Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Neck Dissection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

The preservation of shoulder function after radical neck dissection.

The most disabling side effect of radical neck dissection is the 'shoulder syndrome', caused by denervation of the trapezius muscle. This is due to division of the spinal accessory nerve, the motor nerve to the trapezius. Using cadaver dissections the anatomy of the cervical spinal nerve supply to the trapezius has been studied. At radical neck dissection stimulation of these cervical spinal nerves produced contraction of the trapezius muscle. Thus a modified technique of radical dissection has been developed preserving the cervical spinal nerves to the trapezius. Comparison of patients undergoing this modified radical neck dissection with patients undergoing a classical radical neck dissection shows them to have better shoulder function.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1985

Modified radical neck dissection and postoperative radiotherapy in squamous cell head and neck cancer.

Between 1978 and 1982, 41 patients with clinically staged N1, N2, or N3b disease underwent unilateral or bilateral modified radical neck dissection. Five patients died free from their original disease with less than 24 months follow-up. Twenty-four patients with histologically positive nodes received postoperative radiotherapy with 2 (8 percent) neck recurrences. Another four patients with histologically positive nodes refused postoperative radiotherapy and had two (50 percent) neck recurrences. Three patients did not respond to radiotherapy at the time of their surgery and had no neck recurrences. The final five patients had histologically negative nodes, did not receive radiotherapy, and had no neck recurrences. These results suggest that modified radical neck dissection can be used in lieu of the classical radical dissection in many patients with clinically positive nodes who have squamous cell head and neck cancer without compromising survival.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1987

Current status of neck dissection in the management of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.

Classical radical neck dissection (RND) remains the primary treatment for clinically positive lymph nodes among patients with squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Recurrence rates following RND range from 20 to 70% depending on the number of nodes involved and the extent of extracapsular spread. Modified radical neck dissection (MRND) is associated with less cosmetic and functional morbidity than RND but, used alone, MRND is only appropriate when clinical neck disease is absent or minimal. Both RND and MRND should be combined with adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy when more than one node is positive or extracapsular spread is present. This approach will significantly decrease regional failure, but may not improve survival because of an increased incidence of distant metastases. MRND is especially useful as an elective procedure to stage the clinically negative neck. A survival benefit from elective neck dissection, however, remains to be demonstrated.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Systematic approach to the treatment of chylous leakage after neck dissection.

BACKGROUND: Chylous leakage is an uncommon complication after neck dissection for which several treatment modalities have been described in literature. It occurs in 1% to 2.5% of radical neck dissections, with the majority (75% to 92%) being on the left side. In a consecutive series of patients, we investigated the effect of a systematic approach to the complication. METHODS: Over a period of 5 years, the drain production of 221 patients who underwent a neck dissection was analyzed. One hundred thirty-two right-sided and 139 left-sided neck dissections were performed. In 11 patients a chyle fistula occurred, 1 right-sided and 10 lift-sided. In all cases closed vacuum suction drainage was continued and dietary modifications (medium-chain triglycerides [MCT]/Peptison nasogastric tube feeding [PNTF]) were made. RESULTS: In 5 patients dietary modifications were sufficient to stop the leak. In the other 6 patients total parenteral nutrition via the subclavian vein (TPN) was started. In 2 cases with a severe intractable hypoalbuminemia, surgical intervention was necessary. The leak was closed by a pectoralis major muscle flap transfer, after local application of fibrin sealant (Tissucol). CONCLUSIONS: Chylous leakage is a controllable complication after neck dissection for which is most cases a stepwise conservative approach consisting of dietary modifications, maintaining closed vacuum suction drainage, seems to be sufficient. Hematologic and serum values should be monitored very carefully and corrected appropriately. To initiate planned postoperative radiotherapy in a timely fashion, the conservative treatment should be limited to about 30 days.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Modification of the Conley incision for neck dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a modified incision for neck dissection that makes the operation easier and provides good healing of the skin flaps and a cosmetic result in irradiated oral cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three oral cancer patients, treated previously with radiotherapy, developed metastatic disease in the neck requiring radical neck dissection. In 12 of these patients radical neck dissection was performed using conventional incisions such as: the Y incision (5 patients), classic Conley incision (6 patients), and McFee incision (1 patient). In the remaining 11 patients a modified Conley incision was used. This modified incision was compared with the conventional incisions using as criteria adequacy of surgical access, healing of the skin flaps, and the cosmetic result. RESULTS: In three of five patients (60%) treated with the Y incision there were complications involving early postoperative marginal necrosis of the skin flaps. The other 20 patients had normal healing and no necrosis or other complications were noted. CONCLUSION: According to our experience, we believe that the modified Conley incision in irradiated neck areas in oral cancer patients can be very useful because it is easy to perform and fulfills all the requirements for a radical neck dissection incision: adequate surgical access, good healing of skin flaps, and an acceptable cosmetic result.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2000

