Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lifting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Intraabdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting--effect of abdominal muscle training in healthy subjects.

Isometric training of the abdominal muscles is recommended as a preventive measure against low back complaints in the hope that the increased strength of the abdominal muscles should result in an increased intraabdominal pressure when lifting. There is, however, neither experimental nor clinical proof of this hypothesis. Twenty healthy young men went through intense isometric training of the abdominal muscles for five weeks. Before and after training the subjects were put through a standardized test programme, measuring the strength of abdominal and back muscles, and a series of lifts, 10, 25, and 40 kg, leg lifts and back lifts. The intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and the EMG activity of the oblique abdominal muscles, and of the erector spinae muscle were recorded. It was found that: The strength of the trunk flexors increased markedly after training. The activity of the oblique abdominal muscles when lifting decreased after training, i.e. motor unit recruitment was not improved. The IAP at lifting was not affected by training. The activity of the oblique abdominal muscles was of no decisive importance to the IAP. The strength of the back muscles increased, but the activity of the back muscles at lifts was not affected by training. In back lifts there was no detectable activity of the back muscles during the beginning of the lifting and during a great part of the lowering. In back lifts the maximum activity of the abdominal muscles appeared long before the peak of the IAP which may be of importance with regard to the pathogenesis of inguinal hernia. Further investigation is needed, both to study the effect of training on patients with back complaints, and to study the factors determining the IAP.

Abdomen↗

The forehead lift: endoscopic versus coronal approaches.

Rejuvenation surgery of the upper one-third of the face can be accomplished by a number of well-known techniques and approaches. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine if endoscopic-assisted forehead lifts achieve the same degree of correction as the coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts, (2) to assess the effect of concurrent blepharoplasty on brow elevation, and (3) to evaluate long-term results of coronal/ pretrichial forehead lifts. The study was a retrospective blinded comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs of patients who underwent forehead lifts. In order to control for the differences in photographs, ratios of distances were measured utilizing standard anthropometric sites of the brow, medial canthus, and subnasale. All reviewed cases were operated on by the same surgeon (S.W. Perkins, M.D.). A total of 140 patients having undergone forehead lift procedures and with 12-month postoperative photographic documentation were included in the study. Of these 121 patients had coronal forehead lifts and 19 had endoscopic-assisted forehead lifts. Results revealed that at 1 year follow-up both methods achieved brow elevation without a significant difference in the approach. Concomitant blepharoplasty had no statistical effect on brow position. Additionally, long-term follow-up on the coronal/pretrichial lifts revealed a gradual drop in brow position over 5 years. We conclude that both endoscopic and coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts provide for comparable elevation at 1-year follow-up. Concomitant blepharoplasty has minimal to no significant effect on brow position. Brow elevation in coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts may be temporary.

Blepharoplasty↗

Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting.

A study was performed to determine the influence of load magnitude on the self selected technique of lifting. Specifically, it was hypothesized that with heavier weights a tendency would occur to lift more with the back and less with the legs. Flexion-extension moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joints were calculated for subjects when lifting boxes weighing from 50 to 250 N. Lifts were performed using a freestyle technique at normal speed. The moment profiles (moment plotted vs time) were analyzed kinematically and as a function of the weight lifted. The kinematics of the lift changed as the weight increased. The moment at the L5/S1 level increased with increasing weight, however, the corresponding knee moment decreased. Thus, an inverse relationship was found between the moment at the L5/S1 level and the knee joint moment. An increase in weight lifted was also associated with an increase in the angular velocity at the knee while lifting. Apparently with heavier weights there is a tendency to extend the knees earlier during the lift than with lighter weights, confirming our hypothesis. This explains the reduced knee moment. Our findings lead to the hypothesis that quadriceps muscle strength limits the subjects' ability to lift with their knees flexed.

Adult↗

Lumbar spine intersegmental motion analysis during lifting.

