Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Hospital Restructuring”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Clinical and human resource planning for the downsizing of psychiatric hospitals: the British Columbia experience.

Riverview Hospital, B.C.'s only and Canada's largest remaining provincial psychiatric hospital began a formal planned "downsizing" process in 1992. This initiative was an important element in the Province's strategic plan to shift to a more community-focused mental health system and to bring tertiary psychiatric services "closer to home" by redeveloping Riverview Hospital on three sites. The paper summarizes the literature pertaining to the "downsizing" of psychiatric hospital services in relation both to clinical and human resource planning. It describes the mental health system in B.C. and the service system context in which this exercise is occurring. It is based on the first three years of experience in identifying the major challenges and the strategies developed to meet these challenges. It draws some conclusions about the effectiveness of these strategies and it speculates about the likely future challenges as the "downsizing" process continues.

British Columbia↗

Hospital downsizing and patients' assaults on staff.

Although the downsizing and closing of state mental hospitals is occurring with increasing frequency nationwide, there appears to be only one case study of the clinical impacts of downsizing state hospitals. In this study, Snyder reported a four-fold increase in frequency of assaults on staff as the hospital census decreased. The present paper is a second case study of state hospital downsizing and closing in which the frequency of assaults on staff decreased by 63%. Possible explanations for the two differing outcomes are considered, and some general guidelines for the downsizing and closing of state hospitals are proposed.

Adolescent↗

Still attractive after all these years? Magnet hospitals in a changing health care environment.

This paper examines the research base for 'magnet hospitals'--hospitals that have a good reputation for recruitment and retention of registered nurses. It also assesses the extent to which the concept of the magnet hospital continues to have relevance to nursing in the United Kingdom (UK). The study reviews previous research, examines recent trends in nursing employment, and reports on case studies conducted as fieldwork research. The early research on magnet hospitals, conducted in the 1980s in the United States of America (USA), is reassessed in the light of subsequent cost containment driven changes in the USA nursing labour market and in the organization of USA hospitals. Many of these changes have impacted on nursing staff, with increases in workload, and with changes in skill mix, particularly as a result of increased use of care assistants. Similar developments have been happening in the UK. The paper examines the extent to which the concept of the magnet hospital can retain validity in this changing health care environment. Case studies in 14 USA magnet hospitals were conducted in 1997. The results highlight that, as a result of hospital reorganization and merger, some of these hospitals no longer exhibit core characteristics of 'magnetism', whilst others have retained these characteristics despite organizational change. The paper concludes by cautioning that the concept of the magnet hospital continues to have a relevance to the management of nursing resources, but that the research base, with some notable exceptions, continues to be weak and that there is a need for monitoring and a process of re- accreditation to maintain a 'live' register of magnet hospitals.

Career Mobility↗

Merger management: a challenge to nursing leadership.

AIM: The article reviews the merger process of two obstetric divisions. BACKGROUND: Mergers of acute care facilities are becoming common due to the need to move towards a market orientation. There is a growing emphasis on corporations, competition, and profit and cost control. Nursing leadership in managing merger processes is crucial. METHODS: Information originated from administrative decisions, feelings expressed by the staff, author observations, and statistical data. Data was analysed by illustrating the merger phases, compared to the literature and research studies. KEY ISSUES: Issues related to planning and preparing the process, the management of human resources, the development of organizational culture, and the physical changes, are vital. CONCLUSIONS: Planning ahead, involving all partners from the early stages, extensive dialogue among colleagues and strong nursing leadership are key elements for a smooth transition.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

External change and its impact on nurse management: a case study.

AIMS: This paper sets out to identify major changes in the tasks and responsibilities of the nurse manager at a small postgraduate unit in central London as it and its parent hospital group became subject to major changes in the policy and financial environment. What happened to the nurse manager's function could well make transparent some of the important changes still affecting nurse management more generally today. BACKGROUND: The article adds to the somewhat meagre academic literature which considers the middle management role in nursing. METHODS: The paper is based on a single yet detailed case study and the data were gathered by one of the authors over the period of change. The pros and cons of the dual researcher/participant role need to be considered along with the possibly wider significance of the case study. FINDINGS: The overriding conclusion is that nurse management in the specialist unit is evolving from a classic bureaucratic mode in which managerial authority, information and decision making were highly centralized to a much more devolved set of arrangements. Clearly a host of factors--e.g. the culture and history of the organization, and the personality types of the key players--could affect such change. However, this article concentrates on showing how the earlier, more centralized style was increasingly problematic in the rapidly changing circumstances faced by the unit. CONCLUSIONS: In understanding the wider significance of this particular case study, it seems important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology. If such changes in nurse management are widespread, they represent a new era for nursing in action and one perhaps more consonant with a profession whose status is being enhanced by developments such as diploma and graduate education and the development of specialist roles.

