Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Loperamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

The physiological and clinical effects of loperamide treatment versus placebo were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in patients operated with restorative proctocolectomy. Sixteen patients operated with endoanal mucosectomy and a handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 14 patients operated with abdominal proctocolectomy and stapling of the pouch to the top of the anal canal were studied. While loperamide treatment increased resting anal pressure in both groups of patients by approximately 20% (P < 0.05), squeeze pressure was not affected. Loperamide did not affect pouch volume or contractility. Sensory thresholds and the recto/pouch-anal inhibitory reflex were not influenced by loperamide treatment. Clinical function was improved, with a reduced bowel frequency and an improved nighttime continence, with less soiling (P < 0.05) as well as need to wear a protective pad.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Loperamide: novel effects on capacitative calcium influx.

Loperamide is a widely used antidiarrheal that primarily acts at nanomolar concentrations through activation of opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. At somewhat higher concentrations, loperamide blocks calmodulin activity, calcium channels, N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor channels, and maitotoxin-elicited calcium influx. Loperamide at micromolar concentrations has now been shown to have a remarkable stimulatory effect on the capacitative calcium influx that is triggered in many cells by depletion of the inositol-trisphosphate-sensitive stores of calcium in the endoplasmic reticulum. The mechanism whereby loperamide enhances levels of intracellular calcium elevated by capacitative calcium influx is, as yet, undefined.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2005

The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat.

UNLABELLED: Continence problems during treatment with orlistat (a lipase inhibitor) are caused when susceptible patients are exposed to increased volumes of loose, fatty stool. AIM: To investigate the dose-response effects of loperamide on continence and anorectal function in subjects susceptible to continence problems on orlistat. METHOD: Ten obese subjects enterred a randomized controlled, double-blind study of loperamide at placebo, 2, 4, and 6 mg/day in a factorial design. Continence problems during orlistat treatment were self-assessed by patient diary. Anorectal function and continence were assessed by barostat, manometry, and retention testing. RESULTS: Loperamide increased stool consistency with dose (p = 0.07) and this effect reduced continence problems during orlistat treatment (p < 0.05). A bell-shaped dose-response relationship was present with anal sphincter function (p < 0.01) and anorectal sensitivity (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Loperamide has beneficial effects on stool consistency and continence in obese subjects taking orlistat. The effect on stool consistency appeared more important than effects on anorectal function.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Relationship between loperamide-induced sedative effect and digoxin pharmacokinetics in healthy Japanese subjects.

PURPOSE: Loperamide-induced suppressive effects on central nervous system closely relate to a lack of or decline in the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function. The aim of this study was to determine the loperamide-induced sedative effect quantitatively and to investigate possible alterations in the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, a substrate for P-gp, in Japanese subjects. METHODS: Loperamide hydrochloride (2 mg) was administered orally to 26 subjects and the critical flicker-fusion frequency threshold (CFF) values were measured every 30 min separately by portable instrument. Further, digoxin (0.25 mg) was administered to 8 subjects, and the plasma concentration was determined. RESULTS: In five subjects who complained of drowsiness, the CFF values more remarkably decreased compared with those in the other subjects. The Tmax and mean residence time (MRT) values of digoxin pharmacokinetics in four subjects with drowsiness were significantly lower and Cmax was higher than those in four subjects with marginal effect. Moreover, there were good correlations between the CFF value-time profile and the Cmax, Tmax, and MRT of digoxin. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of the CFF value after oral administration of loperamide will be useful for evaluating varied P-gp function and for anticipating individual variations in the disposition of P-gp substrates in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Safety and efficacy of loperamide.

Loperamide is a safe and effective antidiarrheal for the treatment of acute diarrhea. Efficacy data suggest that loperamide is more effective than the prescription drug diphenoxylate and an over-the-counter bismuth subsalicylate preparation. Loperamide is a safe drug, with few adverse reactions reported worldwide. It also lacks significant abuse potential. Loperamide may prove to be the antidiarrheal agent of choice when compared with currently available nonprescription treatments for acute diarrhea.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1990

A randomized, open-label comparison of nonprescription loperamide and attapulgite in the symptomatic treatment of acute diarrhea.