UNLABELLED: There are a lot of in vitro and also in vivo studies under strictly restricted and subject-demanding laboratory conditions using X-ray or MRI recordings, but very few studies give information about the lumbar spine intersegmental behavior in daily life activities. Aims of this study were to measure the intersegmental lumbar spine motions during lifting trials and to determine the different motion patterns of different subjects performing comparable lifting tasks. First, 11 healthy volunteers had to perform lifting tasks (box weight 4-15 kg) using their favorite lifting technique (no instructions by the researcher). The coordinates of skin-markers attached on lumbar spines of the subjects were measured using 3D-motion capturing and then transformed to Cardan-angles. Second, 23 volunteers performed lifting tasks (box weight 4-15 kg) with the instruction to bend their knees during lifting. Coordinates of this smaller set of markers on lumbar spines of the subjects were transformed to intersegmental angles using a spline-method. From the first experiment three groups of motion patterns are distinguishable: subjects who used only small intersegmental range of motion within their upper lumbar spine and bended their knees during lifting were in contrast to subjects who used 3.25 times wider range of motion in the upper lumbar spine and did not bend the knees (cluster analysis, c = 0.76). The third group was not assignable to these other two groups. Within all lifting trials of the second experiment different groups were detectable also: in spite of all subjects bended their knees, there were subjects with wide range of motion of lumbar spine motion segments. Other subjects were able to reduce intersegmental range of motion (k-means clustering, msv > 0.47). From this it follows that the intersegmental motion of lumbar spine is individually different and not equal for all lumbar levels. Furthermore, lifting technique influenced the motion of the lumbar spine. But not for all subjects, the advice to bend the knees during the lifting effectively reduced the lumbar motion ranges. IN CONCLUSION: special instructions to reduce lumbar spinal motion are recommended. Due to different lumbar spine motion patterns, different loading situations are anticipated because of changing lever arms and angular accelerations. This understanding is important in reducing spinal loading and to prevent spinal disorders in manual material handling tasks.

Journal Article↗

Subjective assessment of fork-lift truck seats under laboratory conditions.

A subjective assessment of fork-lift truck seats has been carried out to assess the range of preferred seat dimensions and the acceptability of different seat adjustments to fork-lift truck drivers. Twelve fork-lift truck seats fitted to a fixed bench were assessed by twelve fork-lift truck drivers. For each seat, each driver completed a questionnaire that covered the following areas: eleven seat dimensions, four seat adjustments and other features (arm rests, safety belts and safety wings). The drivers assessed the dimensions of a seat chosen at random, before moving to the adjacent seat in either a clockwise or anticlockwise direction. Before each assessment, they were asked to look forward and backward in the seat as though they were driving a fork-lift truck. In general, significant correlations were obtained between the subjective assessments and objective measurements of the seat dimensions. This enabled preferred seat dimension ranges to be defined. Fork-lift truck drivers ranked the forward-backward and the backrest inclination adjustments as most important. The results showed that although the drivers had previous experience in the use of suspension seats, they did not understand the purpose of the weight adjustment. All adjustments should be easy to find, accessible, easy to move and they should enable a range of adjustments. In addition, clear and simple information on the seat is needed, especially for the weight adjustment. The most recently designed seats generally had dimensions within the preferred ranges compared with the older generation seats, mainly because they had more adjustments. However, the results show that adjustments on fork-lift truck seats could be improved further. Some tentative conclusions are made for the preferred fork-lift truck seat dimensions and adjustment ranges which are based on the evidence from this restricted sample of fork-lift truck drivers. They may be useful for seat and truck designers in the preparation of a standard on fork-lift truck seat dimensions.

Adult↗

Biomechanic effects of a contralateral shoe-lift on walking with an immobilized knee.

OBJECTIVES: A previous study demonstrated that when one knee is artificially immobilized, a contralateral shoe-lift improves the oxygen cost of walking. This study was undertaken to evaluate the kinematic and kinetic effects associated with this shoe-lift. DESIGN: Motion analysis and force platform data were collected in subjects walking (1) normally, (2) with one knee immobilized, (3) with one knee immobilized and with a one-half-inch shoe-lift applied to the contralateral, nonimmobilized shoe, and (4) with a one-inch shoe-lift similarly applied. Kinematic and kinetic data from three trials of each condition were compared graphically and statistically using a repeated measures analysis of variance. SETTING: A gait laboratory. SUBJECTS: Eight able-bodied subjects without known neurologic or musculoskeletal problems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fifty-two peak kinematic and kinetic variables during various phases of the gait cycle. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < .05) between the normal and immobilized knee conditions were noted in 22 variables; however, significant differences between the immobilized knee conditions were found in only 4 variables. There were small improvements with the shoe-lifts toward normal in peak hip abduction, hip abduction at 20% to 30% of the gait cycle, and in peak knee extension moment on the nonimmobilized side. There was a small change away from normal in peak knee extension moment on the immobilized-side for the 1" shoe-lift. CONCLUSION: Wearing a contralateral shoe-lift when one knee is immobilized is associated with only small changes in kinematic and kinetic parameters. The shoe-lift may slightly reduce the need for compensatory hip abduction and vaulting on the nonimmobilized side. Importantly, no adverse biomechanic effect from the shoe-lift was noted except for a slightly increased peak knee extension moment on the immobilized side found for the 1" but not the 1"/2 shoe-lift.