Hospital Restructuring↗

Improved trauma care after reorganisation: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To shorten the time to make a diagnosis and to begin definitive treatment of severely injured patients, thereby improving their medical care. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 61 patients who had sustained high-energy injuries, including head injury which required surgical intervention, and fracture of the femoral shaft before (1987-1988 n = 23) and after (1991-1993 n = 38) the reorganisation. INTERVENTION: Trauma care was reorganised during the year 1989-1990 and the concept of early multidisiplinary treatment with the general surgeon as trauma-leader was adopted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time required to make a diagnosis and begin definitive treatment as well as the assessment of medical care taking account of the patient's general condition and other injuries. RESULT: The immediate medical care was classified as delayed or inappropriate in 9 of 23 patients before, and in 2 of 38 patients after, the reorganisation (p = 0.001). The time needed to make a diagnosis was less than 4 hours in all cases. The time needed to start definitive treatment of head injuries was less than four hours in 9 of 12 patients before, and in 18 of 21 patients after the reorganisation. The internal fixation of femoral fractures was started within four hours in 2 of 11 femoral fractures before, compared with 12 of 17, after the reorganisation. CONCLUSION: The time to beginning definitive treatment of severe injuries was shorter after the reorganisation, as a result of early participation of members of the trauma team.

Accidental Falls↗

Re-engineering the hospital: a house without rooms.

Re-engineering of health care systems is defined, and the experience with re-engineering at a medical center is discussed. Re-engineering is a business concept that involves totally redesigning work processes to achieve much higher efficiencies and quality; it should not be confused with cost cutting, downsizing, and continuous improvement. Re-engineering seeks to combine multiple jobs into one, empower workers and make them more accountable, sequence the elements of work more naturally, create greater flexibility, and blur or remove organizational boundaries. Re-engineering at The Ohio State University Medical Center began with the formation of an operations improvement team consisting of department heads. Work processes were selected for re-engineering and prioritized, and teams were created to identify activities calling for radical change, such as activities that wasted time, could be done on an outpatient basis, or were duplicative. It was concluded that the redesign had to focus on the entire medical center, not the individual departments. A list of the characteristics of a better organization was prepared and distributed to the staff, along with other documents to help them understand the need for change. The operations improvement team specified expected outcomes of the re-engineering, and each re-engineering team developed measures of these outcomes. Many of the recommendations submitted have been implemented. One innovation has been the consolidation of the duties of utilization-review nurses, continuity-of-care nurses, social workers, and patient-education nurses into a single job category. When the medication-use re-engineering team meets, it will not be re-engineering the pharmacy department, it will be addressing the drug-use process. A medical center is re-engineering itself so that it will be able to continue to meet the health care needs of the community it serves.

Efficiency, Organizational↗

Collaborating with re-engineering consultants: maintaining resources for the future.

The negotiations of a pharmacy department with a consulting firm hired to help cut the institution's staff are described. In July 1994 Duke University Medical Center announced its intention to reduce the number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) from 6500 to 5000 and hired a consulting firm. The pharmacy department was scheduled to be studied for 16 weeks. The entire pharmacy staff was educated about the initiative and about what management expected of the staff during the process. Each assistant director of pharmacy was asked to lead the "operations improvement process," as the re-engineering plan was called, in his or her area of responsibility. The assistant directors were to describe key work activities and their time requirements and develop instruments for measuring work activities. Data were collected on supplemental resource requirements for paid time off and educational and meeting time. Resource requirements for clinical pharmacy specialists and other selected staff members were determined separately. The data were collected for one fiscal month, and the assistant directors then began negotiating human-resource requirements with the consultants. The director finalized the negotiations and presented the results to the hospital's leaders and the consulting firm's executives. It was proposed to reduce total pharmacy FTEs by only 5%, and the department actually gained 1 pharmacist FTE. Far greater reductions were proposed for most other departments (the entire medical center lost more than 800 FTEs). The pharmacy department at Duke dealt successfully with a re-engineering initiative. Strategies that contributed to the success included teamwork, active participation by the entire staff, empowering a core group to help lead in the process, and substantiating the value of the pharmacy's services to the medical center and its patients.

Consultants↗

Re-engineering for dramatic improvement in the medication-use process.

Planning for re-engineering the medication-use process at a university hospital is described. In summer 1992 the University of Cincinnati Hospital hired a consultant on quality to help with work-process improvement and re-engineering. By early 1993, re-engineering for patient-focused care was under way. Within a year of the implementation of patient-focused care in a pilot unit, it was realized that all departments that provided direct and indirect care would also have to undergo re-engineering. In August 1994 a retreat was held to begin the re-engineering effort in the pharmacy department. The retreat participants set as goals of the re-engineering (1) support of the hospital's strategic initiatives, (2) getting the right drug to the right patient at the right time, (3) improved patient outcomes, and (4) reducing the pharmacy labor and drug budget. Pharmacy activities for re-engineering were identified, and two planning teams were created, a pharmacy production team and a pharmacy knowledge-transfer team. The production team was made responsible for re-engineering dispensing, inspecting, producing, storing, and transporting, and the knowledge-transfer team was assigned teaching, recording, treating, and monitoring. A detailed plan was prepared for each team to follow using a framework provided by the consultant and consisting of strategy, technology, process, and personnel. Careful planning and a consultant helped a university hospital prepare for organizationwide re-engineering.