The efficacy of nonprescription doses of loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium A-D) was compared with nonfibrous activated attapulgite (Diasorb) in a randomized, parallel, open-label study of adult patients with acute diarrhea. The results of the study showed loperamide to be more effective than attapulgite in the control of diarrhea. Loperamide significantly reduced stool frequency compared with attapulgite, particularly within the first 12-hour period following the start of therapy, and significantly shortened the mean time to last unformed stool (loperamide, 14.2 hours, versus attapulgite, 19.5 hours). Subjective evaluations of severity of enteric symptoms, overall relief following treatment, and overall relief after 48 hours of treatment were equivalent for both drugs. Both treatments were well tolerated, and there was no difference between treatments with respect to the proportion of patients reporting adverse experiences.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1988

Opioid and non-opioid actions of loperamide on cholinergic nerve function in human isolated colon.

Using a radiolabelling technique it was possible to measure changes of cholinergic nerve activity in human isolated taenia coli muscle. Loperamide (1.9-97.3 microM) depressed release of acetylcholine produced by electrical field stimulation to a greater degree than morphine (0.13-130 microM). The effect of loperamide was only partially sensitive to naloxone. Loperamide (7.8 microM) demonstrated calcium channel blocking-like properties as shown by its antagonism of CaCl2-induced contractions of depolarised muscle. Although an established calcium channel antagonist, verapamil, was also able to depress cholinergic nerve activity, the concentration was considerably greater than required for antagonism of CaCl2 contractions. The depression of acetylcholine release by loperamide may contribute to its anti-diarrhoeal properties.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1990

Normalization of small intestinal propulsion with loperamide-like antidiarrheals in rats.

Gastrointestinal propulsion and the presence of diarrhea were assessed in rats pretreated with various opioids and challenged orally with either castor or paraffin oil, which both contained phenol red as a marker of gastrointestinal propulsion. In solvent-pretreated rats, diarrhea was always observed within 90 min after castor oil, reflecting a state of hyperpropulsive activity of the gut, but never (up to 8 h) after paraffin oil, reflecting normal intestinal propulsion (which amounted to an average distance of 91% of the total length of the small intestine in 90 min). Paraffin oil propulsion was blocked (to values less than 60%) by all opioids tested with the exception of the gut-selective compounds loperamide, loperamide oxide and fluperamide oxide (ED50s: greater than or equal to 160 mg/kg). Castor oil diarrhea was antagonized by all opioids tested and, at comparable but slightly (1.3-2.6 times) higher doses, propulsion was normalized to values (less than 100%) comparable to those measured in paraffin oil-challenged control rats. Castor oil propulsion was further reduced to subnormal values (less than 60%) by still higher doses of the opioids, comparable to those that blocked propulsion after paraffin oil. However, the required dose increment varied consistently among the opioids tested and ranged, depending on gut selectivity, from a factor 2.3 times the antidiarrheal dose for narcotic analgesics such as pethidine and dextromoramide to greater than 300 for antidiarrheals such as loperamide, loperamide oxide and fluperamide oxide. Protection from diarrhea and normalization of propulsion showed a close correlation; both failed to correlate with central analgesic activity and are thought to be mediated via peripheral opioid receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analgesics↗
PubMed1990

Inhibition by loperamide of chloride transport across canine cultured tracheal epithelium.

We studied the effect of loperamide on electrical properties of canine cultured tracheal epithelium by Ussing's short-circuited technique. Addition of loperamide to the mucosal bath decreased the short-circuit current, transepithelial potential difference and conductance, whereas submucosal loperamide had no effect. This inhibitory effect was attenuated by furosemide, diphenylamine-2-carboxylate and Cl(-)-free medium but not by amiloride or naloxone. Thus, loperamide may selectively inhibit Cl- secretion across airway epithelium through a non-opiate-dependent mechanism.

Amiloride↗
PubMed1982

Loperamide in rat intestines: a unique disposition.

When everted sacs of rat duodenum, jejunum and ileum were incubated with [14C]loperamide in vitro, unchanged drug and its metabolites were found not only in tissues but also in media of the mucosal side with virtually no radioactivity in media of the serosal side. The amounts of metabolites found in media of the mucosal side were comparable to or larger than those in tissues. Di-desmethyl loperamide was more predominant in the media as compared with mono-demethylated one than in the tissues. Therefore, a portion of loperamide absorbed in intestines can be metabolized there and directly secreted back into lumen. Oral loperamide thus undergoes a unique disposition, likely constituting one of mechanisms for its distinct dissociation of central and antidiarrheal activities.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

The neuropharmacology of loperamide-induced emesis in the ferret: the role of the area postrema, vagus, opiate and 5-HT3 receptors.

