Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MASTECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Radical mastectomy in the aged female.

Of 142 female patients over age 75 at The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, 58 underwent radical mastectomy and 40 simple mastectomy for primary breast cancer. After five years, 19 per cent of the radical mastectomy group were cancer-free compared with 35 per cent of the simple mastectomy group. The gross five-year survival rates were 50 per cent and 47 per cent respectively. In the radical mastectomy group, when the axillary nodes did not show cancer at the time of operation, there have been no known recurrences and 70 per cent of the patients have survived at least five years. There was no surgical mortality. These findings support the view that until more controlled data are available, radical mastectomy is still the preferred therapy for primary breast cancer.

Age Factors↗

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group.

PURPOSE: Data on the efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer risk reduction in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations are limited, despite the clinical use of this risk-management strategy. Thus, we estimated the degree of breast cancer risk reduction after surgery in women who carry these mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-three women with disease-associated germline BRCA1/2 mutations were studied for the occurrence of breast cancer. Cases were mutation carriers who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and who were followed prospectively from the time of their center ascertainment and their surgery, with analyses performed for both follow-up periods. Controls were BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with no history of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy matched to cases on gene, center, and year of birth. Both cases and controls were excluded for previous or concurrent diagnosis of breast cancer. Analyses were adjusted for duration of endogenous ovarian hormone exposure, including age at bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy if applicable. RESULTS: Breast cancer was diagnosed in two (1.9%) of 105 women who had bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and in 184 (48.7%) of 378 matched controls who did not have the procedure, with a mean follow-up of 6.4 years. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduced the risk of breast cancer by approximately 95% in women with prior or concurrent bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and by approximately 90% in women with intact ovaries. CONCLUSION: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1/2 mutations by approximately 90%.

Adult↗

Serum prolactin after chest wall surgery: elevated levels after mastectomy.

Galactorrhea is a recognized sequel of chest injury, but serum PRL levels in these patients have not been systematically documented. Therefore, we examined the PRL responses over 5 days in patients undergoing either mastectomy (10 patients) or thoracotomy (10) and in seven patients undergoing elective laparotomy (controls). Basal serum PRL levels were normal in every subject. There were no consistent or significant alterations in PRL levels after laparotomy or thoracotomy. After mastectomy, PRL levels rose from a mean preoperative level of 7.1 +/- 1.3 to 16.0 +/- 3.3 ng/ml (P < 0.01) on the first postoperative day. Mean levels continued to rise to 35.6 +/- 6.6 ng/ml (P < 0.005) on day 5; levels were supranormal in eight subjects. Hyperprolactinemia persisted in the four subjects evaluated 4 weeks postoperatively and in one of five patients evaluated at 6 months. In a retrospective study, serum PRL levels were measured months to years after thoracotomy (31 patients) and mastectomy (53 patients) and compared to levels in 41 normal female controls. Mean serum PRL levels were 8.4 +/- 1.3 ng/ml in the control group, 13.1 +/- 0.9 ng/ml in the thoracotomy group (P < 0.005), and 20.6 +/- 3.1 ng/ml in the mastectomy group (P < 0.001). One thoracotomy patient and 18 mastectomy patients (34%) had supranormal PRL levels. It is concluded that mastectomy acutely stimulates PRL secretion in most subjects, and levels may remain elevated for months, perhaps for years, in a proportion of patients. Both the acute and chronic hyperprolactinemic states are probably the result of neurogenic PRL release mediated via the suckling reflex.

Adult↗

The impact of mastectomy on self-concept and social function: a combined cross-sectional and longitudinal study with comparison groups.

Self-concept and social function following radical, modified radical or simple mastectomy for Stage I or II breast cancer, breast biopsy for benign breast disease, cholecystectomy or no operative procedure were measured across a fifteen-month period in a cross-sectional design and across a twelve-month period in a repeated measures design. Women selected for study were without other preexisting mental or physical illness. The degree of disability observed following mastectomy was considerably less than previously reported in uncontrolled studies, with the incidence of actual disturbance extremely small. Women receiving adjuvant therapies following mastectomy, but not women treated by mastectomy alone, reported significantly more body-image dissatisfaction and feminine self-image concerns than the comparison groups. The findings refute previously published impressions of severe psychosocial maladjustments following mastectomy. The study suggests that post-mastectomy women vulnerable to poorer outcome would be those with lower expectations of good quality social support, other present life stressors, other pre-existing chronic diseases, and a disposition to believe in life outcomes as less under their own control.