Focus Groups↗

Reengineering the role of a nurse manager in a patient-centered care organization.

The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in New York City expanded the role of a nurse manager to a manager and leader of the interdisciplinary team within a structure reorganized to focus on patients. As the literature noted the critical nature of the role of a middle manager, an interdisciplinary team reached the consensus that a registered nurse with progressive clinical and head nurse experience should be the first-line manager in a patient-centered care organization. The process of reengineering the role of a Patient Care Team Coordinator (PCTC), the support systems designed to develop the new leadership role, and the benefits associated with the changes implemented are discussed. The functional statement for the PCTC's position is included, as well as an organizational structure to show how staff are grouped to promote the continuity and coordination of care provided to patients.

Continuity of Patient Care↗

Effects of a faculty prepaid group practice in a pediatric primary care clinic.

Medical student and resident education at a hospital-operated pediatric primary care clinic (PPCC) was threatened by chronic financial deficits and by a state mandate that all patients receiving medical care through the state Aid to Families with Dependent Children program be enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO). To comply with the mandate, the PPCC was reorganized in 1984 as a faculty-operated prepaid group practice independent of the hospital. The new PPCC contracted with an HMO to provide care, with reimbursement based on capitation. The PPCC continues to serve the same patient population as before the reorganization, continues its teaching activities, and no longer has financial deficits. The experience at this clinic shows that converting to a faculty prepaid group practice can be cost-effective, promote efficiency, and improve faculty-hospital relations. Such a group practice is an appropriate organization for maintaining medical education programs while providing care in a capitation payment system.

Aid to Families with Dependent Children↗

Evaluation of the VA's Pilot Program in Institutional Reorganization toward Primary and Ambulatory Care: Part I, Changes in process and outcomes of care.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the reorganization of an academic Veterans Affairs medical center toward primary and ambulatory care--including the implementation of a medical-center-wide interdisciplinary firm system and ambulatory care training program--on the quality of primary ambulatory care. METHOD: Randomly selected male veterans visiting the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Sepulveda, California, were surveyed in 1992, early in the implementation of the program, and in 1993, after the program had been fully implemented. Two surveys were used: one before the veterans saw their primary care providers (practice-based survey) and the other immediately after patient visits (visit-based survey). Survey-participant data were then linked to computerized utilization and mortality data. Survey topics were mapped to the medical center's strategic plan and goals for ambulatory care, and focused on patients' reports about the care they had received in terms of continuity, access, preventive care, and other aspects of the biopsychosocial model of care. Administrative computer data were then used to evaluate effects on medical center workload. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, chi-square, and logistic regression. RESULTS: For practice-based comparisons, complete data were available for 1,262 veterans in 1992 and 1,373 in 1993. For visit-based comparisons, complete data were available for 1,407 veterans in 1992 and 643 in 1993. Results included statistically significant improvements in continuity of care and detection of depression as well as increased rates of preventive care counseling (smoking and exercise). The proportion of veterans reporting being seen by physicians increased, as did the proportion of patients seen for check-ups rather than for acute problems. Fewer patients were seen in subspecialty clinics than in general medicine clinics. Patient satisfaction increased, hospitalizations decreased, and death rates decreased. Alcohol counseling and access to care for acute symptoms declined. Workload shifted from subspecialists to generalists and from inpatient care to outpatient care. CONCLUSION: The institutional reorganization toward primary and ambulatory care succeeded in substantially improving the quality of ambulatory care, reflecting improvements in the system of care and of health care provider training in ambulatory care.

Ambulatory Care↗

Evaluation of the VA's Pilot Program in Institutional Reorganization Toward Primary and Ambulatory Care: Part II, A study of organizational stresses and dynamics.

BACKGROUND: Many academically affiliated hospitals are moving from an inpatient, subspecialty orientation in their patient care and educational programs toward a greater emphasis on ambulatory and primary care. Few studies have focused on the organizational, staffing, and management issues involved in implementing these changes. METHOD: The authors carried out a qualitative evaluation of the process of change in an academic Department of Veterans Affairs hospital during implementation of a major ambulatory primary care program. They interviewed four top managers individually and 59 top and middle managers, house officers, and patients in focus groups in the spring of 1992, nine months after implementation of the key components of the program. Four raters independently evaluated written transcripts of focus-group sessions and identified themes. RESULTS: The main problems identified were difficulty with administrative integration between inpatient and outpatient services; need for training, retraining, and orientation; tensions due to changes in roles and organizational culture; and inefficiency due to the need for frequent negotiations in daily work life. These four problems reflected tensions associated with new demands imposed by matrix management, changing job descriptions, policies and procedures, and changing patterns of communication and record keeping. CONCLUSION: During the process of implementation of a primary care focus throughout a medical center, extra demands upon staff are inevitable and should be anticipated and planned for. Twelve key factors for successful organizational change are discussed.

Administrative Personnel↗