Loperamide, an opiate receptor agonist, commonly used in the treatment of diarrhoea, reliably induced emesis in the ferret, when given subcutaneously. The response latency was short (less than 10 min) and the emesis lasted for approx 70 min. The dose-response curve for the emetic response was "bell-shaped" and all animals responded at 0.5 mg/kg but none at 5 mg/kg (s.c.). The response was unaffected by dopamine D2 receptor antagonism (domperidone 1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) or 5-HT3 receptor antagonism (granisetron or ondansetron 1.0 mg/kg, s.c.). The onset of the response was delayed for about 60 min by naloxone or naloxone methiodide (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and abolished by naloxanazine (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.), reported to be relatively selective for mu receptors. The results implicate mu receptors (possibly mu 1) in the induction of emesis by loperamide and provide some support for activation of opiate receptors also having anti-emetic effects, as suggested in previous studies. The emetic response to loperamide was unaffected by abdominal vagotomy but was abolished by ablation of the area postrema, indicating that loperamide-induced emesis may be used as a test for ablation of the area postrema in studies of the emetic mechanism in the ferret.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Validation of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of loperamide in human plasma.

A sensitive and selective method based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been developed for the quantitative determination of loperamide in human plasma. Automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) on disposable extraction cartridges (DEC) is used to isolate the compounds from the biological matrix and to prepare a cleaner sample before injection and analysis in the LC-MS/MS system. After conditioning, the plasma sample is loaded on the DEC filled with endcapped ethyl silica (C2(EC)) and washed twice with water. The analytes are therefore eluted by dispensing methanol. The eluate is then collected and added with ammonium acetate solution in order to inject an aliquot of this final extract in the LC-MS/MS system. On-line LC-MS/MS system using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) has been developed for the determination of loperamide. The separation is obtained on a octadecylsilica based stationary phase using a mobile phase consisting in a mixture of methanol and 5mM ammonium acetate solution (25:75, v/v). Clonazepam is used as internal standard (IS). The MS/MS ion transitions monitored are m/z 477--> 266 and 316--> 270 for loperamide and clonazepam, respectively. The most appropriate regression model of the response function as well as the limit of quantitation were first selected during the pre-validation step. These latter criteria were then assessed during the formal validation step. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was around 50 pg/ml for loperamide. The method was also validated with respect to recovery, precision, trueness, accuracy and linearity.

Antidiarrheals↗
PubMed2006

Antihyperalgesic effects of loperamide in a model of rat neuropathic pain are mediated by peripheral delta-opioid receptors.

The possible antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic activity of loperamide, an opioid agonist which does not readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier, were examined in the spinal nerve ligation model of experimental neuropathic pain. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of loperamide effectively reversed thermal hyperalgesia. In contrast, loperamide had minimal effects on cold allodynia and no effects on mechanical allodynia. The antihyperalgesic action of loperamide against noxious heat was antagonized by naltrindole, a delta-opioid receptor selective antagonist, but not by pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine, a mu-opioid receptor selective antagonist, or administration of nor-binaltorphimine, a kappa-opioid receptor selective antagonist. Furthermore, i.p. injection of [d-Ala(2), Glu(4)]-deltorphin II, a delta-opioid receptor selective peptide agonist, also reversed thermal hyperalgesia. The present results suggest that thermal hyperalgesia in experimental neuropathic pain can be reduced through activation of peripheral delta-opioid receptors. The data suggest the possible application of peripherally restricted and delta-opioid receptor selective agonists in the treatment of some aspects of neuropathic pain without many of the side effects associated with centrally acting opioids and without the peripheral side effects of opioid agonists acting at mu-receptors.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1986

Symptomatic treatment of acute infectious diarrhoea: loperamide versus placebo in a double-blind trial.

One hundred and twelve patients with acute infectious diarrhoea were entered in a double-blind randomised study in order to compare loperamide with a placebo. Of 82 evaluable patients, 38 received loperamide and 44 placebo for a maximum of 5 days. There were no significant differences in the number of loose stools during the first day of treatment, in the total number of tablets taken or in the total duration of the period of diarrhoea between the two treatment groups. The loperamide-treated patients had significantly fewer loose stools during the observation period of 5 days than did the placebo treated patients, median five vs. seven, a difference of little clinical importance. Excretion of bacterial pathogens was followed weekly in 13 of the loperamide treated patients (median 35.5 days) and in 18 of the placebo treated patients (median 22.5 days). This difference in the duration of excretion was not significant.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Effects of racecadotril and loperamide on bacterial proliferation and on the central nervous system of the newborn gnotobiotic piglet.