Adult↗

The practice of prophylactic mastectomy: a survey of Maryland surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is a drastic breast cancer preventive option for which indications are not standardized and efficacy has not been proven. To estimate the magnitude of this controversial practice, surgeons were surveyed on their recommendations about and performance of prophylactic mastectomy. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to general surgeons (n = 522), plastic surgeons (n = 80), and gynecologists (n = 801) licensed to practice in Maryland in 1992. Proportions responding were 41.9%, 66.3%, and 54.9%, respectively. In addition, there were 30 respondents who identified "other" as their specialty. The respondents were asked about the role of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and the number of times they had recommended and performed it in a year. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-two surgeons responded (51.8%). More plastic surgeons (84.6%) than general surgeons (47.0%) and gynecologists (38.3%) agreed that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy has a role in the care of high-risk women. Eighty-one percent of plastic surgeons had recommended the procedure, compared with 38.8% of general surgeons and 17.7% of gynecologists. CONCLUSIONS: Indications and practice patterns reveal heterogeneity of medical opinion and practice of prophylactic mastectomy. This study raises the need for better evaluation of the efficacy and appropriateness of prophylactic mastectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

The influence of early age mastectomy and unilateral ovariectomy on reproductive performance of the bovine.

The effects of mastectomy and unilateral ovariectomy and their interaction during the postpartum period were examined in 26 Angus heifers. At birth, the animals were assigned to a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: mastectomy and unilateral ovariectomy, mastectomy, unilateral ovariectomy and unoperated suckled control. Surgeries were performed at approximately 2 months of age, and animals were observed through three consecutive postpartum intervals (PP1, PP2, and PP3). There were no significant influences of mastectomy or ovariectomy on age at puberty, age at first conception or services required for first conception. Mastectomy reduced the number of days from parturition to ovulation (PP1, 32.1 vs 52.5, P less than .01; PP2, 21.6 vs 59.9, P less than .01; PP3, 20.6 vs 46.7, P less than .01) The interval from parturition to first estrus was shorter for heifers in the mastectomized group (PP1, 45.3 vs 76.2, P less than .05; PP2, 28.7 vs 69.9, P less than .01; PP3, 32.4 vs 62.3, P less than .05) as was the interval from parturition to conception during PP2 (60.0 vs 104.9, P less than .05). The interval between calvings was shorter for heifers in the mastectomized group than for controls, but the difference was significant only between the second and third parturitions: 338.5 vs 399.2 (P less than .01). Mastectomy reduced the standard deviation for the interval between parturition 2 and parturition 3 (55.9 vs 15.9; P less than .01), the interval between parturition and return to estrus in PP2 (56.3 vs 11.4; P less than .01) and the interval from calving to conception PP1 (92.2 vs 31.4; P less than .01). Unilateral ovariectomy did not have a significant influence on any of the postpartum intervals, nor were there any significant interactions.

Age Factors↗

Radiation therapy following mastectomy for axillary node-positive breast cancer: indication of chest wall irradiation.

This retrospective study was conducted to determine the indication of chest wall irradiation following mastectomy in axillary node-positive breast cancer patients. Between 1982 and 1993, 103 women with axillary node-positive breast cancer received postoperative radiation therapy following mastectomy using the hockey-stick field, which included the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary nodes, without the chest wall. Ages ranged from 33 to 73 years (median: 47). Thirty-five patients underwent modified radical mastectomy, 48 radical mastectomy, and 20 extended radical mastectomy. Twenty-two patients had 1-3 positive axillary nodes, and 81 had 4 or more positive axillary nodes. The total doses ranged from 42 to 64 Gy (median 54 Gy) with a daily fraction size of 2 Gy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 75 patients, and hormone therapy was administered to 78 patients. The median follow-up time was 121 months (range, 68-191 months) for the 57 surviving patients. The actuarial overall survival rate and the chest wall control rate at 10 years for all patients were 55% and 85%, respectively. Of the 103 patients, 14 developed chest wall recurrence. In the analysis, status of vascular invasion alone had a significant impact on chest wall control. In patients with definite vascular invasion, 2 of 5 (40%) patients with 1 to 3 positive axillary nodes, and 10 of 31 (32%) with 4 or more positive axillary nodes developed chest wall recurrence. In contrast, no patients without definite vascular invasion developed chest wall recurrence. Factors such as age, menopausal status, pathology, tumor location, extent of resection, estrogen receptor status, total dose, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy did not influence the development of chest wall recurrence. Among node-positive breast cancer patients following mastectomy, those with definite vascular invasion should be delivered chest wall irradiation regardless of the number of positive axillary nodes. In contrast, those without definite vascular invasion need not be administered chest wall irradiation.