The role of supraomohyoid neck dissection in patients with positive nodes.

BACKGROUND: Supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND) is currently used as a staging procedure for patients with clinically negative nodes in the neck who are at increased risk (>20%) for metastatic disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential role of SOHND in patients with clinically positive nodes at levels I, II, or III. We evaluated, in particular, whether selective neck dissection in patients with clinically positive nodes results in decreased regional control and/or diminished survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent SOHND from January 1, 1971, to December 31, 1997. The oral cavity and oropharynx represented the primary sites in the majority of the patients. Two-year follow-up information was available on all patients. RESULTS: During the study period, 69 patients underwent 84 SOHNDs. Of the 69 patients, there were 30 patients with clinically negative nodes and 39 patients with clinically positive nodes in the neck. The overall regional control rates were 88% vs 71% for pathologically negative vs positive nodes, respectively, with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved regional control in patients with pathologically positive nodes but not in patients with NO disease (P = .005). Similar results were noted in patients with both clinically and pathologically positive nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Supraomohyoid neck dissection in patients with pathologically positive nodes in the neck is inadequate therapy for regional control without postoperative radiation therapy. However, in patients with pathologically positive nodes in the neck, SOHND with postoperative radiation therapy can achieve regional control comparable to that of comprehensive neck dissection and postoperative radiation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Value of elective neck dissection in patients with clinically stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of elective neck dissection in patients with clinically stage I (cT1N0M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with surgical treatment between November 1984 and November 1999. A total of 130 patients were included in the study, all of whom received operation of the primary site, meanwhile, 99 of whom underwent elective neck dissection simultaneously including level I -III or level I -IV neck dissection in 20 patients and level I - V neck dissection in 79 patients. Results Among all these patients, the rate of occult metastasis to the neck were 12. 0%. Local failure rate in patients with only local treatment, level I II, II, III/IV neck dissection and level I - V neck dissection were 25. 8%, 15. 0% and 7. 6% respectively. There were significant difference in regional failure between patients with only local treatment and patients with elective neck dissection (P < 0.05). Also, no significant differences were noted in the survival rate between patients with only local treatment, elective neck dissection (level I -III or level I -IV) and level I -V neck dissection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elective neck dissection significantly reduced regional control failure but was not able to reduce distant metastasis or increase the overall survival. A prospective randomized study is worthwhile to further evaluate the benefit of elective neck dissection in the treatment of clinically stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Planned postradiotherapy neck dissection: Rationale and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we examine pathology results and clinical outcome for patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who present with advanced neck disease and undergo planned postradiotherapy neck dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Review of all patients with SCCHN treated with primary radiation (or chemoradiation) and postradiotherapy neck dissection at the University of Wisconsin between 1992 to 2005 was performed. One hundred seven neck dissections were identified in 93 patients, 79 unilateral and 14 bilateral. All major treatment and outcome parameters were examined with particular emphasis on the postradiotherapy neck dissection. RESULTS: Thirty of 107 neck dissection specimens (28%) showed evidence of residual carcinoma on pathologic review. The mean number of lymph nodes identified at neck dissection for the entire cohort was 21 per specimen (range, 1-60) with 1.3 nodes per positive neck dissection demonstrating residual carcinoma. No correlation was found between the type of neck dissection performed and the presence of residual nodal disease. Eighty-two evaluated patients (93%) remain free of regional disease recurrence, whereas six patients have subsequently manifested neck recurrence. Four of the six patients who developed regional recurrence showed residual carcinoma in their neck dissection specimen. Five of these patients underwent comprehensive neck dissection (levels I-V); one underwent selective neck dissection (<levels I-V). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-fourth of the patients in this series showed pathologic evidence of residual carcinoma in the neck at the time of postradiotherapy neck dissection. The majority of these cases showed microscopic residual carcinoma in a single lymph node. Although in the early postradiotherapy setting, we cannot accurately predict the viability and growth potential of microscopic residual carcinoma in lymph nodes, these findings, combined with the modest overall morbidity of selective neck dissection, suggest that planned postradiotherapy neck dissection should be strongly considered for patients presenting with advanced neck disease. This remains a prevailing clinical practice at our institution.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Objective comparison of shoulder dysfunction after three neck dissection techniques.