METHODS: The effects of 4 days of oral administration of different doses of two drugs, an enkephalinase inhibitor (the antisecretory agent, racecadotril) and a mu-receptor agonist (loperamide), on intestinal growth of a bacterial nonpathogenic strain (Escherichia coli E 404) and on the central nervous system (CNS) were compared in newborn gnotobiotic piglets. RESULTS: The E. coli content of the proximal jejunum (segment S1) and the E. coli ratio of stomach:segment S1 were similar in the racecadotril (20 mg/kg b.d., n = 5) and control groups. In contrast, in the loperamide group (1 mg/kg b.d., n = 4), the E. coli content of segment S1 and the E. coli ratio stomach:S1 were both significantly higher than with racecadotril or control (P = 0.04 and 0.005, respectively, for E. coli content; P = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively, for stomach:S1). There were no clinical signs of neurotoxicity and no deaths with racecadotril given orally at a high dose of 130 mg/kg b.d. (n = 5)--nearly 60 times the paediatric dosage. In contrast, an equivalent high dose of loperamide (5 mg/kg b.d.) resulted in death in three out of four piglets. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to loperamide, racecadotril did not induce bacterial overgrowth and did not produce central neurotoxicity.

Animals↗
PubMed1981

Loperamide in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis in early childhood. Report of a two centre, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Loperamide at a dose of 0 . 2 mg/kg/day was compared with placebo in the treatment of acute infantile gastro-enteritis in hospital-based double-blind clinical trials carried out in parallel in Liverpool, England and Benghazi, Libya. Fifty patients aged one month to four years entered the study in each centre. Rotavirus was the predominant pathogen isolated in both centres. Pathogenic Escherichia coli was cultured from five children in the Liverpool study only. No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of diarrhoea, length of stay in hospital or weight gain during the first 48 h after admission, between loperamide and placebo groups in either centre. Loperamide, in the dosage used in this study, appears to have no significant effect on the course of acute gastro-enteritis in early childhood. The possibility that these results may reflect specifically on rotavirus infection is discussed. No toxic effects of loperamide were observed.

Body Weight↗
PubMed1987

Loperamide in acute diarrhoea in childhood: results of a double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial.

Fifty-three young children with acute diarrhoea were included in a hospital-based, double-blind trial of loperamide at two dose levels (0.4 and 0.8 mg/kg/day), given with standard oral rehydration therapy versus placebo plus oral rehydration therapy. The differences in the overall recovery rate were significant (P less than 0.05), the fastest being in the group given 0.8 mg/kg and slowest in the placebo group. Comparison between weights on admission and weights by day 3 showed that more children in the loperamide groups gained weight than in the placebo group (P less than 0.05). No serious side effects of loperamide were observed. The drug was withdrawn in one child because of excessive lethargy and sleep. The results indicate that loperamide in the doses employed is safe and may be a useful adjunct to oral rehydration in certain children.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1993

Subcutaneous octreotide versus oral loperamide in the treatment of diarrhea following chemotherapy.

Forty patients with chemotherapy-related diarrhea were randomized to receive (i) octreotide 0.5 mg three times per day s.c. or (ii) loperamide 4 mg three times per day p.o. until complete remission of diarrhea was achieved. In the octreotide group 80% of patients showed complete resolution of loose bowel movements within 4 days of therapy, while in the loperamide group this goal was obtained in only 30% of cases (p < 0.001). If after 4 days no benefit was seen, patients were considered to have failed antidiarrheal therapy. Failure was recorded in only one case (5%) treated with s.c. octreotide and in five patients (25%) who received loperamide. The mean duration of antidiarrheal therapy necessary to achieve remission was 3.4 days in the octreotide group and 6.1 days in the loperamide group (p < 0.001). Treatment with octreotide was very well tolerated with mild abdominal pain in 15% of cases and pain in the injection site in 15% of patients. Subcutaneous octreotide is highly effective in the management of chemotherapy-related diarrhea in cancer patients.

Administration, Oral↗