Adult↗

Effect of fibrin glue on lymphatic drainage after modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Fibrin as a tissue sealant has been used since the turn of the century for hemostasis. The development of cryoprecipitate and the resultant availability of higher concentrations of fibrinogen have led to a resurgence of interest in this material. Fibrin glue has since been shown to be effective for numerous applications throughout the field of surgery. Animal studies have shown fibrin glue to be effective at reducing drain output after mastectomy. Human studies, however, have been equivocal. Our objectives were to determine whether the use of fibrin glue would decrease lymphatic drainage after modified radical mastectomy and subsequently reduce time to drain removal. A prospective randomized trial was conducted consisting of 27 women. All women received modified radical mastectomy. At the completion of the mastectomy they were randomized to receive either standard closure or the application of fibrin glue before standard closure. Patients were then monitored for daily drain output, time to drain removal, and wound complications. A total of 14 women received fibrin glue and 13 received no glue. Those patients receiving fibrin glue had a significantly higher average drain output than patients who did not receive glue (1308 vs 754 cm3; P = 0.012). Time to drain removal was also increased by 4 days, although this did not reach statistical significance. The overall complication rate was higher for the fibrin glue group, although again, this did not reach significance. The application of fibrin glue significantly increased drain total drain output after modified radical mastectomy. Time to drain removal was increased as was the complication rate. On the basis of these data fibrin glue cannot be recommended for routine use in modified radical mastectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Immediate breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap after skin-sparing mastectomy.

Immediate breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap after skin-sparing mastectomy is becoming an increasingly performed procedure in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, early invasive breast cancer, and prophylactic mastectomy. Through a periareolar approach, it is possible to remove the breast parenchyma along with the nipple areola complex, preserving almost all the original skin envelope and the inframmamary fold. The TRAM flap is used to recreate the volume and shape of the original breast. This technique has higher quality and easier reconstruction. The major disadvantages, extensive scar and donor site skin color mismatch, are reduced to a minimum level because the former is limited at the natural border of the nipple areola and the latter can be effectively concealed with proper nipple reconstruction. Thirty-one patients with a mean age of 39 years (range, 26-50 years) who had undergone unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for early breast cancer and immediate breast reconstruction with the pedicled TRAM flap were retrospectively reviewed. Requirements for the skin-sparing mastectomy technique include suitability of donor site tissue for autologous tissue, early breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, and adequate size and shape matching of the contralateral breast. There was no observed local recur- rence during the follow-up period (mean, 20 months; range, 11-30 months). Complications at the recipient site include mastectomy skin flap partial necrosis in 2 patients and cellulitis of the transferred flap in 1 patient. No total or partial flap necrosis was observed. One patient developed abdominal bulging 1 month after the operation, during the administration of chemotherapy. All reconstruction was considered very satisfactory from an aesthetic perspective by the surgeon and the patient. The nicer aesthetic result with oncological safety is achieved with immediate breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap after skin-sparing mastectomy. The risk of local recurrence is not higher compared with more radical surgical techniques.

Adult↗

Current status of prophylactic mastectomy.

The management of women at high risk for breast cancer presents a clinical dilemma to the health-care provider as well as to the woman herself. Current options include surveillance, prophylactic surgery (mastectomy and/or oophorectomy), and/or chemoprevention. Prophylactic mastectomy, including bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in high-risk women or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with primary breast cancer, has been a controversial clinical option. In this review, we address the efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in reducing the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women, the use of this procedure, surgical complications, and its psychosocial impact. The decision to undergo prophylactic mastectomy is highly personal and must be preceded by an in-depth assessment of the woman's risk of breast cancer, and a thorough discussion of the benefits of the procedure weighed against its potential surgical risks and psychological impact. It is also imperative that the woman be informed of alternative options for management, including chemoprevention, close surveillance, and prophylactic oophorectomy.

Breast Neoplasms↗

[Mastectomy incisions and biopsy technics in view of subsequent reconstructive surgery in breast cancer].

Patients are referred to departments for plastic surgery increasingly frequently for breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer of the breast. Successful results depend greatly on the primary mastectomy carried out by surgeons without experience in reconstruction. It is particularly important that the incisions are suitably placed so that the final result can be satisfactory. Our material consists of 119 patients who had been submitted to unilateral mastectomy for cancer of the breast at least one year previously. One fifth of the patients had hypertrophic breasts. The unequal distribution of weight following unilateral mastectomy is followed by such considerable discomfort from the remaining breast that this alone makes a reduction plastic operation necessary. Simultaneously, reconstruction is carried out on the side of the mastectomy. As the method of reconstruction, introduction of silicone prosthesis were carried out in 110 patients. Nine patients were, in addition, submitted to more complicated plastic flap procedures. The postoperative course was uncomplicated in 112 patients (94%). Reoperation proved necessary on seven occasions; in four patients on account of haematoma formation and rupture of the wound in three patients. In four patients, the prosthesis had to be renewed on account of rupture during the subsequent years. Guidelines for placing the incisions at the primary mastectomy are suggested to facilitate successful reconstruction. Finally, a suitable biopsy technique is described.