Adult↗

The effect of timing of a perturbation on the execution of a lifting movement.

Anticipation to the mass magnitude is important in lifting, but underestimation of a mass, in contrast to overestimation, does not cause major movement disturbances. This may be caused by corrections in muscle activity before the object is actually lifted. This study was designed to assess the importance of these corrections during the loading phase for the execution of a lifting movement when the mass is underestimated. Ten subjects lifted a box (1.6 kg), of which the mass was increased by 10 kg without them knowing so. The mass was added either before the box had been lifted from the ground (perturbation before lift-off, PBL) or right perturbation after lift-off (PAL). In the PBL condition back muscle activity was increased before lift-off. Even though this early corrective response could obviously not occur in the PAL condition, the lifting movement was executed without clear problems. In sum, corrections in muscle activity before lift-off are not necessary for adequate correction of a perturbation induced by an unexpected heavier object.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Lifting of lesions during endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early colorectal cancer: implications for the assessment of resectability.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study assessed the indications for and limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early colorectal cancer, focusing on the way in which the lesion lifts after submucosal injection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 94 patients with early colorectal cancer who received EMR treatment. The lifting of the lesion after submucosal injection was analyzed (classified as completely lifted/soft; completely lifted/hard; incompletely lifted; and non-lifted) along with the endoscopic findings, pathological findings, and clinical course. RESULTS: Almost all completely lifted/soft lesions were mucosal cancers. Some of the completely lifted/hard lesions were staged as sm2. The incompletely lifted lesions included stages sm1 to sm3. Non-lifting lesions were almost always deeper than sm3. The lifting condition was significantly associated with the depth of invasion, and the lesion type was related to the extent of lifting but not to tumor size or recurrent disease. Recurrent disease was noted in three patients who underwent piecemeal EMR. CONCLUSIONS: The indication for EMR is easily assessed on the basis of the lifting characteristics of the tumor after submucosal injection, which was found to be significantly related to the depth of invasion. The factor limiting the indication for EMR is not the size of a tumor, but its lifting condition.

Aged↗

Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance.

Previous research has found isoinertial strength testing to be superior to isometric and isokinetic strength testing for prediction of task performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate tests on an isoinertial lifting machine (ILM) and their ability to predict performance on actual lifting tasks. Sixteen male subjects performed two lifting tasks: maximum box lift to truck-bed height of 1.35 m; and 'speed lifts' of 60 concrete blocks (each 22.7 kg) to the same height. These performance tests were compared to three ILM tests: a maximal lift to 1.83 m, a second maximal lift to 1.52 m, and an endurance test that entailed 60 timed ILM lifts of 22.7 kg to 1.83 m. Pearson product-moment correlations between ILM tests and performance tasks varied from r = 0.55 to 0.71. Therefore, the isoinertial test protocols employed in this study were able to account for only 30% to 50% of the variance in the performance of maximal lifting and endurance tasks. In was concluded that prediction of maximal lifting ability or endurance ability using an ILM might be enhanced by closer approximation of specific task variables, or by inclusion of dynamic parameters to measure technique.

Adult↗

Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.

The objective of this study was to evaluate five different lifting tasks based on subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back. Subjective estimates were obtained immediately after the subjects performed the lifting tasks. Rankings for different tasks were obtained according to the perceived level of stress at the lower back. A biomechanical model was used to predict the compressive force at the L5/S1 disc for the weight lifted considering link angles for the particular posture. The tasks were also ranked according to the compressive force loading at the L5/S1 disc. The weight lifted in these tasks for obtaining the subjective estimate of stress was the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWOL). This was determined separately for each subject using a psychophysical approach. Subjective estimates of stress were obtained for infrequent lifting, specifically for a single lift, as well as for lifting at a frequency of four lifts per min. The results showed that a lifting task acceptable from the biomechanical point of view may not be judged as a safe or acceptable task by the worker based on his subjective perception. This may result in a risk of the worker not performing the recommended task or not following the recommended method.

Adult↗

The relation between isometric lifting strength and muscular fitness measures.