A prospective study with subjective evaluation of shoulder pain and objective evaluation of shoulder muscle strength by isokinetic testing and electromyographic and electroneurographic studies of spinal accessory nerve function was performed on patients who had undergone neck dissection procedures. Twenty-one patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in this study. Three types of neck dissection were performed: 7 selective neck dissections, 9 modified radical neck dissections, and 5 radical neck dissections. All patients who underwent radical neck dissection had shoulder pain, and 80% of them had shoulder droop after the operation. In the patients who underwent selective neck dissection, the electromyographic findings of the spinal accessory nerve were relatively normal. Their shoulder strength was sometimes decreased at I month after operation, but it had returned to preoperative strength by the 6-month follow-up visit. These findings suggested that patients who underwent selective neck dissection had the least damage to spinal accessory nerve function and the least shoulder disability after neck dissection.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Blindness after laryngectomy and bilateral neck dissection in a diabetic patient: case report.

CONTEXT: Neck dissection that accompanies resection of the primary lesion in malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tracts may cause complications inherent to the procedure or to prolongation of surgical time, increasing the risks for the patient. Among the complications that might occur is blindness, a rare complication with only 10 cases reported in the literature thus far. OBJECTIVE: To present the case of a diabetic patient submitted to total laryngectomy and modified and selective neck dissection that resulted in blindness. CASE REPORT: The authors report on a patient submitted to total laryngectomy and selective neck dissection on the left side, and modified radical neck dissection on the right, who developed blindness. This was probably due to intraoperative hypotension plus the contribution of decompensated diabetes mellitus and thrombosis of the internal jugular vein on the right side. The possible causes, risk factors and care to be taken to prevent this rare but highly debilitating complication are discussed.

Blindness↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy of prophylactic elective neck dissection in the treatment of cancer of the larynx.

The effectiveness of elective neck dissection for treatment of cancers of the head and neck is controversial. We report a restrospective study of 142 patients treated at our hospital between 1974 and 1994 for squamous cell carcinomas of the supraglottic larynx. At the time of surgery, none of the patients had palpable cervical adenopathy. All patients underwent tumour resection, while 55 additionally underwent functional elective neck dissection. Elective neck dissection had no significant effects on either the risk of subsequent development of ipsilateral cervical adenopathy or on survival. In view of these results, we do not consider elective neck dissection to be beneficial as a routine strategy for management of carcinomas affecting the supraglottic larynx.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Improvements on radical neck dissection].