Adult↗

Analysis of the risk reduction of prophylactic partial mastectomy in Sprague-Dawley rats with 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene-induced breast cancer.

The effectiveness of prophylactic mastectomy in preventing breast cancer was studied in female albino Sprague-Dawley rats. Group A served as untreated controls. Groups B, C, and D underwent 50%, 75%, and total mastectomies 2 weeks after the administration of 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA). Group E was initially subjected to total mastectomy. Two weeks after surgery, group E received 5 mg of DMBA intravenously. Group F underwent sham procedures. All animals were sacrificed at age 8 months. The mean number of tumors per animal developing in groups A through E was 5.00, 5.17, 4.67, 5.46, and 5.20, respectively. There was 0.21 tumor per animal in group F. The mean time to tumor development in groups A through E was 11.33, 10.05, 9.88, 19.25, and 19.38 weeks, respectively. All results were subjected to an analysis of variance. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of DMBA-induced tumors in groups A through E. Groups D and E had a significant prolonged time to tumor development. The overall risk of the development of breast tumors was not significantly reduced by prophylactic mastectomy. Residual breast tissue after prophylactic mastectomy is at increased risk for the development of breast tumors. The risk of developing breast tumors in this model is not reduced in proportion to the amount of breast tissue removed. (This study suggests that subcutaneous mastectomy in high-risk individuals may not have appropriate prophylaxis against the development of carcinoma of the breast.)

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene↗

[A study of transfer of cefbuperazone into postoperative exudates in patients with cancer mastectomy or thyroidectomy].

Cefbuperazone (CBPZ) at a dose of 2 g was administered postoperatively by intravenous drip infusion to 9 patients subjected to radical mastectomy and 10 others subjected to thyroidectomy then levels of CBPZ in postoperative exudates were measured and its prophylactic effect on postoperative infections was determined. 1. Serum CBPZ levels in the patients after cancer mastectomy and thyroidectomy on postoperative day 1 were similar to those in healthy adults. 2. Levels of CBPZ in the postoperative exudates in patients subjected to cancer mastectomy reached a mean peak value of 66.3 micrograms/ml (range: 26.0-99.6 micrograms/ml) in 0-3 hours after administration, and the mean CBPZ level at 6 hours after administration was 33.3 micrograms/ml (range: 19.1-54.1 micrograms/ml). 3. As compared to the cases of cancer mastectomy, levels of CBPZ in postoperative exudates in patients subjected to thyroidectomy varied considerably from a patient to another: a mean peak level of 76.4 micrograms/ml (range: 31.3-128 micrograms/ml) appeared in 0 to 6 hours after administration. 4. There was no correlation between CBPZ levels in the exudate and hemoglobin levels or hematocrit values. 5. Likely because of the CBPZ administration at 4 g/day for 2 to 6 days postoperatively to 19 patients, postoperative infection was absent and no side effect attributable to this drug occurred in any of the patients. Because levels of CBPZ in postoperative exudates in patients subjected to cancer mastectomy or thyroidectomy were greater than MICs for principal Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, it is likely that this drug is a useful agent for prophylaxis against postoperative infections in patients undergoing cancer mastectomy or thyroidectomy.

Adult↗

The modified extended mastectomy using the trap-door method as a staging operation.

The choice of operation for breast cancer must be directed towards giving the best chance of local control of the disease. Extended radical mastectomy may be beneficial for patients with internal mammary lymph node metastases, although it has remained controversial. The anterior chest defect created by extended radical mastectomy should be avoided in patients with no metastasis in the internal mammary lymph nodes. This paper, proposes a new technique of modified extended mastectomy using the trap-door method as a staging operation and an intermediate operation between modified radical mastectomy and extended radical mastectomy. In this operation, the axillary dissection could be performed by reflecting the pectoralis major muscle and the internal mammary lymph nodes could be dissected by reflecting the parasternal chest wall in trap-door fashion. In cases in which the metastasis is histologically found in the internal mammary content, extended radical mastectomy by sternal splitting is preferred.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Oestrogen and progesterone receptor estimation by enzyme-immunoassay on tissues removed before and after a modified radical mastectomy.