The purpose of this study was to construct an isometric lift dynamometer and relate isometric lifting strength to dynamic measures of muscular fitness, leg and back strength and muscular power output. Thirty-one male subjects, aged 19-24 years, performed a standing broad jump (for distance), a vertical jump (for flight time), 3 maximal pulls (for peak power) on a rowing ergometer and maximal isometric leg and back extensions on a conventional dynamometer. The results of these tests were correlated with the maximum isometric lifting strength (MILS) obtained on the lift dynamometer using cluster correlation and multiple regression. Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between isometric lifting strength and back strength (BS) (r = 0.59), and leg strength (LS) (r = 0.74). A significant correlation was also noted between isometric lifting strength and both standing broad jump (SBJ) (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and power output (PO) (r = 0.38, (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis was used to predict lifting performance from a battery of standard fitness tests. The prediction equation for maximal isometric lifting strength included the terms LS, BS, SBJ and PO (r = 0.80). The relation between isometric lifting strength and other muscular fitness variables suggest that the method used provides an acceptable measure of strength and an indication of the involvement of back and leg musculature in squat lifting.

Adult↗

Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.

Many believe that biomechanical models and data are not sufficiently refined and validated to be used as the basis for setting 'safe' population load lifting limits. Rather, they advocate that such limits should be based on what a sample of the population demonstrate to be 'maximum acceptable weight limits' (MAWL) resulting from psychophysical tests performed with different populations. Yet, biomechanical models are becoming more robust and valid. Computerized versions of these models are readily available, and these models now can provide a more complete understanding of the pathophysiology of a person's spinal column and supporting structures, thereby providing a means to predict the risk of tissue trauma in given lifting situations for large size populations. NIOSH has recognized the validity of both biomechanics and psychophysics for establishing a Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) in the United States. The implications of using both types of methods and data are explored in this paper. Three case studies are presented that involve infrequent lifting of varied size boxes from near floor level to explore how MAWL and biomechanically determined limits differ. The cases include symmetric, sagittal plane lifting using a freestyle posture, a similar lift but with freestyle and squat lift postures, and an asymmetric load lifting task. In all three case comparisons it is shown that a recommended load to be lifted based solely on a spinal disc compression force tolerance of 3400 N would be much lower than published MAWL values representing 75% or even 90% of young males under 40 years old (i.e. MAWL values may not be protective of some young males). It also is shown that MAWL values do not have as much population variance as the spinal motion segment failure values. Hence, many younger males would be expected to have spinal columns that can tolerate the highest published MAWL values. Several mitigating factors, including load lifting trajectories, lifting dynamics, and biomechanical modeling limitations are discussed, as well as differences in compressive force tolerances and MAWLs associated with age and gender.

Adult↗

Fatigue-related changes in the coordination of lifting and their effect on low back load.

In this study, changes in movement coordination caused by fatigue that developed during repetitive lifting were examined. Five men performed 6 times a 5-min bout of lifting an 8-kg barbell at 15 lifts/min, using two lifting techniques; one minimized trunk rotation (squat lift), and the other minimized rotation in the knee joint (stoop lift). Kinematics and dynamics were studied by means of movement analysis and inverse dynamics, using a two-dimensional linked segment model. Within-subject variation over repetitive lifts of the time course of joint angles was smaller than between-subjects variation on the first analyzed lift. Relative timing between joint rotations did not change significantly across repetitive lifts, except between knee and hip in the squat lift. No change of the lumbosacral torque over repetitive lifts was found. The adaptability of the neural control appeared to be sufficient to accommodate the strong changes of the input-output characteristics of the muscles caused by fatigue so that an essentially constant performance of the movement act was maintained.

Journal Article↗

Back support mechanisms during manual lifting.

The ability of individuals to lift heavy loads without injury to the vertebral elements has led to the formulation of several explanations of this phenomenon. In this article, the existing literature on lifting is reviewed and mechanisms of back support during lifting are described. These mechanisms include the intra-abdominal pressure mechanism, the thoracolumbar fascia mechanism, and combinations of these mechanisms with the use of the erector spinae, multifidus, and psoas muscles. Physical therapists are often responsible for teaching patients and workers "proper" lifting techniques; however, controversy exists concerning the proper lift. Although lifting with the lower back in flexion and lifting in extension have been proposed, there are indications for each depending on individual circumstances. Lifting instructions for workers without low back injuries should be distinguished from instructions for patients with low back pain. General rules for lifting include: plan the lift, avoid twisting, keep the load close to the body, and bend at the knees.

Back↗

[Temporal lift].

UNLABELLED: The temporal lift belongs to the traditional face lift which is in fact temporo-cervico-facial. It also forms part of the face lift "upper part of the face" which is in fact temporo-frontal. It is to say that it relates to a junction zone between the superior and inferior part of the face. OBJECTIVES: In a first part the authors recall the essential anatomical data including the eyebrow, the Charpy's fat pad, the galea and the temporoparietal fascia, the nerves (temporo-facial branch of the facial nerve and supra-orbital nerve) and the veins (sentinel vein). Then they expose the various surgical techniques (galeapexy, endoscopic temporal lift, brow lift, facial threads, standard fixing Endotine forehead, botulinic toxin. This makes it possible to define in a more precise way the indications and counterindications of the temporal lift. CONCLUSION: The indications of the temporal lift are the lateral ptosis of the tail of the brow. On the other hand, the total ptosis requires a frontal lift. In this case one can associate a concomitant blepharoplasty. The temporal lift is frequently carried out in a way combined with a cervico-cheek lift. The prospects for technical progress to improve perenniality of an isolated temporal gesture are large and will allow us to widen the indications.

