well as antibiotic susceptibility, were investigated. RESULTS: Totally, 754 blood cultures were done on 623 patients. Fifty-eight patients experienced 85 episodes of bacteremia, with 87 isolates cultured. The incidence of bacteremia in our NICU was 9.31% (58/623) with an incidence density of 10.98/1000 patient-days. The overall mortality rate was 7.22%. The case fatality rate of bacteremia was 20.7% (12/58). The bacterial pathogens encountered, in order of frequency, were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (29%), Staphylococcus aureus (22%), and Enterobacter cloacae (17%). All of the gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin, while the gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to imipenem, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. Oxacillin-resistant S. epidermidis, oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, and multi-drug resistant enterobacteriae were the leading microorganisms causing bacteremia in our NICU. CONCLUSIONS: It is an endless struggle to combat neonatal infection. Periodic evaluation of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility is necessary. More judicious selection of antibiotics and rotating antibiotic regimens should be kept in mind to reduce the resurgence of multidrug resistant strains.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Profile of neonates admitted in pediatric ICU and validation of Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP).

A retrospective study was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of a tertiary care hospital in northern India to profile neonatal admissions and to assess the validity of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) in predicting the outcome in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). Neonatal sepsis (51%) and birth asphyxia (11.2%) were the commonest indications for admission. Thirty-seven (38.1%) of the neonates died. The mean SNAP score in babies who died was 18.8 +/- 9.8 and 10.1 +/- 6.4 in survivors (P<0.001). There was no correlation between SNAP score and mean length of stay in hospital (P=0.5). We conclude that SNAP correlates well with mortality in neonates admitted to the PICU.

Hospital Mortality↗

Comparison of neonatal mortality rates between transports to tertiary and intermediate neonatal intensive care units.

The differential of neonatal mortality rates between infant transports to tertiary and to intermediate neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) was examined based on 8,391 one-time infant transports from community hospitals to tertiary or intermediate NICUs in Southern California in the three-year period 1981-1983. Among the demographic, birth and delivery, and diagnostic characteristics studied, nine were identified to be related significantly to the higher neonatal mortality rate among transports to tertiary NICUs: birthweight, gestational age, necessity of intubation, multiple clinical conditions, presence of cardiac, neurologic, and genitourinary problems, anomalies, and syndromes. Adjusting for differences in the number of cases with necessity of intubation and the presence of the five clinical problems reduced the neonatal mortality ratio of tertiary to intermediate NICUs from 1:56 to 1:01, while adjustment for birthweight and gestational age differences reduced the ratio from 1.56 to 1.54. This analysis indicates that the difference of neonatal mortality between the two levels of NICUs can be explained to a larger extent by the higher proportion of infants requiring intubation with serious clinical problems. Birthweight and gestational age played only a minor role in this respect.

Apgar Score↗

Score for neonatal acute physiology: validation in three Kaiser Permanente neonatal intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the severity of illness is a research area of growing importance in neonatal intensive care. Most severity of illness scales have been developed in tertiary care settings. Their applicability in community neonatal intensive care units has not been tested. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the operational characteristics of the score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP): the relationship to birth weight, the length of total hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We assigned SNAP scores prospectively to all inborn admissions at three community neonatal intensive care units during an 11-month period. Data on other neonatal predictors (eg, birth weight and the presence of congenital heart disease) were also collected. We measured in-hospital mortality, the experience of interhospital transport to a higher level of care, and total hospital stay. RESULTS: We found that the SNAP's relationship to birth weight was similar to previous reports. The SNAP's perinatal extension is a reliable predictor of newborn in-hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.95. The SNAP is also a good predictor of total hospital length of stay, whether by itself (by which it can explain 31% of the total stay) or in combination with other variables. Its predictive ability is better among infants of low birth weight (<2500 g) than among those of normal birth weight (> or = 2500 g). The SNAP's predictive power was most limited among infants admitted to rule out sepsis. The predictive ability of a model containing birth weight, the SNAP, and transport status was not improved by the inclusion of two major diagnostic categories, the presence of congenital heart disease or complex illness. CONCLUSION: Although it has definite limitations among infants who weight 2500 g or more, the SNAP is a potent tool for outcomes research. Modification of some of its parameters could result in a multifunctional scale suitable for use with all birth weights.

Birth Weight↗

Neonatal septicemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. Results of four years.

The outcome of congenital and nosocomial septicemia has been documented in infants who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit over a four-year period. The overall incidence of neonatal septicemia in the neonatal intensive care unit was 5.4 percent. Common causes of neonatal septicemia were gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci. Gram-positive microorganisms were the major causative agents for early-onset septicemia. Since the most common pathogen in cases of nosocomial sepsis was gram-negative bacillus, higher mortality rates were observed in nosocomial sepsis. The overall mortality rate in neonatal sepsis was 44.2 percent. The mortality rate in infants in whom nosocomial septicemia developed was significantly higher than in the infants in whom early-onset septicemia developed. However, as gram-negative colonization of the nursery recently changed to gram-positive microorganisms, the mortality rate is hoped to decrease.

Birth Weight↗