To investigate the possibility of receptor degradation due to devascularization of the tumour during mastectomy, oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) were measured by an enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) in 59 cases of primary breast cancer on samples taken before and after performing a modified radical mastectomy. Pre- and post-mastectomy samples from the same patient were analysed simultaneously in the same assay run. There was 86.4% and 93.2% agreement respectively in ER and PgR status between samples removed before and after surgery. When actual values were analysed, the post-mastectomy values were higher or lower than pre-mastectomy values with similar frequency. These random variations could be attributed to heterogeneous distribution of receptors within a tumour. The overall correlation between pre- and post-mastectomy values was excellent (ER: r = 0.810, P < 0.001; PgR: r = 0.706, P < 0.001). Devascularization of the tumour during surgery does not seem to affect the integrity of the epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies against ER and PgR to any significant extent.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Breast preservation versus mastectomy--recurrence and survival rates of primary breast cancer patients treated at the UFK Bonn.

The aim of this retrospective long-term analysis was to evaluate the approach of breast conservation in the light of the results obtained, on the basis of mastectomy, in patients with early breast carcinoma. Additionally, the effect of internal mammary and supraclavicular radiotherapy was analyzed. Therefore, local-regional recurrence (LRR) and survival rates were examined in 411 patients with T1 and T2 stages who had undergone either breast-preserving surgery with radiation or mastectomy. Individual risk factors such as nodal status, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and age of the patients were evaluated, too. The rate of local-regional recurrence in patients who were treated by mastectomy and conservative surgery was 9.2% and 11.0%, respectively, with relapse happening earlier in the latter group (median of 16 vs. 24 months). Survival rates, however, were not different in the two groups. Tumour stage and nodal status had no influence on the local-regional recurrence rate in either group. In connection with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, however, the rate increased to 14.5% (mastectomy) and 19.0% (breast-preserving surgery), respectively. Patients < or = 40 years had an even higher risk of LRR, with 20.6% when they underwent mastectomy and 30.8% following breast conservation. Internal mammary and supraclavicular radiotherapy had no positive effect on the survival rates, neither in the mastectomy nor in the breast conservation group. As a conclusion, in more than 60% of all T1 stages. and more than 50% of all T2 stages, the therapeutic concept of breast preservation seems to be justified.

Adult↗

The primary surgical treatment of carcinoma of the breast: a changing trend toward modified radical mastectomy.

To study the effectiveness of a trend at the Mayo Clinic toward modifying the standard radical mastectomy, the 5-year survival of 873 women treated surgically for breast cancer from 1965 through 1968 was evaluated. The observed survival of 534 patients treated by the standard radical mastectomy was 85% when nodes were negative and 56% when nodes were positive. For 339 patients treated by the modified radical mastectomy, the observed survival was 80% and 48% when axillary nodes were negative and positive, respectively. In order to accomplish a more significant analysis of cancer risk and results of the two operative procedures, a relatively homogeneous group of 541 patients was established from the total group. In this homogeneous group, the observed survival of 336 patients treated by the standard radical mastectomy was 86% when nodes were negative and 66% when nodes were positive. For 205 patients treated by the modified radical mastectomy, the observed survival was 84% and 66% when axillary nodes were negative and positive, respectively. When patients were further analyzed and compared according to the extent of axillary-node involvement, age at the time of treatment, grade, size, location, and histopathologic type of tumor, and the use of postoperative irradiation, survival was essentially the same, irrespective of the type of mastectomy performed.

Adult↗

Comparison of breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy for treatment of early breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to compare the survival and recurrence rates of patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy with the rates of those undergoing mastectomy. Between August 1991 and June 1994, 229 patients were enrolled in this study, although one was later excluded because the tumor was histologically diagnosed as benign. A total of 119 patients with clinical stage TIS, I or II underwent breast-conserving therapy and 109 patients received mastectomy. Mastectomy was utilized more than breast-conserving therapy in the case of clinical stage II, greater age, larger tumor size or shorter distance between the tumor and the nipple. Twenty-seven patients (23.1%) of the 117 receiving breast-conserving surgery were surgical margin positive. There was no significant difference in the distance between the tumor and the nipple, tumor size or clinical stage in the incidence of surgical margin positive cases. Mean follow-up time of the breast-conserving therapy group and the mastectomy group was 42.4 and 39.7 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall survival and disease-free survival between breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy. After adjustment for the clinical stage, there was no significant difference in the prognosis between breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy.

Adult↗