Blepharoplasty↗

Effects of lifting techniques on energy expenditure: a preliminary investigation.

A preliminary study of the effects of different lifting techniques (mechanical lift, rocking axillary, self-lift, shoulder-assist, and straight-pull) was conducted. Fourteen female subjects participated. Measures of oxygen consumption, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure were recorded at six one-minute intervals during baseline and lift phases. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted on each measure for each phase using a two-factor repeated factor. In the baseline phase, no significant differences were obtained for the lift factor. The time factor yielded significant main effects for oxygen consumption, p less than .0001, and heart rate, p less than .0001. These effects were associated with one and two minutes following the subject's return to bed. In the lift phase, significant main effects were obtained for lift and time factors on oxygen consumption, p less than .0005 and p less than .0001. Significant main effects were obtained for the time factor on heart rate, p less than .0001, respiratory rate, p less than .0006, and systolic blood pressure, p less than .0045. Finally, a significant main effect was noted for the lift factor on diastolic blood pressure, p less than .022. These findings suggest that the mechanical lift is the most taxing on the person being lifted.

Analysis of Variance↗

The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a biomechanical study of the effect of the initial horizontal distance between a person lifting and the load. Experimental data were analyzed using a dynamic rigid link model. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the initial horizontal load placement on the moments acting on the lumbar spine and the lower extremity joints during lifting, and to determine the role of the lower extremities during lifting from the floor. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidemiologic studies have implicated lifting as a cause of back pain, and over 80% of all worker's compensation back injuries are considered to be caused by manual material handling Guidelines have been proposed to increase the safety of lifting, but they are primarily based on static biomechanical analyses, psychophysical data, and physiologic limitations. METHODS: Each of 12 male subjects lifted a weight box containing 0 to 300 N, in 100-N increments. Each subject performed 20 lifts--four weights at five horizontal distances (20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 cm). Motion was measured with an optoelectronic system, ground reaction forces were measured with a force plate, and moments were calculated using a rigid link model. RESULTS: The peak predicted L5-S1 moment increased as the weight and horizontal distance increased. The influence of horizontal distance on moment magnitude was nonlinear. As the distance changed from 20 to 40 cm, the distance-related rate of increase was approximately one-half of that occurring with a distance change from 40 to 60 cm. This can be explained by the need to reach out further, beyond 40 cm, which is accomplished by a deeper flexion of the knees and ankles and an anterior translation of the upper body and arms. CONCLUSION: As the horizontal distance at the start of a lift increased, the peak moment acting on the lumbar spine also increased, but the increase was nonlinear. This is explained by a change in the technique of lifting when the distance is 40 cm or greater.

Adolescent↗

Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, trunk muscle activation and force during isokinetic lifting and lowering.

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), force and electromyographic (EMG) activity from the abdominal (intra-muscular) and trunk extensor (surface) muscles were measured in seven male subjects during maximal and sub-maximal sagittal lifting and lowering with straight arms and legs. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to provide five constant velocities (0.12-0.96 m.s-1) of lifting (pulling against the resistance of the motor) and lowering (resisting the downward pull of the motor). For the maximal efforts, position-specific lowering force was greater than lifting force at each respective velocity. In contrast, corresponding IAPs during lowering were less than those during lifting. Highest mean force occurred during slow lowering (1547 N at 0.24 m.s-1) while highest IAP occurred during the fastest lifts (17.8 kPa at 0.48-0.96 m.s-1). Among the abdominal muscles, the highest level of activity and the best correlation to variations in IAP (r = 0.970 over velocities) was demonstrated by the transversus abdominis muscle. At each velocity the EMG activity of the primary trunk and hip extensors was less during lowering (eccentric muscle action) than lifting (concentric muscle action) despite higher levels of force (r between -0.896 and -0.851). Sub-maximal efforts resulted in IAP increasing linearly with increasing lifting or lowering force (r = 0.918 and 0.882, respectively). However, at any given force IAP was less during lowering than lifting. This difference was negated if force and IAP were expressed relative to their respective lifting and lowering maxima.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abdomen↗