OBJECTIVE: To improve the surgery of radical neck dissection for a better curative effect. METHOD: Some improvements on incision, path to exploration and manipulation of operation were made in 65 patients with head and neck tumors while radical neck dissection were done. RESULT: The average surgical time was 110 minutes and the average amount of bleeding was 120 ml in the patients when radical neck dissection had been completed. The complications decreased to 1.54%. The surviual rates of 2 and 3 years are 86.2% (56/65) and 81.6 (31/38) respectively. CONCLUSION: With these improvements on radical neck dissection, the curative effect in the near future is improved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Efficacy of selective neck dissection: a review of 123 cases of elective and therapeutic treatment of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of selective neck dissection (SND) in elective and therapeutic treatment of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 123 patients undergoing 157 SNDs as a part of initial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck from January 1997 to September 2001 at this institute. The primary site included larynx(n = 77), oral cavity(n = 29), oropharynx(n = 2), and hypopharynx(n = 15). Lymph nodes were pathologically negative (pN0) in 99 and positive (pN+) in 24 patients. Peri-operative radiotherapy was given to 30.3% of pN0 and 50.0% of pN+ patients. The median follow-up interval was 25 months. RESULTS: 101 patients received elective neck dissection, 14 of them (13.9%) found to be pN+, while 22 patients received therapeutic neck dissection, 10 of them (45.5%) found to be pN+. A total of 52 positive nodes were found in 157 SNDs. The distribution of the positive nodes were as follows: Level I 25%; Level II 48%; Level III 25%; Level IV 2%. The 5-year regional recurrence rates estimated according to Kaplan-Meier were 5.87% (95% CI: 0.8%, 10.9%) for the pN0 and 9.2% (95% CI: 0.0%, 21.5%) for pN+ patients. CONCLUSION: The SND, when carefully indicated, a contribution to the concept of less invasive surgery, offers functional and esthetic advantages without oncologic compromise.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Therapeutic selective neck dissection: a 25-year review.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to show the efficacy of selective neck dissection in combination with postoperative radiation therapy in controlling squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the cervical lymph nodes. The study compared the incidence of recurrences and overall disease-free survival between comparable cohorts undergoing a selective neck dissection and classic radical or modified neck dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, 25-year review was made of data from a tertiary care academic facility comprising both private patients and veterans. METHODS: Inclusion criteria studied patients with untreated head and neck cancer who had squamous carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes on histological examination and were treated with a selective (n = 61), modified (n = 54), or radical neck dissection (n = 61). The three groups were compared with respect to regional control and overall cancer-free survival. All patients remained cancer free at the primary site, received postoperative radiation therapy, and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The median follow-up was 4.3 years. RESULTS: Control of recurrent carcinoma in the neck, as well as the incidence of overall cancer-free survival, was comparable in the three cohorts with no significant statistical difference. Eight of 176 sides of the necks (4.5%) showed evidence of recurrence (2 of 61 [3.3%] in the selective neck dissection group and 6 of 115 [5.2%] in the radical and modified neck dissection group. Disease-free 2-year survival was 80% in the selective neck dissection group and 64% in the radical and modified neck dissection group. CONCLUSION: Selective neck dissection, when used in combination with postoperative radiation therapy, is an efficacious way to manage metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the neck.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1999

Impact of neck dissection on quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: For decades, the gold standard for treatment of cervical metastasis was radical neck dissection (RND). Current oncologic philosophy allows for treatment of appropriately staged neck disease with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) or selective neck dissection (SND). The purposes of this study were to determine the impact of various forms of neck dissection on patients' quality of life (QOL) and to evaluate the responsiveness of the University of Washington (UW) QOL shoulder domain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective accumulation of QOL data from patients treated for head and neck cancer at UW. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were identified from the UW QOL registry who had undergone neck dissection and had completed pretreatment and posttreatment QOL questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Compared with pretreatment scores, the MRND and RND groups reported worse shoulder function at 6 and 12 months (P<.0005). The MRND group reported greater shoulder disability at 6 months compared with the SND group (P = .002), but by 12 months, there was no difference between the two groups. Shoulder function for the RND group was worse than the SND group at 6 and 12 months (P = .004). There was a trend toward decreased pain after treatment in the SND and MRND groups. There were no significant differences in subjective appearance, activity, recreation, chewing, swallowing, or speech in the three groups after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with findings of published functional studies, this study confirmed that the three forms of neck dissection affect patients' QOL differently. This study demonstrates that the UW QOL shoulder domain is a responsive instrument in assessing the effect of neck dissection on shoulder function.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Cable grafting of the spinal accessory nerve for rehabilitation of shoulder function after radical neck dissection.

From January 1981 through December 1985, 9 patients underwent radical neck dissection with sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve for removal of metastatic cancer to cervical nodes followed by reconstruction of the spinal accessory nerve utilizing a cable graft from the greater auricular nerve. Shoulder function on the operated side was assessed postoperatively using a subjective questionnaire, objective strength testing, and EMG recordings. The group that had cable grafts of the spinal accessory nerve were compared to a group who had modified radical neck dissection with preservation of the spinal accessory nerve, and to a third group that had classical radical neck dissection with sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve and no cable graft reconstruction. The group with cable grafts scored in a position intermediate between the modified neck dissection group and the classical radical neck dissection group on subjective and objective testing. Most of the patients with cable grafts demonstrated voluntary motor potentials in the trapezius muscle on postoperative EMG testing. Cable grafting of the spinal accessory nerve sacrificed during radical neck dissection results in improved shoulder function in the postoperative period. Indications and contraindications for the use of this rehabilitative procedure are presented.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2001

Surgical treatment of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: evaluation of the evidence for modifications of neck dissection.

BACKGROUND: This review article examines the role of the different types of neck dissection in the treatment of squamous carcinoma metastases to the cervical nodes. METHODS: A critical evaluation of the literature on the pathologic basis, oncologic effectiveness, and functional outcome of neck dissection. RESULTS: Pathologic data show preferential metastasis to different lymph node levels, in N0- and N+-staged disease, depending on the primary tumor site. Comparative studies on control of regional metastases suggest that modified radical is no less effective than radical neck dissection, but there is insufficient data to draw firm conclusions on the role of selective neck dissection. Selective and modified radical dissections result in less shoulder disability than radical neck dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Modified radical neck dissection is supported by pathologic and clinical evidence in N1- and 2-staged disease. There may be a role for selective dissection, but there is a need for more information on oncologic outcome. Prospective multicenter systematic data collection on the outcome of neck dissection is a pragmatic alternative to a trial.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2005

Selective vs modified radical neck dissection and postoperative radiotherapy vs observation in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of selective neck dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue with advanced nodal disease, and to assess the role of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with SCC of the oral tongue with pathologically N1 necks. DESIGN: Retrospective study of the medical records of all patients who underwent neck dissection for SCC of the oral tongue from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. SETTING: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, a tertiary care cancer hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 220 patients with SCC of the oral tongue who received surgical treatment of both the primary tumor and the neck and who had an identifiable type of neck dissection, no synchronous or metachronous lesions, and no evidence of local recurrence. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent resection of the primary tumor and neck dissection. The extent of neck dissection was determined by surgeon preference. Some patients received radiotherapy to the neck as well. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and pathological nodal status, type of neck dissection, and use of radiotherapy. The end points evaluated included the regional control rates. RESULTS: For clinically N+ patients, 5 of 45 treated with selective neck dissection and 1 of 19 treated with radical or modified radical neck dissection had recurrences in the ipsilateral neck. If only patients with significant tumor burden on final pathological examination (clinically N+/pathologically N2) are considered, 4 (25.0%) of 16 patients undergoing selective neck dissection had recurrences in the neck, while none of the 14 patients treated with radical or modified radical neck dissection had recurrences in the ipsilateral neck (P = .07). Of the 50 patients who had pathologically N1 disease, 25 received postoperative radiotherapy and 25 did not. Of the latter, 2 had recurrences in the neck, while none of the 25 patients who received radiotherapy had recurrences in the neck (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Selective neck dissection may be sufficient for many N+ patients with SCC of the oral tongue, but some patients with extensive nodal disease may benefit from more aggressive treatment of the neck. Radiotherapy may be beneficial for all of the node-positive patients, but further studies are needed. Prospective, randomized clinical trials will be useful in further defining the role of selective neck dissection in the clinically N2 neck and radiotherapy in the N1 neck for patients with SCC of the oral tongue.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